RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Comparing between the visual outcomes and post operative complications of two surgical treatments for sub macular hemorrhage, pars plana vitrectomy with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) injection procedure, and pneumatic displacement of submacular hemorrhage with intravitreal tPA injection. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with sub macular hemorrhage (SMH) was performed. Data was collected from 150 patients with sub macular hemorrhage. Patients were followed up from the day of admission and up to a year post surgery. Evaluation included visual acuity, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus examination and rates of complications. RESULTS: Pars plana vitrectomy procedure has showed a better visual outcome in small SMH. Comparing complications between the two treatment modalities, no significant difference has been found in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Pars plana vitrectomy and tPA showed a clear advantage with a trend of better visual acuity as well as a significant predictor to better visual acuity for small and medium sub macular hemorrhage.
Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Hemorragia Retiniana , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Agudeza Visual , Vitrectomía , Humanos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Vitrectomía/métodos , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Hemorragia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of submacular hemorrhage (SMH) displacement using pneumatic displacement with intravitreal expansile gas versus pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with subretinal injection of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, and air as primary surgery. METHODS: Retrospective interventional case series of 63 patients who underwent surgical displacement of SMH secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) from May 1, 2015, to October 31, 2022. Medical records were reviewed for diagnosis, logMAR visual acuity (VA), central subfield thickness (CST), and postoperative displacement rates and complications up to 12 months after operation. RESULTS: The diagnosis was nAMD in 24 (38.1%) and PCV in 39 (61.9%) eyes. There were 40 (63.5%) eyes in the pneumatic displacement group (38 received C3F8, 2 received SF6) and 23 (36.5%) eyes in the subretinal cocktail injection. Mean baseline VA was 1.46 and 1.62, respectively (p = 0.404). The subretinal injection group had more extensive SMH (p = 0.005), thicker CST (1,006.6 µm vs. 780.2 µm, p = 0.012), and longer interval between symptom and operation (10.65 vs. 5.53 days, p < 0.001). The mean postoperative VA at 6 months was 0.67 and 0.91 (p = 0.180) for pneumatic displacement and subretinal injection groups, respectively, though VA was significantly better in the pneumatic group at 12-month visit (0.64 vs. 1.03, p = 0.040). At least 10 mean change in VA were >10 letters gain in both groups up to 12 months. Postoperative CST reduction was greater (625.1 µm vs. 326.5 µm, p = 0.008) and complete foveal displacement (87.0% vs. 37.5%), p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] = 11.1) and displacement to arcade or beyond (52.5% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.009, OR = 5.15) were more frequent in the subretinal injection group. Two patients with failed pneumatic displacement were successfully treated with subretinal cocktail injection as a second operation. CONCLUSION: Surgical displacement of SMH leads to clinically meaningful improvement in VA. PPV with subretinal cocktail injection is more effective than pneumatic displacement in displacing SMH with similar safety profile despite longer interval before operation, higher CST, and more extensive SMH at baseline. Retinal surgeons could consider this novel technique in cases with thick and extensive SMH or as a rescue secondary operation in selected cases.
Asunto(s)
Endotaponamiento , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Hemorragia Retiniana , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Agudeza Visual , Vitrectomía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Hemorragia Retiniana/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Vitrectomía/métodos , Anciano , Endotaponamiento/métodos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Angiografía con Fluoresceína/métodos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/terapia , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/complicaciones , Fondo de Ojo , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Fluorocarburos/administración & dosificación , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hexafluoruro de Azufre/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible vision loss among individuals aged 65 years and older in the USA. For individuals diagnosed with AMD, approximately 12% experience varying levels of subretinal hemorrhage (SRH), which can be further classified by size into small, medium, and massive measured in disc diameters. SRH is an acute and rare sight-threatening complication characterized by an accumulation of blood under the retina arising from the choroidal or retinal circulation. Released iron toxins, reduced nutrient supply, fibrin meshwork contraction, and outer retinal shear forces created by SRH contribute to visual loss, macular scarring, and photoreceptor damage. SRH treatment strategies aim to displace hemorrhage from the foveal region and prevent further bleeding. Although there are no standardized treatment protocols for SRH, several surgical and nonsurgical therapeutical approaches may be employed. The most common surgical approaches that have been utilized are pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with multiple maneuvers such as the removal of choroidal neovascularization lesions, macular translocation, retinal pigment epithelium patch repair, SRH drainage, intravitreal injection of recombinant-tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), expansile gas and air displacement, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections. Nonsurgical therapeutical approaches include intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy, intravitreal tPA administration without PPV, and photodynamic therapy. This review article aims to explore the current treatment strategies and supporting literature regarding both surgical and nonsurgical, of SRH in patients with AMD. Moreover, this article also aims to highlight the distinct treatment modalities corresponding to different sizes of SRH.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Humanos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Retiniana/etiología , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Retina , Degeneración Macular/complicaciones , Degeneración Macular/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular/terapia , Vitrectomía/métodos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
We present the case of an infant who received bevacizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and developed retinal hemorrhages 12 weeks later. Although preretinal hemorrhages along the ROP's ridge were a concern for recurrence, we decided to investigate other etiologies because of numerous retinal hemorrhages in different retinal layers and their concentration in the posterior pole. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging revealed a new-onset subdural hemorrhage. Factors that were suspicious for trauma were identified in the detailed history taken from the family by the hospital's child abuse team. This case highlights the importance of considering the characteristics of retinal hemorrhages in infants with ROP and conducting any necessary investigation.
Asunto(s)
Retinopatía de la Prematuridad , Síndrome del Bebé Sacudido , Recién Nacido , Niño , Lactante , Humanos , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Síndrome del Bebé Sacudido/complicaciones , Síndrome del Bebé Sacudido/tratamiento farmacológico , Retinopatía de la Prematuridad/cirugía , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Coagulación con Láser/efectos adversos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Edad GestacionalRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical features, treatment options, and visual outcomes of submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: A retrospective, observational case series. METHODS: Setting: Multicenter institutional setting. Patient Population: A total of 127 patients (127 eyes; 88 men, 39 women; (mean age, 74.2 years)) diagnosed with AMD-associated SMHs exceeding 2 disc diameters involving the fovea. Observation: The AMD types, previous treatments, treatment options, anatomic findings, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were assessed. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical features, treatment options, and visual outcomes of SMHs secondary to nAMD. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes had typical AMD, 94 eyes polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and one eye retinal angiomatous proliferation. Eighty-five eyes were treatment-naïve; 42 eyes were treated previously: anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy (n = 26), photodynamic therapy (n = 3), and combined therapy (n = 13). Treatment of SMHs included vitrectomy (36 eyes), pneumatic displacement (49 eyes), and anti-VEGF monotherapy (42 eyes). The final BCVA improved significantly in treatment-naïve cases from 0.86 to 0.62 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) unit (Snellen equivalent from 20/145 to 20/83) and from 0.80 to 0.56 (Snellen equivalent from 20/126 to 20/73) in PCV cases. Meanwhile, the BCVA logMAR values improved from 1.15 to 0.75 (Snellen equivalent from 20/283 to 20/112) and from 0.87 to 0.63 (Snellen equivalent from 20/148 to 20/85) in eyes that underwent vitrectomy or pneumatic displacement, respectively. In eyes with BCVAs between 20/133 to 20/40 at SMH onset, the final VA in the pneumatic displacement group was better than in the anti-VEGF monotherapy group. One eye had a retinal detachment and 1 eye had a macular hole in the vitrectomy group, and 5 eyes had a vitreous hemorrhage in the pneumatic displacement group. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended treatment for SMHs secondary to nAMD exceeding 2 disc area and with BCVA below 20/40 is vitrectomy or pneumatic displacement for visual improvement.