A safety and feasibility analysis on the use of cold-stored platelets in combat trauma.

BACKGROUND: Damage-control resuscitation has come full circle, with the use of whole blood and balanced components. Lack of platelet availability may limit effective damage-control resuscitation. Platelets are typically stored and transfused at room temperature and have a short shelf-life, while cold-stored platelets (CSPs) have the advantage of a longer shelf-life. The US military introduced CSPs into the battlefield surgical environment in 2016. This study is a safety analysis for the use of CSPs in battlefield trauma. METHODS: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry and Armed Services Blood Program databases were queried to identify casualties who received room-temperature-stored platelets (RSPs) or both RSPs and CSPs between January 1, 2016, and February 29, 2020. Characteristics of recipients of RSPs and RSPs-CSPs were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients were identified; 131 (47.8%) received RSPs and 143 (52.2%) received RSPs-CSPs. The casualties were mostly male (97.1%), similar in age (31.7 years), with a median Injury Severity Score of 22. There was no difference in survival for recipients of RSPs (88.5%) versus RSPs-CSPs (86.7%; p = 0.645). Adverse events were similar between the two cohorts. Blood products received were higher in the RSPs-CSPs cohort compared with the RSPs cohort. The RSPs-CSPs cohort had more massive transfusion (53.5% vs. 33.5%, p = 0.001). A logistic regression model demonstrated that use of RSPs-CSPs was not associated with mortality, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.96 (p > 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-2.25). CONCLUSION: In this safety analysis of RSPs-CSPs compared with RSPs in a combat setting, survival was similar between the two groups. Given the safety and logistical feasibility, the results support continued use of CSPs in military environments and further research into how to optimize resuscitation strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

The thin red line: Blood planning factors and the enduring need for a robust military blood system to support combat operations.

ABSTRACT: Battlefield lessons learned are forgotten; the current name for this is the Walker Dip. Blood transfusion and the need for a Department of Defense Blood Program are lessons that have cycled through being learned during wartime, forgotten, and then relearned during the next war. The military will always need a blood program to support combat and contingency operations. Also, blood supply to the battlefield has planning factors that have been consistent over a century. In 2024, it is imperative that we codify these lessons learned. The linchpins of modern combat casualty care are optimal prehospital care, early whole blood transfusion, and forward surgical care. This current opinion comprised of authors from all three military Services, the Joint Trauma System, the Armed Services Blood Program, blood SMEs and the CCC Research Program discuss two vital necessities for a successful military trauma system: (1) the need for an Armed Services Blood Program and (2) Planning factors for current and future deployed military ere is no effective care for wounded soldiers, and by extension there is no effective military medicine.

A trauma expert consensus: Capabilities are required early to improve survivability from traumatic injury.

BACKGROUND: Mortality reviews examine US military fatalities resulting from traumatic injuries during combat operations. These reviews are essential to the evolution of the military trauma system to improve individual, unit, and system-level trauma care delivery and inform trauma system protocols and guidelines. This study identifies specific prehospital and hospital interventions with the potential to provide survival benefits. METHODS: US Special Operations Command fatalities with battle injuries deemed potentially survivable (2001-2021) were extracted from previous mortality reviews. A military trauma review panel consisting of trauma surgeons, forensic pathologists, and prehospital and emergency medicine specialists conducted a methodical review to identify prehospital, hospital, and resuscitation interventions (e.g., laparotomy, blood transfusion) with the potential to have provided a survival benefit. RESULTS: Of 388 US Special Operations Command battle-injured fatalities, 100 were deemed potentially survivable. Of these (median age, 29 years; all male), 76.0% were injured in Afghanistan, and 75% died prehospital. Gunshot wounds were in 62.0%, followed by blast injury (37%), and blunt force injury (1.0%). Most had a Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale severity classified as 4 (severe) (55.0%) and 5 (critical) (41.0%). The panel recommended 433 interventions (prehospital, 188; hospital, 315). The most recommended prehospital intervention was blood transfusion (95%), followed by finger/tube thoracostomy (47%). The most common hospital recommendations were thoracotomy and definitive vascular repair. Whole blood transfusion was assessed for each fatality: 74% would have required ≥10 U of blood, 20% would have required 5 to 10 U, 1% would have required 1 to 4 U, and 5% would not have required blood products to impact survival. Five may have benefited from a prehospital laparotomy. CONCLUSION: This study systematically identified capabilities needed to provide a survival benefit and examined interventions needed to inform trauma system efforts along the continuum of care. The determination was that blood transfusion and massive transfusion shortly after traumatic injury would impact survival the most. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level V.

