Importance of Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Perioperative Catatonia: A Case Report.

Symptoms of catatonia include silence, motionlessness, and postural retention. Although it is important to detect and treat catatonia early, before it becomes severe, postoperative cases have inherent risks that hinder diagnosis and treatment. A 60-year-old man with schizophrenia underwent endoscopic/thoracoscopic esophagectomy and was extubated in the operating room. In the intensive care unit (ICU), he had stiffness in the neck, ankles, and knees, catalepsy during passive knee flexion, mild disturbance of consciousness, mild creatine kinase elevation, and respiratory depression. Intravenous diazepam was administered for diagnosis, and the patient's rapid improvement indicated catatonia. He was intubated and started on lorazepam; tapering produced no recurrence of symptoms. The patient was extubated and transferred to the general ward on postoperative Day 2. Because this patient was extubated in the operating room and was managed postoperatively in the ICU with a full-time doctor, his symptoms were easily recognized and early diagnosis was possible. Thus, we were able to administer drug therapy quickly and adequately and perform forward management that accounted for postoperative risks, thereby achieving a favorable outcome.

Psychogenic Hyperphagia: Excessive Eating as Stereotypy in a Patient with Catatonia.

Catatonia is a complex syndrome with unique cognitive, psychomotor, and mood features. Mannerisms and stereotypies are catatonic signs that have been extensively observed and described in the literature, mostly in the context of movements or motor acts. Stereotypies are commonly described as repetitive psychomotor or verbal acts with the abnormality not inherent in the act but in its frequency. Mannerisms, like stereotypies, are repetitive psychomotor or verbal acts, but they are fundamentally odd in nature. Recently, several reports have described these phenomena in the context of complex behaviors, such as eating and drinking. Identification and appreciation of personal and cultural norms, in addition to a careful analysis of behavioral processes and actions, are important tools for clinicians to identify these potentially elusive and often missed patterns of behavior in patients with catatonia. We present the case of a 30-year-old male with a psychiatric history of treatment-resistant, recurrent major depressive disorder with psychotic features who presented to the inpatient psychiatric unit with signs of catatonia, including repeated, purposeless eating. The patient's chart was reviewed, and a literature review was conducted using PubMed with the keywords catatonia, stereotypies, mannerisms, and hyperphagia. The patient, who was diagnosed with catatonia and expressed hyperphagia as a stereotypy, responded to lorazepam. This case shows that hyperphagia may present as a stereotypy in patients with catatonia.

Catatonia in patients with dementia: A descriptive study of clinical profiles and treatment response.

BACKGROUND: Catatonia is a highly prevalent syndrome in patients presenting with major neurocognitive disorders (dementia). In this study, we aim to provide a comprehensive description of the clinical and therapeutic aspects of catatonia in patients with dementia. METHOD: This descriptive study, conducted between September 2015 and June 2022, collected data from 25 patients diagnosed with dementia, out of 143 patients treated for catatonia in our specialized psychiatry department. We collected sociodemographic, clinical and treatment data for each patient. RESULTS: Dementia patients constituted 17% of the catatonic cases. Predominantly female, the cohort had a mean age of 65. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's (4 patients, 17%) and Parkinson's (1 patient, 4%) diseases, Lewy body dementia (5 patients, 21%), vascular dementia (4 patients, 17%) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (10 patients, 41%). The mean Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale score upon admission was 20/69. Overall, complete remission of catatonia was achieved in 75% of patients (n=18), with only 13% (n=3) responding to lorazepam alone, while others required additional interventions such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and/or amantadine. Vascular dementia was predominantly observed in cases resistant to treatment. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate a frequent co-occurrence of catatonia and dementia, highlighting treatability yet suggesting a potential for resistance to lorazepam, which varies by dementia diagnosis. Investigating the mechanisms underlying this resistance and the variability in treatment response is crucial for developing more precise therapeutic strategies.

Predictors for and use of rescue medication in adults with epilepsy: A multicentre cross-sectional study from Germany.

