Efficacy and safety of tenapanor in end-stage renal disease patients with hyperphosphatemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphatemia occurs universally in end-stage renal disease(ESRD), and the attainment of target serum phosphate levels remains suboptimal with currently available phosphate binders. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenapanor in end-stage renal disease patients with hyperphosphatemia. METHODS: Data sources included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. This meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials evaluating both the efficacy of tenapanor in reducing serum phosphate levels and its safety profile. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs. The GRADE system was used to assess the overall certainty of evidence. A meta-analysis was carried out by using fixed effects (I2 values < 50%) or random effects (I2 values ≥ 50%) models to calculate MD with 95% CI for continuous outcome variables and RR with 95% CI for dichotomous variables. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots. RESULTS: A total of seven RCTs involving 877 individuals were included. The pooling analysis demonstrates that the reduction in mean serum phosphorus levels in the tenapanor group was significantly greater than that in the placebo group [MD= -1.06 mg/dl, 95% CI (-1.59, -0.53); I2 = 83%, p < 0.0001]. The proportion of patients achieving a serum phosphorus level of < 5.5 mg/dL, along with the incidence of any adverse events (AEs) and gastrointestinal disorders, was higher in the tenapanor group compared to the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Tenapanor has the potential to significantly reduce serum phosphorus levels and enhance the rate of achieving target levels compared to placebo, all while maintaining an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42024544531.

The clinical efficacy of combined ESA and Roxadustat treatment for renal anemia in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism: A case series.

RATIONALE: Pharmacological mechanism of Roxadustat in the treatment of renal anemia. PATIENT CONCERNS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of combined Roxadustat and erythropoiesis stimulator (ESA) treatment of renal anemia in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. DIAGNOSES: A retrospective analysis was conducted on hemodialysis patients with renal anemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism treated with ESAs alone, who were admitted to our hospital from March 2022 to December 2022. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were treated with Roxadustat combined with ESAs for 3 months, during which oral iron supplementation was given, and the changes in Hb levels and laboratory-related indicators before and after the combined treatment were analyzed. OUTCOMES: The results showed that a total of 13 patients received combination therapy, with a significant increase in Hb compared to ESAs alone (t = -3.955, P = .002). The Hb qualification rate was 38.46%, and the ∆Hb response rate was 76.92%. The parathyroid hormone significantly decreased with a statistically significant difference (Z = -2.062b, P = .039). Hemoglobin (RBC), total iron binding capacity, and serum ferritin (male) were significantly increased compared to ESAs alone. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein were significantly lower than ESAs alone. The differences in the changes in the above indicators were statistically significant (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in changes in other laboratory-related indicators (P > .05). No adverse reactions were observed during the combined treatment of 13 patients. LESSONS SUBSECTIONS: The combination of Roxadustat and ESAs can effectively improve renal anemia in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism, as well as improve indicators of hyperparathyroidism and blood lipid levels with high levels of safety. This combined treatment thus provides a new and safe treatment method for these patients.

A real-world analysis of roxadustat effectiveness and safety in managing renal anemia among patients on maintenance hemodialysis: An observational study.

We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of roxadustat with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, particularly erythropoietin (EPO), in the treatment of maintenance hemodialysis patients with renal anemia. A prospective cohort study was carried out at the Nephrology Department of the Nantong First People's Hospital and Nantong University Affiliated Hospital from December 2020 to December 2021. We compared hemoglobin (Hb) levels, serum ferritin (SF) levels, and adverse cardiovascular events between the roxadustat and EPO groups at 1, 3, and 6 months into the treatment. A total of 209 patients participated in the study, with 112 in the roxadustat group and 97 in the EPO group. At baseline, no statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, weight, dialysis modality and duration, previous EPO dosage, Hb levels, SF levels, transferrin saturation, heart function classification, and blood pressure levels (P > .05). After 1 month, Hb levels in the roxadustat group were significantly higher than those in the EPO group (P < .05). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups at 3 and 6 months (P > .05). Additionally, there were no significant differences in SF levels and the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events between the 2 groups after treatment (P > .05). Roxadustat was superior to EPO in the initial treatment phase, while its cardiovascular safety was comparable to that of EPO.

