The Value of Radiomics Features Based on HRCT in Predicting whether the Lung Sub-Centimeter Pure Ground Glass Nodule is Benign or Malignant.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, a radiomics model was created based on High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) images to noninvasively predict whether the sub-centimeter pure Ground Glass Nodule (pGGN) is benign or malignant. METHODS: A total of 235 patients (251 sub-centimeter pGGNs) who underwent preoperative HRCT scans and had postoperative pathology results were retrospectively evaluated. The nodules were randomized in a 7:3 ratio to the training (n=175) and the validation cohort (n=76). The volume of interest was delineated in the thin-slice lung window, from which 1316 radiomics features were extracted. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was used to select the radiomics features. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to evaluate the independent risk variables. The performance was assessed by obtaining Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for the clinical, radiomics, and combined models, and then the Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) assessed the clinical applicability of each model. RESULTS: Sex, volume, shape, and intensity mean were chosen by univariate analysis to establish the clinical model. Two radiomics features were retained by LASSO regression to build the radiomics model. In the training cohort, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the radiomics (AUC=0.844) and combined model (AUC=0.871) was higher than the clinical model (AUC=0.773). In evaluating whether or not the sub-centimeter pGGN is benign, the DCA demonstrated that the radiomics and combined model had a greater overall net benefit than the clinical model. CONCLUSION: The radiomics model may be useful in predicting the benign and malignant sub-centimeter pGGN before surgery.

Patient satisfaction with letter-based communication of LCS pulmonary nodule results.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze patient satisfaction with letter-based communication of lung cancer screening (LCS) pulmonary nodule results. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial of LCS between May and December 2019. METHODS: All participants came from a prospective randomized controlled study on pulmonary nodule results in LCS with low-dose CT (LDCT) to analyze patient satisfaction, perception of information received via letters, preferred methods of receiving results, and dissatisfaction-related characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were detected to have pulmonary nodules among 600 recruited participants in the lung cancer high-risk group screened using LDCT. Most of the patients were satisfied with receiving pulmonary nodule results via letters (78.4%; n = 120) and agreed that the letters contained an appropriate amount of information (83.7%; n = 128). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that satisfaction was related to age (OR, 0.905; 95% CI, 0.832-0.985), education level (OR, 0.367; 95% CI, 0.041-3.250), no family history of cancer (OR, 0.100; 95% CI, 0.011-0.914), and the number of nodules (OR, 6.028; 95% CI, 1.641-22.141). Of the patients who reported dissatisfaction with letter-based communication (7.2%; n = 11), the most common reasons cited were that they contained insufficient patient education materials and that it was difficult to comprehend the medical terminology. The majority of participants (61.4%; n = 94) reported that they would prefer the letter-based communication. No correlation was identified between satisfaction and gender, smoking status, alcohol consumption, risk factors, nodule size, or nodule location. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were generally satisfied with receiving their LCS pulmonary nodule results via letters, reporting that the letters included adequate information about their diagnosis and follow-up steps. This may provide a basis for feasible result communication via letters for cancer screening programs in underdeveloped regions in China.

