RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Wearable activity trackers have become key players in mobile health practice as they offer various behavior change techniques (BCTs) to help improve physical activity (PA). Typically, multiple BCTs are implemented simultaneously in a device, making it difficult to identify which BCTs specifically improve PA. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effects of BCTs implemented on a smartwatch, the Fitbit, to determine how each technique promoted PA. METHODS: This study was a single-blind, pilot randomized controlled trial, in which 70 adults (n=44, 63% women; mean age 40.5, SD 12.56 years; closed user group) were allocated to 1 of 3 BCT conditions: self-monitoring (feedback on participants' own steps), goal setting (providing daily step goals), and social comparison (displaying daily steps achieved by peers). Each intervention lasted for 4 weeks (fully automated), during which participants wore a Fitbit and responded to day-to-day questionnaires regarding motivation. At pre- and postintervention time points (in-person sessions), levels and readiness for PA as well as different aspects of motivation were assessed. RESULTS: Participants showed excellent adherence (mean valid-wear time of Fitbit=26.43/28 days, 94%), and no dropout was recorded. No significant changes were found in self-reported total PA (dz<0.28, P=.40 for the self-monitoring group, P=.58 for the goal setting group, and P=.19 for the social comparison group). Fitbit-assessed step count during the intervention period was slightly higher in the goal setting and social comparison groups than in the self-monitoring group, although the effects did not reach statistical significance (P=.052 and P=.06). However, more than half (27/46, 59%) of the participants in the precontemplation stage reported progress to a higher stage across the 3 conditions. Additionally, significant increases were detected for several aspects of motivation (ie, integrated and external regulation), and significant group differences were identified for the day-to-day changes in external regulation; that is, the self-monitoring group showed a significantly larger increase in the sense of pressure and tension (as part of external regulation) than the goal setting group (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Fitbit-implemented BCTs promote readiness and motivation for PA, although their effects on PA levels are marginal. The BCT-specific effects were unclear, but preliminary evidence showed that self-monitoring alone may be perceived demanding. Combining self-monitoring with another BCT (or goal setting, at least) may be important for enhancing continuous engagement in PA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework; https://osf.io/87qnb/?view_only=f7b72d48bb5044eca4b8ce729f6b403b.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Adulto , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Simple Ciego , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Monitores de Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/normas , MotivaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is not known whether an intervention made mandatory as a physical education (PE) class assignment and aimed at promoting physical activity (PA) in adolescents can create a healthy walking habit, which would allow further improvements to be achieved after the mandatory and promoted intervention has been completed. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to (1) investigate whether, after a period of using a step tracker mobile app made mandatory and promoted as a PE class assignment, adolescents continue to use it when its use is no longer mandatory and promoted; (2) determine whether there are changes in the PA level, body composition, and fitness of adolescents when the use of the app is mandatory and promoted and when it is neither mandatory nor promoted; and (3) analyze whether the covariates maturity status, gender, and specific app used can have an influence. METHODS: A total of 357 students in compulsory secondary education (age: mean 13.92, SD 1.91 y) participated in the study. A randomized controlled trial was conducted consisting of 2 consecutive 10-week interventions. Participants' PA level, body composition, and fitness were measured at baseline (T1), after 10 weeks of mandatory and promoted app use (T2), and after 10 weeks of nonmandatory and nonpromoted app use (T3). Each participant in the experimental group (EG) used 1 of 4 selected step tracker mobile apps after school hours. RESULTS: The results showed that when the use of the apps was neither mandatory nor promoted as a PE class assignment, only a few adolescents (18/216, 8.3%) continued the walking practice. After the mandatory and promoted intervention period (T1 vs T2), a decrease in the sum of 3 skinfolds (mean difference [MD] 1.679; P=.02) as well as improvements in the PA level (MD -0.170; P<.001), maximal oxygen uptake (MD -1.006; P<.001), countermovement jump test (MD -1.337; P=.04), curl-up test (MD -3.791; P<.001), and push-up test (MD -1.920; P<.001) in the EG were recorded. However, the changes between T1 and T2 were significantly greater in the EG than in the control group only in the PA level and curl-up test. Thus, when comparing the measurements taken between T1 and T3, no significant changes in body composition (P=.07) or fitness (P=.84) were observed between the EG and the control group. The covariates maturity status, gender, and specific app used showed a significant effect in most of the analyses performed. CONCLUSIONS: A period of mandatory and promoted use of step tracker mobile apps benefited the variables of body composition and fitness in adolescents but did not create a healthy walking habit in this population; therefore, when the use of these apps ceased to be mandatory and promoted, the effects obtained disappeared. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06164041; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06164041.
