Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 5.796
Filtrar
1.
Cancer Med ; 13(10): e7027, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38770622

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Black men and men with end-stage kidney disease have lower rates of treatment and higher mortality for prostate cancer. We studied the interaction of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with Black race for treatment rates and mortality for men with prostate cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 516 Black and 551 White men with ESKD before prostate cancer 22,299 Black men, and 141,821 White men without ESKD who were 40 years or older from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results-Medicare data (2004-2016). All Black men with or without ESKD and White men with ESKD had higher prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis than White men without ESKD. Black men with ESKD had the lowest rates for treatment in both local and advanced stages of prostate cancer (age-adjusted risk ratio: 0.76, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.71-0.82 for local stage and age-adjusted risk ratio: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76-0.9 for advanced stages) compared to White men without ESKD. Compared to White men without ESKD, prostate cancer-specific mortality was higher in White men with ESKD for both local and advanced stages (age-adjusted hazard ratio: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-2.8 and HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2-2.2) and it was higher for ESKD Black men only in advanced stage prostate cancer (age-adjusted hazard ratio: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.5-3.6). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that having a comorbidity such as ESKD makes Black men more vulnerable to racial disparities in prostate cancer treatment and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Fallo Renal Crónico , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Programa de VERF , Población Blanca , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etnología , Anciano , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Am J Manag Care ; 30(5): 218-223, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748929

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Most Medicare beneficiaries obtain supplemental insurance or enroll in Medicare Advantage (MA) to protect against potentially high cost sharing in traditional Medicare (TM). We examined changes in Medicare supplemental insurance coverage in the context of MA growth. STUDY DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional analysis of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey from 2005 to 2019. METHODS: We determined whether Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older were enrolled in MA (without Medicaid), TM without supplemental coverage, TM with employer-sponsored supplemental coverage, TM with Medigap, or Medicaid (in TM or MA). RESULTS: From 2005 to 2019, beneficiaries with TM and supplemental insurance provided by their former (or current) employer declined by approximately half (31.8% to 15.5%) while the share in MA (without Medicaid) more than doubled (13.4% to 35.1%). The decline in supplemental employer-sponsored insurance use was greater for White and for higher-income beneficiaries. Over the same period, beneficiaries in TM without supplemental coverage declined by more than a quarter (13.9% to 10.1%). This decline was largest for Black, Hispanic, and lower-income beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid rise in MA enrollment from 2005 to 2019 was accompanied by substantial changes in supplemental insurance with TM. Our results emphasize the interconnectedness of different insurance choices made by Medicare beneficiaries.


Asunto(s)
Medicare Part C , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicare Part C/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare Part C/economía , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Seguro de Costos Compartidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro Adicional/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2411520, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753329

RESUMEN

Importance: Transitions in care settings following live discharge from hospice care are burdensome for patients and families. Factors contributing to risk of burdensome transitions following hospice discharge are understudied. Objective: To identify factors associated with 2 burdensome transitions following hospice live discharge, as defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study included a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries using 2014 to 2019 Medicare claims data. Data were analyzed from April 22, 2023, to March 4, 2024. Exposure: Live hospice discharge. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable logistic regression examined associations among patient, health care provision, and organizational characteristics with 2 burdensome transitions after live hospice discharge (outcomes): type 1, hospice discharge, hospitalization within 2 days, and hospice readmission within 2 days; and type 2, hospice discharge, hospitalization within 2 days, and hospital death. Results: This study included 115 072 Medicare beneficiaries discharged alive from hospice (mean [SD] age, 84.4 [6.6] years; 71892 [62.5%] female; 5462 [4.8%] Hispanic, 9822 [8.5%] non-Hispanic Black, and 96 115 [83.5%] non-Hispanic White). Overall, 10 381 individuals (9.0%) experienced a type 1 burdensome transition and 3144 individuals (2.7%) experienced a type 2 burdensome transition. In adjusted models, factors associated with higher odds of burdensome transitions included identifying as non-Hispanic Black (type 1: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.36-1.58; type 2: aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.51-1.90), hospice stays of 7 days or fewer (type 1: aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.21; type 2: aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.53-1.90), and care from a for-profit hospice (type 1: aOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.62-1.96; type 2: aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15-1.52). Nursing home residence (type 1: aOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61-0.72; type 2: aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40-0.54) and hospice stays of 180 days or longer (type 1: aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.59-0.68; type 2: aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.52-0.69) were associated with lower odds of burdensome transitions. Conclusion and Relevance: This retrospective cohort study of burdensome transitions following live hospice discharge found that non-Hispanic Black race, short hospice stays, and care from for-profit hospices were associated with higher odds of experiencing a burdensome transition. These findings suggest that changes to clinical practice and policy may reduce the risk of burdensome transitions, such as hospice discharge planning that is incentivized, systematically applied, and tailored to needs of patients at greater risk for burdensome transitions.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Hospitalización , Medicare , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anciano , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales para Enfermos Terminales/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1326, 2024 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755548