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular/terapia , Masculino , Pronóstico , Hemorragia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Retiniana/etiología , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Tomografía de Coherencia ÓpticaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate a sequential approach of pneumatic displacement followed by vitrectomy (pars plana vitrectomy) in failed cases to deal with submacular hemorrhage (SMH) of various etiologies. METHODS: Retrospective, nonrandomized interventional case series of consecutive patients with SMH of up to 2 weeks' duration, who were treated with a stepwise approach. Step 1 involved intravitreal injection of 0.3 mL 100% C3F8 and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator 50 µg/0.1 mL. If unsuccessful, a prompt pars plana vitrectomy with subretinal recombinant tissue plasminogen activator 50 µg/0.1 mL and 20% SF6 gas tamponade was performed as a second attempt to displace the SMH. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with SMH underwent pneumatic displacement; 24 (77.4%) had a successful outcome without further intervention. The mean presenting visual acuity of the "successful cohort" was 1.34 logMAR (20/440 Snellen), improving to 0.83 logMAR (20/135 Snellen) 1 month after treatment. Five of the seven patients with failed pneumatic displacement underwent pars plana vitrectomy with subretinal recombinant tissue plasminogen activator at an average of 5 days poststep 1, with successful SMH displacement in 3 patients, giving an overall success of 87.1% for this treatment protocol. CONCLUSION: A sequential approach of expansile gas injection followed by prompt pars plana vitrectomy, aided by recombinant tissue plasminogen activator at both steps, is a coherent, logical pathway to treat SMH with high anatomical and functional success.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Angiografía con Fluoresceína/métodos , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Mácula Lútea/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Vitrectomía/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Endotaponamiento/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fondo de Ojo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad/tendencias , Hemorragia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Retiniana/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Agudeza Visual , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report a case of hemorrhagic occlusive retinal vasculitis after cataract surgery. METHODS: A 74-year-old woman presented with blurry vision and distorted vision, which started 2 days after an uncomplicated cataract surgery in the left eye. Intracameral vancomycin was injected during the case. The patient reported being treated with systemic vancomycin in the past. RESULTS: The visual acuity was 20/80 in the left eye. She had trace cells in the anterior chamber with no hypopyon and intraocular lens implant within the capsular bag in the left eye. Dilated fundus examination revealed no vitritis, There were large patches of peripheral retinal hemorrhages and retinal ischemia. The patient was diagnosed with hemorrhagic occlusive retinal vasculitis likely secondary to hypersensitivity reaction to intracameral vancomycin. The patient was started on oral prednisone, and the topical difluprednate course was escalated. Within 3 weeks, vision improved to 20/30 in the left eye. She underwent pan retinal photocoagulation targeting the ischemic areas in the periphery. CONCLUSION: The patient had previous exposure to systemic vancomycin, which may have sensitized her immune system. Later on, the hypersensitivity reaction took place after exposure to intracameral vancomycin during cataract surgery. Our hemorrhagic occlusive retinal vasculitis case had a favorable visual outcome, and recognition of this entity will ensure that vancomycin will not be used for infection prophylaxis in the fellow eye at the time of cataract surgery.
Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Retiniana/inducido químicamente , Vasculitis Retiniana/inducido químicamente , Vasos Retinianos/patología , Vancomicina/efectos adversos , Agudeza Visual , Administración Oral , Anciano , Femenino , Angiografía con Fluoresceína/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fondo de Ojo , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraoculares/efectos adversos , Coagulación con Láser/métodos , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Reoperación , Hemorragia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Vasculitis Retiniana/diagnóstico , Vasculitis Retiniana/terapia , Vancomicina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To characterize the timing of large submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) relative to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective, consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 46 eyes of 46 patients with large SMH resulting from neovascular AMD selected to undergo pars plana vitrectomy with subretinal tissue plasminogen activator at the Mid Atlantic Retina group of the Wills Eye Hospital. METHODS: Patient charts were reviewed to identify baseline characteristics and anti-VEGF treatment details. OCT was used to evaluate pigmented epithelial detachments, SMH, and subretinal fluid before and after SMH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The timing of SMH in relation to last anti-VEGF injection, the anti-VEGF treatment status (i.e., naive, stable, or recently extended or shortened) at the time of SMH, and the length of the anti-VEGF treatment interval at the time of bleeding. RESULTS: Submacular hemorrhage occurred in 15 patients (36%) who were treatment naive. In patients treated with anti-VEGF, 19 (45%) had a stable treatment interval, 5 (12%) had a recently extended interval, and 3 (7%) had a shortened interval. The average treatment interval at the time of SMH was 6.8 weeks with a median of 7 total injections before SMH. Seven treated patients (26%) experience an SMH while having a 4-week dosing interval. The average time between last injection and SMH was 29 days. Forty-eight percent of patients treated with anti-VEGF agents experienced an SMH within 30 days of anti-VEGF injection. Chi-square analysis found SMH more likely to occur within 30 days of anti-VEGF injection than after 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Large SMH in neovascular AMD in a treat-and-extend regimen does not seem to be associated with prolonged dosing intervals or recent interval extension, and a large proportion of such hemorrhages are likely to be a result of mechanisms other than loss of effective VEGF inhibition.
