Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: A multicenter analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Multicenter retrospective analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors (i.e. 3 points for the 'E' domain of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score) was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative, functional, pathological and oncological data were analyzed and compared with those of patients with exophytic and mesophytic masses (i.e. 1 and 2 points for the 'E' domain, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess variables for trifecta achievement (negative margin, no postoperative complications, and 90% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] recovery). RESULTS: Overall, 147 patients were included in the study group. Patients with a completely endophytic mass had bigger tumors (mean 4.2 vs. 4.1 vs. 3.2 cm; p < 0.001) on preoperative imaging and higher overall R.E.N.A.L. score. There was no difference in mean operative time. Estimated blood loss was higher in the endophytic group (mean 177.75 vs. 185.5 vs. 130 ml; p = 0.001). Warm ischemia time was shorter for the exophytic group (median 16 vs. 21 vs. 22 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in patients with endophytic tumor (24.8% vs. 19.5% vs. 14.8%; p < 0.001). Six (4.5%) patients had positive surgical margins, there was no difference between groups. Trifecta was achieved in 44 patients in endophytic group (45.4 vs. 68.8 and 50.9%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis for trifecta revealed that clinical tumor size (odds ratio: 0.667, 95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.79, p < 0.001) was only significant predictor for trifecta achievement. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that RAPN in case of completely endophytic renal masses can be performed with acceptable outcomes in centers with significant robotic expertise.

Clips Can be Safely Used for Vascular Control of the Renal Vessels During Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To review our experience using clips to control the renal vessels during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and determine the safety of this practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent LDN at our centre January 1, 2007-September 17, 2019. The primary outcome was the rate of complication associated with vascular control of the renal vessels, which included (1) conversion to open to manage bleeding, (2) additional procedures for bleeding, and (3) major bleeding requiring blood transfusion. Secondary outcomes included the rate of renal artery/vein clip dislodgement or crossing, change in hemoglobin, warm ischemia time and the incidence of intra-operative complications and postoperative in-hospital complications. RESULTS: We included 503 patients who underwent LDN, of which 497 were left sided. The main renal artery was controlled with 3 titanium clips in 489 (97%) cases. The main renal vein was controlled with 2 polymer-locking clips in 478 (95%) cases. For our primary outcome, there were no conversions to open to manage bleeding, no secondary procedures due to bleeding and no major bleeding requiring blood transfusion. Additionally, there were no donor deaths. Regarding our secondary outcomes, there were 5 intraoperative events related to the titanium clips being placed on the renal artery and 1 intraoperative event related to the polymer-locking clips on the renal vein, none of which resulted in any morbidity. CONCLUSION: Using 3 titanium clips on the renal artery and 2 polymer-locking clips on the renal vein during left LDN is safe and provides excellent vascular control.

Predictors and one-year outcomes of patients with delayed graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function (DGF) is closely associated with the use of marginal donated kidneys due to deficits during transplantation and in recipients. We aimed to predict the incidence of DGF and evaluate its effect on graft survival. METHODS: This retrospective study on kidney transplantation was conducted from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. We classified recipients whose operations were performed in different years into training and validation cohorts and used data from the training cohort to analyze predictors of DGF. A nomogram was then constructed to predict the likelihood of DGF based on these predictors. RESULTS: The incidence rate of DGF was 16.92%. Binary logistic regression analysis showed correlations between the incidence of DGF and cold ischemic time (CIT), warm ischemic time (WIT), terminal serum creatine (Scr) concentration, duration of pretransplant dialysis, primary cause of donor death, and usage of LifePort. The internal accuracy of the nomogram was 83.12%. One-year graft survival rates were 93.59 and 99.74%, respectively, for the groups with and without DGF (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The nomogram established in this study showed good accuracy in predicting DGF after deceased donor kidney transplantation; additionally, DGF decreased one-year graft survival.