Who needs a tourniquet? And who does not? Lessons learned from a review of tourniquet use in the Russo-Ukrainian war.

BACKGROUND: Extremity tourniquets have proven to be lifesaving in both civilian and military settings and should continue to be used by first responders for trauma patients with life-threatening extremity bleeding. This is especially true in combat scenarios in which both the casualty and the first responder may be confronted by the imminent threat of death from hostile fire as the extremity hemorrhage is being treated. Not every extremity wound, however, needs a tourniquet. One of the most important aspects of controlling life-threatening extremity bleeding with tourniquets is to recognize what magnitude of bleeding requires this intervention and what magnitude of bleeding does not. Multiple studies, both military and civilian, have shown that tourniquets are often applied when they are not medically indicated. Overuse of extremity tourniquets has not caused excess morbidity in either the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan or in the US urban civilian setting. In the presence of prolonged evacuation, however, applying a tourniquet when it is not medically indicated changes tourniquet application from being a lifesaving intervention to one that may cause an avoidable amputation and the development of an array of metabolic derangements and acute kidney injury collectively called prolonged tourniquet application syndrome. METHODS: The recent literature was reviewed for papers that documented the complications of tourniquet use resulting from the prolonged casualty evacuation times being seen in the current Russo-Ukrainian war. The literature was also reviewed for the incidence of tourniquet application that was found to not be medically indicated, in both the US civilian setting and from Ukraine. Finally, an in-person meeting of the US/Ukraine Tourniquet Working Group was held in Warsaw, Poland, in December of 2023. RESULTS: Unnecessary loss of extremities and life-threatening episodes of prolonged tourniquet application syndrome are currently occurring in Ukrainian combat forces because of nonindicated tourniquet use combined with the prolonged evacuation time seen in the Russo-Ukrainian war. Specific numbers of the complications experienced as a result of tourniquet use by Ukrainian forces in the current conflict are treated as classified information and are not available, but multiple sources from the Ukrainian military medical personnel and from the US advisors providing medical assistance to Ukraine have all agreed that the problem is substantial. CONCLUSION: Unnecessary tourniquet morbidity might also occur in US forces in a variety of potential future combat scenarios in which evacuation to surgical care is delayed. Prehospital trauma training programs, including but not limited to tactical combat casualty care, place insufficient emphasis on the need to avoid leaving tourniquets in place when they are not medically indicated. This aspect of training should receive emphasis in future Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) and civilian first responder curriculum development. An interim ad hoc training solution on this topic is available at the websites noted in this articles. Additional training modalities may follow in the near future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.

[Microbiological challenges in the treatment of war injuries]. / Mikrobiologische Herausforderungen bei der Versorgung von Kriegsverletzungen.

The treatment of war injuries represents a continuing and recurrent challenge in modern reconstructive surgery. Previously, tumor resections and sepsis-related resections were mainly responsible for lengthy bone defects in Germany. In recent years another picture has increasingly emerged, particularly caused by the medical support of Ukraine. Aspects of military surgery are also becoming more important in civil hospitals, especially in the treatment of gunshot and explosion injuries. In Germany, war injuries are currently secondarily treated, as the distribution of patients is carried out according to the cloverleaf principle, weeks or months after the occurrence of the primary injury. In addition to complex bone and soft tissue defects of the extremities following such injuries, which often affect neural and vascular structures, reconstruction is often complicated by an increasing spectrum of multidrug-resistant pathogens. The definition of microbiological terms, such as contamination, colonization, critical colonization, local and systemic infections are important in the clinical routine in order to initiate a targeted treatment, especially in treatment with antibiotics. Wound swabs for determination of the spectrum of pathogens and the optimal testing of resistance are important for selecting the appropriate antibiotic agents. The concept of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) is established in many hospitals to improve the quality of antibiotic treatment and to minimize the formation of resistance. The selection of the method of reconstruction depends on the condition of the patient, the overall clinical constellation and the function to be expected after completion of treatment. The treatment of injuries due to violence and terrorism necessitates clear concepts and an interdisciplinary approach, especially with respect to microbiological challenges and increasing resistance situations.

[Challenge of limb care after violence and war with a special focus on imaging procedures]. / Herausforderung der Extremitätenversorgung nach Gewalt und Krieg mit besonderer Betrachtung bildgebender Verfahren.

