Incidence of serious infections in the working-age Japanese adult population with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and interleukin-6 inhibitors: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

AIM: This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFαi) and interleukin-6 inhibitors (IL-6i), with no prior use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). METHODS: We employed the nationwide insurance claims database encompassing the years 2005 to 2018 in Japan. The inclusion criteria specified patients who were prescribed any type of bDMARDs, including TNFαi and IL-6i. The following exclusion criteria were applied: missing prescription dates, RA not diagnosed, below 16 years of age, bDMARDs prescribed within 6 months of registration, RA diagnosed post-bDMARDs prescription, and incidence of serious infections within 2 weeks before bDMARDs therapy. We applied stabilized inverse probability weights and utilized a Cox regression model to estimate the risk of serious infections associated with TNFαi and IL-6i. RESULTS: The cohort of 2493 patients with RA was categorized into a TNFαi group and an IL-6i group of 2018 and 475 participants, respectively. The median follow-up duration (interquartile range) was 347 (147-820) days in the TNFαi group and 369 (149-838) days in the IL-6i group. In the inverse probability-weighted cohort, the incidence rates (95% confidence interval) of serious infections were 2.13 (1.65-2.71) and 3.25 (2.15-4.69) per 100 person-years for the TNFαi and IL-6i groups, respectively. The hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) comparing the TNFαi group to the IL-6i group was 0.66 (0.36-1.20, p = 0.168). DISCUSSION: The results underscore the lack of evidence to preferentially favor either TNFαi or IL-6i as later-line therapy in the management of bDMARDs-naive RA to mitigate the risk of serious infections.

Natural products as IL-6 inhibitors for inflammatory diseases: Synthetic and SAR perspective.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6), a pleiotropic cytokine, plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of various diseases including diabetes, atherosclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, multiple myeloma, rheumatoid arthritis, and prostate cancer. The signaling pathways associated with IL-6 offer promising targets for therapeutic interventions in inflammatory diseases and IL-6-dependent tumors. Although certain anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibodies are currently employed clinically, their usage is hampered by drawbacks such as high cost and potential immunogenicity, limiting their application. Thus, the imperative arises to develop novel small non-peptide molecules acting as IL-6 inhibitors. Various natural products derived from diverse sources have been investigated for their potential to inhibit IL-6 activity. Nevertheless, these natural products remain inadequately explored in terms of their structure-activity relationships. In response, our review aims to provide syntheses and structure activity perspective of natural IL-6 inhibitors. The comprehensive amalgamation of information presented in this review holds the potential to serve as a foundation for forthcoming research endeavors by medicinal chemists, facilitating the design of innovative IL-6 inhibitors to address the complexities of inflammatory diseases.

IL-6 inhibitors and JAK inhibitors as favourable treatment options for patients with anaemia and rheumatoid arthritis: ANSWER cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Anaemia, a common comorbidity of RA, is related to high disease activity and poor prognosis. It is unknown which biologic/targeted synthetic (b/ts)-DMARDs are optimal for patients with anaemia and RA in regulating anaemia and controlling disease activity. METHODS: We investigated the change in haemoglobin (Hb) levels, drug retention rates and disease activities after the administration of b/ts-DMARDs with different modes of action [TNF inhibitors (TNFis), immunoglobulin fused with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA-4-Ig), IL-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ris) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis)] in patients with RA stratified by baseline Hb levels using the multicentre observational registry for patients with RA in Japan (ANSWER cohort). RESULTS: A total of 2093 patients with RA were classified into three groups based on tertiles of the baseline Hb levels (Hblow, anaemic; Hbint, intermediate; Hbhigh, non-anaemic). IL-6Ri increased Hb levels in all groups (the mean change at 12 months in Hblow was +1.5 g/dl, Hbint +0.7 g/dl and Hbhigh +0.1 g/dl). JAKis increased the Hb level in patients with anaemia and RA and retained or decreased the Hb level in non-anaemic patients (the mean change at 12 months in Hblow was +0.6 g/dl, Hbint 0 g/dl and Hbhigh -0.3 g/dl). In patients with anaemia and RA, overall adjusted 3-year drug retention rates were higher in JAKi followed by IL-6Ri, CTLA4-Ig and TNFi (78.6%, 67.9%, 61.8% and 50.8%, respectively). Change of disease activity at 12 months was not different among different b/ts-DMARDs treatments. CONCLUSION: IL-6Ri and JAKi can effectively treat patients with anaemia and RA in a real-world setting.

