Addressing corneal opacity after herpes zoster infection.

A 15-year-old boy was referred for corneal opacity evaluation. The patient had a previous herpes zoster virus (HZV) infection-varicella-zoster virus (VZV)-with ocular manifestation 1 year ago. After the infection, he developed a central corneal scar and decreased corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in the right eye. The slitlamp examination showed the right eye with central corneal opacity (involving anterior stroma), lacuna area between the haze, fluorescein negative, and no vascularization near the scar (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202406000-00019/figure1/v/2024-07-10T174224Z/r/image-tiff). The patient had been treated with oral valacyclovir and topical corticosteroids without any improvement of visual acuity or changes in opacity within the 1-year follow-up. His CDVA was 20/200 (-4.50 -0.75 × 25) in the right eye and counting fingers (-4.00) in the left eye. Intraocular pressure was 12 mm Hg in both eyes. Fundoscopy was normal in the right eye, but he had a macular scar in the left eye (diagnosed when he was 7 years). The left eye had no cornea signs. The patient has no comorbidity or previous surgeries. Considering this case, a corneal central scar in a 15-year-old boy, legally single eye only, and assuming it is an opacity in the anterior stroma, would you consider surgery for this patient? If so, which would you choose: Would you consider an excimer laser treatment of his ametropia while partially removing his opacity, a phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK), or a PTK followed by a topography-guided treatment, femtosecond laser-assisted anterior lamellar keratoplasty (FALK), or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) or penetrating keratoplasty (depending on the scar depth)? Would you consider prophylactic acyclovir during and after surgery? Would you consider any other surgical step to prevent delayed corneal healing-persistent epithelial defect? Before the surgical approach, would you consider treating this patient with topical losartan (a transforming growth factor [TGF]-ß signaling inhibitor)? Would you first perform the surgery (which one) and then start the medication? Furthermore, if so, how long would you treat this patient? Would you consider treatment with another medication?

Cranial Nerve VI Palsy Secondary to Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus: A Case Report and Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: In this report, we describe a rare case of a cranial nerve VI palsy secondary to herpes zoster infection with polyneuropathic involvement. CASE PRESENTATION: An 82-year-old male was seen by ophthalmology for acute onset of double vision. Fourteen days before presenting, he was diagnosed with herpes zoster ophthalmicus. He was suspected to have zoster polyneuropathy also involving cranial nerve IX and X given a sore throat that began prior to the characteristic trigeminal dermatomal rash. He was diagnosed with cranial nerve VI palsy secondary to herpes zoster infection. DISCUSSION: Ophthalmic complications of herpes zoster ophthalmicus are many; however, extraocular nerve palsies secondary to herpes zoster infection and zoster polyneuropathy are documented infrequently in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Extraocular muscle palsies are a rare complication of herpes zoster infection. This case reviews the most current literature surrounding this condition and discusses the significance of polyneuropathic involvement in varicella zoster virus reactivation.

Characteristics of Prescreened Patients Who Did Not Participate in the Zoster Eye Disease Study.

PURPOSE: The Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS) is a multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) funded by the National Eye Institute aiming to determine the efficacy of suppressive valacyclovir treatment in herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) that enrolled fewer participants than planned (527/780, 67.6%). Understanding reasons for nonparticipation of likely eligible prescreened patients provides insights into patient populations that are not represented by ZEDS and barriers in clinical trials. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, HZO adults likely eligible for ZEDS with a history of a typical rash and a medical record within the past year of an episode of epithelial or stromal keratitis or iritis were prescreened at activated Participating Clinical Centers from 2017 to 2022 using a standard prescreening log. De-identified data including demographic information, reasons for exclusion because of ineligibility, and patient refusal were retrospectively entered into REDCap and analyzed. RESULTS: Prescreening logs with reasons for nonconsent (1244/1706, 72.9%) were included in the data set. Patients were excluded from the study (915/1244, 73.6%) because they did not meet all inclusion criteria (619/915, 67.7%) or met an exclusion criterion (296/915, 32.3%). Among the 12 exclusion criteria for the ZEDS study, immunocompromise (76/296, 25.7%) and renal insufficiency (50/296, 16.9%) were most frequently reported. Patient refusal to participate (327/1,244, 26.3%) was common. CONCLUSION: The most common reasons for ineligibility were immunocompromise and renal insufficiency. There may be benefits to long-term antiviral use in these populations not captured in ZEDS. A quarter (26.3%) of prescreened patients refused participation, showing the substantial impact of patient preferences on trial participation.