BACKGROUND: Injury patterns in the area of the extremities following violence and war harbor many special features and require special attention. Destructive and complex defect injuries are often present, which necessitate elaborate and special reconstruction approaches, predominantly as part of a staged and multistaged procedure. RESEARCH QUESTION: In this context, special attention must be paid to the diagnostic options as an essential aspect, as a clear diagnosis means that targeted treatment steps can be planned and implemented. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors' experience in this field from military operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, the Republic of Mali, Kosovo and Georgia, as well as the core content of the Terror and Disaster Surgical Care (TDSC®) course on this topic, have been contextualized and incorporated. In addition, aspects of interdisciplinary cooperation with radiological and, in particular, nuclear medicine disciplines are taken into account in the daily routine. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Extremity injuries in the context of violence and war are accompanied by complex bone and surrounding soft tissue defects due to the high energy impact. The principles of reconstruction familiar from everyday life can only be transferred one-to-one to a limited extent. The treatment pathways are often very long and complex and the questions of infection and tissue vitality must be answered again and again in stages. Interdisciplinary collaboration with the disciplines specialized in imaging procedures, particularly in the field of nuclear medicine, is one of the key building blocks for a successful treatment pathway.

[National challenges for trauma surgery in Germany due to violence and war]. / Nationale Herausforderungen für die Unfallchirurgie in Deutschland bei Gewalt und Krieg.

Due to the war in Ukraine and the treatment of patients with war wounds in the hospitals of the TraumaNetworks of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (TraumaNetzwerke DGU®), injuries from life-threatening mission situations (LebEL), terrorism, violence and war have become a matter of daily professional life. Furthermore, the societal and global feeling of security has fundamentally changed. The much-cited term "turning point in history", the reorientation of the Armed Forces and the investigation of the resilience of the healthcare system with respect to the "fitness for war", approximate to the description of the current challenges for trauma surgery (UCH) in Germany. Based on the developments following the terrorist attacks in Paris in 2015 and in Brussels in 2016, a clarification is given as to which adaptations have already been successful and how quickly an improvement could successfully be achieved. In this context, the concept of tactical care and the course on Terror and Disaster Surgical Care (TDSC), for example, have been game changing. The main challenge currently lies in overcoming the structural alterations in the German healthcare system and professionally in the treatment of war wounded personnel from Ukraine. The knowledge gained from these two national tasks must be analyzed for the future development and adaptation of established treatment structures, e.g., of the TraumaNetzwerke DGU®, under the requirements of the increased resilience against war, terrorism and violence. The aim is to name that which has already been achieved with respect to the national challenges for UCH and at the same time to outline or discuss further necessities for improvements and elimination of possible gaps in capabilities.

[Initial in-hospital treatment of patients with penetrating trauma due to violence and war]. / Innerklinische Erstversorgung von Patienten mit penetrierendem Trauma nach Gewalt und Krieg.

BACKGROUND: Current political and social developments have brought the topics of violence, in this context attributable to terrorism and sabotage, and since February 2022 awareness of war in particular has again greatly increased. This article aims to present the contextualized dealing with penetrating injuries in terms of initial in-hospital treatment. OBJECTIVE: The question remains to be answered as to what extent penetrating injuries require special attention and to what extent the treatment priorities, options and strategies as well as surgical treatment require adaptation of the usual approach in routine clinical practice in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The experience of the authors in this field from military operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, the Republic of Mali, Kosovo and Georgia as well as the core content of the Terror and Disaster Surgical Care (TDSC®) course on this topic, have been contextualized and incorporated. In addition, aspects of a comprehensive systematic literature review and current data from a national evaluation on the topic of preparing hospitals in Germany for such scenarios are taken into account. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The clinical systems need to be well-prepared for such casualties, especially if they require treatment in large numbers. This is precisely so because the majority of patients are in a relevantly threatening situation (usually in the sense of a hemorrhage), treatment must be very urgently provided and in such scenarios a lack of resources must always be overcome, at least temporarily, especially for example for blood transfusions.

Advancing Combat Casualty Care Statistics and Other Battlefield Care Metrics.