BACKGROUND: Seizure clusters, prolonged seizures, and status epilepticus are life-threatening neurological emergencies leading to irreversible neuronal damage. Benzodiazepines are current evidence-based rescue therapy options; however, recent investigations indicated the prescription of mainly unsuitable benzodiazepines and inappropriate use of rescue medication. OBJECTIVE: To examine current use, satisfaction, and adverse events concerning rescue medication in patients with epilepsy in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at epilepsy centres in Frankfurt am Main, Greifswald, Marburg, and Münster between 10/2020 and 12/2020. Patients with an epilepsy diagnosis were assessed based on a questionnaire examining a 12-month period. RESULTS: In total, 486 patients (mean age: 40.5, range 18-83, 58.2 % female) participated in this study, of which 125 (25.7 %) reported the use of rescue medication. The most frequently prescribed rescue medications were lorazepam tablets (56.8 %, n = 71 out of 125), buccal midazolam (19.2 %, n = 24), and rectal diazepam (10.4 %, n = 13). Seizures continuing for over several minutes (43.2 %, n = 54), seizure clusters (28.0 %, n = 35), and epileptic auras (28.0 %, n = 35) were named as indications, while 28.0 % (n = 35) stated they administered the rescue medication for every seizure. Of those continuing to have seizures, 46.0 % did not receive rescue medication. On average, rescue medication prescription occurred 7.1 years (SD 12.7, range 0-66) after an epilepsy diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Unsuitable oral benzodiazepines remain widely prescribed for epilepsy patients as rescue medication. Patients also reported inappropriate use of medication. A substantial proportion of patients who were not seizure-free did not receive rescue medication prescriptions. Offering each patient at risk for prolonged seizures or clusters of seizures an individual rescue treatment with instructions on using it may decrease mortality and morbidity and increase quality of life. .

A Retrospective Evaluation of Adjunctive Phenobarbital vs. Benzodiazepine Alone for the Treatment of Moderate Alcohol Withdrawal in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Phenobarbital has been used in the emergency department (ED) as both a primary and adjunctive medication for alcohol withdrawal, but previous studies evaluating its impact on patient outcomes are limited by heterogenous symptom severity. OBJECTIVES: We compared the clinical outcomes of ED patients with moderate alcohol withdrawal who received phenobarbital, with or without benzodiazepines, with patients who received benzodiazepine treatment alone. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single academic medical center utilizing chart review of ED patients with moderate alcohol withdrawal between 2015 and 2020. Patient encounters were classified into two treatment categories based on medication treatment: phenobarbital alone or in combination with benzodiazepines vs. benzodiazepines alone. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact was used to analyze categorical variables and the Student's t-test for continuous data. RESULTS: Among the 287 encounters that met inclusion criteria, 100 received phenobarbital, compared with 187 that received benzodiazepines alone. Patients who received phenobarbital were provided significantly more lorazepam equivalents. There was a significant difference in the percentage of patient encounters that required admission to the hospital in the phenobarbital cohort compared with the benzodiazepine cohort (75% vs. 43.3%, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in admission level of care to the floor (51.2% vs. 52.0%), stepdown (33.8% vs. 28%), or intensive care unit (15% vs. 20%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received phenobarbital for moderate alcohol withdrawal were more likely to be admitted to the hospital, but there was no difference in admission level of care when compared with patients who received benzodiazepines alone. Patients who received phenobarbital were provided greater lorazepam equivalents in the ED.

EEG and video documentation of benzodiazepine challenge in catatonic stupor: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Catatonia, a psychomotor disorder characterized by diverse clinical signs, including stupor and mutism, remains elusive in its causes and a challenge to diagnose. Moreover, it is often underrecognized due to its resemblance to disorders of consciousness. However, when diagnosing catatonia, an antipsychotic medication may exacerbate the condition. The first-line treatment typically includes benzodiazepines and/or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). CASE REPORT: A 60-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and epilepsy presented with catatonic stupor. Despite stable treatment, she experienced an acute deterioration in consciousness, requiring hospitalization. Her condition improved markedly following a benzodiazepine challenge, as documented on EEG. This improvement was short-lived, but a second benzodiazepine challenge restored her from E1V1M1 (stupor) to E4V5M6 within minutes, as documented by a video recording. The patient was treated with lorazepam 1.5 mg/day orally and did not experience further relapses. DISCUSSION: The diagnosis of catatonia had been based on her scores on the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS; Screening, 6/14; Severity, 19), despite meeting only two DSM-5 criteria for catatonia (stupor and mutism). The diagnosis was supported by EEG and video documentation, excluding other potential differential diagnoses such as nonconvulsive status epilepticus and encephalopathy. Additional quantitative EEG analyses indicated that benzodiazepine administration increased brainwide alpha and beta band power significantly, suggesting that the benzodiazepine normalized attention, consciousness, and long-range synchronization. This report additionally emphasizes the significance of video recordings in managing catatonia, and it helps in accurately tracking symptoms, documenting comprehensively, and improving patient understanding, which is crucial for treatment adherence.