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hypertension prevalence among the overall US adult population has been relatively stable during the last two decades. However, whether this stabilization has occurred across rural-urban communities and across different geographic regions is unknown, particularly among older adults with diabetes who are likely to have concomitant cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: This serial cross-sectional analysis used the 5% national sample of Medicare administrative claims data (n = 3,516,541) to examine temporal trends (2005-2017) in diagnosed hypertension among older adults with diabetes, across urban-rural communities and US census regions (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). Joinpoint regression was used to obtain annual percent change (APC) in hypertension prevalence across rural-urban communities and geographic regions, and multivariable adjusted regression was used to assess associations between rural-urban communities and hypertension prevalence. RESULTS: The APC in the prevalence of hypertension was higher during 2005-2010, and there was a slowdown in the increase during 2011-2017 across all regions, with significant variations across rural-urban communities within each of the regions. In the regression analysis, in the adjusted model, older adults living in non-core (most rural) areas in the Midwest (PR = 0.988, 95% CI: 0.981-0.995) and West (PR = 0.935, 95% CI: 0.923-0.946) had lower hypertension prevalence than their regional counterparts living in large central metro areas. CONCLUSIONS: Although the magnitudes of these associations are small, differences in hypertension prevalence across rural-urban areas and geographic regions may have implications for targeted interventions to improve chronic disease prevention and management.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Hipertensión , Población Rural , Población Urbana , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Prevalencia , Estudios Transversales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo
5.
Med Care ; 62(6): 423-430, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728681

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Fragmented readmissions, when admission and readmission occur at different hospitals, are associated with increased charges compared with nonfragmented readmissions. We assessed if hospital participation in health information exchange (HIE) was associated with differences in total charges in fragmented readmissions. DATA SOURCE: Medicare Fee-for-Service Data, 2018. STUDY DESIGN: We used generalized linear models with hospital referral region and readmission month fixed effects to assess relationships between information sharing (same HIE, different HIEs, and no HIE available) and total charges of 30-day readmissions among fragmented readmissions; analyses were adjusted for patient-level clinical/demographic characteristics and hospital-level characteristics. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We included beneficiaries with a hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, syncope, urinary tract infection, dehydration, or behavioral issues with a 30-day readmission for any reason. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In all, 279,729 admission-readmission pairs were included, 27% of which were fragmented (n=75,438); average charges of fragmented readmissions were $64,897-$71,606. Compared with fragmented readmissions where no HIE was available, the average marginal effects of same-HIE and different-HIE admission-readmission pairs were -$2329.55 (95% CI: -7333.73, 2674.62) and -$3905.20 (95% CI: -7592.85, -307.54), respectively. While the average marginal effects of different-HIE pairs were lower than those for no-HIE fragmented readmissions, the average marginal effects of same-HIE and different-HIE pairs were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistical differences in charges between fragmented readmissions to hospitals that share an HIE or that do not share an HIE compared with hospitals with no HIE available.


Asunto(s)
Intercambio de Información en Salud , Medicare , Readmisión del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Intercambio de Información en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2413309, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38805226

