Rh Blood Group Antigens and Alloimmunization Risk of Pregnant Women in South Western, Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Rh blood group antigens are the second most important blood group antigens in clinical transfusion due to their immunogenicity and prevalence. Childbirth, miscarriage, and other obstetrics events are risk factors for alloimmunization in women which increases the likelihood of haemolytic blood transfusion reaction and hemolytic disease of the fetal/newborn (HDNF/B). Even though there are several data on the RhD status of our populations. However, there is a dearth of data on pregnant women's C, E, c, and e status, their alloimmunization risk, and rates in Nigeria. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to provide information on the distribution of the Rh major antigens and risk factors for alloimmunization in pregnant women in southwestern Nigeria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study of 133 pregnant women attending routine ante-natal clinics. Questionnaires were administered to collect biodata and obstetrics history. ABO blood grouping and Rh phenotyping were carried out on their blood samples using RAPID LABS Monoclonal Rhesus Typing Reagent. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Rh blood group antigen c was present in 100% of the women, followed by e (98.5%) and D (95.5%). C and E are the least prevalent antigens and probably the ones to which antibodies may be formed. The commonest Rh phenotype was Dce. Of all the pregnant women, alloimmunization was present in 0.8%. Of those who were RhD negative, alloimmunization was present in 16.7%. Pregnant women are more likely to be alloimmunized against C and E antigens than c and e antigens due to their low and high frequencies respectively.

CONTEXTE: Les antigènes du groupe sanguin Rh sont les seconds plus importants en transfusion clinique en raison de leur immunogénicité et de leur prévalence. L'accouchement, la fausse couche et d'autres événements obstétriques sont des facteurs de risque d'alloimmunisation chez les femmes, augmentant ainsi la probabilité de réactions hémolytiques lors de transfusions sanguines et de maladies hémolytiques du fœtus/nouveau-né (HDNF/B). Bien qu'il existe plusieurs données sur le statut RhD de nos populations, il y a un manque de données sur le statut des antigènes C, E, c et e chez les femmes enceintes, leur risque d'alloimmunisation et les taux associés au Nigéria. OBJECTIFS: Cette étude vise à fournir des informations sur la distribution des principaux antigènes Rh et les facteurs de risque d'alloimmunisation chez les femmes enceintes dans le sud-ouest du Nigéria. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Il s'agit d'une étude descriptive transversale de 133 femmes enceintes fréquentant les cliniques prénatales de routine. Des questionnaires ont été administrés pour collecter des données biodémographiques et des antécédents obstétriques. La détermination des groupes sanguins ABO et le phénotypage Rh ont été réalisés sur leurs échantillons de sang à l'aide du réactif de typage Rh monoclonal RAPID LABS. RÉSULTATS ET DISCUSSION: L'antigène c du groupe sanguin Rh était présent chez 100 % des femmes, suivi de e (98,5 %) et D (95,5 %). Les antigènes C et E sont les moins prévalents et probablement ceux contre lesquels des anticorps peuvent être formés. Le phénotype Rh le plus courant était Dce. Parmi toutes les femmes enceintes, l'alloimmunisation était présente chez 0,8 %. Parmi celles qui étaient RhD négatives, 'alloimmunisation était présente chez 16,7 %. Les femmes enceintes sont plus susceptibles de développer une alloimmunisation contre les antigènes C et E que contre les antigènes c et e en raison de leurs fréquences respectives faibles et élevées. MOTS-CLÉS: Antigènes du groupe sanguin Rh, Phénotype, Alloanticorps érythrocytaires, Femmes enceintes.

Neonatal and Obstetrical Outcomes of Pregnancies Complicated by Alloimmunization.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite advances in the prevention of rhesus (Rh)(D) alloimmunization, alloantibodies to Rh(D) and non-Rh(D) red blood cell antigens continue to be detected in ∼4% of US pregnancies and can result in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Recent reports on HDFN lack granularity and are unable to provide antibody-specific outcomes. The objective of this study was to calculate the frequency of alloimmunization in our large hospital system and summarize the outcomes based on antibody specificity, titer, and other clinical factors. METHODS: We identified all births in a 6-year period after a positive red blood cell antibody screen result during pregnancy and summarized their characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 707 neonates were born after a positive maternal antibody screen result (3.0/1000 live births). In 31 (4%), the positive screen result was due to rhesus immune globulin alone. Of the 676 neonates exposed to alloantibodies, the direct antibody test (DAT) result was positive, showing antigen-positivity and evidence of HDFN in 37% of those tested. Neonatal disease was most severe with DAT-positive anti-Rh antibodies (c, C, D, e, E). All neonatal red blood cell transfusions (15) and exchange transfusions (6) were due to anti-Rh alloimmunization. No neonates born to mothers with anti-M, anti-S, anti-Duffy, anti-Kidd A, or anti-Lewis required NICU admission for hyperbilirubinemia or transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Alloimmunization to Rh-group antibodies continues to cause a majority of the severe HDFN cases in our hospital system. In neonates born to alloimmunized mothers, a positive DAT result revealing antigen-positivity is the best predictor of anemia and hyperbilirubinemia.