Aggregate statistics can provide intra-conflict and inter-conflict mortality comparisons and trends within and between U.S. combat operations. However, capturing individual-level data to evaluate medical and non-medical factors that influence combat casualty mortality has historically proven difficult. The Department of Defense (DoD) Trauma Registry, developed as an integral component of the Joint Trauma System during recent conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, has amassed individual-level data that have afforded greater opportunity for a variety of analyses and comparisons. Although aggregate statistics are easily calculated and commonly used across the DoD, other issues that require consideration include the impact of individual medical interventions, non-medical factors, non-battle-injured casualties, and incomplete or missing medical data, especially for prehospital care and forward surgical team care. Needed are novel methods to address these issues in order to provide a clearer interpretation of aggregate statistics and to highlight solutions that will ultimately increase survival and eliminate preventable death on the battlefield. Although many U.S. military combat fatalities sustain injuries deemed non-survivable, survival among these casualties might be improved using primary and secondary prevention strategies that prevent injury or reduce injury severity. The current commentary proposes adjustments to traditional aggregate combat casualty care statistics by integrating statistics from the DoD Military Trauma Mortality Review process as conducted by the Joint Trauma System and Armed Forces Medical Examiner System.

Refocusing the Military Health System to support Role 4 definitive care in future large-scale combat operations.

ABSTRACT: The last 20 years of sustained combat operations during the Global War on Terror generated significant advancements in combat casualty care. Improvements in point-of-injury care, en route care, and forward surgical care appropriately aligned with the survival, evacuation, and return to duty needs of the small-scale unconventional conflict. However, casualty numbers in large-scale combat operations have brought into focus the critical need for modernized casualty receiving and convalescence: Role 4 definitive care. Historically, World War II was the most recent conflict in which the United States fought in multiple operational theaters, with hundreds of thousands of combat casualties returned to the continental United States. These numbers necessitated the establishment of a "Zone of the Interior," which integrated military and civilian health care networks for definitive treatment and rehabilitation of casualties. Current security threats demand refocusing and bolstering the Military Health System's definitive care capabilities to maximize its force regeneration capacity in a similar fashion. Medical force generation, medical force sustainment and readiness, and integrated casualty care capabilities are three pillars that must be developed for Military Health System readiness of Role 4 definitive care in future large-scale contingencies against near-peer/peer adversaries.

[Current mortality from war injuries-A narrative review]. / Aktuelle Mortalität von Kriegsverletzungen ­ eine narrative Übersichtsarbeit.

BACKGROUND: The war in Ukraine has led to a strategic reorientation of the German Armed Forces towards national and alliance defense. This has also raised the need for medical and surgical adaptation to scenarios of conventional warfare. In order to develop appropriate and effective concepts it is necessary to identify those war injuries that are associated with a relevant primary and secondary mortality and that can be influenced by medical measures (potentially survivable injuries). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this selective literature review was to identify war injuries with high primary and secondary mortality. METHODS: A selective literature review was performed in the PubMed® database with the search terms war OR combat AND injury AND mortality from 2001 to 2023. Studies including data of war injuries and associated mortality were included. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies were included in the analysis. Severe traumatic brain injury and thoracoabdominal hemorrhage were the main contributors to primary mortality. Injuries to the trunk, neck, traumatic brain injury, and burns were associated with relevant secondary mortality. Among potentially survivable injuries, thoracoabdominal hemorrhage accounted for the largest proportion. Prehospital blood transfusions and short transport times significantly reduced war-associated mortality. CONCLUSION: Control of thoracoabdominal hemorrhage has the highest potential to reduce mortality in modern warfare. Besides that, treatment of traumatic brain injury, burns and neck injuries has a high relevance in reducing mortality. Hospitals of the German Armed Forces need to focus on these requirements.

Long-term burden of war injuries among civilians in LMICs: case of the July 2006 war in Lebanon.

