RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Delayed bleeding (DB) is the most common major complication of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Two randomized clinical trials recently demonstrated that clip closure after EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) reduces the risk of DB. We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of this prophylactic measure. METHODS: EMRs of LNCPCPs were consecutively registered in the ongoing prospective multicenter database of the Spanish EMR Group from May 2013 until July 2017. Patients were classified according to the Spanish Endoscopy Society EMR group (GSEED-RE2) DB risk score. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed for both Spanish and US economic contexts. The average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) thresholds were set at 54,000 or $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year, respectively. RESULTS: We registered 2,263 EMRs in 2,130 patients. Applying their respective DB relative risk reductions after clip closure (51% and 59%), the DB rate decreased from 4.5% to 2.2% in the total cohort and from 13.7% to 5.7% in the high risk of the DB GSEED-RE2 subgroup. The ICERs for the universal clipping strategy in Spain and the United States, 469,706 and $1,258,641, respectively, were not cost effective. By contrast, selective clipping in the high-risk of DB GSEED-RE2 subgroup was cost saving, with a negative ICER of -2,194 in the Spanish context and cost effective with an ICER of $87,796 in the United States. DISCUSSION: Clip closure after EMR of large colorectal lesions is cost effective in patients with a high risk of bleeding. The GSEED-RE2 DB risk score may be a useful tool to identify that high-risk population.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/métodos , Pólipos/cirugía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/economía , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colonoscopía/economía , Colonoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pólipos/patología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/terapia , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , España , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient blood management (PBM) interventions aim to improve clinical outcomes by reducing bleeding and transfusion. We assessed whether existing evidence supports the routine use of combinations of these interventions during and after major surgery. METHODS: Five systematic reviews and a National Institute of Health and Care Excellence health economic review of trials of common PBM interventions enrolling participants of any age undergoing surgery were updated. The last search was on June 1, 2019. Studies in trauma, burns, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, gynaecology, dentistry, or critical care were excluded. The co-primary outcomes were: risk of receiving red cell transfusion and 30-day or hospital all-cause mortality. Treatment effects were estimated using random-effects models and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity assessments used I2. Network meta-analyses used a frequentist approach. The protocol was registered prospectively (PROSPERO CRD42018085730). RESULTS: Searches identified 393 eligible randomised controlled trials enrolling 54 917 participants. PBM interventions resulted in a reduction in exposure to red cell transfusion (RR=0.60; 95% CI 0.57, 0.63; I2=77%), but had no statistically significant treatment effect on 30-day or hospital mortality (RR=0.93; 95% CI 0.81, 1.07; I2=0%). Treatment effects were consistent across multiple secondary outcomes, sub-groups and sensitivity analyses that considered clinical setting, type of intervention, and trial quality. Network meta-analysis did not demonstrate additive benefits from the use of multiple interventions. No trial demonstrated that PBM was cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: In randomised trials, PBM interventions do not have important clinical benefits beyond reducing bleeding and transfusion in people undergoing major surgery.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Transfusión Sanguínea/economía , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos OperativosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hemostatic agents are routinely used in vascular surgery to complement proper suture techniques and decrease the risk of perioperative bleeding. A relative lack of comparative research studies have left surgeons with the option of choosing hemostatic agents based on their personal experience. The present review has highlighted the efficacy and safety of hemostatic agents and categorized them according to their primary mechanism of action and cost. METHODS: A systematic search strategy encompassing hemostatic agent products was deployed in the PubMed database. Single-center and multicenter, randomized, controlled trials with >10 patients were included in the present study. RESULTS: We reviewed 12 studies on the efficacy and safety of hemostatic agents compared with manual compression or other hemostatic agents. Using the time to hemostasis as the primary end point, all studies had found hemostatic agents to be significantly more efficient than manual compression. Likewise, adhesives (high pressure sealants) and dual agents (containing biologically active and absorbable components) were found to be more efficient, but