Health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer initiating GnRH agonist therapy: the PRISME study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the evolution of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over 6 months of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) therapy among age groups for patients with prostate cancer (PCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS: PRISME (NCT03516110) was a non-interventional, prospective study conducted in France in patients aged ≥60 years with PCa initiating GnRHa therapy within routine care. HRQoL was evaluated at baseline and after 6 months using the EORTC quality of life in ELDerly cancer patients 14 items (QLQ-ELD14) questionnaire. Cognitive status was assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Analyses of covariance compared the evolution of the change from baseline of the QLQ-ELD14 scores among age groups. RESULTS: 814 patients were enrolled (245, 60-70 years; 314, 70-75 years; 252, ≥75 years). Slight or no changes were observed in each QLQ-ELD14 dimension between baseline and 6 months, overall and by age. In the primary effectiveness analysis, there was no difference among age groups in the change from baseline in QLQ-ELD14 scores. Baseline cognitive status was lower in the oldest age group, but there were no changes in all age groups. As expected, sexual function declined in all age groups. CONCLUSION: GnRHa therapy influence on HRQoL, cognition and sexuality appeared independent of age.

Prostate cancer that has spread to other parts of the body is called "advanced prostate cancer." Hormone therapy is a common treatment for high risk localized and advanced prostate cancer. It works by lowering hormone levels, causing prostate cancers to grow more slowly or shrink. But, side effects from this kind of treatment can affect a patient's quality of life. Common side effects of hormone therapy include a loss of sex drive, erectile dysfunction, bone weakening, hot flushes, or mood disorders. Most patients with prostate cancer are over the age of 60 years, but elderly patients are often excluded from clinical trials, meaning that we lack data about them. This study assessed if there was a link between age and health-related quality of life in men with advanced prostate cancer treated with hormone therapy. The study included 814 men with advanced prostate cancer who were over 60 years old and had started a type of hormone therapy called gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) therapy. The results showed that health-related quality of life was similar after 6 months of hormone therapy, in the overall group of patients and in the different age groups (60­70, 70­75, and over 75 years of age). Cognitive impairment occurred about twice as often in patients aged over 75 years than among younger patients, before initiation of hormone therapy. Cognitive impairment was likely caused by ageing and was not associated with hormone therapy treatment. Sexual function decreased in all age groups, particularly in patients aged 60­70 years. This study did not reveal any major impact of hormone therapy on health-related quality of life in older men with advanced prostate cancer, after a 6-month period and the use of routine questionnaires.

GnRH agonist pretreatment for frozen embryo transfer among women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a narrow systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Frozen embryo transfer (FET) is usually recommended for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing In vitro fertilization (IVF). While there is no consensus as to the optimal protocol of endometrial preparation for FET. The effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) pretreatment for FET among women with PCOS remains controversial. PURPOSE: We intend to explore whether GnRH-a pretreatment could improve clinical outcomes for women with PCOS undergoing FET. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to May 16, 2024. Eligible studies involved patients with PCOS undergoing FET and receiving GnRH-a pretreatment for endometrial preparation, with artificial cycle (AC) as the control therapy. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in Chinese and English were included. Data extraction was performed independently by two authors. Effect was quantified using odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effect models with the Mantel-Hansel (M-H) method in Revman software. Quality of outcomes was evaluated using the GRADEpro system. Primary outcomes contained the clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of preterm labor and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). RESULTS: Ninety-seven records were initially retrieved, with 21 duplicates and 65 articles excluded after title and abstract screening. Seven studies were excluded due to retrospective design, leaving three RCTs with 709 participants. Among them, 353 received GnRH-a pretreatment as the intervention group and 356 received AC as the control group. No significant differences were observed in the clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.56, P = 0.66), miscarriage rate (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.90, P = 0.52), live birth rate (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.25, P = 0.46), and the risk of preterm labor (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.65, P = 0.23) and GDM (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.48, P = 0.39) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, GnRH-a pretreatment does not confer any advantages and appears unnecessary for women with PCOS undergoing FET. Additional RCTs should focus on maternal complications and the health of offspring.