Introduction: Lebanon, a country located on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea, is one of the world's smaller sovereign states. In the past few decades, Lebanon endured a perpetual political turmoil and several armed conflicts. July 12, 2006, marked the start of a one-month war in Lebanon, which resulted in thousands of casualties. Little is known about the long-term consequences of war injuries inflicted on civilians during the July 2006 war. Methods: The objectives of this paper were to identify and evaluate: 1- civilians' access to healthcare and medicine under conditions of war; 2- the long-term socioeconomic burden on injured civilians; and 3- their quality of life more than a decade post-war. We adopted a mixed-method research design with an emphasis on the qualitative component. We conducted interviews with patients, collected clinical and financial data from hospital medical records, and administered a self-rated health questionnaire, the EQ-5D-5L. Simple descriptive statistics were calculated using Excel. NVivo 12® was used for data management and thematic analysis. Results: We conducted 25 interviews. Injured civilians were mostly males, average age of 27. The most common mechanism of injury was blast injury. Most patients underwent multiple surgeries as well as revision surgeries. The thematic analysis revealed three themes: 1- recall of the time of the incident, the thousand miles journey, and patients' access to services; 2- post-trauma sequelae and services; and 3- long-term impact. Patients described the long-term burden including chronic pain, poor mobility, anxiety or depression, and limited activities of daily living. Discussion: Civilians injured during the July 2006 war described the traumatising events they endured during the war and the limited access to medical care during and post-war. Up until this study was conducted, affected civilians were still experiencing physical, psychological, and financial sequelae. Acknowledging the limitations of this study, which include a small sample size and recall bias, the findings underscore the necessity for the expansion of services catering to civilians injured during wartime.

Targeted metagenomic assessment reflects critical colonization in battlefield injuries.

IMPORTANCE: Microbial contamination in combat wounds can lead to opportunistic infections and adverse outcomes. However, current microbiological detection has a limited ability to capture microbial functional genes. This work describes the application of targeted metagenomic sequencing to profile wound bioburden and capture relevant wound-associated signatures for clinical utility. Ultimately, the ability to detect such signatures will help guide clinical decisions regarding wound care and management and aid in the prediction of wound outcomes.

The relationship between combat-related traumatic amputation and subclinical cardiovascular risk.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between acute combat-related traumatic injury (CRTI) to coronary flow reserve (CFR) and subclinical cardiovascular risk have not been examined and was the primary aim of this study. METHODS AND RESULTS: UK combat veterans from the ADVANCE cohort study (UK-Afghanistan War 2003-14) with traumatic limb amputations were compared to injured non-amputees and to a group of uninjured veterans from the same conflict. Subclinical cardiovascular risk measures included fasted blood atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), triglyceride-glucose index (TyG; insulin resistance), the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP; vascular inflammation), body mass index (BMI) and visceral fat volume (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD; physical performance). The subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), to estimate CFR, was calculated using arterial pulse waveform analysis (Vicorder device). In total 1144 adult male combat veterans were investigated, comprising 579 injured (161 amputees, 418 non-amputees) and 565 uninjured men. AIP, TyG, NLR, hs-CRP, BMI, total body fat and visceral fat volume were significantly higher and the SEVR and 6MWD significantly lower in the amputees versus the injured-non-amputees and uninjured groups. The SEVR was lowest in those with above knee and multiple limb amputations. CRTI (ExpB 0.96; 95% CI 0.94-0.98: p < 0.0001) and amputation (ExpB 0.94: 95% CI 0.91-0.97: p < 0.0001) were independently associated with lower SEVR after adjusting for age, rank, ethnicity and time from injury. CONCLUSION: CRTI, traumatic amputation and its worsening physical deficit are associated with lower coronary flow reserve and heightened subclinical cardiovascular risk.

No association between war-related trauma or PTSD symptom severity and epigenome-wide DNA methylation in Burundian refugees.

Background: War-related trauma is associated with varying posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) prevalence rates in refugees. In PTSD development, differential DNA methylation (DNAm) levels associated with trauma exposure might be involved in risk versus resilience processes. Studies investigating DNAm profiles related to trauma exposure and PTSD among refugees remain sparse.Objective: The present epigenome-wide association study investigated associations between war-related trauma, PTSD, and altered DNAm patterns in Burundian refugee families with 110 children and their 207 female and male caregivers.Method: War-related trauma load and PTSD symptom severity were assessed in structured clinical interviews with standardised instruments. Epigenome-wide DNAm levels were quantified from buccal epithelia using the Illumina EPIC beadchip.Results: Controlling for biological confounders, no significant epigenome-wide DNAm alterations associated with trauma exposure or PTSD were identified in children or caregivers (FDRs > .05). Co-methylated positions derived as modules from weighted gene correlation network analyses were not significantly associated with either war-related trauma experience in children or caregivers or with PTSD.Conclusions: These results do not provide evidence for altered DNAm patterns associated with exposure to war-related trauma or PTSD.

The study examines an understudied population in epigenome-wide association studies.Burundian refugees' war-trauma, PTSD, and DNA methylation were studied.Epigenome-wide DNA methylation was not significantly associated with war-trauma or PTSD in the conflict-affected sample.