Asunto(s)
Composición Corporal , Ejercicio Físico , Aplicaciones Móviles , Aptitud Física , Humanos , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Aplicaciones Móviles/normas , Aplicaciones Móviles/estadística & datos numéricos , Composición Corporal/fisiología , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Aptitud Física/fisiología , Aptitud Física/psicología , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Monitores de Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/normas , Promoción de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Importance: Wearable physical activity (PA) trackers, such as accelerometers, fitness trackers, and pedometers, are accessible technologies that may encourage increased PA levels in line with current recommendations. However, whether their use is associated with improvements in PA levels in participants who experience 1 or more cardiometabolic conditions, such as diabetes, prediabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease, is unknown. Objective: To assess the association of interventions using wearable PA trackers (accelerometers, fitness trackers, and pedometers) with PA levels and other health outcomes in adults with cardiometabolic conditions. Data Sources: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO were performed from January 1, 2000, until December 31, 2020, with no language restriction. A combination of Medical Subject Heading terms and text words of diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, pedometers, accelerometers, and Fitbits were used. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials or cluster randomized clinical trials that evaluated the use of wearable PA trackers, such as pedometers, accelerometers, or fitness trackers, were included. Trials were excluded if they assessed the trackers only as measuring tools of PA before and after another intervention, they required participants to be hospitalized, assessors were not blinded to the trackers, or they used a tracker to measure the effect of a pharmacological treatment on PA among individuals. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was mean difference in PA levels. When the scale was different across studies, standardized mean differences were calculated. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic and explored using mixed-effects metaregression. Results: A total of 38 randomized clinical trials with 4203 participants were eligible in the systematic review; 29 trials evaluated pedometers, and 9 evaluated accelerometers or fitness trackers. Four studies did not provide amenable outcome data, leaving 34 trials (3793 participants) for the meta-analysis. Intervention vs comparator analysis showed a significant association of wearable tracker use with increased PA levels overall (standardized mean difference, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.46-0.97; I2 = 88%; 95% CI, 84.3%-90.8%; P < .001) in studies with short to medium follow-up for median of 15 (range, 12-52) weeks. Multivariable metaregression showed an association between increased PA levels and interventions that involved face-to-face consultations with facilitators (23 studies; ß = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.11 to -0.01), included men (23 studies; ß = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.01-0.96), and assessed pedometer-based interventions (26 studies; ß = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.02-0.32). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, interventions that combined wearable activity trackers with health professional consultations were associated with significant improvements in PA levels among people with cardiometabolic conditions.
Asunto(s)
Factores de Riesgo Cardiometabólico , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles/normas , Humanos , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether and what user data are collected by health related mobile applications (mHealth apps), to characterise the privacy conduct of all the available mHealth apps on Google Play, and to gauge the associated risks to privacy. DESIGN: Cross sectional study SETTING: Health related apps developed for the Android mobile platform, available in the Google Play store in Australia and belonging to the medical and health and fitness categories. PARTICIPANTS: Users of 20 991 mHealth apps (8074 medical and 12 917 health and fitness found in the Google Play store: in-depth analysis was done on 15 838 apps that did not require a download or subscription fee compared with 8468 baseline non-mHealth apps. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were characterisation of the data collection operations in the apps code and of the data transmissions in the apps traffic; analysis of the primary recipients for each type of user data; presence of adverts and trackers in the app traffic; audit of the app privacy policy and compliance of the privacy conduct with the policy; and analysis of complaints in negative app reviews. RESULTS: 88.0% (n=18 472) of mHealth apps included code that could potentially collect user data. 3.9% (n=616) of apps transmitted user information in their traffic. Most data collection operations in apps code and data transmissions in apps traffic involved external service providers (third parties). The top 50 third parties were responsible for most of the data collection operations in app code and data transmissions in app traffic (68.0% (2140), collectively). 23.0% (724) of user data transmissions occurred on insecure communication protocols. 28.1% (5903) of apps provided no privacy policies, whereas 47.0% (1479) of user data transmissions complied with the privacy policy. 1.3% (3609) of user reviews raised concerns about privacy. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis found serious problems with privacy and inconsistent privacy practices in mHealth apps. Clinicians should be aware of these and articulate them to patients when determining the benefits and risks of mHealth apps.