Measuring volumetric segmentation changes in the ipsilateral and contralateral kidney postpartial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the volumetric changes of the ipsilateral and contralateral kidneys and their effect on functional outcome post partial nephrectomy using segmentation analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have analyzed the data of 119 patients from a single surgeon series of partial nephrectomy patients. Median follow-up was 11.40 months. Patients with bilateral tumors, and solitary kidney were excluded from analysis. Volumetric measurements were performed using a semiautomated tissue segmentation tool. A simple linear regression model to assess the predictors for parenchymal volume loss (PVL). A multivariable linear regression model was used to evaluate the association between PVL and warm ischemia time (WIT), controlling for other factors. RESULTS: Mean WIT was 12.09 ± 4.40 minutes and the mean percentage decrease in the volume of the operated kidney was 16.99 ± 13.49%. WIT (ß = 1.24, P < 0.001) and tumor complexity (simple vs. intermediate, ß = 0.06, P = 0.984; simple vs. high, ß = 11.62,P = 0.007) were associated with PVL. A 1 minute increase in WIT was associated with an increase in the percentage volume loss in the operated kidney by 1.38% (ß = 1.20, P < 0.001). Patients with high tumor complexity (ß = 11.17, P = 0.009) had a significantly higher percentage volume loss compared to patients with simple tumor complexity. Ipsilateral PVL (ß = -0.35, P = 0.015) and male gender (ß = -9.89, P = 0.021) were associated with change in eGFR. After adjusting for confounders, % volume loss (ß = -0.32, P < 0.001) remained a significant predictor for contralateral hypertrophy. CONCLUSION: Tumor complexity results in higher WIT and increased PVL as measured by volumetric segmentation. PVL is a key factor associated with functional outcome, and is directly linked to WIT. Increased PVL is also associated with decreased contralateral hypertrophy. Prospective studies with larger samples sizes will be required to validate our findings.

Prediction of pentafecta achievement following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Implications for robot-assisted surgery candidates.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, objective basis for the choice between laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is scarce. To evaluate surgical outcomes, assess the individual benefit from LPN to RAPN, which can guide clinical decision-making. METHODS: Patients underwent LPN or RAPN for a localized renal mass in our center between Jan 2013 and Dec 2016 were included. The surgical outcome of LPN and RAPN was the pentafecta achievement. A multivariable model was fitted to predict the probability of pentafecta achievement after LPN. Model-derived coefficients were applied to calculate the probability of pentafecta achievement in case of LPN among patients treated with RAPN. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing method was applied to plot the observed probability of pentafecta achievement against the predicted pentafecta probability in case of LPN. RESULTS: RAPN group had a significantly higher pentafecta achievement (54.6% vs. 41.1%, P < 0.001) than LPN. Multivariable analyses identified that tumor size, distance of the tumor to collecting system or sinus, and preoperative eGFR were independent predictors of pentafecta after LPN. When RAPN was chosen over LPN, the increase in the probability of pentafecta achievement was greatest in intermediate-probability patients. With the increase or decrease of the probability of pentafecta, the benefit of RAPN decreased. CONCLUSION: When pentafecta achievement are assessed, the benefit of RAPN over LPN varies from patient to patient. Patients at intermediate-probability of pentafecta achievement after LPN benefit the most from robotic surgery, which may be the potential ideal candidates for RAPN.

Effects of donor cause of death, ischemia time, inotrope exposure, troponin values, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data on recipient outcomes: A review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation has become standard of care for pediatric patients with either end-stage heart failure or inoperable congenital heart defects. Despite increasing surgical complexity and overall volume, however, annual transplant rates remain largely unchanged. Data demonstrating pediatric donor heart refusal rates of 50% suggest optimizing donor utilization is critical. This review evaluated the impact of donor characteristics surrounding the time of death on pediatric heart transplant recipient outcomes. METHODS: An extensive literature review was performed to identify articles focused on donor characteristics surrounding the time of death and their impact on pediatric heart transplant recipient outcomes. RESULTS: Potential pediatric heart transplant recipient institutions commonly receive data from seven different donor death-related categories with which to determine organ acceptance: cause of death, need for CPR, serum troponin, inotrope exposure, projected donor ischemia time, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic results. Although DITs up to 8 hours have been reported with comparable recipient outcomes, most data support minimizing this period to <4 hours. CVA as a cause of death may be associated with decreased recipient survival but is rare in the pediatric population. Otherwise, however, in the setting of an acceptable donor heart with a normal echocardiogram, none of the other data categories surrounding donor death negatively impact pediatric heart transplant recipient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic evaluation is the most important donor clinical information following declaration of brain death provided to potential recipient institutions. Considering its relative importance, every effort should be made to allow direct image visualization.

Selective clamping during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with a solitary kidney: is it safe and does it help?

OBJECTIVES: To obtain the most accurate assessment of the risks and benefits of selective clamping in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) we evaluated outcomes of this technique vs those of full clamping in patients with a solitary kidney undergoing RAPN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from institutional review board-approved retrospective and prospective databases from 2006 to 2019 at multiple institutions with sharing agreements were evaluated. Patients with a solitary kidney were identified and stratified based on whether selective or full renal artery clamping was performed. Both groups were analysed with regard to demographics, risk factors, intra-operative complications, and postoperative outcomes using chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests, t-tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: Our initial cohort consisted of 4112 patients, of whom 72 had undergone RAPN in a solitary kidney (51 with full clamping and 21 with selective clamping). There were no significant differences in demographics, tumour size, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), or warm ischaemia time (WIT) between the groups (Table 1). Intra-operative outcomes, including estimated blood loss, operating time, and intra-operative complications were similar in the two groups. Short- and long-term postoperative percentage change in eGFR, frequency of acute kidney injury (AKI), and frequency of de novo chronic kidney disease (CKD) were also not significantly different between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of patients with solitary kidney undergoing RAPN, selective clamping resulted in similar intra-operative and postoperative outcomes compared to full clamping and conferred no additional risk of harm. However, selective clamping did not appear to provide any functional advantage over full clamping as there was no difference observed in the frequency of AKI, CKD or change in eGFR. Short WIT in both groups (<15 min) may have prevented identification of benefits in the selective clamping group; a similar study analysing cases with longer WIT may elucidate any beneficial effects of selective clamping.

A Predictive Model for Intracardiac Pressures in Patients Free From Rejection or Allograft Vasculopathy After Pediatric Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Despite the routine use of hemodynamic assessment in pediatric heart transplant (HT) patients, expected intracardiac pressure measurements in patients free of significant complications are incompletely described. A better understanding of the range of intracardiac pressures in these HT patients is important for the clinical interpretation of these indices and consequent management of patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of pediatric HT recipients who had undergone HT between January 2010 and December 2015 at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital. We analyzed intracardiac pressures measured in the first 12 mo after HT. We excluded those with rejection, graft coronary artery disease, mechanical support, or hemodialysis. We used a longitudinal general additive model with bootstrapping technique to generate age and donor-recipient size-specific curves to characterize filling pressures through 1-y post-HT. RESULTS: Pressure measurements from the right atrium, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were obtained in 85 patients during a total of 829 catheterizations. All pressure measurements were elevated in the immediate post-HT period and decreased to a stable level by post-HT day 90. Pressure measurements were not affected by age group, donor-recipient size differences, or ischemic time. CONCLUSIONS: Intracardiac pressures are elevated in the early post-HT period and decrease to levels typical of the native heart by 90 d. Age, donor-to-recipient size differences, and ischemic time do not contribute to differences in expected intracardiac pressures in the first year post-HT.

Predictive Factors for Improved Renal Function in Renal Transplantation Recipients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to analyze varying predictive factors for improved graft function among renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Two hundred eleven consecutive donor and recipient pairs who underwent renal transplantation between January 2011 and December 2015 were enrolled in our study. Factors that affected renal graft function were analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 16.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, United States). RESULTS: The mean age of donors in years was 30 (range, 17-62), with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 23.20 kg/m2 (range, 16.10-39.50). Mean total warm ischemic time in minutes was 44.80 (range, 26.10-83.45). The mean age of the recipients in years was 48 (range, 12-78) with a mean BMI of 22 kg/m2 (range, 14.80-37.30). Estimated glomerular filtration rate at 6 and 12 months post-transplantation were 69 mL per minute per 1.73 m2 (range, 10-137) and 65 (range, 16-110), respectively. Based on several parameters, there was no significant factor that improved renal graft function at 6 and 12 months after transplant. Total warm ischemic time almost showed statistical significance in predicting improved renal graft function after transplant. Future study with a longer period of observation and a larger sample size should be done for further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Total warm ischemic time is a promising parameter to predict improved renal graft function post-transplantation.

Introducing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy after Experience in Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Approach.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RALDN) can help to improve donor safety by enabling enhanced precision, flexibility, control, and vision. We are presenting our initial series during the introduction of RALDN by comparing our adopted surgical technique, hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (HARPDN), performed at the same time interval. METHODS: We performed 12 RALDN and 27 HARPDN with Pfannenstiel incision between March 2018 and July 2018. We evaluated the demographics, operation duration, warm/cold ischemia time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and donor and recipient serum creatinine levels retrospectively. RESULTS: Demographics including sex, mean of age, and body mass index of the 2 groups were similar. Five cases were right sided nephrectomy in the HARPDN group. We performed only left sided donor nephrectomy in the RALDN group. The duration of operation and warm ischemia time was significantly longer in the robot-assisted group (P < .001). Postoperative major complications were not detected in any of the donors. The function of the transplanted kidneys in both groups was good on the fifth day and 1 month postoperatively. CONCLUSION: We introduced the robot-assisted approach for donor candidates who are not suitable candidates for HARPDN in our center. The operation time and warm ischemia time was longer in the RALDN group, but it did not have any impact on outcome. The robot-assisted donor nephrectomy technique can be introduced safely in centers experienced in the hand-assisted approach.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy without renorrhaphy: Comparative outcomes of cT1a versus cT1b renal tumors.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy without renorrhaphy for cT1b renal tumors compared with cT1a. METHODS: From February 2015 to May 2018, 100 robot-assisted partial nephrectomy patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy without renorrhaphy for renal tumors were included. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records, and compared the perioperative outcomes of 66 and 34 patients for cT1a and cT1b tumors, respectively. Inner suture was carried out in the opened collecting system or renal sinus, whereas parenchymal renorrhaphy was not. For hemostasis, the soft-coagulation system was used, and absorbable hemostats were placed on the resection bed. RESULTS: The median tumor size and RENAL nephrometry score were significantly different between the two groups (cT1a vs cT1b: 23.5 vs 45 mm, P < 0.001, 6 vs 8, P < 0.001). The median operating time and warm ischemic time were significantly longer in the cT1b group than in the cT1a group (154 vs 184 min, P < 0.001; 14 vs 21 min, P < 0.001). The median blood loss was not significantly different (2.5 vs 50 mL, P = 0.109). The positive surgical margin rate was 4.5% versus 11.7% (P = 0.22). Postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher were port-site herniation (one patient), acute cholecystitis (one patient) and pseudoaneurysm (one patient) in the cT1b group. Urinary leakage was not observed in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy without renorrhaphy using the soft-coagulation system and absorbable hemostats appears to be feasible for renal or cT1b tumors. However, longer warm ischemic time and a high rate of complications can be expected compared with cT1a tumors.

The Self-Retaining Barbed Suture for Parenchymal Repair in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives. The warm ischemia time (WIT) is key to successful laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) with a non-SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN. Methods. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to March 2018. Inclusion criteria for this study were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational comparative studies assessing the SRBS and non-SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN. Outcomes of interest included WIT, complications, overall operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and change of renal function. Results. One RCT and 7 retrospective studies were identified, which included a total of 461 cases. Compared with the non-SRBS, use of the SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN was associated with shorter WIT (P < .00001), shorter overall operative time (P < .00001), lower estimated blood loss (P = .02), and better renal function preservation (P = .001). There was no significant difference between the SRBS and non-SRBS with regard to complications (P = .08) and length of hospital stay (P = .25). Conclusions. The SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN can significantly shorten the WIT and overall operative time, decrease blood loss, and preserve renal function.

Clinical Implications of Donor Warm and Cold Ischemia Time in Donor After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation.