Disease severity in subsequent pregnancies with RhD immunization: A nationwide cohort.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the severity of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn (HDFN) in subsequent pregnancies with RhD immunization and to identify predictive factors for severe disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nationwide prospective cohort study, including all pregnant women with RhD antibodies. All women with at least two pregnancies with RhD antibodies and RhD-positive foetuses were selected. The main outcome measure was the severity of HDFN in the first and subsequent pregnancy at risk. A subgroup analysis was performed for the group of women where RhD antibodies developed after giving birth to an RhD-positive child and thus after receiving anti-D at least twice (group A) or during the first pregnancy at risk for immunization (group B). RESULTS: Sixty-two RhD immunized women with a total of 150 RhD-positive children were included. The severity of HDFN increased for the whole group significantly in the subsequent pregnancy (p < 0.001), although it remained equal or even decreased in 44% of women. When antibodies were already detected at first trimester screening in the first immunized pregnancy, after giving birth to an RhD-positive child (group A), severe HDFN in the next pregnancy was uncommon (22%). Especially when no therapy or only non-intensive phototherapy was indicated during the first immunized pregnancy (6%) or if the antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity result remained <10%. Contrarily, women with a negative first trimester screening and RhD antibodies detected later during the first pregnancy of an RhD-positive child (group B), often before they had ever received anti-D prophylaxis, were most prone for severe disease in a subsequent pregnancy (48%). CONCLUSION: RhD-mediated HDFN in a subsequent pregnancy is generally more severe than in the first pregnancy at risk and can be estimated using moment of antibody detection and severity in the first immunized pregnancy. Women developing antibodies in their first pregnancy of an RhD-positive child are at highest risk of severe disease in the next pregnancy.

Estimating the cost of Rh testing and prophylaxis in early pregnancy: A time-driven activity-based costing study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost of Rhesus (Rh) testing and prophylaxis for first-trimester vaginal bleeding in the ambulatory setting. STUDY DESIGN: We used time-driven, activity-based costing to analyze tasks associated with Rh testing and prophylaxis of first-trimester vaginal bleeding at one hospital-based outpatient and two independent reproductive health clinics. At each site, we observed 10 patients undergoing Rh-typing and two patients undergoing Rh prophylaxis. We computed the costs of blood Rh-typing by both fingerstick and phlebotomy, cost of locating previous blood type in the electronic health record (available for 69.8% of hospital-based patients), and costs associated with Rh immune globulin prophylaxis. All costs are reported in 2021 US dollars. RESULTS: The hospital-based clinic reviewed the electronic health record to confirm Rh-status (cost, $26.18 per patient) and performed a phlebotomy, at $47.11 per patient, if none was recorded. The independent clinics typed blood by fingerstick, at a per-patient cost of $4.07. Rh-immune globulin administration costs, including the medication, were similar across facilities, at a mean of $145.66 per patient. Projected yearly costs for testing and prophylaxis were $55,831 for the hospital-based clinic, which was the lowest-volume site, $47,941 for Clinic A, which saw 150 patients/month, and $185,654 for Clinic B, which saw 600 patients/month. CONCLUSIONS: Rh testing and prophylaxis for first-trimester vaginal bleeding generates considerable costs for outpatient facilities, even for Rh-positive patients with a prior blood type on record. IMPLICATIONS: Rh testing and prophylaxis for first-trimester bleeding generate considerable costs even for Rh-positive patients and those with a previously known blood type. These findings highlight the need to reconsider this practice, which is no longer supported by evidence and already safely waived in multiple medical settings in the United States and around the world.

Receipt of RhD-positive whole blood for life-threatening bleeding in female children: A survey in alloimmunized mothers regarding minimum acceptable survival benefit relative to risk of maternal alloimmunization to anti-D.

