Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 269
Filtrar
1.
Optom Vis Sci ; 98(3): 258-265, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33771955

RESUMEN

SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides insight into the current recommendations, clinical behaviors, and risk assessments of eye care professionals on the topic of rigid contact lens exposure to tap water. This knowledge may motivate professional organizations to develop initiatives to educate eye care professionals on the dangers of contact lens exposure to water. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the practice patterns and risk perceptions of eye care professionals regarding gas-permeable contact lens exposure to tap water. METHODS: A branched-logic survey was started by 320 clinicians, vision scientists, and industry personnel and was fully completed by 272 participants. The survey queried participants about their current practices, recommendations, and perceptions of risk regarding exposure of gas-permeable contact lenses to tap water. RESULTS: Of those who prescribe gas-permeable contact lenses, 57.4% reported rinsing lenses with tap water, whereas only 32.7% reported engaging in this same behavior in front of patients. Of those who reported never rinsing lenses with tap water, 85.6% indicated that rinsing lenses with water increases infection risk, whereas 52.1% of those who rinse lenses with water reported the same perceived risk (P < .001). Of all participants, 60% indicated that wearing contact lenses while showering increases infection risk, and 50.2% of all participants advised patients to avoid this behavior. CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy exists between perceptions of risk concerning exposure of contact lenses to water and both clinical practices and patient education provided by professionals.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones del Ojo/epidemiología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Agua/efectos adversos , Soluciones para Lentes de Contacto , Lentes de Contacto/microbiología , Lentes de Contacto/parasitología , Infecciones del Ojo/prevención & control , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Ajuste de Prótesis
2.
Cornea ; 40(1): 39-42, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32452985

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of scleral contact lens (SCL) use on the risk for keratoplasty for people with keratoconus. METHODS: The electronic health records of patients receiving eye care at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center between August 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, were reviewed. Patients with a diagnostic code of keratoconus or corneal ectasia, no previous history of keratoplasty, and for whom data were available for both eyes were included. Using a multivariable Cox regression model, associations between SCL use and keratoplasty were tested and adjusted for sociodemographic factors, maximum keratometry, and current contact lens (CL) use. RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred six eyes met the inclusion criteria. CL use in each eye was 36.2% with no CL, 7.2% soft, 33.9% rigid gas permeable (RGP), and 22.7% scleral. A total of 3.2% of eyes underwent keratoplasty. In the adjusted model, SCL or RGP CL use significantly lowered the hazard of undergoing keratoplasty (HR = 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.39, P < 0.0001 and HR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.17-0.52, P < 0.0001, respectively) when compared with no CL use. Factors associated with increased risk of keratoplasty were black race as compared to white (HR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.10-3.16, P = 0.02), younger age (HR = 0.92 per 5-year increment, 95% CI 0.86-0.99, P = 0.032), and lower socioeconomic status (HR = 1.08 per 5-point increase in the Area Deprivation Index, 95% CI 1.03-1.13, P = 0.0008). Keratoplasty was not associated with sex, insurance, or maximum keratometry. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should maximize the use of scleral or RGP CL because patients who successfully use CL have almost one-fifth the risk of undergoing keratoplasty.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Queratocono/cirugía , Queratoplastia Penetrante/estadística & datos numéricos , Esclerótica , Adulto , Topografía de la Córnea , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Agudeza Visual
3.
Afr Health Sci ; 20(2): 768-774, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33163042

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contact lens usage is becoming increasingly popular amongst young people. Assessing their knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to contact lens wear is therefore important, so that gaps in understanding or incorrect practices can be rectified to promote continued safety and success of contact lens wear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess and describe the knowledge, attitudes and practices of contact lens wearers aged 18 to 30 years, in the greater Durban area of South Africa. METHODS: A semi-structured questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practice of the participants. Results: Two hundred and forty six participants completed the survey. Young contact lens wearers in this sample generally had poor knowledge with regards to appropriate hygiene and contact lens wear complications. Despite wearers exhibiting a positive attitude with satisfactory hand hygiene and lens cleaning practices, important aspects such as lens case hygiene, storage and lens removal practices were found to be unsatisfactory. Compliance with after-care visits was also unsatisfactory. CONCLUSION: There is a need for contact lens practitioners to educate young contact lens wearers regarding appropriate contact lens-related care, to promote long term ocular health and contact lens-related safety.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Oftalmopatías/terapia , Desinfección de las Manos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Higiene , Adolescente , Adulto , Población Negra , Soluciones para Lentes de Contacto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Sudáfrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
4.
Clin Exp Optom ; 103(4): 449-453, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32519339

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To determine the extent of scleral lens fitting worldwide and to characterise the associated patient demographics. METHODS: Survey forms were sent to contact lens fitters around the world, every year for 20 consecutive years (2000 to 2019). Practitioners were asked to record data relating to the first 10 contact lens fits or refits performed after receiving the survey. Data were analysed for those countries reporting ≥ 1,000 contact lens fits during this period. RESULTS: A total of 369,209 contact lens fits were recorded from 40 eligible countries, comprising 2,309 scleral lens fits and 366,900 other (non-scleral) lens fits. Overall scleral lenses represented 0.76 per cent of all contact lens fits with significant differences between countries (p < 0.0001), ranging from no fits in six countries: Hungary, Indonesia, Iran, Korea, Malaysia and Singapore, to 5.9 per cent in Switzerland. There has been an increase in scleral lens fitting over the survey period (p < 0.0001), with the rate of fits increasing from negligible (< 0.50 per cent) before 2006 and then increasing from 2011 onward (p < 0.0001). Scleral lenses were fit to older patients (38.5 ± 15.0 years) compared to other lenses (31.4 ± 13.7 years) (p < 0.0001), this age disparity increasing over the survey period (p < 0.0001) and were more likely to be males (scleral lens fits 53 per cent, non-scleral lenses 33 per cent, p < 0.0001). The increase in scleral lens fits is commensurate with the increase in related publications in the peer-reviewed literature over the same period (p < 0.05, r2 = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Scleral lens use has increased since 2011 with these specialised lenses more likely to be fitted to males and older patients than non-scleral lenses.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Optometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Ajuste de Prótesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Eye Contact Lens ; 46(4): 197-200, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32443006

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of erroneous or expired (invalid) contact lens prescriptions submitted for passive verification at two practice sites in Cleveland, OH. METHODS: Passive verification facsimile (FAX) requests were collected from office staff at a county hospital (MetroHealth [MH]), and at a private ophthalmology group office (University Ophthalmology Associates [UOA]) in Cleveland, Ohio, from January 2013 to January 2018. RESULTS: A total of 415 verification requests were evaluated (339 MH, 75 UOA), 28.2% (104 MH, 13 UOA) were expired, 11.8% (48 MH, one UOA) were not under the care of the doctor to whom the request was directed, 8.9% (32 MH, 5 UOA) were incorrect, and 3.9% (16 MH, 0 UOA) did not complete fitting. The total rate of invalid prescriptions was 52.8% (200 MH, 19 UOA). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of invalid prescriptions presented for passive verification. Although the majority of prescriptions are simply expired, there is a fraction of prescriptions that contain incorrect specification of lens parameters or no record of prescription by that doctor. The current mechanism of passive verification, with the burden on the provider for denial within a short time window, makes it likely that such prescriptions would be filled, potentially putting patient comfort and safety at risk.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Electrónica , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervalos de Confianza , Humanos , Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas , Errores de Medicación , Sistemas en Línea , Optometría/legislación & jurisprudencia
7.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther ; 36(8): 595-601, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32456518

RESUMEN

The use of contact lenses as ocular drug delivery systems has been considered intuitive for decades. However, at this time, there are no approved products using such systems. In this article, we review the challenges with current therapies, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of different drug classes and the patient population. In addition, we note the relative lack of clinical studies, and list potential products in active development at this time. In particular, we address the alignment of time course of the therapeutic need, the pharmacokinetics of the molecule, and the delivery characteristics of the systems (e.g., pulsatile vs. zero-order). We also discuss the needs of various populations including the elderly (who may have motor and cognitive issues as well as presbyopia) and the young. While a contact lens delivery system may also provide refractive correction, to date, most of the studies have used noncorrective (plano) lenses. We also considered nanotechnology-based carrier systems. We generalize the development of contact lens delivery systems to all ocular delivery systems in which there are relatively few product approvals and long development times.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/normas , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/instrumentación , Soluciones Oftálmicas/farmacocinética , Presbiopía/terapia , Administración Oftálmica , Anciano , Astigmatismo/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Portadores de Fármacos/farmacocinética , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/tendencias , Diseño de Equipo/métodos , Humanos , Nanotecnología/métodos , Soluciones Oftálmicas/administración & dosificación , Farmacocinética , Ajuste de Prótesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores de Refracción/epidemiología , Propiedades de Superficie/efectos de los fármacos
8.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 46(3): 465-473, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32142042

RESUMEN

To analyze the visual acuity and complications between primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and contact lens wearing, this literature search was performed with data on patients with congenital cataract younger than 2 years published in March 2019. Seven identified studies enrolling 675 eyes were selected for analysis. Patients with primary IOL implantation owned better visual acuity than those with aphakia who wore the contact lens (weighted mean difference = 0.161; 95% CI, 0.108-0.214). For visual axis opacification (VAO), primary IOL implantation increases the incidence of VAO compared with contact lens wearing (relative risk = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13-0.42). No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups about the prevalence of glaucoma and strabismus. Primary IOL implantation achieved better visual outcomes after cataract extraction in patients younger than 2 years. In addition, no higher risk for complications among primary IOL implantation compared with contact lens wearing was noted. Therefore, implanting a primary IOL during congenital cataract surgery is a better therapy for children younger than 2 years than wearing a contact lens.


Asunto(s)
Afaquia Poscatarata/fisiopatología , Catarata/congénito , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Facoemulsificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Seudofaquia/fisiopatología , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino
9.
Clin Exp Med ; 20(1): 31-37, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31679095

RESUMEN

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is a clinical disorder characterized by recurrent, reversible episodes of digital vasospasm. RP can be classified as primary (pRP) or secondary, depending on whether it occurs as a benign condition (not disease-associated) or is associated with other diseases, mainly of the connective tissues. In both cases, it can be triggered by environmental factors, as indicated by the increased incidence of pRP episodes following exposure to cold, vibration injury or chemicals. The purpose of this prospective case-control study was to assess, in an Italian cohort of 132 pRP patients, the association of the phenomenon with demographic, lifestyle habits, environmental and work-related factors. Compared to healthy controls, pRP was found to be inversely associated with the use of contact lenses (OR = 0.4; p = 0.004) and of chlorous-based disinfectants (OR = 0.3; p < 0.001) and directly associated with the presence of prosthesis implants (OR = 5.3; p = 0.001) and the use of hydrogen peroxide-based compounds (OR = 2.6; p = 0.002), suggesting that the latter should be avoided in RP affected patients. Multivariate and multivariable analysis confirmed the associations. Further investigations are needed to understand the mechanism(s) underlying these findings.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Peróxido de Hidrógeno/efectos adversos , Prótesis e Implantes/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Raynaud/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Desinfectantes/química , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Estilo de Vida , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Prospectivos , Prótesis e Implantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad de Raynaud/etiología
10.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye ; 42(6): 646-651, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31229450

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate meibomian gland (MG) width and determine its impact on successful contact lens (CL) use and ocular health. METHODS: A five-site study was conducted by recruiting 18- to 45-year-old subjects who had dropped out of CLs because of discomfort. CL dropouts were compared to age- and sex-matched successful CL wearers. Right eyes were evaluated for tear break-up time, tear meniscus height, MG expressibility, meibum quality, and meibography. Central MG widths were evaluated with a custom MATLAB program. RESULTS: CL dropouts (n = 56) and successful CL (n = 56) wearers had similar grades for upper (p = 1.0) and lower (p = 0.22) MG atrophy, upper (p = 0.07) and lower (p = 0.89) MG tortuosity, and upper (p = 0.92) and lower (p = 0.97) MG widths. Upper eyelid MG widths were narrower than lower eyelid MG widths (p = 0.03). Upper and lower MG tortuosity (p < 0.001) and widths (p = 0.03) were associated, but not atrophy (p = 0.42). Lower eyelid MG widths were associated with MG expressibility (p = 0.01), but MG widths were not with any other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Successful CL wear does not appear to be clinically influenced by MG width or other measures of MG structural integrity. Lower eyelid MGs were wider than upper eyelid MGs and narrower lower eyelid MGs were associated with worse MG expressibility, suggesting that narrower MGs may produce abnormal meibum. Data also suggests that MG factors of both eyelids should be evaluated in practice.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Glándulas Tarsales/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lágrimas/química , Adulto Joven
11.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 28(3): 403-409, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30601087

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess use, knowledge, and complications of cosmetic contact lenses (CCLs) among women of reproductive age. METHODS: A cross-sectional, anonymous self-administered survey assessing cosmetic or decorative contact lens knowledge and experiences was completed by 686 women in Texas in 2017. Main outcome measures were use, knowledge, and associated complications. RESULTS: Almost 1 in 4 women (164/686) reported prior use of CCLs and most had worn the lenses >3 times. Women born in the United States, who knew someone who wore cosmetic lenses, or had visited an eye doctor in the past year were more likely to have used CCLs. Knowledge scores were low and the majority of cosmetic lens users experienced complications (61%). The most frequently reported complications were eye pain and discomfort (35%); itchy, watery eyes (34%); and red, swollen eyes (28%). Borrowing lenses was significantly associated with medical complications (88% of borrowers reported complications). Among 18 respondents who sought medical attention for a CCL-related problem, only 11% obtained care within 24 hours. Few participants had discussed CCL use with an eye doctor in the past year. CONCLUSIONS: Many U.S. women have used CCLs obtained from unauthorized sources. Knowledge of safe practices is very limited and most users develop complications. Interventions are needed to educate the public about the risk of CCL use to reduce adverse outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/efectos adversos , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Lesiones Oculares/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Texas , Adulto Joven
12.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye ; 42(4): 406-410, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30392895

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A market research survey was conducted to assess the impact of offering complimentary contact lenses (CLs) to spectacle-only wearing patients during frame selection with regards to their in-office experience, the transaction amount for their eyewear purchase and the likelihood of proceeding with a comprehensive contact lens fitting. METHODS: Five optometry offices in the US participated. An initial interviewing phase served as a control during which optometrists treated spectacle-only wearing patients in the usual manner for frame selection. After this, the offices transitioned into a test phase where patients were offered the opportunity to wear CLs while selecting new spectacle frames. Only patients 18 or older who had not expressed an interest in CLs were invited to participate. A brief survey was completed on an iPad following the visit by all patients in both control and test phases. RESULTS: 410 patients (205 test, 205 control) participated. 63% of the test group elected to wear CLs (40% spherical, 20% toric, 35% multifocal, 5% monovision). Patients wearing CLs spent more on their eyewear purchase ($708 vs $593, p = 0.04), were greater than 2.5X more likely to have received or scheduled a CL fit (p = 0.01), and were greater than 3X more likely to consider scheduling a CL fitting in the future (p = 0.0003). Additionally, 93% reported that they were highly satisfied with the experience and 86% said they would wear CLs to select frames again (86%). CONCLUSIONS: Offering CLs to spectacle-only patients positively impacts eyewear selection and purchase and can grow the overall CL business.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Anteojos , Optometría/economía , Errores de Refracción/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Pacientes/psicología , Ajuste de Prótesis , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
13.
Rev. bras. oftalmol ; 77(6): 338-341, nov.-dez. 2018. graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-985307

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective: The objective of this project is to describe the epidemiological profile of the Contact Lens Sector of the Benjamin Constant Institute in Rio de Janeiro. Methods: A retrospective study of 788 cases was carried out from March / 2004 to June / 2015. Results: Most of the objects in the cases were female (62.23%). As for the indication, 445 cases (56.47%) were optical, 281 cases (35.65%) were esthetic, 44 cases (5.58%) were prosthetic, and 18 cases (2.30%) were cosmetic. The most prevalent age group was from 20-39 years of age (46.34% of cases), followed by 40-64 years of age (25.31% of cases). Of the total of adapted cases, 81.6% were with rigid lenses, and among the optical medical indications, 61.4% of the cases were by keratoconus. Conclusions: Because it is a reference medical service, whose main objective is the rehabilitation of patients with low vision, the optical medical indication was the most frequent. The rigid lenses showed up with a prominent role in the adaptations.


Resumo Objetivo: Descrever as estatísticas do Setor de Lente de Contato do Instituto Benjamin Constant do Rio de Janeiro. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de 794 casos no período de março/2004 a junho/2015. Resultados: A maior parte dos casos foi do sexo feminino (62,21%) e a indicação mais frequente foi médicas ópticas (56,04%). A faixa etária mais prevalente foi a de 20-39 anos, correspondendo a 46,34%, e em seguida a de 40-64 anos (25,31%). Do total de casos adaptados, 81,6% foram com lentes rígidas. Entre as indicações médicas ópticas 61,4% dos casos foram por ceratocone. Conclusões: Por ser tratar em um serviço médico de referencia, cujo principal objetivo é a reabilitação de pacientes com visão subnormal, a indicação médica óptica foi a mais frequente. As lentes rígidas mostraram-se com papel de destaque nas adaptações.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adaptación Fisiológica , Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Agudeza Visual , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Exp Parasitol ; 192: 42-45, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29859227

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of AK among microbial keratitis as well as their clinical features and to compare their risk factors to those of other infectious keratitis, over the last five years in a referral center in the region of Cap Bon, Tunisia, North Africa. METHODS: A retrospective review of the charts of 230 patients (230 eyes) diagnosed with presumed infectious keratitis between January 2011 and December 2016 at the department of ophthalmology of the university hospital of Nabeul in Tunisia. After a detailed ocular examination using standard technique, corneal scrapes were performed under aseptic conditions from each ulcer. Plates were incubated at 30 °C and screened daily for Amoeba. The treatment was adjusted according to the results of microbiological findings and the response of initial treatment. The mean follow up was 11.4 months (1 month-26 months). RESULTS: A total of 230 corneas were scraped. The prevalence of Acanthamoeba keratitis was 6% (14 cases of 230). All cases of Acanthamoeba keratitis with a history of contact lenses were diagnosed thanks to the test of Contact lenses, their cases or their storage solution, while their corneal scrapings were negative. The corneal scraping was positive for Acanthamoeba only in 4 cases of 14. Acanthamoeba was identified more in young patients (92.8%). Significantly, more patients (54 of 74; 73%) with fungal keratitis and Acanthamoeba keratitis (11 of14; 78.6%) were rural population The most cases of Acanthamoeba keratitis (10 of 14; 71.4%) used contact lenses. Ocular injury was identified in 4 cases of 14 AK (28,5%). Coexistent ocular disease was seen in seven cases of 14 (50%). Of the 230 microbial keratitis, an early diagnosis (≤30 days) was done in 200 cases (86.95%), while a late diagnosis (≥30 days) was made in 30 cases (13%). In AK, most cases (11 of 14; 78,5%) were diagnosed with a delay of more than 30 days. Slit-lamp examination showed stromal infiltrate in 12 cases (85,7%), hypopion in 2 cases (14,3%), immunitary ring in 2 cases (14,3%) and radial keratoneuritis in one case (7,1%). CONCLUSION: Contact lenses were identified as the main risk factor of Acanthamoeba keratitis in our study. The diagnosis of AK should be considered in case of atypical keratitis especially among CL wearers in the rural regions of CapBon where the rules of hygiene are not respected.


Asunto(s)
Queratitis por Acanthamoeba/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/epidemiología , Adulto , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/parasitología , Soluciones para Lentes de Contacto/efectos adversos , Lentes de Contacto/efectos adversos , Lentes de Contacto/parasitología , Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Córnea/parasitología , Femenino , Humanos , Queratitis/epidemiología , Queratitis/microbiología , Masculino , Microscopía Confocal , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Túnez/epidemiología
15.
J Glaucoma ; 27(4): 328-335, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29462013

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess patient acceptance of different methods for delivering sustained-release, intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications. METHODS: Electronic surveys were administered to 150 patients at 2 glaucoma clinics. Participants were questioned on their willingness to accept: (1) drug-eluting contact lenses, (2) ring inserts (3) punctal plugs, and (4) subconjunctival injections as alternatives to IOP-lowering eye drops based on various success levels. Multivariable logistic regression models determined the association between device type and treatment acceptance adjusting for age, sex, study site, cost burden of drops, and previous contact lens use. RESULTS: The majority (69%) of participants were 55 to 74 years of age, and white (65%), and half were female. The majority of participants would accept contacts (59%), rings (51%), plugs (57%), and subconjunctival injections (52%) if they obviated glaucoma surgery; fewer would accept these devices if they reduced (23% to 35%) or eliminated (27% to 42%) drops. Most participants would also accept contacts (56%), plugs (55%), and subconjunctival injections (53%) if they were more effective than eye drops, whereas only 47% would accept a ring; fewer would accept any device if it were equally or less effective than drops. Participants were also 36% (95% confidence interval=0.44-0.92; P=0.02) less likely to accept rings and 32% (95% confidence interval=0.47-0.98; P=0.04) less likely to accept subconjunctival injections as compared with contacts. CONCLUSION: Most glaucoma patients considered sustained drug-delivery modalities acceptable alternatives to IOP-lowering eye drops, but only when they were said to obviate surgery or demonstrate greater efficacy than eye drops.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma , Glaucoma/psicología , Glaucoma/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Lentes de Contacto/efectos adversos , Lentes de Contacto/psicología , Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/efectos adversos , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/psicología , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Glaucoma/epidemiología , Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma/efectos adversos , Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma/psicología , Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Presión Intraocular/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Soluciones Oftálmicas/administración & dosificación , Soluciones Oftálmicas/efectos adversos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tonometría Ocular
16.
Clin Exp Optom ; 101(2): 225-236, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29124780

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate, in an amateur sports-playing population, the prevalence of refractive error, the type of vision correction used during sport and attitudes toward different kinds of vision correction used in various types of sports. METHOD: A questionnaire was used for people engaging in sport and data was collected from sport centres, gyms and universities that focused on the motor sciences. RESULTS: One thousand, five hundred and seventy-three questionnaires were collected (mean age 26.5 ± 12.9 years; 63.5 per cent male). Nearly all (93.8 per cent) subjects stated that their vision had been checked at least once. Fifty-three subjects (3.4 per cent) had undergone refractive surgery. Of the remainder who did not have refractive surgery (n = 1,519), 580 (38.2 per cent) reported a defect of vision, 474 (31.2 per cent) were myopic, 63 (4.1 per cent) hyperopic and 241 (15.9 per cent) astigmatic. Logistic regression analysis showed that the best predictors for myopia prevalence were gender (p < 0.001) and location of sport practice (p < 0.001). Sports that present higher prevalence of outdoor activity have lower prevalence of myopia. Contact lens penetration over the study sample was 18.7 per cent. Contact lenses were the favourite system of correction among people interviewed compared to spectacles and refractive surgery (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that sport was not associated with different levels of myopia prevalence in the adult population. However, subjects engaging in outdoor sports had lower rates of myopia prevalence. Penetration of contact lens use in sport was four times higher than the overall adult population. Contact lenses were the preferred system of correction in sports compared to spectacles or refractive surgery, but this preference was affected by the type of sport practised and by the age and level of sports activity for which the preference was required.


Asunto(s)
Errores de Refracción/epidemiología , Errores de Refracción/terapia , Deportes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Niño , Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Anteojos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Refracción Ocular , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Refractivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Sexo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Agudeza Visual , Adulto Joven
17.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye ; 41(2): 229-233, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29221709

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence and general knowledge of contact lens wearers among college students in Chengdu, a metroplolitan of Chinaand find out the routine habits of use and hygienic conditions when wearing contact lenses. METHOD: The questionnaire was distributed to 1,600 ametropic participants who were from 8 different universities. Data about demographics, general contact lens handling habits, personal attitudes, hygiene behaviors and eye health conditions were collected. We made the analysis ofthe demographics and wearing of contact lenses. Possible reasons for behaviors related to the care of contact lenses were analyzed. RESULTS: The prevalence of contact lens use was 19.80%. Most users (82.15%) were females. An aesthetic effect was cited as the first reason for using (57.91%). The comfort of eyes was the first consideration (75.76%) when buying. To keep clean and use safe, 86.20% subjects washed hands before handling and 83.50% cleaned the lens carefully after removing. There was significant difference between males and females regarding the replacement of the solution (p=0.014). 32.66% wears knew the removal of protein deposits. A total of 54.88% were not informed of the potential complications of contact lens. The incidence of ocular discomfort was 44.78%. Only 3.03% of the students paid regular visits to ophthalmic clinics. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of contact lenses was relatively low in Chengdu. The wears had limited knowledge about using and careof contact lens. More education on standard lens wear and care should be provided to wearers.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , China/epidemiología , Comportamiento del Consumidor/estadística & datos numéricos , Soluciones para Lentes de Contacto/uso terapéutico , Desinfección/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Universidades , Adulto Joven
18.
Eye Contact Lens ; 44 Suppl 1: S273-S282, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28617731

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the retention rate (RR) for neophyte patients fitted with contact lenses (CLs) and to identify factors associated with retention and dropout. METHOD: This multisite, sponsor-masked registry study evaluated the 1-year status of neophyte CL wearers fitted in a representative range of UK practices. A total of 26 UK investigational sites each recruited up to 89 neophyte patients. The participants were requested to complete surveys at 1 month (±1 week from date of fitting), 3 months (±2 weeks), and 12 months (±3 weeks) online or through phone. Participants were contacted by email (or phone) and invited to complete an online survey that asked a range of questions regarding their CL wearing experience. RESULTS: Of the 531 participants recruited, 65.3% (347/531) responded to at least one follow-up survey and 42.3% (225/531) responded to all three surveys. One in four patients showed discontinued CL wear by 12 months. Based on evaluable subjects at 12 months, the RR was 77.6% (194/250, 95% confidence interval: 72.0-82.3). The most common reason for discontinuation was problems with vision (41%), followed by discomfort (36%) and handling problems (25%). The factors affecting first-year RRs: sex, spherical refraction, lens usage (full time or part time), and supply method (collected or posted). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study, the first-year RR for neophyte CL wearers was 77.6%. This was consistent with that noted in a retrospective study: 74.0%. As with the previous study, the commonly cited reason for discontinuation was visual problems.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Ajuste de Prótesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Agudeza Visual , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
19.
Optom Vis Sci ; 95(1): 70-75, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29252903

RESUMEN

SIGNIFICANCE: This case series demonstrates successful use of PROSE (Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem) for overnight wear among patients with persistent epithelial defects, while exploring the efficacy of using PROSE reservoir for autologous hematopoietic products during treatment. PURPOSE: This case series proposes a strategic approach to the treatment of refractory cases of persistent epithelial defect via overnight PROSE device wear. CASE REPORTS: We followed three patients with persistent epithelial defect treated with PROSE devices and observed expedited defect resolution and improvement in best-corrected visual acuity over the course of 2 to 4 weeks. In addition to moxifloxacin and preservative-free saline, autologous hematopoietic products were added to the reservoir of two patient's PROSE devices. Patients were advised to wear their PROSE device at all times except for lens cleaning and replacement of reservoir contents every 12 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these cases demonstrated the safety and efficacy of overnight wear of PROSE devices in the treatment of refractory persistent epithelial defect (PED).


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto , Enfermedades de la Córnea/terapia , Epitelio Corneal/patología , Esclerótica , Adulto , Anciano , Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades de la Córnea/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Repitelización/fisiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología
20.
Clin Exp Optom ; 100(5): 459-472, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28771841

RESUMEN

Contact lens wear is a popular, convenient and effective method for vision correction. In recent years, contact lens practice has expanded to include new paradigms, including orthokeratology; however, their use is not entirely without risk, as the incidence of infection has consistently been reported to be higher in contact lens wearers. The explanations for this increased susceptibility have largely focused on physical damage, especially to the cornea, due to a combination of hypoxia, mechanical trauma, deposits and solution cytotoxicity, as well as poor compliance with care routines leading to introduction of pathogens into the ocular environment. However, in recent years, with the increasing availability and reduced cost of molecular techniques, the ocular environment has received greater attention with in-depth studies of proteins and other components. Numerous proteins were found to be present in the tears and their functions and interactions indicate that the tears are far more complex than formerly presumed. In addition, the concept of a sterile or limited microbial population on the ocular surface has been challenged by analysis of the microbiome. Ocular microbiome was not considered as one of the key sites for the Human Microbiome Project, as it was thought to be limited compared to other body sites. This was proven to be fallacious, as a wide variety of micro-organisms were identified in the analyses of human tears. Thus, the ocular environment is now recognised to be more complicated and interference with this ecological balance may lead to adverse effects. The use of contact lenses clearly changes the situation at the ocular surface, which may result in consequences which disturb the balance in the healthy eye.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Córnea/metabolismo , Microbiota/fisiología , Proteoma/metabolismo , Proteostasis/fisiología , Lágrimas/metabolismo , Humanos , Errores de Refracción/terapia , Trastornos de la Visión/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA