Differences between pathologic and non-pathologic high myopia in 4-year outcomes of anti-VEGF therapy for macular neovascularization.

This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the difference in 4-year outcomes of ranibizumab or aflibercept therapy for macular neovascularization (MNV) with high myopia between pathologic myopia (PM) and non-PM. This study was conducted at Kyoto University Hospital and included consecutive treatment-naïve eyes with active myopic MNV, in which a single intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept injection was administered, followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen for 4 years. Based on the META-PM study classification, eyes were assigned to the non-PM and PM groups. This study analyzed 118 eyes of 118 patients (non-PM group, 19 eyes; PM group, 99 eyes). Baseline, 1-year, and 2-year best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were significantly better in the non-PM group (P = 0.02, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively); however, the 3-year and 4-year BCVA were not. The 4-year BCVA course was similar in both groups. However, the total number of injections over 4 years was significantly higher in the non-PM than in the PM group (4.6 ± 2.6 vs. 2.9 ± 2.6, P = 0.001). Four-year BCVA significantly correlated only with baseline BCVA in both non-PM (P = 0.047, ß = 0.46) and PM groups (P < 0.001, ß = 0.59). In conclusion, over the 4-year observation period, the BCVA course after anti-VEGF therapy for myopic MNV was similar in the eyes with non-PM and those with PM; however, more additional injections in a PRN regimen were required in the eyes with non-PM compared to those with PM. Thus, more frequent and careful follow-up is required for the eyes with non-PM compared with those with PM to maintain long-term BCVA.

'Structural OCT changes distinguishing between myopic macular haemorrhages due to choroidal neovascularization and spontaneous Bruch's membrane rupture: the "myopic 2 binary reflective sign".

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) in comparison to fluorescein angiography (FA) and OCT angiography (OCTA) in discerning between macular haemorrhages (MH) due to myopic choroidal neovascularization (m-CNV) and idiopathic macular haemorrhage (IMH) in myopic patients and to suggest a new OCT biomarker to discern these two entities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this longitudinal retrospective study, patients affected by MH and pathological myopia were included. All patients underwent OCTA and FA to discern bleeding from m-CNV or IMH. Furthermore, all patients underwent a structural OCT and 2 expert graders evaluated the presence of the myopic 2 binary reflective sign as a biomarker to discern between IMH and bleeding from m-CNV. RESULTS: Forty-seven eyes of 47 patients were enrolled. By means of angiographic examinations, 34 out of 47 eyes with MH (57%) were diagnosed as m-CNV, whereas 13 eyes (43%) as IMH. Using structural OCT, the graders identified the presence of the myopic 2 binary reflective sign in 13 out of 13 eyes with IMH. In 33 out of 34 cases with m-CNV, the 2 graders established the absence of the sign. This accounted for 100% of sensibility and 97% of specificity of structural OCT in discerning between MH from m-CNV and IMH. CONCLUSION: Structural OCT can discern with good reliability between IMH and bleeding from m-CNV based on the presence/ absence of the myopic 2 binary reflective sign. This could be of paramount relevance in the clinical setting for the diagnosis and treatment of HM patients.

Topical Atropine for Childhood Myopia Control: The Atropine Treatment Long-Term Assessment Study.

Importance: Clinical trial results of topical atropine eye drops for childhood myopia control have shown inconsistent outcomes across short-term studies, with little long-term safety or other outcomes reported. Objective: To report the long-term safety and outcomes of topical atropine for childhood myopia control. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, double-masked observational study of the Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia (ATOM) 1 and ATOM2 randomized clinical trials took place at 2 single centers and included adults reviewed in 2021 through 2022 from the ATOM1 study (atropine 1% vs placebo; 1999 through 2003) and the ATOM2 study (atropine 0.01% vs 0.1% vs 0.5%; 2006 through 2012). Main Outcome Measures: Change in cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) with axial length (AL); incidence of ocular complications. Results: Among the original 400 participants in each original cohort, the study team evaluated 71 of 400 ATOM1 adult participants (17.8% of original cohort; study age, mean [SD] 30.5 [1.2] years; 40.6% female) and 158 of 400 ATOM2 adult participants (39.5% of original cohort; study age, mean [SD], 24.5 [1.5] years; 42.9% female) whose baseline characteristics (SE and AL) were representative of the original cohort. In this study, evaluating ATOM1 participants, the mean (SD) SE and AL were -5.20 (2.46) diopters (D), 25.87 (1.23) mm and -6.00 (1.63) D, 25.90 (1.21) mm in the 1% atropine-treated and placebo groups, respectively (difference of SE, 0.80 D; 95% CI, -0.25 to 1.85 D; P = .13; difference of AL, -0.03 mm; 95% CI, -0.65 to 0.58 mm; P = .92). In ATOM2 participants, the mean (SD) SE and AL was -6.40 (2.21) D; 26.25 (1.34) mm; -6.81 (1.92) D, 26.28 (0.99) mm; and -7.19 (2.87) D, 26.31 (1.31) mm in the 0.01%, 0.1%, and 0.5% atropine groups, respectively. There was no difference in the 20-year incidence of cataract/lens opacities, myopic macular degeneration, or parapapillary atrophy (ß/γ zone) comparing the 1% atropine-treated group vs the placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among approximately one-quarter of the original participants, use of short-term topical atropine eye drops ranging from 0.01% to 1.0% for a duration of 2 to 4 years during childhood was not associated with differences in final refractive errors 10 to 20 years after treatment. There was no increased incidence of treatment or myopia-related ocular complications in the 1% atropine-treated group vs the placebo group. These findings may affect the design of future clinical trials, as further studies are required to investigate the duration and concentration of atropine for childhood myopia control.

Efficacy and safety of different conbercept injection regimens in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization in pathological myopia: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical efficacy of conbercept 1 + pro re nata (PRN) (i.e., reinjection as needed after one injection) and 3 + PRN (reinjection as needed after 3 months of injection) regimens in choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia (PM-CNV). METHODS: From 06/2019 to 06/2020, 65 patients (65 eyes) confirmed with PM-CNV were included in this retrospective study. Intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg conbercept was conducted either with the 1 + PRN or 3 + PRN strategy. Patients were followed up for 12 months. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), CNV lesion leakage area, the number of injections, and postoperative adverse reactions were observed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 42.10 ± 4.69 years, and the average diopter was - 11.26 ± 2.97D. The BCVA at month 3 in the 3 + PRN (n = 30) group was lower than in the 1 + PRN (n = 35) group (P < 0.001). The CRT at month 3 in the 3 + PRN group was lower than in the 1 + PRN group (P < 0.001). After 12 months, there were no differences in the BCVA and CRT between the two groups (P > 0.05). The number of injections was less in 1 + PRN than in 3 + PRN (2.14 ± 1.06 vs. 3.37 ± 0.76, P < 0.001) at 12 months. No serious treatment-related ocular complications or serious systemic adverse events were found. CONCLUSION: The 1 + PRN and 3 + PRN strategies of intravitreal injection of conbercept are effective in treating PM-CNV. The 1 + PRN regimen required fewer injections, and it might be more suitable for the treatment of PM-CNV.

Comparison of anatomical and functional outcomes of treating myopic choroidal neovascularization with bevacizumab or ranibizumab.