The use of donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver allografts has been constrained by limitations in the duration of donor warm ischemia time (DWIT), donor agonal time (DAT), and cold ischemia time (CIT). The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of longer DWIT, DAT, and CIT on graft survival and other outcomes in DCD liver transplants. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was queried for adult liver transplants from DCD donors between 2009 and 2015. Donor, recipient, and center variables were included in the analysis. During the study period, 2107 patients underwent liver transplant with DCD allografts. In most patients, DWIT and DAT were <30 minutes. DWIT was <30 minutes in 1804 donors, between 30 and 40 minutes in 248, and >40 minutes in 37. There was no difference in graft survival, duration of posttransplant hospital length of stay, and readmission rate between DCD liver transplants from donors with DWIT <30 minutes and DWIT between 30 and 40 minutes. Similar outcomes were noted for DAT. In the multivariate analysis, DAT and DWIT were not associated with graft loss. The predictors associated with graft loss were donor age, donor sharing, CIT, recipient admission to the intensive care unit, recipient ventilator dependence, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and low-volume transplant centers. Any CIT cutoff >4 hours was associated with increased risk for graft loss. Longer CIT was also associated with a longer posttransplant hospital stay, higher rate of primary nonfunction, and hyperbilirubinemia. In conclusion, slightly longer DAT and DWIT (up to 40 minutes) were not associated with graft loss, longer posttransplant hospitalization, or hospital readmissions, whereas longer CIT was associated with worse outcomes after DCD liver transplants.

The methods and techniques of identifying renal pedicle vessels during retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy (RLRN and RLPN) have become the preferred modes of management for renal malignancy. One of the most critical steps in the RLRN and RLPN process is to seek and control the renal pedicle. The current study focuses on introducing methods and techniques that can help quickly and accurately identify the renal pedicle vessels during RLRN and RLPN. METHODS: RLRNs and RLPNs were performed for 292 cases in our hospital from November 2014 to January 2017. Different measures were adopted to seek and manage bilateral renal pedicle vessels. All operation procedures were performed by the following three steps: dissection, opening, and clamping. For the left lateral, after the perirenal fat in the dorsal and lateral side was fully dissected, the kidney was pushed toward the ventral side. The renal artery was visible when opening the dense bulging connective tissue, which was located in the middle of the dorsal interior of the kidney. Then, the renal artery was clamped with a Hem-o-lok or the Bulldog clamp. For the right kidney pedicles, the inferior vena cava was first identified and then dissipated upward. When the inferior vena cava was not visible, it was often the location of the right renal artery. The treatment for the artery was the same as for the left renal artery. Relevant clinical characteristics of patients, such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and duration of postoperative drainage, were analyzed retrospectively. The three-step method of identifying renal pedicle vessels during retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy was evaluated. RESULTS: All operations were successfully accomplished with satisfying results, during which the artery could be controlled quickly, and no cases were converted to open surgery due to severe bleeding of renal pedicle vessels. There were no complications involving renal vessels during the entire study. The mean operative times were (81.9 ± 19.71) min and (88.2 ± 21.28) min for RLRN and RLPN, with an average intraoperative blood loss of (91.7 ± 47.10) ml and (62.4 ± 47.45) ml, respectively. The warm ischemia time for RLPN was (19.3 ± 5.6) min. The postoperative drainage-tube was removed within (4.5 ± 1.29) d (RLRN) and (4.6 ± 1.98) d (RLPN); the mean postoperative hospital stay times were (7.0 ± 2.4) d and (5.9 ± 1.98) d, respectively. CONCLUSION: The three-step method of identifying renal pedicle vessels during RLRN and RLPN is direct and feasible, and it may help simplify the operating procedure and improve the safety of the surgery. It may be of great practical application value in the clinical field.

DDD score for renal tumor: An intuitive and comprehensive anatomical scoring system to access the outcomes of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To present a DDD scoring system in assessing the complexity and outcomes of retroperitoneoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for kidney tumor. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 232 patients who underwent retroperitoneoscopic nephron-sparing surgery between January 2013 and September 2017 for a renal tumor. Both the DDD score and RENAL score were used to classify the tumors. The DDD score consisted of the maximal tumor diameter inside the kidney, the maximal tumor depth into the medulla or collecting system and the minimal distance from the tumor to the main renal vessels. RESULTS: The DDD scoring systems were significantly associated with warm ischemia time (P = 0.007) and estimated blood loss (P = 0.017). There was an insignificant positive correlation between the DDD score and the operative time (P = 0.051). Meanwhile, the RENAL score had a significant correlation with the decreasing value of the estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients with high or moderate DDD scores had a 13.6-fold or 8.4-fold risk of overall complications than those with low DDD scores, respectively (all P < 0.05). As for RENAL score, patients with moderate scores had a 2.9-fold risk of overall complications compared with patients in the low scores group (P = 0.004). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the DDD score had the greatest area under the curve for overall complications (area under the curve 0.625, P = 0.009), which was more than the RENAL score (area under the curve 0.620, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The DDD score is an intuitive renal tumor scoring system that is more effective than the RENAL score in complexity assessment, and marginally better in prediction of the risk of overall complications of retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery.

Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: evolving trends.

BACKGROUND: We report our experience with laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS DN). METHODS: Retrospective comparative study of data from 200 Consecutive left LESS DN (group A) compared to 205 consecutive conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) (group B). Standard laparoscopic instruments were used in all patients. Right nephrectomies were excluded. RESULTS: From 05/2015 to 12/2017, 200 LESS DN (group A) and from 10/2011 till 04/2015, 205 LDN (group B) were performed. In group A and B, respectively, the mean operative time was 175.9 ± 24.9 versus 199.88 ± 37.06 min (p = 0.0001), the mean warm ischemia time was 5.2 ± 1.02 versus 3.64 ± 1.38 min (p = 0.0001), the mean BMI was 24.8 ± 4.5 versus 25.2 ± 4.7 kg/m2, complex vascular anatomy was found in 60 (30%) and 68 (33.2%), average length of incision was 5.2 versus 7.7 cm (p = 0.001), scar satisfaction rate 8 versus 6 (p = 0.004), mean morphine equivalents 81.0 versus 70.5 mg; (p = 0.03), average timing for return to work was 42 versus 50 days; (p = 0.001). There was no conversion to open surgery in both groups. One case converted to hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in group A. Pure LESS-DN was successfully completed in 169 patients (84.5%). In group A, due to technical difficulties, additional 1 or 2, 5-mm port(s) was added in 21 and 10 cases, respectively. Two negative explorations were performed in the first post-operative week for picture of small bowel obstruction. We had port site hernia in one donor, superficial wound infection in three donors and blood transfusion was required in two donors in group A. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with LESS-DN is encouraging. LESSDN can be integrated as a standard approach for renal donation without additional donor risk. Moreover, LESS DN gives more flexibility by possibility to add one or more 5-mm ports in case of technical difficulties.

Warm ischemic time as a critical risk factor of graft failure from donors after cardiac death: A single-center experience over three decades in the Kidney Donor Profile Index/Kidney Donor Risk Index era in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic value of the warm ischemic time and the validity of the Kidney Donor Profile Index/Kidney Donor Risk Index for predicting the survival of donors after cardiac death grafts. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 315 kidneys retrieved from donors after cardiac death at Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan. The Kidney Donor Profile Index/Kidney Donor Risk Index was calculated and the grafts were enrolled. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 11.9 years. The Kidney Donor Profile Index had a markedly asymmetric distribution (median 94%), and the Kidney Donor Risk Index had high index rates (0.79-2.94, median 1.70). The overall 5-, 10- and 15-year graft survival rates were 67.5%, 52.1% and 38.9%, respectively. The Kidney Donor Profile Index correlated with graft survival. The 5-, 10- and 15-year graft survival rates for the Kidney Donor Profile Index <1.2 were 87.7%, 73.5% and 59.2%; those for the Kidney Donor Risk Index >2.0 were 55.0%, 34.7% and 22.1%, respectively. A Cox multivariate analysis identified the Kidney Donor Risk Index (hazard ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.48-2.86, P < 0.0001) and warm ischemic time (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.34, P = 0.0010) as independent risk factors for graft loss. The addition of warm ischemic time >30 min had a significant effect, as measured by the C-index (0.708-0.731, P = 0.032), improving the net reclassification improvement score (0.256, P = 0.0039) and integrated discrimination improvement score (0.042, P = 0.0022). CONCLUSIONS: The Kidney Donor Profile Index/Kidney Donor Risk Index is a good prognostic tool for determining the outcomes of donors after cardiac death grafts. However, the warm ischemic time should also be included in the allocation system for donors after cardiac death grafts.