Safety of JAK and IL-6 inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter cohort study.

Background: The ORAL Surveillance trial showed a potentially higher incidence of malignancy and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) associated with tofacitinib than those associated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (TNFis). However, few studies have compared the safety of non-TNFis or other Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKis). This study was aimed at comparing the incidence rates (IRs) of malignancies and MACEs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated using interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitors (IL-6is) or JAKis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 427 patients with RA who were treated using an IL-6i (n = 273) or a JAKi (n = 154). We determined the IRs of malignancy and MACEs, and the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of malignancies and investigated factors related to malignancy and MACEs. After adjusting the clinical characteristic imbalance by propensity score matching (PSM), we compared the IRs of adverse events between the JAKi and IL-6i groups. Results: After PSM, the observational period was determined to be 605.27 patient-years (PY), and the median observational period was determined to be 2.28 years. We identified seven cases of malignancy (IR: 2.94 per 100 PY) in the JAKi-treated group and five cases (IR: 1.36 per 100 PY) in the IL-6i-treated group after PSM. The IR of MACEs was 2.56 and 0.83 (per 100 PY) in the JAKi- and IL-6i-treated groups. The IRRs of JAKi-treated patients versus IL-6i-treated patients were 2.13 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-7.42) for malignancy and 3.03 (95% CI: 0.77-15.21) for MACE. There were no significant differences in IRR for malignancy and MACE between both groups after PSM. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that older age and JAKi use were independent risk factors for malignancy, while older age, hypertension, and JAKi use were independent risk factors for MACEs. The overall malignancy SIR was significantly higher in the JAKi-treated group compared to the general population (2.10/100 PY, 95% CI: 1.23-2.97). Conclusion: The IRs of malignancy and MACE in patients with RA after PSM were comparable between IL-6i-treated and JAKi-treated patients. However, the SIR of malignancy in JAKi treatment was significantly higher than in the general population; therefore, further safety studies comparing JAKi to non-TNFi biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are needed.

Leveraging decagonal in-silico strategies for uncovering IL-6 inhibitors with precision.

Interleukin-6 upregulation leads to various acute phase reactions such as local inflammation and systemic inflammation in many diseases like cancer, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, anemia, and Alzheimer's disease stimulating JAK/STAT3, Ras/MAPK, PI3K-PKB/Akt pathogenic pathways. Since no small molecules are available in the market against IL-6 till now, we have designed a class of small bioactive 1,3 - indanedione (IDC) molecules for inhibiting IL-6 using a decagonal approach computational studies. The IL-6 mutations were mapped in the IL-6 protein (PDB ID: 1ALU) from thorough pharmacogenomic and proteomics studies. The protein-drug interaction networking analysis for 2637 FFDA-approved drugs with IL-6 protein using Cytoscape software showed that 14 drugs have prominent interactions with IL-6. Molecular docking studies showed that the designed compound IDC-24 (-11.8 kcal/mol) and methotrexate (-5.20) bound most strongly to the 1ALU south asian population mutated protein. MMGBSA results indicated that IDC-24 (-41.78 kcal/mol) and methotrexate (-36.81 kcal/mol) had the highest binding energy when compared to the standard molecules LMT-28 (-35.87 kcal/mol) and MDL-A (-26.18 kcal/mol). These results we substantiated by the molecular dynamic studies in which the compound IDC-24 and the methotrexate had the highest stability. Further, the MMPBSA computations produced energies of -28 kcal/mol and -14.69 kcal/mol for IDC-24 and LMT-28. KDeep absolute binding affinity computations revealed energies of -5.81 kcal/mol and -4.74 kcal/mol for IDC-24 and LMT-28 respectively. Finally, our decagonal approach established the compound IDC-24 from the designed 1,3-indanedione library and methotrexate from protein drug interaction networking as suitable HITs against IL-6.

Hemofiltration as an Alternative for IL-6 Inhibitors in COVID-19 Cytokines Storm Associated with Underlaying Bacterial Infections: A Review Article.

