RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and microbiological risk factors associated with mortality in patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. METHODS: This multicentric prospective cohort study included hospitalized adult patients with a microbiologically confirmed infection treated with ceftazidime-avibactam for ≥48 hours. The clinical and microbiological risk factors for 30-day mortality were evaluated using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: Of the 193 patients evaluated from the five tertiary hospitals, 127 were included in the study. Thirty-five patients (27.6%) died within 30 days. Infections with AmpC beta-lactamase-carrying bacteria were independently related to 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-4.84, P < 0.01) after adjusting for time from infection to antimicrobial prescription (P = 0.04). Further, these bacterial infections were also related to higher in-hospital mortality (aHR 2.17, 95% CI 1.24-3.78, P < 0.01). Only one patient developed resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam had worse clinical outcomes in patients with infections with bacteria with chromosomally encoded AmpC beta-lactamase. However, these findings should be confirmed in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Compuestos de Azabiciclo , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Adulto , Humanos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversos , Ceftazidima/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited comparative data exist on acute kidney injury (AKI) risk and AKI-associated outcomes in hospitalized patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections (CR-GNIs) treated with a newer ß-lactam/ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BL-BLI)-, polymyxin (PB)- or aminoglycoside (AG)-containing regimen. This study quantified the risk of AKI and AKI-related outcomes among patients with CR-GNIs treated with a newer BL/BL-BLI-, PB- or AG-containing regimen. METHODS: A multicentre, retrospective, observational study was performed (2016-20). The study included adult hospitalized patients with (i) baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2; (ii) CR-GN pneumonia, complicated urinary tract infection or bloodstream infection; and (iii) receipt of newer BL/BL-BLI, PG or AG within 7 days of index CR-GN culture for ≥3 days. Outcomes included AKI, in-hospital mortality and hospital costs. RESULTS: The study included 750 patients and most (48%) received a newer BL/BL-BLI. The median (IQR) treatment duration was 8 (5-11), 5 (4-8) and 7 (4-8) days in the newer BL/BL-BLI group, AG group and PB group, respectively. The PB group had the highest adjusted AKI incidence (95% CI) (PB: 25.1% (15.6%-34.6%) versus AG: 8.9% (5.7%-12.2%) versus newer BL/BL-BLI: 11.9% (8.1%-15.7%); P = 0.001). Patients with AKI had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (AKI: 18.5% versus 'No AKI': 5.6%; P = 0.001) and mean hospital costs (AKI: $49 192 versus 'No AKI': $38,763; P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: The AKI incidence was highest among PB patients and patients with AKI had worse outcomes. Healthcare systems should consider minimizing the use of antibiotics that augment AKI risk as a measure to improve outcomes in patients with CR-GNIs.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas , Adulto , Humanos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversos , beta-Lactamas , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Polimixinas , Lactamas , Aminoglicósidos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
FL058 is a novel diazabicyclooctane ß-lactamase inhibitor. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and population pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis of FL058 alone and in combination with meropenem in healthy subjects. The results showed that the maximum tolerated dose of FL058 was 3,000 mg after single-dose infusion. FL058 in combination with meropenem did not cause any grade 3 or higher adverse event when the dose was escalated up to 1,000 mg/2,000 mg. FL058 exposure PK parameters showed dose proportionality. FL058 was excreted primarily in urine. No significant PK interaction was found between FL058 and meropenem. Population PK model analysis indicated that the PK profiles of FL058 and meropenem were consistent with the two-compartment model. The impact of covariates, creatinine clearance, concomitant use of meropenem, body weight, sex, and FL058 dose, on FL058 exposure was less than 10%. FL058/meropenem combination was safe and well tolerated up to a 1,000-mg/2,000-mg dose in healthy adults. The recommended minimum dose of FL058/meropenem combination was 500 mg/1,000 mg by intravenous infusion over 2 h every 8 h based on target attainment analysis. The good safety, tolerability, and satisfactory PK profiles of FL058 alone and in combination with meropenem in this first-in-human study will support further clinical development of FL058 in combination with meropenem in patients with target infections (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT05055687, NCT05058118, and NCT05058105).