Artificial intelligence-based graded training of pulmonary nodules for junior radiology residents and medical imaging students.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficiency of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnosis system in the pulmonary nodule detection and diagnosis training of junior radiology residents and medical imaging students. METHODS: The participants were divided into three groups. Medical imaging students of Grade 2020 in the Jinzhou Medical University were randomly divided into Groups 1 and 2; Group 3 comprised junior radiology residents. Group 1 used the traditional case-based teaching mode; Groups 2 and 3 used the 'AI intelligent assisted diagnosis system' teaching mode. All participants performed localisation, grading and qualitative diagnosed of 1,057 lung nodules in 420 cases for seven rounds of testing after training. The sensitivity and number of false positive nodules in different densities (solid, pure ground glass, mixed ground glass and calcification), sizes (less than 5 mm, 5-10 mm and over 10 mm) and positions (subpleural, peripheral and central) of the pulmonary nodules in the three groups were detected. The pathological results and diagnostic opinions of radiologists formed the criteria. The detection rate, diagnostic compliance rate, false positive number/case, and kappa scores of the three groups were compared. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in baseline test scores between Groups 1 and 2, and there were statistical differences with Group 3 (P = 0.036 and 0.011). The detection rate of solid, pure ground glass and calcified nodules; small-, medium-, and large-diameter nodules; and peripheral nodules were significantly different among the three groups (P<0.05). After seven rounds of training, the diagnostic compliance rate increased in all three groups, with the largest increase in Group 2. The average kappa score increased from 0.508 to 0.704. The average kappa score for Rounds 1-4 and 5-7 were 0.595 and 0.714, respectively. The average kappa scores of Groups 1,2 and 3 increased from 0.478 to 0.658, 0.417 to 0.757, and 0.638 to 0.791, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AI assisted diagnosis system is a valuable tool for training junior radiology residents and medical imaging students to perform pulmonary nodules detection and diagnosis.

Better performance of deep learning pulmonary nodule detection using chest radiography with pixel level labels in reference to computed tomography: data quality matters.

Labeling errors can significantly impact the performance of deep learning models used for screening chest radiographs. The deep learning model for detecting pulmonary nodules is particularly vulnerable to such errors, mainly because normal chest radiographs and those with nodules obscured by ribs appear similar. Thus, high-quality datasets referred to chest computed tomography (CT) are required to prevent the misclassification of nodular chest radiographs as normal. From this perspective, a deep learning strategy employing chest radiography data with pixel-level annotations referencing chest CT scans may improve nodule detection and localization compared to image-level labels. We trained models using a National Institute of Health chest radiograph-based labeling dataset and an AI-HUB CT-based labeling dataset, employing DenseNet architecture with squeeze-and-excitation blocks. We developed four models to assess whether CT versus chest radiography and pixel-level versus image-level labeling would improve the deep learning model's performance to detect nodules. The models' performance was evaluated using two external validation datasets. The AI-HUB dataset with image-level labeling outperformed the NIH dataset (AUC 0.88 vs 0.71 and 0.78 vs. 0.73 in two external datasets, respectively; both p < 0.001). However, the AI-HUB data annotated at the pixel level produced the best model (AUC 0.91 and 0.86 in external datasets), and in terms of nodule localization, it significantly outperformed models trained with image-level annotation data, with a Dice coefficient ranging from 0.36 to 0.58. Our findings underscore the importance of accurately labeled data in developing reliable deep learning algorithms for nodule detection in chest radiography.

Bronchoscopy with and without needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for peripheral lung nodule diagnosis: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CLEVER trial).

INTRODUCTION: Despite many technological advances, the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopic peripheral lung nodule analysis remains limited due to frequent mispositioning. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) enables real-time microscopic feedback on needle positioning, potentially improving the sampling location and diagnostic yield. Previous studies have defined and validated nCLE criteria for malignancy, airway and lung parenchyma. Larger studies demonstrating the effect of nCLE on diagnostic yield are lacking. We aim to investigate if nCLE-imaging integrated with conventional bronchoscopy results in a higher diagnostic yield compared with conventional bronchoscopy without nCLE. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a parallel-group randomised controlled trial. Recruitment is performed at pulmonology outpatient clinics in universities and general hospitals in six different European countries and one hospital in the USA. Consecutive patients with a for malignancy suspected peripheral lung nodule (10-30 mm) with an indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy will be screened, and 208 patients will be included. Web-based randomisation (1:1) between the two procedures will be performed. The primary outcome is diagnostic yield. Secondary outcomes include diagnostic sensitivity for malignancy, needle repositionings, procedure and fluoroscopy duration, and complications. Pathologists will be blinded to procedure type; patients and endoscopists will not. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Primary approval by the Ethics Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Center. Dissemination involves publication in a peer-reviewed journal. SUPPORT: Financial and material support from Mauna Kea Technologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06079970.