RESUMEN

Importance: More than 70 000 Medicare beneficiaries receive care in long-term acute care hospitals (LTCHs) annually for prolonged acute illness. However, little is known about long-term functional and cognitive outcomes of middle-aged and older adults after hospitalization in an LTCH. Objective: To describe survival, functional, and cognitive status after LTCH hospitalization and to identify factors associated with an adverse outcome. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included middle-aged and older adults enrolled in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) with linked fee-for-service Medicare claims. Included participants were aged 50 years or older with an LTCH admission between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2016, with HRS interviews available before admission. Data were analyzed between November 1, 2021, and June 30, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Function and cognition were ascertained from HRS interviews conducted every 2 years. The primary outcome was death or severe impairment in the 2.5 years after LTCH hospitalization, defined as dependencies in 2 or more activities of daily living (ADLs) or dementia. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations with a priori selected risk factors including pre-LTCH survival prognosis (Lee index score), pre-LTCH impairment status, and illness severity characterized by receipt of mechanical ventilation and prolonged intensive care unit stay of 3 days or longer. Results: This study included 396 participants, with a median age of 75 (IQR, 68-82) years. Of the participants, 201 (51%) were women, 125 (28%) had severe impairment, and 318 (80%) died or survived with severe impairment (functional, cognitive, or both) within 2.5 years of LTCH hospitalization. After accounting for acute illness characteristics, prehospitalization survival prognosis as determined by the Lee index score and severe baseline impairment (functional, cognitive, or both) were associated with an increased likelihood of death or severe impairment in the 2.5 years after LTCH hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.2 [95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0] for a 5-point increase in Lee index score; and AOR, 4.5 [95% CI, 1.3 to 15.4] for severe vs no impairment). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, 4 of 5 middle-aged and older adults died or survived with severe impairment within 2.5 years of LTCH hospitalization. Better preadmission survival prognosis and functional and cognitive status were associated with lower risk of an adverse outcome, and these findings should inform decision-making for older adults with prolonged acute illness.


Asunto(s)
Cognición , Hospitalización , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Actividades Cotidianas , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3486-3492, 2024 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704258

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While safety of influenza vaccines is well-established, some studies have suggested potential associations between influenza vaccines and certain adverse events (AEs). This study examined the safety of the 2022-2023 influenza vaccines among U.S. adults ≥ 65 years. METHODS: A self-controlled case series compared incidence rates of anaphylaxis, encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), and transverse myelitis following 2022-2023 seasonal influenza vaccinations (i.e., any, high-dose or adjuvanted) in risk and control intervals among Medicare beneficiaries ≥ 65 years. We used conditional Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for event-dependent observation time and seasonality. Analyses also accounted for uncertainty from outcome misclassification where feasible. For AEs with any statistically significant associations, we stratified results by concomitant vaccination status. RESULTS: Among 12.7 million vaccine recipients, we observed 76 anaphylaxis, 276 encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, 134 GBS and 75 transverse myelitis cases. Only rates of anaphylaxis were elevated in risk compared to control intervals. With all adjustments, an elevated, but non-statistically significant, anaphylaxis rate was observed following any (IRR: 2.40, 95% CI: 0.96-6.03), high-dose (IRR: 2.31, 95% CI: 0.67-7.91), and adjuvanted (IRR: 3.28, 95% CI: 0.71-15.08) influenza vaccination; anaphylaxis IRRs were 2.54 (95% CI: 0.49-13.05) and 1.64 (95% CI: 0.38-7.05) for persons with and without concomitant vaccination, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, GBS, or transverse myelitis were not elevated following 2022-2023 seasonal influenza vaccinations among U.S. adults ≥ 65 years. There was an increased rate of anaphylaxis following influenza vaccination that may have been influenced by concomitant vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Vacunación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/etiología , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/inducido químicamente , Incidencia , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Mielitis Transversa/epidemiología , Mielitis Transversa/etiología , Estaciones del Año , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos
8.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2411006, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739388

RESUMEN

Importance: Understanding the association of telehealth use with health care outcomes is fundamental to determining whether telehealth waivers implemented during the COVID-19 public health emergency should be made permanent. The current literature has yielded inconclusive findings owing to its focus on select states, practices, or health care systems. Objective: To estimate the association of telehealth use with outcomes for all Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries by comparing hospital service areas (HSAs) with different levels of telehealth use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This US population-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted from July 2022 to April 2023. Participants included Medicare claims of beneficiaries attributed to HSAs with FFS enrollment in Parts A and B. Exposures: Low, medium, or high tercile of telehealth use created by ranking HSAs according to the number of telehealth visits per 1000 beneficiaries. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were quality (ambulatory care-sensitive [ACS] hospitalizations and emergency department [ED] visits per 1000 FFS beneficiaries), access to care (clinician encounters per FFS beneficiary), and cost (total cost of care for Part A and/or B services per FFS Medicare beneficiary) determined with a difference-in-difference analysis. Results: In this cohort study of claims from approximately 30 million Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age in 2019, 71.04 [1.67] years; mean [SD] percentage female in 2019, 53.83% [2.14%]) within 3436 HSAs, between the second half of 2019 and the second half of 2021, mean ACS hospitalizations and ED visits declined sharply, mean clinician encounters per beneficiary declined slightly, and mean total cost of care per beneficiary per semester increased slightly. Compared with the low group, the high group had more ACS hospitalizations (1.63 additional hospitalizations per 1000 beneficiaries; 95% CI, 1.03-2.22 hospitalizations), more clinician encounters (0.30 additional encounters per beneficiary per semester; 95% CI, 0.23-0.38 encounters), and higher total cost of care ($164.99 higher cost per beneficiary per semester; 95% CI, $101.03-$228.96). There was no statistically significant difference in ACS ED visits between the low and high groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries across all 3436 HSAs, high levels of telehealth use were associated with more clinician encounters, more ACS hospitalizations, and higher total health care costs. COVID-19 cases were still high during the period of study, which suggests that these findings partially reflect a higher capacity for providing health services in HSAs with higher telehealth intensity than other HSAs.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Medicare , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Telemedicina , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2410713, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728030

