Optimising safe margins in shoulder surgeries: a cadaveric study on brachial plexus nerves with anthropometric and movement correlation.

PURPOSE: Shoulder surgeries, vital for diverse pathologies, pose a risk of iatrogenic nerve damage. Existing literature lacks diverse bone landmark-specific nerve position data. The purpose of this study is to address this gap by investigating such relationships. METHOD: This cadaveric study examines axillary, radial and suprascapular nerves' relation with acromion, coracoid and greater tuberosity of the humerus (GT). It also correlates this data with humeral lengths and explores nerve dynamics in relation to arm positions. RESULTS: The mean distance from the axillary nerve to (i) GT was 4.38 cm (range 3.32-5.44, SD 0.53), (ii) acromion was 6.42 cm (range 5.03-7.8, SD 0.694) and (iii) coracoid process was 4.3 cm (range 2.76-5.84, SD 0.769). Abduction brought the nerve closer by 0.36 cm, 0.35 cm and 0.53 cm, respectively. The mean distance from radial nerve to (i) GT was 5.46 cm (range 3.78-7.14, SD 0.839), (ii) acromion was 7.82 cm (range 5.4-10.24, SD 1.21) and (iii) tip of the coracoid process was 6.09 cm (range 4.07-8.11 cm, SD 1.01). The mean distance from the suprascapular nerve to the acromion was 4.2 cm (range 3.1-5.4, SD 0.575). The mean humeral length was noted to be 27.83 cm (range 25.3-30.7, SD 1.13). There was no significant correlation between these distances and humeral lengths. CONCLUSION: It is essential to exercise caution to avoid axillary nerve damage during the abduction manoeuvre, as its distance from the greater tuberosity and tip of the coracoid process has shown a significant reduction. The safe margins, in relation to the length of the humerus and consequently the patient's stature, exhibit no significant variation. In situations where the greater tuberosity (GT) and the border of the acromion are inaccessible due to reasons such as trauma, the tip of the coracoid process can serve as a dependable bone landmark for establishing a secure surgical margin.

[Rare Compression Syndrome of the Median Nerve due to a Supracondylar Humeral Process and a Ligament of Struthers]. / Seltenes Kompressionssyndrom des N. medianus durch den Processus supracondylaris und das Struthers-Ligament.

INTRODUCTION: A supracondylar process is a bony spur on the distal anteromedial surface of the humerus, and it is considered an anatomical variant with a prevalence of 0.4-2.7% according to anatomical studies. In almost all cases, it is associated with a fibrous, sometimes ossified ligament, which extends from the supracondylar process to the medial epicondyle. This ligament is known in the literature as the ligament of Struthers, named after the Scottish anatomist who first described it in detail in 1854. In rare cases, the supracondylar process can be a clinically relevant finding as a cause of nerve compression syndrome. The median and ulnar nerve can be trapped by the ring-shaped structure formed by the ligament of Struthers and the supracondylar process. CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old patient with symptoms of a cubital tunnel syndrome and additional ipsilateral sensory deficits in his thumb was referred to our clinic. Electroneurography showed no signs of an additional carpal tunnel syndrome. Preoperative x-ray and CT scans of the upper arm revealed a supracondylar process, which led us to suspect an associated entrapment of the median nerve. An MRI scan of the upper arm showed a ligament of Struthers and signs of a related median nerve compression as we initially assumed. We performed a surgical decompression of the median nerve in the distal upper arm and of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel. Intraoperatively, there was evidence of compression of the median nerve due to the supracondylar process and the ligament of Struthers. The latter was cleaved and then resected along with the supracondylar process. Three months after surgery, the patient had no motor or sensory deficits. SUMMARY: The ring-shaped structure formed by the supracondylar process and ligament of Struthers represents a rare cause of compression syndrome of the median and ulnar nerve. Its incidence remains unknown so far. This anatomical variant should be considered a differential diagnosis in case of possibly related nerve entrapment symptoms after ruling out other, more frequent nerve compression causes. Moreover, the supracondylar process should be completely resected including the periosteum during surgery to minimise the risk of recurrence.

Is the radial groove a myth? Is the radial nerve in direct contact with the posterior humerus?