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas , Adulto , Humanos , Meropenem/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Voluntarios Sanos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversos , Infusiones IntravenosasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-sparing antibiotics are needed urgently for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). Although several novel antibiotics - novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (e.g. ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam) and a novel tetracycline derivative (eravacycline) - have been developed for cIAIs, it remains unclear whether these antibiotics are comparable to carbapenems for the treatment of cIAIs. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted until 1 October 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the clinical efficacy and safety of novel antibiotics against carbapenems for patients with cIAIs were included. RESULTS: Among the 11 selected RCTs, no significant differences in clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure visit were observed between the study group and the control group on analysis of the clinically evaluable population [93.6% vs 93.7%, risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.01; P=0.84], microbiologically evaluable population (93.0% vs 94.5%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00; P=0.10) and modified intention-to-treat population (85.9% vs 87.7%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.01; P=0.13). All findings were consistent across the subgroup analyses and sensitivity tests. Similarly, no significant difference in microbiological eradication was observed between the study group and the control group (87.8% vs 89.7%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.01; P=0.18). The risk of adverse events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical efficacy, microbiological response and safety of the novel antibiotics, including ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam and eravacycline, are comparable to carbapenems for the treatment of patients with cIAIs. These agents can be potential therapeutic options as carbapenem-sparing antibiotics for cIAIs.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones Intraabdominales , Humanos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Carbapenémicos/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ceftazidima/efectos adversos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/microbiología , Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Importance: Cefepime/enmetazobactam is a novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination and a potential empirical therapy for resistant gram-negative infections. Objective: To evaluate whether cefepime/enmetazobactam was noninferior to piperacillin/tazobactam for the primary outcome of treatment efficacy in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) or acute pyelonephritis. Design, Setting, and Participants: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter, noninferiority clinical trial conducted at 90 sites in Europe, North and Central America, South America, and South Africa. Recruitment occurred between September 24, 2018, and November 2, 2019. Final follow-up occurred November 26, 2019. Participants were adult patients aged 18 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of complicated UTI or acute pyelonephritis caused by gram-negative urinary pathogens. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomized to receive either cefepime, 2 g/enmetazobactam, 0.5 g (n = 520), or piperacillin, 4 g/tazobactam, 0.5 g (n = 521), by 2-hour infusion every 8 hours for 7 days (up to 14 days in patients with a positive blood culture at baseline). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in the primary analysis set (patients who received any amount of study drug with a baseline gram-negative pathogen not resistant to either treatment and ≥105 colony-forming units [CFU]/mL in urine culture or the same pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures) who achieved overall treatment success (defined as clinical cure combined with microbiological eradication [<103 CFU/mL in urine] of infection). Two-sided 95% CIs were computed using the stratified Newcombe method. The prespecified noninferiority margin was -10%. If noninferiority was established, a superiority comparison was also prespecified. Results: Among 1041 patients randomized (mean age, 54.7 years; 573 women [55.0%]), 1034 (99.3%) received study drug and 995 (95.6%) completed the trial. Among the primary analysis set, the primary outcome occurred in 79.1% (273/345) of patients receiving cefepime/enmetazobactam compared with 58.9% (196/333) receiving piperacillin/tazobactam (between-group difference, 21.2% [95% CI, 14.3% to 27.9%]). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.0% (258/516) of patients treated with cefepime/enmetazobactam and 44.0% (228/518) with piperacillin/tazobactam; most were mild to moderate in severity (89.9% vs 88.6%, respectively). A total of 1.7% (9/516) of participants who received cefepime/enmetazobactam and 0.8% (4/518) of those who received piperacillin/tazobactam did not complete the assigned therapy due to adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with complicated UTI or acute pyelonephritis caused by gram-negative pathogens, cefepime/enmetazobactam, compared with piperacillin/tazobactam, met criteria for noninferiority as well as superiority with respect to the primary outcome of clinical cure and microbiological eradication. Further research is needed to determine the potential role for cefepime/enmetazobactam in the treatment of complicated UTI and pyelonephritis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03687255.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Cefepima , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Pielonefritis , Infecciones Urinarias , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas , Enfermedad Aguda , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefepima/administración & dosificación , Cefepima/efectos adversos , Cefepima/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/administración & dosificación , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/efectos adversos , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Pielonefritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Pielonefritis/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The beta-lactam antibiotic amoxicillin and the beta-lactamase inhibitor clavulanic acid in combination with amoxicillin are known to cause both immediate- and nonimmediate-type hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVE: To characterize a large cohort of patients with a history of amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid hypersensitivity. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of the demographics, presentation, investigation, and management of 331 patients presenting to 1 allergy center with a history of hypersensitivity to amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. RESULTS: Hypersensitivity was confirmed in 37 of 221 patients (17%) who took amoxicillin and 47 of 110 patients (43%) who took amoxicillin-clavulanic acid as the index drug. In immediate hypersensitivity, skin test results confirmed the diagnosis in 66 of 139 patients (47%). Penicillin cross-reactivity was observed in 16 of 36 patients (44%). Of the 16 patients who were cross-reactive, 13 (81%) reacted to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid as the index drug. All patients who had negative skin test results (73/139) underwent drug provocation. The negative predictive value of skin tests was 89%. In nonimmediate hypersensitivity, delayed intradermal tests confirmed diagnosis in 12 of 170 patients (7%). Of the 12 patients whose skin test results were positive, 8 (67%) presented with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. All patients with a negative skin test result (158/170) underwent drug provocation. The negative predictive value of skin tests was 95%. Penicillin cross-reactivity was observed in 3 of 12 patients (25%). Ten patients were diagnosed with hypersensitivity to clavulanic acid. CONCLUSION: The negative predictive value of skin tests in both immediate and nonimmediate hypersensitivity reactions is excellent and excludes severe allergy. Nonimmediate hypersensitivity is rare. Confirmed hypersensitivity is more likely if amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is the index drug. Cross-reactivity was more common in patients presenting with immediate hypersensitivity, typically involving benzylpenicillin. A minority of patients were allergic to clavulanic acid.
Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Ácido Clavulánico/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Humanos , Monobactamas , Penicilina G , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pruebas Cutáneas , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations in adult patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and EBSCO databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published before 13 September 2020. Only RCTs comparing the treatment efficacy of novel BL/BLI combinations with other antibiotics for HAP/VAP in adult patients were included in this integrated analysis. RESULTS: Three RCTs were included and no significant difference in clinical cure rate of test of cure was observed between the novel BL/BLI combinations and comparators [odds ratio (OR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.27; I2 = 35%]. The 28-day all-cause mortality was 16.2% and 17.6% for patients receiving novel BL/BLI combinations and comparators, respectively, and no significant difference was noted (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.69-1.16; I2 = 11%). Compared with comparators, novel BL/BLI combinations were associated with a similar microbiological response (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.73-1.54; I2 = 64%) and a similar risk of adverse events (AEs) [treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs): OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.83-1.30; I2 = 0%; serious AEs: OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.79-1.63; I2 = 68%; treatment discontinuation for TEAE: OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.62-1.31; I2 = 11%). CONCLUSION: Clinical and microbiological responses of novel BL/BLI combinations in the treatment of HAP/VAP were similar to those of other available antibiotics. These combinations also shared a similar safety profile to comparators.
Asunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Hospitales , Humanos , Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversos , beta-Lactamas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Taniborbactam (formerly VNRX-5133), an investigational ß-lactamase inhibitor active against both serine- and metallo-ß-lactamases, is being developed in combination with cefepime to treat serious infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of taniborbactam in healthy adult subjects. Single doses of 62.5 to 1,500 mg taniborbactam and multiple doses of 250 to 750 mg taniborbactam every 8 h (q8h) for 10 days were examined; all taniborbactam doses were administered as a 2-h intravenous infusion. No subjects experienced serious adverse events or discontinued treatment due to adverse events. The most common adverse event in both placebo- and taniborbactam-treated subjects was headache. The pharmacokinetics of taniborbactam were similar to the pharmacokinetics reported for cefepime. Taniborbactam demonstrated dose-proportional pharmacokinetics with low intersubject variability. Following single doses and with extended sampling, the mean terminal elimination half-life ranged from 3.4 to 5.8 h; however, the majority of exposure was characterized by an earlier phase with a half-life of about 2 h. Following multiple dosing, there was minimal accumulation of taniborbactam in plasma. At steady-state, approximately 90% of the administered dose of taniborbactam was recovered in urine as intact drug. There was no appreciable metabolism observed in either plasma or urine samples. (This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov under registration number NCT02955459.).
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Borínicos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas , Adulto , Ácidos Borínicos/efectos adversos , Ácidos Carboxílicos , Método Doble Ciego , Semivida , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes is supposed to be induced by environmental factors. Microbiome modulated by antibiotics seems to serve as one of the environmental factors which could influence the development of T1DM. Mitochondria, as autochthonous environmental bacteria living in our cells, and other bacteria share many common enzymes including beta-lactamases and it is supported by evidence that some beta-lactamase inhibitors are able to interact with counterpart enzymes. Thus, antibiotics may utilize two different pathways influencing the development of T1DM; one through modulation of microbiome and a second one via the interaction of mitochondrial enzymes. Data of consumption of penicillin (both narrow and broad spectrum) and beta-lactamase inhibitors in 30 European countries were collected from the database of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. These data were correlated with the prevalence reported by the International Diabetes Federation (2019) referring to type 1 diabetes in Europe. No correlation was found between total penicillin consumption or use of broad spectrum penicillin and the prevalence of type 1 diabetes. Nevertheless, broad spectrum penicillin, in combination with beta-lactamase inhibitor, was in inverse correlation with the prevalence of type 1 diabetes (r = - 0.573, p = 0.001). On the other hand, narrow spectrum penicillin was in positive correlation with type 1 diabetes (r = 0.523, p = 0.003). Prevalence of type 1 diabetes showed an inverse correlation with the use of beta-lactamase inhibitors and a positive one with that of narrow spectrum penicillin. Such a detailed analysis has not so far been provided referring to the penicillin group. In the background of this association either microbiomal or direct mitochondrial effects can be supposed.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Penicilinas , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Penicilinas/administración & dosificación , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Prevalencia , Adulto Joven , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Importance: Acute bacterial sinusitis is common, but currently recommended antibiotic treatment provides minimal benefit. Objective: To confirm the previous finding that high-dose amoxicillin plus clavulanate (with double the amount of amoxicillin) may be superior to standard-dose amoxicillin plus clavulanate in adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, comparative-effectiveness randomized clinical trial was conducted from February 26, 2018, through May 10, 2020, at the academic primary care internal medicine and pediatrics practice of Albany Medical Center, located in Cohoes, New York. Participants included adults aged 18 years or older who were prescribed amoxicillin plus clavulanate for acute bacterial sinusitis diagnosed in accordance with the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. Interventions: Amoxicillin 875 mg with clavulanate 125 mg plus either placebo (standard dose) or amoxicillin 875 mg (high dose) twice a day for 7 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was a global rating of "a lot better" or "no symptoms" at the end of 3 days of treatment using a Global Rating of Improvement scale, with outcomes ranging from 1 (a lot worse) to 6 (no symptoms). The primary adverse effect outcome was severe diarrhea at 3 or 10 days after the start of treatment. Results: At an unplanned interim analysis prompted by COVID-19 restrictions, 157 of a projected 240 participants had been enrolled (mean age, 48.5 [range, 18.7-84.0] years; 117 women [74.5%]), with 79 randomized to the standard dose and 78 to the high dose; 9 and 12, respectively, withdrew or were lost to follow-up before the assessment of the primary outcome. At day 3, 31 of 70 participants (44.3%) in the standard-dose group reported a global rating of "a lot better" or "no symptoms," as did 24 of 66 (36.4%) in the high-dose group, for a difference of -7.9% (95% CI, -24.4% to 8.5%; P = .35). The study was, therefore, stopped for futility. Diarrhea was common in both groups by day 3, with any diarrhea reported in 29 of 71 participants (40.8%) receiving the standard dose and 28 of 65 (43.1%) receiving the high dose and severe diarrhea reported in 5 of 71 (7.0%) and 5 of 65 (7.7%), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that adults treated for clinically diagnosed acute sinusitis did not appear to benefit from taking high-dose compared with standard-dose amoxicillin plus clavulanate. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03431337.
Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina , Ácido Clavulánico , Sinusitis , Enfermedad Aguda , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Ácido Clavulánico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Clavulánico/efectos adversos , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sinusitis/diagnóstico , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The post-antibiotic effect (PAE) of ceftazidime-avibactam in vivo was evaluated using models of thigh- and lung-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in neutropenic mice. In thigh-infected mice, the PAE was negative (-2.18 to -0.11 h) for three of four strains: caused by a 'burst' of rapid bacterial growth after the drug concentrations had fallen below their pre-specified target values. With lung infection, PAE was positive, and longer for target drug concentrations in ELF (>2 h) than plasma (1.69-1.88 h). The time to the start of regrowth was quantified as a new parameter, PAER, which was positive (0.35-1.00 h) in both thigh- and lung-infected mice. In the context that measurements of the PAE of ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations in vivo have not previously been reported, it is noted that the negative values were consistent with previous measurements of the PAE of ceftazidime-avibactam in vitro and of ceftazidime alone in vivo.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéutico , Animales , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/efectos adversos , Ceftazidima/administración & dosificación , Ceftazidima/efectos adversos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/fisiología , Femenino , Ratones , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Neumonía Bacteriana/etiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Muslo/microbiología , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The purpose of this study is to characterize adverse events (AEs) of clinical interest reported with ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, as an aid in monitoring patients affected by severe multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. We queried the worldwide FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and performed disproportionality analysis, selecting only designated medical events (DMEs) where ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam were reported as suspect. Serious neurological AEs were further investigated. The reporting odds ratios were calculated, deemed significant by the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (LL95% CI) > 1. All other drugs/events recorded in FAERS and cephalosporins showing clinical evidence of neurological AEs were respectively selected as comparator for analysis of DMEs and neurotoxicity. Qualitative analysis including case-by-case assessment and deduplication was also performed. Overall, 654 and 506 reports mentioning respectively ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam were found, with DMEs accounting respectively for 13.1% and 10.9% of cases. Agranulocytosis (N = 12; LL95% CI = 12.40) and pancytopenia (14; 6.18) emerged as unexpected AEs with ceftolozane-tazobactam, while acute pancreatitis (7; 8.63) was an over-reported unexpected DME with ceftazidime-avibactam. After deduplication, four unequivocally different cases of agranulocytosis with ceftolozane-tazobactam were retained, occurring on average after 8.8 days. Causality was probable and possible respectively in three and one case. Among neurological AEs exhibiting significant disproportionality, encephalopathy with both antibiotics and mental status changes with ceftazidime-avibactam were retained in at least three cases after deduplication. Although rare, clinicians should monitor high-risk patients (i.e. individuals affected by haematological malignances, HIV infection, or treated with concomitant myelotoxic agents) for early unexpected occurrence of agranulocytosis with ceftolozane-tazobactam.
Asunto(s)
Agranulocitosis/etiología , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Lactamas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/efectos adversos , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/efectos adversos , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancitopenia/etiología , Farmacovigilancia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tazobactam/efectos adversos , Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% of the parents report suspected drug hypersensitivity reactions to at least one drug in their children, but most of these reactions are not confirmed after an adequate diagnostic work-up. The diagnosis of drugs hypersensitivity is frequently laborious and based on anamnesis, skin tests, serum specific IgE research and drug provocation test. Nevertheless, drug provocation test is necessary to confirm or definitively exclude the diagnosis of allergy. Aims of our study were to evaluate the real incidence of drug hypersensitivity in a large pediatric population and the validity of a short diagnostic algorithm. METHODS: One hundred nine patients with a history of self-reported, immediate and mild drug hypersensitivity reactions to ß-lactam antibiotics, macrolides and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs underwent drug provocation test without prior skin or blood tests. After one-year, a telephone questionnaire was conducted in order to evaluate patient's use of the tested drug and any reactions. RESULTS: Only 7 of the 109 patients (6.4%) resulted positive to drug provocation test. No severe reactions were reported. After the challenge, 64 patients took the culprit drug again within one year and only two reported a drug reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Drug hypersensitivity is highly overestimated. Our results prompt the opportunity to directly perform the challenge for those children with self-reported, mild and immediate drug hypersensitivity reaction.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Autoinforme , Adolescente , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Incidencia , Macrólidos/efectos adversos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Ceftazidime-avibactam combines the established anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin, ceftazidime, with the novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor, avibactam. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in adults using pooled data from two phase II (NCT00690378, NCT00752219) and five phase III (NCT01499290, NCT01726023, NCT01644643, NCT01808093 and NCT01595438/NCT01599806) clinical studies. METHODS: Safety data from seven multicentre, randomised, active-comparator studies were pooled by study group at the patient level for descriptive analyses, comprising patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including pyelonephritis, complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), or nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), treated with ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole or comparator. RESULTS: In total, 4050 patients (ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole, n = 2024; comparator, n = 2026) were included in the pooled analysis. Adverse events (AEs) up to the last study visit occurred in 996 (49.2%) and 965 (47.6%) patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole and comparator, respectively. The most common AEs across treatment groups were diarrhoea, nausea, headache, vomiting and pyrexia. There were few discontinuations due to AEs (2.5% and 1.7% for ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole and comparators, respectively). Overall rates of serious AEs were 8.7% for ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole and 7.2% for comparators; respective rates of AEs with an outcome of death were 2.0% and 1.8%. AEs considered causally related to the study drug or procedures occurred in 10.7% and 9.6% of patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole and comparators; the most common drug-related AEs in both groups were diarrhoea, headache, nausea and increased alanine aminotransferase. No impact to the safety profile of ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole was found with regard to intrinsic factors, such as age or renal function at baseline, or extrinsic factors, such as geographical origin. Potentially clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters were infrequent with no trends or safety concerns identified. CONCLUSION: The observed safety profile of ceftazidime-avibactam across infection types is consistent with the established safety profile of ceftazidime monotherapy and no new safety findings were identified. This analysis supports the use of ceftazidime-avibactam as a treatment option in adults with cUTI, cIAI and NP, including VAP.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/efectos adversos , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/administración & dosificación , Ceftazidima/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones/mortalidad , Infecciones Intraabdominales/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Metronidazol/efectos adversos , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/administración & dosificaciónAsunto(s)
Anafilaxia/etiología , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Argentina , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam are commonly used antibiotics. There is increasing evidence to indicate that these therapies in combination predispose patients to acute kidney injury (AKI). However, studies of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with these antibiotics have produced conflicting results. In this single-centre, retrospective cohort study, data was collected on ICU patients prescribed combination vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) for at least 48 h, compared with patients prescribed vancomycin with either cefepime or meropenem (VMC) for the same time period. Primary outcome was incidence of AKI; secondary outcomes included a desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) scale, and association between antibiotic duration and kidney injury. A total of 260 patients were included. AKI was observed in 27% of cases overall. Incidence of AKI was higher with VPT compared with VMC on bivariate (relative risk reduction [RRR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-4.1, P = 0.08) and multivariate (RRR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.9, P = 0.05) analyses. Longer duration of antibiotic therapy was associated with increased rates of AKI independent of which antibiotics were prescribed: RRR 4.9, 95% CI 2.1-11.1, P = <0.001 for 5-6 days compared with <5 days, and RRR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0-5.5, P = 0.05 for >7 days compared with <5 days. This study demonstrated an association between increased risk of nephrotoxicity and combination VPT therapy in ICU patients. The concept remains controversial, with recent suggestions that VPT does not truly cause nephrotoxicity. Given our findings and the weight of previous studies, there is a strong mandate to undertake prospective trials to resolve the issue.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/efectos adversos , Vancomicina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversos , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefepima/efectos adversos , Cefepima/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Duración de la Terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Riñón/patología , Masculino , Meropenem/efectos adversos , Meropenem/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Nacubactam is a novel ß-lactamase inhibitor with dual mechanisms of action as an inhibitor of serine ß-lactamases (classes A and C and some class D) and an inhibitor of penicillin binding protein 2 in Enterobacteriaceae The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous nacubactam were evaluated in single- and multiple-ascending-dose, placebo-controlled studies. Healthy participants received single ascending doses of nacubactam of 50 to 8,000 mg, multiple ascending doses of nacubactam of 1,000 to 4,000 mg every 8 h (q8h) for up to 7 days, or nacubactam of 2,000 mg plus meropenem of 2,000 mg q8h for 6 days after a 3-day lead-in period. Nacubactam was generally well tolerated, with the most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) being mild to moderate complications associated with intravenous access and headache. There was no apparent relationship between drug dose and the pattern, incidence, or severity of AEs. No clinically relevant dose-related trends were observed in laboratory safety test results. No serious AEs, dose-limiting AEs, or deaths were reported. After single or multiple doses, nacubactam pharmacokinetics appeared linear, and exposure increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner across the dose range investigated. Nacubactam was excreted largely unchanged into urine. Coadministration of nacubactam with meropenem did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of either drug. These findings support the continued clinical development of nacubactam and demonstrate the suitability of meropenem as a potential ß-lactam partner for nacubactam. (The studies described in this paper have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT02134834 [single ascending dose study] and NCT02972255 [multiple ascending dose study].).