costlier, than agents with either biologically active or absorbable components only. Agents with porcine or bovine constituents were found to trigger anaphylactic reactions in rare cases. Additionally, the absence of fibrin stabilizing factor XIII in a brand of fibrin sealant was speculated to reduce the affinity of the fibrin sealant for the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft. The cost of agents varied greatly depending on their active ingredient. CONCLUSIONS: Hemostatic agents appear to be highly effective at decreasing the risk of bleeding during surgical procedures. Although some hemostatic agents were demonstrated to achieve hemostasis faster than others, most are able to control bleeding within <10 minutes. Based on the limited data, the least expensive agents might suffice for limited suture lines used in routine procedures.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Técnicas de Sutura , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Técnicas Hemostáticas/efectos adversos , Técnicas Hemostáticas/economía , Hemostáticos/efectos adversos , Hemostáticos/economía , Humanos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/economíaRESUMEN
Background: Prolonged hospitalization after tonsillectomy up to three nights was implemented to decrease mortality due to post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage.Aims: To assess if extension of postoperative inpatient observation time from one to three nights results in potential benefits following tonsillectomy.Subjects and methods: Patients who stayed only one night post-tonsillectomy between 1994 and 2006 (Group A) were compared to 1570 patients who stayed three nights postoperatively between 2008 and 2016 (Group B). Complication rate and expense of hospitalization were compared.Results: Published data show that 114 (1.78%) out of 6400 patients in group A had post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage. In this patient group 75.4% (n = 86) of all bleedings occurred after discharge from hospital. However, in group B post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage occurred in 70 (4.5%) and of those only 0.38% (n = 6) developed bleeding episodes on the second or third postoperative day (POD). As observed in group A, the majority of hemorrhage (n = 57; 81.4%) was observed after discharge. Cost analysis reveals a difference of approximately 6 million for all 32 ENT departments per year in Austria.Conclusions and significance: Extending postoperative hospitalization from one to three nights reveals no benefit after tonsillectomy. Comparison reveals substantial increase of costs for an extended 3 nights inpatient stay.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/cirugía , Tonsilectomía/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Austria , Niño , Preescolar , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Absceso Peritonsilar/cirugía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/cirugía , Tonsilitis/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery results in complications for some patients that lead to a longer hospital stay and higher costs. This study identified the presurgery characteristics of patients that were associated with the cost of their hospital stay and estimated how much of that cost could be attributed to a bleeding event, defined as requiring 3 units or more of packed red blood cells or returning to the operating room for bleeding. We also identified the presurgery characteristics that were associated with the bleeding event. METHODS: This prospective cohort of patients (n = 1459) underwent cardiac surgery at 3 tertiary referral hospitals in Australia during 2014 and 2015. Clinical data included the variables held by the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons registry. Cost data were collected as part of a state-level hospital data collection. RESULTS: Many of the baseline patient characteristics were associated with the total cost of cardiac surgery. After adjusting for these characteristics, the cost of cardiac surgery was 1.76 (confidence interval, 1.64-1.90) times higher for patients who had a bleeding event (P < .001), thus resulting in a median increase in costs (in Australian dollars) of $33,338 (confidence interval, $21,943-$38,415). Several baseline characteristics were strongly associated with a bleeding event. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of a bleeding event on the cost of cardiac surgery is substantial. This study identified a set of risk factors for bleeding that could be used to identify patients for discussion at the heart team level, where measures to minimize the risk of transfusion may be initiated.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/cirugía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Anciano , Australia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/terapiaAsunto(s)
Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Profilácticos/economía , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Ahorro de Costo , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/economía , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Profilácticos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Profilácticos/métodos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There is little data on the cost of treating brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The goal of this study then is to identify cost determinants in multimodal management of brain AVMs. METHODS: One hundred forty patients with brain AVMs prospectively enrolled in the UCSF brain AVM registry and treated between 2012 and 2015 were included in the study. Patient and AVM characteristics, treatment type, and length of stay and radiographic evidence of obliteration were collected from the registry. We then calculated the cost of all inpatient and outpatient encounters, interventions, and imaging attributable to the AVM. We used generalized linear models to test whether there was an association between patient and AVM characteristics, treatment type, and cost and length of stay. We tested whether the proportion of patients with radiographic evidence of obliteration differed between treatment modalities using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The overall median cost of treatment and interquartile range was $77,865 (49,566-107,448). Surgery with preoperative embolization was the costliest treatment at $91,948 (79,914-140,600), while radiosurgery was the least at $20,917 (13,915-35,583). In multi-predictor analyses, hemorrhage, Spetzler-Martin grade, and treatment type were significant predictors of cost. Patients who had surgery had significantly higher rates of obliteration compared with radiosurgery patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hemorrhage, AVM grade, and treatment modality are significant cost determinants in AVM management. Surgery with preoperative embolization was the costliest treatment and radiosurgery the least; however, surgical cases had significantly higher rates of obliteration.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/cirugía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Radiocirugia/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/economía , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiocirugia/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Background Bleeding is a common, morbid, and costly complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. While bleeding avoidance strategies ( BAS ) are effective, they are used paradoxically less in patients at high risk of bleeding. Whether a patient-centered approach to specifically increase the risk-concordant use of BAS and, thus, reverse the risk-treatment paradox is associated with reduced bleeding and costs is unknown. Methods and Results We implemented an intervention to reverse the bleeding risk-treatment paradox at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, and examined: (1) the temporal trends in BAS use and (2) the association of risk-concordant BAS use with bleeding and hospital costs of percutaneous coronary intervention. Among 3519 percutaneous coronary interventions, there was a significantly increasing trend ( P=0.002) in risk-concordant use of BAS . The bleeding incidence was 2% in the risk-concordant group versus 9% in the risk-discordant group (absolute risk difference, 7%; number needed to treat, 14). Risk-concordant BAS use was associated with a 67% (95% confidence interval, 52-78%; P<0.001) reduction in the risk of bleeding and a $4738 (95% confidence interval, 3353-6122; P<0.001) reduction in per-patient percutaneous coronary intervention hospitalization costs (21.6% cost-savings). Conclusions In this study, patient-centered care directly aimed to make treatment-related decisions based on predicted risk of bleeding, led to more risk-concordant use of BAS and reversal of the risk-treatment paradox. This, in turn, was associated with a reduction in bleeding and hospitalization costs. Larger multicentered studies are needed to corroborate these results. As clinical medicine moves toward personalization, both patients and hospitals can benefit from a simple practice change that encourages objectivity and mitigates variability in care.
Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To assess the blood loss and cost-effectiveness of the oral and intravenous (IV) administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) for the treatment of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: From January 2017 to August 2017, 100 patients undergoing primary THA were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. In the oral TXA group (Nâ¯=â¯50), 1â¯g of TXA (2 tablets of 500â¯mg) was given 2â¯h before the incision, and the same dose was repeated 3â¯h and 6â¯h postoperatively. In the IV TXA group (Nâ¯=â¯50), 1â¯g of TXA was administered 10â¯min before the incision, and the same dose was repeated 3â¯h and 6â¯h postoperatively. The total follow-up period was 6â¯months. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in total blood loss (863.3⯱â¯272.5â¯mL and 886.1⯱â¯200.2â¯mL, Pâ¯=â¯0.66), maximum Hb drop (2.9⯱â¯0.6â¯g/dl and 3.1⯱â¯0.8â¯g/dl, Pâ¯=â¯0.17), maximum Hct drop (7.4⯱â¯2.1% and 7.7⯱â¯1.8%, Pâ¯=â¯0.48), transfusion rates (1 and 2, Pâ¯=â¯1.00) and transfusion units (1.5 u and 3 u, Pâ¯=â¯0.56) between the two groups. However, the costs of TXA in the oral group were significantly lower than those in the IV TXA group (¥600 and ¥3150, Pâ¯<â¯0.01). There was no difference in the Hb levels on postoperative days 1 and 3. No significant differences were found for operating time, hospital length of stay, DVT and/or PE, and wound complications in the postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the oral and IV administration of TXA in patients undergoing THA was proved to be an equivalent and effective method in reducing blood loss and transfusion rates. However, oral TXA is more cost-effectiveness than IV TXA, and it may be an alternative to the IV form.
Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Anciano , Antifibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Antifibrinolíticos/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Transfusión Sanguínea/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Ácido Tranexámico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Tranexámico/economía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This observational study was aimed to identify patients who experienced non-deferrable surgery and/or uncontrolled severe bleeding following dabigatran administration and then are potentially eligible to the use of the specific antidote idarucizumab in a real-world setting. METHODS: From the big Italian real-world database ARCO, a cohort of adult patients treated with dabigatran and hospitalized due to diagnoses attributable to urgent interventions and/or major bleeding was selected in 2014. Baseline characteristics and all-cause hospitalizations, specialist/diagnostic outpatient services, and healthcare costs over the 1-year follow-up were described. RESULTS: Out of 16,756,843 Italian citizens, 271,540 (1.9%) were prescribed with oral anticoagulants, and specifically, 17,450 with dabigatran. Patients identified to be hospitalized for non-deferrable surgery (n = 106) and/or uncontrolled severe bleeding (n = 190) following dabigatran use were 289 (1.7%) [mean age (± SD) 79 ± 7, 50% of female sex]. On average, patients stayed in hospital 13.7 and 17.0 days, respectively. The per patient and per year cost to the Italian National Health System was on average 19,708 (specifically 1487 for drugs, of which 311 for dabigatran, 17,353 for all-cause hospitalizations, and 869 for outpatient care), about four times more than the mean healthcare integrated cost of a single patient treated with dabigatran (4775). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of the ARCO database reliably describes the population potentially eligible to the dabigatran reversal agent, idarucizumab. These data may be useful for Healthcare Decision Makers to organize, define, and improve present and future emergency healthcare, mainly as starting point for cost-effectiveness analyses of new reversal agents.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antídotos/uso terapéutico , Antitrombinas/efectos adversos , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Dabigatrán/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Antídotos/economía , Antitrombinas/administración & dosificación , Antitrombinas/economía , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Dabigatrán/administración & dosificación , Dabigatrán/economía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/sangre , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To define the cost of pancreatectomies and to identify factors associated with increased hospital costs after pancreatic resection. METHODS: All patients undergoing pancreatic surgery in our department between January 2008 and December 2014 were included. All complications occurring during hospitalization or in the 90-day period after discharge were documented. The hospital costs were analyzed and predictive factors of increased hospital costs were determined. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty seven patients were identified. Most patients underwent pancreatectomy for malignant tumors (70%). Median hospital costs were 21,392 [15,998-29,667] euros. Age (P=0.011) and preoperative jaundice (P<0.001) were associated with higher hospital costs. Intraoperative surgical time and blood loss were correlated with increased costs (P=0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). Pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with statistically significantly higher costs compared to distal pancreatectomy (21,770 vs. 15,422 euros, P=0.001). Severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade≥3) (P=0.001), septic complications (P=0.002) and hemorrhage (P=0.001) statistically significantly increased costs. In multivariate analysis, septic (P=0.003) and severe complications (P=0.01) were statistically significantly associated with increased hospital costs. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic surgery is associated with high hospital costs, essentially related to postoperative complications.
Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital , Páncreas/cirugía , Pancreatectomía/economía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Ictericia/complicaciones , Ictericia/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/economíaRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to evaluate the financial implications and the impact of pre-existing atrial fibrillation (AF) on in-hospital outcomes in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. We identified patients who underwent TAVI from 2011 to 2014. The primary end point was the effect of pre-existing AF on in-hospital mortality. Secondary end points included periprocedural cardiac complications, stroke, and hemorrhage requiring transfusion. We also assessed length of stay (LOS) and cost of hospitalization. A mixed-effect logistic model was used for clinical end points, and a linear mixed model was used for cost and LOS. In 6,778 patients who underwent TAVI (46.1% women and 81.4 ± 8.5 years old), the incidence of AF was 43.3%. After adjusting for patient- and hospital-level characteristics, pre-existing AF was not found to influence in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 1.36). AF was associated with an increased risk of periprocedural cardiac complications (odds ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.75), longer LOS (p <0.001) and an increased cost of hospitalization (US$51,852 vs US$49,599). In conclusion, pre-existing AF did not impact in-hospital mortality in TAVI patients but was associated with increased cardiac complications, a longer hospital LOS, and a higher cost of hospitalization.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/economía , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Taponamiento Cardíaco/economía , Taponamiento Cardíaco/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/economía , Paro Cardíaco/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/economía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/economía , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Marcapaso Artificial , Derrame Pericárdico/economía , Derrame Pericárdico/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Because of its minimally invasive nature, percutaneous femoral access for endovascular aneurysm repair (pEVAR) is currently undergoing rapid popularization. Compared with surgical cutdown for femoral access (cEVAR), it offers the advantage of faster recovery after surgery as well as a reduction in wound complications. Despite proposed advantages, the method is largely considered uneconomical because of its reliance on costly closure devices. METHODS: There were 50 patients undergoing EVAR who were enrolled in this randomized prospective single-center trial. Each patient randomly received percutaneous access in one groin and surgical access in the other. The primary end points were access duration and cost. Secondary end points were wound complications and the postoperative pain levels. RESULTS: Surgery was performed per protocol in 44 patients. Mean access times for pEVAR and cEVAR were 11.5 ± 3.4 minutes and 24.8 ± 12.1 minutes (P < .001), respectively. Total access costs were 559.65 ± 112.69 for pEVAR and 674.85 ± 289.55 for cEVAR (P = .016). Eight complications in six patients were attributed to cutdown, none to pEVAR (P = .02). The percutaneously accessed groin was significantly less painful at day 1 and day 5 after surgery (P < .001). An intention-to-treat analysis (N = 50 patients) included six cases of pEVAR conversion due to technical failure in three patients (6%) and change of the operative strategy in another three patients (eg, aortouni-iliac stent graft followed by crossover bypass). The intention-to-treat analysis showed shorter mean overall access time for pEVAR (pEVAR, 14.65 ± 10.20 minutes; cEVAR, 25.12 ± 11.77 minutes; P < .001) and no cost difference between the two methods (pEVAR, 651.29 ± 313.49; cEVAR, 625.53 ± 238.29; P = .65). CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm proposed potential benefits attributable to the minimally invasive nature of pEVAR while demonstrating cost-effectiveness despite the additional cost of closure devices. Taking into account pEVAR failures still does not increase pEVAR costs over cEVAR. Further considering reduced postoperative pain and wound complications, the technique deserves consideration in suitable patients.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/economía , Aneurisma/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/economía , Cateterismo Periférico/economía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Costos de Hospital , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Austria , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Hematoma/economía , Hematoma/etiología , Hematoma/terapia , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Dolor Postoperatorio/economía , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/terapia , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Punciones , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Flowable haemostatic agents have been shown to be superior to non-flowable agents in terms of haemostatic control and need for transfusion products in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We investigated the economic impact of the use of a flowable haemostatic agent (Floseal) compared with non-flowable oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC) agent in primary elective cardiac surgery from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: A cost-consequence framework based upon clinical data from a prospective trial and an observational trial and NHS-specific actual reference costs (2016) was developed to compare the economic impact of Floseal with that of ORC. The individual domains of care investigated comprised complications (major and minor) avoided, operating room time savings, surgical revisions for bleeding avoided and transfusions avoided. The cost impact of Floseal versus ORC on ICU days and extended bed days avoided was modelled separately. RESULTS: Compared with ORC, the use of Floseal would be associated with overall net savings to the NHS of £178,283 per 100 cardiac surgery patients who experience intraoperative bleeding requiring haemostatic therapy. Cost savings were apparent in all individual domains of care (complications avoided: £83,536; operating room time saved: £63,969; surgical revisions avoided: £34,038; and blood transfusions avoided: £22,317). Cost savings per 100 patients with Floseal over ORC in terms of ICU days avoided (n = 30) and extended bed days avoided (n = 51.7) were £57,960 and £21,965, respectively. A sensitivity analysis indicated that these findings remained robust when the model parameters representing the clinical benefit of Floseal over ORC were reduced by up to 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher initial acquisition costs, the use of flowable haemostatic agents achieves substantial cost savings over non-flowable agents in cardiac surgery. These cost savings commence during the operating theatre and appear to continue to be realised throughout the postoperative period.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Celulosa Oxidada/farmacología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Esponja de Gelatina Absorbible/farmacología , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/métodos , Hemostáticos/farmacología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Medicina Estatal , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fallopian tubes are commonly removed during laparoscopic and open hysterectomy to prevent ovarian and tubal cancer but are not routinely removed during vaginal hysterectomy because of perceptions of increased morbidity, difficulty, or inadequate surgical training. OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify complications and costs associated with a strategy of planned salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: We created a decision analysis model using TreeAgePro. Effectiveness outcomes included ovarian cancer incidence and mortality as well as major surgical complications. Modeled complications included transfusion, conversion to laparotomy or laparoscopy, abscess/hematoma requiring intervention, ileus, readmission, and reoperation within 30 days. We also modeled subsequent benign adnexal surgery beyond the postoperative window. Those whose procedures were converted from a vaginal route were assumed to undergo bilateral salpingectomy, regardless of treatment group, following American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines. Costs were gathered from published literature and Medicare reimbursement data, with internal cost data from 892 hysterectomies at a single institution used to estimate costs when necessary. Complication rates were determined from published literature and from 13,397 vaginal hysterectomies recorded in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2008 through 2013. RESULTS: Switching from a policy of vaginal hysterectomy alone to a policy of routine planned salpingectomy prevents a diagnosis of ovarian cancer in 1 of every 225 women having surgery and prevents death from ovarian cancer in 1 of every 450 women having surgery. Overall, salpingectomy was a less expensive strategy than not performing salpingectomy ($7350.62 vs $8113.45). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the driving force behind increased costs was the increased risk of subsequent benign adnexal surgery among women retaining their tubes. Planned opportunistic salpingectomy had more major complications than hysterectomy alone (7.95% vs 7.68%). Major complications included transfusion, conversion to laparotomy or laparoscopy, abscess/hematoma requiring intervention, ileus, readmission, and reoperation within 30 days. Therefore, routine salpingectomy results in 0.61 additional complications per case of cancer prevented and 1.21 additional complications per death prevented. A surgeon therefore must withstand an additional â¼3 complications to prevent 5 cancer diagnoses and â¼6 additional complications to prevent 5 cancer deaths. CONCLUSION: Salpingectomy should routinely be performed with vaginal hysterectomy because it was the dominant and therefore cost-effective strategy. Complications are minimally increased, but the trade-off with cancer prevention is highly favorable.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Histerectomía Vaginal/métodos , Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Profilácticos/métodos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Salpingectomía/métodos , Absceso/economía , Absceso/epidemiología , Adulto , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Hematoma/economía , Hematoma/epidemiología , Humanos , Histerectomía Vaginal/economía , Ileus/economía , Ileus/epidemiología , Laparoscopía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Profilácticos/economía , Reoperación/economía , Medición de Riesgo , Salpingectomía/economía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/economía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVES: To determine if the use of cell saver reduces overall blood costs in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies have questioned the clinical value of cell saver during spine procedures. METHODS: ASD patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter surgical database who had complete preoperative and surgical data were identified. Patients were stratified into (1) cell saver available during surgery, but no intraoperative autologous infusion (No Infusion group), or (2) cell saver available and received autologous infusion (Infusion group). RESULTS: There were 427 patients in the Infusion group and 153 in the No infusion group. Patients in both groups had similar demographics. Mean autologous infusion volume was 698 mL. The Infusion group had a higher percentage of EBL relative to the estimated blood volume (42.2%) than the No Infusion group (19.6%, p < .000). Allogeneic transfusion was more common in the Infusion group (255/427, 60%) than the No Infusion group (67/153, 44%, p = .001). The number of allogeneic blood units transfused was also higher in the Infusion group (2.4) than the No Infusion group (1.7, p = .009). Total blood costs ranged from $396 to $2,146 in the No Infusion group and from $1,262 to $5,088 in the Infusion group. If the cost of cell saver blood was transformed into costs of allogeneic blood, total blood costs for the Infusion group would range from $840 to $5,418. Thus, cell saver use yielded a mean cost savings ranging from $330 to $422 (allogeneic blood averted). Linear regression showed that after an EBL of 614 mL, cell saver becomes cost-efficient. CONCLUSION: Compared to transfusing allogeneic blood, cell saver autologous infusion did not reduce the proportion or the volume of allogeneic transfusion for patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity. The use of cell saver becomes cost-efficient above an EBL of 614 mL, producing a cost savings of $330 to $422. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Sangre Autóloga/economía , Transfusión Sanguínea/economía , Anomalías Congénitas/cirugía , Columna Vertebral/anomalías , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión Sanguínea/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recuperación de Sangre Operatoria/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Importance: Bleeding complications after percutaneous transcatheter interventions that used large-bore catheters are frequent and associated with high mortality and morbidity. Objective: To describe the incidence of bleeding complications among patients undergoing contemporary endovascular interventions involving large-bore catheters and its association with in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and health care cost. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study analyzed all 17â¯672 patients from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample database who were recorded as having undergone a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (n = 3223), an endovascular aneurysm repair (n = 12â¯633), or a percutaneous left ventricular assist device implant (n = 1816) between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013. Bleeding complication was defined as any transfusion, any hemorrhage or hematoma, or the need for percutaneous or surgical intervention to control the bleeding event. Health care costs were determined by multiplying the total charge for each visit by the cost to charge ratios reported for each hospital code in the database. Data were collected from the database on April 29, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adjusted association between bleeding complications and mortality was determined by multivariable logistic regression. Length of stay and total health care costs were compared using multivariable linear regression between patients who did and patients who did not have bleeding complications. Results: Bleeding complications occurred in 3128 patients (17.7%) (1984 men and 1144 women, with a mean [SD] age of 75.6 [11.9] years). Bleeding was associated with higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.27-3.22; P < .001) and longer hospital stay (adjusted multiplicative difference, 2.14; 95% CI, 2.06-2.16; P < .001). Median (interquartile range) total health care costs were $48â¯663 ($32â¯620-$71â¯547) for patients with bleeding complications compared with $29â¯968 ($21â¯924-$43â¯287) for patients without a bleeding complication (adjusted multiplicative difference, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.52-1.59; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Periprocedural bleeding was common among patients who underwent transcatheter intervention using large-bore catheters and was associated with a statistically significant increase in mortality, length of stay, and cost.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Implantación de Prótesis , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Transfusión Sanguínea/economía , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Catéteres Cardíacos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Corazón Auxiliar , Hematoma/economía , Hematoma/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Análisis Multivariante , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Pronóstico , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Although associations between transfusion and inferior outcomes have been documented, there is a lack of blood transfusion standardization in cardiac surgery. At the Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, a multidisciplinary, criterion-driven algorithm for transfusion management was implemented. We examined the effect of our blood conservation protocol on transfusion rates and outcomes after cardiac surgery and on stability of transfusion over time. METHODS: Patients undergoing first-time cardiac surgery from 2006 (full year before protocol) were compared with those in 2009 (after protocol) and propensity score matched to improve balance. Data were prospectively collected. Stability of transfusion incidence also was compared (2005-2006 vs 2008-2014). RESULTS: After matching, 890 patients from each year were included. Use of blood products decreased from 54% in 2006 to 25% in 2009 (P < .001). Patients in 2009 had a lower incidence of postoperative renal failure (2.6% vs 4%, P = .04), reoperations for bleeding (2% vs 4%, P = .004), and readmissions at less than 30 days (6% vs 12%, P < .001). No differences were found for operative mortality, deep sternal wound infection, or permanent strokes. Patients in 2009 had greater improvement in physical (P = .001) and mental (P = .02) quality of life than patients in 2006. Reduction of blood products led to significant cost savings for packed erythrocytes (P < .001) and platelets (P < .001). After protocol implementation, transfusion incidence remained 30% or less, with less than 28% in most years. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary blood conservation program can significantly control blood transfusion rates, improve outcomes, and be sustained over time. Efforts are needed to implement evidence-based protocols to standardize and decrease blood use in cardiac surgery to improve outcomes and reduce cost.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Transfusión Sanguínea/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cardiopatías/cirugía , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Cuidados Posoperatorios/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise studies comparing benefits and harms in women with benign disease without prolapse undergoing hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) versus laparoscopy. STUDY DESIGN: We followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs) and cohort studies comparing NOTES with laparoscopy assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) or total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in women bound to undergo removal of a non-prolapsed uterus for benign disease. Two authors searched and selected studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias independently. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion or arbitration. RESULTS: We did not find RCTs but retrieved two retrospective cohort studies comparing NOTES with LAVH. The study quality as assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was acceptable. Both studies reported no conversions. The operative time in women treated by NOTES was shorter compared to LAVH: the mean difference (MD) was -22.04min (95% CI -28.00min to -16.08min; 342 women; 2 studies). There were no differences for complications in women treated by NOTES compared to LAVH: the risk ratio (RR) was 0.57 (95% CI 0.17-1.91; 342 women; 2 studies). The length of stay was shorter in women treated by NOTES versus LAVH: the MD was -0.42days (95% CI -0.59days to -0.25days; 342 women; 2 studies). There were no differences for the median VAS scores at 12h between women treated by NOTES (median 2, range 0-6) or by LAVH (median 2, range 0-6) (48 women, 1 study). There were no differences in the median additional analgesic dose request in women treated by NOTES (median 0, range 0-6) or by LAVH (median 1, range 0-5) (48 women, 1 study). The hospital charges for treatment by NOTES were higher compared to LAVH: the mean difference was 137.00 (95% CI 88.95-185.05 ; 294 women; 1 study). CONCLUSIONS: At the present NOTES should be considered as a technique under evaluation for use in gynaecological surgery. RCTs are needed to demonstrate its effectiveness.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades Uterinas/cirugía , Adulto , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Femenino , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/economía , Precios de Hospital , Humanos , Histerectomía/economía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/economía , Tiempo de Internación , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/terapia , Enfermedades Uterinas/economíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Lung transplantation is associated with high rates of bleeding and frequent blood transfusion. The authors aimed to determine if point-of-care coagulation testing (POCCT) reduced transfusion requirements. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: A before-and-after cohort analysis conducted at a single tertiary referral center. Ninety-three sequential adult patients between January 2010 and January 2014 undergoing isolated lung transplant without preoperative extracorporeal support were analyzed. INTERVENTION: ROTEM and multi-plate POCCT were introduced on July 1, 2012, with an associated algorithm based on the results. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Statistically significant decreases in the proportion of patients receiving PRBCs (87% v 65%; p = 0.015), FFP (72% v 30%; p<0.0001) and platelets (70% v 37%; p = 0.002) were found after the intervention. There were small decreases in median chest tube blood loss at 2 hours (300 mLs v 215 mLs; p = 0.03) and 4 hours (440 mLs v 350 mLs; p = 0.050) but not at 12 hours postoperatively. There were no changes in reoperation for bleeding (9% v 4%; p = 0.158) or in-hospital mortality (6% v 2%; p = 0.617). The cost of blood products administered decreased from a median of $3,935.00 to $991.00 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of POCCT in lung-transplant surgery is associated with significant reductions in blood product use and cost. There were no detectable changes in outcome aside from a small decrease in early postoperative bleeding.