SARS-CoV-2 causes mostly mild cases. However, a considerable number of patients develop fatal acute respiratory distress syndrome due to the cytokine storm and imbalanced immune response. Several therapies depending on immunomodulation have been used, including glucocorticoids and IL-6 blockers. However, their efficacy is not perfect with all patients and patients with concomitant bacterial infections and sepsis. Accordingly, studies on different immunomodulators, including extracorporeal techniques, are crucial to save this category of patients. In this review, we overviewed the different immunomodulation techniques shortly, with a brief review of extracorporeal methods.

Comparative safety and effectiveness of TNF inhibitors, IL6 inhibitors and methotrexate for the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and effectiveness of biologic and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA). METHODS: The retrospective multicentre observational study included patients with a diagnosis of ICI-IA treated with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL6Ri) and/or methotrexate (MTX); patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease were excluded. The primary outcome was time to cancer progression from ICI initiation; the secondary outcome was time to arthritis control from DMARD initiation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare medication groups, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: 147 patients were included (mean age 60.3 (SD 11.9) years, 66 (45%) women). ICI-IA treatment was TNFi in 33 (22%), IL6Ri 42 (29%) and MTX 72 (49%). After adjustment for time from ICI initiation to DMARD initiation, time to cancer progression was significantly shorter for TNFi compared with MTX (HR 3.27 (95% CI 1.21 to 8.84, p=0.019)) while the result for IL6Ri was HR 2.37 (95% CI 0.94 to 5.98, p=0.055). Time to arthritis control was faster for TNFi compared with MTX (HR 1.91 (95% CI 1.06 to 3.45, p=0.032)) while the result for IL6Ri was HR 1.66 (95% CI 0.93 to 2.97, p=0.089). A subset analysis in patients with melanoma gave similar results for both cancer progression and arthritis control. CONCLUSION: The treatment of ICI-IA with a biologic DMARD is associated with more rapid arthritis control than with MTX, but may be associated with a shorter time to cancer progression.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Eosinophilia and Lung Disease in Biologic-Exposed Children With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Although interleukin-1 (IL-1)/IL-6 inhibitors are effective therapies for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), some patients develop eosinophilia and lung disease during treatment. This study was undertaken to retrospectively evaluate incidence and risk factors for eosinophilia and describe lung disease outcomes in IL-1/IL-6 inhibitor-exposed patients with systemic JIA. METHODS: Among JIA patients at our institution exposed to interleukin-1 (IL-1)/IL-6 inhibitors (1995-2022), we compared incidence rate of eosinophilia in systemic JIA compared to other JIA, stratified by medication class (IL-1/IL-6 inhibitors, other cytokine inhibitors, methotrexate). We used Cox models to identify predictors of eosinophilia during IL-1/IL-6 inhibitor use and summarized treatment changes and outcomes after eosinophilia, including lung disease. HLA typing was performed on a clinical or research basis. RESULTS: There were 264 new medication exposures in 75 patients with systemic JIA and 41 patients with other JIA. A total of 49% of patients with systemic JIA with HLA typing (n = 45) were positive for HLA-DRB1*15 alleles. Eosinophilia was common during IL-1/IL-6 inhibitor use and did not differ by systemic JIA compared to other JIA (0.08 and 0.07 per person-year, respectively; P = 0.30). Among systemic JIA patients, pretreatment macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) was associated with a higher rate of subsequent eosinophilia on biologic therapy (unadjusted hazard ratio 3.2 [95% confidence interval 1.2-8.3]). A total of 4 of 5 patients who switched therapy within 10 weeks of eosinophilia experienced disease flare compared to none of the patients who continued the original therapy. A total of 8 of 25 patients with pulmonary evaluations had lung disease, and all had severe manifestations of systemic JIA (MAS, intensive care unit stay). One death was attributed to systemic JIA-lung disease. CONCLUSION: Eosinophilia is common in JIA patients using IL-1/IL-6 inhibitors. Severe disease may be associated with eosinophilia and lung disease in systemic JIA.

Epidural Abscesses as a Complication of Interleukin-6 Inhibitor and Dexamethasone Treatment in a Patient with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Case Report.

A 66-year-old female patient was hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, which led to hypoxia requiring oxygen support with high-flow nasal cannulae. She received anti-inflammatory treatment with a 10-day dexamethasone 6 mg PO course and a single infusion of IL-6 monoclonal antibody tocilizumab 640 mg IV. Treatment led to gradual reduction of oxygen support. However, on Day 10, she was found to have Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with epidural, psoas, and paravertebral abscesses as the source. Targeted history taking revealed a dental procedure for periodontitis 4 weeks prior to hospitalization as the probable source. She received an 11-week antibiotic treatment, which led to resolution of the abscesses. This case report highlights the importance of individual infection risk assessment before the initiation of immunosuppressive treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia.

