Survival Comparisons between Breast Conservation Surgery and Mastectomy Followed by Postoperative Radiotherapy in Stage I-III Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (Seer) Program Database.

Background: This study aims to evaluate the overall and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy (RT) compared with mastectomy plus RT in resectable breast cancer. Moreover, the aim is to also identify the subgroups who benefit from BCS plus RT and establish a predictive nomogram for stage II patients. Methods: Stage I−III breast cancer patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1990 and 2016. Patients with available clinical information were split into two groups: BCS plus RT and mastectomy plus RT. Kaplan−Meier survival analysis, univariate and multivariate regression analysis, and propensity score matching were used in the study. Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated based on stratified Cox univariate regression analyses. A prognostic nomogram by multivariable Cox regression model was developed for stage II patients, and consistency index (C-index) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the accuracy of the nomogram in the training and validation set. Results: A total of 24,590 eligible patients were enrolled. The difference in overall survival (OS) and BCSS remained significant in stage II patients both before and after PSM (after PSM: OS: HR = 0.8536, p = 0.0115; BCSS: HR = 0.7803, p = 0.0013). In stage II patients, the survival advantage effect of BCS plus RT on OS and BCSS was observed in the following subgroups: any age, smaller tumor size (<1 cm), stage IIA (T2N0, T0−1N1), ER (+), and any PR status. Secondly, the C-indexes for BCSS prediction was 0.714 (95% CI 0.694−0.734). The calibration curves showed perfect agreement in both the training and validation sets. Conclusions: BCS plus RT significantly improved the survival rates for patients of stage IIA (T2N0, T0−1N1), ER (+). For stage II patients, the nomogram was a good predictor of 5-, 10-, and 15-year BCSS. Our study may help guide treatment decisions and prolong the survival of stage II breast cancer patients.

Lympho-vascular invasion impacts the prognosis in breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that breast cancer (BC) incidence, especially that of early-stage breast cancer cases continues to rise due to increased universal screening. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the main intervention for early-stage BC. Lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) is reported to influence breast cancer prognosis but its prognostic value in breast-conserving treatment is controversial. METHODS: A search was conducted on the Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE from inception to December 1st, 2021, without language restrictions, to identify studies that explored the prognosis of lympho-vascular invasion in breast-conserving surgery. Reviews of each study were conducted, and data extracted. The meta-analysis was performed with StataSE 16. Study quality assessment was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Overall, 15 studies with 21,704 patients deemed eligible for this study. Event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), distant metastases (DM), loco-regional recurrence (LRR), local recurrence (LR), breast recurrence (BR), disease specific survival (DSS), and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), were extracted from each study. We found that LVI leads to poor OS (HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.17-1.83), DM (HR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.66-2.60) and LR (HR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.54-2.61). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that early-stage BC patients with LVI-positive have poorer OS, DFS, LRR, BCSS, DM and LR following receiving BCS than those LVI-negative patients. Mastectomy, in combination with radical systemic therapies could be considered, especially in those requiring second surgery. How to change the impact of LVI on the local recurrence rate and long-term survival in patients who undergo BCS may be a valuable research direction in the future.

Characterization of Outcomes by Surgical Management of Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors Associated With Cushing Syndrome.

Importance: Ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion from lung tumors causing Cushing syndrome are associated with high rates of morbidity. Optimal management remains obscure because knowledge is based on rare reports with few patients. Objective: To characterize the outcomes of lung neuroendocrine tumors associated with Cushing syndrome. Design, Setting, and Participants: An observational case series review from 1982 to 2020 was conducted in a single institution referral center. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated disease-free survival (DFS). Participants underwent curative-intent surgery for a lung neuroendocrine tumor causing Cushing syndrome. Exposures: Lobectomy or pneumonectomy vs sublobar resection. Main Outcomes and Measures: Disease-free survival, disease persistence/recurrence. Results: Of the 68 patients, the median age was 41 years (range, 17-80 years), 42.6% (29 of 68) were male, 81.8% (54 of 66) were White, with a mean follow-up after surgery was 16 months (range, 0.1-341 months). Lobectomy was the most common procedure (48 of 68 [70.6%]), followed by wedge resection (16 of 68 [23.5%]) and segmentectomy (3 of 68 [4.4%]). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was performed in 19 of 68 (27.9%) of patients. Surgical morbidity was 19.1% (13 of 68), and perioperative mortality was 1.5% (1 of 68). Lymph node positivity was 37% (22 of 59) when evaluable. The overall incidence of persistence/recurrence was 16.2% (11 of 68) with a median time to recurrence of 55 months (range, 18-152 months). The median DFS was reached in 12.7 years (0.1-334 months). There were no statistical differences in DFS based on tumor size, stage (8th edition TNM), whether full systematic lymphadenectomy was performed or not, nodal status, or surgical approach. Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series study, neuroendocrine pulmonary tumors associated with Cushing syndrome had increased nodal metastasis, higher recurrence, and lower DFS than quiescent bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors, but many patients experienced favorable outcomes. This observation is underscored by the discordance of TNM-stage classifications vs prognosis. Observing no difference in surgical techniques, the implication may be that a lung-sparing approach could suffice. These results may reflect the intrinsic importance of the hormone physiology instead of the carcinoid biologic factors.