BACKGROUND: Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) for treatment of hemorrhagic shock sometimes necessitates transfusion of RhD-positive units due to short supply of RhD-negative LTOWB. Practitioners must choose between using RhD-positive LTOWB when RhD-negative is unavailable against the risk to a female of childbearing potential of becoming RhD-alloimmunized, risking hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) in future children, or using component therapy with RhD-negative red cells. This survey asked females with a history of red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization about their risk tolerance of RhD alloimmunization compared to the potential for improved survival following transfusion of RhD-positive blood for an injured RhD negative female child. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A survey was administered to RBC alloimmunized mothers. Respondents were eligible if they were living in the United States with at least one red cell antibody known to cause HDFN and if they had at least one RBC alloimmunized pregnancy. RESULTS: Responses from 107 RBC alloimmmunized females were analyzed. There were 32/107 (30%) with a history of severe HDFN; 12/107 (11%) had a history of fetal or neonatal loss due to HDFN. The median (interquartile range) absolute improvement in survival at which the respondents would accept RhD-positive transfusions for a female child was 4% (1%-14%). This was not different between females with and without a history of severe or fatal HDFN (p = .08 and 0.38, respectively). CONCLUSION: Alloimmunized mothers would accept the risk of D-alloimmunization in a RhD-negative female child for improved survival in cases of life-threatening bleeding.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of severe maternal alloimmunization: individual patient data meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the outcomes associated with the administration of maternal intravenous immunoglobulin in high-risk red blood cell-alloimmunized pregnancies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched until June 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This review included studies reporting on pregnancies with severe red blood cell alloimmunization, defined as either a previous fetal or neonatal death or the need for intrauterine transfusion before 24 weeks of gestation in the previous pregnancy as a result of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. METHODS: Cases were pregnancies that received intravenous immunoglobulin, whereas controls did not. Individual patient data meta-analysis was performed using the Bayesian framework. RESULTS: Individual patient data analysis included 8 studies consisting of 97 cases and 97 controls. Intravenous immunoglobulin was associated with prolonged delta gestational age at the first intrauterine transfusion (gestational age of current pregnancy - gestational age at previous pregnancy) (mean difference, 3.19 weeks; 95% credible interval, 1.28-5.05), prolonged gestational age at the first intrauterine transfusion (mean difference, 1.32 weeks; 95% credible interval, 0.08-2.50), reduced risk of fetal hydrops at the time of first intrauterine transfusion (incidence rate ratio, 0.19; 95% credible interval, 0.07-0.45), reduced risk of fetal demise (incidence rate ratio, 0.23; 95% credible interval, 0.10-0.47), higher chances of live birth at ≥28 weeks (incidence rate ratio, 1.88; 95% credible interval, 1.31-2.69;), higher chances of live birth at ≥32 weeks (incidence rate ratio, 1.93; 95% credible interval, 1.32-2.83), and higher chances of survival at birth (incidence rate ratio, 1.82; 95% credible interval, 1.30-2.61). There was no substantial difference in the number of intrauterine transfusions, hemoglobin level at birth, bilirubin level at birth, or survival at hospital discharge for live births. CONCLUSION: Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in pregnancies at risk of severe early hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn seems to have a clinically relevant beneficial effect on the course and severity of the disease.

Neurosonographic Findings in Infants with Rhesus Hemolytic Disease of Newborn: A Prospective Observational Study.

We estimated the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and/or periventricular leukomalacia/echogenicity (PVL/E) in Rhesus isoimmunized infants. Seventy-one infants underwent cranial ultrasound within the first 3 days of life or discharge, whichever was earlier. Of these, 27 (38%) infants had IVH/ PVL/E. On multivariate analysis, lower gestational age (P = 0.035), small for gestational age [aOR (95% CI) 10.6 (1.9, 58.9)], and sepsis [aOR (95% CI) 4.5 (1.1, 18.4)] were independently associated with IVH/PVL.

Guideline No. 448: Prevention of Rh D Alloimmunization.