Thought Blocking as a Manifestation of Catatonia: A Case Report.

ABSTRACT: Catatonia is an underrecognized disorder that has been widely described as a psychomotor syndrome, with little emphasis on its thought and cognitive dimensions. The current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision describes only motor and behavioral presentations, whereas a few catatonia scales describe only one form of thought disorders, which is thought perseveration. Thought blocking, a disorder of the thought process, is characterized by regular interruptions in the thought stream. It was described by several scholars as a sign of schizophrenia, with few reports describing thought blocking in association with catatonia. In this article, we describe the course of a patient with bipolar I disorder who presented with catatonia and demonstrated thought blocking. Her catatonic symptoms and thought blocking improved with the addition of lorazepam, recurred upon lorazepam discontinuation, and improved with resumption of lorazepam, demonstrating a clear on/off phenomenon. This report highlights the importance of recognizing thought and cognitive manifestations of catatonia, as it can enhance recognition and improve treatment.

The role of benzodiazepines in common conditions: a narrative review focusing on lormetazepam.

This review aimed to examine the place of benzodiazepines, specifically lormetazepam, in the treatment of insomnia, including during pregnancy or in patients with psychodermatoses. PubMed was searched for the term "lormetazepam" in association with MeSH terms encompassing anxiety, insomnia/sleep disorders, pregnancy/gestation, and psychodermatoses/skin disorders. English-language articles up to 31 July 2022 were identified. Ad hoc searches for relevant literature were performed at later stages of review development. Multiple randomized, placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated that lormetazepam dose-dependently increases total sleep time, decreases wakefulness over a dosing range of 0.5-2.0 mg, and improves subjective assessments of sleep quality. Lormetazepam is as effective as other benzodiazepines in improving sleep duration and quality, but is better tolerated than the long-acting agents with minimal next-day effects. Benzodiazepines can be used as short-term monotherapy at the lowest effective dose during the second or third trimesters of pregnancy; lormetazepam is also a reasonable choice due to its limited transplacental passage. Insomnia associated with skin disorders or pregnancy can be managed by effective symptom control (especially itching), sleep hygiene, treatment of anxiety/depression, and a short course of hypnotics.

Lorazepam in catatonia - Past, present and future of a clinical success story.

The effect of lorazepam in the treatment of catatonia is outstanding and almost immediate. Clinicians are familiar with its effects: mute patients can speak again, akinetic patients can move again and patients with negativism can eat and drink again within usually a short duration of about 10 min to 1-2 h. Fear is often gone after lorazepam administration. While not always effective, the introduction of lorazepam into clinical practice represented a breakthrough and was often life-saving for many patients suffering from catatonia. It is rare to observe such rapid therapeutic effects in other domains of psychiatry. In this narrative review we will briefly look at the past, present and future of lorazepam in the treatment of catatonia. It is gratifying to reflect on the fact that clinicians using the age-old medical practice of observation and empirical treatment succeeded in advancing the management of catatonia 40 years ago. The present evidence shows that the clinical effect of lorazepam in catatonia treatment is excellent and more or less immediate although it remains to be explicitly tested against other substances such as diazepam, zolpidem, clozapine, quetiapine, amantadine, memantine, valproate and dantrolene in randomized clinical trials. In addition, future studies need to answer the question how long lorazepam should be given to patients with catatonia, months or even years? This narrative review promotes the rapid use of lorazepam in the treatment of acute catatonic patients and stipulates further scientific examination of its often impressive clinical effects.

