Treatments for intractable constipation in childhood.

BACKGROUND: Constipation that is prolonged and does not resolve with conventional therapeutic measures is called intractable constipation. The treatment of intractable constipation is challenging, involving pharmacological or non-pharmacological therapies, as well as surgical approaches. Unresolved constipation can negatively impact quality of life, with additional implications for health systems. Consequently, there is an urgent need to identify treatments that are efficacious and safe. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatments used for intractable constipation in children. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers up to 23 June 2023. We also searched reference lists of included studies for relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any pharmacological, non-pharmacological, or surgical treatment to placebo or another active comparator, in participants aged between 0 and 18 years with functional constipation who had not responded to conventional medical therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were symptom resolution, frequency of defecation, treatment success, and adverse events; secondary outcomes were stool consistency, painful defecation, quality of life, faecal incontinence frequency, abdominal pain, hospital admission for disimpaction, and school absence. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each primary outcome. MAIN RESULTS: This review included 10 RCTs with 1278 children who had intractable constipation. We assessed one study as at low risk of bias across all domains. There were serious concerns about risk of bias in six studies. One study compared the injection of 160 units botulinum toxin A (n = 44) to unspecified oral stool softeners (n = 44). We are very uncertain whether botulinum toxin A injection improves treatment success (risk ratio (RR) 37.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.31 to 257.94; very low certainty evidence, downgraded due to serious concerns with risk of bias and imprecision). Frequency of defecation was reported only for the botulinum toxin A injection group (mean interval of 2.6 days). The study reported no data for the other primary outcomes. One study compared erythromycin estolate (n = 6) to placebo (n = 8). The only primary outcome reported was adverse events, which were 0 in both groups. The evidence is of very low certainty due to concerns with risk of bias and serious imprecision. One study compared 12 or 24 µg oral lubiprostone (n = 404) twice a day to placebo (n = 202) over 12 weeks. There may be little to no difference in treatment success (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.92; low certainty evidence). We also found that lubiprostone probably results in little to no difference in adverse events (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.21; moderate certainty evidence). The study reported no data for the other primary outcomes. One study compared three-weekly rectal sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate and sorbitol enemas (n = 51) to 0.5 g/kg/day polyethylene glycol laxatives (n = 51) over a 52-week period. We are very uncertain whether rectal sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate and sorbitol enemas improve treatment success (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.14; very low certainty evidence, downgraded due to serious concerns with risk of bias and imprecision). Results of defecation frequency per week was reported only as modelled means using a linear mixed model. The study reported no data for the other primary outcomes. One study compared biofeedback therapy (n = 12) to no intervention (n = 12). We are very uncertain whether biofeedback therapy improves symptom resolution (RR 2.50, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.79; very low certainty evidence, downgraded due to serious concerns with risk of bias and imprecision). The study reported no data for the other primary outcomes. One study compared 20 minutes of intrarectal electromotive botulinum toxin A using 2800 Hz frequency and botulinum toxin A dose 10 international units/kg (n = 30) to 10 international units/kg botulinum toxin A injection (n = 30). We are very uncertain whether intrarectal electromotive botulinum toxin A improves symptom resolution (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.22; very low certainty evidence) or if it increases the frequency of defecation (mean difference (MD) 0.00, 95% CI -1.87 to 1.87; very low certainty evidence). We are also very uncertain whether intrarectal electromotive botulinum toxin A has an improved safety profile (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.00; very low certainty evidence). The evidence for these results is of very low certainty due to serious concerns with risk of bias and imprecision. The study did not report data on treatment success. One study compared the injection of 60 units botulinum toxin A (n = 21) to myectomy of the internal anal sphincter (n = 21). We are very uncertain whether botulinum toxin A injection improves treatment success (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.34; very low certainty evidence). No adverse events were recorded. The study reported no data for the other primary outcomes. One study compared 0.04 mg/kg oral prucalopride (n = 107) once daily to placebo (n = 108) over eight weeks. Oral prucalopride probably results in little or no difference in defecation frequency (MD 0.50, 95% CI -0.06 to 1.06; moderate certainty evidence); treatment success (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.72; moderate certainty evidence); and adverse events (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.39; moderate certainty evidence). The study did not report data on symptom resolution. One study compared transcutaneous electrical stimulation to sham stimulation, and another study compared dietitian-prescribed Mediterranean diet with written instructions versus written instructions. These studies did not report any of our predefined primary outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We identified low to moderate certainty evidence that oral lubiprostone may result in little to no difference in treatment success and adverse events compared to placebo. Based on moderate certainty evidence, there is probably little or no difference between oral prucalopride and placebo in defecation frequency, treatment success, or adverse events. For all other comparisons, the certainty of the evidence for our predefined primary outcomes is very low due to serious concerns with study limitations and imprecision. Consequently, no robust conclusions could be drawn.