OBJECTIVE: This guideline provides recommendations for the prevention of Rh D alloimmunization (isoimmunization) in pregnancy, including parental testing, routine postpartum and antepartum prophylaxis, and other clinical indications for prophylaxis. Prevention of red cell alloimmunization in pregnancy with atypical antigens (other than the D antigen), for which immunoprophylaxis is not currently available, is not addressed in this guideline. TARGET POPULATION: All Rh D-negative pregnant individuals at risk for Rh D alloimmunization due to potential exposure to a paternally derived fetal Rh D antigen. OUTCOMES: Routine postpartum and antepartum Rh D immunoprophylaxis reduces the risk of Rh D alloimmunization at 6 months postpartum and in a subsequent pregnancy. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This guideline details the population of pregnant individuals who may benefit from Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIG) immunoprophylaxis. Thus, those for whom the intervention is not required may avoid adverse effects, while those who are at risk of alloimmunization may mitigate this risk for themselves and/or their fetus. EVIDENCE: For recommendations regarding use of RhIG, Medline and Medline in Process via Ovid and Embase Classic + Embase via Ovid were searched using both the trials and observational studies search strategies with study design filters. For trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects via Ovid were also searched. All databases were searched from January 2000 to November 26, 2019. Studies published before 2000 were captured from the grey literature of national obstetrics and gynaecology specialty societies, luminary specialty journals, and bibliographic searching. A formal process for the systematic review was undertaken for this update, as described in the systematic review manuscript published separately. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the SOGC's modified GRADE approach. See Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: The intended users of this guideline include prenatal care providers such as obstetricians, midwives, family physicians, emergency room physicians, and residents, as well as registered nurses and nurse practitioners. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: An updated Canadian guideline for prevention of Rh D alloimmunization addresses D variants, cffDNA for fetal Rh type, and updates recommendations on timing of RhIG administration. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Rh immune globulin immunoprophylaxis after RhD-positive red cell exposure in RhD-negative patients via transfusion: A survey of practices.

BACKGROUND: Current Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB) standards require transfusion services to have a policy on Rh immune globulin (RhIG) immunoprophylaxis for when RhD-negative patients are exposed to RhD-positive red cells. This is a survey of AABB-accredited transfusion services in the United States (US) regarding institutional policies and practices on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD-negative patients receive RhD-positive (i.e., RhD-incompatible) packed red blood cell (pRBC) and platelet transfusions. RESULTS: Approximately half of the respondents (50.4%, 116/230) have policies on RhIG administration after RhD-incompatible pRBC and platelet transfusions, while others had policies for only pRBC (13.5%, 31/230) or only platelet (17.8%, 41/230) transfusions, but not both. In contrast, 18.3% (42/230) report that their institution has no written policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD-incompatible transfusions. Most institutions (70.2%, 99/141) do not have policies addressing safety parameters to mitigate the risk of hemolysis associated with the high dose of RhIG required to prevent RhD alloimmunization after RhD-incompatible pRBC transfusions. DISCUSSION: With approximately half of US AABB-accredited institutions report having policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after both RhD-incompatible pRBC and platelet transfusions, some institutions may not be in compliance with AABB standards. Further, most with policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD-incompatible pRBC transfusion do not have written safeguards to mitigate the risk of hemolysis associated with the high dose of RhIG required. CONCLUSION: This survey underscores the diverse and inadequate institutional policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD exposure in Rh-negative patients via transfusion. This observation identifies an opportunity to improve transfusion safety.

An ongoing problem: Rhesus hemolytic disease of the newborn - A decade of experience in a single centre.

BACKGROUND: The objectives were to evaluate the descriptive features of newborns with a diagnosis of Rhesus (Rh) hemolytic disease, to determine the morbidity and mortality rates, to evaluate the treatment methods and the factors affecting treatment requirements and clinical outcomes during a ten-year period at a tertiary center. METHODS: Newborn infants who had a positive direct Coombs test and/or had a history of intrauterine transfusion (IUT) due to Rh hemolytic disease were included. The data regarding the prenatal, natal and postnatal periods were collected from hospital records. RESULTS: A total of 260 neonates were included of which 51.2% were female. The mean ± standard deviation gestational age was 36.9 ± 2.7 weeks. The rate of preterm birth was 41.2%. Of 257 mothers whose obstetric medical history could be accessed, 87.2% were multigravida, whereas 76.3% were multiparous. Among mothers who had a reliable history of anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis (n=191), 51.3% had not received anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis in their previous pregnancies. The antenatal transfusion rate was 31.7% and the frequency of hydrops fetalis was 8.8%. While combined exchange transfusion (ET) and phototherapy (PT) was performed in 15.4% of the babies, the majority either needed phototherapy only (51.1%) or no treatment (33.5%). The mortality rate was 3.8 % (n = 10), and nine babies out of these 10 were those with severe hydrops fetalis. CONCLUSION: This study showed that Rh hemolytic disease is still a major problem in developing countries. Multiple comorbidities may occur in addition to life threatening complications, including hydrops fetalis, anemia and severe hyperbilirubinemia. High rates of multiparity and low rates of anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis are potential barriers for the eradication of the disease. It should be remembered that Rh hemolytic disease is a preventable disease in the presence of appropriate antenatal follow-up and care facilities.