A Comparison of Injectable Diazepam and Lorazepam in the Goal-Directed Management of Severe Alcohol Withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines are the gold standard for treatment of alcohol withdrawal, yet the selection of a preferred benzodiazepine is limited due to a lack of comparative studies. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of injectable lorazepam (LZP) and diazepam (DZP) in the treatment of severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit with a primary diagnosis of AWS. Subjects who received at least 12 LZP equivalent units (LEU) of injectable DZP or LZP within 24 hours of initiation of the severe AWS protocol were included. The primary outcome was time with Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised (CIWA-Ar) scores at goal over the first 24 hours of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients were included (DZP n = 89, LZP n = 102). Time with CIWA-Ar scores at goal during the first 24 hours was similar between groups (DZP 12 hours [interquartile range, IQR, = 9-15] vs LZP 14 hours [IQR = 10-17]), P = 0.06). At 24 hours, LEU requirement was similar (DZP 40 [IQR = 22-78] vs LZP 32 [IQR = 18-56], P = 0.05). Drug cost at 24 hours was higher in the DZP group ($204.6 [IQR = 112.53-398.97] vs $8 [IQR = 4.5-14], P < 0.01). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: DZP or LZP are equally efficacious for the treatment of severe AWS. LZP may be preferred due to cost but both medications can be used interchangeably based on availability.

Eliminating the benzos: A benzodiazepine-sparing approach to preventing and treating alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) represents significant cost to the hospitalized trauma population from a clinical and financial perspective. Historically, AWS has been managed with benzodiazepines. Despite their efficacy, benzodiazepines carry a heavy adverse effect profile. Recently, benzodiazepine-sparing protocols for the prophylaxis and treatment of AWS have been used in medical patient populations. Most existing benzodiazepine-sparing protocols use phenobarbital, while ours primarily uses gabapentin and clonidine, and no such protocol has been developed and examined for safety and efficacy specifically within a trauma population. METHODS: In December of 2019, we implemented our benzodiazepine-sparing protocol for trauma patients identified at risk for alcohol withdrawal on admission. Trauma patients at risk for AWS admitted to an academic Level 1 trauma center before (conventional) and after (benzodiazepine-sparing [BS]) protocol implementation were compared. Outcomes examined include morphine milligram equivalent dosing rates and lorazepam equivalent dosing rates as well as the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, revised (CIWA-Ar) scores, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and ventilator days. RESULTS: A total of 387 conventional and 134 benzodiazepine sparing patients were compared. Injury Severity Score (13 vs. 16, p = 0.10) and admission alcohol levels (99 vs. 149, p = 0.06) were similar. Patients in the BS pathway had a lower maximum daily CIWA-Ar (2.7 vs. 1.5, p = 0.04). While mean morphine milligram equivalent per day was not different between groups (31.5 vs. 33.6, p = 0.49), mean lorazepam equivalents per day was significantly lower in the BS group (1.1 vs. 0.2, p < 0.01). Length of stay and vent days were not different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a benzodiazepine-sparing pathway that uses primarily clonidine and gabapentin to prevent and treat alcohol withdrawal syndrome in trauma patients is safe, reduces the daily maximum CIWA-Ar, and significantly decreases the need for benzodiazepines. Future studies will focus on outcomes affected by avoiding AWS and benzodiazepines in the trauma population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Revisión de la utilización de la prueba con lorazepam como evaluación diagnóstica de catatonía / Review of the utilization of the lorazepam test as a diagnostic evaluation of catatonia

La catatonía es un síndrome neuropsiquiátrico que se presenta con una serie heterogénea de signos y síntomas psicomotores, afectivos, conductuales y autonómicos. Es una manifestación inespecífica de ciertos trastornos mentales, metabólicos, inmunológicos, endocrinológicos, infecciosos y neurológicos, y es fundamental establecer estrategias de diagnóstico precoz para implementar medidas terapéuticas eficaces y oportunas. El objetivo de esta revisión sistematizada es evaluar la utilidad de la prueba de lorazepam como estrategia diagnóstica en individuos con catatonía. Se utilizó los buscadores Cochrane, Lilacs, Scielo, Pubmed y Scopus. Los artículos seleccionados son ensayos clínicos y cohortes prospectivos, en los cuales se analizó la forma de diagnóstico de catatonía, la utilización y protocolo de la prueba de lorazepam y las medidas de respuesta. La búsqueda inicial determinó 87 artículos; aplicando los criterios de inclusión y exclusión se culminó en la elección de 8 artículos. La identificación de la catatonía presenta dificultades y su diagnóstico es variable, lo cual genera limitaciones en cuanto a intervenciones precoces. Existe una heterogeneidad de evaluaciones y de estrategias, pero la bibliografía es sugerente en cuanto a la utilización de lorazepam como evaluación confirmatoria y tratamiento inicial de la catatonía. La prueba de lorazepam forma parte de un protocolo de manejo, y puede ser un paso en la toma de decisiones para que individuos con catatonía reciban una intervención oportuna. Se concluye que la prueba de lorazepam es una técnica accesible y replicable, con resultados prometedores para su eventual implementación, pero se necesita nuevos estudios que involucren su aplicación estandarizada.