Asunto(s)
Aplicaciones Móviles/normas , Privacidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Telemedicina/instrumentación , Australia/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Monitores de Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Uso de Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Aplicaciones Móviles/tendencias , Teléfono Inteligente/instrumentación , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Reliable estimates of habitual sleep, physical activity, and sedentary time are essential to investigate the associations between these behaviours and health outcomes. While the number of days needed and hours/day for estimates of physical activity and sedentary time are generally known, the criteria for sleep estimates are more uncertain. The objective of this study was to identify the number of nights needed to obtain reliable estimates of habitual sleep behaviour using the GENEActiv wrist worn accelerometer. The number of days to obtain reliable estimate of physical activity was also examined. METHODS: Data was used from a two-year longitudinal study. Children wore an accelerometer for up to 8 days 24 h/day across three timepoints. The sample included 2,745 children (51 % girls) between the ages of 7-12-years-old (mean = 9.8 years, SD = 1.1 year) with valid accelerometer data from any timepoint. Reliability estimates were calculated for sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep onset, wake time, time in bed, light physical activity, moderate physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, vigorous physical activity, and sedentary time. RESULTS: Intraclass correlations and the Spearman Brown prophecy formula were used to determine the nights and days needed for reliable estimates. We found that between 3 and 5 nights were needed to achieve acceptable reliability (ICC = 0.7) in sleep outcomes, while physical activity and sedentary time outcomes required between 3 and 4 days. CONCLUSIONS: To obtain reliable estimates, researchers should consider these minimum criteria when designing their studies and prepare strategies to ensure sufficient wear time compliance.
Asunto(s)
Acelerometría/normas , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Conducta Sedentaria , Sueño/fisiología , Niño , Femenino , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/normas , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of three consumer-based activity monitors, Fitbit Charge 2, Fitbit Alta, and the Apple Watch 2, all worn on the wrist, in estimating step counts, moderate-to-vigorous minutes (MVPA), and heart rate in a free-living setting. METHODS: Forty-eight participants (31 females, 17 males; ages 18-59) were asked to wear the three consumer-based monitors mentioned above on the wrist, concurrently with a Yamax pedometer as the criterion for step count, an ActiGraph GT3X+ (ActiGraph) for MVPA, and a Polar H7 chest strap for heart rate. Participants wore the monitors for a 24-hour free-living condition without changing their usual active routine. MVPA was calculated in bouts of ≥10 minutes. Pearson correlation, mean absolute percent error (MAPE), and equivalence testing were used to evaluate the measurement agreement. RESULTS: The average step counts recorded for each device were as follows: 11,734 (Charge2), 11,922 (Alta), 11,550 (Apple2), and 10,906 (Yamax). The correlations in steps for the above monitors ranged from 0.84 to 0.95 and MAPE ranged from 17.1% to 35.5%. For MVPA minutes, the average were 76.3 (Charge2), 63.3 (Alta), 49.5 (Apple2), and 47.8 (ActiGraph) minutes accumulated in bouts of 10 or greater minutes. The correlation from MVPA estimation for above monitors were 0.77, 0.91, and 0.66. MAPE from MVPA estimation ranged from 44.7% to 55.4% compared to ActiGraph. For heart rate, correlation for Charge2 and Apple2 was higher for sedentary behavior and lower for MVPA. The MAPE ranged from 4% to 16%. CONCLUSION: All three consumer monitors estimated step counts fairly accurately, and both the Charge2 and Apple2 reported reasonable heart rate estimation. However, all monitors substantially underestimated MVPA in free-living settings.