PURPOSE: To compare results of treatment with bevacizumab and ranibizumab injections in myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV). METHODS: Retrospective, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: patients with mCNV treated with bevacizumab or ranibizumab injections. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were collected at baseline, after 3, 6, 12, 24 months and the last visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: mean change in BCVA and CRT. RESULTS: We included 85 eyes treated with bevacizumab and 125 eyes treated with ranibizumab. There was no difference between the groups regarding BCVA and CRT change. CNV recurrence occurred at the mean time of 66.1 ± 3.7 and 57.3 ± 6.4 months in the bevacizumab- and ranibizumab-treated eyes, respectively (p = 0.006). During the first year 6.9% eyes in the bevacizumab group vs. 27.5% in the ranibizumab group had CNV recurrence (p = 0.001). Risk factors for recurrence of CNV were baseline CNV area (aHR 1.20, 95%CI 1.0-1.32, p = 0.04), subfoveal CNV (aHR 2.13, 95% CI 1.16-3.93, p = 0.01) and ranibizumab treatment (aHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.16-3.93, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Eyes treated with bevacizumab and ranibizumab can achieve similar anatomical and functional improvement. CNV recurrence may occur earlier and more frequently during the first year in eyes treated with ranibizumab.

Optical coherence tomography biomarkers for myopic choroidal neovascularization treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor.

In recent years, optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers for specific retinal diseases have been found to be associated with treatment outcome and disease recurrence. The main purposes of this study were to identify OCT biomarkers for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) treated with intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). OCT features in 43 eyes of 39 patients with mCNV treated with anti-VEGF with at least 1 year of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Eyes with subretinal hyperreflective material (SHM) in baseline spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) had significantly more visual improvement than eyes without SHM at month 6 (p = 0.007) and had a trend of more visual improvement than eyes without SHM (p = 0.058) at month 12. Eyes with subretinal fluid (SRF) at baseline had significantly more central retinal thickness (CRT) decrease than patients without SRF at month 6 and 12 (p = 0.012 and 0.006 respectively). In univariate regression analysis, dome-shaped macula (DSM), SRF in baseline OCT image and fuzzy border of mCNV when entering pro re nata (PRN) injection protocol tended to have higher risk of disease recurrence in 1 year (odds ratio: 14.86 (p = 0.003), 3.75 (p = 0.049) and 22.92 (p < 0.001) respectively). However, they were not significant in multivariate regression analysis. OCT biomarkers at baseline could provide prognostic information for mCNV management.

Risk factors for myopic choroidal neovascularization-related macular atrophy after anti-VEGF treatment.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate risk factors for macular atrophy (MA) associated with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) during long-term follow-up after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in highly myopic eyes. METHODS: The medical records of patients who received intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents as mCNV treatment and were followed-up for more than 36 months were retrospectively reviewed. The risk factors for the development of mCNV-MA, which is the fovea-involving patchy atrophy lesion adjacent to mCNV, were investigated using the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: A total of 82 eyes (74 patients) were included in the study. The mean age at anti-VEGF treatment was 56.3 ± 12.5 years (range, 26-77), and the mean follow-up period was 76.3 ± 33.5 months (range, 36-154). During follow-up, mCNV-MA developed in 27 eyes (32.9%), and its occurrence was estimated to be 24.5% at 3 years and 37.3% at 5 years after the first anti-VEGF treatment. Old age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.054, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.018-1.091; P = 0.003) and greater CNV size at baseline (HR = 2.396, CI: 1.043-5.504; P = 0.040) were significant factors for mCNV-MA development. Eyes with a thinner subfoveal choroid were more likely to show faster enlargement of the mCNV-MA during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In mCNV eyes treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, older age and greater mCNV size at baseline were risk factors for the development of MA during long-term follow-up, which was associated with a poor visual prognosis.

Morphological parameters of myopic choroidal neovascularization as predictive factors of anti-VEGF treatment response.

