Why Monoamine Oxidase B Preferably Metabolizes N-Methylhistamine over Histamine: Evidence from the Multiscale Simulation of the Rate-Limiting Step.

Histamine levels in the human brain are controlled by rather peculiar metabolic pathways. In the first step, histamine is enzymatically methylated at its imidazole Nτ atom, and the produced N-methylhistamine undergoes an oxidative deamination catalyzed by monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B), as is common with other monoaminergic neurotransmitters and neuromodulators of the central nervous system. The fact that histamine requires such a conversion prior to oxidative deamination is intriguing since MAO-B is known to be relatively promiscuous towards monoaminergic substrates; its in-vitro oxidation of N-methylhistamine is about 10 times faster than that for histamine, yet this rather subtle difference appears to be governing the decomposition pathway. This work clarifies the MAO-B selectivity toward histamine and N-methylhistamine by multiscale simulations of the rate-limiting hydride abstraction step for both compounds in the gas phase, in aqueous solution, and in the enzyme, using the established empirical valence bond methodology, assisted by gas-phase density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The computed barriers are in very good agreement with experimental kinetic data, especially for relative trends among systems, thereby reproducing the observed MAO-B selectivity. Simulations clearly demonstrate that solvation effects govern the reactivity, both in aqueous solution as well as in the enzyme although with an opposing effect on the free energy barrier. In the aqueous solution, the transition-state structure involving histamine is better solvated than its methylated analog, leading to a lower barrier for histamine oxidation. In the enzyme, the higher hydrophobicity of N-methylhistamine results in a decreased number of water molecules at the active side, leading to decreased dielectric shielding of the preorganized catalytic electrostatic environment provided by the enzyme. This renders the catalytic environment more efficient for N-methylhistamine, giving rise to a lower barrier relative to histamine. In addition, the transition state involving N-methylhistamine appears to be stabilized by the surrounding nonpolar residues to a larger extent than with unsubstituted histamine, contributing to a lower barrier with the former.

Relevance of Hydrogen Bonds for the Histamine H2 Receptor-Ligand Interactions: A Lesson from Deuteration.

We used a combination of density functional theory (DFT) calculations and the implicit quantization of the acidic N-H and O-H bonds to assess the effect of deuteration on the binding of agonists (2-methylhistamine and 4-methylhistamine) and antagonists (cimetidine and famotidine) to the histamine H2 receptor. The results show that deuteration significantly increases the affinity for 4-methylhistamine and reduces it for 2-methylhistamine, while leaving it unchanged for both antagonists, which is found in excellent agreement with experiments. The revealed trends are interpreted in the light of the altered strength of the hydrogen bonding upon deuteration, known as the Ubbelohde effect, which affects ligand interactions with both active sites residues and solvent molecules preceding the binding, thus providing strong evidence for the relevance of hydrogen bonding for this process. In addition, computations further underline an important role of the Tyr250 residue for the binding. The obtained insight is relevant for the therapy in the context of (per)deuterated drugs that are expected to enter therapeutic practice in the near future, while this approach may contribute towards understanding receptor activation and its discrimination between agonists and antagonists.

Identification of Histamine H3 Receptor Ligands Using a New Crystal Structure Fragment-based Method.

Virtual screening offers an efficient alternative to high-throughput screening in the identification of pharmacological tools and lead compounds. Virtual screening is typically based on the matching of target structures or ligand pharmacophores to commercial or in-house compound catalogues. This study provides the first proof-of-concept for our recently reported method where pharmacophores are instead constructed based on the inference of residue-ligand fragments from crystal structures. We demonstrate its unique utility for G protein-coupled receptors, which represent the largest families of human membrane proteins and drug targets. We identified five neutral antagonists and one inverse agonist for the histamine H3 receptor with potencies of 0.7-8.5 µM in a recombinant receptor cell-based inositol phosphate accumulation assay and validated their activity using a radioligand competition binding assay. H3 receptor antagonism is of large therapeutic value and our ligands could serve as starting points for further lead optimisation. The six ligands exhibit four chemical scaffolds, whereof three have high novelty in comparison to the known H3 receptor ligands in the ChEMBL database. The complete pharmacophore fragment library is freely available through the GPCR database, GPCRdb, allowing the successful application herein to be repeated for most of the 285 class A GPCR targets. The method could also easily be adapted to other protein families.