Asunto(s)
Metabolismo Energético/fisiología , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Conducta Sedentaria , Acelerometría/normas , Actigrafía/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Condiciones Sociales , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Self-monitoring is critical for weight management, but little is known about lapses in the use of digital self-monitoring. The objectives of this study were to examine whether lapses in self-weighing and wearing activity trackers are associated with weight and activity outcomes and to identify objective predictors of lapses. METHODS: Participants (N = 160, BMI = 25.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2 , 33.1 ± 4.6 years old) were drawn from a sample of young adults in the Study of Novel Approaches to Prevention-Extension (SNAP-E) weight gain prevention trial. Analyses evaluated associations between weighing and tracker lapses and changes in weight and steps/day during the first 90 days after receiving a smart scale and activity tracker. RESULTS: On average, participants self-weighed 49.6% of days and wore activity trackers 75.2% of days. Every 1-day increase in a weighing lapse was associated with a 0.06-lb gain. Lapses in tracker wear were not associated with changes in steps/day or weight between wear days. Weight gain predicted a higher likelihood of starting a lapse in weighing and tracker wear, whereas lower steps predicted a higher likelihood of a tracker lapse. CONCLUSIONS: Weight gain may discourage adherence to self-monitoring. Future research could examine just-in-time supports to anticipate and reduce the frequency or length of self-monitoring lapses.
Asunto(s)
Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Aumento de Peso/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Like many wearables, flash glucose monitoring relies on user compliance and is subject to missing data. As recent research is beginning to utilise glucose technologies as behaviour change tools, it is important to understand whether missing data are tolerable. Complete Freestyle Libre data files were amputed to remove 1-6 h of data both at random and over mealtimes (breakfast, lunch, and dinner). Absolute percent errors (MAPE) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to evaluate agreement and reliability. Thirty-two (91%) participants provided at least 1 complete day (24 h) of data (age: 44.8 ± 8.6 years, female: 18 (56%); mean fasting glucose: 5.0 ± 0.6 mmol/L). Mean and continuous overall net glycaemic action (CONGA) (60 min) were robust to data loss (MAPE ≤3%). Larger errors were calculated for standard deviation, coefficient of variation (CV) and mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) at increasing missingness (MAPE: 2%-10%, 2%-9%, and 4%-18%, respectively). ICC decreased as missing data increased, with most indicating excellent reliability (>0.9) apart from certain MAGE ICCs, which indicated good reliability (0.84-0.9). Researchers and clinicians should be aware of the potential for larger errors when reporting standard deviation, CV, and MAGE at higher rates of data loss in nondiabetic populations. But where mean and CONGA are of interest, data loss is less of a concern. Novelty: As research now utilises flash glucose monitoring as behavioural change tools in nondiabetic populations, it is important to consider the influence of missing data. Glycaemic variability indices of mean and CONGA are robust to data loss, but standard deviation, CV, and MAGE are influenced at higher rates of missingness.
Asunto(s)
Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/instrumentación , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Monitores de Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/normas , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Individuals with disabilities have high prevalence of sedentary lifestyle, obesity, and cardiometabolic disease. Physical activity monitors (i.e., step counters) are ill-suited for tracking wheelchair pushes. The study purpose was to investigate the validity of a consumer-level fitness tracker (Apple Watch) designed for wheelchair users. METHODS: Validation study. A total of 15 wheelchair users with disabilities and 15 able-bodied individuals completed 3-min bouts of wheelchair propulsion on a treadmill and arm ergometry at pre-determined cadences as well as overground obstacle and Figure 8 courses. Tracker stroke counts were compared against direct observation. RESULTS: We found no interaction of tracker counts and ability status across all tasks (P≥0.550), so results are presented for the combined sample. For treadmill tasks, Bland-Altman analysis (bias±limits of agreement) showed good agreement for only higher-rate fixed-frequency tasks (-15±48, -1±14, 0±5, and 0±27 for low, moderate, high, and variable cadence, respectively). Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was 22%, 3%, 1%, and 6%, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (95% confidence intervals) were -0.18 (-0.51-0.20), 0.47 (0.13-0.71), 0.98 (0.96-0.99), and 0.22 (-0.16-0.54). We found significant overestimation by the tracker at low frequency (P<0.01). Arm ergometry showed good agreement across all cadences (0±5, -1±3, 0±8, 6±6). MAPE was 1%, 1%, 1%, and 4%. ICCs were 0.88 (0.77-0.94), 0.95 (0.89-0.97), 0.88 (0.76-0.94), and 0.97 (0.87-0.97). We found minimal (2rpm) but significant differences at variable cadence (P<0.01). Overground tasks showed poor agreement for casual-pace and fast-pace obstacle course and Figure 8 task (-5±18, 0±23, and -18±32, respectively). MAPE was 15%, 18%, 21% and ICCs were 0.90 (0.79-0.95), 0.79 (0.59-0.90), and 0.82 (0.64-0.91). Significant differences were found for propulsion at casual pace (P<0.01) and the Figure 8 task (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Apple Watch is suitable for tracking high-frequency standardized (i.e., treadmill) pushing and arm ergometry but not low-frequency pushing or overground tasks.