GnRH-a-based fertility-sparing treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized designed clinical trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Around 4% of women receive an endometrial cancer diagnosis before turning 40, mainly those without prior childbirth experience and a strong desire to preserve their ability to conceive. Consequently, for young patients diagnosed with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or early endometrial carcinoma (EC), a fertility-preserving approach employing high-dose oral progesterone has been adopted. However, previous research has shown a notable relapse rate. Furthermore, the extended use of substantial oral progesterone doses may hinder ovarian function and raise the risk of weight gain, liver issues, blood clotting, and breast cancer. We previously assessed the clinical effectiveness and pregnancy outcomes of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) based re-treatment for women with EC and AEH who did not respond to oral progestin therapy but achieved favorable treatment results and reproductive outcomes. METHODS: This study will be an open-label, two-armed, randomized, investigator-initiated multicenter trial evaluating the combination of GnRH-a with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or the combination of GnRH-a with an aromatase inhibitor (comprising a subcutaneous GnRH-a injection every 4 weeks and daily oral letrozole 2.5 mg). A total of 226 participants will be randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio. The primary objective is to determine the effectiveness of GnRH-a-based re-treatment in achieving a complete response (CR) at 24 weeks for patients with AEH or EC. Secondary objectives include assessing the pregnancy rate 12 weeks after treatment, as well as post-treatment pregnancy outcomes and the rate of recurrence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital and from boards at five other institutions. The trial will adhere to the principles outlined in the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki and follow Good Clinical Practice standards. The trial results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective evidence supporting conservative treatment for EC and AEH is limited. There is a need for new approaches that can achieve higher CR rates with fewer side effects. This trial will assess the effectiveness of GnRH-a-based fertility-sparing treatment in obese women and recurrent patients, offering a promising alternative for patients with EC and AEH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200067099. Registered on December 27, 2022.

GnRH agonist-only trigger, compared to dual trigger, reduces oocyte retrieval rate in high responders without affecting cumulative live birth rate.

Introduction: This study compared, in high responders undergoing IVF treatment, GnRH agonist-only trigger and dual trigger on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative live birth rate (LBR). The aim was to determine if the GnRH agonist-only triggers had provided outcomes comparable to dual trigger, while minimizing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Materials and methods: A retrospective, matched case-control study was conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, including women who underwent IVF/ICSI between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. Inclusion criteria were: GnRH antagonist protocol and estrogen level >3,000 pg/ml on trigger day. Exclusion criteria were: immune/metabolic diseases, donated oocytes, and mixed stimulation cycles. Propensity score matching was applied to balance age, AMH level, and oocyte number between the GnRH agonist-only and dual trigger groups. Outcomes were analyzed for patients who had complete treatment cycles, focusing on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative LBR. Results: We analyzed 116 cycles in the agonist-only group, and 232 cycles in the dual trigger group. No inter-group difference was found in their age, BMI, and AMH levels. The dual trigger group had a higher oocyte retrieval rate (93% vs. 80%; p <0.05), while fertilization rates, blastocyst formation rates, and cumulative LBR were comparable. Notably, no OHSS cases had been reported in the GnRH agonist-only group, compared with 7 cases in the dual trigger group. Conclusion: GnRH agonist-only triggers resulted in a lower oocyte retrieval rate compared to dual triggers but did not significantly affect cumulative LBR in high responders. This approach effectively reduces OHSS risk without compromising pregnancy outcomes, making it a preferable option in freeze-all strategies, despite a longer oocyte pick-up duration and a medium cost. GnRH agonist-only trigger, however, may not be suitable for fresh embryo transfers or patients with low serum LH levels on trigger day.

Use of puberty-blocking hormones for gender dysphoria in New Zealand: descriptive analysis and international comparisons.

AIM: To investigate use of puberty-blocking hormones (gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues [GnRHa]) for gender dysphoria in New Zealand. Specifically, to describe demographic characteristics and time trends in the prevalence and incidence of prescribing, and to calculate cumulative incidence (proportion) of first prescribing of GnRHa for gender dysphoria in order to make valid international comparisons. METHOD: The national Pharmaceutical Collection was used to identify all dispensing from 2006 to 2023 to those aged <18, by sex/gender and age. Cumulative incidence of first prescriptions between ages 12 and 17 (which largely excludes prescribing for other indications) was calculated and compared with the Netherlands and England and Wales. RESULTS: In New Zealand, prescription of GnRHa for gender dysphoria started around 2011; prevalence of use increased to 2014, then more steeply to 2022, followed by a decline. Incidence data show the decline started from 2021. New Zealand, compared to the Netherlands (which started prescribing in the 1990s), had 1.7 times the cumulative incidence of first prescriptions by 2018. Compared to England and Wales up to 2020, New Zealand had 3.5-6.9 times the cumulative incidence. CONCLUSION: The high rate of prescribing for probable gender dysphoria in New Zealand, and the decline after 2021, require further investigation.