Predictors of renal function after open and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-matched study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate parameters predicting short- and long-term renal function after open partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: Medical records of 896 patients who underwent open partial nephrectomy or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy from 2004 to 2017 at a single large-volume institution were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching of open partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy group was carried out with a ratio of 1:1. Postoperative outcomes were compared, and multivariate logistic regression was carried out to identify the parameters influencing acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease progression. RESULTS: No significant differences in preoperative characteristics were observed between the two study groups after matching. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy was significantly associated with a longer warm ischemic time (P < 0.001) yet, estimated blood loss, positive surgical margin, rates of major postoperative complications and chronic kidney disease progression were significantly lower in the robot-assisted partial nephrectomy group (P < 0.001, 0.033, <0.001, <0.001, and 0.005, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed robot-assisted partial nephrectomy was more favorable than open partial nephrectomy in terms of preserving renal function. Patients with a higher baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate were significantly associated with a greater risk of acute kidney injury (odds ratio 1.036; 95% confidence interval 1.021-1.052; P < 0.001), but a decreased risk of chronic kidney disease progression (odds ratio 0.975; 95% confidence interval 0.955-0.994; P = 0.011). Other independent predictors of chronic kidney disease progression were warm ischemic time (P = 0.025), age (P = 0.035), body mass index (P = 0.041) and diabetes mellitus (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, warm ischemic time and surgery type are independent predictors of both acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease progression. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is more favorable than open partial nephrectomy for reducing estimated blood loss, positive surgical margin, major postoperative complications and renal function preservation.

Navigation of Intelligent/Interactive Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Technique in Laparoscopic or Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Hilar Tumors.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the navigation of intelligent/interactive qualitative and quantitative analysis (IQQA) three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction technique in laparoscopic or robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (LPN or RAPN) for renal hilar tumors. Patients and Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed 26 patients with hilar tumors from February 2016 to February 2018. IQQA 3D reconstruction technique was applied for the purpose of navigation and resection of the tumors. Relevant clinical parameters and surgical outcomes were recorded. Results: All 26 LPN or RAPN were effectively completed without conversion to a hand-assisted or an open approach. Under the navigation of IQQA, all tumors were found precisely at the first time during surgeries. The mean operative time was 142 minutes (142 ± 35), with a mean warm ischemia time of 24.3 minutes (24.3 ± 9.5). The estimated blood loss was 156 mL (156 ± 112). No intraoperative complications occurred. Two patients suffered from postoperative complications. All patients had negative margins on the final pathological examination. At a mean follow-up period of 3 months, the mean glomerular filtration rate is 22.5 mL/min (22.5 ± 7.1) without tumor recurrence. Conclusions: With peculiar features, such as accurate location, complete resection, and fewer perioperative complications, the navigation of IQQA 3D reconstruction technique in partial nephrectomy represents a safe and effective procedure for hilar tumors.

Endoscopic Robot-assisted Simple Enucleation Versus Laparoscopic Simple Enucleation With Single-layer Renorrhaphy in Localized Renal Tumors: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis From a High-volume Centre.

OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative results and early oncological outcomes of endoscopic robot-assisted simple enucleation (ERASE) and laparoscopic simple enucleation (LSE) by using a propensity score-matched analysis. METHODS: We evaluated 383 patients who underwent transperitoneal ERASE or LSE for renal tumors from November 2012 to October 2016. Propensity score matching was performed on age, gender, body mass index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, tumor side and size, preoperative estimated GFR and PADUA score. RESULTS: In total, 278 and 105 patients underwent ERASE and LSE, respectively. The PADUA score was ≥10 for 61 (21.9%) and 13 (12.4%), respectively (P = .034). After matching, mean operative time and warm ischemic time were significantly lower with ERASE than LSE (171.9 vs 188.2 minutes; P = 0.016 and 20.9 vs 24.2 minutes; P = .001). The estimated mean blood loss was similar (167.7 vs 183.3 mL; P = .315). The conversion rate to open surgery or radical nephrectomy was similar with ERASE and LSE (1.0% vs 5.0%, P = .214) and the rate of intraoperative complications was lower (2.0% vs 8.9%, P = .030). The overall incidence of positive surgical margins was similar (P = .614). The median follow-up was less for ERASE than LSE patients (22 vs 38 months). Recurrence did not differ between the 2 groups: 2 ERASE cases (2.0%) versus 4 LSE cases (4.0%) (P = .679). CONCLUSION: ERASE is a safe and acceptable alternative to LSE. ERASE appears to confer shorter operative time, shorter warm ischemic time and lower rate of intraoperative complication.