Asunto(s)
Monitores de Ejercicio , Silla de Ruedas , Ejercicio Físico , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Humanos , MovimientoRESUMEN
Consumer wearable and smartphone devices provide an accessible means to objectively measure physical activity (PA) through step counts. With the increasing proliferation of this technology, consumers, practitioners and researchers are interested in leveraging these devices as a means to track and facilitate PA behavioural change. However, while the acceptance of these devices is increasing, the validity of many consumer devices have not been rigorously and transparently evaluated. The Towards Intelligent Health and Well-Being Network of Physical Activity Assessment (INTERLIVE) is a joint European initiative of six universities and one industrial partner. The consortium was founded in 2019 and strives to develop best-practice recommendations for evaluating the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones. This expert statement presents a best-practice consumer wearable and smartphone step counter validation protocol. A two-step process was used to aggregate data and form a scientific foundation for the development of an optimal and feasible validation protocol: (1) a systematic literature review and (2) additional searches of the wider literature pertaining to factors that may introduce bias during the validation of these devices. The systematic literature review process identified 2897 potential articles, with 85 articles deemed eligible for the final dataset. From the synthesised data, we identified a set of six key domains to be considered during design and reporting of validation studies: target population, criterion measure, index measure, validation conditions, data processing and statistical analysis. Based on these six domains, a set of key variables of interest were identified and a 'basic' and 'advanced' multistage protocol for the validation of consumer wearable and smartphone step counters was developed. The INTERLIVE consortium recommends that the proposed protocol is used when considering the validation of any consumer wearable or smartphone step counter. Checklists have been provided to guide validation protocol development and reporting. The network also provide guidance for future research activities, highlighting the imminent need for the development of feasible alternative 'gold-standard' criterion measures for free-living validation. Adherence to these validation and reporting standards will help ensure methodological and reporting consistency, facilitating comparison between consumer devices. Ultimately, this will ensure that as these devices are integrated into standard medical care, consumers, practitioners, industry and researchers can use this technology safely and to its full potential.
Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación , Consenso , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Teléfono Inteligente/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Tecnología Biomédica , Niño , Europa (Continente) , Ejercicio Físico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Universidades/organización & administración , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is difficult to objectively evaluate chemotherapy-related adverse events early in elderly patients with urothelial carcinoma. A delayed response causes a reduction in quality of life (QoL). Wearable activity systems that objectively record life logs have recently been used. OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to verify the reliability and effectiveness of a wearable activity system (Fitbit) to monitor subjective symptoms in an objective manner during chemotherapy for elderly patients with urothelial cancer (UC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cohort prospective study. Elderly patients with UC were enrolled who received short hydration gemcitabine and cisplatin (shGC) combination therapy at Nagoya City University Hospital from January 2018 to March 2020. A Fitbit was used to monitor heart rate, distance moved, and cardio zone time. Heart rate was also monitored by an oscillometric method. The relationship between Fitbit recordings and perceived adverse events, such as fatigue, constipation and nausea, observed during chemotherapy was investigated using a general linear mixed effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 28 inpatients were enrolled and observed for a total of 824 days. A significant, moderately strong correlation was found between two measurements of heart rate (Pearson's r = 0.65, p < 0.05). The measurement of fatigue using Fitbit was effective (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Fitbit monitoring can measure the QoL of a patient and was useful for monitoring elderly patients with UC undergoing shGC therapy in an outpatient setting. Fitbit may be useful for monitoring outpatients and their QoL during chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia/métodos , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias Urológicas/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Commercially acquired wearable activity trackers such as the Fitbit provide objective, accurate measurements of physically active time and step counts, but it is unclear whether these measurements are more clinically meaningful than self-reported physical activity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare self-reported physical activity to Fitbit-measured step counts and then determine which is a stronger predictor of BMI by using data collected over the same period reflecting comparable physical activities. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data collected by the Health eHeart Study, a large mobile health study of cardiovascular health and disease. Adults who linked commercially acquired Fitbits used in free-living conditions with the Health eHeart Study and completed an International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) between 2013 and 2019 were enrolled (N=1498). Fitbit step counts were used to quantify time by activity intensity in a manner comparable to the IPAQ classifications of total active time and time spent being sedentary, walking, or doing moderate activities or vigorous activities. Fitbit steps per day were computed as a measure of the overall activity for exploratory comparisons with IPAQ-measured overall activity (metabolic equivalent of task [MET]-h/wk). Measurements of physical activity were directly compared by Spearman rank correlation. Strengths of associations with BMI for Fitbit versus IPAQ measurements were compared using multivariable robust regression in the subset of participants with BMI and covariates measured. RESULTS: Correlations between synchronous paired measurements from Fitbits and the IPAQ ranged in strength from weak to moderate (0.09-0.48). In the subset with BMI and covariates measured (n=586), Fitbit-derived predictors were generally stronger predictors of BMI than self-reported predictors. For example, an additional hour of Fitbit-measured vigorous activity per week was associated with nearly a full point reduction in BMI (-0.84 kg/m2, 95% CI -1.35 to -0.32) in adjusted analyses, whereas the association between self-reported vigorous activity measured by IPAQ and BMI was substantially smaller in magnitude (-0.17 kg/m2, 95% CI -0.34 to -0.00; P<.001 versus Fitbit) and was dominated by the Fitbit-derived predictor when compared head-to-head in a single adjusted multivariable model. Similar patterns of associations with BMI, with Fitbit dominating self-report, were seen for moderate activity and total active time and in comparisons between overall Fitbit steps per day and IPAQ MET-h/wk on standardized scales. CONCLUSIONS: Fitbit-measured physical activity was more strongly associated with BMI than self-reported physical activity, particularly for moderate activity, vigorous activity, and summary measures of total activity. Consumer-marketed wearable activity trackers such as the Fitbit may be useful for measuring health-relevant physical activity in clinical practice and research.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Monitores de Ejercicio , Autoinforme , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Monitores de Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , CaminataRESUMEN
Considering the need for functional physical activity (PA) measures in PA settings, this study sought to determine the technical adequacy of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) and the Fitbit Flex-2, two instruments with promising features for wide use, using the Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer as the criterion reference. A total of 218 Greek children (94 boys, 124 girls; mean age = 10.99 ± 1.52 years) volunteered to join in. Participants wore the PA trackers for seven days and completed the PAQ-C. Moreover, a sub-group (n = 60) recompleted the PAQ-C after a week. Results revealed acceptable internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability for the PAQ-C. Regarding concurrent validity, weak to moderate correlations with PA parameters recorded by the GT3X+ were revealed for the total PAQ-C and were excellent for the Flex-2, while a Bland-Altman plot indicated good agreement. Finally, in alignment with relevant literature, significant gender, but no age, differences were found in participants' PA records in all the tools applied. The above results support the use of the PAQ-C and the Fitbit Flex-2 in children. Considering that they shed light into different parameters of children's habitual PA, their combined utilisation, providing comprehensive information, is strongly recommended.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Monitores de Ejercicio , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Grecia , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Physical activity trackers (PATs) such as apps and wearable devices (eg, sports watches, heart rate monitors) are increasingly being used by young adolescents. Despite the potential of PATs to help monitor and improve moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) behaviors, there is a lack of research that confirms an association between PAT ownership or use and physical activity behaviors at the population level. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the ownership and use of PATs in youth and their associations with physical activity behaviors, including daily MVPA, sports club membership, and active travel, in 2 nationally representative samples of young adolescent males and females in Finland and Ireland. METHODS: Comparable data were gathered in the 2018 Finnish School-aged Physical Activity (F-SPA 2018, n=3311) and the 2018 Irish Children's Sport Participation and Physical Activity (CSPPA 2018, n=4797) studies. A cluster analysis was performed to obtain the patterns of PAT ownership and usage by adolescents (age, 11-15 years). Four similar clusters were identified across Finnish and Irish adolescents: (1) no PATs, (2) PAT owners, (3) app users, and (4) wearable device users. Adjusted binary logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate how PAT clusters were associated with physical activity behaviors, including daily MVPA, membership of sports clubs, and active travel, after stratification by gender. RESULTS: The proportion of app ownership among Finnish adolescents (2038/3311, 61.6%) was almost double that of their Irish counterparts (1738/4797, 36.2%). Despite these differences, the clustering patterns of PATs were similar between the 2 countries. App users were more likely to take part in daily MVPA (males, odds ratio [OR] 1.27, 95% CI 1.04-1.55; females, OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.20-1.85) and be members of sports clubs (males, OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.62; females, OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.07-1.50) compared to the no PATs cluster, after adjusting for country, age, family affluence, and disabilities. These associations, after the same adjustments, were even stronger for wearable device