Comparative Analysis of Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl-Hydroxylase Inhibitors in Kidney Transplant Recipients Versus Nontransplant Individuals: A Single-Center Study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHis), a novel agent for management of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD), between transplant recipients and nontransplant individuals. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on nondialysis-dependent CKD stage 3 to 5 patients treated with the HIF-PHi roxadustat or daprodustat at a single institution. Patients were categorized as kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and non-KTRs. Efficacy outcomes (hemoglobin and creatinine levels) and safety profiles (rate of adverse events [AEs], descriptions, and discontinuations due to AEs) were assessed 3 months before and 6 months after HIF-PHi initiation within and then between the groups. RESULTS: The study comprised 82 patients (KTR: 43, non-KTR: 39). Median ages significantly differed between the KTR (52.7 years) and non-KTR (82.9 years) groups (P < .001). Roxadustat was predominantly used in the KTR group (88.4%), while daprodustat was used in the non-KTR group (94.9%, P < .001). Both groups exhibited significant increases in Hb levels at 1, 3, and 6 months post-HIF-PHi initiation (P for trend, <.001), with a relative increase in Hb level at 6 months of 16% for KTRs and 13% for non-KTRs. Creatinine levels showed no significant changes over 6 months. Although no difference was observed in drug discontinuation due to AEs, the KTR group experienced a significantly higher rate of thrombotic events (18.6 vs 2.6%, P = .049). CONCLUSIONS: HIF-PHis demonstrate comparable efficacy for managing anemia in CKD, regardless of transplant status. However, heightened vigilance for thrombosis events is necessary during follow-up for KTRs.

Tolerability of the niraparib individualized starting dose in the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy.

PURPOSE: To explore safety and tolerability parameters for the niraparib individualized starting dose (ISD) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to platinum-based chemotherapy who participated in the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial (NCT02655016). METHODS: The PRIMA protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD based on baseline body weight/platelet count. In this ad hoc analysis, the timing, duration, and resolution of the first occurrence of common any-grade hematologic (thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia) and nonhematologic (nausea, asthenia/fatigue, constipation, insomnia, hypertension) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated by treatment arm in the ISD safety population (data cutoff, November 17, 2021; median follow-up, 3.5 years). RESULTS: Of 733 randomized patients, 255 were enrolled after the ISD protocol amendment and received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment (niraparib, 169; placebo, 86). In the niraparib arm, median times to first events were 22.0-35.0 days for hematologic TEAEs and 7.0-56.0 days for nonhematologic TEAEs. First events resolved in ≥ 89.8% of patients for hematologic TEAEs; for nonhematologic TEAEs, resolution rates ranged from 55.3% (insomnia) to 86.0% (nausea). Median durations of first hematologic TEAEs were ≤ 16.0 days, but for first nonhematologic TEAEs ranged from 18.0 days (nausea) to 134.0 days (insomnia). CONCLUSION: The niraparib ISD was generally well tolerated and TEAEs were manageable. Common hematologic and nonhematologic TEAEs occurred early and first events of hematologic TEAEs had a short duration (≈ 2 weeks) and a high resolution rate. These findings support close monitoring immediately following niraparib initiation and may help inform patient expectations for niraparib safety.

Safety and efficacy of ripasudil eye drops in preterm infants with retinopathy of prematurity: phase 1/2, open label, single-arm trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of ripasudil for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). STUDY DESIGN: Phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, 12-week clinical trial. METHODS: Infants born with gestational age (GA) of ≤ 32 weeks or weight of ≤ 1500 g with zone I or II, ≥ stage 1, ROP in both eyes were enrolled. Ripasudil eye drops were administered to patients in both eyes. Phase 1 was a dose-escalation study (once daily for 1 week, then twice daily for 2 weeks); an additional dosing up to 9 weeks was allowed if no safety issues occurred. In phase 2, ripasudil was administered twice daily for up to 12 weeks. Adverse events were assessed. The proportion of patients with type 1 ROP progression, number of days for type 1 ROP progression, and progression to the most advanced ROP stage were estimated. RESULTS: Twenty-four infants were enrolled (phase 1, n = 3; phase 2, n = 21). Nineteen and four patients experienced systemic and ocular adverse events, respectively. Efficacy endpoints were not different between the ripasudil and historical control groups. However, in the GA ≤ 27 weeks subgroup, fewer patients progressed to type 1 ROP in the ripasudil than in the historical control group (P = 0.09). In the GA ≤ 27 weeks subgroups, the 25th percentile for the number of days for type 1 ROP progression was 22 days in the historical control group and 44 days in the ripasudil group. CONCLUSION: Ripasudil was safe and inhibited/delayed type 1 ROP progression, especially in infants with short GA.

A preliminary study of roxadustat in the treatment of aplastic anemia patients with inadequate erythroid responses.

Some aplastic anemia(AA) patients only have partial hematological responses after immunosuppressive therapy. Failure to achieve complete normalization of blood counts, particularly hemoglobin, will reduce their quality of life. This open-label pilot study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in this setting. A total of 14 patients with AA who had inadequate erythroid response after immunosuppressive therapy were included in the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was hemoglobin response at week 8 after roxadustat treatment. The median duration of roxadustat therapy was 14 (4-30) weeks, with 12 patients receiving roxadustat for ≥ 8 weeks. At week 8, nine patients (9/14, 64.3%) had their hemoglobin rising for at least 15 g/L, with two patients (2/14, 14.3%) achieving normal hemoglobin levels. By the last follow-up, hemoglobin responses were observed in 10 patients (10/14, 71.4%), with 4 patients(4/14, 28.6%) having normal hemoglobin levels. Roxadustat was tapered or discontinued in four responded patients; one relapsed after 12 weeks of tapering, and three maintained their response. Four patients (4/14, 28.6%) experienced mild adverse effects during therapy. Roxadustat is safe and well tolerated by patients with AA. Treatment with the hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor improves hemoglobin levels in AA patients with inadequate erythroid responses.