RESUMEN

Importance: Older adults with socioeconomic disadvantage develop a greater burden of disability after critical illness than those without socioeconomic disadvantage. The delivery of in-hospital rehabilitation that can mitigate functional decline may be influenced by social determinants of health (SDOH). Whether rehabilitation delivery differs by SDOH during critical illness hospitalization is not known. Objective: To evaluate whether SDOH are associated with the delivery of skilled rehabilitation during critical illness hospitalization among older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study linked with Medicare claims (2011-2018). Participants included older adults hospitalized with a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data were analyzed from August 2022 to September 2023. Exposures: Dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid, education, income, limited English proficiency (LEP), and rural residence. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was delivery of physical therapy (PT) and/or occupational therapy (OT) during ICU hospitalization, characterized as any in-hospital PT or OT and rate of in-hospital PT or OT, calculated as total number of units divided by length of stay. Results: In the sample of 1618 ICU hospitalizations (median [IQR] patient age, 81.0 [75.0-86.0] years; 842 [52.0%] female), 371 hospitalizations (22.9%) were among patients with dual Medicare and Medicaid eligibility, 523 hospitalizations (32.6%) were among patients with less than high school education, 320 hospitalizations (19.8%) were for patients with rural residence, and 56 hospitalizations (3.5%) were among patients with LEP. A total of 1076 hospitalized patients (68.5%) received any PT or OT, with a mean rate of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-1.02) units/d. After adjustment for age, sex, prehospitalization disability, mechanical ventilation, and organ dysfunction, factors associated with lower odds of receipt of PT or OT included dual Medicare and Medicaid eligibility (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.50-0.97]) and rural residence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.48-0.87]). LEP was associated with a lower rate of PT or OT (adjusted rate ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.32-0.94]). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings highlight the need to consider SDOH in efforts to promote rehabilitation delivery during ICU hospitalization and to investigate factors underlying inequities in this practice.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Medicare , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Humanos , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crítica/rehabilitación , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Ocupacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 601, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714970

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies found that documentation of comorbidities differed when Veterans received care within versus outside Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Changes to medical center funding, increased attention to performance reporting, and expansion of Clinical Documentation Improvement programs, however, may have caused coding in VHA to change. METHODS: Using repeated cross-sectional data, we compared Elixhauser-van Walraven scores and Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) severity levels for Veterans' admissions across settings and payers over time, utilizing a linkage of VHA and all-payer discharge data for 2012-2017 in seven US states. To minimize selection bias, we analyzed records for Veterans admitted to both VHA and non-VHA hospitals in the same year. Using generalized linear models, we adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Following adjustment, VHA admissions consistently had the lowest predicted mean comorbidity scores (4.44 (95% CI 4.34-4.55)) and lowest probability of using the most severe DRG (22.1% (95% CI 21.4%-22.8%)). In contrast, Medicare-covered admissions had the highest predicted mean comorbidity score (5.71 (95% CI 5.56-5.85)) and highest probability of using the top DRG (35.3% (95% CI 34.2%-36.4%)). CONCLUSIONS: More effective strategies may be needed to improve VHA documentation, and current risk-adjusted comparisons should account for differences in coding intensity.