The objective of this prospective study was to investigate the morphological changes of myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) after treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and to identify potential features predictive of the final BCVA. OCT and OCTA features were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 6 and 12 months. Parameters investigated were the maturity pattern, presence of mCNV OCT activity signs, subretinal fibrosis and mCNV area. Forty patients (41 eyes) were included in the study. At the final visit, after a mean of 3.1 ± 1.4 injections, BCVA had improved significantly (p = 0.009) and subretinal hyperreflective exudation, subretinal fluid and intraretinal cysts nearly disappeared at 12 months. At baseline, 20 eyes had an immature CNV that were smaller, required less injections (2.5 ± 1.2 vs 3.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.002), they completely regressed in seven eyes and achieved a better BCVA (0.14 ± 0.15 vs 0.40 ± 0.26 logMAR, p < 0.001) when compared to mature CNV. Subretinal fibrosis developed in 19 eyes (46.3%) with lower final BCVA than eyes without fibrosis (0.19 ± 0.24 vs 0.38 ± 0.22 logMAR, p = 0.012). Baseline immature pattern (p = 0.005) and baseline BCVA (p < 0.001) were predictive of final BCVA. Multimodal imaging is useful to define mCNV changes during treatment. OCTA provides prognostic information which cannot achieved by other imaging techniques.

Efficacy of 0.01% low dose atropine and its correlation with various factors in myopia control in the Indian population.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose atropine compared to placebo in the Indian population and also to study the impact of various modifiable and non-modifiable factors on myopia progression (MP) and drug efficacy (DE). It was a single-centre prospective placebo-controlled interventional study. 43 participants aged 6-16 years with progressive myopia received 0.01% atropine in the right eyes (treatment) and placebo in the left eyes (control) for 1-year. The main outcome measures were annual MP and axial length elongation (ALE) in treatment and control eyes and their percentage difference between two eyes (drug efficacy). Secondary outcome measures were the occurrence of any adverse events and the correlation of MP, ALE, and DE with various factors. 40 participants (80 eyes) completed the follow-up. After 1-year, MP was 0.25 D (IQR 0.13-0.44) and 0.69 D (IQR 0.50-1.0) (p < 0.001) in treatment and control respectively (63.89% reduction) with respective ALE of 0.14 mm (IQR 0.05-0.35) and 0.32 mm (IQR 0.19-0.46) (p < 0.001) (44.44% reduction). No adverse events were noted. Reduction in MP and ALE was statistically significant in all children irrespective of age-group, baseline MP, family history, screen-time, near and outdoor-time. The strongest determinants of annual MP were age (Treatment: r = - 0.418, p = 0.007; Control: r = - 0.452, p = 0.003) and baseline MP (Treatment: r = 0.64, p = 0.000; Control: r = 0.79, p = 0.000). Screen-time in control eyes was associated with greater ALE (r = 0.620, p = 0.042). DE was higher when outdoor time exceeded 2 h/day (p = 0.035) while the efficacy was lower with prolonged near activities (p = 0.03), baseline fast-progressors (p < 0.05) and history of parental myopia (p < 0.05). 0.01% atropine is effective and safe in retarding MP and ALE in Indian eyes.

PREDICTING LESION SHRINKAGE IN EYES WITH MYOPIC CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION FROM FEATURES ON OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY.

PURPOSE: To identify baseline morphological predictors of lesion shrinkage in eyes with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. METHODS: This retrospective study included 46 eyes (41 consecutive patients) with active mCNV receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment. Optical coherence tomography angiography was performed at baseline and 1 year after treatment. Quantitative features were obtained from optical coherence tomography angiography images using AngioTool software. Eyes were classified as "high shrinkage" or "low shrinkage" according to the median relative change in lesion area. Baseline quantitative morphological features associated with mCNV shrinkage were identified in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The mCNV area was significantly smaller after 1 year ( P = 0.013), with a median relative change of -16.5%. The relative change in mCNV area was -48.3% in high-shrinkage eyes (n = 23) and -5.2% in low-shrinkage eyes (n = 23). High-shrinkage eyes had a smaller mCNV area ( P = 0.013), shorter total vessel length ( P = 0.023), and higher end point density ( P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed significant associations of high shrinkage with end point density (ß = -0.037, P = 0.043) and previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment (ß = 0.216, P = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Morphological features of neovascularization detected by optical coherence tomography angiography can predict lesion shrinkage in eyes with mCNV receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Higher end point density contributed to shrinkage, particularly of treatment-naive lesions.