[Efficacy and safety of roxadustat in the treatment of refractory non-severe aplastic anemia].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in patients with refractory non-severe aplastic anemia (NSAA) . Methods: The clinical data of patients with refractory NSAA who had been treated with roxadustat continuously for at least 3 months and followed up for more than 6 months at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from October 2020 to August 2022 were retrospectively collected. The demographic information, clinical data, treatment efficacy, adverse reactions, and outcomes were evaluated, and the factors influencing efficacy were analyzed. Results: A total of 41 patients were included. The male-to-female ratio was 16∶25, and the median age was 52 (18-84) years. The median duration of roxadustat treatment was 5 (3-20) months, and the median follow-up was 15 (6-26) months. Hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) was 12.2%, 29.3%, 46.3%, 43.9%, and 30.3% at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The rate of transfusion independence was 28.5%, 38.1%, and 33.3% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Hemoglobin returned to normal in some patients after treatment with roxadustat. The incidence of adverse events was 22%, all of which were grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ and recoverable. No factors that could affect HI-E were identified. By the end of follow-up, 45% of the patients relapsed, with a median time to relapse of 7 (3-12) months. No clonal evolution was observed, and one patient died. Conclusion: Roxadustat effectively improved anemia with good tolerance in patients with refractory NSAA.

A retrospective study on the efficacy of Roxadustat in peritoneal dialysis patients with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Roxadustat, an oral medication for treating renal anemia, is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor used for regulating iron metabolism and promoting erythropoiesis. To investigate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective study, 81 PD patients (with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness) were divided into the roxadustat group (n = 61) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) group (n = 20). Hemoglobin (Hb), total cholesterol, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), related indicators of cardiac function and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were collected. Additionally, adverse events were also recorded. The follow-up period was 16 weeks. RESULTS: The two groups exhibited similar baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. At baseline, the roxadustat group had a mean Hb level of 89.8 ± 18.9 g/L, while the ESAs group had a mean Hb level of 95.2 ± 16.0 g/L. By week 16, the Hb levels had increased to 118 ± 19.8 g/L (p < 0.05) in the roxadustat group and 101 ± 19.3 g/L (p > 0.05) in the ESAs group. The efficacy of roxadustat in improving anemia was not influenced by baseline levels of hs-CRP and iPTH. Cholesterol was decreased in the roxadustat group without statin use. An increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and stabilization of BNP were observed in the roxadustat group. CONCLUSION: For PD patients with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness, roxadustat can significantly improve renal anemia. The efficacy of roxadustat in improving renal anemia was not affected by baseline levels of hs-CRP0 and iPTH.

The Role of CYPs and Transporters in the Biotransformation and Transport of the Anti-hepatitis C Antiviral Agents Asunaprevir, Daclatasvir, and Beclabuvir: Impact of Liver Disease, Race and Drug-drug Interactions on Safety and Efficacy.

Asunaprevir, daclatasvir, and beclabuvir are direct-acting antiviral agents used in the treatment of patients infected with hepatitis C genotype 1b. This article reviews the biotransformation and disposition of these drugs in relation to the safety and efficacy of therapy. CYP3A4 and 3A5 catalyze the oxidative biotransformation of the drugs, while P-glycoprotein mediates their efflux from tissues. Asunaprevir is also a substrate for the influx transporters OATP1B1 and OATP2B1 and the efflux transporter MRP2, while beclabuvir is also a substrate for the efflux transporter BCRP. Liver disease decreases the expression of CYPs and transporters that mediate drug metabolism and disposition. Serum asunaprevir concentrations, but not those of daclatasvir or beclabuvir, are increased in patients with severe liver disease, which may produce toxicity. Pharmacogenomic variation in CYPs and transporters also has the potential to disrupt therapy with asunaprevir, daclatasvir and beclabuvir; some variants are more prevalent in certain racial groups. Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions, especially where asunaprevir, daclatasvir, and beclabuvir are victim drugs, are mediated by coadministered rifampicin, ketoconazole and ritonavir, and are attributable to inhibition and/or induction of CYPs and transporters. Conversely, there is also evidence that asunaprevir, daclatasvir and beclabuvir are perpetrators of drug interactions with coadministered rosuvastatin and dextromethorphan. Together, liver disease, pharmacogenomic variation and drug-drug interactions may disrupt therapy with asunaprevir, daclatasvir and beclabuvir due to the impaired function of important CYPs and transporters.