BACKGROUND: The radial groove is known as a sulcus on the posterior humerus and protects the radial nerve from adjacent muscle and soft tissue. In the literature, there exists heterogeneity regarding the presence of an actual radial groove and the radial nerve's interaction with the periosteum of the humerus. This study aimed to determine if there is a real radial groove, "sulcus," and define the relationship between the radial nerve and the periosteum of the posterior humerus. METHODS: Eighteen fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were dissected using a posterior triceps splitting approach. The radial nerve's interaction with the periosteum of the humerus was determined. The presence of a visible and palpable radial groove was also examined. RESULTS: In 56% of specimens, the radial nerve was directly seated over the periosteum of the posterior humerus (direct contact between the nerve and bone). In comparison, 44% of specimens had a layer of the medial head of the triceps brachii muscle fibers interposition between the nerve and bone. 89% of specimens had no visible or palpable radial groove. In 11% of specimens, there was mild palpable depression. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the radial groove may not exist and is probably not a true anatomical structure. In addition, the nerve is in direct contact with the posterior periosteum of the humerus in most specimens. These anatomic relationships and findings add to the anatomical understanding of the radial nerve, which helps during operative approaches and fixation of the humerus.

A comprehensive review of the "supracondylar process" with translation of Adachi.

The supracondylar process is a nonpathological projection from the distal humerus that in some patients, can result in compression of regional neurovascular structures, for example, median nerve. Since the first description of the supracondylar process in 1818, it has also been a focus of anthropological study because of its possible relevance to human origins and relationships to other species. Although its overall incidence is low, it is more common in races of European descent. It is particularly interesting for anatomists and anthropologists, but knowledge of its anatomical relationships and effect on pathological processes helps in the diagnosis and treatment of supracondylar process syndrome. One of the most detailed descriptions of this variant process stems from the work of Buntaro Adachi. Herein, a translation of his findings is provided and a review of the supracondylar process and its potential pathological presentations presented.

Location of the radial nerve along the humeral shaft between the prone and lateral decubitus positions at different elbow positions.

Identification of the radial nerve is important during the posterior approach to a humerus fracture. During this procedure, the patient can be placed in the prone or lateral decubitus position depending on the surgeon's preference. The distance from the radial nerve to the osseous structures will be different in each position. The purpose of this study was to identify the safety zones in various patient and elbow flexion positions. The distances from the olecranon to the center of the radial groove and intermuscular septum and lateral epicondyle to the lateral intermuscular septum were measured using a digital Vernier caliper. The measurements were performed with cadavers in the lateral decubitus and prone positions at different elbow flexion angles. The distance from where the radial nerve crossed the posterior aspect of the humerus measured from the upper part of the olecranon to the center of the radial nerve in both positions at different elbow flexion angles varied from a mean maximum distance of 130.00 mm with the elbow in full extension in the prone position to a minimum distance of 121.01 mm with the elbow in flexion at 120° in the lateral decubitus position. The mean distance of the radial nerve from the upper olecranon to the lateral intermuscular septum varied from 107.13 to 102.22 mm. The distance from the lateral epicondyle to the lateral edge of the radial nerve varied from 119.92 to 125.38 mm. There was not significant contrast in the position of the radial nerve with osseous landmarks concerning different degrees of flexion, except for 120°, which is not significant, as this flexion angle is rarely used.

Osseous morphology of the medial epicondyle: an anatomoradiological study with potential clinical implications.

PURPOSE: The cubital tunnel is limited anteriorly by the medial epicondyle (ME), laterally by the medial collateral ligament, and superiorly by Osborne's fascia and the cubital tunnel retinaculum. Previous studies were mostly dedicated to the roof of the cubital tunnel, in the way that the study of the groove for ulnar nerve and ME anatomy is relatively scarce in the literature. We sought to describe the radiological anatomy of the groove for ulnar nerve and ME in healthy volunteers with multiplanar computed tomography (CT). METHODS: We analyzed 3D CT images of 30 healthy volunteers (mean age 39 years, range 18-66 years). Nine variables were measured from the right elbow, including sizes, areas and angles in two different planes (coronal and axial). RESULTS: Mean ME width and length were 17.3 ± 3.5 mm and 31.7 ± 4.5 mm, respectively. According to categorical correlation studies, ME width (X) was deemed the most representative morphological characteristic because of the positive correlation to five other different anatomical measurements. A three-tiered anatomical classification was proposed based on data distribution. CONCLUSION: Large individual variation is found in the shape of ME, both in coronal and axial planes. The knowledge of individual osseous morphology is of great value potentially contributing to the surgical decision-making in patients affected by cubital tunnel syndrome.