What a Difference a Methyl Group Makes: The Selectivity of Monoamine Oxidase†B Towards Histamine and N-Methylhistamine.

Monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzymes catalyze the degradation of a very broad range of biogenic and dietary amines including many neurotransmitters in the brain, whose imbalance is extensively linked with the biochemical pathology of various neurological disorders. Although sharing around 70 % sequence identity, both MAO A and B isoforms differ in substrate affinities and inhibitor sensitivities. Inhibitors that act on MAO A are used to treat depression, due to their ability to raise serotonin concentrations, whereas MAO B inhibitors decrease dopamine degradation and improve motor control in patients with Parkinson disease. Despite this functional importance, the factors affecting MAO selectivity are poorly understood. Here, we used a combination of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, molecular mechanics with Poisson-Boltzmann and surface area solvation (MM-PBSA) binding free energy evaluations, and quantum mechanical (QM) cluster calculations to address the unexpected, yet challenging MAO B selectivity for N-methylhistamine (NMH) over histamine (HIS), differing only in a single methyl group distant from the reactive ethylamino center. This study shows that a dominant selectivity contribution is offered by a lower activation free energy for NMH by 2.6 kcal mol-1 , in excellent agreement with the experimental ΔΔG≠EXP =1.4 kcal mol-1 , together with a more favorable reaction exergonicity and active-site binding. This study also confirms the hydrophobic nature of the MAO B active site and underlines the important role of Ile199, Leu171, and Leu328 in properly orienting substrates for the reaction.

Effect of H4R antagonist N-(2-aminoethyl)-5-chloro-1H-indol-2-carboxamides and 5-chloro-2-(piperazin-1-ylmethyl)-1H-benzimidazole on histamine and 4-methylhistamine-induced mast cell response.

CONTEXT: The histamine plays a decisive role in acute and chronic inflammatory responses and is regulated through its four types of distinct receptors designated from H1 to H4. Recently histamine 4 receptor (H4R) antagonists have been reported to possess various pharmacological effects against various allergic diseases. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the inhibitory effect of N-(2-aminoethyl)-5-chloro-1H-indol-2-carboxamide (Compound A) and 5-chloro-2-(piperazin-1-ylmethyl)-1H-benzimidazole (Compound L) on H4R-mediated calcium mobilization, cytokine IL-13 production, ERK1/2, Akt and NF-κB activation in human mastocytoma cells-1 (HMC-1). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Compounds A and L were synthesized chemically and their inhibitory effect on intracellular calcium release was analyzed by Fluo-4 calcium assay, cytokine measurement through ELISA and activation of signaling molecules by western blot. RESULTS: Pre-treatment with compounds A and L significantly reduced the H4R-mediated intracellular calcium release. Histamine and 4-methylhistamine (4-MH) induced Th2 cytokine IL-13 production in HMC-1 cells, was inhibited by compound A (77.61%, 74.25% at 1 µM concentration) and compound L (79.63%, 81.70% at 1 µM concentration). Furthermore, histamine induced the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, Akt and NF-κB was suppressed by compounds A and L at varying levels, ERK1/2 (88%, 86%), Akt (88%, 89%) and NF-κB (89%, 87%) in HMC-1 cells. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Taken together these data demonstrate that compound A and compound L may block H4R-mediated downstream signaling events.

Role of a histamine 4 receptor as an anti-inflammatory target in carrageenan-induced pleurisy in mice.

