RESUMEN
Reproductive failure due to age, genetics and disease necessitates innovative solutions. While reproductive tissue transplantation has advanced, ongoing research seeks superior approaches. Biomaterials, bioengineering and additive manufacturing, such as three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, are harnessed to restore reproductive function. 3D bioprinting uses materials, cells and growth factors to mimic natural tissues, proving popular for tissue engineering, notably in complex scaffold creation with cell distribution. The versatility which is brought to reproductive medicine by 3D bioprinting allows more accurate and on-site applicability to various problems that are encountered in the field. However, in the literature, there is a lack of studies encompassing the valuable applications of 3D bioprinting in reproductive medicine. This systematic review aims to improve understanding, and focuses on applications in several branches of reproductive medicine. Advancements span the restoration of ovarian function, endometrial regeneration, vaginal reconstruction, and male germ cell bioengineering. 3D bioprinting holds untapped potential in reproductive medicine.
Asunto(s)
Bioimpresión , Impresión Tridimensional , Medicina Reproductiva , Ingeniería de Tejidos , Humanos , Medicina Reproductiva/métodos , Medicina Reproductiva/tendencias , Bioimpresión/métodos , Ingeniería de Tejidos/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Andamios del TejidoRESUMEN
The prevalence of obesity has doubled among reproductive-age adults in the US over the past 40 years and is projected to impact half of the population by 2030. Obesity is associated with a twofold to threefold increase in infertility, largely because of anovulation, and is associated with a lower rate of pregnancy with ovulation induction among anovulatory women. As a result of these trends and associations, in vitro fertilization (IVF) care will need to be adapted to provide safe, effective, and equitable access for patients with obesity. Research over the past 10 years has demonstrated safe sedation practices and effective procedure modifications for oocyte retrievals and embryo transfers in patients with obesity undergoing IVF treatment. We encourage IVF medical directors to revisit body mass index restrictions for IVF treatment in favor of individualized patient risk assessments to minimize weight bias and provide timely access to safe and effective IVF care for patients with obesity and infertility.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Fertilización In Vitro , Obesidad , Medicina Reproductiva , Humanos , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Femenino , Embarazo , Obesidad/terapia , Obesidad/epidemiología , Medicina Reproductiva/métodos , Medicina Reproductiva/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de EmbarazoRESUMEN
Although much of the foundational basic scientific and clinical research was conducted in the United States, the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) birth occurred in the United Kingdom. Why? For centuries, all research surrounding the field of "reproduction" has elicited bipolar passionate responses by the American public, and the issue of "test tube babies" has been no different. The history of conception in the United States is defined by complex interrelationships among scientists, clinicians, and politically charged decisions by various branches of the US government. With a focus on research in the United States, this review summarizes the early scientific and clinical advances important to the development of IVF and then addresses the potential future developments in IVF. We also consider what future advances are possible in the United States given the current regulations, laws, and funding.
Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro , Fertilización , Humanos , Fertilización In Vitro/historia , Fertilización In Vitro/tendencias , Estados Unidos , Política , Reproducción , Medicina Reproductiva/tendenciasAsunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Fertilización In Vitro/tendencias , Infertilidad/terapia , Medicina Reproductiva/tendencias , Terapias en Investigación/tendencias , Automatización de Laboratorios , Difusión de Innovaciones , Predicción , Humanos , Infertilidad/diagnóstico , Infertilidad/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify changes in current practice patterns, salaries, and satisfaction by gender and by years in practice among board-certified reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) subspecialists in the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional web-based survey including 37 questions conducted by the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measures were total compensation and practice patterns compared by gender and the type of practice. The secondary outcomes included demographics, the number of in vitro fertilization cycles, surgeries performed, and the morale of survey respondents. RESULT(S): There were 370 respondents (48.4% women and 51.4% men). Compared with a similar survey conducted 6 years earlier, a 27% increase in the number of female respondents was observed in this survey. There was a marginally significant trend toward lower compensation for female than male REI subspecialists (17% lower, $472,807 vs. $571,969). The gap was seen for responders with ≥10 years' experience, which is also when there was the largest gap between private and academic practice (mean $820,997 vs, $391,600). Most (77%) felt positively about the current state of the reproductive endocrinology field, and >90% would choose the subspecialty again. CONCLUSION(S): There has been a substantial increase in the number of recent female REI subspecialists showing less disparity in compensation, and the gap appears to be closing. There is an increasing gap in compensation between private and academic practices with ≥5 years of experience. Reproductive endocrinology and infertility remains a high morale specialty.
Asunto(s)
Endocrinólogos/tendencias , Endocrinología/tendencias , Equidad de Género/tendencias , Infertilidad/terapia , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Medicina Reproductiva/tendencias , Sexismo/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Selección de Profesión , Estudios Transversales , Endocrinólogos/economía , Endocrinología/economía , Femenino , Equidad de Género/economía , Humanos , Infertilidad/diagnóstico , Infertilidad/fisiopatología , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos Mujeres/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Medicina Reproductiva/economía , Salarios y Beneficios/tendencias , Sexismo/economía , Especialización/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Mujeres TrabajadorasRESUMEN
Healthcare teams must be deliberately cultivated to reach their full potential. Shifting focus from individual performance to a team's collective competence allows for targeted and evidence-based interventions that support teamwork and improve patient outcomes. We reviewed essential concepts drawn from team science and explored the practical applications of teaming. Reproductive endocrinology and infertility healthcare providers play a pivotal role by teaching, modeling, and fostering teaming attitudes and behaviors. Through teaming, we can maximize our teams' ability to learn, innovate, compete with other teams, and thrive in today's healthcare environment.
Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/educación , Invenciones , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Medicina Reproductiva , Competencia Clínica , Endocrinología/educación , Endocrinología/organización & administración , Femenino , Personal de Salud/organización & administración , Personal de Salud/normas , Humanos , Invenciones/tendencias , Aprendizaje , Masculino , Embarazo , Medicina Reproductiva/educación , Medicina Reproductiva/organización & administración , Medicina Reproductiva/tendencias , Terapias en Investigación/tendenciasAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Instituciones de Salud/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Máscaras/tendencias , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/tendencias , Medicina Reproductiva/tendencias , Telemedicina/tendencias , Tasa de Natalidad/tendencias , Humanos , Aceptación de la Atención de SaludAsunto(s)
Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Médicos/tendencias , Medicina Reproductiva/tendencias , Equilibrio entre Vida Personal y Laboral/tendencias , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Atención al Paciente/normas , Médicos/normas , Medicina Reproductiva/normas , Equilibrio entre Vida Personal y Laboral/normas , Carga de Trabajo/normasRESUMEN
The goal of this Views and Reviews is to let colleagues and leaders well versed in the African American experience in reproductive medicine address the problems of racism affecting our trainees and patients and, more significantly, propose solutions. The areas in reproductive medicine that will be explored from the African American perspective include the pipeline of providers, health disparities, and access to infertility treatment.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Racismo , Medicina Reproductiva , Negro o Afroamericano/etnología , Negro o Afroamericano/historia , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/ética , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/historia , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Esclavización/ética , Esclavización/historia , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/ética , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/historia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/ética , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/historia , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Infertilidad/etnología , Infertilidad/historia , Infertilidad/terapia , Masculino , Relaciones Médico-Paciente/ética , Racismo/ética , Racismo/historia , Racismo/prevención & control , Medicina Reproductiva/educación , Medicina Reproductiva/ética , Medicina Reproductiva/historia , Medicina Reproductiva/tendencias , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the interventional clinical trials in infertility and to assess whether trial location or industry sponsorship was associated with trial noncompletion. DESIGN: Retrospective review of trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. SETTING: None. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Descriptive statistics characterizing the attributes of the clinical trials including intervention type, topic, population, completion status, size, location, sponsor, and results. The effects of the sponsor and trial location on trial noncompletion were assessed via logistic regression. RESULT(S): In total, 505 trials initiated between 2010 and 2020 were included in our analysis. Drug interventions were the most commonly studied (45%); ovarian stimulation trials accounted for 27% of the studies. Live birth was tracked as an outcome by 20% of the studies; 3% of the trials included mental health outcomes. Few trials (15%) enrolled male participants. Only 11% of the trials reported results, and 4% of the trials reported the race or ethnicity of the participants. Most trials (82%) were conducted outside the United States. Overall, 18% of the trials were not completed, most often because of lack of accrual (47%). United States trials had over twice the odds of noncompletion in univariate analysis (odds ratio = 2.48, 95% confidence interval = [1.47, 4.17]); however, this relationship lost significance after adjusting for potential confounders (odds ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval = [0.42, 2.14]). Trial sponsorship was not associated with trial noncompletion. CONCLUSION(S): Infertility trials predominantly investigated drug interventions, particularly ovarian stimulation. Live birth was an infrequent outcome despite its relevance to patients. Clinical trials should aim to address the unmet needs in fertility care and be inclusive of underserved populations affected by infertility.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Infertilidad/terapia , Medicina Reproductiva/tendencias , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/tendencias , Proyectos de Investigación/tendencias , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/economía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Difusión de Innovaciones , Determinación de Punto Final/tendencias , Femenino , Fertilidad , Sector de Atención de Salud , Humanos , Infertilidad/diagnóstico , Infertilidad/economía , Infertilidad/fisiopatología , Nacimiento Vivo , Masculino , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Medicina Reproductiva/economía , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/economía , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created havoc on the socio-economic aspect of the world. With billions of lives being affected by this wrecking pandemic, global fertility services were also not left untouched by its impact. The possibility of sexual transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus, its impact on male and female fertility, pregnancy, its potential teratogenic effect, and handling of gametes in the clinical laboratories were major concerns among reproductive medicine specialists, which led down all the reproductive health services, including IUI, IVF/ICSI in most of the countries. Even the people did not intend to conceive during the pandemic crisis and were hesitant to avail such services. Discrete evidence regarding the pathophysiology of COVID-19 infection and its impact on the human reproductive system is not very clear. In this review article, we intend to incorporate all the evidence related to the COVID-19 infection and its impact on human reproduction available to date. It is our responsibility to provide rightful information and to keep our patients familiar with the existing lack of clear evidence. In this COVID-19 era, it is important that the fertility management be prioritized in sub-fertile couples with diminished fertility reserve and high-risk conditions, like malignancies, that may affect their long-term fertility prospects.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Genitales , Infertilidad/etiología , Pandemias , Medicina Reproductiva/tendencias , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Reproductivos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/tendencias , Animales , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Humanos , Infertilidad/terapia , Masculino , EmbarazoAsunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Medicina Reproductiva , Investigación Biomédica/historia , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Difusión de Innovaciones , Políticas Editoriales , Femenino , Predicción , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Factor de Impacto de la Revista , Masculino , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/historia , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/tendencias , Embarazo , Medicina Reproductiva/historia , Medicina Reproductiva/tendenciasRESUMEN
The goal of this Views and Interviews series was to bring together the thought leaders in the field and envision what the laboratory will look like in the future. This consensus piece strives to take the thoughts of those leaders and develop themes and concepts that will be significant in the laboratory in the coming years.