Analysis of complication risk factors in preoperative computed tomography-guided hookwire location of pulmonary nodules.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hookwire for computed tomography (CT)-guided pulmonary nodule (PN) localization before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) resection and determine the risk factors for localization-related complications. METHODS: We enrolled 193 patients who underwent preoperative CT-guided PN hookwire localization. The patients were categorized into groups A (103 patients had no complications) and B (90 patients had complications) according to CT and VATS. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for localization-related complications. A numerical rating scale was used to evaluate hookwire localization-induced pain. RESULTS: We successfully performed localization in 173 (89.6%) patients. Pneumothorax was the main complication in 82 patients (42.5%). Patient gender, age, body mass index, tumor diameter, consolidation tumor ratio, pathologic diagnosis, position adjustment during location, lesion location, waiting time for surgery, and pleural adhesions were not significantly different between the two groups. The number of nodules, number of punctures, scapular rest position, and depth of insertion within the lung parenchyma were significant factors for successful localization. Multivariate regression analysis further validated the number of nodules, scapular rest position, and depth of insertion within the lung parenchyma as risk factors for hookwire-localization-related complications. Hookwire localization-induced pain is mainly mild or moderate pre- and postoperatively, and some patients still experience pain 7 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Hookwire preoperative PN localization has a high success rate, but some complications remain. Thus, clinicians should be vigilant and look forward to further improvement.

Risk factors of pneumothorax in computed tomography guided lung nodule marking using autologous blood: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the risk factors of pneumothorax of using computed tomography (CT) guidance to inject autologous blood to locate isolated lung nodules. METHODS: In the First Hospital of Putian City, 92 cases of single small pulmonary nodules were retrospectively analyzed between November 2019 and March 2023. Before each surgery, autologous blood was injected, and the complications of each case, such as pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage, were recorded. Patient sex, age, position at positioning, and nodule type, size, location, and distance from the visceral pleura were considered. Similarly, the thickness of the chest wall, the depth and duration of the needle-lung contact, the length of the positioning procedure, and complications connected to the patient's positioning were noted. Logistics single-factor and multi-factor variable analyses were used to identify the risk factors for pneumothorax. The multi-factor logistics analysis was incorporated into the final nomogram prediction model for modeling, and a nomogram was established. RESULTS: Logistics analysis suggested that the nodule size and the contact depth between the needle and lung tissue were independent risk factors for pneumothorax. CONCLUSION: The factors associated with pneumothorax after localization are smaller nodules and deeper contact between the needle and lung tissue.

Clinical application of CT-assisted body surface localization combined with intraoperative stereotactic anatomical localization in thoracoscopic lung nodule resection: a single-centre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Today, the detection rate of lung nodules is increasing. Some of these nodules may become malignant. Thus, timely resection of potentially malignant nodules is essential. However, Identifying the location of nonsurface or soft-textured nodules during surgery is challenging. Various localization techniques have been developed to accurately identify lung nodules. Common methods include preoperative CT-guided percutaneous placement of hook wires and microcoils. Nonetheless, these procedures may cause complications such as pneumothorax and haemothorax. Other methods regarding localization of pulmonary nodules have their own drawbacks. We conducted a clinical study which was retrospective to identify a safe, accurate and suitable method for determining lung nodule localization. To evaluate the clinical value of CT-assisted body surface localization combined with intraoperative stereotactic anatomical localization in thoracoscopic lung nodule resection. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 120 patients who underwent lung nodule localization and resection surgery at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, from January 2020 to January 2022. Among them, 30 patients underwent CT-assisted body surface localization combined with intraoperative stereotactic anatomical localization, 30 patients underwent only CT-assisted body surface localization, 30 patients underwent only intraoperative stereotactic anatomical localization, and 30 patients underwent CT-guided percutaneous microcoil localization. The success rates, complication rates, and localization times of the four lung nodule localization methods were statistically analysed. RESULTS: The success rates of CT-assisted body surface localization combined with intraoperative stereotactic anatomical localization and CT-guided percutaneous microcoil localization were both 96.7%, which were significantly higher than the 70.0% success rate in the CT-assisted body surface localization group (P < 0.05). The complication rate in the combined group was 0%, which was significantly lower than the 60% in the microcoil localization group (P < 0.05). The localization time for the combined group was 17.73 ± 2.52 min, which was significantly less than that (27.27 ± 7.61 min) for the microcoil localization group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CT-assisted body surface localization combined with intraoperative stereotactic anatomical localization is a safe, painless, accurate, and reliable method for lung nodule localization.

A nomogram combining CT-based radiomic features with clinical features for the differentiation of benign and malignant cystic pulmonary nodules.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the differentiation between benign and malignant cystic pulmonary nodules poses a significant challenge for clinicians. The objective of this retrospective study was to construct a predictive model for determining the likelihood of malignancy in patients with cystic pulmonary nodules. METHODS: The current study involved 129 patients diagnosed with cystic pulmonary nodules between January 2017 and June 2023 at the Neijiang First People's Hospital. The study gathered the clinical data, preoperative imaging features of chest CT, and postoperative histopathological results for both cohorts. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify independent risk factors, from which a prediction model and nomogram were developed. In addition, The model's performance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration curve analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: A cohort of 129 patients presenting with cystic pulmonary nodules, consisting of 92 malignant and 37 benign lesions, was examined. Logistic data analysis identified a cystic airspace with a mural nodule, spiculation, mural morphology, and the number of cystic cavities as significant independent predictors for discriminating between benign and malignant cystic lung nodules. The nomogram prediction model demonstrated a high level of predictive accuracy, as evidenced by an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.874 (95% CI: 0.804-0.944). Furthermore, the calibration curve of the model displayed satisfactory calibration. DCA proved that the prediction model was useful for clinical application. CONCLUSION: In summary, the risk prediction model for benign and malignant cystic pulmonary nodules has the potential to assist clinicians in the diagnosis of such nodules and enhance clinical decision-making processes.

Advances in the localization of pulmonary nodules: a comprehensive review.

In recent years, with the widespread use of chest CT, the detection rate of pulmonary nodules has significantly increased (Abtin and Brown, J Clin Oncol 31:1002-8, 2013). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is the most commonly used method for suspected malignant nodules. However, for nodules with a diameter less than 1 cm, or located more than 1.5 cm from the pleural edge, especially ground-glass nodules, it is challenging to achieve precise intraoperative localization by manual palpation (Ciriaco et al., Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:429-33, 2004). Therefore, preoperative accurate localization of such nodules becomes a necessary condition for precise resection. This article provides a comprehensive review and analysis of the research progress in pulmonary nodule localization, focusing on four major localization techniques: Percutaneous puncture-assisted localization, Bronchoscopic preoperative pulmonary nodule localization, 3D Printing-Assisted Localization, and intraoperative ultrasound-guided pulmonary nodule localization.

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis Between Primary Lung Cancers Identified as Screening Detected and Incidentally Detected Pulmonary Nodules.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Although the importance of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is increasingly emphasized and implemented, many lung cancers continue to be incidentally detected during routine medical practices, and data on incidentally detected lung cancer (IDLC) remain scarce. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of IDLCs by comparing them with screening-detected lung cancers (SDLCs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, subjects with cT1 (≤3 cm) pulmonary nodules detected on baseline computed tomography (CT), later pathologically confirmed as primary lung cancer in 2015, were included. Patients were categorized into IDLC and SDLC groups based on the setting of the first pulmonary nodule detection. RESULTS: Out of 457 subjects, 129 (28.2%) were IDLCs and 328 (71.8%) were SDLCs. The IDLC group, consisted of older individuals with a higher prevalence of smokers and underlying pulmonary disease, compared to the SDLC group. Adenocarcinomas were more frequently detected in SDLCs (87.5%) than in IDLCs (76.7%, p<0.001). The time to treatment initiation (TTI) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were similar. Multivariate analyses revealed underlying interstitial lung disease, DLCO, solidity of nodules and TNM stage as independent risk factors associated with mortality. Less than 30% of study participants would have been eligible for the current lung cancer screening program. CONCLUSION: The IDLC group was associated with older age, higher rate of smokers, underlying pulmonary disease, and non-adenocarcinoma histology. However, prognosis was similar to that of the SDLC group, attributable to the similarity in TNM stage, strict adherence to guidelines, and short TTI. Furthermore, less than 30% of the participants would have been suitable for the existing lung cancer screening program, indicating a potential need to reconsider the scope for screening candidates.

Non-malignant pathological results from CT-guided biopsy for pulmonary nodules: a predictive model for identifying false-negative results.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy (CTB) procedures are commonly used to aid in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules (PNs). When CTB findings indicate a non-malignant lesion, it is critical to correctly determine false-negative results. Therefore, the current study was designed to construct a predictive model for predicting false-negative cases among patients receiving CTB for PNs who receive non-malignant results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2020, consecutive patients from two centers who received CTB-based non-malignant pathology results while undergoing evaluation for PNs were examined retrospectively. A training cohort was used to discover characteristics that predicted false negative results, allowing the development of a predictive model. The remaining patients were used to establish a testing cohort that served to validate predictive model accuracy. RESULTS: The training cohort included 102 patients with PNs who showed non-malignant pathology results based on CTB. Each patient underwent CTB for a single nodule. Among these patients, 85 and 17 patients, respectively, showed true negative and false negative PNs. Through univariate and multivariate analyses, higher standardized maximum uptake values (SUVmax, P = 0.001) and CTB-based findings of suspected malignant cells (P = 0.043) were identified as being predictive of false negative results. Following that, these two predictors were combined to produce a predictive model. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.945. Furthermore, it demonstrated sensitivity and specificity values of 88.2% and 87.1% respectively. The testing cohort included 62 patients, each of whom had a single PN. When the developed model was used to evaluate this testing cohort, this yielded an AUC value of 0.851. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PNs, the predictive model developed herein demonstrated good diagnostic effectiveness for identifying false-negative CTB-based non-malignant pathology data.

How will lung cancer screening and lung nodule management change the diagnostic and surgical lung cancer landscape?

INTRODUCTION: Implementation of lung cancer screening, with its subsequent findings, is anticipated to change the current diagnostic and surgical lung cancer landscape. This review aimed to identify and present the most updated expert opinion and discuss relevant evidence regarding the impact of lung cancer screening and lung nodule management on the diagnostic and surgical landscape of lung cancer, as well as summarise points for clinical practice. METHODS: This article is based on relevant lectures and talks delivered during the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Respiratory Society Collaborative Course on Thoracic Oncology (February 2023). Original lectures and talks and their relevant references were included. An additional literature search was conducted and peer-reviewed studies in English (December 2022 to June 2023) from the PubMed/Medline databases were evaluated with regards to immediate affinity of the published papers to the original talks presented at the course. An updated literature search was conducted (June 2023 to December 2023) to ensure that updated literature is included within this article. RESULTS: Lung cancer screening suspicious findings are expected to increase the number of diagnostic investigations required therefore impacting on current capacity and resources. Healthcare systems already face a shortage of imaging and diagnostic slots and they are also challenged by the shortage of interventional radiologists. Thoracic surgery will be impacted by the wider lung cancer screening implementation with increased volume and earlier stages of lung cancer. Nonsuspicious findings reported at lung cancer screening will need attention and subsequent referrals where required to ensure participants are appropriately diagnosed and managed and that they are not lost within healthcare systems. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of lung cancer screening requires appropriate mapping of existing resources and infrastructure to ensure a tailored restructuring strategy to ensure that healthcare systems can meet the new needs.

[A design of interactive review for computer aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules based on active learning].

Automatic detection of pulmonary nodule based on computer tomography (CT) images can significantly improve the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. However, there is a lack of effective interactive tools to record the marked results of radiologists in real time and feed them back to the algorithm model for iterative optimization. This paper designed and developed an online interactive review system supporting the assisted diagnosis of lung nodules in CT images. Lung nodules were detected by the preset model and presented to doctors, who marked or corrected the lung nodules detected by the system with their professional knowledge, and then iteratively optimized the AI model with active learning strategy according to the marked results of radiologists to continuously improve the accuracy of the model. The subset 5-9 dataset of the lung nodule analysis 2016(LUNA16) was used for iteration experiments. The precision, F1-score and MioU indexes were steadily improved with the increase of the number of iterations, and the precision increased from 0.213 9 to 0.565 6. The results in this paper show that the system not only uses deep segmentation model to assist radiologists, but also optimizes the model by using radiologists' feedback information to the maximum extent, iteratively improving the accuracy of the model and better assisting radiologists.

Effect of emphysema on AI software and human reader performance in lung nodule detection from low-dose chest CT.

BACKGROUND: Emphysema influences the appearance of lung tissue in computed tomography (CT). We evaluated whether this affects lung nodule detection by artificial intelligence (AI) and human readers (HR). METHODS: Individuals were selected from the "Lifelines" cohort who had undergone low-dose chest CT. Nodules in individuals without emphysema were matched to similar-sized nodules in individuals with at least moderate emphysema. AI results for nodular findings of 30-100 mm3 and 101-300 mm3 were compared to those of HR; two expert radiologists blindly reviewed discrepancies. Sensitivity and false positives (FPs)/scan were compared for emphysema and non-emphysema groups. RESULTS: Thirty-nine participants with and 82 without emphysema were included (n = 121, aged 61 ± 8 years (mean ± standard deviation), 58/121 males (47.9%)). AI and HR detected 196 and 206 nodular findings, respectively, yielding 109 concordant nodules and 184 discrepancies, including 118 true nodules. For AI, sensitivity was 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.77) in emphysema versus 0.71 (0.62-0.78) in non-emphysema, with FPs/scan 0.51 and 0.22, respectively (p = 0.028). For HR, sensitivity was 0.76 (0.65-0.84) and 0.80 (0.72-0.86), with FPs/scan of 0.15 and 0.27 (p = 0.230). Overall sensitivity was slightly higher for HR than for AI, but this difference disappeared after the exclusion of benign lymph nodes. FPs/scan were higher for AI in emphysema than in non-emphysema (p = 0.028), while FPs/scan for HR were higher than AI for 30-100 mm3 nodules in non-emphysema (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: AI resulted in more FPs/scan in emphysema compared to non-emphysema, a difference not observed for HR. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In the creation of a benchmark dataset to validate AI software for lung nodule detection, the inclusion of emphysema cases is important due to the additional number of FPs. KEY POINTS: • The sensitivity of nodule detection by AI was similar in emphysema and non-emphysema. • AI had more FPs/scan in emphysema compared to non-emphysema. • Sensitivity and FPs/scan by the human reader were comparable for emphysema and non-emphysema. • Emphysema and non-emphysema representation in benchmark dataset is important for validating AI.

LNDb v4: pulmonary nodule annotation from medical reports.

Given the high prevalence of lung cancer, an accurate diagnosis is crucial. In the diagnosis process, radiologists play an important role by examining numerous radiology exams to identify different types of nodules. To aid the clinicians' analytical efforts, computer-aided diagnosis can streamline the process of identifying pulmonary nodules. For this purpose, medical reports can serve as valuable sources for automatically retrieving image annotations. Our study focused on converting medical reports into nodule annotations, matching textual information with manually annotated data from the Lung Nodule Database (LNDb)-a comprehensive repository of lung scans and nodule annotations. As a result of this study, we have released a tabular data file containing information from 292 medical reports in the LNDb, along with files detailing nodule characteristics and corresponding matches to the manually annotated data. The objective is to enable further research studies in lung cancer by bridging the gap between existing reports and additional manual annotations that may be collected, thereby fostering discussions about the advantages and disadvantages between these two data types.

Establishment and validation of multiclassification prediction models for pulmonary nodules based on machine learning.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. This study aimed to establish novel multiclassification prediction models based on machine learning (ML) to predict the probability of malignancy in pulmonary nodules (PNs) and to compare with three published models. METHODS: Nine hundred fourteen patients with PNs were collected from four medical institutions (A, B, C and D), which were organized into tables containing clinical features, radiologic features and laboratory test features. Patients were divided into benign lesion (BL), precursor lesion (PL) and malignant lesion (ML) groups according to pathological diagnosis. Approximately 80% of patients in A (total/male: 632/269, age: 57.73 ± 11.06) were randomly selected as a training set; the remaining 20% were used as an internal test set; and the patients in B (total/male: 94/53, age: 60.04 ± 11.22), C (total/male: 94/47, age: 59.30 ± 9.86) and D (total/male: 94/61, age: 62.0 ± 11.09) were used as an external validation set. Logical regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) were used to establish prediction models. Finally, the Mayo model, Peking University People's Hospital (PKUPH) model and Brock model were externally validated in our patients. RESULTS: The AUC values of RF model for MLs, PLs and BLs were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73-0.88), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-0.99) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.88), respectively. The weighted average AUC value of the RF model for the external validation set was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67-0.73), and its AUC values for MLs, PLs and BLs were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.68-0.79), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.88-1.07) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61-0.74), respectively. The AUC values of the Mayo model, PKUPH model and Brock model were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.74), 0.64 (95% CI: 0.58-0.70) and 0.57 (95% CI: 0.49-0.65), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The RF model performed best, and its predictive performance was better than that of the three published models, which may provide a new noninvasive method for the risk assessment of PNs.

Impact of different respiratory gating methods on target delineation and a radiotherapy plan for solitary pulmonary tumors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Respiratory movement has an important impact on the radiotherapy for lung tumor. Respiratory gating technology is helpful to improve the accuracy of target delineation. This study investigated the value of prospective and retrospective respiratory gating simulations in target delineation and radiotherapy plan design for solitary pulmonary tumors (SPTs) in radiotherapy. METHODS: The enrolled patients underwent CT simulation with three-dimensional (3D) CT non gating, prospective respiratory gating, and retrospective respiratory gating simulation. The target volumes were delineated on three sets of CT images, and radiotherapy plans were prepared accordingly. Tumor displacements and movement information obtained using the two respiratory gating approaches, as well as the target volumes and dosimetry parameters in the radiotherapy plan were compared. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in tumor displacement measured using the two gating methods (p > 0.05). However, the internal gross tumor volumes (IGTVs), internal target volumes (ITVs), and planning target volumes (PTVs) based on the retrospective respiratory gating simulation were larger than those obtained using prospective gating (group A: pIGTV = 0.041, pITV = 0.003, pPTV = 0.008; group B: pIGTV = 0.025, pITV = 0.039, pPTV = 0.004). The two-gating PTVs were both smaller than those delineated on 3D non gating images (p < 0.001). V5Gy, V10Gy, V20Gy, V30Gy, and mean lung dose in the two gated radiotherapy plans were lower than those in the 3D non gating plan (p < 0.001); however, no significant difference was observed between the two gating plans (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The application of respiratory gating could reduce the target volume and the radiation dose that the normal lung tissue received. Compared to prospective respiratory gating, the retrospective gating provides more information about tumor movement in PTV.

[Clinical Application of Robotic Assisted Bronchoscopy 
in Peripheral Pulmonary Nodule Biopsy].

With the popularization of chest computed tomography (CT) lung cancer screening, the detection rate of peripheral pulmonary nodules is increasing day by day. Some patients could make clear diagnoses and receive early treatment by obtaining biopsy specimens. Transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) is one of the non-surgical biopsy methods for peripheral pulmonary nodules, which has less trauma and lower incidence of complications compared to percutaneous thoracic needle biopsy (PTNB). However, the diagnostic rate of TBLB is about 70%, which is still inferior to that of PTNB, which is about 90%. Since 2018, robot assisted bronchoscopy systems have been applied in clinical practice. This article reviews their application in further improving the diagnostic rate of peripheral pulmonary nodules by TBLB.
.