The histamine 4 receptor (H4R) is expressed primarily on cells involved in inflammation and immune responses. Despite much research into inflammatory diseases, no drugs with favourable safety profiles are yet available for their treatment. The aim of the present study was to determine the potential anti-inflammatory effect of 4-methylhistamine (4-MeH) or JNJ77777120 (JNJ) and to explore the role of H4R in a mouse model of carrageenan (Cg) -induced pleurisy. A single dose of 4-MeH or JNJ (30 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally 1 hr before Cg administration. The results illustrate that both the numbers of CD4(+) , CD25(+) , CD4(+)  CD25(+) , GITR(+) , GITR(+)  IL-17A(+) -expressing T cells and the levels of T helper type 1 (Th1)/Th17 cytokines were markedly increased in both the Cg-treated and 4-MeH-treated groups, whereas the cytokines produced by Th2 cells were significantly decreased in the same groups. However, JNJ treatment significantly decreased both the number of T-cell subsets and GITR(+) , GITR(+)  IL-17A(+) -expressing T cells, and the production of Th1/Th17 cytokines. Further, JNJ up-regulated the expression of the Th2 cytokines. RT-PCR analysis revealed an increased expression of interleukin-1ß, tumour necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in the Cg-treated and 4-MeH-treated groups, which was reduced by treatment with JNJ in lung tissues. Moreover, histological examinations revealed anti-inflammatory effects of JNJ, whereas 4-MeH worsened Cg-induced inflammation. In conclusion, the results of the present work clearly indicate that JNJ possesses important anti-inflammatory properties that are increased in 4-MeH-treated mice, suggesting that H4R are involved in pleurisy and that JNJ has an anti-inflammatory effect in associated disease conditions.

Synthesis and structural and pharmacological properties of cyclopropane-based conformationally restricted analogs of 4-methylhistamine as histamine H3/H4 receptor ligands.

On the basis of the previous results on a histamine H(4) receptor agonist 4-methylhistamine and a cyclopropane-based conformationally restricted analog CEIC (3) with potent H(3)/H(4) receptor antagonistic effect, 4-methylhistamine analogs 4 and 5 of CEIC were designed and synthesized. Compound 4 showed strong affinity (K(i)=38.7 nM) for the H(3) receptor, which was more potent than a well-known H(3) antagonist thioperamide. Stable tautomer and conformation of 3 and 4, which can affect the pharmacological activity, were analyzed by ab initio calculations.

Generation of a homology model of the human histamine H(3) receptor for ligand docking and pharmacophore-based screening.

The human histamine H(3) receptor (hH(3)R) is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR), which modulates the release of various neurotransmitters in the central and peripheral nervous system and therefore is a potential target in the therapy of numerous diseases. Although ligands addressing this receptor are already known, the discovery of alternative lead structures represents an important goal in drug design. The goal of this work was to study the hH(3)R and its antagonists by means of molecular modelling tools. For this purpose, a strategy was pursued in which a homology model of the hH(3)R based on the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin was generated and refined by molecular dynamics simulations in a dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC)/water membrane mimic before the resulting binding pocket was used for high-throughput docking using the program GOLD. Alternatively, a pharmacophore-based procedure was carried out where the alleged bioactive conformations of three different potent hH(3)R antagonists were used as templates for the generation of pharmacophore models. A pharmacophore-based screening was then carried out using the program Catalyst. Based upon a database of 418 validated hH(3)R antagonists both strategies could be validated in respect of their performance. Seven hits obtained during this screening procedure were commercially purchased, and experimentally tested in a [(3)H]N(alpha)-methylhistamine binding assay. The compounds tested showed affinities at hH(3)R with K ( i ) values ranging from 0.079 to 6.3 muM.

Structure-activity relationships of histamine H1-receptor agonists.

Significant progress in the development of potent and selective histamine H1-receptor agonists has been achieved since 1990. Optimisation of the class of 2-phenylhistamines has furnished 2-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]histamine and its Nalpha-methyl derivative. The discovery of histaprodifen (2-[2-(3,3-diphenylpropyl)-1H-imidazol-4-yl]ethanamine) and the novel lead compound suprahistaprodifen (Nalpha-2-[(1H-imidazol-4-yl)ethyl]histaprodifen) represents additional milestones in the H1-receptor agonist field.

Azomethine prodrugs of (R)-alpha-methylhistamine, a highly potent and selective histamine H3-receptor agonist.

The histamine H3 receptor is considered a potential target for novel drugs as it regulates the activity of various neurotransmitters in the peripheral and the central nervous system. Particularly H3-receptor agonists have been suggested to become valuable drugs for the treatment of several CNS disorders, inflammatory and acid related diseases. Due to its strong basicity and polarity the highly potent and selective histamine H3-receptor agonist (R)-alpha-methylhistamine hardly penetrates biological membranes and is furthermore rapidly inactivated in vivo. Thus, lipophilic, non-basic azomethine prodrugs of (R)-alpha--methylhistamine have been developed to overcome its pharmacokinetic disadvantages. This bioreversible derivatization decreased its basicity, increased its lipophilicity and reduced its metabolization. As a result the biological half-life was prolonged and oral absorption as well as penetration into the brain were significantly increased. By systematic variation of the pro-moiety we were able to optimize the pharmacokinetic properties which allow for both peripheral and central delivery of the parent amine. The azomethine prodrugs described herein display satisfactory stability to be orally administered while being adequately labile to deliver (R)-alpha-methylhistamine at sufficient concentrations in vivo. At present, these azomethines not only serve as valuable tools for pharmacological studies related to the histamine H3 receptor, but also represent a promising approach to achieve therapeutic application of the histamine H3-receptor agonist (R)-alpha-methylhistamine. Currently the parent compound of the prodrugs is under clinical development phase II.

Novel histaprodifen analogues as potent histamine H1-receptor agonists in the pithed and in the anaesthetized rat.

We have shown previously that histaprodifen and its Nalpha-substituted analogues methylhistaprodifen and dimethylhistaprodifen are highly potent H1-receptor agonists in vivo. The aim of the present study was to examine the influence of four newly synthesized histaprodifen analogues, 3-fluoro-methylhistaprodifen (1), Nalpha-imidazolylethylhistaprodifen (2), bis-histaprodifen (3) and Nalpha-methyl-bis-histaprodifen (4), on the cardiovascular system in the pithed and in the anaesthetized rat. In pithed and vagotomized rats, diastolic blood pressure (which was increased to 80-85 mmHg by vasopressin infusion) was decreased dose dependently by methylhistaprodifen (the reference compound) and by compounds 1-4. The maximum decrease was about 47-50 mmHg for methylhistaprodifen and compounds 1, 2 and 3. Their potencies, expressed as pED50 (the negative logarithm of the dose in mole per kilogram body weight that decreased diastolic blood pressure by 25 mmHg), were 8.31, 8.23, 8.26 and 7.84, respectively. With compound 4 the maximal effect was not achieved at doses up to 1 micromol/kg (the latter dose decreased blood pressure by about 30 mmHg; pED50 approximately 6.5). The vasodepressor effect of the five compounds was attenuated by the H1-receptor antagonist dimetindene (1 micromol/kg) but was not changed by combined administration of the H2- and H3-receptor antagonists ranitidine and thioperamide (1 micromol/kg each), by combined administration of the alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonists prazosin and rauwolscine (1 micromol/kg each) or by the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol (3 micromol/kg). In anaesthetized rats methylhistaprodifen and compounds 1-4 induced almost the same fall in blood pressure as in pithed and vagotomized animals; the effects were sensitive to blockade by dimetindene (1 micromol/kg). Higher doses of compounds 1 and 2 (1 micromol/kg) increased heart rate in pithed and vagotomized rats in a manner sensitive to propranolol (3 micromol/kg) but insensitive to dimetindene (3 micromol/kg). The same dose of methylhistaprodifen and of compounds 3 and 4 failed to affect heart rate. We conclude that the agonistic potency of compounds 1 and 2 at H1-receptors in the cardiovascular system of the rat equals that of methylhistaprodifen, the most potent histamine H1-receptor agonist available until recently. Compounds 1 and 2 exhibit sympathomimetic activity at high doses.

Histaprodifens: synthesis, pharmacological in vitro evaluation, and molecular modeling of a new class of highly active and selective histamine H(1)-receptor agonists.