Perspective for Discovery of Small Molecule IL-6 Inhibitors through Study of Structure-Activity Relationships and Molecular Docking.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a proinflammatory cytokine that plays a key role in the pathogenesis and physiology of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, such as coronary heart disease, cancer, Alzheimer's disease, asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, and most recently COVID-19. IL-6 and its signaling pathway are promising targets in the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Although, anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibodies are currently being used in clinics, huge unmet medical needs remain because of the high cost, administration-related toxicity, lack of opportunity for oral dosing, and potential immunogenicity of monoclonal antibody therapy. Furthermore, nonresponse or loss of response to monoclonal antibody therapy has been reported, which increases the importance of optimizing drug therapy with small molecule drugs. This work aims to provide a perspective for the discovery of novel small molecule IL-6 inhibitors by the analysis of the structure-activity relationships and computational studies for protein-protein inhibitors targeting the IL-6/IL-6 receptor/gp130 complex.

Targeting Olokizumab-Interleukin 6 interaction interface to discover novel IL-6 inhibitors.

The IL-6/IL-6R or IL-6/GP130 protein-protein interactions play a significant role in controlling the development of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, Castleman disease, psoriasis, and, most recently, COVID-19. Modulating or antagonizing protein-protein interactions of IL6 binding to its receptors by oral drugs promises similar efficacy to biological therapy in patients, namely monoclonal antibodies. In this study, we used a crystal structure of the Fab part of olokizumab in a complex with IL-6 (PDB ID: 4CNI) to uncover starting points for small molecule IL-6 antagonist discovery. Firstly, a structure­based pharmacophore model of the protein active site cavity was generated to identify possible candidates, followed by virtual screening with a significant database Drugbank. After the docking protocol validation, a virtual screening by molecular docking was carried out and a total of 11 top hits were reported. Detailed analysis of the best scoring molecules was performed with ADME/T analysis and molecular dynamics simulation. Furthermore, the Molecular Mechanics-Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/GBSA) technique has been utilized to evaluate the free binding energy. Based on the finding, one newly obtained compound in this study, namely DB15187, may serve as a lead compound for the discovery of IL-6 inhibitors.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Local versus Systemic Therapy for Noninfectious Uveitis (NIU).

The mainstay of treatment for noninfectious uveitis (NIU) is immunosuppressant therapy. This may come in a localized form that is administered specifically to the eye or a systemic form that penetrates ocular tissues. Over the last twenty years, both local and systemic treatments have undergone advancements in pharmaceutical development. In this review, we will discuss new therapies and analyze the risks and benefits for all existing NIU therapies. Some of these therapies include topical, intravitreal, periocular, and systemic steroids, as well as systemic antimetabolites, tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, T-cell inhibitors, anti-CD 20 agents, interleukin-6 inhibitors, alkylating agents, and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Tocilizumabe para o tratamento de pacientes adultos com Covid-19 hospitalizados / Tocilizumab for the treatment of hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients

INTRODUÇÃO: O tocilizumabe, um anticorpo monoclonal humanizado recombinante IgG1 dirigido contra o receptor da interleucina-6 (IL-6, citocina pró-inflamatória), pode representar uma estratégia para a redução da duração ou gravidade da infecção causada por SARS-CoV-2 em pacientes hospitalizados devido as suas propriedades imunossupressoras e potencial de controle sobre a disfunção imunitária e a inflamação. PERGUNTA DE PESQUISA: O uso de tocilizumabe é eficaz e seguro no tratamento de pacientes adultos com COVID-19 hospitalizados, quando comparado as opções terapêuticas recomendadas no Brasil? EVIDÊNCIAS CLÍNICAS: Para seleção das evidências clínicas foi conduzida uma revisão sistemática da literatura em busca de ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR) e revisões sistemáticas com meta-análises (RSMA) que avaliassem os efeitos do tocilizumabe como monoterapia ou associado aos cuidados usuais - definidos aqui como 'terapia padrão' (corticoesteróides sistêmicos, anticoagulantes, antimicrobianos/antivirais) n