Multiple ocular manifestations in a patient diagnosed with herpes zoster ophthalmicus: case report.

Objective: Our purpose was to present a case of a patient diagnosed with herpes zoster ophthalmicus with multiple ocular manifestations. Case presentation: A 70-year-old Caucasian male presented to the hospital for headache and skin hyperesthesia on the scalp and forehead on the left side. The diagnoses of herpes zoster ophthalmicus and acute conjunctivitis were made for the left eye. The patient was followed up for 6 months and during that period the following diagnoses were made for the same eye: peripheral sterile corneal infiltrates, episcleritis, and hypertensive anterior uveitis. Discussions: Herpes zoster ophthalmicus occurs when the reactivation of the dormant virus involves the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve. The most frequent ocular presentations are conjunctivitis, keratitis, uveitis, episcleritis, and scleritis. The standard therapy consists of antivirals, such as acyclovir, valacyclovir, and famciclovir to limit the replication of the virus. The patient's risk factors, the course of treatment, and the severity of the disease, all affect the prognosis, which is highly variable. Prevention of the disease consists of vaccination with one of the following two vaccines, Zostavax and Shingrix. Conclusions: Final visual acuity for the left eye remained 1 despite numerous manifestations of the disease. Abbreviations: VZV = Varicella-zoster virus, BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity, OU = both eyes, OD = right eye, OS = left eye, IOP = intraocular pressure, NCT = non-contact tonometer, ZVX = Zostavax vaccine.

Risk of Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus Recurrence After Recombinant Zoster Vaccination.

Importance: The recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is currently recommended for immunocompetent adults aged 50 years or older and immunocompromised adults aged 19 years or older and is effective in preventing herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). However, questions about the safety of RZV in patients with a history of HZO remain. Objective: To evaluate whether there is an increased risk of HZO recurrence after RZV in patients with a history of HZO. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used medical and outpatient pharmacy claims data for commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse. Patients with incident HZO from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021, were identified; the study period ended on March 31, 2022. The vaccinated group consisted of patients with at least 1 dose of RZV more than 90 days following the initial HZO diagnosis. The unvaccinated group consisted of patients without any record of RZV in the study period. Vaccinated and unvaccinated patients were matched using exact k:1 matching without replacement. Exposure: Recombinant zoster vaccination. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the number of HZO recurrences with and without RZV exposure. Results: A total of 16 408 patients were included in the matched analysis, of whom 12 762 were unvaccinated (7806 [61.2%] female; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 68.8 [10.3] years) and 3646 were vaccinated (2268 [62.2%] female; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 67.4 [9.8] years). Within the primary risk period of 56 days after the index date (ie, the start of follow-up for the outcome), the incidence of HZO recurrence after any RZV exposure was 37.7 per 1000 person-years compared with 26.2 per 1000 person-years in the unexposed group. After controlling for race and ethnicity, inpatient stays, emergency department visits, concomitant vaccines, and eye care practitioner visits, the association between vaccination status and HZO exacerbation in the primary risk period had an adjusted hazard ratio for any RZV exposure of 1.64 (95% CI, 1.01-2.67; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, RZV exposure was associated with a higher likelihood of HZO recurrence in patients with a history of HZO compared with no RZV exposure. These findings support consideration that patients with a history of HZO may benefit from monitoring after receiving RZV in case of HZO recurrence.

Viral Keratitis, Surgical Intervention in Viral Keratitis, Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment of Viral Keratitis, HSV, HZV.

Viral keratitis is a significant cause of ocular morbidity and visual impairment worldwide. In recent years, there has been a growing understanding of the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic modalities for viral keratitis. The most common viral pathogens associated with this condition are adenovirus, herpes simplex (HSV), and varicella-zoster virus (VZV). However, emerging viruses such as cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and Vaccinia virus can also cause keratitis. Non-surgical interventions are the mainstay of treatment for viral keratitis. Antiviral agents such as Acyclovir, Ganciclovir, and trifluridine have effectively reduced viral replication and improved clinical outcomes. Additionally, adjunctive measures such as lubrication, corticosteroids, and immunomodulatory agents have alleviated symptoms by reducing inflammation and facilitating tissue repair. Despite these conservative approaches, some cases of viral keratitis may progress to severe forms, leading to corneal scarring, thinning, or perforation. In such instances, surgical intervention becomes necessary to restore corneal integrity and visual function. This review article aims to provide an overview of the current perspectives and surgical interventions in managing viral keratitis. The choice of surgical technique depends on the extent and severity of corneal involvement. As highlighted in this article, on-going research and advancements in surgical interventions hold promise for further improving outcomes in patients with viral keratitis.

Unilateral Acute Retinal Necrosis with Contralateral Non-necrotizing Herpetic Uveitis.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to report a case of unilateral acute retinal necrosis (ARN) with contralateral eye presenting as non-necrotizing herpetic uveitis. CASE REPORTS: Case 1: A 48-year-old female presented at our clinic with blurred vision in the right eye for 7 days. She was diagnosed with ARN in the left eye 2 weeks ago. Ophthalmic examination revealed reduced visual acuity in the right eye (20/33) with the presence of optic disc swelling and macular exudation without peripheral necrotic lesions. With systemic antiviral therapy, optic disc swelling of the right eye vanished gradually, and the visual acuity improved to 20/20. Loss of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and decreased retinal thickness in the corresponding area occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Non-necrotizing herpetic uveitis may occur in the contralateral eye of unilateral ARN under rare conditions. Structure abnormities, including loss of RNFL and focal decreased retinal thickness, are irretrievable.

Herpes zoster ophthalmicus.

Herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) occurs when latent varicella zoster virus reactivates in the ophthalmic division of the fifth cranial nerve (CNV1). HZO commonly affects older and immunocompromised patients. This disease is considered an ophthalmic emergency due to the wide range of associated ocular symptoms, including severe chronic pain and vision loss. HZO is typically a clinical diagnosis due to its classic presentation of a unilateral vesicular eruption in the dermatomes corresponding to CNV1. Timely treatment is imperative to minimize ocular morbidity in HZO, given that ocular involvement is present in 50% of affected patients.

The Infectious Uveitis Treatment Algorithm Network (TITAN) Report 1-global current practice patterns for the management of Herpes Simplex Virus and Varicella Zoster Virus anterior uveitis.

AIMS: To present current expert practice patterns and to formulate a consensus for the management of HSV and VZV AU by uveitis specialists worldwide. METHODS: A two-round online modified Delphi survey with masking of the study team was conducted. Responses were collected from 76 international uveitis experts from 21 countries. Current practices in the diagnosis and treatment of HSV and VZV AU were identified. A working group (The Infectious Uveitis Treatment Algorithm Network [TITAN]) developed data into consensus guidelines. Consensus is defined as a particular response towards a specific question meeting ≥75% of agreement or IQR ≤ 1 when a Likert scale is used. RESULTS: Unilaterality, increased intraocular pressure (IOP), decreased corneal sensation and diffuse or sectoral iris atrophy are quite specific for HSV or VZV AU from consensus opinion. Sectoral iris atrophy is characteristic of HSV AU. Treatment initiation is highly variable, but most experts preferred valacyclovir owing to simpler dosing. Topical corticosteroids and beta-blockers should be used if necessary. Resolution of inflammation and normalisation of IOP are clinical endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was reached on several aspects of diagnosis, choice of initial treatment, and treatment endpoints for HSV and VZV AU. Treatment duration and management of recurrences varied between experts.