Survival benefit of a combined surgical approach in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported survival benefit of surgery in patients with stage IV breast cancer (BC); prospective trials yielded inconclusive results. METHODS: We sampled the National Cancer Database (2004-2016) for de novo stage IV BC patients undergoing both primary site resection and metastasectomy. A multivariate Cox-regression survival model investigated the overall survival (OS) of this surgical approach as compared to lumpectomy/mastectomy alone, metastasectomy alone, or no surgery. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to demonstrate the utility of surgery when metastasis were confined to 1 site stratifying by tissue type. RESULTS: A total of n = 55,125 patients were included. As compared to lumpectomy/mastectomy alone (43 months), lumpectomy/mastectomy + metastasectomy exhibited the best OS (50 months, p = 0.012), metastasectomy alone showed slightly worse OS (30 months, p < 0.0001), and no surgery had the worst OS (21 months, p < 0.0001). In metastasis confined to 1 site, superior OS with combined lumpectomy/mastectomy and metastasectomy versus lumpectomy/mastectomy alone was observed with liver (72.8 vs. 48.1 months, p < 0.001) or lung (49.2 vs. 36.8 months, p < 0.001) metastasis but not bone (52.2 vs. 49.9 months, p < 0.001) or brain (16.2 vs. 15.5 months, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with metastatic BC undergoing primary site resection and metastasectomy exhibited optimal OS, particularly when metastasis involved only the liver or lung.

Lumpectomy followed by radiation improves survival in HER2 positive and triple-negative breast cancer with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes compared to mastectomy alone.

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to compare the 5-year DFS and 5-year OS in patients with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 breast cancer (HER2+ BC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in relation to the amount of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) after locoregional management by either mastectomy without radiation or lumpectomy and whole-breast radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of HER2+ BC and TNBC patients' charts and histopathology slides with clinical stage of T1-T2 N0 who presented at our facility between January 2009 and December 2019. Locoregional treatment included either mastectomy without RT (M) or lumpectomy with RT (L+R). TILs were assessed by three pathologists using the guidelines of the 2014 TILs working group. A competing risk model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to analyze correlations between TILs levels and clinical outcome. RESULTS: We reviewed 211 patients' charts. Of them, 190 proceeded to the final analysis. Patients were split into groups of "low TILs" and "high TILs" based on a 50% TILs cut-off. Of them 26% had high TILs, 48% received RT, 97% received chemotherapy, all HER2+ BC patients received HER2-directed therapy and all HER2+ BC that were also hormone receptor positive (HR+) received endocrine therapy (ET). In patient with low TILs, L+R did not improve outcomes compared to M. Moreover, patients with high TILs had a significant improvement of their DFS and OS with L+R when compared to M. CONCLUSION: The results of our study reflect that a selected group of HER2+ BC and TNBC with elevated TILs, L+R is associated with improvement of 5-year DFS and 5-year OS.