users to participate in daily MVPA (males, OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.49-2.23; females, OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.80-2.82) and be members of sports clubs (males, OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.55-2.88; females, OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.71-2.52). Significant associations were observed between male users of wearable devices and taking part in active travel behavior (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.86). CONCLUSIONS: Although Finnish adolescents report more ownership of PATs than Irish adolescents, the patterns of use and ownership remain similar among the cohorts. The findings of our study show that physical activity behaviors were positively associated with wearable device users and app users. These findings were similar between males and females. Given the cross-sectional nature of this data, the relationship between using apps or wearable devices and enhancing physical activity behaviors requires further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles/normas , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Irlanda , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most commercial activity trackers are developed as consumer devices and not as clinical devices. The aim is to monitor and motivate sport activities, healthy living, and similar wellness purposes, and the devices are not designed to support care management in a clinical context. There are great expectations for using wearable sensor devices in health care settings, and the separate realms of wellness tracking and disease self-monitoring are increasingly becoming blurred. However, patients' experiences with activity tracking technologies designed for use outside the clinical context have received little academic attention. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to contribute to understanding how patients with a chronic disease experience activity data from consumer self-tracking devices related to self-care and their chronic illness. Our research question was: "How do patients with heart disease experience activity data in relation to self-care and chronic illness?" METHODS: We conducted a qualitative interview study with patients with chronic heart disease (n=27) who had an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator. Patients were invited to wear a FitBit Alta HR wearable activity tracker for 3-12 months and provide their perspectives on their experiences with step, sleep, and heart rate data. The average age was 57.2 years (25 men and 2 women), and patients used the tracker for 4-49 weeks (mean 26.1 weeks). Semistructured interviews (n=66) were conducted with patients 2-3 times and were analyzed iteratively in workshops using thematic analysis and abductive reasoning logic. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients, 18 related the heart rate, sleep, and step count data directly to their heart disease. Wearable activity trackers actualized patients' experiences across 3 dimensions with a spectrum of contrasting experiences: (1) knowing, which spanned gaining insight and evoking doubts; (2) feeling, which spanned being reassured and becoming anxious; and (3) evaluating, which spanned promoting improvements and exposing failure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' experiences could reside more on one end of the spectrum, could reside across all 3 dimensions, or could combine contrasting positions and even move across the spectrum over time. Activity data from wearable devices may be a resource for self-care; however, the data may simultaneously constrain and create uncertainty, fear, and anxiety. By showing how patients experience self-tracking data across dimensions of knowing, feeling, and evaluating, we point toward the richness and complexity of these data experiences in the context of chronic illness and self-care.
Asunto(s)
Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Cardiopatías/rehabilitación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Autocuidado/métodos , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles/normas , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Commercial physical activity monitors have wide utility in the assessment of physical activity in research and clinical settings, however, the removal of devices results in missing data and has the potential to bias study conclusions. This study aimed to evaluate methods to address missingness in data collected from commercial activity monitors. METHODS: This study utilised 1526 days of near complete data from 109 adults participating in a European weight loss maintenance study (NoHoW). We conducted simulation experiments to test a novel scaling methodology (NoHoW method) and alternative imputation strategies (overall/individual mean imputation, overall/individual multiple imputation, Kalman imputation and random forest imputation). Methods were compared for hourly, daily and 14-day physical activity estimates for steps, total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) and time in physical activity categories. In a second simulation study, individual multiple imputation, Kalman imputation and the NoHoW method were tested at different positions and quantities of missingness. Equivalence testing and root mean squared error (RMSE) were used to evaluate the ability of each of the strategies relative to the true data. RESULTS: The NoHoW method, Kalman imputation and multiple imputation methods remained statistically equivalent (p<0.05) for all physical activity metrics at the 14-day level. In the second simulation study, RMSE tended to increase with increased missingness. Multiple imputation showed the smallest RMSE for Steps and TDEE at lower levels of missingness (<19%) and the Kalman and NoHoW methods were generally superior for imputing time in physical activity categories. CONCLUSION: Individual centred imputation approaches (NoHoW method, Kalman imputation and individual Multiple imputation) offer an effective means to reduce the biases associated with missing data from activity monitors and maximise data retention.