Asunto(s)
Fóvea Central/irrigación sanguínea , Ranibizumab/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Retiniana/inducido químicamente , Agudeza Visual , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/complicaciones , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fondo de Ojo , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Ranibizumab/administración & dosificación , Hemorragia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Vitrectomía , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/terapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of vitrectomy, subretinal tissue plasminogen activator (TPA), and gas with and without subretinal air versus Intravitreal TPA and gas in the treatment of submacular haemorrhage (SMH) due to Neovascular age related macular degeneration. METHODS: We analysed the notes of 29 cases presented with SMH in the period between 01/2016 and 09/2018 at James Cook University Hospital. Presenting visual acuity (BCVA), size and location of SMH, Procedure done, final BCVA at 6 months and any surgical complications were recorded. 11 Cases (Group 1) received intravitreal TPA (50 µg in 0.1 ML), 0.3 ml of pure sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). 18 cases (Group 2) received 23 G Pars Plana vitrectomy, Subretinal TPA injection (25 µg in 0.1 ml), and 20% SF6 gas filling. Group 2 was further divided into 2A (10 patients) who received only subretinal TPA and group 2B (8 patients) who received additional 0.1 ml subretinal air. RESULTS: The mean BCVA at presentation was 0.0068 in group 1 and 0.0067 in group 2 (p = 0.8734). The mean postoperative BCVA at 6 months was 0.31 in group 1 and 0.58 in group 2 (p = 0.0015). Subgroup analysis of group 2 didn't show statistically significant difference in outcome when adding subretinal air to the vitrectomy procedure (p = 0.7009). CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy, gas and subretinal TPA has more successful displacement rate and better visual outcome than Intravitreal TPA & Gas alone in treating SMH involving the fovea in age-related macular degeneration. Additional subretinal air doesn't seem to improve the outcome in cases having vitrectomy.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Endotaponamiento , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Humanos , Degeneración Macular/complicaciones , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , VitrectomíaAsunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Pancitopenia/etiología , Hemorragia Retiniana/etiología , Adulto , Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos , COVID-19/patología , COVID-19/terapia , Humanos , Terapia por Láser , Masculino , Pancitopenia/patología , Pancitopenia/terapia , Hemorragia Retiniana/patología , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
SIGNIFICANCE: Amiodarone is an excellent antiarrhythmic medication; however, it has numerous systemic and ocular adverse effects. PURPOSE: We aimed to improve our understanding of amiodarone and its ocular adverse effects by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of published case reports. METHODS: This systematic review was reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. We used the MEDLINE database, primarily through PubMed, and used keywords (amiodarone, eye, eye diseases, visual/ocular adverse effects/manifestations) to identify case reports of ocular adverse effects after amiodarone use. The initial search resulted in 92 total case reports. However, after excluding nonrelevant case reports, 25 cases were selected for the final analysis. RESULTS: Among the patients in the 25 case reports, 18 were male (72%), and the median age was 66 ± 9.9 years. In 15 cases (60%), the patients reported halos around light and/or decrease in vision after amiodarone use. The most common ophthalmic examination findings were cornea verticillata/vortex keratopathy in 19 cases (76%), followed by different patterns of papilledema and retinal hemorrhages in 5 cases (20%). Discontinuation of amiodarone was the most common intervention, followed by application of topical heparin. Outcomes among case reports were variable. CONCLUSIONS: Cornea verticillata/vortex keratopathy was the most common ocular adverse effect in cases where amiodarone was administered. Early recognition of amiodarone-induced ocular adverse effects is imperative to prevent worsening keratopathy or uncommon adverse effects. Collaboration between physicians prescribing amiodarone-to recognize the ocular symptoms-and referral to eye care physicians are important.