Effects of pretreatment with long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists on pregnancy outcomes in patients with minimal and mild peritoneal endometriosis: A retrospective study of 274 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

To investigate the effects of pretreatment with long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) before frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) on pregnancy outcomes in patients after minimal-mild (stages I-II) peritoneal endometriosis surgery. A retrospective cohort study was performed from March 2018 to May 2019. Overall, 274 patients met inclusion criteria of undergoing FET after minimal/mild peritoneal endometriosis surgery. For the FET protocol, patients were divided into 2 groups: GnRH-a plus hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (group A, n = 154) and HRT-only (group B, n = 120), with the former divided into 2 subgroups receiving 1 (group A1, n = 80) or 2 doses (group A2, n = 74) of GnRH-a. Basic characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of groups A and B and groups A1 and A2 were compared. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were the primary outcomes and logistic regression was used to analyze independent correlation factors. The CPR and LBR in group A were 58.4% and 50.0%, respectively, and were not significantly higher than in group B (49.2% and 40.0%; respectively, χ2 = 2.339, P = .126 and χ2 = 2.719, P = .099, respectively). CPR and LBR in group A1 were not significantly lower than those in group A2 (52.5% and 45.0% vs 64.9% and 55.4%, respectively; χ2 = 2.420, P = .120 and χ2 = 1.665, P = .197, respectively). However, group A2's CPR and LBR were significantly higher than group B's (64.9% and 55.4% vs 49.2% and 40.0%, respectively; χ2 = 4.560, P = .023 and χ2 = 4.375, P = .026, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that GnRH-a pretreatment (1 or 2 doses) had no significant effect on CPR and LBR compared with the HRT-only group. Patients with minimal-mild (stages I-II) peritoneal endometriosis surgery may not require GnRH-a pretreatment before FET.

Do body esteem and quality of life scores change with puberty signs or precocious puberty treatment?

OBJECTIVES: Body esteem (BE) and quality of life (QOL) of girls aged 9-11 years may change depending on their puberty. We aimed to examine The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL 4.0) and the Body Esteem for Adolescents and Adults Scale (BESAA) for children. METHODS: The groups were determined as those whose puberty signs had not yet started (Group 1), those having with breast development stage 3 and/or larger (Group 2), and those who had received gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) treatment for at least 6 months (Group 3). RESULTS: A total of 145 girls (Group 1: 41, Group 2: 56, Group 3: 48), were included. The PedsQL scores of the Group 1 was higher than Group 2 (78.5 ± 10.3 vs. 70.1 ± 14.2; p=0.008). The PedsQL scores of the Group 1 was higher but not statistically different from Group 3 (78.5 ± 10.3 vs. 74.2 ± 14.3; p=0.401). The PedsQL scores of Group 2 was not statistically different from Group 3 (p=0.354). There was no statistical difference in BESAA scores between groups (p=0.291). Group 1's PedsQL Health and Activity subscale score was higher than Group 2 (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: The QOL of the girls with PP was found to be lower than their healthy peers. Health and Activity-related QOL scores were found to be lower in the untreated group, indicating that girls with PP were probably significantly disturbed by their puberty-related physical development at the onset of the disease.

Medical management of endometriosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While laparoscopic surgery plays a key role in the management of endometriosis, symptoms commonly recur, and repeat surgery comes with increased risk. Medical management, including hormonal and nonhormonal treatment, is vital in managing painful symptoms. This review summarizes recent evidence regarding various medical management options available to treat pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Efficacy of dienogest vs. combined oral contraceptive on pain associated with endometriosis: randomized clinical trial.Once daily oral relugolix combination therapy vs. placebo in patients with endometriosis-associated pain: two replicate phase 3, randomised, double-blind, studies (SPIRIT 1 and 2).A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of the comparative effects of dienogest and the combined oral contraceptive pill in women with endometriosis.Two-year efficacy and safety of relugolix combination therapy in women with endometriosis-associated pain: SPIRIT open-label extension study. SUMMARY: All symptomatic women with suspected endometriosis who are not desiring immediate fertility can be offered suppressive treatment to control symptoms and slow the progression of disease. First-line treatments include the combined oral contraceptive pill and progestogens. Second-line treatments include gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists but current guidelines recommend that these should be reserved for people whose symptoms fail to be controlled by first-line agents. The use of complementary and alternative medicines is also increasing in both volume and number of agents used.