Surgical anatomy of the radial nerve in the anterior compartment of the arm: relationship with the triceps aponeurosis.

PURPOSE: Injury to the radial nerve is not an uncommon phenomenon in fracture displacement of distal humerus and its operative management as the nerve is immobile and superficial at its point of entry into the anterior compartment and in close proximity to humerus. Such injuries can be reduced by defining a 'safe area' for the radial nerve in relation to the triceps aponeurosis in the distal humerus. METHODS: Radial nerve was dissected in 40 arms and distance of the nerve from triceps aponeurosis was measured at five sites; first one at the level of proximal or medial apex of aponeurosis, followed by four sites along its lateral border. These distances were analyzed to identify its location and to define a 'safe area' in relation to the triceps aponeurosis in the distal humerus. RESULTS: In majority of cases (67.50%), the point of entry of radial nerve into anterior compartment was at the level of proximal or medial apex at a mean distance of 2.11 ± 0.31 cm. The mean distance of radial nerve from the lateral border of triceps aponeurosis was 1.98 ± 0.60 cm with a range of 1.00-2.50 cm. The closest distance between the nerve and the aponeurosis was found to be 1.00 cm at the level of distal or lateral apex. CONCLUSION: The relationship between radial nerve and triceps aponeurosis is constant and easily reproducible. It is suggested that the rectangular zone immediately adjoining the lateral border of aponeurosis (< 1.00 cm) can be considered "safe" for soft tissue dissection while surgically approaching distal humeral fractures.

Safe zone for lateral pin placement for external fixation of the distal humerus.

External fixation is a common, efficient technique used for humeral shaft stabilization and elbow fractures. There are reports of radial nerve injuries associated with this procedure. In this study, we investigated the course and variability of the radial nerve along the lateral humerus in relation to the elbow joint to determine a relatively safe zone for lateral pin placement in external fixation. Twenty upper extremities from 10 cadavers were studied. The nerve branches and course of the radial nerve along the lateral humerus were carefully dissected. Straight lines (a, b, and c) were made connecting three landmarks (the acromion, coracoid process, and anterior wall of the axilla) in the proximal upper extremity to the lateral condyle (LC) of the humerus; their intersections with the radial nerve (A, B, and C) were marked. We analyzed whether the intersection positions were correlated with the connecting line lengths. The mean lengths of the connecting lines were (a) 27.24 ± 2.57, (b) 26.18 ± 2.79, and (c) 20.95 ± 1.44 cm; the distance between the intersection points and the LC of the humerus were (Aa) 7.56 ± 1.31, (Bb) 6.90 ± 2.27, and (Cc) 5.01 ± 0.83 cm; and the measured intersection points of the radial nerve in the lateral aspect of the humerus were (A) 18.48%-34.82%, (B) 13.48%-40.00%, and (C) 19.27%-28.05% of the lengths of lines a, b, and c, respectively. Our data provide a more reliable reference to predict the course of the radial nerve on the lateral humerus and define a safe zone for pin placement. Clin. Anat., 33:637-642, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Establishing Safe Zones to Avoid Nerve Injury in the Approach to the Humerus in Pediatric Patients: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

BACKGROUND: The surgical anatomy of upper-extremity peripheral nerves in adults has been well described as "safe zones" or specific distances from osseous landmarks. In pediatrics, relationships between nerves and osseous landmarks remain ambiguous. The goal of our study was to develop a model to accurately predict the location of the radial and axillary nerves in children to avoid iatrogenic injury when approaching the humerus in this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 116 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of entire humeri of skeletally immature patients; 53 of these studies met our inclusion criteria. Two independent observers reviewed all scans. Arm length was measured as the distance between the lateral aspect of the acromion and the lateral epicondyle. We then calculated the distances (defined as the percentage of arm length) between the radial nerve and distal osseous landmarks (the medial epicondyle, transepicondylar line, and lateral epicondyle) as well between the axillary nerve and the most lateral aspect of the acromion. RESULTS: The axillary nerve was identified at a distance equaling 18.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], ±0.62%) of arm length inferior to the lateral edge of the acromion. The radial nerve crossed (1) the medial cortex of the posterior part of the humerus at a distance equaling 63.19% (95% CI: ±0.942%) of arm length proximal to the medial epicondyle, (2) the middle of the posterior part of the humerus at a distance equaling 53.9% (95% CI: ±1.08%) of arm length proximal to the transepicondylar line, (3) the lateral cortex of the posterior part of the humerus at a distance equaling 45% (95% CI: ±0.99%) of arm length proximal to the lateral epicondyle, and (4) from the posterior to the anterior compartment at a distance equaling 35.3% (95% CI: ±0.92%) of arm length proximal to the lateral epicondyle. A strong linear relationship between these distances and arm length was observed, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of >0.9 across all measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The positions of the radial and axillary nerves maintain linear relationships with arm lengths in growing children. The locations of these nerves in relation to palpable osseous landmarks are predictable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowing the locations of upper-extremity peripheral nerves as a proportion of arm length in skeletally immature patients may help to avoid iatrogenic injuries during surgical approaches to the humerus.

