RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a modality of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is largely underutilized globally. We analyzed PD utilization, impact of economic status, projected growth and impact of state policy(s) on PD growth in South Asia and Southeast Asia (SA&SEA) region. METHODS: The National Nephrology Societies of the region responded to a questionnaire on KRT practices. The responses were based on the latest registry data, acceptable community-based studies and societal perceptions. The representative countries were divided into high income and higher-middle income (HI & HMI) and low income and lower-middle income (LI & LMI) groups. RESULTS: Data provided by 15 countries showed almost similar percentage of GDP as health expenditure (4%-7%). But there was a significant difference in per capita income (HI & HMI -US$ 28 129 vs. LI & LMI - US$ 1710.2) between the groups. Even after having no significant difference in monthly cost of haemodialysis (HD) and PD in LI & LMI countries, they have poorer PD utilization as compared to HI & HMI countries (3.4% vs. 10.1%); the reason being lack of formal training/incentives and time constraints for the nephrologist while lack of reimbursement and poor general awareness of modalities has been a snag for the patients. The region expects ≥10% PD growth in the near future. Hong Kong and Thailand with 'PD first' policy have the highest PD utilization. CONCLUSION: Important deterrents to PD underutilization were lack of PD centric policies, lackadaisical patient/physician's attitude, lack of structured patient awareness programs, formal training programs and affordability.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Política de Salud/tendencias , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Nefrólogos/tendencias , Nefrología/tendencias , Diálisis Peritoneal/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Asia/epidemiología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Países en Desarrollo/economía , Predicción , Producto Interno Bruto , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Gastos en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Política de Salud/economía , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Renta , Enfermedades Renales/economía , Enfermedades Renales/epidemiología , Nefrólogos/economía , Nefrólogos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Nefrología/economía , Nefrología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Formulación de Políticas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/legislación & jurisprudenciaAsunto(s)
Consentimiento Informado , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Nefrólogos , Nefrología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Diálisis Renal , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Formularios de Consentimiento , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Renales/psicología , Nefrólogos/ética , Nefrólogos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Nefrólogos/psicología , Nefrología/ética , Nefrología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Participación del Paciente , Formulación de Políticas , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/ética , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze malpractice cases involving hemodialysis access to prevent future litigation and improve physician education. METHODS: Jury verdict reviews from the WESTLAW database from 1 January 2005 to 1 January 2015 were reviewed. The search terms "hemodialysis," "dialysis," "graft," "fistula," "AVG," "AVF," "arteriovenous," "catheter," "permacatheter," and "shiley" were used to compile data on the demographics of the defendant, plaintiff, allegation, complication, and verdict. RESULTS: Sixty-six cases involving the litigation pertaining to hemodialysis catheter, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) were obtained. Of these, 55% involved catheter-based hemodialysis access, 18% involved AVF, and 27% involved AVG. The most frequent physician defendants were vascular surgeons (36%), internists (14%), nephrologists (14%), general surgeons (9%), and interventional radiologists (6%). Of the patients, 38% involved were male and the average patient age was 56.3 (standard deviation (SD) = 20.1) years. Region of injury was 50% in the neck or chest, 42% in the arm, and 8% in the groin. Injury was listed as death in 79% of cases. Of the deaths, 95% involved bleeding at some point in the chain of events. The most common claims related to the cases were failure to perform the surgery or procedure safely (44%), failure to diagnose and treat in a timely manner (30%), and negligent hemodialysis treatment (11%). The most common complications cited were hemorrhage (62%), loss of function of limb (15%), and ischemia due to steal syndrome (11%). A total of 26 cases (39%) were found for the plaintiff or settled. The median award was US$463,000 with a mean of US$985,299 (SD = US$1,314,557). CONCLUSION: While popular opinion may indicate that steal syndrome is a commonly litigated complication, our data reveal that the most common injury litigated is death which may frequently be the result of a hemorrhagic episode. In addition to hemorrhage, the remaining most common complications included steal syndrome and loss of limb function. Therefore, steps to better prevent, diagnose and treat bleeding, nerve injury, and steal syndrome in a timely manner are critical to preventing hemodialysis-access-associated litigation.