Asunto(s)
Comorbilidad , Hospitales de Veteranos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(5): e240807, 2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700854

RESUMEN

Importance: Comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs) are offered to qualifying US Medicare beneficiaries annually to optimize medication regimens and therapeutic outcomes. In 2016, Medicare adopted CMR completion as a Star Rating quality measure to encourage the use of CMRs. Objective: To examine trends in CMR completion rates before and after 2016 and whether racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in CMR completion changed. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational study using interrupted time-series analysis examined 2013 to 2020 annual cohorts of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years and older eligible for a CMR as determined by Part D plans and by objective minimum eligibility criteria. Data analysis was conducted from September 2022 to February 2024. Exposure: Adoption of CMR completion as a Star Rating quality measure in 2016. Main Outcome and Measures: CMR completion modeled via generalized estimating equations. Results: The study included a total of 561 950 eligible beneficiaries, with 253 561 in the 2013 to 2015 cohort (median [IQR] age, 75.8 [70.7-82.1] years; 90 778 male [35.8%]; 6795 Asian [2.7%]; 24 425 Black [9.6%]; 7674 Hispanic [3.0%]; 208 621 White [82.3%]) and 308 389 in the 2016 to 2020 cohort (median [IQR] age, 75.1 [70.4-80.9] years; 126 730 male [41.1%]; 8922 Asian [2.9%]; 27 915 Black [9.1%]; 7635 Hispanic [2.5%]; 252 781 White [82.0%]). The unadjusted CMR completion rate increased from 10.2% (7379 of 72 225 individuals) in 2013 to 15.6% (14 185 of 90 847 individuals) in 2015 and increased further to 35.8% (18 376 of 51 386 individuals) in 2020, in part because the population deemed by Part D plans to be MTM-eligible decreased by nearly half after 2015 (90 487 individuals in 2015 to 51 386 individuals in 2020). Among a simulated cohort based on Medicare minimum eligibility thresholds, the unadjusted CMR completion rate increased but to a lesser extent, from 4.4% in 2013 to 12.6% in 2020. Compared with White beneficiaries, Asian and Hispanic beneficiaries experienced greater increases in likelihood of CMR completion after 2016 but remained less likely to complete a CMR. Dual-Medicaid enrollees also experienced greater increases in likelihood of CMR completion as compared with those without either designation, but still remained less likely to complete CMR. Conclusion and Relevance: This study found that adoption of CMR completion as a Star Rating quality measure was associated with higher CMR completion rates. The increase in CMR completion rates was achieved partly because Part D plans used stricter eligibility criteria to define eligible patients. Reductions in disparities for eligible Asian, Hispanic, and dual-Medicaid enrollees were seen, but not eliminated. These findings suggest that quality measures can inform plan behavior and could be used to help address disparities.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Medicare Part D/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 30(5): 430-440, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701030

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia. However, published studies of CLL have either only focused on costs among individuals diagnosed with CLL without a non-CLL comparator group or focused on costs associated with specific CLL treatments. An examination of utilization and costs across different care settings provides a holistic view of utilization associated with CLL. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the health care costs and resource utilization types attributable to CLL among Medicare beneficiaries and identify predictors associated with each of the economic outcomes among beneficiaries diagnosed with CLL. METHODS: This retrospective study used a random 20% sample of the Medicare Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW) database covering the 2017-2019 period. The study population consisted of individuals with and without CLL. The CLL cohort and non-CLL cohort were matched using a 1:5 hard match based on baseline categorical variables. We characterized economic outcomes over 360 days across cost categories and places of services. We estimated average marginal effects using multivariable generalized linear regression models of total costs and across type of services. Total cost was compared between CLL and non-CLL cohorts using the matched sample. We used generalized linear models appropriate for the count or binary outcome to identify factors associated with various categories of health care resource utilization, such as inpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and oncologist/hematologist visits. RESULTS: A total of 2,736 beneficiaries in the CLL cohort and 13,571 beneficiaries in the non-CLL matched cohort were identified. Compared with the non-CLL cohort, the annual cost for the CLL cohort was higher (CLL vs non-CLL, mean [SD]: $22,781 [$37,592] vs $13,901 [$24,725]), mainly driven by health care provider costs ($6,535 vs $3,915) and Part D prescription drug costs ($5,916 vs $2,556). The main categories of health care resource utilization were physician evaluation/management visits, oncologist/hematologist visits, and laboratory services. Compared with beneficiaries aged 65-74 years, beneficiaries aged 85 years or older had lower use and cost in maintenance services (ie, oncologist visits, hospital outpatient costs, and prescription drug cost) but higher use and cost in acute services (ie, ED). Compared with residency in a metropolitan area, living in a nonmetropolitan area was associated with fewer physician visits but higher ED visits and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The cooccurrence of lower utilization of routine care services, along with higher utilization of acute care services among some individuals, has implications for patient burden and warrants further study.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Medicare , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/economía , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/terapia , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis ; 11(3): 710-720, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706287