The safety and feasibility of minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the posterior aspect of the humerus: A cadaveric study.

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of applying MIPO of the humerus via the posterior approach and to observe the tension of the radial nerve in different elbow positions. Two separate incisions were made on the posterior aspect of the humerus in ten fresh cadavers (20 humeri). The radial nerve was identified at the proximal incision and the distances through which the nerve could be elevated from the bone with the elbow in flexion and extension were measured. A 10-hole extra-articular distal humeral locking compression plate was inserted and fixed through the submuscular tunnel. The tunnel was then explored to identify any entrapment of the radial nerve and to observe the anatomical relationship of the radial nerve to the plate and bone. There was no entrapment of the radial nerve or its branches. The distances through which the radial nerve could be elevated were greater with the elbow in extension than in flexion (P < 0.01). The radial nerve crossed the medial and lateral borders of the posterior surface of the humerus at 80.1-132 mm (average 104.7 mm) and 116.6-175.5 mm (average 142.7 mm) of its total length, respectively. The axillary nerve was located at 38.7-61.7 mm (average 47.9 mm) of total humeral length. MIPO of the humerus using the posterior approach is an alternative option for treating distal humeral shaft fracture. The risk of radial nerve injury can be minimized by careful dissection in the proximal incision. Clin. Anat. 32:176-182, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Connections between radial and ulnar nerve at high humeral level in cadavers: incidence, topography, and literature review.

PURPOSE: Although communications between branches and cords of the brachial plexus have been extensively published, there is a scarcity of reports concerning radial and ulnar nerve (RN-UN) communication in the arm. The current study aims to demonstrate the incidence, topography, and length of communicating branches between RN and UN. Any additional coexisted variations were also recorded. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-six upper limbs collected from one hundred and thirty-three (81 males and 52 females) Greek cadavers were dissected. RESULTS: Three out of one hundred and thirty-three cadavers, accounting for an incidence of up to 2.3%, were found to have an atypical communicating branch originating at a high humeral level from RN towards UN. In two cadavers, communicating branches were detected on the left side and in one cadaver bilaterally. CONCLUSIONS: The study of atypical communications between RN and UN attracts great attention for its clinical importance, mainly in cases of peripheral neuropathies with diagnostic dilemma or upper limb nerve injury producing an otherwise unexpected symptomatology due to the aberrant nerve supply. Familiarity with these variations is crucial in avoiding misdiagnosis and preserving valuable communicating branches, thus achieving an uneventful outcome in cases of upper limb nerve injury repair.