A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for myopic macular degeneration.

Background: Myopic macular degeneration (MMD) is a primary cause of blindness and visual impairment in many parts of the world. A review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for intervention selection are required with the increasing demand for MMD management in clinical practice as well as in national health services. Therefore, we aim to systematically review CPGs for MMD and assist the recommendations development of the Package of Eye Care Interventions (PECI) program of the World Health Organization. Methods: A systematic review of CPGs published on MMD between 2010 and April 2020 was conducted. Guidelines were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. Cochrane systematic reviews were also included when the evidence from included CPGs were inadequate or contradict. Results: After applying exclusion criteria and conducting the quality appraisal, two CPGs were finally included. The average of the AGREE II ratings for the identified Guidelines were 56 and 63 respectively (7 for each item). To provide further information on interventions for MMD, one Cochrane review on MMD was additionally identified and included in the study. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs were recommended for patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) as first-line therapy to improve vision and reduce central macular thickness, and ranibizumab showed significant effectiveness compared to photodynamic therapy (PDT). PDT was recommended to be performed in those resistant to the treatment by one CPG but lacked of adequate description and support. Data extracted from the Cochrane systematic reviews indicated that anti-VEGF therapy for mCNV had significant effectiveness in improving visual acuity and reducing CMT compared to PDT with moderate to low certainty of evidence. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab were considered as equally effective with moderate certainty. Conclusions: The outcomes of this review suggest that high quality clinical practice guidelines for MMD management are limited. Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents was recommended as an effective intervention to treat myopic CNV as the first-line treatment, while there was inadequate guidance for the application of PDT in myopic CNV management. The use of other interventions for MMD were not recommended at this time and additional evidence is called for.

Three-year OCT predictive factors of disease recurrence in eyes with successfully treated myopic choroidal neovascularisation.

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship of demographics, clinical characteristics and structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings to disease recurrence in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed myopic choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) METHODS: In this retrospective, longitudinal study, a total of 64 participants (64 eyes) with successfully treated myopic CNV had obtained resolution of exudation after treatment (study baseline) and with 3 years of regular follow-ups. Several baseline OCT qualitative features and quantitative measurements were assessed at baseline and included in the analysis. Main outcome measures included incidence of disease recurrence and HR for demographics, clinical characteristics and OCT risk factors. RESULTS: At month 36, 40 eyes (62.5%) developed disease recurrence (active CNV). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that final visual acuity (dependent variable) was associated with visual acuity at the first visit after complete resolution of exudation (p<0.0001), baseline size of patchy atrophy (p=0.010), baseline subfoveal choroidal thickness (p=0.008), baseline maximum CNV height and width (p=0.011 and p=0.003) and recurrence of CNV exudation (p=0.007). The following factors were associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence: size of patchy atrophy had an HR of 1.14 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.29; p=0.036); maximum CNV width had an HR of 1.02 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.04; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: We identified OCT risk factors for the disease recurrence in eyes with successfully treated myopic CNV. Assuming that disease recurrence is a sight-threatening event, our findings may help in the identification of high-risk patients and eventually ameliorate their outcome.

Safety review of anti-VEGF therapy in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-angiogenesis therapy with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents is now the standard-of-care treatment for myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV). AREAS COVERED: We provide a critical review of the safety of all the anti-VEGF agents currently used for treating myopic CNV including ranibizumab, aflibercept, conbercept, bevacizumab, and ziv-aflibercept. EXPERT OPINION: Anti-VEGF therapy for myopic CNV with the currently available anti-VEGF drugs generally have favorable safety outcomes in the short-term. Nonetheless, ocular adverse events following anti-VEGF therapy for myopic CNV may develop and these include worsening or new development of myopic traction maculopathy, increased risk of retinal detachment, and progression of chorioretinal atrophy. Clinicians should be aware of these potential complications and evaluate them before and after anti-VEGF therapy.