A new class of histamine analogues characterized by a 3, 3-diphenylpropyl substituent at the 2-position of the imidazole nucleus has been prepared outgoing from 4,4-diphenylbutyronitrile (4b) via cyclization of the corresponding methyl imidate 5b with 2-oxo-4-phthalimido-1-butyl acetate or 2-oxo-1,4-butandiol in liquid ammonia, followed by standard reactions. The title compounds displayed partial agonism on contractile H(1) receptors of the guinea-pig ileum and endothelium-denuded aorta, respectively, except 10 (histaprodifen; 2-[2-(3, 3-diphenylpropyl)-1H-imidazol-4-yl]ethanamine) which was a full agonist in the ileum assay. While 10 was equipotent with histamine (1), methylhistaprodifen (13) and dimethylhistaprodifen (14) exceeded the functional potency of 1 by a factor of 3-5 (13) and 2-3 (14). Compounds 10 and 13-17 relaxed precontracted rat aortic rings (intact endothelium) with relative potencies of 3.3- up to 28-fold (compared with 1), displaying partial agonism as well. Agonist effects were sensitive to blockade by the selective H(1)-receptor antagonist mepyramine (pA(2) approximately 9 (guinea-pig) and pA(2) approximately 8 (rat aorta)). The affinity of 10 and 13-17 for guinea-pig H(1) receptors increased 20- to 100-fold compared with 1. Two lower homologues of 10 were weak partial H(1)-receptor agonists while two higher homologues of 10 were silent antagonists endowed with micromolar affinity for rat and guinea-pig H(1) receptors. In functional selectivity experiments, 10, 13, and 14 did not stimulate H(2), H(3), and several other neurotransmitter receptors. They displayed only low to moderate affinity for these sites (pA(2) < 6). For a better understanding of structure-activity relationships, the interaction of 1 and 10, 13 and 14 within the transmembrane (TM) domains of the human histamine H(1) receptor were studied using molecular dynamics simulations. Remarkable differences were found between the binding modes of 10, 13, and 14 and that of 1. The imidazole ring of 10, 13, and 14 was placed 'upside down' compared with 1, making the interaction of the N(pi)-atom with Tyr431 possible. This new orientation was mainly caused by the space filling substitution at the 2-position of the imidazole ring and influenced the location of the protonated N(alpha)-atom which was positioned more between TM III and TM VI. This orientation can explain both the increased relative potency and the maximum effect of 10, 13, and 14 compared with 1. Compound 13 (methylhistaprodifen; N(alpha)-methyl-2-[2-(3, 3-diphenylpropyl)-1H-imidazol-4-yl]ethanamine) is the most potent histamine H(1)-receptor agonist reported so far in the literature and may become a valuable tool for the study of physiological and pathophysiological H(1)-receptor-mediated effects.

Structure-activity relationships of novel azomethine prodrugs of the histamine H3-receptor agonist (R)-alpha-methylhistamine: from alkylaryl to substituted diaryl derivatives.

This study was performed on the basis of recently developed prodrugs of the histamine H3-receptor agonist (R)-alpha-methylhistamine (1) to determine structure-activity relationships of azomethine prodrugs of 1, in which the primary amine functionality is bioreversibly linked to aromatic ketones. Therefore, the pro-moiety was systematically altered from alkylaryl over benzylaryl to diaryl substitution. Those compounds that emerged to be stable enough during preparation were tested for their in vitro hydrolysis rates. Apparently, bulky alkyl residues were capable of preventing previously observed intramolecular cyclization, but the obtained azomethines 12a-c were far too unstable to serve as prodrugs. However, the benzylaryl imines 12d, e were stable compounds, but 12d decomposed too rapidly under in vitro conditions. Distinctly greater stability was provided by diaryl pro-moieties, even if strongly electron-withdrawing functionalities were introduced. Selected compounds were also tested in vivo following p.o. application to mice. Particularly the trifluoromethyl substituted imine 12i proved to be highly effective as stability and rate of conversion were well-balanced, so that brain penetration of 1 was strikingly facilitated. Thus 12i, a highly potent azomethine prodrug, may serve as an important pharmacological tool and, possibly, a therapeutic agent.

New potent azomethine prodrugs of the histamine H3-receptor agonist (R)-alpha-methylhistamine containing a heteroarylphenyl partial structure.

The therapeutic value of histamine H3-receptor ligands is under current investigation. On the basis of recently described diary limine prodrugs of the histamine H3-receptor agonist (R)-alpha-methylhistamine (1) as a series of new azomethine prodrugs containing five- and six-membered heterocycles were synthesized and tested for their in vitro hydrolysis rates and in vivo activity after oral application. It was found that electron-deficient six-membered heterocycles drastically destabilized the imine double bond so that these prodrugs decomposed unsuitably fast. On the contrary, prodrugs containing five-membered heterocycles appeared to be highly effective for the CNS delivery of 1, and a remarkable correlation between chemical structure and pharmacokinetic profile was observed. Particularly (R)-4-fluoro-2-[[N-[1-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)-2-propyl]imino] (1H-pyrrol-2-yl)methyl]phenol (8c), the 2-furanyl analogue 8d, and its 3-furanyl isomer 8e proved to be equipotent to the most potent of recently described halogenated diaryl imine prodrugs of 1. However, in contrast to any other azomethine prodrug, 8c exhibited an incomparably long lasting delivery of 1 in the CNS and can thus be regarded as a 'retard' prodrug. Assuming that a therapeutic indication of histamine H3-receptor agonists will soon be established, these highly potent heteroarylphenyl azomethine prodrugs, which already serve as valuable pharmacological tools, may also become potential drugs in clinical use.