Additional radiotherapy to breast-conserving surgery is an optional treatment for de novo stage IV breast cancer: A population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the value of locoregional treatment (LRT) including breast-conserving surgery (BCS), mastectomy (MAST), and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer were retrospectively identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2014. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank tests, propensity score matching (PSM), and the multivariate Cox proportional model were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5798 patients were identified including 849 (14.6%), 763 (13.2%), 2338 (40.3%), and 1848 (31.9%) who received BCS alone, BCS+RT, MAST alone, and MAST+RT, respectively. The proportions of receiving BCS decreased from 35.9% in 2004 to 26.2% in 2014 (p = 0.002), and the probability of patients receiving MAST increased from 64.1% in 2004 to 74.8% in 2014 (p = 0.002). Before PSM, there was a significant difference in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) among the treatment arms. Patients who received RT had better BCSS, the 5-year BCSS was 40.5%, 52.3%, 41.5%, and 47.7% in patients treated with BCS alone, BCS+RT, MAST alone, and MAST+RT, respectively (p < 0.001). In the PSM cohort, patients treated with BCS alone had lower 5-year BCSS compared to those treated with BCS+RT (43.9% and 52.1%, p = 0.002). However, there were comparable 5-year BCSS between BCS+RT and MAST alone groups (51.3% and 50.1%, p = 0.872), and BCS+RT and MAST+RT cohorts (51.5% and 55.7%, p = 0.333). Similar results were confirmed in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative RT improves BCSS in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer, and BCS+RT shows a non-inferior outcome compared to MAST+RT. BCS+RT may be the optimal local management of de novo stage IV breast cancer.

Effect of fluorouracil and plastic breast-conserving surgery in young patients with early breast cancer.

To explore the effect of fluorouracil and plastic breast-conserving surgery on the immune level, psychological status and quality of life of young patients with early breast cancer. Seventy-six young patients with early breast cancer admitted to Cangzhou Central Hospital from January 2016 to January 2017 were selected and divided into a control group (n=38, conventional breast-conserving surgery) and an observation group (n=38, Fluorouracil and plastic breast-conserving surgery). The observation group had shorter operation time and hospital stay and less intraoperative blood loss in comparison to the control group (P<0.05); the CD4+, CD8+ and IL-8 of the observation group were higher, and the CD4+/CD8+ and IL-10 were lower (P<0.05); the HAMD and HAMA scores of the observation group were significantly lower (P<0.05); the physiological, emotional, and family, functional, and additional concerns were lower in the observation group (P<0.05); the postoperative breast shape satisfaction was higher in the observation group (P<0.05). Fluorouracil combined with plastic breast-conserving surgery has a better treatment effect on young patients with early breast cancer, which can promote postoperative recovery, maintain normal breast morphology, reduce the immune function damage caused by the surgery, improve patients' psychological status and quality of life, and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and deaths.

Breast-conserving surgery with or without irradiation in women with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast receiving preoperative systemic therapy: A cohort study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the outcomes of adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast (breast IDC) receiving preoperative systemic therapy (PST) and breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and their prognostic factors, considering overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), and disease-free survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed as having breast IDC and receiving PST followed by BCS were recruited and categorized by treatment into non-breast radiation therapy [BRT] (control) and WBRT (case) groups, respectively. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that non-BRT, cN3, and pathologic residual tumor (ypT2-4) or nodal (ypN2-3) stages were poor prognostic factors for OS. The adjusted HRs (aHRs; 95% CIs) of the WBRT group to non-BRT group for all-cause mortality were 0.14 (0.03-0.81), 0.32 (0.16-0.64), 0.43 (0.23-0.79), 0.23 (0.13-0.42), 0.52 (0.20-1.33), and 0.34 (0.13-0.87) in the ypT0, ypT1, ypT2-4, ypN0, ypN1, and ypN2-3 stages, respectively. The aHRs (95% CIs) of the WBRT group to non-BRT group for all-cause mortality were 0.09 (0.00-4.07), 0.46 (0.26-0.83), 0.18 (0.06-0.51), 0.28 (0.06-1.34), 0.25 (0.10-0.63), 0.47 (0.23-0.88), and 0.32 in the cT0-1, cT2, cT3, cT4, cN0, cN1, and cN2-3 stages, respectively. The WBRT group exhibited significantly better LRR-free and DM-free survival than the non-BRT group, regardless of the clinical T or N stage or pathologic response after PST. CONCLUSION: WBRT might lead to superior OS and LRR-free and DM-free survival compared with the non-BRT group, regardless of the initial clinical TN stage or pathologic response.