Catatonia is a neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by a heterogeneous range of psychomotor, affective, behavioral, and autonomic signs and symptoms. It is a nonspecific manifestation of certain mental, metabolic, immunological, endocrinological, infectious, and neurological disorders. Therefore, it is essential to establish early diagnostic strategies to implement effective and timely therapeutic measures. This review aims to evaluate the utility of the Lorazepam Challenge Test as a diagnostic strategy in individuals with catatonia. A review was conducted using search engines such as Cochrane, Lilacs, Scielo, Pubmed, and Scopus. The initial search yielded 87 articles, and after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 articles were selected. The selected articles are clinical trials and prospective cohorts, where catatonia diagnosis, the use and protocol of the Lorazepam Challenge Test, and response measures were analyzed. Identifying catatonia is challenging, and its diagnosis varies, leading to limitations in early interventions. There is a heterogeneity of evaluations and strategies, but the literature suggests the use of lorazepam as a confirmatory evaluation and initial treatment for catatonia. The Lorazepam Challenge Test is part of a management protocol and can be a decision-making step for individuals with catatonia to receive timely intervention. It is concluded that The Lorazepam Challenge Test is an accessible and replicable technique with promising results for potential implementation, requiring further studies involving its standardized application.

Using Interdisciplinary Teams to Mitigate the Effects of Drug Shortages in Palliative Care: The Case of Lorazepam Injection.

Given the rising frequency of drug shortages in hospitals, interdisciplinary collaboration is necessary to manage medications, modify electronic medical records, and evaluate safety outcomes. One such shortage impacted lorazepam injection, a medication commonly used in palliative care to treat anxiety, agitation, and seizures. In anticipation of the lorazepam shortage in the summer of 2022, pharmacy staff collaborated with palliative care physicians to identify alternative treatment recommendations when providers were prohibited from ordering lorazepam injection. Before the shortage, lorazepam was used an average of 95 times per month on the palliative care unit. The overall use of benzodiazepines decreased substantially following the recommendation for the therapeutic alternative, midazolam, during the shortage. Once the shortage ended, use roughly returned to pre-shortage baselines. During this time, there were no patient safety events documented on the palliative care unit. Moreover, no changes to the care experience were reported by patients, family/caregivers, providers, or staff. The collaborative effort between pharmacy and palliative care specialists resulted in alternative treatments for palliative care patients during the drug shortage. This preserved the hospital's supply of lorazepam injection for a patient population with no suitable alternatives while still allowing for management of palliative patients.

Acute Treatment of Adolescent Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome With Haloperidol, Lorazepam, and/or Capsaicin: A Single Institution Case Series.

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS), an under-recognized and seemingly paradoxical condition, arises in some adolescents and adults who chronically use cannabis. It presents acutely with intractable nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain but standard antiemetic therapy leads to improvement for only a minority of patients. Randomized controlled trial evidence in adults indicates the superiority of haloperidol over ondansetron in alleviating the acute symptoms of CHS, but safe and effective treatment for adolescents with the disorder is currently unknown. The successful use of topical capsaicin has also been reported. We report a case series of 6 adolescent patients with CHS who presented to Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital and were treated with haloperidol, lorazepam, and/or capsaicin. Four patients given 5 mg intravenous (IV) haloperidol and 2 mg IV lorazepam and 1 patient treated with 5 mg IV haloperidol and peri-umbilical topical capsaicin (0.025%) experienced full acute symptomatic relief. One patient, treated only with topical capsaicin, reported improvement of symptoms with some persistent nausea. Haloperidol/lorazepam, haloperidol/capsaicin, and topical capsaicin alone appear safe and effective in adolescents, but larger studies are required to confirm our findings.