Bilateral herpes zoster ophthalmicus in an immunocompetent patient.

INTRODUCTION: Bilateral herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) is rare. We report a case of an immunocompetent patient with nonsimultaneous attacks of HZO in both eyes. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 71-year-old female patient complained of blurred vision in the left eye for 1 week, which was treated with topical antiglaucomatous drugs due to elevated intraocular pressure. She denied any systemic diseases, but HZO had manifested as a rash with a crust over the right forehead skin 3 months earlier. Slit-lamp examination revealed localized corneal edema with keratin precipitates and mild anterior chamber reaction. Suspecting corneal endotheliitis, we performed aqueous tapping for detecting viral DNA, including cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, and varicella zoster virus (VZV) DNA, through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, but the PCR results were negative for all viruses. The endotheliitis resolved well after treatment with topical prednisolone acetate. However, the patient's blurred vision recurred in the left eye 2 months later. A dendritiform lesion on the left cornea was detected, and corneal scraping for PCR testing revealed VZV DNA. The lesion disappeared with antiviral treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral HZO is uncommon, particularly in immunocompetent patients. When in doubt, physicians should perform tests such as PCR testing to help establish a definite diagnosis.

Practice Patterns in the Initial Management of Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus in the United States.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to examine the trends in the initial management of herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) in the United States from 2010 to 2018 and compare them with the treatment preferences of corneal specialists. METHODS: A retrospective, observational deidentified cohort study was conducted on individuals enrolled in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse who had a new diagnosis of HZO from 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2018. An online survey ascertaining HZO management perspectives was distributed to The Cornea Society listserv. The main outcome assessed was proportion of cases with systemic antiviral prescriptions, eye care provider involvement, and follow-up visits after the initial HZO diagnosis. RESULTS: Approximately 50% of patients received systemic antivirals the day of initial HZO diagnosis or within 7 days (45.6% and 53.7%, respectively). Most initial diagnoses were made by ophthalmologists (45.0%), followed by optometrists (19.2%). Referral rate to ophthalmology within a year of initial diagnosis was 38.6%. 48.7% cases had at least 1 follow-up visit with any type of provider within 30 days. Our survey of corneal specialists found 97% would prescribe systemic antivirals to those with ocular involvement, but 66% would prescribe antivirals to those without ocular or eyelid involvement. Seventy percent supported all patients having follow-up with an eye care provider within a month. CONCLUSIONS: HZO antiviral therapies seem to be underprescribed in the United States, referral rates to ophthalmology are low, and follow-up is suboptimal, which are not aligned with recommendations from corneal specialists. More research is needed to establish standardized guidelines for treatment, referral, and follow-up with ophthalmology for HZO.

Aseptic meningitis after amenamevir treatment for herpes zoster ophthalmicus with oculomotor nerve palsy in a patient taking immunosuppressant.

A 79-year-old woman presented with vomiting after being prescribed amenamevir by her primary care physician. She had a medical history of rheumatoid arthritis and was administered prednisolone and methotrexate. She was finally diagnosed with herpes zoster ophthalmicus and aseptic meningitis, and intravenous antiviral therapy was initiated. However, the patient developed oculomotor nerve palsy on the 11th day of hospitalization. In this case, there was a time lag between the administration of antiviral drugs and clinical improvement. Our case suggests the necessity of selecting antivirals, especially in high-risk cases of CNS complications, to avoid the low intracerebral transferability of antiviral drugs, including amenamevir.