An Overview of Long-Acting GnRH Agonists in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: Survivorship Challenges and Management.

Managing breast cancer in premenopausal women poses unique challenges due to its considerable effect on both morbidity and mortality. Goserelin, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, has emerged among the various modalities as a preferred option for ovarian function suppression, owing to its efficacy in reducing ovarian estrogen production in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Recent studies have affirmed the efficacy and safety of long-acting (LA) goserelin 10.8 mg every 12 weeks, offering comparable outcomes to monthly injections. This flexibility enables personalized treatment approaches, potentially enhancing patient satisfaction. Off-label utilization of goserelin LA surged during the coronavirus disease pandemic, prompting initiatives to broaden its use for breast cancer treatment. Switching to goserelin LA can streamline treatment, boost adherence, and optimize resource utilization. With the recent approval of goserelin 10.8 mg LA by Health Canada on 6 May 2024, for use in breast cancer, Canada is the latest to join over 60 countries worldwide to expand the accepted indications for goserelin LA and ensure its availability to potentially enhance healthcare delivery, patient care, and breast cancer outcomes. Goserelin LA offers premenopausal patients a means to more effectively manage the constraints imposed by breast cancer treatment and its impact on survivorship.

Clinical pharmacology in adolescent transgender medicine.

Adolescent transgender medicine is a growing clinical field. Gender-affirming medications for transgender youth may include gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, gender-affirming hormones or both. To evaluate the potential effects of GnRH agonists (puberty suppression) on pharmacokinetic processes for transgender youth, we searched PubMed from inception to May 2024 for publications on the effects of GnRH agonists on drug absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion for transgender adolescents or effects on hormones (including gonadotropins, adrenal androgens, sex steroids) that are associated with changes in drug metabolism during puberty in the general adolescent population. No publications discussed the effects of GnRH agonist treatment on pharmacokinetic processes for adolescent transgender people. Sixteen publications observed marked decreases in gonadotropins and sex steroids for both adolescent transgender men and adolescent transgender women and slight effects on adrenal androgens. During GnRH agonist treatment, changes in body composition and body shape were greater for adolescent transgender people than for cisgender adolescent people. Further research is needed to better understand the effects of GnRH agonists on drug metabolism and other pharmacokinetic processes for transgender adolescents receiving GnRH agonists and other gender-affirming medications.

Peripheral administration of a κ-opioid receptor agonist nalfurafine inactivates gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator activity in goats.

Neurons co-expressing kisspeptin, neurokinin B, and dynorphin A (KNDy neurons), located in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) of the hypothalamus, are indicated to be the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse generator. Dynorphin A is reported to suppress GnRH pulse generator activity. Nalfurafine is a selective agonist of the κ-opioid receptor (KOR), a receptor for dynorphin A, clinically used as an anti-pruritic drug. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of nalfurafine on GnRH pulse generator activity and luteinizing hormone (LH) pulses using female goats. Nalfurafine (0, 2, 4, 8, or 16 µg/head) was intravenously injected into ovariectomized Shiba goats. The multiple unit activity (MUA) in the ARC area was recorded, and plasma LH concentrations were measured 2 and 48 h before and after injection, respectively. The MUA volley interval during 0-2 h after injection was significantly increased in the nalfurafine 8 and 16 µg groups compared with the vehicle group. In 0-2 h after injection, the number of LH pulses was significantly decreased in the nalfurafine 8 and 16 µg groups, and the mean and baseline LH were significantly decreased in all nalfurafine-treated groups (2, 4, 8, and 16 µg) compared with the vehicle group. These results suggest that nalfurafine inhibits the activity of the GnRH pulse generator in the ARC, thus suppressing pulsatile LH secretion. Therefore, nalfurafine could be used as a reproductive inhibitor in mammals.

The effectiveness of prolonged downregulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) treatment in women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Adenomyosis can reduce the chance of clinical pregnancy in women undergoing assisted conception. Treatment with prolonged gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) downregulation prior to IVF/ICSI has been postulated to improve pregnancy outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of prolonged GnRHa treatment (minimum one month) versus no pre-treatment in women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF/ICSI using a systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: We searched electronic databases: Embase (OVID), MEDLINE® (OVID), APA PsycInfo (OVID), Maternity & Infant Care Database (MIDIRS (OVID), HMIC Health Management Information Consortium (OVID) and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception until 27th of March 2023. STUDY SELECTION AND SYNTHESIS: We included studies that reported on women with adenomyosis receiving GnRHa to down-regulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis for one to six months before IVF/ICSI. We pooled data using the Haensel-Mantel method and reported using Odds Ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the quality of included studies using the Newcastle-Ottowa Scale and confidence in evidence using the GRADE criteria. Bias analysis was conducted via the Cochrane recommended tool (RevMan Web, Academic License). MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: We screened 365 citations and eight retrospective studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 2422 women). The median age was 34 years [IQR 31.95-35.05], median BMI 21.30 kg/m2 [IQR 21.05-23.55] and median duration of GnRHa downregulation was 2.5 months [Range 1-4; IQR 1.37-3]. Women with adenomyosis receiving prolonged GnRHa treatment had a higher implantation rate 1/OR 1.69 [95 % CI 1.09, 2.56], I2 = 81 %, (P = 0.02) and clinical pregnancy rate 1/OR 1.42 [95 % CI 1.03, 2.0], I2 70 %, P = 0.03. There was no overall difference in live birth rate 1/OR 1.12 [95 % CI 0.70, 1.79], I2 = 78 %, p = 0.63), miscarriage rate 1/OR 0.92 [95 % CI 0.63, 1.28, P = 0.61, I2 0 % or mean number of oocytes retrieved (10 oocytes [IQR 8.95; 11.15] vs. 9.28 [IQR 8; 10.20], p = 0.22) between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The benefit of prolonged GnRHa treatment in women with adenomyosis undergoing assisted conception treatment is uncertain based on existing retrospective studies. Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were higher following prolonged downregulation in this population, though there was no statistically significant difference in live birth and miscarriage rates. Given the limited, low-quality existing data, there is a need for a well-designed, prospective randomised controlled trial to precisely evaluate the effectiveness of prolonged GnRHa treatment in this population.

Economic evaluation of GnRH-agonist long protocol and GnRH-antagonist protocol in IVT/ICSI among the Chinese population: using pharmacoeconomic models.

OBJECTIVE: This paper uses health economics methods to discuss the cost-effectiveness value of long protocol and antagonist protocol for in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer (ET) in the Chinese population. DESIGN: Health economic evaluation study. SETTING: The data needed to construct the model for this study were derived from published studies and other secondary sources in China. PARTICIPANTS: No patients participated in the study. MEASURES: The main outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) and cost. From the societal perspective, we considered the direct and indirect costs over the course of the treatment cycles. A cost-effectiveness was measured using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and the probability that a protocol has higher net monetary benefit. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to verify the reliability of the simulation results. RESULTS: For the Chinese population, the long protocol resulted in a higher LBR than the antagonist protocol (29.33% vs 20.39%), but at the same time, it was more expensive (ï¿¥29 146.26 (US$4333.17) vs ï¿¥23 343.70 (US$3470.51)), in the case of considering only one fresh ET cycle. It was the same when considering subsequent frozen ET (FET) cycles (51.78% vs 42.81%; ï¿¥30 703.02 (US$4564.62) vs ï¿¥24 740.95 (US$3678.24)). The results of most subgroups were consistent with the results of the basic analysis. However, for certain populations, the long protocol was the inferior protocol (less effective and more expensive). CONCLUSION: For the Chinese population, when the monetary value per live birth was greater than ï¿¥65 420 (US$9726) and ï¿¥66 400 (US$9872), respectively, considering only one fresh cycle and considering subsequent frozen cycles, the long protocol is the preferred protocol. This threshold also varies for women of different ages and ovarian response capacities. For women in POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number) group 2, group 3 and group 4, antagonist protocol is recommended as the preferred protocol. The results of this study need to be verified by further large-scale randomised controlled trials.

Effectiveness of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a) and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) are conventional conservative treatments for adenomyosis, and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel ablation technique. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of HIFU combined with GnRH-a or LNG-IUS for adenomyosis patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were searched up to December 2021. Published studies comparing HIFU plus GnRH-a with HIFU plus LNG-IUS in adenomyosis patients were assessed for eligibility by two independent authors. Risk of bias tool was utilized for risk evaluation. We selected treatment effective rate of dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as the primary outcome; effective rate of menorrhagia severity and reduction rate of adenomyotic lesion as the secondary outcomes. Adverse effects were assessed. Four studies with a total 729 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. HIFU plus LNG-IUS showed lower dysmenorrhea [within 6 months: risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-0.93, p < 0.00001; over 1 year: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.82, p < 0.00001] and less menorrhagia severity (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60-0.66, p < 0.00001) than HIFU plus GnRH-a. Both groups demonstrated equal efficacy in adenomyotic lesion reduction rate (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97-1.09, p = 0.30). Adverse effects happened equally in both groups. Combination therapy of HIFU and LNG-IUS revealed better effectiveness in treating dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia than that of HIFU and GnRH-a. However, interpreting the conclusion should be approached with caution as a result of significant heterogeneity.

Serum INSL3 measured by LC-MS/MS in pubertal girls and in girls with precocious puberty during GnRH agonist treatment.

Introduction: The peptide hormone Insulin-like Factor 3 (INSL3) is a biomarker of testicular Leydig cells in the male but is also expressed by the theca cells of the ovaries. With the advent of sensitive assays INSL3 can be quantified in female circulation, and we suggest that circulating INSL3 is a novel biomarker for pubertal development in girls. The aim of the study is to quantify INSL3 by LC-MS/MS in sera from normal girls during pubertal transition, and during gonadal suppression by GnRH agonist therapy in girls with central precocious puberty (CPP). Method: The sensitivity of an established LC-MS/MS-based method for serum INSL3 was improved by switching to a state-of-the-art triple quadruple mass spectrometer (Altis Plus, Thermo). Results: The limit of detection of the improved LC-MS/MS method for serum INSL3 was 0.01 ug/L (1.5 pM) and the inter-assay CV was < 12%. Serum INSL3 increased during the pubertal transition in healthy girls and changes correlated with the concomitant rise in other measured hormones. In some girls, but not all, INSL3, FSH, inhibin B and estradiol serum concentrations increased prior to first clinical signs of puberty. Serum INSL3 concentrations were increased at baseline in girls with CPP compared to prepubertal controls and decreased during treatment with GnRH agonist followed by a steep rise and normalization after cessation of treatment. Conclusion: The improved method allowed for quantification of INSL3 in longitudinally collected serum samples during pubertal transition in healthy girls as well as in girls with CPP before, during and after treatment with GnRH agonist. Future studies are needed to clarify if INSL3 in combination with other biomarkers enhances the predictive value of differentiating between premature thelarche and CPP.

[Comparative Study of the Embryo Development and Clinical Outcomes of 3 Ovarian Stimulation Protocols in Different Age Groups]. / 不同年龄段人群三种促排卵方案胚胎发育及临床结局比较.

Objective: The main purpose of this study is to compare the embryo development and clinical outcomes of women in different age groups undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) processes using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, GnRH agonist long protocol, and early follicular phase protocol. We aim to provide reliable reference for future clinical treatments. Methods: We conducted a detailed analysis of patients who underwent treatment between January 2021 and February 2023. 1) In the overall patient population, we comprehensively compared the basic characteristics, the embryo development, and the clinical outcomes of patients treated with three different ovarian stimulation protocols, including the GnRH antagonist protocol group (n=4173), the agonist long protocol group (n=2410), and the early follicular phase long protocol group (n=341). 2) We divided the overall population into three age groups, one group for patients under 30 years old (n=2576), one for patients aged 30-35 (n=3249), and one for patients older than 35 years old (n=1099). Then, we compared the three stimulation protocols based on the group division. We separately compared the embryo development and clinical outcomes of patients using the three stimulation protocols in the under 30 years old, the 30-35 years old, and the over 35 years old age groups. With this analysis, we aimed to explore the response of different age groups to different stimulation protocols and their impact on the success rate of IVF. Results: 1) In the overall population, we found that the average number of oocytes retrieved in the GnRH agonist long protocol group was significantly higher than that in the GnRH antagonist protocol group ([13.85±7.162] vs. [13.36±7.862], P=0.0224), as well as the early follicular phase long protocol group ([13.85±7.162] vs. [11.86±6.802], P<0.0001). Patients in the GnRH antagonist protocol group not only had a significantly lower starting dose of gonadotrophin (Gn) compared to the other two groups (P<0.05) but also had a significantly lower number of days of Gn use (P<0.05). The blastocyst formation rate in the GnRH antagonist protocol group was the highest among the three groups, significantly higher compared to the GnRH agonist long protocol group (64.91% vs. 62.35%, P<0.0001) and the early follicular phase long protocol group (64.91% vs. 61.18%, P=0.0001). However, there were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rates or the live birth rates among the three groups treated with different ovarian stimulation protocols (P>0.05). 2) In the <30 age group, the blastocyst formation rate in the GnRH antagonist protocol group was the highest among the three groups, significantly higher compared to the GnRH agonist long protocol group (66.12% vs. 63.33%, P<0.0001) and the early follicular phase long protocol group (66.12% vs. 62.13%, P=0.0094). In the 30-35 age group, the blastocyst formation rate in the GnRH antagonist protocol group was the highest among the three groups, significantly higher compared to the GnRH agonist long protocol group (64.88% vs. 62.93%, P=0.000 9) and the early follicular phase long protocol group (64.88% vs. 60.39%, P=0.0011). In the >35 age group, the blastocyst formation rate in the GnRH antagonist protocol group was significantly higher than that in the GnRH agonist long protocol group (59.83% vs. 56.51%, P=0.0093), while there was no significant difference compared to that of the early follicular phase long protocol group (P>0.05). In the three age groups, we found that there were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and neonatal outcome indicators (fetal weight and Apgar score) among the three stimulation protocols (antagonist protocol, GnRH agonist long protocol, and early follicular phase long protocol) (P>0.05). The findings showed no significant differences between clinical and neonatal outcomes in patients of all ages, regardless of the ovarian stimulation protocol, suggesting that the three ovarian stimulation protocols have similar therapeutic effects in patients of different ages. The results of this study have important implications for the selection of an appropriate ovarian stimulation protocol and the prediction of treatment outcomes. Conclusion: In the younger than 30 and 30-35 age groups, the GnRH antagonist protocol showed a more significant advantage over the GnRH agonist long protocol and the early follicular phase long protocol. This suggests that for younger and middle-aged patients, the antagonist protocol may lead to better outcomes during ovarian stimulation. In the older than 35 age group, while the antagonist protocol still outperformed the GnRH agonist long protocol, there was no significant difference compared to the early follicular phase long protocol. This may imply that with increasing age, the early follicular phase long protocol may have effects similar to the antagonist protocol to some extent. The advantages of the antagonist protocol lie in its ability to reduce stimulation duration and the dosage of GnRH, while enhancing patient compliance with treatment. This means that patients may find it easier to accept and adhere to this treatment protocol, thereby improving treatment success rates. Particularly for older patients, the use of the antagonist protocol may significantly increase the blastocyst formation rate, which is crucial for improving the success rates. Although there were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes of patients treated with the three protocols in each age group, further research is still needed to validate these findings. Future multicenter studies and increased sample sizes may help comprehensively assess the efficacy of different stimulation protocols. Additionally, prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings and determine the optimal treatment strategies.

Does Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Administration Before Assisted Reproduction Techniques Improve Pregnancy Rates in Women With Endometriosis?

Importance: Axial downregulation with a 3- to 6-month administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) prior to assisted reproduction techniques has been proposed in order to improve clinical pregnancy rates in women with endometriosis. Although reduced inflammation, improved oocyte quality, and restored endometrial receptivity have been postulated, further investigation of their actual benefit and mechanism of action is considered essential. In that direction, well-designed clinical trials regarding the role of GnRH-a in IVF are necessary. Objective: The purpose of this review is to clarify whether GnRH-a administration prior to IVF-FET procedures improves pregnancy rates in women with endometriosis. Evidence Acquisition: A literature review was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane, and Google Scholar and concluded on September 10, 2022. Results: Two Cochrane meta-analyses and 16 selected studies present various interesting data of assisted reproduction technique procedures on patients with endometriosis-related infertility with or without depot GnRH-a pretreatment. Conclusions: The regimen may have a positive clinical effect on cases of severe endometriosis (American Society for Reproductive Medicine stages III-IV), but their use is not routinely recommended in order to improve pregnancy rates. Relevance: Endometriosis and infertility are closely related through various pathogenetic mechanisms. Endometriosis has been traditionally considered to negatively affect fundamental aspects of the in vitro fertilization-frozen embryo transfer procedure. Numerous interventions, both medical and surgical, have been proposed in order to improve IVF success rates, and the optimal management of these cases poses an ever pressing challenge.

Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG (double trigger) for final oocyte maturation increases the number of top-quality embryos in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of a double trigger, involving the co-administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for final oocyte maturation, is emerging as a novel approach in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). This protocol involves administering GnRH-a and hCG 40 and 34 h prior to ovum pick-up (OPU), respectively. This treatment modality has been implemented in patients with low/poor oocytes yield. This study aimed to determine whether the double trigger could improve the number of top-quality embryos (TQEs) in patients with fewer than three TQEs. METHODS: The stimulation characteristics of 35 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles were analyzed. These cycles were triggered by the combination of hCG and GnRHa (double trigger cycles) and compared to the same patients' previous IVF attempt, which utilized the hCG trigger (hCG trigger control cycles). The analysis involved cases who were admitted to our reproductive center between January 2018 and December 2022. In the hCG trigger control cycles, all 35 patients had fewer than three TQEs. RESULTS: Patients who received the double trigger cycles yielded a significantly higher number of 2PN cleavage embryos (3.54 ± 3.37 vs. 2.11 ± 2.15, P = 0.025), TQEs ( 2.23 ± 2.05 vs. 0.89 ± 0.99, P < 0.001), and a simultaneously higher proportion of the number of cleavage stage embryos (53.87% ± 31.38% vs. 39.80% ± 29.60%, P = 0.043), 2PN cleavage stage embryos (43.89% ± 33.01% vs. 27.22% ± 27.13%, P = 0.014), and TQEs (27.05% ± 26.26% vs. 14.19% ± 19.76%, P = 0.019) to the number of oocytes retrieved compared with the hCG trigger control cycles, respectively. The double trigger cycles achieved higher rates of cumulative clinical pregnancy (20.00% vs. 2.86%, P = 0.031), cumulative persistent pregnancy (14.29% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), and cumulative live birth (14.29% vs. 0%, P < 0.001) per stimulation cycle compared with the hCG trigger control cycles. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG for final oocyte maturation, 40 and 34 h prior to OPU, respectively (double trigger) may be suggested as a valuable new regimen for treating patients with low TQE yield in previous hCG trigger IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

Ovarian hyperthecosis in adolescent females: two case reports and a review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: Ovarian hyperthecosis (OHT) is a rare cause of severe hyperandrogenism in the adolescent age group. We describe two case reports, and present an approach to management in this age group based on a review of the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: Patient A presented at age 13 years with a 2 year history of androphonia and hirsuitism. Her testosterone level was elevated at 8.3 nmol/L, and there was marked enlargement of her ovaries bilaterally. There were no focal adrenal or ovarian lesions identified on imaging. She was treated with a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and spironolactone with biochemical and clinical improvement. Patient B presented at age 14 years with secondary amenorrhoea, and a 2 year history of androphonia, hirsutism and androgenetic alopecia. Her testosterone level was 12 nmol/L, and a pelvic ultrasound revealed numerous follicles in each ovary which were otherwise normal in size. She was managed with GnRH agonist initially, and now continues on a combined oral contraceptive pill. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian hyperthecosis needs to be considered in pre-menopausal women presenting with severe hyperandrogenism, after exclusion of androgen-producing adrenal and ovarian tumours. The principles of management in this age group are gonadotropin suppression and hormone replacement.

The influence of ghrelin agonist ipamorelin acetate on the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis in a cichlid fish, Oreochromis mossambicus.

Ghrelin, a peptide found in the brain and gut, is predicted to play a significant role in the control of various physiological systems in fish. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of ipamorelin acetate (IPA), a ghrelin agonist, on the reproductive axis of the tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus. The administration of either 5 or 30 µg of IPA for 21 days led to a significant and dose-dependent rise in food intake concomitant with a significant increase in the numbers of primary spermatocytes, secondary spermatocytes, and early spermatids compared to the control group. There was a significant rise in the number of late spermatids, as well as the areas of the lobule and lumen, in fish treated with 30 µg of IPA, compared to the control group. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the percentage of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-immunoreactive fibres in the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary gland across different groups. However, a significant elevation in the expression of androgen receptor protein was observed in fish treated with 30 µg of IPA. Furthermore, the concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) and 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT) in the serum of fish treated with either 5 or 30 µg of IPA were significantly elevated in comparison to the control group. Collectively, these findings suggest that the administration of ghrelin enhances the development of germ cells during the meiosis-I phase and that this effect might be mediated via the stimulation of 11-KT and androgen receptors at the testicular level and LH at the pituitary level in the tilapia.