RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The demographics of plastic surgeons and plastic surgery trainees are changing, reflecting an increase in the diversity of medical school graduates. The authors investigated the gender diversity of speakers at several plastic surgery conferences and evaluated temporal trends over a 10-year period. METHODS: The following societies' conferences and years were included based on the conference agendas available for review: American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Plastic Surgery Research Council, American Association of Plastic Surgeons, Northeastern Society of Plastic Surgeons, and American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery. Differences in the average amount of time spoken were analyzed using an independent one-tailed t test. RESULTS: The number of female speakers and the time allotted to speak increased for all conferences. There was not a consistent difference in the amount of time individual men and women were allotted to speak. Across the five conferences, there was no consistent relationship found between years since board certification and female participation in conference. Gender diversity among speakers at plastic surgery conferences has not kept pace with the increase in female plastic surgery trainees because those who are selected to speak are overwhelmingly men. The hypothesis that a paucity of female speakers reflects the relatively shorter duration of career experience of female plastic surgeons was not supported by these findings. CONCLUSION: It is imperative that conferences increase the participation of women and strive toward more accurately reflecting the burgeoning role that female surgeons have in the field at present and will have in the future.
Asunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Equidad de Género/tendencias , Liderazgo , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Sociedades Médicas/tendencias , Cirujanos/tendencias , Cirugía Plástica/tendencias , Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Sexismo/tendencias , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Cirujanos/organización & administración , Cirugía Plástica/organización & administración , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
We aimed to analyze the representativeness of women surgeons in academic and leadership positions in Brazil. We investigated women representativeness across surgical departments of 25 Brazilian universities (2020); across boards of 10 Brazilian surgical societies (2020), and, as speakers, in 281 surgical events (Jan-2014 to Dec-2020). From 383 individuals in university departments, 43 (11.2 %) were women (p < 0.001). Only three universities had women as department chairs. From 163 positions in surgical societies, only 14 positions (8.6 %) were held by women (p < 0.001). The underrepresentation is worse in prestigious positions (presidency and vice-presidency), in which only 1 (5 %) were women. In 281 surgical events, there were 6686 speakers, of which only 886 (13.3 %) of these were women (p < 0.001). Further studies are needed to elucidate the possible causes for the gender gap in these scenarios in Brazil, so as to implement effective strategies to improve gender representativeness in surgery in the country.
Asunto(s)
Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Liderazgo , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Sexismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Cirujanos/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
A truly inclusive organization cultivates a sense of belonging and value in its members, realizing their contributions are vital to its success. Acknowledging and then dismantling exclusionary systems and policies are essential to creating environments grounded in diversity and equity. This process requires intentionality, accountability, and swift action on the part of leadership. Additionally, the role of organizational accountability, through tracking performance metrics, gauging employee satisfaction and engagement, and routinely assessing identified goals and objectives, is critical to sustaining inclusivity. In this article, we present a review of the literature and offers recommendations to build and sustain an inclusive environment.
Asunto(s)
Liderazgo , Cultura Organizacional , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Facultades de Medicina/organización & administración , Inclusión Social , Compromiso Laboral , Femenino , Humanos , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Facultades de Medicina/tendenciasAsunto(s)
Movilidad Laboral , Miembro de Comité , Docentes Médicos/organización & administración , Gastroenterólogos/organización & administración , Liderazgo , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Sociedades Científicas/organización & administración , Educación Médica , Femenino , Gastroenterólogos/educación , Gastroenterología/educación , Rol de Género , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Mujeres TrabajadorasRESUMEN
Importance: The number of female speakers at American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) conferences should ideally be consistent with the number of women entering head and neck surgery fellowships to ensure gender equity in the field. Yet the presence of women speakers at the annual AHNS meetings, which is specific to the field of head and neck cancer, endocrine and microvascular reconstructive surgery, has yet to be studied. Objective: To determine whether the proportion of female speakers at the AHNS has increased in a manner consistent with the numbers of women entering fellowships since 2007. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study assessed 13 final meeting programs from AHNS national/international conferences from 2007 to 2019. The number of male and female participants in different roles throughout the meeting were retrospectively tracked. Participants were male and female speakers at AHNS national/international conferences who took part in the roles of scientific session presenter, scientific session moderator, expert panelist, miscellaneous moderator, and named lecturers/keynote speaker. Gender of the speaker was determined by searching names on the internet and using available published pronouns. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number of speaking opportunities for men and women in different roles from 2007 to 2019 as well as number of men and women entering AHNS fellowships since 2007 and new active AHNS members since 2012. Results: In this qualitative study, from 2007 to 2019, 4059 speakers were identified. Of these speakers, 902 (22%) were women and 3157 (78%) were men. Overall, there was a strong correlation between increasing years and number of women speakers from 2007 to 2019 (ρ = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.72-0.78). There were 2096 invited speaking roles that excluded research presentations, of which 400 were offered to female participants (19.1%) across the study period. There were 131 different women that made up all 400 of the opportunities that were offered to women in the years surveyed. There was a strong correlation in the proportion of women as presenters for oral abstracts, expert panelists, and miscellaneous moderators between the years but no correlation in scientific session moderators and named lecturers/keynote speakers. Of the 45 named lecturers/keynote speakers in the programs tracked, only 2 were women. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, from 2007 to 2019, the presence of women at ANHS has increased overall, reflecting the changing demographic characteristics of those entering in head and neck oncology and microvascular surgery fellowships. However, a strong disparity continues to exist for preeminent speaking opportunities.
Asunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Cabeza/cirugía , Cuello/cirugía , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Sexismo/tendencias , Sociedades Médicas/tendencias , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/tendencias , Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Becas/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Investigación Cualitativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/organización & administración , Habla , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Women are under-represented as leaders of cardiovascular randomized controlled trials, representing 1 in 10 lead authors of cardiovascular trials published in high-impact journals. Although the proportion of cardiovascular specialists who are women has increased in recent years, the proportion of cardiovascular clinical trialists who are women has not. This gap, underpinned by systemic sexism, has not been adequately addressed. The benefits of diverse randomized controlled trial leadership extend to patients and professionals. In this position statement, we present strategies adopted by some organizations to end gender inequality in research leadership. We offer an actionable roadmap for early-career researchers, scientists, academic institutions, professional societies, trial sponsors, and journals to follow, with the goal of harnessing the strength of women and under-represented groups as research leaders and facilitating a just culture in the cardiovascular clinical trial enterprise.
Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/organización & administración , Liderazgo , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Sexismo/etnología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Prior work suggests women surgical role models attract more female medical students into surgical training. We investigate recent trends of women in surgical society leadership and national conference moderator and plenary speaker roles. METHODS: Gender distribution was surveyed at 15 major surgical societies and 14 conferences from 2014 to 2018 using publicly reported data. Roles were categorized as leadership (executive council), moderator, or plenary speaker. Data were cross-checked from online profiles and by contacting societies. Logistic regression with Huber-White clustering by society was utilized to evaluate proportions of women in each role over time and determine associations between the proportion of women in executive leadership, and scientific session moderators and plenary speakers. RESULTS: The proportion of leadership positions held by women increased slightly from 2014 to 2018 (20.6%-26.6%, P = 0.23), as did the proportion of moderators (26.2%-30.6%, P = 0.027) and plenary speakers (26.2%-30.9%, P = 0.058). The proportion of women in each role varied significantly across societies (all P < 0.001): leaders (range 0.0%-52.0%), moderators (12.5%-58.8%), and plenary speakers (11.3%-60.0%). Three patterns of change were observed: eight societies (53.3%) demonstrated increases in representation of women over time, four societies (26.6%) showed stable moderate-to-good gender balance, and three societies (20.0%) had consistent underrepresentation of women. CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in the representation of women at the leadership level of national surgical societies and participating at national surgical conferences as moderators and plenary speakers. Over the past 5 years some societies have achieved advances in gender equity, but many societies still have substantial room for improvement.
Asunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Equidad de Género , Liderazgo , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Sexismo/tendencias , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/organización & administración , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Sociedades Médicas/tendencias , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/tendencias , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diversidad Cultural , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/organización & administración , Nefrólogos/organización & administración , Nefrología/organización & administración , Asistencia Sanitaria Culturalmente Competente/organización & administración , Difusión de Innovaciones , Equidad de Género , Homofobia/prevención & control , Humanos , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Racismo/prevención & control , Sexismo/prevención & control , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Inclusión Social , Mujeres TrabajadorasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several studies have highlighted the disparities in gender equity that exist in different medical specialties. The COVID-19 pandemic has further heightened the inequity faced by female physicians as they are challenged by increasing household and childcare duties in addition to their professional responsibilities. Given these hurdles, fewer women than men have published in various medical disciplines. In this brief report, we wanted to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the academic output of female physicians and researchers in transfusion medicine. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We compared all articles in four transfusion medicine journals published from January 1 to July 31, 2019 with the same time period in 2020. Overall, 1024 articles were reviewed for whether they included women as first or senior authors. RESULTS: Overall, women were first authors in 45.9% (n = 458) of all publications and senior authors in 35% (n = 356) of all publications. There was a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of women as first authors between 2019 (49.1%) and 2020 (42.7%) (p = .04). There was no significant change in the percentage of women as senior authors between 2019 (35.4%) and 2020 (35.5%) (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to other medical specialties, the COVID-19 pandemic has further increased the disparities faced by female researchers in transfusion medicine as evidenced by a decrease in publications with women as first authors.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , COVID-19/epidemiología , Médicos Mujeres , Publicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Transfusional , Academias e Institutos/organización & administración , Academias e Institutos/estadística & datos numéricos , Bibliometría , Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , Investigación Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Eficiencia , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina , Pandemias , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Publicaciones/tendencias , Investigadores/organización & administración , Investigadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigadores/tendencias , Factores Sexuales , Medicina Transfusional/organización & administración , Medicina Transfusional/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Transfusional/tendenciasAsunto(s)
Competencia Cultural , Diversidad Cultural , Equidad de Género , Médicos Mujeres , Racismo/prevención & control , Sexismo/prevención & control , Inclusión Social , Cirujanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Comités Consultivos , Movilidad Laboral , Competencia Cultural/organización & administración , Educación Médica , Humanos , Liderazgo , Cultura Organizacional , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Sociedades Médicas , Cirujanos/educación , Cirujanos/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/organización & administración , Lugar de TrabajoRESUMEN
Diversity, equity, and inclusion represent interconnected goals meant to ensure that all individuals, regardless of their innate identity characteristics, feel welcomed and valued among their peers. Equity is achieved when all individuals have equal access to leadership and career advancement opportunities as well as fair compensation for their work. It is well-known that the unique backgrounds and perspectives contributed by a diverse workforce strengthen and improve medical organizations overall. The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) is committed to supporting the highest quality leadership, patient care, surgical education, and societal recommendations through promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion within the SVS. The overarching goal of this document is to provide specific context and guidance for enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion within the SVS as well as setting the tone for conduct and processes beyond the SVS, within other national and regional vascular surgery organizations and practice settings.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Cultural , Diversidad Cultural , Equidad de Género , Médicos Mujeres , Racismo/prevención & control , Sexismo/prevención & control , Inclusión Social , Cirujanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Comités Consultivos , Movilidad Laboral , Competencia Cultural/organización & administración , Educación Médica , Femenino , Humanos , Liderazgo , Masculino , Cultura Organizacional , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Sociedades Médicas , Cirujanos/educación , Cirujanos/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/organización & administración , Lugar de TrabajoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Creating a diverse workforce is paramount to the success of the surgical field. A diverse workforce allows us to meet the health needs of an increasingly diverse population and to bring new ideas to spur technical innovation. The purpose of this study was to assess trends in workforce diversity within vascular surgery (VS) and general surgery (GS) as compared with orthopedic surgery (OS)-a specialty that instituted a formal diversity initiative over a decade ago. METHODS: Data on the trainee pool for VS (fellowships and integrated residencies), GS, and OS were obtained from the U.S. Graduate Medical Education reports for 1999 through 2017. Medical student demographic data were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges U.S. medical school enrollment reports. The representation of surgical trainee populations (female, Hispanic, and black) was normalized by their representation in medical school. We also performed the χ2 test to compare proportions of residents over dichotomized time periods (1999-2005 and 2013-2017) as well as a more sensitive trend of proportions test. RESULTS: The proportion of female trainees increased significantly between the time periods for the three surgical disciplines examined (P < .001). Hispanic trainees also represented an increasing proportion of all three disciplines (P ≤ .001). The proportion of black trainees did not significantly change in any discipline between the two periods. Relative to their proportion in medical school, Hispanic trainees were well represented in all surgical specialties studied (normalized ratio [NR], 0.95-1.52: 0.95 OS, 1.00 GS, 1.53 VS fellowship, and 1.23 VS residency). Compared with their representation in medical school, women were under-represented as surgical trainees (NR: 0.32 OS, 0.82 GS, 0.56 VS fellowship, and 0.78 VS residency) as were black trainees (NR: 0.63 OS, 0.90 GS, 0.99 VS fellowship, and 0.81 VS residency). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were significant increases in the number of women and Hispanic trainees in these three surgical disciplines, only Hispanic trainees enter the surgical field at a rate higher than their proportion in medical school. The lack of an increase in black trainees across all specialties was particularly discouraging. Women and black trainees were under-represented in all specialties as compared with their representation in medical school. The data presented suggest potential problems with recruitment at multiple levels of the pipeline. Particular attention should be paid to increasing the pool of minority medical school graduates who are both interested in and competitive for surgical specialties.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Cultural , Diversidad Cultural , Equidad de Género , Cirugía General/tendencias , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Racismo/prevención & control , Sexismo/prevención & control , Cirujanos/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendencias , Negro o Afroamericano , Competencia Cultural/organización & administración , Femenino , Cirugía General/educación , Cirugía General/organización & administración , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/tendencias , Masculino , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/tendencias , Selección de Personal/tendencias , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Estudiantes de Medicina , Cirujanos/educación , Cirujanos/organización & administración , Factores de Tiempo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
The Hedwig van Ameringen Executive Leadership in Academic Medicine (ELAM) Program for Women is designed to promote the careers of senior female leaders in academic health care in a way that ultimately seeks to transform culture and promote gender equity far beyond the careers of its participants. In an era of increased awareness of gender inequity within academic medicine, the longevity of the ELAM program raises several important questions. First, why is such a program still needed? Second, what exactly does it do, and what has been its influence on its participants and beyond? And third, what lessons can ELAM's example provide to help guide the medical profession as it strives to promote gender equity in the field? In this Invited Commentary, the authors seek to answer these questions from the perspective of a recent program participant and the current program director. The authors review the evidence that identifies how women, even today, face accumulating disadvantage over the course of their academic careers, stemming from repeated encounters with powerful unconscious biases and stereotypes, societal expectations for a gendered division of domestic labor, and still-present overt discrimination and sexual harassment. They describe ELAM's approach, which builds the knowledge and skills of the women who participate in the program, while also intentionally raising their visibility within their home institutions so that they have opportunities to share with institutional leaders what they have learned in ways that not only promote their own careers but also support gender equity in the broader environment. The authors conclude by offering thoughts on how ELAM's model may be leveraged in the future, ideally in partnership with the numerous professional societies, funding agencies, and other organizations that are committed to accelerating the rate of progress toward gender equity at all levels of academic medicine.
Asunto(s)
Docentes Médicos/educación , Predicción , Liderazgo , Ejecutivos Médicos/educación , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Docentes Médicos/organización & administración , Femenino , Identidad de Género , Humanos , Ejecutivos Médicos/organización & administración , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de SaludRESUMEN
In this Invited Commentary, the author applies a historical lens to explore a fundamental paradox in U.S. medical education: the fact that long after women gained parity with men in matriculation to medical school, women remain highly underrepresented in leadership positions in academic medicine. The reasons for this are many and complex, but at the core are the subtle but hurtful indignities ("microinequities") experienced by women physicians and an academic culture that expects single-minded dedication to work, regardless of the costs to faculty members' personal lives. Achieving parity for women in academic leadership will require changing the culture of medical schools and teaching hospitals to correct these 2 fundamental obstacles. In recent years, many medical schools and teaching hospitals have made efforts to improve opportunities and satisfaction for women trainees and physicians, enacting reforms to improve work-life balance for all faculty. It is plausible to imagine a future in which flexible time frames to achieve tenure and promotion are universally available to both women and men, with high scholarly standards firmly maintained. If this occurs, it will represent a profound legacy for women in academic medicine, for their generations of professional sacrifice and advocacy for a more equitable culture will have changed its culture.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Docentes Médicos/organización & administración , Cultura Organizacional , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Sexismo/historia , Centros Médicos Académicos/historia , Docentes Médicos/historia , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Liderazgo , Médicos Mujeres/historiaRESUMEN
Following the establishment of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), women played a minor role as IDSA leaders, awards recipients, and presenters at the national meeting. Since the formation of the IDSA Women's Committee in 1992, women have played an increasing role in all of these domains of the Society. Two subsequent IDSA task forces have emphasized the importance of women, and other unrepresented minorities, to the success of the core missions of the Society. Ongoing efforts to maintain the presence of women and their unique talents, experiences, and understandings in the Society will sustain the strengths of IDSA.