Radial nerve palsy in humeral shaft fractures with internal fixation: analysis of management and outcome.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of radial nerve injury after humeral shaft fractures is on average 11.8% (Shao et al., J Bone Jt Surg Br 87(12):1647-1652, 2005) representing the most common peripheral nerve injury associated with long bone fractures (Korompilias et al., Injury, 2013). The purpose of this study was to analyze our current policy and long-term outcome, regarding surgically treated humeral shaft fractures in combination with radial nerve palsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with surgically treated humeral shaft fractures from 01/01/2003 to 28/02/2013. The analysis included fracture type, soft tissue injury regarding closed and open fractures, type of fixation, management, and outcome of radial nerve palsy. RESULTS: A total of 151 humeral shaft fractures were fixed in our hospital. In 20 (13%) cases, primary radial palsy was observed. Primary nerve exploration was performed in nine cases. Out of the 13 patients with follow-up, 10 showed a complete, 2 a partial, and 1 a minimal nerve recovery. Two of them underwent a revision procedure. Secondary radial nerve palsy occurred in 9 (6%) patients postoperatively. In five patients, the radial nerve was not exposed during the initial surgery and, therefore, underwent revision with nerve exploration. In all 5, a potential cause for the palsy was found and corrected as far as possible with full recovery in 3 and minimal recovery in one patient. In four patients with exposure of the nerve during the initial surgery, no revision was performed. All of these 4 showed a full recovery. CONCLUSION: Our study showed an overall rate of 19% radial nerve palsy in surgically treated humeral shaft fractures. Most of the primary palsies (13%) recovered spontaneously, and therefore, nerve exploration was only exceptionally needed. The incidence of secondary palsy after surgery (6%) was high and mainly seen after plate fixation. In these cases, we recommend early nerve exploration, to detect and treat potential curable neural lesions.

The course of the radial nerve in the distal humerus: A novel, anatomy based, radiographic assessment.

METHODS AND FINDINGS: Measurements were done on both arms of ten specially embalmed specimens. Arms were dissected and radiopaque wires attached to the radial nerve in the distal part of the upper arm. Digital radiographs were obtained to determine the course of the radial nerve in the distal 20 cm of the humerus in relation to bony landmarks; medial epicondyle and capitellum-trochlea projection (CCT). Analysis was done with ImageJ and Microsoft Excel software. We also compared humeral nail specifications from different companies with the course of the radial nerve to predict possible radial nerve damage. RESULTS: The distance from the medial epicondyle to point where the radial nerve bends from posterior to lateral was 142 mm on AP radiographs and 152 mm measured on the lateral radiographs. The average distance from the medial epicondyle to point where the radial nerve bends from lateral to anterior on AP radiographs was 66 mm. On the lateral radiographs where the nerve moves away from the anterior cortex 83 mm to the center of capitellum and trochlea (CCT). The distance from the bifurcation of the radial nerve into the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) and superficial radial nerve was 21 mm on AP radiographs and 42 mm on the lateral radiographs (CCT). CONCLUSIONS: The course of the radial nerve in the distal part of the upper arm has great variety. Lateral fixation is relatively safe in a zone between the center of capitellum-trochlea and 48 mm proximal to this point. The danger zone in lateral fixation is in-between 48-122 mm proximal from CCT. In anteroposterior direction; distal fixation is dangerous between 21-101 mm measured from the medial epicondyle. The more distal, the more medial the nerve courses making it more valuable to iatrogenic damage. The IMN we compared with our data all show potential risk in case of (blind) distal locking, especially from lateral to medial direction.

Radial nerve location at the posterior aspect of the humerus: an anatomic study of 100 specimens.

PURPOSE: Radial neuropathy represents a devastating complication in a posterior approach to the distal humerus. This study aimed to propose "safe zones" regarding the radial nerve (RN) location at the posterior aspect of the humerus to minimize the risk of iatrogenic injury. METHODS: In 100 embalmed specimens, the distances of the proximal edge of the olecranon fossa (OF) to the radial nerve at the medial edge (R1), at the center (R2) and at the lateral edge (R3) of the posterior aspect of humeral shaft were measured. Humeral length (HL) and transcondylar width (TW) were evaluated and correlated to R1, R2 and R3. RESULTS: R1 was 15.0 (±2.1; 10.6-19.5) cm, R2 averaged 12.7 (±1.6; 8.9-15.7) cm, R3 was 10.6 (±1.3; 7.6-13.7) cm. HL was 30.8 (±1.9) cm. TW averaged 6.3 (±0.6) cm. TW and HL correlate with R1, R2, R3 (r = 0.451-0.565 [95% CI 0.279-0.685]). The mean ratio was 2.3 (±0.18) for HL/R1, 2.6 (±0.23) for HL/R2 and 3.1 (±0.31) for HL/R3. The ratio averaged 2.2 (±0.20) for R1/TW, 1.9 (±0.18) for R2/TW and 1.6 (±0.15) for R3/TW. CONCLUSIONS: We present the OF as an osseous landmark to reduce the risk of iatrogenic radial neuropathy. HL and TW can be reliably used to estimate the RN location. The consistent "safe zones" of the RN in relation to the OF are 10.5 cm at the medial edge, 9 cm at the center and 7.5 cm at the lateral edge of the posterior aspect of the humeral shaft.