Asunto(s)
Amiodarona/efectos adversos , Antiarrítmicos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Córnea/inducido químicamente , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Papiledema/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Retiniana/inducido químicamente , Trastornos de la Visión/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedades de la Córnea/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Córnea/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Papiledema/diagnóstico , Papiledema/terapia , Hemorragia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Trastornos de la Visión/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Visión/terapiaRESUMEN
Peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy (PEHCR) is a rare retinal vasculopathy that might cause subretinal and/or vitreous hemorrhages. Although the primary etiology is still unknown, choroidal neovascularization is mainly involved in the pathogenesis. The main risk factors are age and systemic hypertension. Ancillary testing such as fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography and ultrasonography can be of great value for diagnosing this entity and distinguishing PEHCR from other lesions as choroidal melanoma and retinal vasoproliferative tumor. Various treatments have been reported including photocoagulation, cryotherapy, intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (Anti-VEGF) and surgical intervention as pars plana vitrectomy. This review handles an up-to-date perspective regarding PEHCR.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Retiniana/etiología , Hemorragia Vítrea/etiología , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Colorantes/administración & dosificación , Crioterapia , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Humanos , Verde de Indocianina/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Coagulación con Láser , Hemorragia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Ultrasonografía , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Vitrectomía , Hemorragia Vítrea/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Vítrea/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Macular hemorrhages result in a sudden and profound loss of vision. The primary treatment modalities include observation, intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs, neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet hialoidotomy, intravitreal injection of gas with or without tissue plasminogen activator, as monotherapy or combined with surgery. In this paper, we report four cases of macular hemorrhages of different causes treated with different approaches, and we review the literature in this regard. CASE PRESENTATION: All four patients presented different causes of macular hemorrhage. The first case had a preretinal hemorrhage due to a Valsalva retinopathy and was treated with surgery. Case 2 had a multilevel macular hemorrhage due to a rupture of a retinal arteriolar macroaneurysm and was treated with pneumatic displacement, laser, and intravitreal ranibizumab. Case 3 presented an extensive subretinal hemorrhage due to a choroidal rupture after high-energy ocular trauma that was also successfully treated with surgery. The last case was a preretinal hemorrhage due to diabetic retinopathy managed with neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser. Different treatment approaches were successfully performed in all cases with good outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is an extensive range of options available for the management of macular hemorrhages, and the best option depends on the characteristics of each particular case. Proper and timely management of these diseases can achieve an excellent visual outcome, especially if the location of the hemorrhage is preretinal.
INTRODUCCIÓN: Las hemorragias maculares producen una pérdida de la visión súbita y profunda. Las principales modalidades de tratamiento incluyen observación, inyección intravítrea de fármacos antiangiogénicos, hialoidotomía con láser neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet, inyección intravítrea de gas y/o activador de plasminógeno tisular, en monoterapia o combinadas con cirugía. En el presente trabajo reportamos cuatro casos de hemorragias maculares de distintas causas, tratadas con diferentes abordajes, y realizamos una revisión de la literatura al respecto. PRESENTACIÓN DE CASOS: Los cuatro pacientes mostrados presentaron diferentes causas de hemorragias maculares. El primer caso tuvo una hemorragia prerretiniana debido a retinopatía de Valsalva y fue tratado con cirugía, el Caso 2 tuvo una hemorragia macular multinivel debido a una rotura de un macroaneurisma arteriolar retiniano y fue manejado con desplazamiento neumático, láser y ranibizumab intravítreo, el Caso 3 presentó una hemorragia subretiniana extensa debido a rotura coroidea posterior a un trauma ocular cerrado de alta energía y fue tratado exitosamente con cirugía. El último caso presentó una hemorragia prerretiniana debido a retinopatía diabética, manejada con láser neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet. Los diferentes tratamientos fueron realizados exitosamente con buenos resultados. CONCLUSIÓN: Existen amplias opciones disponibles para el manejo de las hemorragias maculares y la mejor opción depende de las características de cada caso en particular. El manejo apropiado y oportuno de éstas puede lograr un resultado visual bueno, especialmente si la localización de la hemorragia es prerretiniana.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Terapia por Láser , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Coroides/patología , Retinopatía Diabética/complicaciones , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Hemorragia Retiniana/etiología , Rotura , Activador de Tejido PlasminógenoRESUMEN