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Monitores de Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos de Investigación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , Sesgo , Peso Corporal/fisiología , Simulación por Computador , Metabolismo Energético/fisiología , Femenino , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Pérdida de Peso/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Commercially available physical activity trackers are very popular in the general population and are increasingly common in clinical and research settings. The marketfor activity trackers are rapidly expanding, requiring them to be validated on an ongoing basis. Different approaches have been used for validating these devices. Studies using treadmills shows good step-counting accuracy although test performed in field tests settings are limited. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does step-counting validity differ between a field test and a treadmill protocol for different types of activity trackers? METHODS: Thirty healthy subjects participated in this study, mean age was 28.2 (± 4.33) years, body mass 78.9 (± 12.9) kg, and height 178.5 (± 9.7) cm. A treadmill protocol with three different walking speeds (2, 3 and 4 km/h) and a 982 m field test was used. During the tests, participants' feet were filmed using a waist-mounted camera. The number of steps were extracted from the video data and used for comparison with four different step counters: a) Polar M200; b) Polar A300; c) Dunlop pedometer; d) Samsung Galaxy S9 smartphone. Validity and agreement determined was determined with the use of Bland-Altman plot and Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: Validity was higher for the field test compared to the 4 km/h treadmill test for all tested devices. The smartphone was the most accurate in terms of error, validity and agreement for both the treadmill and field test. All devices performed poorly for the 2 km/h treadmill test and only the smartphone performed well at 3 km/h. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study show that step counting validity and error obtained during treadmill walking is not similar to a field test. Future validation studies of activity trackers should consider this when designing a protocol. The smartphone had the lowest mean bias during the field test.
Asunto(s)
Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Teléfono Inteligente , Caminata , Actigrafía/instrumentación , Adulto , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Pie , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Velocidad al Caminar , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Pulmón/virología , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Triaje/normas , Prueba de Paso/normas , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Salud Laboral/normas , Oximetría/normas , Consumo de Oxígeno , Pandemias , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Neumonía Viral/virología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Prueba de Paso/efectos adversos , Prueba de Paso/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
The exponential growth of the number and variety of IoT devices and applications for personal use, as well as the improvement of their quality and performance, facilitates the realization of intelligent eHealth concepts. Nowadays, it is easier than ever for individuals to monitor themselves, quantify, and log their everyday activities in order to gain insights about their body's performance and receive recommendations and incentives to improve it. Of course, in order for such systems to live up to the promise, given the treasure trove of data that is collected, machine learning techniques need to be integrated in the processing and analysis of the data. This systematic and automated quantification, logging, and analysis of personal data, using IoT and AI technologies, have given birth to the phenomenon of Quantified-Self. This work proposes a prototype decentralized Quantified-Self application, built on top of a dedicated IoT gateway that aggregates and analyzes data from multiple sources, such as biosignal sensors and wearables, and performs analytics on it.
Asunto(s)
Descubrimiento del Conocimiento , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Monitores de Ejercicio/normas , Monitores de Ejercicio/tendencias , Humanos , Descubrimiento del Conocimiento/métodos , Aprendizaje Automático , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , TelemedicinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Activity trackers are becoming increasingly popular, but patients often hesitate to share the data from such devices with their health care providers. Researchers have shown that sharing everyday health data with physicians can foster greater patient engagement. OBJECTIVES: This research is intended to investigate activity tracker users' decisions regarding the sharing of their activity tracker data with physicians, as well as to build a stage based framework for improving patient engagement by fostering such data sharing. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of interview records of 12 adults, who had used Fitbit activity tracking devices for up to two years, identifying emotions and experiences surrounding their tendencies to share physical exercise data with a physician. RESULTS: This research used the subjects' emotions and considerations regarding the decision over whether to share exercise data with physicians to create a stage based framework with three stages: cognisance, tangible evidence and supportive feedback. CONCLUSION: The tendency to progress towards three stages with greater patient-physician engagement appears to increase with health risk profile and with reduced data privacy concerns. This framework contributes to ongoing discussions about establishing patient-practitioner engagement, based around patients' shared personal data collection.