[Medial transposition of the radial nerve in steel plate internal fixation of lower segment fracture of humerus].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the method of medial transposition of the radial nerve in plate fixation of lower segment fracture of humerus. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2013,31 patients with medial transposition of the radial nerve in plate fixation of lower segment fracture of humerus, including 18 males and 13 females ranging in age from 26 to 58 years old with a mean of 37 years old. The time between injury and operation was 1 to 8 days with an average of 4.5 days. According to AO classification, 7 fractures were type A1, 3 fractures were type A2, 6 fractures were type A3, 2 fractures were type B1, 4 fractures were type B2, 2 fractures were type B3, 4 fractures were type C, 3 fractures were type C2. No patients had any signs of radial nerve injury. The results were evaluated with DASH (disability of arm-shoulder-hand) Questionnaire by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) which 0 indicated normal upper extremity function, and 1 to 100 indicated varying degrees of damage to the function of the upper extremties. RESULTS: There was no neurologic complication or postoperative wound infection in this series. The followed-up period ranged form 8 to 15 months (means 11 months) postoperatively. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with DASH Questionnaire, the score before operation was 76.2±11.8, the final follow-up score was 8.2±7.4, the final follow-up score was significant higher than before operation (P<0.01). The function of the upper extremities recovered satisfactorily. CONSLUSION: The method of medial transposition of the radial nerve in plate fixation of lower segment fracture of humerus can avoid iatrogenic radial nerve injury effectively.

[THERAPEUTIC APPROACH TO HUMERAL BONE FRACTURES COMPLICATED BY PERIPHERAL NERVE TRAUMA].

On the basis of treatment results of 28 patients, the authors suggested that the clinical method of diagnostics allowed performance of topical diagnostics of injury using bedside test. It would help to choose a therapeutic approach in each clinical case.

[METHOD OF OSTEOSYNTHESIS OF SUPRACONDULAR FRACTURES OF THE HUMERUS].

A treatment of fractures of distal metadiaphysis of the humeral bone remains an actual problem of modern traumatology at present time. This is associated with immediate proximity of the radial nerve and risk of iatrogenic injury in external fixation, presence of short distal fragment, comminuted nature of fracture, complexity of treatment method selection, need of extensible approach. Biomechanical features of different fixators were analyzed in consideration of presence of short distal fragment, traumatic of. external fixation and risk of iatrogenic injury of the nerve. The authors suggested the method of osteosynthesis of the humerus by using blocking osteosynthesis with preliminary extension of intra-medullary canal of distal fragment for obtaining stable osteosynthesis (priority No 2014105323 from 14.02.2014). The proposed method allowed avoiding the iatrogenic neuropathy of the radial nerve, providing the stability of fixation higher, than in case of external fixation. It excludes the need of external immobilization and combines the period of bony union with the period of rehabilitation and socially integrates the patient in minimal terms.

[Destruction of the Humeral Head in Sensory Deficit due to the Spinal Hemorhagia. Case Report]. / Destrukce hlavice humeru pri senzitivním deficitu po mísní hemoragii - kazuistika.

Degenerative changes of the shoulder are a common complication in patients after spinal cord injury. The main cause is chronic overload to the shoulder joint due to manual wheelchair propulsion and transfers. Reduced shoulder function has a significant impact on all aspects of daily life. Shoulder arthroplasty in this group of patients is a challenging procedure because of the unique demand on the shoulder. This report presents the case of a wheelchair user who additionally experienced a complete loss of sensation around her shoulder. As a result of a repetitive strain during transfers from the wheelchair to the ground, the humeral head was destroyed.

Supracondylar process syndrome: case report and literature review.

The supracondylar process is a congenital bone projection on the distal anteromedial humerus often associated with a ligament of Struthers, a fibrous connection between the process and medial epicondyle. It is largely asymptomatic and only on rare occasions presents with neurovascular compression resulting in a supracondylar process syndrome. This case report describes a 28-year-old woman with supracondylar process syndrome, and our management. The topic is further explored with a literature review of 43 reported cases. Analysis of the case reports indicates that isolated median nerve injuries are the most common. Other presentations such as fractures, vascular compromise, and ulnar nerve involvement are less frequent.