Efficacy of lubiprostone for functional constipation treatment in adolescents and children: Randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Adolescent and pediatric functional constipation (FC) is a common clinical problem. Currently, data on lubiprostone for the treatment of pediatric FC are scarce. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of lubiprostone in the treatment of pediatric FC. METHODS: In a single-blinded, randomized controlled study, we included 280 patients aged 8-18 years with FC. Patients were randomized either to a weight-based lubiprostone dose (n = 140) or conventional laxatives (n = 140), including lactulose, bisacodyl, or sodium picosulfate, for 12 weeks, followed by 4 weeks posttreatment follow-up. RESULTS: Improvement in constipation was achieved in 128 (91.4%) patients in the lubiprostone group, and in 48 (34.3%) patients of the conventional therapy group (p < 0.001) and was sustained after treatment discontinuation. One quarter of the lubiprostone group experienced the first spontaneous bowel motion within 48 h after dose initiation. A total of 75.7% of the lubiprostone group could achieve and sustain Bristol stool form of 3 or 4 during the last 4 weeks of therapy and through the 4 weeks of follow-up versus 50 (35.7%) patients in the conventional therapy group (p < 0.001). No life-threatening adverse drug reactions were encountered, and no treatment-related discontinuation. Mild self-limited colicky abdominal pain and headache were the most prevalent side effects in the lubiprostone group. CONCLUSIONS: Lubiprostone is an effective and well-tolerated pharmacotherapy for youthful age and pediatric age groups, which may alter the paradigm of pediatric FC treatment.

Comparative profiles of lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat for chronic constipation: a systematic literature review with meta-analysis and number needed to treat/harm.

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy, safety, patient symptoms, and quality-of-life (QoL) of lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat as treatment for chronic constipation (CC). DESIGN: Systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis (MA). Literature searches were conducted on PubMed and Embase using the Ovid platform. METHODS: SLR including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies was conducted to identify the overall efficacy and safety of lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat. Thereafter, MA was performed using only RCTs. The number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) analyses were additionally conducted. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was efficacy regarding change in spontaneous bowel movements. Secondary outcomes included safety, constipation-related symptoms, and QoL. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria for the SLR: 17 RCTs, 4 observational studies, and 3 single-arm trials. Feasibility assessment for the MA resulted in 14 studies available for safety data analysis, and 8 available for efficacy analysis, respectively. Three drugs showed similar efficacy in the MA and NNT analysis. However, the NNH analysis revealed distinct safety profiles: lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat were linked to the highest risk of nausea, diarrhea, and abdominal pain, respectively. CONCLUSION: The current study provides an updated overview of the efficacy, safety, patient symptoms, and QoL of the three drugs with different mechanisms of action for CC treatment.The findings could help physicians adopt an individualized approach for treating patients with CC in clinical practice.

Recommendations for the management of opioid-induced constipation - how to improve usability in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid-induced constipation remains undertreated despite effective and safe treatment options exists. Previous guidelines have only been partially effective in improving management, possibly due to their complexity, and studies suggest that a simple setup of concise and behaviorally-orientated steps improves usability. AREAS COVERED: This article introduces the concept of opioid-induced constipation and provides an overview of existing guidelines in this field. We also propose simplified recommendations for managing opioid-induced constipation, derived from a synthesis of current guidelines and the principles of optimal guideline design theory. EXPERT OPINION: Despite standard treatment with laxatives and fluid intake in patients with opioid-induced constipation, escalation of treatment is often needed where µ-opioid receptor antagonists or newer medications such as lubiprostone, linaclotide, or prucalopride are used. Previous guidelines have not been used sufficiently and thus management of the condition is often insufficient. We therefore propose simplified recommendations to management, which we believe can come into broader use. It was validated in primary care for credibility, clarity, relevance, usability, and overall benefit. We believe that this initiative can lead to better management of the substantial proportion of patients suffering from side effects of opioids.