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The potential for greenness as a novel protective factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) requires further exploration. OBJECTIVES: This study assesses prospectively and longitudinally the association between precision greenness - greenness measured at the micro-environmental level, defined as the Census block - and AD incidence. DESIGN: Older adults living in consistently high greenness Census blocks across 2011 and 2016 were compared to those living in consistently low greenness blocks on AD incidence during 2012-2016. SETTING: Miami-Dade County, Florida, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 230,738 U.S. Medicare beneficiaries. MEASUREMENTS: U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Chronic Condition Algorithm for AD based on ICD-9 codes, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, age, sex, race/ethnicity, neighborhood income, and walkability. RESULTS: Older adults living in the consistently high greenness tertile, compared to those in the consistently low greenness tertile, had 16% lower odds of AD incidence (OR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.76-0.94, p=0.0014), adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and neighborhood income. Age, neighborhood income and walkability moderated greenness' relationship to odds of AD incidence, such that younger ages (65-74), lower-income, and non-car dependent neighborhoods may benefit most from high greenness. CONCLUSIONS: High greenness, compared to low greenness, is associated with lower 5-year AD incidence. Residents who are younger and/or who reside in lower-income, walkable neighborhoods may benefit the most from high greenness. These findings suggest that consistently high greenness at the Census block-level, may be associated with reduced odds of AD incidence at a population level.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Humanos , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Florida/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Incidencia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Características del Vecindario , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Características de la Residencia , Estudios Prospectivos
14.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(5): 659-665, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709973

RESUMEN

We investigated county-level variation in mRNA COVID-19 vaccine use among Medicare beneficiaries throughout the United States. There was greater use of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines than Moderna vaccines in urban areas for first and booster doses.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Medicare , Población Rural , Población Urbana , Humanos , Estados Unidos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Vacuna BNT162 , SARS-CoV-2
15.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(5S Suppl 3): S340-S344, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689416

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the trends of Medicare physician reimbursement from 2011 to 2021 and compare the rates across different surgical specialties. BACKGROUND: Knowledge of Medicare is essential because of its significant contribution in physician reimbursements. Previous studies across surgical specialties have demonstrated that Medicare, despite keeping up with inflation in some areas, has remained flat when accounting for physician reimbursement. STUDY DESIGN: The Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary data for the calendar year 2021 were queried to extract the top 50% of Current Procedural Terminology codes based on case volume. The Physician Fee Schedule look-up tool was accessed, and the physician reimbursement fee was abstracted. Weighted mean reimbursement was adjusted for inflation. Growth rate and compound annual growth rate were calculated. Projection of future inflation and reimbursement rates were also calculated using the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. RESULTS: After adjusting for inflation, the weighted mean reimbursement across surgical specialties decreased by -22.5%. The largest reimbursement decrease was within the field of general surgery (-33.3%), followed by otolaryngology (-31.5%), vascular surgery (-23.3%), and plastic surgery (-22.8%). There was a significant decrease in median case volume across all specialties between 2011 and 2021 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that, when adjusted for inflation, over the study period, there has been a consistent decrease in reimbursement for all specialties analyzed. Awareness of the current downward trends in Medicare physician reimbursement should be a priority for all surgeons, as means of advocating for compensation and to maintain surgical care feasible and accessible to all patients.


Asunto(s)
Medicare , Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Estados Unidos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/economía , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Inflación Económica , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Tabla de Aranceles/economía
16.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e249465, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709533