Three-Year Clinical Trial of Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study: Continued Versus Washout: Phase 3 Report.

PURPOSE: (1) To compare the efficacy of continued and stopping treatment for 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine during the third year. (2) To evaluate the efficacy of continued treatment over 3 years. (3) To investigate the rebound phenomenon and its determinants after cessation of treatment. DESIGN: A randomized, double-masked extended trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 350 of 438 children aged 4 to 12 years originally recruited into the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) study. METHODS: At the beginning of the third year, children in each group were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to continued treatment and washout subgroups. Cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) refraction and axial length (AL) were measured at 4-month intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in SE and AL between groups. RESULTS: A total of 326 children completed 3 years of follow-up. During the third year, SE progression and AL elongation were faster in the washout subgroups than in the continued treatment groups across all concentrations: -0.68 ± 0.49 diopters (D) versus -0.28 ± 0.42 D (P < 0.001) and 0.33 ± 0.17 mm versus 0.17 ± 0.14 mm (P < 0.001) for the 0.05%; -0.57 ± 0.38 D versus -0.35 ± 0.37 D (P = 0.004) and 0.29 ± 0.14 mm versus 0.20 ± 0.15 mm (P = 0.001) for the 0.025%; -0.56 ± 0.40 D versus -0.38 ± 0.49 D (P = 0.04) and 0.29 ± 0.15 mm versus 0.24 ± 0.18 mm (P = 0.13) for the 0.01%. Over the 3-year period, SE progressions were -0.73 ± 1.04 D, -1.31 ± 0.92 D, and -1.60 ± 1.32 D (P = 0.001) for the 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% groups in the continued treatment subgroups, respectively, and -1.15 ± 1.13 D, -1.47 ± 0.77 D, and -1.81 ± 1.10 D (P = 0.03), respectively, in the washout subgroup. The respective AL elongations were 0.50 ± 0.40 mm, 0.74 ± 0.41 mm, and 0.89 ± 0.53 mm (P < 0.001) for the continued treatment subgroups and 0.70 ± 0.47 mm, 0.82 ± 0.37 mm, and 0.98 ± 0.48 mm (P = 0.04) for the washout subgroup. The rebound SE progressions during washout were concentration dependent, but their differences were clinically small (P = 0.15). Older age and lower concentration were associated with smaller rebound effects in both SE progression (P < 0.001) and AL elongation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During the third year, continued atropine treatment achieved a better effect across all concentrations compared with the washout regimen. 0.05% atropine remained the optimal concentration over 3 years in Chinese children. The differences in rebound effects were clinically small across all 3 studied atropine concentrations. Stopping treatment at an older age and lower concentration are associated with a smaller rebound.

Safety and efficacy of 0.02% and 0.01% atropine on controlling myopia progression: a 2-year clinical trial.

Four hundred myopic children randomly received atropine 0.02% (n = 138) or 0.01% (n = 142) in both eyes once-nightly or only wore single-vision spectacles (control group) (n = 120) for 2 years. Spherical equivalent refractive error (SER), axial length (AL), pupil diameter (PD), and amplitude of accommodation (AMP) were measured every 4 months. After 2 years, the SER changes were - 0.80 (0.52) D, - 0.93 (0.59) D and - 1.33 (0.72) D and the AL changes were 0.62 (0.29) mm, 0.72 (0.31) mm and 0.88 (0.35) mm in the 0.02% and 0.01% atropine groups and control group, respectively. There were significant differences between changes in SER and AL in the three groups (all P < 0.001). The changes in SER and AL in the 2nd year were similar to the changes in the 1st year in the three groups (all P > 0.05). From baseline to 2 years, the overall decrease in AMP and increase in PD were not significantly different in the two atropine groups, whereas the AMP and PD in the control group remained stable (all P > 0.05). 0.02% atropine had a better effect on myopia control than 0.01% atropine, and its effects on PD and AMP were similar to 0.01% atropine. 0.02% or 0.01% atropine controlled myopia progression and AL elongation synchronously and had similar effects on myopia control each year.

Result of intravitreal aflibercept injection for myopic choroidal neovascularization.

BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept injections as the primary treatment for subfoveal/juxtafoveal myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) by using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) was further used for some patients to detect the changes of CNV after treatment. METHODS: In the present study, 21 treatment-naive eyes of 21 patients with subfoveal/juxtafoveal myopic CNV received primary intravitreal aflibercept injections and were under follow-up for a minimum duration of 12 months. Among the 21 patients, 12 underwent OCTA to evaluate the changes in central foveal thickness, selected CNV area, and flow area. RESULTS: The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) pertaining to all the patients significantly improved from the baseline value of 0.7 to 0.3 logMAR after treatment for 12 months (P = 0.001). However, the improvements in the median BCVA after treatment for three and 12 months were not statistically significant in the younger group (< 50 years), compared to the older group (≥ 50 years). One aflibercept injection resolved the CNV in 47.6% (10/21) of the patients. The younger group displayed greater improvement in the median central foveal thickness, compared to the older group. OCTA revealed interlacing or disorganized pattern at the level of the outer retinal layer in 12 subjects with myopic CNV. After 3 months of treatment, both groups displayed a decrease in the size of the selected CNV area and flow area. The interlacing group displayed a trend towards better anatomical improvements. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal aflibercept injection provides long-term improvement in visual acuity in patients with myopic CNV. Eyes with the interlacing pattern on OCTA displayed a greater decrease in size and flow after aflibercept injection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Before data collection, written informed consent was obtained from each participant, whose identity information was protected by encryption and conversion to a non-identifiable format and removing data links. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital ( KSVGH21-CT1-17 ).

Using optical coherence tomography angiography to guide myopic choroidal neovascularization treatment: a 3-year follow-up study.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term changes of the size of myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational case study of eleven eyes in eleven patients with mCNV followed with OCTA for a minimum of 3 years. The flow area of mCNV on OCTA, the size of chorioretinal atrophy (CRA) and central choroidal thickness were analyzed. The relationship between the changes of mCNV size and recurrences treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents was also assessed. RESULTS: Three eyes out of eleven eyes showed enlargement of the mCNV over 3 years. In two of the three eyes, the mCNV recurrences had not been treated immediately (the examination intervals were 4 months and 5 months, respectively), and we found obvious enlargement of the mCNV. In three eyes, the mCNV size decreased in 1 year and was stable thereafter without recurrences. In five eyes, mCNV size did not show remarkable changes for 3 years. In three of the five eyes, no recurrences were detected and two of the five eyes underwent prompt treatments against recurrences. CONCLUSION: Regular examination and prompt treatments against recurrences are critical to prevent enlargement of mCNV.

Choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia-macular Bruch membrane defects as prognostic factor to anti-VEGF treatment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence and visual outcomes of macular Bruch membrane (BM) defects in patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) for choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia (mCNV). METHODS: Single-center retrospective observational case series of 68 eyes from 62 patients with mCNV treated with one anti-VEGF injection followed by a pro re nata (1 + PRN) regimen. A minimum follow-up of 6 months was defined. Chorioretinal atrophy was assessed by fundus examination, fluorescein angiography, and SD-OCT. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 28.5 (range 6-89) months with a median number of 5 anti-VEGF injections. At baseline, 27.9% of eyes had macular BM defects increasing to 36.8% during follow-up (p<0.001). Eyes without macular BM defects at the baseline had higher BCVA at the last observation than patients with BM defects (p=0.003). An increase of 5 or more ETDRS letters was more frequent in eyes without BM defects (p=0.001). At the end of follow-up, mCNV-related macular atrophy was present in 44.1%; out of which, 83.3% presented macular BM defects (p<0.001). Eyes with mCNV-related macular atrophy without BM defects had a significant increase of best-corrected visual acuity compared with eyes with mCNV-related macular atrophy and BM defect (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Macular Bruch membrane defects are often seen in mCNV and have a significant impact in visual acuity and prognosis. Eyes with macular BM defects have a poorer response and worse visual outcomes after anti-VEGF therapy.

Intravitreal conbercept for choroidal neovascularisation secondary to pathological myopia in a real-world setting in China : Intravitreal conbercept was safe and effective in treating myopic choroidal neovascularization.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the 12-month efficacy and safety of intravitreal conbercept for myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV). METHODS: A retrospective, observational study. Thirty-four eyes of 34 pathologic myopic patients with CNV were treated with intravitreal conbercept (IVC) 0.5 mg with a follow up of 12 months. After the first injection, administration of conbercept followed a pro re nata (PRN) regimen. Outcomes included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), CNV size, the total number of treatments, and adverse events. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 55.88 ± 16.17 years, and the mean eye spherical equivalent was - 8.72 ± 3.75 D. The mean number of IVC over 12 months was 2.12 ± 0.69. Overall, best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA)improved from 0.86 ± 0.33 logMAR at baseline to 0.44 ± 0.32 logMAR at month 12 (p < 0.001), mean improvement of vision was 4.12 ± 2.69 lines. Mean central retinal thickness reduced from 285.9 ± 104.6 µm at baseline to 192.1 ± 97.5 µm at month 12 (p < 0.001). Mean CNV size decreased from 0.52 ± 0.38 mm2 at baseline to 0.31 ± 0.19 mm2 at 12 months (p < 0.05). All the 34 eyes had reduced or stable size of CNV. Thirty-two eyes (94.12 %) showed the absence of CNV leakage at the end of the study period. No severe systemic or ocular adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal conbercept 0.5 mg was safe and effective for treatment of myopic CNV over 12 months in a real-world setting.

Age Effect on Treatment Responses to 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% Atropine: Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of age at treatment and other factors on treatment response to atropine in the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study. DESIGN: Secondary analysis from a randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fifty children aged 4 to 12 years who originally were assigned to receive 0.05%, 0.025%, or 0.01% atropine or placebo once daily, and who completed 2 years of the LAMP Study, were included. In the second year, the placebo group was switched to the 0.05% atropine group. METHODS: Potential predictive factors for change in spherical equivalent (SE) and axial length (AL) over 2 years were evaluated by generalized estimating equations in each treatment group. Evaluated factors included age at treatment, gender, baseline refraction, parental myopia, time outdoors, diopter hours of near work, and treatment compliance. Estimated mean values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of change in SE and AL over 2 years also were generated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors associated with SE change and AL change over 2 years were the primary outcome measures. Associated factors during the first year were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: In 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine groups, younger age was the only factor associated with SE progression (coefficient of 0.14, 0.15, and 0.20, respectively) and AL elongation (coefficient of -0.10, -0.11, and -0.12, respectively) over 2 years; the younger the age, the poorer the response. At each year of age from 4 to 12 years across the treatment groups, higher-concentration atropine showed a better treatment response, following a concentration-dependent effect (Ptrend <0.05 for each age group). In addition, the mean SE progression in 6-year-old children receiving 0.05% atropine (-0.90 diopter [D]; 95% CI, -0.99 to -0.82) was similar to that of 8-year-old children receiving 0.025% atropine (-0.89 D; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.83) and 10-year-old children receiving 0.01% atropine (-0.92 D; 95% CI, -0.99 to -0.85). All concentrations were well tolerated in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age is associated with poor treatment response to low-concentration atropine at 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01%. Among concentrations studied, younger children required the highest 0.05% concentration to achieve similar reduction in myopic progression as older children receiving lower concentrations.