Lubiprostone plus polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) versus PEG-ELS for bowel preparation in chronic constipation: a randomized controlled trial.

Colonoscopy is considered the standard procedure for early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer. Adequate bowel cleansing is an important determinant of the efficacy of colonoscopy screening. Currently, there is no standard method of bowel preparation for patients with chronic constipation. The aim was to access the rate of adequate bowel cleansing achieved using split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) plus lubiprostone in comparison with split-dose PEG-ELS alone. A single-centre, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Seventy-eight constipated patients aged 18-75 years who were indicated for colonoscopy in the gastroenterology unit of Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, between February 2020 and February 2021 were randomly allocated to receive either split-dose PEG-ELS in combination with lubiprostone (N = 39) or split-dose PEG-ELS alone (N = 39) before colonoscopy. Adequate bowel cleansing was defined as an Ottawa bowel preparation score ≤ 7. The rate of adequate bowel cleansing was comparable between the PEG-ELS plus lubiprostone group and the PEG-ELS alone group (50% vs. 52.9%, p value = 0.81) with a relative risk of 1.13 (95% CI = 0.43-2.91). There were no significant differences in adenoma detection rate (41.2% vs. 35.3%, p value = 0.62), adverse events, acceptance, compliance, or patient satisfaction between the 2 groups. No additional benefit to successful bowel preparation was achieved by the combination of lubiprostone and PEG-ELS in chronic constipation patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Artificial intelligence-assisted repurposing of lubiprostone alleviates tubulointerstitial fibrosis.

Tubulointerstitial fibrosis (TIF) is the most prominent cause which leads to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal failure. Despite extensive research, there have been many clinical trial failures, and there is currently no effective treatment to cure renal fibrosis. This demonstrates the necessity of more effective therapies and better preclinical models to screen potential drugs for TIF. In this study, we investigated the antifibrotic effect of the machine learning-based repurposed drug, lubiprostone, validated through an advanced proximal tubule on a chip system and in vivo UUO mice model. Lubiprostone significantly downregulated TIF biomarkers including connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), extracellular matrix deposition (Fibronectin and collagen), transforming growth factor (TGF-ß) downstream signaling markers especially, Smad-2/3, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP2/9), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), EMT and JAK/STAT-3 pathway expression in the proximal tubule on a chip model and UUO model compared to the conventional 2D culture. These findings suggest that the proximal tubule on a chip model is a more physiologically relevant model for studying and identifying potential biomarkers for fibrosis compared to conventional in vitro 2D culture and alternative of an animal model. In conclusion, the high throughput Proximal tubule-on-chip system shows improved in vivo-like function and indicates the potential utility for renal fibrosis drug screening. Additionally, repurposed Lubiprostone shows an effective potency to treat TIF via inhibiting 3 major profibrotic signaling pathways such as TGFß/Smad, JAK/STAT, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and restores kidney function.

American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) is a common disorder associated with significant impairment in quality of life. This clinical practice guideline, jointly developed by the American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology, aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of CIC in adults. METHODS: The American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that conducted systematic reviews of the following agents: fiber, osmotic laxatives (polyethylene glycol, magnesium oxide, lactulose), stimulant laxatives (bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate, senna), secretagogues (lubiprostone, linaclotide, plecanatide), and serotonin type 4 agonist (prucalopride). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework to assess the certainty of evidence for each intervention. The Evidence to Decision framework was used to develop clinical recommendations based on the balance between the desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 10 recommendations for the pharmacological management of CIC in adults. Based on available evidence, the panel made strong recommendations for the use of polyethylene glycol, sodium picosulfate, linaclotide, plecanatide, and prucalopride for CIC in adults. Conditional recommendations were made for the use of fiber, lactulose, senna, magnesium oxide, and lubiprostone. DISCUSSION: This document provides a comprehensive outline of the various over-the-counter and prescription pharmacological agents available for the treatment of CIC. The guidelines are meant to provide a framework for approaching the management of CIC; clinical providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences as well as medication cost and availability. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to help guide future research opportunities and enhance the care of patients with chronic constipation.

American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) is a common disorder associated with significant impairment in quality of life. This clinical practice guideline, jointly developed by the American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology, aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of CIC in adults. METHODS: The American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that conducted systematic reviews of the following agents: fiber, osmotic laxatives (polyethylene glycol, magnesium oxide, lactulose), stimulant laxatives (bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate, senna), secretagogues (lubiprostone, linaclotide, plecanatide), and serotonin type 4 agonist (prucalopride). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework to assess the certainty of evidence for each intervention. The Evidence to Decision framework was used to develop clinical recommendations based on the balance between the desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 10 recommendations for the pharmacological management of CIC in adults. Based on available evidence, the panel made strong recommendations for the use of polyethylene glycol, sodium picosulfate, linaclotide, plecanatide, and prucalopride for CIC in adults. Conditional recommendations were made for the use of fiber, lactulose, senna, magnesium oxide, and lubiprostone. DISCUSSION: This document provides a comprehensive outline of the various over-the-counter and prescription pharmacological agents available for the treatment of CIC. The guidelines are meant to provide a framework for approaching the management of CIC; clinical providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences as well as medication cost and availability. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to help guide future research opportunities and enhance the care of patients with chronic constipation.

Alleviation of cholestatic liver injury and intestinal permeability by lubiprostone treatment in bile duct ligated rats: role of intestinal FXR and tight junction proteins claudin-1, claudin-2, and occludin.

Gut barrier disintegrity and endotoxin translocation to the liver and systemic circulation are serious clinical complications associated with the stoppage of intestinal bile flow. There is no precise pharmacological option to prevent increased intestinal permeability after bile duct ligation (BDL). Lubiprostone, a chloride channel-2 agonist, has been shown to accelerate restoration of epithelial barrier dysfunction caused by injury, but the exact mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of lubiprostone on intestine barrier integrity remain unknown. Here, we assessed the beneficial effect of lubiprostone on cholestasis caused by BDL and relevant mechanisms. Male rats were subjected to BDL for 21 days. Seven days after BDL induction, lubiprostone was administered twice daily (10 µg/kg of body weight). Intestinal permeability was assessed through measurements of serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS) concentration. Real-time PCR was conducted to assess expression of intestinal claudin-1 occludin and FXR genes, which are important in preserving the intestinal epithelial barrier integrity, as well as claudin-2 being involved in a leaky gut barrier. Histopathological alterations were also monitored for liver injury. Lubiprostone significantly decreased BDL-induced systemic LPS elevation in rats. BDL induced a significant reduction in FXR, occludin, and claudin-1 genes expression, while increased claudin-2 expression in rat colon. Treatment with lubiprostone significantly restored expression of these genes to the control values. BDL also increased the level of hepatic enzymes ALT, ALP, AST, and total bilirubin, while lubiprostone could preserve the hepatic enzymes and total bilirubin in the treated BDL rats. Lubiprostone also caused a significant reduction in BDL-induced liver fibrosis and intestinal damage in rats. Our results suggest that lubiprostone favorably prevents BDL-induced alterations in intestinal epithelial barrier integrity possibly via modulating intestinal FXRs and tight junction gene expression.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of the Lubiprostone Capsule in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

A pharmacokinetic (PK) study and a bioequivalence (BE) study were conducted to investigate the PK characteristics and safety of lubiprostone in healthy Chinese subjects and to evaluate the BE between the test and the reference drugs. The PK study consisted of a fasting state cohort (a single dose of 24 µg of lubiprostone), a 2-period crossover fasting and fed state cohort (a single dose of 48 µg of lubiprostone), and a multiple-dose cohort (24 µg of lubiprostone twice daily). The BE study was a single-dose, 2-treatment, 4-period, replicated crossover study. The plasma concentration of 15-OH-lubiprostone (M3) was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The PK parameters were calculated using the noncompartment model with Phoenix WinNonlin. After a single dose of 24 ug of lubiprostone, the main PK parameters of M3 were 49.2 pg/mL, 74.0 h/pg/mL, and 1.1 hours for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), area under the plasma concentration time curve from time 0 to the last time point, and t1/2 , respectively. The main PK parameters of M3 showed dose-proportional characteristics in the dose range of 24-48 µg. Food affects the PK parameters of M3. Compared to the fasting state, time to maximum plasma concentration was delayed, Cmax decreased slightly, while AUC increased significantly under the fed state. The test and reference products had similar PK parameters and were bioequivalent in the fed state.

Pharmacotherapeutic efficacy on noninvasive fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fibrosis impacts long-term outcomes among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Due to well-documented flaws associated with liver biopsy, there has been a recent emphasis on prioritizing noninvasive testing over liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review and frequentist random effects network meta-analysis was performed among randomized controlled trials reporting pharmacologic intervention in NAFLD. The primary endpoint was the absolute change in liver stiffness measurement (LSM) via elastography. Secondary endpoints included changes in noninvasive serologic tests including APRI, fibrosis-4 index, NAFLD fibrosis score, enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) and FibroTest (FibroSure in the USA). RESULTS: Forty-five randomized controlled trials enrolling 6932 patients were identified for this network meta-analysis. Across the primary endpoint, firsocostat, semaglutide, montelukast, cilofexor plus firsocostat, obeticholic acid and diacerein (change in LSM via vibration controlled transient elastography), in addition to lubiprostone and pemafibrate (change in LSM via magnetic resonance elastography) were found to be the most effective and statistically significant treatment interventions. Similarly, the following interventions were determined to be most effective as compared to placebo among secondary endpoints: saroglitazar, lubiprostone, and obeticholic acid (change in APRI); saroglitazar, semaglutide, firsocostat and cilofexor plus firsocostat (change in ELF); obeticholic acid and belapectin [change in FibroTest/FibroSure]. CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic review and network meta-analysis reporting pharmacologic efficacy in the progression of fibrosis based on noninvasive testing among patients with NAFLD. Semaglutide, obeticholic acid, firsocostat, cilofexor plus firsocostat and lubiprostone were found to be the most effective treatments based on their consistent efficacy reproduced across multiple endpoints, both via elastography and noninvasive blood tests.

Lubiprostone significantly represses fatty liver diseases via induction of mucin and HDL release in mice.

AIMS: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a metabolic disorder with increasing prevalence over the last decade. Leakage of intestinal bacteria is one of the main causes that can drive the progression of NAFLD. The laxative drug lubiprostone has been reported to enhance gut barrier function. In the present study, we aimed to clarify effectiveness and mechanisms of lubiprostone as a therapeutic agent to ameliorate NAFLD. MAIN METHODS: C57BL/6 wild-type mice were fed with high-fat diet (HFD) to induce NAFLD. Two different dosages of lubiprostone and obetichoic acid were orally administered for five weeks. After sacrifice, liver injuries and intestinal physiology were evaluated. KEY FINDINGS: Oral treatment of lubiprostone effectively attenuated features of HFD-induced NAFLD including liver weight, plasma liver injury markers, and hepatic steatosis. Bacterial burden in the liver was reduced after oral delivery of lubiprostone. Lubiprostone improved intestinal permeability through development of colonic mucus. Notably, levels of portal HDL cholesterol, a portal endotoxin neutralizer, were elevated by high-dosage treatment of lubiprostone. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings provide new insight that blockade of leaked bacterial endotoxin via lubiprostone treatment could be a therapeutic strategy to repress the development of NAFLD.

Development and validation of a highly sensitive and selective LC-MS/MS method for the determination of 15-hydroxylubiprostone in human plasma: application to a pharmacokinetic study in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Lubiprostone, a derivative of prostaglandin E1, is the first chemical-type constipation treatment approved by FDA. Lubiprostone has low systemic exposure after oral administration. Therefore, it is recommended that 15-hydroxylubiprostone, which is a dominant active metabolite of lubiprostone, be used as the pharmacokinetic evaluation indicator. Due to the microdosage of the lubiprostone capsules, it is difficult to develop a highly sensitive bioanalytical method for 15-hydroxylubiprostone.In this study, a highly sensitive and selective liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method has been established and fully validated for the quantification of 15-hydroxylubiprostone in human plasma, and the validated bioanalytical method has been applied to a pharmacokinetic study of lubiprostone capsules successfully.The pharmacokinetics of 15-hydroxylubiprostone were observed after fed administration in healthy Chinese volunteers. The Cmax and AUC0-t were 75.8 ± 57.6 pg/mL and 222 ± 68.0 pg·h/mL for 15-hydroxylubiprostone.This study investigated the pharmacokinetic properties of 15-hydroxylubiprostone under fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers and would provide clinical guidance for the application and further development of lubiprostone capsules.

Bowel preparation using 2-L split-dose polyethylene glycol regimen plus lubiprostone versus 4-L split-dose polyethylene glycol regimen: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a standard procedure for evaluating colon diseases and screening for colorectal cancer, and bowel cleanliness prior to colonoscopy is key. The aim of this study was to compare the bowel cleansing efficacy of low-volume (2 L) split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus single-dose (24 µg) lubiprostone (LB) and high-volume (4 L) split-dose PEG. METHODS: Patients scheduled to undergo outpatient colonoscopy between December 2019 and June 2021 at Rajavithi Hospital were enrolled and randomized into two groups: 2 L PEG + LB or 4 L PEG. Colon cleanliness was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) by reviewing images of the colon after completion of colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes comprised cecal intubation rate, procedure time, withdrawal time, polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, patient satisfaction, compliance (based on complete ingestion of bowel preparation regimen), willingness to repeat the preparation regimen, and associated adverse events. RESULTS: One hundred and forty patients were included, with 70 in each group. The mean total and segment-specific BBPS scores were not significantly different between groups. However, the rate of adequate bowel preparation was significantly higher in the 2 L PEG + LB group than the 4 L PEG group (100% [95% CI 94.6-100] versus 88.4% [95% CI 78.4-94.9], p = 0.004) in the per-protocol analysis. Colonic polyps were the most common finding. The polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and all secondary outcomes were statistically similar in the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of 2 L split-dose PEG plus LB improves bowel cleanliness (based on BBPS scores) to a comparable degree to the standard 4 L split-dose PEG, without additional adverse events and with a lower PEG volume.

Analysis of the impact on efficacy of lubiprostone dose reduction to manage adverse events in the treatment of chronic constipation in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between two doses of lubiprostone in patients with chronic constipation (CC), to assess whether dose reduction affects efficacy. METHODS: This open-label exploratory study involved 146 patients with CC treated initially with lubiprostone 24 mcg twice daily for a planned duration of 4 weeks. Patients who experienced adverse events (AEs) had their dose reduced to 12 mcg twice daily (for 4 weeks). RESULTS: Lubiprostone dose was unchanged in 104 patients and reduced due to AEs in 42 patients. Significant differences in the mean number of bowel movements per week favored the dose-reduced group at Week 1 and end of follow-up. No between-group differences were observed over time for mean number of days per week with bowel movements or mean Bristol Stool Form Scale scores. Symptoms of abdominal bloating, strained defecation, and sensation of incomplete evacuation improved in both groups. Before dose reduction, nausea was reported by 64.3% and diarrhea by 45.2% of patients in the dose-reduced group; after dose reduction, no patients reported nausea and one patient reported diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Dose reduction of lubiprostone reduced the incidence of AEs, with no compromise to efficacy, and may be a suitable approach for patients who develop AEs during treatment.

AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Pharmacological Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction associated with significant disease burden. This American Gastroenterological Association guideline is intended to support practitioners in decisions about the use of medications for the pharmacological management of IBS-C and is an update of a prior technical review and guideline. METHODS: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. The technical review panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients and conducted an evidence review of the following agents: tenapanor, plecanatide, linaclotide, tegaserod, lubiprostone, polyethylene glycol laxatives, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and antispasmodics. The Guideline Panel reviewed the evidence and used the Evidence-to-Decision Framework to develop recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The panel agreed on 9 recommendations for the management of patients with IBS-C. The panel made a strong recommendation for linaclotide (high certainty) and conditional recommendations for tenapanor, plecanatide, tegaserod, and lubiprostone (moderate certainty), polyethylene glycol laxatives, tricyclic antidepressants, and antispasmodics (low certainty). The panel made a conditional recommendation against the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (low certainty).

Rifaximin and lubiprostone mitigate liver fibrosis development by repairing gut barrier function in diet-induced rat steatohepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Although gut-derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS) affects the progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) pathogenesis, few studies have focused on this relationship to develop treatments for NASH. AIMS: To explore the effects of combination with rifaximin and lubiprostone on NASH liver fibrosis through the modulation of gut barrier function. METHODS: To induce steatohepatitis, F344 rats were fed a choline-deficient l-amino acid-defined (CDAA) diet for 12 weeks and received oral administration of rifaximin and/or lubiprostone. Histological, molecular, and fecal microbial analyses were performed. Barrier function in Caco-2 cells were assessed by in vitro assays. RESULTS: Combination rifaximin/lubiprostone treatment significantly suppressed macrophage expansion, proinflammatory responses, and liver fibrosis in CDAA-fed rats by blocking hepatic translocation of LPS and activation of toll-like receptor 4 signaling. Rifaximin and lubiprostone improved intestinal permeability via restoring tight junction proteins (TJPs) with the intestinal activation of pregnane X receptor and chloride channel-2, respectively. Moreover, this combination increased the abundance of Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, and Faecalibacterium as well as decreased that of Veillonella resulting in an increase of fecal short-chain fatty acids and a decrease of intestinal sialidase activity. Both agents also directly suppressed the LPS-induced barrier dysfunction and depletion of TJPs in Caco-2 cells. CONCLUSION: The combination of rifaximin and lubiprostone may provide a novel strategy for treating NASH-related fibrosis.

Real-World Treatment Strategies to Improve Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation and Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation.

Chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation are complex, overlapping conditions. Although multiple guidelines have informed healthcare providers on appropriate treatment options for patients with chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, little direction is offered on treatment selection. First-line treatment options usually include fiber and over-the-counter osmotic laxatives; however, these are insufficient for many individuals. When these options fail, prescription secretagogues (plecanatide, linaclotide, lubiprostone, and tenapanor [pending commercial availability]), or serotonergic agents (prucalopride and tegaserod) are generally preferred. Individuals experiencing concurrent abdominal pain and/or bloating may experience greater overall improvements from prescription therapies because these agents have been proven to reduce concurrent abdominal and bowel symptoms. Should initial prescription treatments fail, retrying past treatment options (if not adequately trialed initially), combining agents from alternative classes, or use of adjunctive therapies may be considered. Given the broad spectrum of available agents, therapy should be tailored by mutual decision-making between the patient and practitioner. Overall, patients need to be actively monitored and managed to maximize clinical outcomes.

Receptor-mediated activation of CFTR via prostaglandin signaling pathways in the airway.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease caused by mutations of the gene encoding a cAMP-activated Cl- channel, the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). CFTR modulator therapies consist of small-molecule drugs that rescue mutant CFTR. Regimens of single or combinations of CFTR modulators still rely on endogenous levels of cAMP to regulate CFTR activity. We investigated CFTR activation by the natural mediator prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and lubiprostone (a Food and Drug Administration-approved drug known to target prostaglandin receptors) and tested the hypothesis that receptor-mediated CFTR activators can be used in combination with currently available CFTR modulators to increase function of mutant CFTR. Primary-cultured airway epithelia were assayed in Ussing chambers. Experimental CFTR activators and established CFTR modulators were applied for 24 h and/or acutely and analyzed for their effect on CFTR activity as measured by changes in short-circuit current (ISC). In non-CF airway epithelia, acute application of lubiprostone and PGE2 activated CFTR to the levels comparable to forskolin (Fsk). Pretreatment (24 h) with antagonists to prostaglandin receptors EP2 and EP4 abolished the ability of lubiprostone to acutely activate CFTR. In F508del homozygous airway epithelia pretreated with the triple combination of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor (ELEXA/TEZ/IVA; i.e., Trikafta), acute application of lubiprostone was able to maximally activate CFTR. Prolonged (24 h) cotreatment of F508del homozygous epithelia with ELEXA/TEZ/IVA and lubiprostone increased acute CFTR activation by ∼60% compared with the treatment with ELEXA/TEZ/IVA alone. This work establishes the feasibility of targeting prostaglandin receptors to activate CFTR on the airway epithelia and demonstrates that cotreatment with lubiprostone can further restore modulator-rescued CFTR.