RESUMEN

Importance: The influence of race and ethnicity on initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is relatively understudied in Medicare data. Objective: To investigate disparities in the initiation of DOACs compared with warfarin by race, ethnicity, and social vulnerability. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used a 50% sample of Medicare fee-for-service data from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019 (mean patient enrollment duration, 7.7 years). Analysis took place between January 2023 and February 2024. A cohort of older adults (aged ≥65 years) with atrial fibrillation who newly initiated warfarin or DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) was identified. Exposure: Patients were classified as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The likelihood of starting use of DOACs compared with warfarin was modeled, adjusting for race, ethnicity, age, sex, county-level social vulnerability, and other clinical factors. Results: Among 950 698 anticoagulation initiations, consisting of 680 974 DOAC users and 269 724 warfarin users (mean [SD] age, 78.5 [7.6] years; 52.6% female), 5.2% were Black, 4.3% were Hispanic, and 86.7% were White. During the 10-year study period, DOAC use increased for all demographic groups. After adjustment, compared with White patients, Black patients were 23% less likely (adjusted odds ratio [AOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.75-0.79) and Hispanic patients were 13% less likely (AOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85-0.89) to initiate DOAC use. Disparities in DOAC initiation were greatest among Black patients in the earlier years but attenuated during the study period. For instance, in 2010, the OR of Black patients initiating DOACs was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50-0.57), attenuating linearly over time to 0.69 by 2013 (95% CI, 0.65-0.74) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.89) by 2017. By 2019, these differences became nonsignificant (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.99-1.18). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Medicare patients with atrial fibrillation, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to initiate DOACs for atrial fibrillation, although these differences diminished over time. Identifying the factors behind these early disparities is crucial for ensuring equitable access to novel therapies as they emerge for Black and Hispanic populations.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Medicare , Warfarina , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Dabigatrán/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Piridinas/uso terapéutico
17.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(9): e029691, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700013

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in patients with kidney failure, and their risk of cardiovascular events is 10 to 20 times higher as compared with the general population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 508 822 patients who initiated dialysis between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2014 using the United States Renal Data System with linked Medicare claims. We determined hospitalization rates for cardiovascular events, defined by acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, and stroke. We examined the association of sex with outcome of cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death using adjusted time-to-event models. The mean age was 70±12 years and 44.7% were women. The cardiovascular event rate was 232 per thousand person-years (95% CI, 231-233), with a higher rate in women than in men (248 per thousand person-years [95% CI, 247-250] versus 219 per thousand person-years [95% CI, 217-220]). Women had a 14% higher risk of cardiovascular events than men (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.13-1.16]). Women had a 16% higher risk of heart failure (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.15-1.18]), a 31% higher risk of stroke (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.28-1.34]), and no difference in risk of acute coronary syndrome (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.99-1.03]). Women had a lower risk of cardiovascular death (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.88-0.90]) and a lower risk of all-cause death than men (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.95-0.97]). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing dialysis, women have a higher risk of cardiovascular events of heart failure and stroke than men. Women have a lower adjusted risk of cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Causas de Muerte , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Diálisis Renal , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal/mortalidad
18.
Colorectal Dis ; 26(5): 1028-1037, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38581083

RESUMEN

AIM: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in the United States remain persistently below guideline targets, partly due to suboptimal patient utilization and provider reimbursement. To guide long-term national utilization estimates and set reasonable screening adherence targets, this study aimed to quantify trends in utilization of and reimbursement for CRC screenings using Medicare claims. METHOD: Inflation-adjusted reimbursements and utilization volume associated with each CRC screening code were abstracted from Medicare claims between 2000 and 2019. Screenings, screenings/100 000 enrolees and reimbursement/screening were analysed with linear regression and compared with the equality of slopes tests. Average reimbursement per screening was compared using analysis of variance with Dunnett's T3 multiple comparisons test. RESULTS: The growth rate of multitarget stool DNA tests (mt-sDNA)/100 000 was the highest at 170.4 screenings/year (R2 = 0.99, p ≤ 0.001), while that of faecal occult blood tests/100 000 was the lowest at -446.4 screenings/year (R2 = 0.90, p ≤ 0.001) (p ≤ 0.001). Provider reimbursements averaged $546.95 (95% CI $520.12-$573.78) per mt-sDNA screening, significantly higher than reimbursements for all invasive screenings. Only FOBTs significantly increased in reimbursement per screening at $0.62/year (R2 = 0.91, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: We derived forecastable trend numbers for utilization and provider reimbursement. Faecal immunochemical tests/100 000 and mt-sDNA screenings/100 000 increased most rapidly during the entire study period. The number of nearly all invasive screenings/100 000 decreased rapidly; the number of colonoscopies/100 000 increased slightly, probably due to superior diagnostic strength. These trends indicate the that replacement of other invasive modalities with accessible noninvasive screenings will account for much of future screening behaviour and thus reductions in CRC incidence and mortality, especially given providers' reimbursement incentive to screen average-risk patients with stool-based tests.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Medicare , Sangre Oculta , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Estados Unidos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/tendencias , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Heces , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Colonoscopía/economía , Colonoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Colonoscopía/tendencias , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/tendencias , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e248889, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662368