Adjuvant radiation therapy alone is associated with improved overall survival compared to hormonal therapy alone in older women with estrogen receptor positive early stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) without radiation therapy (RT) is an acceptable approach for older women with early stage, estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. Toxicity and compliance remain issues with HT. Adjuvant RT alone may have better compliance, but its efficacy in the absence of HT is unclear. We aim to assess patterns of adjuvant therapy and survival outcomes among older women with early stage, ER positive (ER+) breast cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to identify 130,194 women age ≥65 years with invasive ER+, node negative breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. All patients underwent BCS. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to examine overall survival (OS). The association between adjuvant therapy and OS was assessed in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Unadjusted 5/10-year OS rates were 90.0%/64.3% for HT and RT, 84.2%/54.9% for RT alone, 78.7%/44.5% for HT alone, and 71.6%/38.0% for no treatment; p<0.001 for all. Compared to HT alone, the 10-year multivariable hazard ratio (HR) for death for RT alone was 0.86 (95% CI 0.82-0.91). In propensity-matched patients who received RT alone or HT alone (n=21,326), RT alone had significantly better survival at 5 (HRadj : 0.84) and 10 (HRadj : 0.87) years. CONCLUSIONS: Older women with early stage ER+ breast cancer who undergo BCS and receive both HT and RT have the best survival, while RT as single-modality therapy had higher rates of OS at 5 and 10 years compared to HT alone.

Association of surgical margins with local recurrence in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to report a single-institution experience using breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), focusing on the association between microscopic resection margin status and locoregional recurrence (LRR). METHODS: Our institutional prospectively maintained database was reviewed to identify patients who were treated with NACT between January 2008 and April 2018. RESULTS: Among the main partial mastectomy specimens available for analysis (n = 161), 28 had margins < 1 mm, 21 had margin width of 1-2 mm and the remaining 112 had margins > 2 mm. LRR occurred in 16 patients (9.9%) and distant metastases were detected in 27 (16.8%) patients. There was no significant difference in the LRR between the > 2 mm margin group with a 60-month cumulative survival of 85.2% compared with 76.2% for the ≤2 mm group (P = 0.335) in the Kaplan-Meier analysis. When we stratified patients by margin widths of ≥1 mm or <  1 mm, there was no LRR-free survival benefit observed for the ≥1 mm pathologic excision margin group in the univariate analysis (hazard ratio = 0.443; 95% confidence interval = 0.142-1.383; P = 0.161) with a 60-month cumulative LRR-free survival of 84.9% compared with 69.5% for the < 1 mm margin cohort (P = 0.150). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of multiple scattered microscopic tumour foci, a negative margin of no ink on tumour maybe sufficient for stage I-III invasive breast cancer treated with NACT and breast-conserving surgery.

Breast-conserving surgery without axillary lymph node surgery or radiotherapy is safe for HER2-positive and triple negative breast cancer patients over 70 years of age.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is very good, and their survival is unaffected by performing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) without radiotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to verify that BCS without axillary lymph node dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy, or radiotherapy (BCSNR) is safe for patients over 70 years of age with luminal-type breast cancer, as well as for those with HER2-positive and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: This study retrospectively included 450 patients > 70-year-old with breast cancer from 2010 to 2016. The patients were divided into two groups, one treated with BCSNR and the other treated with mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (MALND), with a median follow-up period of 5 years. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The 5-year DFS for patients who underwent BCSNR and MALND was 90.1 and 91.3% (p = 0.903), respectively. In the BCSNR and MALND groups, respectively, the 5-year DFS for patients with luminal A type breast cancer was 99.2 and 100% (p = 0.167), that for patients with luminal B type breast cancer was 89.2 and 95.5% (p = 0.138), that for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer was 86.7 and 75.9% (p = 0.455), and that for TNBC patients was 71.7 and 89.7% (p = 0.195). IBTR significantly differed between the BCSNR and MALND groups for patients with TNBC (18.9% vs 0.0%, p = 0.040) and luminal B type patients (5.6% vs 0.0%, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: BCSNR is not only suitable for elderly patients with luminal-type breast cancer but also for those with HER2-positive breast cancer and TNBC.

Effect of breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy on operation index, symptom checklist-90 score and prognosis in patients with early breast cancer.

The present study aims to analyze the effects of breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy on operation indexes, Symptom checklist-90 scores and prognosis in patients with early breast cancer.The clinical data of 128 patients with breast cancer who were treated in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2016 were included into the analysis. These patients were divided into 2 groups, according to the different modes of operation (n = 64): control group, patients underwent modified radical mastectomy; observation group, patients underwent early breast conserving surgery. Then, the surgical indexes and prognosis were compared between these 2 groups.Intraoperative bleeding volume, incision length and hospitalization duration were better in the observation group than in the control group (P < .05). Furthermore, postoperative symptom checklist-90 scores in the observation group were better than scores before the operation, and were better than the scores in the control group (P < .05). Moreover, the incidence of postoperative complications was lower in the observation group (3.13%) than in the control group (21.88%, P < .05).Early breast-conserving surgery is more advantageous for breast cancers and results to lesser bleeding, rapid recovery, and fewer complications.

Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer, is it time to think again?

Multifocal multicentric breast cancer has traditionally been considered a contraindication to breast conserving surgery because of concerns regarding locoregional control and risk of disease recurrence. However, the evidence supporting this practice is limited. Increasingly, many breast surgeons are advocating breast conservation in selected cases. This short narrative review summarises current evidence on the role of surgery in multifocal multicentric breast cancer and shows that when technically feasible the option of breast conservation is oncologically safe.

Endocrine therapy with or without whole breast irradiation in low-risk breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery: 10-year results of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 8A trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate long-term results of patients with hormonal receptor-positive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and consecutive endocrine therapy (ET) with or without whole breast irradiation (WBI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Within the 8 A trial of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, a total of 869 patients received ET after BCS which was randomly followed by WBI (n = 439, group 1) or observation (n = 430, group 2). WBI was applied up to a mean total dosage of 50 Gy (+/- 10 Gy boost) in conventional fractionation. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 9.89 years, 10 in-breast recurrences (IBRs) were observed in group 1 and 31 in group 2, resulting in a 10-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of 97.5% and 92.4%, respectively (p = 0.004). This translated into significantly higher rates for disease-free survival (DFS): 94.5% group 1 vs 88.4% group 2, p = 0.0156. For distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS), respective 10-year rates amounted 96.7% and 86.6% for group 1 versus 96.4% and 87.6%, for group 2 (ns). WBI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.27, p < 0.01) and tumour grading (HR: 3.76, p = 0.03) were found as significant predictors for IBR in multiple cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: After a median follow-up of 10 years, WBI resulted in a better local control and DFS compared with ET alone. The omission of WBI and tumour grading, respectively, were the only negative predictors for LRFS.

Adjuvant regional nodal irradiation did not improve outcomes in T1-2N1 breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery: A propensity score matching analysis of BIG02/98 and BCIRG005 trials.

AIM: To determine whether the addition of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to whole-breast irradiation (WBI) would improve outcomes over WBI alone in T1-2N1 breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant systematic therapy. METHODS: Data were obtained from two randomized controlled trials (NCT00174655 and NCT00312208). Univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analysis were performed to investigate predictors for overall survival and disease-free survival. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was applied to eliminate selection bias. RESULTS: With median follow-up 80 months (range: 3-155 months), the 5-year local regional recurrence in the WBI group was 2% vs. 5% (p = 0.28) in the WBI + supraclavicular radiotherapy, and the rate of 5-year distant metastasis in the WBI group was 7% vs. 13% in the WBI + supraclavicular radiotherapy (p = 0.0748); In addition, the 5-year local regional recurrence in the WBI group was 3% vs. 9% (p = 0.19) in the WBI + internal mammary irradiation (IMI); However, the rate of 5-year distant metastasis in the in the WBI group was significantly lower than that in the WBI + IMI (8% vs. 24%, p = 0.036). After PSM, cox-regression analysis indicated that neither RNI nor IMI in combination with WBI in T1-2N1 breast cancer was associated with an improved overall survival and disease-free survival when compared to WBI alone. CONCLUSION: The addition of RNI to WBI in T1-2N1 breast cancer after BCS and adjuvant systematic therapy did not improve outcomes in comparison with WBI alone. Further studies are still needed to identify patients who would most benefit from RNI in this patient population.

Breast conserving therapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to mastectomy in early-stage, lymph node-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent retrospective studies suggest improved overall survival (OS) with breast conserving therapy (BCT), including breast conserving surgery and adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy, compared to mastectomy in the modern era. The patient subset most likely to benefit from BCT remains unclear, and the role of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) in this context is unknown. We compared BCT to mastectomy in early-stage, node-negative breast cancer. We further explored outcomes after stratification by RS and age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a matched-cohort analysis of National Cancer Database (NCDB) patients with pT1-2, pN0, cM0 breast cancer treated between 2006 and 2014 with BCT or mastectomy. Patients were matched for all available baseline characteristics using propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with stabilized weights. RESULTS: We identified 144,263 eligible patients treated with BCT and 87,379 patients treated with mastectomy. After IPTW-matching, OS was higher with BCT compared to mastectomy: 5-year OS of 94.4% vs. 91.8% (P < 0.001) and 7-year OS of 90% vs. 85.2% (P < 0.001). Doubly robust multivariable analysis showed an association between BCT and improved OS (HR 0.66, 95% CI, 0.64-0.69, P < 0.001). In a subset analysis, BCT was associated with improved OS in patients with RS >25, but not patients with RS ≤25. When stratified by age, only patients >50 years had improved OS with BCT. CONCLUSION: BCT is associated with improved OS compared to mastectomy in women with early-stage, node-negative breast cancer. The improvement in OS with BCT appears to be most pronounced in patients with high RS and >50 years of age. Prospective validation of these findings is required.

Nodal Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Predicts Receipt of Radiation Therapy After Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is associated with improved overall survival (OS) in patients with breast cancer, but it is unclear how post-NACT response influences radiation therapy administration in patients presenting with node-positive disease. We sought to determine whether nodal pCR is associated with likelihood of receiving nodal radiation and whether radiation therapy among patients experiencing nodal pCR is associated with improved OS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical N1 (cN1) female breast cancer patients diagnosed during 2010 to 2015 who were ypN0 (ie, nodal pCR; n = 12,341) or ypN1 (ie, residual disease; n = 13,668) after NACT were identified in the National Cancer Database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receiving radiation therapy. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to estimate the association between radiation therapy and adjusted OS. RESULTS: The study included 26,009 patients; 43.9% (n = 5423) of ypN0 and 55.3% (n = 7556) of ypN1 patients received nodal radiation. Rates of nodal radiation remained the same over time among ypN0 patients (trend test, P = .29) but increased among ypN1 patients from 49% in 2010 to 59% in 2015 (trend test, P < .001). After adjusting for covariates, nodal pCR (vs no stage change) was associated with decreased likelihood of nodal radiation after mastectomy (∼20% decrease) and lumpectomy (∼30% decrease; both P < .01). After mastectomy, nodal (vs no) radiation conferred no significant survival benefit in ypN0 patients, but it approached significance for ypN1 patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.99, P = .04; overall P = .11). After lumpectomy, nodal radiation was associated with improved adjusted OS for ypN0 (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.22-0.66) and ypN1 patients (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.66; both P < .001), but this improvement was not significantly greater than that associated with breast-only radiation. CONCLUSIONS: ypN0 patients were less likely to receive nodal radiation than ypN1 patients were, suggesting that selective omission already occurs and, in the context of limited survival data, could potentially be appropriate for select patients.

Propensity-Matched Analysis Comparing Survival After Sublobar Resection and Lobectomy for cT1N0 Lung Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical method for cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in clinical outcomes of sublobar resection and lobectomy for cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma patients. METHODS: We included 1035 consecutive patients with cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery at our institute from January 2011 to December 2016. The surgical approach, either sublobar resection or lobectomy, was determined at the discretion of each surgeon. A propensity-matched analysis incorporating total tumor diameter, solid component diameter, consolidation-to-tumor (C/T) ratio, and performance status was used to compare the clinical outcomes of the sublobar resection and lobectomy groups. RESULTS: Sublobar resection and lobectomy were performed for 604 (58.4%; wedge resection/segmentectomy: 470/134) and 431 (41.6%) patients, respectively. Patients in the sublobar resection group had smaller total tumor diameters, smaller solid component diameters, lower C/T ratios, and better performance status. More lymph nodes were dissected in the lobectomy group. Patients in the sublobar resection group had better perioperative outcomes. A multivariable analysis revealed that the solid component diameter and serum carcinoembryonic antigen level are independent risk factors for tumor recurrence. After propensity matching, 284 paired patients in each group were included. No differences in overall survival (OS; p = 0.424) or disease-free survival (DFS; p = 0.296) were noted between the two matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sublobar resection is not inferior to lobectomy regarding both DFS and OS for cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma patients. Sublobar resection may be a feasible surgical method for cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma.

Investigating confounders of the association between survival and adjuvant radiation therapy after breast conserving surgery in a sample of elderly breast Cancer patients in Appalachia.

BACKGROUND: To explain the association between adjuvant radiation therapy after breast conserving surgery (BCS RT) and overall survival (OS) by quantifying bias due to confounding in a sample of elderly breast cancer beneficiaries in a multi-state region of Appalachia. METHODS: We used Medicare claims linked registry data for fee-for-service beneficiaries with AJCC stage I-III, treated with BCS, and diagnosed from 2006 to 2008 in Appalachian counties of Kentucky, Ohio, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. Confounders of BCS RT included age, rurality, regional SES, access to radiation facilities, marital status, Charlson comorbidity, Medicaid dual status, institutionalization, tumor characteristics, and surgical facility characteristics. Adjusted percent change in expected survival by BCS RT was examined using Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) models. Confounding bias was assessed by comparing effects between adjusted and partially adjusted associations using a fully specified structural model. RESULTS: The final sample had 2675 beneficiaries with mean age of 75, with 81% 5-year survival from diagnosis. Unadjusted percentage increase in expected survival was 2.75 times greater in the RT group vs. non-RT group, with 5-year survival of 85% vs 60%; fully adjusted percentage increase was 1.70 times greater, with 5-year rates of 83% vs 71%. Quantification of incremental confounding showed age accounted for 71% of the effect reduction, followed by tumor features (12%), comorbidity (10%), dual status(10%), and institutionalization (8%). Adjusting for age and tumor features only resulted in only 4% bias from fully adjusted percent change (70% change vs 66%). CONCLUSION: Quantification of confounding aids in determining covariates to adjust for and in interpreting raw associations. Substantial confounding was present (60% of total association), with age accounting for the largest share (71%); adjusting for age plus tumor features corrected for most of the confounding (4% bias). The direct effect of BCS RT on OS accounted for 40% of the total association.

Clinicogenomic Radiotherapy Classifier Predicting the Need for Intensified Locoregional Treatment After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Most patients with early-stage breast cancer are treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) to prevent locoregional recurrence (LRR). However, no genomic tools are used currently to select the optimal RT strategy. METHODS: We profiled the transcriptome of primary tumors on a clinical grade assay from the SweBCG91-RT trial, in which patients with node-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to either whole-breast RT after BCS or no RT. We derived a new classifier, Adjuvant Radiotherapy Intensification Classifier (ARTIC), comprising 27 genes and patient age, in three publicly available cohorts, then independently validated ARTIC for LRR in 748 patients in SweBCG91-RT. We also compared previously published genomic signatures for ability to predict benefit from RT in SweBCG91-RT. RESULTS: ARTIC was highly prognostic for LRR in patients treated with RT (hazard ratio [HR], 3.4; 95% CI, 2.0 to 5.9; P < .001) and predictive of RT benefit (Pinteraction = .005). Patients with low ARTIC scores had a large benefit from RT (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.52], P < .001; 10-year cumulative incidence of LRR, 6% v 21%), whereas those with high ARTIC scores benefited less from RT (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.44 to 1.2], P = .23; 10-year cumulative incidence of LRR, 25% v 32%). In contrast, none of the eight previously published signatures were predictive of benefit from RT in SweBCG91-RT. CONCLUSION: ARTIC identified women with a substantial benefit from RT as well as women with a particularly elevated LRR risk in whom whole-breast RT was not sufficiently effective and, thus, in whom intensified treatment strategies such as tumor-bed boost, and possibly regional nodal RT, should be considered. To our knowledge, ARTIC is the first classifier validated as predictive of benefit from RT in a phase III clinical trial with patients randomly assigned to receive or not receive RT.