Guide to Rho(D) Immune Globulin in Women With Molecularly Defined Asian-type DEL (c.1227G>A).

Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn is a potential risk for D-negative mothers who produce anti-D during pregnancy, which can lead to morbidity and mortality in subsequent pregnancies. To prevent this hemolytic disease, Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIG) is generally administered to D-negative mothers without anti-D at 28 weeks of gestation and shortly after delivery. However, current guidelines suggest that pregnant mothers with molecularly defined weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, and 4.1 do not need RhIG as they are unlikely to produce alloanti-D when exposed to fetuses with D-positive red cells. This issue and the necessity of RHD genotyping have been extensively discussed in Western countries, where these variants are relatively common. Recent evidence indicates that women with Asian-type DEL (c.1227G>A) also do not form alloanti-D when exposed to D-positive red cells. We report that mothers with molecularly defined Asian-type DEL, similar to those with weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, and 4.1, do not require RhIG before and after delivery. Collectively, this review could pave the way for the revision of international guidelines to include the selective use of RhIG based on specific genotypes, particularly in women with the Asian-type DEL.

[Prevention of Rh D alloimmunization in the first trimester of the pregnancy: French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines for clinical practice]. / Prévention de l'allo-immunisation anti-RH1 au premier trimestre de la grossesse : recommandations pour la pratique clinique du Collège national des gynécologues-obstétriciens français.

OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations for the prevention of Rh D alloimmunization in the first trimester of pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The quality of evidence of the literature was assessed following the GRADE methodology with questions formulated in the PICO format (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and outcomes defined a priori and classified according to their importance. An extensive bibliographic search was performed on Pubmed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of evidence was assessed (high, moderate, low, very low) and a recommendation was formulated: (i) strong, (ii) weak, or (iii) no recommendation. The recommendations were reviewed in two rounds with reviewers from the scientific board of the French College of the OB/GYN (Delphi survey) to select the consensus recommendations. RESULTS: The three recommendations from PICO questions reached agreement using the Delphi method. It is recommended not to administer Rh D immunoglobulin before 12 weeks of gestation to reduce the risk of alloimmunization in case of abortion or miscarriage, in RhD negative patients when the genitor is RhD positive or unknown (Weak recommendation. Very low-quality evidence). It is recommended not to administer Rh D immunoglobulin before 12 weeks of gestation to reduce the risk of alloimmunization in cases of bleeding in an ongoing intrauterine pregnancy (Weak recommendation. Very low-quality evidence). The literature data are insufficient in quality and quantity to determine if the injection of Rh D immunoglobulin reduces the risk of alloimmunization in the case of an ectopic pregnancy (No recommendation. Very low-quality evidence). CONCLUSION: Even though the quality of evidence from the studies is very low, it is recommended not to administer Rh D immunoglobulin in case of abortion, miscarriage or bleeding before 12 weeks of amenorrhea. The quality of evidence was too low to issue a recommendation regarding ectopic pregnancy.

Low titer group O whole blood and risk of RhD alloimmunization: Rationale for use in Finland.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) used for patients with life-threatening hemorrhage is often RhD positive. The most important complication following RhD alloimmunization is hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Preceding clinical use of RhD positive LTOWB, we estimated the risk of HDFN due to LTOWB prehospital transfusion in the Finnish population. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We collected data on prehospital transfusions in Tampere and Helsinki University Hospital areas. Using the mean of reported alloimmunization rates in trauma studies (24%) and a higher reported rate representing trauma patients of 13-50 years old (42.7%), we estimated the risk of HDFN and extrapolated it to the whole of Finland. RESULTS: We estimated that in Finland, with the current prehospital transfusion rate we would see 1-3 cases of severe HDFN due to prehospital LTOWB transfusions every 10 years, and fetal death due to HDFN caused by LTOWB transfusion less than once in 100 years. DISCUSSION: The estimated risk of serious HDFN due to prehospital LTOWB transfusion in the Finnish population is similar to previous estimates. As Finland routinely screens expectant mothers for red blood cell antibodies and as the contemporary treatment of HDFN is very effective, we support the prehospital use of RhD positive LTOWB in all patient groups.