Synthesis, X-ray crystallography, and pharmacokinetics of novel azomethine prodrugs of (R)-alpha-methylhistamine: highly potent and selective histamine H3 receptor agonists.

Since various neuroregulatory functions of the histamine H3 receptor have been proved during the last few years, the H3 receptor is of current interest. Azomethine derivatives of the highly potent histamine H3 receptor agonist (R)-alpha-methylhistamine (1) were prepared as lipophilic prodrugs to improve the bioavailability of the hydrophilic drug, particularly its entry into the brain. Additionally, azomethine derivatization provides protection against histamine methyltransferase, the major metabolizing enzyme in man, and thus efficiently enhances the bioavailability of 1. The molecular conformations of (R)-2(-)[[N(-)[1-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)-2-propyl]- imino]phenylmethyl]phenol (9a) and (R)-4-fluoro-2(-)[[N(-)[1-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)-2-propyl[imino]- (4-chlorophenyl)methyl]phenol (9p) were determined by X-ray structure analysis. An intramolecular hydrogen bond which is essential for the stability of these azomethines was thereby confirmed. Moreover, the pharmacokinetic parameters of the prodrugs were investigated in vitro as well as in vivo. The halogenated azomethines have an effect following peroral administration in mice, and some of them seem to be highly potent for the central nervous system (CNS) delivery of 1. At present the most potent prodrug of 1 is (R)-4-chloro-2(-)[[N(-)[1-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)-2-propyl]imino](4- chlorophenyl)methyl]phenol (9q), reaching by far the highest CNS level of 1 (Cmax = 71 ng/g). Prodrugs of this type are not only valuable pharmacological tools but may also become H3 histaminergic drugs for therapeutic use.

Studies on activation of H3 histamine receptor: a mechanistic model.

The recognition and the activation mechanism of the H3 histamine receptor was studied based on quantum-chemical calculations. A mechanistic model proposed both for recognition and activation stage clarifies different properties of histamine and alpha-methylhistamine at the H3 receptor. Interaction with a hypothetical receptor sites leads to the opening of the intramolecular hydrogen bonding in histamine, whereas the alpha-methylhistamine remains in closed conformation.

Theoretical studies on molecular determinants for recognition at H3 histamine receptors.

The determinants for recognition at H3 histamine receptors are considered. Findings based on quantum-chemical calculations suggest that H3 histamine receptor is less hydrophilic than the H2. The form most likely to be recognized by the H3 receptor is an intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded form of alpha-methylhistamine. Receptor environment and hydration effects of active form of histamine analogs are of crucial importance.

Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay to measure urinary N tau-methylhistamine excretion in man.

An assay has been developed for N tau-methylhistamine, a major metabolite of the autocoid histamine, based on gas chromatography-electron-capture negative-ion chemical ionisation mass spectrometry. N tau-Methylhistamine was extracted from urine by cation-exchange chromatography and converted to its di-(3,5-bistrifluoromethylbenzoyl) derivative. The latter has good chromatographic properties and gives a negative-ion mass spectrum with the molecular ion (M., m/z 605) as base peak. A commercially available trideuterated analogue of N tau-methylhistamine was used as internal standard. Basal urinary excretion of N tau-methylhistamine in five normal subjects was found to be 0.21 +/- 0.05 mumol/h (289 +/- 74 mumol/mol of creatinine). This value was not significantly altered in these subjects following the infusion of a subpharmacological dose of histamine. In eight atopic volunteers, basal urinary excretion of N tau-methylhistamine was also not significantly changed following challenge with inhaled allergen.

Novel chiral H3-receptor agonists.

Several alkyl-substituted histamine derivatives have been synthesized and investigated for their agonistic potency on three classes of histamine receptors. While all investigated compounds are full agonists at H3-receptors their relative potency vs. histamine is strongly varying and culminates in alpha R, beta S-dimethylhistamine which is a highly potent and selective H3-receptor agonist.