INTRODUCCIÓN: Las hemorragias maculares producen una pérdida de la visión súbita y profunda. Las principales modalidades de tratamiento incluyen observación, inyección intravítrea de fármacos antiangiogénicos, hialoidotomía con láser neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet, inyección intravítrea de gas y/o activador de plasminógeno tisular, en monoterapia o combinadas con cirugía. En el presente trabajo reportamos cuatro casos de hemorragias maculares de distintas causas, tratadas con diferentes abordajes, y realizamos una revisión de la literatura al respecto. PRESENTACIÓN DE CASOS: Los cuatro pacientes mostrados presentaron diferentes causas de hemorragias maculares. El primer caso tuvo una hemorragia prerretiniana debido a retinopatía de Valsalva y fue tratado con cirugía, el Caso 2 tuvo una hemorragia macular multinivel debido a una rotura de un macroaneurisma arteriolar retiniano y fue manejado con desplazamiento neumático, láser y ranibizumab intravítreo, el Caso 3 presentó una hemorragia subretiniana extensa debido a rotura coroidea posterior a un trauma ocular cerrado de alta energía y fue tratado exitosamente con cirugía. El último caso presentó una hemorragia prerretiniana debido a retinopatía diabética, manejada con láser neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet. Los diferentes tratamientos fueron realizados exitosamente con buenos resultados. CONCLUSIÓN: Existen amplias opciones disponibles para el manejo de las hemorragias maculares y la mejor opción depende de las características de cada caso en particular. El manejo apropiado y oportuno de éstas puede lograr un resultado visual bueno, especialmente si la localización de la hemorragia es prerretiniana.
INTRODUCTION: Macular hemorrhages result in a sudden and profound loss of vision. The primary treatment modalities include observation, intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs, neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet hialoidotomy, intravitreal injection of gas with or without tissue plasminogen activator, as monotherapy or combined with surgery. In this paper, we report four cases of macular hemorrhages of different causes treated with different approaches, and we review the literature in this regard. CASE PRESENTATION: All four patients presented different causes of macular hemorrhage. The first case had a preretinal hemorrhage due to a Valsalva retinopathy and was treated with surgery. Case 2 had a multilevel macular hemorrhage due to a rupture of a retinal arteriolar macroaneurysm and was treated with pneumatic displacement, laser, and intravitreal ranibizumab. Case 3 presented an extensive subretinal hemorrhage due to a choroidal rupture after high-energy ocular trauma that was also successfully treated with surgery. The last case was a preretinal hemorrhage due to diabetic retinopathy managed with neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser. Different treatment approaches were successfully performed in all cases with good outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is an extensive range of options available for the management of macular hemorrhages, and the best option depends on the characteristics of each particular case. Proper and timely management of these diseases can achieve an excellent visual outcome, especially if the location of the hemorrhage is preretinal.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Terapia por Láser , Rotura , Hemorragia Retiniana/etiología , Coroides/patología , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Retinopatía Diabética/complicaciones , Inyecciones IntravítreasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) and sulphur hexafluoride gas (SF6) intravitreal injection for the displacement of large submacular haemorrhages (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration and for guiding the selection of additional treatments or observations for choroidal neovascularization (CNV). METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients with recent-onset, large SMH, treated at Sacro Cuore Hospital from January 2004 to May 2016, were retrospectively analysed. All eyes underwent a 0.05-mL intravitreal injection of 50 µg rtPA, 0.3 mL of 100% SF6, and then face-down positioning. Afterwards, the eyes received additional treatments for CNV or observation, based on the severity and extent of the underlying pathology. The multimodal imaging features revealed after blood displacement were analysed and then correlated to the treatment selected as a second therapeutic option. RESULTS: A total of 96 eyes met the inclusion criteria and was evaluated in this study. SMH was displaced from the fovea in the majority of the eyes (76%), allowing several diagnostic tools to evaluate the underlying macular features. In 19 cases (19.8%) exhibiting severe macular damage, no additional treatment was applied. In the remaining eyes, subsequent treatments included anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (44.8%), photodynamic therapy (n = 2), and submacular surgery (35.4%). Statistically significant correlations were found between the macular findings revealed after blood displacement and the additional treatments or observations selected for the underlying disease. The mean follow-up was 35 months. Improvements in visual acuity were statistically significant up to 3 years. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal rtPA and gas injection was found to be effective for the displacement of large SMH, allowing postoperative diagnostic testing, and thus guiding the opportunity to apply further treatments. The addition of subsequent individualized treatments may allow long-term visual gain in selected cases.
Asunto(s)
Neovascularización Coroidal/complicaciones , Endotaponamiento , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Hexafluoruro de Azufre/administración & dosificación , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neovascularización Coroidal/diagnóstico , Neovascularización Coroidal/fisiopatología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Posición Prona , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Hemorragia Retiniana/etiología , Hemorragia Retiniana/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Vitrectomía , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study compared the visual outcome after pneumatic displacement of submacular hemorrhage among patients with different subtypes of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 67 patients (67 eyes) who underwent treatment for submacular hemorrhage associated with AMD. All the patients underwent pneumatic displacement. Demographic parameters, visual acuity, and anatomical features were analyzed among AMD subtypes: typical AMD, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). RESULTS: Among the eyes with submacular hemorrhage, 24, 30, and 13 eyes had typical AMD, PCV, and RAP, respectively. Post-treatment best-corrected visual acuity was best in the PCV group and worst in the RAP group (P < 0.001). The proportion of eyes with improved visual acuity was highest in the PCV subtype and lowest in the RAP subtype (P = 0.044). Logistic regression analysis showed that AMD subtype (P = 0.016) and time to treatment (<7 days) (P = 0.037) are associated with the final visual outcome. CONCLUSION: The final post-treatment visual outcome after the incidence of submacular hemorrhage was best in the PCV group and worst in the RAP group. Age-related macular degeneration subtype is a significant factor associated with the visual prognosis of submacular hemorrhage.
Asunto(s)
Neovascularización Coroidal/clasificación , Endotaponamiento , Fluorocarburos/administración & dosificación , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/clasificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Neovascularización Coroidal/tratamiento farmacológico , Neovascularización Coroidal/fisiopatología , Femenino , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Hemorragia Retiniana/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Posición Supina , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate anatomical and functional outcomes of surgical displacement of macular hemorrhages complicating exsudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) after vitrectomy, subretinal rtPA (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) injection, intravitreal bevacizumab injection and gaz tamponade. METHODS: Retrospective case series, including 26 patients with submacular hemorrhage, who underwent a surgical displacement within 15 days after the onset of symptoms. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was carried out to measure the diameter of the hemorrhage and to specify the relation with retinal pigment epithelium. Anatomical success was defined as a total displacement of the hemorrhage away from the fovea at first postoperative visit. Visual acuity improvement was measured at 1 and 6 months and at final postoperative visit. RESULTS: The procedure resulted in hemorrhage displacement away from the fovea in 20 eyes (81%). Visual acuity significantly improved by 5,8 (±7,2) lines (P=0.0003) at 1 month postoperatively, 7,4 (±6,7) lines (P=0.0004) at 6 months and 7,4 (±7,4) lines (P=0.0002) at final postoperative visit (16,5±19,8 months). There was an inverse correlation between hemorrhage diameter and final acuity improvement (Pearson correlation coefficient P=-0.60 (IC 95% [-0.81; -0.26]; P=0.002)). CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy with subretinal rtPA injection was found to be effective for the displacement of AMD hemorrhage in 81 % of the patients. Mean final visual acuity improved by more than 7 lines.
Asunto(s)
Hematoma/terapia , Degeneración Macular/terapia , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Vitrectomía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Hematoma/complicaciones , Hematoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Hematoma/cirugía , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraoculares , Degeneración Macular/complicaciones , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular/cirugía , Masculino , Datos Preliminares , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Retiniana/complicaciones , Hemorragia Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia Retiniana/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitrectomía/efectos adversos , Vitrectomía/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Peripheral exudative haemorrhagic chorioretinopathy (PEHCR) is a rare disorder that is often misdiagnosed. The aim of this study was to better characterise PEHCR and to assess treatment options. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective multicentric chart review. RESULTS: Of 84 eyes (69 patients) with PEHCR referred between 2005 and 2017, the most common referral diagnosis was choroidal melanoma (41.3%). Bilateral involvement was found in 21.7% of cases. Haemorrhagic retinal pigment epithelium detachment was the most common peripheral lesion (53.6%). Maculopathy was associated with peripheral lesions in 65.8% of cases. PEHCR lesions were mostly heterogeneous (58.8%) on B-scan ultrasonography. Choroidal neovascularisation was found in 10 eyes (26.3%) out of 38 eyes that underwent fluorescein angiography. Polyps were observed in 14 eyes (58.3%) out of 24 eyes that underwent indocyanine green angiography. Fifty-one eyes were treated (62.2%). Intravitreal injections (IVTI) of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were the most used treatment (36.6%) before laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy, vitrectomy and cryotherapy. Only vitrectomy improved visual acuity. Most lesions (65.6%) regressed at the last follow-up visit. CONCLUSION: In case of PEHCR, multimodal imaging is useful to avoid misdiagnosis, to characterise PEHCR lesions and to guide treatment strategies. Regression of PEHCR lesions was observed in two-thirds of the patients. Vitrectomy improved visual acuity. More than a third of patients underwent anti-VEGF IVTI. Further studies are needed to assess IVTI's efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades de la Coroides/diagnóstico , Crioterapia/métodos , Angiografía con Fluoresceína/métodos , Coagulación con Láser/métodos , Hemorragia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades de la Coroides/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Coroides/terapia , Femenino , Fondo de Ojo , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Retiniana/etiología , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) presenting with (group 1) or without (group 2) fovea-involving intraretinal hemorrhage (IRH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients diagnosed with acute, treatment-naïve CRVO between January 2009 and July 2016. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen (39.8%) of 289 CRVO eyes had fovea-involving IRH. At baseline, eyes in group 1 had significantly worse visual acuity (VA) (1.2 ± 0.10 logMAR vs. 0.9 ± 0.06 logMAR; P = .001) and greater central subfield thickness (CST) (610.4 µm ± 35.9 µm vs. 435.0 µm + 21.6 µm; P < .001) than eyes in group 2. Final visual outcomes were comparable between groups (1.24 ± 0.09 logMAR vs. 1.02 ± 0.08 logMAR; P = .08). Group 1 received a significantly greater number of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections during the first year (7.80 ± 0.40 vs. 5.20 ± 0.40; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although treatment-naïve eyes with acute CRVO and fovea-involving IRH had worse VA and greater CST at presentation, the final VA was comparable to eyes without such a hemorrhage. Eyes with foveal IRH had a greater treatment burden in the first 12 months. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:752-759.].
Asunto(s)
Fóvea Central/patología , Hemorragia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Coagulación con Láser , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Multimodal , Hemorragia Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia Retiniana/cirugía , Hemorragia Retiniana/terapia , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/cirugía , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Agudeza Visual/fisiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report a case of patient who presented with valsalva retinopathy after genral anesthesia for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysm. OBSERVATION: A forty year-old man presented, after a general anesthesia for treatment of a ruptured intracranial aneurysm, with a severe decrease of the visual acuity in the left eye. Ophthalmic examination, performed one month after surgery showed a retrohyaloid macular hemorhage. After failure of laser Nd-YAG hyaloidotomy, vitrectomy allowed drainage of the hematoma with good visual outcome. CONCLUSION: Valsalva retinopathy is a rare complication that can occur after genral anesthesia. Vitrectomy may be needed if Nd-Yag laser hyaloidotomy fails.