Utilization of Antiseizure Medications in Women of Childbearing Age With Epilepsy and Nonepilepsy Indications: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are among the most commonly prescribed teratogenic drugs in women of childbearing age. Limited data exist on utilization patterns across different indications for therapy and for the newer-generation ASMs in this population. Thus, we assessed the pattern of ASM use in women of childbearing age with epilepsy and nonepilepsy indications (pain and psychiatric disorders). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of deidentified administrative data submitted to the Optum Clinformatics database. Eligible participants included women aged 12-50 years who filled ASMs between year 2011 and 2017. Participants were followed from date of index prescription filled to study end or insurance disenrollment, whichever came first. For the overall cohort and potential therapy indications, we assessed the type and frequency of ASMs filled; proportion of participants on monotherapy, polytherapy, or treatment switching; and duration of continuous use. Trends were characterized using annual percent change from study start to study end. RESULTS: Our analysis included 465,131 participants who filled 603,916 distinct ASM prescriptions. At baseline, most of the participants had chronic pain (51.0%) and psychiatric disorders (32.7%), with epilepsy the least common (0.9%). The most frequently dispensed were diazepam (24.3%), lorazepam (20.1%), gabapentin (17.4%), clonazepam (12.7%), topiramate (11.3%), and lamotrigine (4.6%). Significant linear increase in trends were observed with gabapentin (annual percent change [95% CI]: 8.4 [7.3-9.4]; p < 0.001) and levetiracetam (3.4 [0.7-6.2]; p = 0.022) and decreasing trends for diazepam (-3.5 [-2.4 to 4.5]; p < 0.001) and clonazepam (-3.4 [-2.3 to 4.5]; p = 0.001). No significant change in trend was observed with valproate (-0.4 [-2.7 to 1.9]; p = 0.651), while nonlinear changes in trends were observed with lorazepam, topiramate, lamotrigine, and pregabalin. DISCUSSION: Decreasing trends were observed with older ASMs in the overall cohort and across the potential indications for therapy. Conversely, increasing trends were seen with the newer ASMs. Considering the risk of teratogenicity associated with the newer medications largely unknown, counseling and education in addition to a careful consideration of the benefits vs potential risks should remain pivotal when prescribing ASMs for women of childbearing age.

Sublingual lorazepam as rescue therapy for seizure emergencies in adults.

OBJECTIVE: Limited acute home treatments are available for patients with prolonged (>5 minutes) or repetitive (≥2 in 24 hours) seizures. While this early seizure treatment may reduce the need for emergency care, intermittent intranasal benzodiazepine formulations are expensive and rectal diazepam administration is often socially unacceptable. We determined whether caregivers could use sublingual lorazepam oral concentrate solution effectively as acute treatment for adults with prolonged and repetitive seizures. METHODS: Patients prescribed sublingual lorazepam solution at the Johns Hopkins Epilepsy Center for acute seizure treatment during a 5-year period (2012-2017) were screened. We determined clinical history of seizure patterns and number of antiseizure medications (ASMs) through patient and caregiver surveys, and we verified this history in patients' medical records and charts. During a 2-year span (2017-2018), patients and caregivers were surveyed on responses to their most recent use of sublingual lorazepam solution, including seizure cessation (prolonged seizure stopping <5 minutes or ≤1 repetitive seizure), presence of sedation and adverse events within 24 hours of administration, and whether refrigeration limited use. RESULTS: In total, 52 patients used sublingual lorazepam for treatment of acute seizures during the study period (median dose 1 mg, range 0.5 to 2 mg). Of them, 48 patients participated in treatment survey interviews. Family caregivers usually administered lorazepam (88%); 3 self-administered. Patients were surveyed on responses to their most recent use of sublingual lorazepam treatment: 66% (23/35) of patients with repetitive seizures reported no further seizure activity after administering treatment; 70% (7/10) with prolonged seizures reported seizure activity ceased within 5 minutes of treatment. Three patients treated auras and had no seizures. There were no serious adverse events during most recent use: 31% of patients developed moderate/severe sedation. Of note, 98% refrigerated lorazepam, often with coolers; 44%, however, said this limited treatment access. There was high treatment satisfaction; 79% reported that having the emergency treatment available made them feel safer. SIGNIFICANCE: This patient survey and retrospective chart review demonstrates that home treatment with sublingual lorazepam solution may be effective for interrupting prolonged and repetitive seizures. No patients had sedation complications with home doses of 0.5 to 2 mg, and patients report high satisfaction with the treatment.