RESUMEN

Importance: With older drivers representing the fastest growing segment of the driver population and dementia prevalence increasing with age, policymakers face the challenge of balancing road safety and mobility of older adults. In states that require reporting a dementia diagnosis to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), individuals with dementia may be reluctant to disclose symptoms of cognitive decline, and clinicians may be reluctant to probe for those symptoms, which may be associated with missed or delayed diagnoses. Objective: To assess whether DMV reporting policies for drivers with dementia are associated with primary care clinicians' underdiagnosing dementia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the 100% Medicare fee-for-service program and the Medicare Advantage plans from 2017 to 2019 on 223 036 primary care clinicians with at least 25 Medicare patients. Statistical analysis was performed from July to October 2023. Exposures: State DMV reporting policies for drivers with dementia. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was a binary variable indicating whether the clinician underdiagnosed dementia or not. Each clinician's expected number of dementia cases was estimated using a predictive model based on patient characteristics. Comparing the estimation with observed dementia diagnoses identified clinicians who underdiagnosed dementia vs those who did not, after accounting for sampling errors. Results: Four states have clinician reporting mandates, 14 have mandates requiring drivers to self-report dementia diagnoses, and 32 states and the District of Columbia do not have explicit requirements. Among primary care clinicians in states with clinician reporting mandates (n = 35 620), 51.4% were female, 91.9% worked in a metropolitan area, and 19.9% of the patient panel were beneficiaries dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Among primary care clinicians in states with patient self-reporting mandates (n = 57 548), 55.7% were female, 83.1% worked in a metropolitan area, and 15.4% of the patient panel were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Among clinicians in states without mandates, 55.7% were female, 83.0% worked in a metropolitan area, and 14.6% of the patient panel were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Clinicians in states with clinician reporting mandates had an adjusted 12.4% (95% CI, 10.5%-14.2%) probability of underdiagnosing dementia compared with 7.8% (95% CI, 6.9%-8.7%) in states with self-reporting and 7.7% (95% CI, 6.9%-8.4%) in states with no mandates, an approximately 4-percentage point difference (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cross-sectional study of primary care clinicians suggest that mandatory DMV policies for clinicians to report patients with dementia may be associated with a higher risk of missed or delayed dementia diagnoses. Future research is needed to better understand the unintended consequences and the risk-benefit tradeoffs of these policies.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Medicare , Humanos , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Estados Unidos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducción de Automóvil/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conducción de Automóvil/estadística & datos numéricos , Notificación Obligatoria , Anciano de 80 o más Años
20.
Menopause ; 31(5): 363-371, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38595196

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to assess the use of menopausal hormone therapy beyond age 65 years and its health implications by types of estrogen/progestogen, routes of administration, and dose strengths. METHODS: Using prescription drug and encounter records of 10 million senior Medicare women from 2007-2020 and Cox regression analyses adjusted for time-varying characteristics of the women, we examined the effects of different preparations of menopausal hormone therapy on all-cause mortality, five cancers, six cardiovascular diseases, and dementia. RESULTS: Compared with never use or discontinuation of menopausal hormone therapy after age 65 years, the use of estrogen monotherapy beyond age 65 years was associated with significant risk reductions in mortality (19% or adjusted hazards ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.79-0.82), breast cancer (16%), lung cancer (13%), colorectal cancer (12%), congestive heart failure (CHF) (5%), venous thromboembolism (3%), atrial fibrillation (4%), acute myocardial infarction (11%), and dementia (2%). For the use of estrogen and progestogen combo-therapy, both E+ progestin and E+ progesterone were associated with increased risk of breast cancer by 10%-19%, but such risk can be mitigated using low dose of transdermal or vaginal E+ progestin. Moreover, E+ progestin exhibited significant risk reductions in endometrial cancer (45% or adjusted hazards ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.50-0.60), ovarian cancer (21%), ischemic heart disease (5%), CHF (5%), and venous thromboembolism (5%), whereas E+ progesterone exhibited risk reduction only in CHF (4%). CONCLUSIONS: Among senior Medicare women, the implications of menopausal hormone therapy use beyond age 65 years vary by types, routes, and strengths. In general, risk reductions appear to be greater with low rather than medium or high doses, vaginal or transdermal rather than oral preparations, and with E2 rather than conjugated estrogen.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno , Salud de la Mujer , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/métodos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Progestinas/administración & dosificación , Progestinas/efectos adversos , Menopausia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estrógenos/administración & dosificación , Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Demencia/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA