Advanced upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is indistinguishable from renal infection by imaging: A case report.

RATIONALE: The current diagnostic approach for urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) relies on symptoms and imaging. Nevertheless, the diagnosis can be challenging in advanced cases presenting with atypical imaging and symptoms. This article presents an unreported case with atypical imaging and symptoms to provide some experience in diagnosing advanced UTUC. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 55-year-old male patient was admitted to the hospital with a 2-month history of persistent left scrotal pain and intermittent left lower back pain. DIAGNOSES: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a left kidney infection. Paradoxically, the patient did not present with a fever, and the white blood cell count was within normal limits. To further clarify the diagnosis, urine cytology was performed. Surprisingly, malignant tumor cells were discovered. The diagnosis of UTUC was considered. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent radical tumor resection. OUTCOMES: The surgery was successfully performed. The patient received regular chemotherapy after surgery. No recurrence was found during the follow-up. LESSONS: This case is a rare and enlightening clinical scenario. When imaging reveals renal infection accompanied by varicocele or renal vein embolism, it is crucial to consider the possibility of advanced UTUC.

Canine primary ureteral leiomyosarcoma treated with unilateral left ureteronephrectomy.

Background: Primary ureteral neoplasms are extremely rare in dogs, and ureteral involvement usually occurs owing to the invasion of renal and bladder tumors. Case Description: This case report describes a 12-year-old intact male mixed-breed dog referred to a private clinic with a six-month history of abdominal distention. A physical examination revealed mild abdominal pain. Hematological tests detected normocytic-normochromic anemia (hematocrit 33.6% [reference interval-RI: 37%-55%], red blood cells 4.93 M/µl [RI: 5.5-8.5 M/µl], and hemoglobin 12.4 g/dl [RI: 12-18.0 g/dl]). The results from the leukogram, thrombogram, renal, and hepatic panels were within the reference intervals for dogs. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed a cavitary mass measuring approximately 12 cm in diameter as the largest tumor in the left abdominal region over the left hepatic lobe or mesenteric site. Chest radiography did not reveal any metastasis. Therefore, the patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, during which the left ureter was found to be affected by a 12-cm mass that adhered to the left kidney. A unilateral left ureteronephrectomy was performed, and histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) confirmed well-differentiated primary ureteral leiomyosarcoma. The patient survived for 130 days but died of lung metastasis. Conclusion: Ureteral leiomyosarcoma should be investigated and included in the list of differential diagnoses for primary ureteral neoplasms. Regardless of the therapeutic modality, the prognosis of ureteral leiomyosarcoma may be unfavorable, as shown in this report.

Diagnostic performance of photodynamic diagnosis with oral 5-aminolevulinic acid for upper tract- and bladder urothelial carcinoma: a single-centre, retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) enhanced with oral 5-aminolaevulinic acid between the suspected upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC) cases. METHODS: This retrospective study included 18 patients with suspected UTUC who underwent ureteroscopy (URS) with oral 5-ALA in the PDD-URS cohort between June 2018 and January 2019; and 110 patients with suspected BUC who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) in the PDD-TURBT cohort between January 2019 and March 2023. Sixty-three and 708 biopsy samples were collected during diagnostic URS and TURBT, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of white light (WL) and PDD in the two cohorts was evaluated, and false PDD-positive samples were pathologically re-evaluated. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of PDD was significantly superior to that of WL in both cohorts. The per biopsy sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PDD in patients in the PDD-URS and PDD-TURBT cohorts were 91.2 vs. 71.4, 75.9 vs. 75.3, 81.6 vs. 66.3, and 88.0 vs. 79.4%, respectively. The PDD-URS cohort exhibited a higher AUC than did the PDD-TURBT cohort (0.84 vs. 0.73). Seven of four false PDD-positive samples (57.1%) in the PDD-URS cohort showed potential precancerous findings compared with eight of 101 (7.9%) in the PDD-TURBT cohort. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of PDD in the PDD-URS cohort was at least equivalent to that in the PDD-TURBT cohort.

Unmasking Ureteral Polyps: Insights From a Case Series.

Fibroepithelial polyps in the urinary tract are a rare cause of obstructive uropathy with fewer than 130 cases reported in the literature. In our series, we describe polyps that were missed on preoperative imaging and later found in the operating room during pyeloplasty. It is critical for urologists to be aware of polyps as a potential source of obstruction as they can increase the complexity of a reconstruction and, if missed, may result in a failed repair and persistent obstruction. We hypothesize that performing a retrograde pyelogram prior to ureteric reconstruction will facilitate diagnosis prior to surgical repair.

Decisional and prognostic impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multi-institutional collaborative analysis (ROBUUST collaborative group).

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) with or without biopsy remains a subject of contention in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with varying recommendations across different guidelines. The study aims to analyse the decision-making and prognostic role of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) in high-risk UTUC patients undergoing curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multi-institutional analysis of high-risk UTUC patients from the ROBUUST dataset, a comparison between patients who received or not preoperative URS and biopsy before curative surgery was carried out. Logistic regression analysis evaluated differences between patients receiving URS and its impact on treatment strategy. Survival analysis included 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). After adjusting for high-risk prognostic group features, Cox proportional hazard model estimated significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 1,912 patients were included, 1,035 with preoperative URS and biopsy and 877 without. Median follow-up: 24 months. Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy was the most common procedure (55.1%), in both subgroups. The 5-year OS (P = 0.04) and CSS (P < 0.001) were significantly higher for patients undergoing URS. The 5-year RFS (P = 0.6), and MFS (P = 0.3) were comparable between the 2 groups. Preoperative URS and biopsy were neither a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes nor of a specific treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS: The advantage in terms of OS and CSS in patients undergoing preoperative URS could derive from a better selection of candidates for curative treatment. The treatment strategy is likely more influenced by tumor features than by URS findings.

Unveiling the challenges of UTUC biopsies and cytology: insights from a global real-world practice study.

PURPOSE: Diagnostic ureteroscopy (dURS) is optional in the assessment of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and provides the possibility of obtaining histology. METHODS: To evaluate endoscopic biopsy techniques and outcomes, we assessed data from patients from the CROES-UTUC registry. The registry includes multicenter prospective collected data on diagnosis and management of patients suspected having UTUC. RESULTS: We assessed 2380 patients from 101 centers. dURS with biopsy was performed in 31.6% of patients. The quality of samples was sufficient for diagnosis in 83.5% of cases. There was no significant association between biopsy techniques and quality (p = 0.458). High-grade biopsy accurately predicted high-grade disease in 95.7% and high-risk stage disease in 86%. In ureteroscopic low-grade tumours, the prediction of subsequent low-grade disease was 66.9% and low-risk stage Ta-disease 35.8%. Ureteroscopic staging correctly predicted non-invasive Ta-disease and ≥ T1 disease in 48.9% and 47.9% of patients, respectively. Cytology outcomes did not provide additional value in predicting tumour grade. CONCLUSION: Biopsy results adequately predict high-grade and high-risk disease, but approximately one-third of patients are under-staged. Two-thirds of patients with low-grade URS-biopsy have high-risk stage disease, highlighting the need for improved diagnostics to better assess patient risk and guide treatment decisions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02281188; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02281188 ).

Prospective evaluation of the RT-PCR based urinary marker Bladder Epicheck® as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary tract tumor.

BACKGROUND: Upper-tract-urothelial-carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5-10% of all urothelial-neoplasms with increasing incidence in the last decades. Current standard tools for diagnosis of UTUC include cytology, computed tomography (CT) urography and ureterorenoscopy (URS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Bladder Epicheck® Test as diagnostic tool for UTUC diagnosis and recurrence. METHODS: Overall, 136 urine samples, selective collected from upper-urinary-tract before URS for suspicion of UTUC were analyzed with cytology and Bladder Epicheck® Test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of both markers were calculated and compared to URS and/or histology as reference. RESULTS: UTUC was detected in 40 cases (33.3%), among them 30 were classified as low-grade (LG) and 10 as high-grade (HG). Overall sensitivity of Bladder Epicheck® for UTUC detection was 65% compared to 42.5% for cytology, increasing to 100% for Bladder Epicheck® and 90% for cytology if considering only HG tumors. Overall specificity of Bladder Epicheck® was 81.2% and of cytology 93.7%. PPV and NPV were 63.4% and 82.2% for Bladder Epicheck® and 77.2% and 76.5% for cytology. Considering an EpiScore cut-off >75, instead of 60, specificity of Bladder Epicheck® improves to 89% and PPV to 74.2%. Limitations include the use of a marker validated only for bladder-cancer and the relatively small number of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its high sensitivity for HG tumors, the Bladder Epicheck® Test can be used in diagnosis and treatment decision-making of UTUC. Furthermore, it could be very useful in follow-up of UTUC, after endoscopic treatment to postpone or avoid unnecessary endoscopic exploration. Even if further studies are needed to validate these findings, Bladder Epicheck® could be a promising clinical tool for detection of UTUC.

Focused UTUC pathways with a risk-stratified approach to diagnostic ureteroscopy: is it the need of the hour? A retrospective cohort analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer is a rare, aggressive variant of urinary tract cancer. There is often delay to diagnosis and management for this entity in view of diagnostic and staging challenges needing additional investigations and risk stratifications for improved outcomes. In this article, we share our experience in developing a dedicated diagnostic and treatment pathway for UTUC and assess its impact on time lines to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We also evaluate the impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy (DUR) on UTUC care pathways timelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective database was maintained for all patients who underwent a RNU from January 2015 to August 2022 in a high-volume single tertiary care centre in the UK. In 2019, a Focused UTUC pathway (FUP) was implemented at the centre to streamline diagnostic and RNU pathways. A retrospective analysis of the database was conducted to compare time lines and diagnostic trends between the pre-FUP and FUP cohorts. Primary outcome measures were time to RNU from MDT. Secondary outcome measures were: impact of DUR on time to RNU from MDT and negative UTUC rates between DUR and non-DUR cohorts. Differences in continuous variables across categories were assessed using the independent sample t test. Categorical variables between cohorts were analysed using the chi-square (χ2). Statistical significance in this study was set as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 500 patients with complete data were included in the analysis. The pre-FUP and FUP cohorts consisted of 313 patients and 187 patients, respectively. The overall cohort had a mean age (SD) of 70 years (9.3). 66% of the overall cohort were males. The median time to RNU from MDT in the FUP was significantly lower compared to the pre-FUP cohort; 62 days (IQR 59) vs. 48 days (IQR 41.5), p < 0.0001. The median time to RNU from MDT in patients who underwent a diagnostic URS in the FUP cohort was significantly lower compared to the pre-FUP cohort; 78.5 days (IQR 54.8) vs. 68 days (IQR 48), p-NS. The non-UTUC rates in the DUR and non-DUR cohorts were 6/248 (2.4%) and 14/251 (5.6%), respectively (NS). CONCLUSION: In this series, we illustrate the effectiveness of integrating a multidisciplinary approach with specialised personnel, ring-fenced clinics, efficient diagnostic assessment and optimised theatre capacity. By adopting a risk-stratified approach to diagnostic ureteroscopy, we have achieved a significant reduction in time to RNU.

Multiple Fluorescences in Situ Hybridization Status in Excreted Urine Improve Diagnostic Efficacy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinomas.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of single and multiple fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) tests for upper urinary tract cancer (UTUC), we analyzed the diagnostic efficacy of FISH in patients with UTUC and the difference between it and the Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage and grade of the tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated for UTUC at our institution between 2011 and 2021 who had not been previously diagnosed with UTUC were included. Patients were divided into single, two, and multiple (three times or four times) FISH groups based on the number of FISH tests performed on different samples from the same patient, and the diagnostic efficiency of single, two, and multiple FISH tests for muscle-invasive tumors and highgrade tumors were assessed. RESULTS: We included a total of 207 patients with UTUC, and when compared to single FISH, the sensitivity of multiple and double FISH for the diagnosis of UTUC increased from 62% to 76% and 78%, respectively. It went from 67% to 78% and 80% for muscle-invasive UTUC (> = pT2) and from 71% to 79% and 81% for the highest- grade UTUC. CONCLUSION: Multiple FISH improves the diagnostic efficacy of UTUC and helps to differentiate aggressive tumors.

Positioning the role of urine cytology within the diagnostic pathway for UTUC: supportive but inconclusive.

PURPOSE: With the introduction of kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) for low-risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC), correct risk-stratification has become crucial. High-grade cytology is one of the decisive variables to stratify a tumor as high-risk. To position the role of urine cytology in the diagnostic pathway of UTUC patients, we evaluated the accuracy of urine cytology by comparing the outcomes with histopathology. METHOD: Patients with UTUC evaluated between 2010 and 2020, and diagnosed by imaging, cytology and histopathology were selected. Descriptive statistics were used to compare cytology with histopathological outcomes using crosstabs. Clinical performance characteristics of cytology were determined for the presence of a malignancy. RESULTS: This study included 176 patients with confirmed histopathological UTUC. Concordance between cytology and biopsy results was found in 14.8% of low-grade tumors and 16.8% of high-grade tumors. Comparing cytology with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) specimens revealed concordance rates of 1.6% for low-grade tumors and 22.9% for high-grade tumors. Notably, 51.1% of urine cytology results were false negative. Sensitivity for detecting high-grade and low-grade tumors with a positive urine cytology was 56.6% and 52.6%, respectively, with specificities of 54.8% and 37.2%. CONCLUSION: In the current study, cytology appears to exhibit limited reliability when used as a sole diagnostic tool for assessing tumor grade and consequently risk stratification. It is imperative to recognize these limitations, optimize urine sampling techniques, and leverage a combination of diverse diagnostic methods for the most effective and individualized treatment decision-making.

Prevalence and characteristics of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma having potential Lynch syndrome identified by immunohistochemical universal screening and Amsterdam criteria II.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) having potential Lynch syndrome (pLS) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of DNA mismatch repair gene-related proteins (MMRPs) and Amsterdam criteria II and explore their clinical characteristics. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 150 consecutive patients with UTUC who underwent surgical resection at our institution between February 2012 and December 2020, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) of four MMRPs (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) on all UTUC specimens was performed. Patients who tested positive for Amsterdam criteria (AMS) II and/or IHC screening were classified as having pLS and others as non-pLS, and their characteristics were explored. RESULTS: In this study, 5 (3%) and 6 (4%) patients were positive for AMS II and IHC screening, respectively. Two patient were positive for both AMS II and IHC screening, resulting in 9 (6%) patients with pLS. The pLS group was predominantly female (67% vs. 36%; p = 0.0093) and had more right-sided tumors (100% vs. 43%; p = 0.0009) than the non-pLS group. Of the 6 patients who were positive for IHC screening, 4 showed a combined loss of MSH2/MSH6 (n = 3) and MLH1/PMS2 (n = 1). Other two patients showed single loss of MSH6 and PSM2. CONCLUSIONS: AMS II and IHC screening identified pLS in 6% of patients with UTUC. The IHC screening-positive group tends to have relatively high rate of combined loss, but some patients have single loss. AMS II may overlook patients with LS, and a universal screening may be required for patients with UTUC as well as those with colorectal and endometrial cancer.

Impact of diagnostic ureteral catheterization on intravesical tumour recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether even a minimally invasive diagnostic procedure for the upper tract such as ureteral catheterization (UCath) may substantially increase the risk of intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS: The present, retrospective study enrolled 163 patients undergoing RNU for UTUC between 2010 and 2021 at two, tertiary care hospitals. The primary endpoint was the association between UCath and IVR-free survival (IVRFS). The secondary endpoints were the association of ureterorenoscopy (URS) and URS biopsy (URSBx) with IVRFS. Directed acyclic graph (DAG)-guided multivariable models were used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 163 patients, 128 (79%), 88 (54%), and 67 (41%) received UCath, URS, and URSBx, respectively. URS was performed concurrently with UCath. During the follow-up period (median: 47 months), IVR developed in 62 patients (5-year IVRFS rate: 52%). A DAG included concurrent bladder cancer, tumour size, hydronephrosis, positive cytology, and multiple UTUCs as potential confounders of the association between UCath and IVR. Both DAG-guided and stepwise multivariable models revealed a significant association between UCath and IVR (hazard ratio: 17.8; P < 0.001). UCath was also associated with shorter IVRFS in a subset of 75 patients who had not received URS (P < 0.001). In contrast, URS and URSBx were not associated with IVR in patients who had received UCath and URS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Any diagnostic manipulations of the upper urinary tract, even a minimally invasive procedure like UCath, could confer a risk of post-RNU IVR in UTUC patients.

Diagnosis and Management of Non-Metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: AUA/SUO Guideline.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this guideline is to provide a useful reference on the effective evidence-based diagnoses and management of non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MATERIALS/METHODS: The Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center of Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) team conducted searches in Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to March 3rd, 2022), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through January 2022), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through January 2022). The searches were updated August 2022. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (Table 1).[Table: see text]Results:This Guideline provides updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding diagnosis and management of non-metastatic UTUC including risk stratification, surveillance and survivorship. Treatments discussed include kidney sparing management, surgical management, lymph node dissection (LND), neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: This standardized guideline seeks to improve clinicians' ability to evaluate and treat patients with UTUC based on available evidence. Future studies will be essential to further support these statements for improving patient care. Updates will occur as the knowledge regarding disease biology, clinical behavior and new therapeutic options develop.

Chondrosarcoma of Ureter in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report.

Chondrosarcoma is a rare type of cancer that can affect the upper urinary tract. Because of its rarity, the clinical presentation of chondrosarcoma can be similar to other urinary tract conditions, such as renal colic, hematuria, and urothelial carcinoma. The primary treatment for chondrosarcoma is the surgical removal of the tumor, and radiation or chemotherapy may be used for advanced cases. However, because of the limited number of patients with this condition, there are no established guidelines for chemotherapy, and the outcomes are unclear. In this case, we present a 71-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with ureteral chondrosarcoma. She presented with abdominal pain and hydronephrosis, and a tumor was found beneath a small stone. The patient underwent nephroureterectomy and received oral fluorouracil chemotherapy due to the advanced stage of the disease. Fortunately, the patient survived, and at the 7 months post-operative follow-up there was no evidence of recurrence. In conclusion, the chondrosarcoma of the upper urinary tract is a rare condition that can be difficult to diagnose due to its similarity to other urinary tract conditions. Treatment typically involves the surgical removal of the tumor, with radiation or chemotherapy reserved for advanced cases. However, because of the limited number of patients, there are no established guidelines for chemotherapy, and the outcomes of treatment are unclear.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update.

CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has updated the guidelines to aid clinicians in evidence-based management of UTUC. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The recommendations provided in these guidelines are based on a review of the literature via a systematic search of the PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Data were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, (neo)adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, metastatic, immunotherapy, and survival. The results were assessed by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Even though data are accruing, for many areas there is still insufficient high-level evidence to provide strong recommendations. Patient stratification on the basis of histology and clinical examination (including imaging) and assessment of patients at risk of Lynch syndrome will aid management. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk UTUC and two functional kidneys. In particular, for patients with high-risk or metastatic UTUC, new treatment options have become available. In high-risk UTUC, platinum-based chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy, and adjuvant nivolumab for unfit or patients who decline chemotherapy, are options. For metastatic disease, gemcitabine/carboplatin chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Patients with PD-1/PD-L1-positive tumours should be offered a checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab). CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen according to the risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY: Cancer of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, timely and appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.

Diagnostic value of Xpert® BC Detection, Bladder Epicheck®, Urovysion® FISH and cytology in the detection of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Following the current guidelines, diagnosis and staging for upper urinary tract tumours (UTUC) can be performed with Computed Tomography, urography, ureterorenoscopy (URS) and selective cytology. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the Xpert®-BC-Detection and the Bladder-Epicheck®-test in the detection of UTUC and compare it with cytology and the Urovysion®-FISH test using histology and URS as gold standard. METHODS: A total of 97 analyses were collected through selective catheterization of the ureter before URS to test for cytology, Xpert®-BC-Detection, Bladder-Epicheck® and Urovysion®-FISH. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated using histology results/URS as reference. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity was 100% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 41.9% for cytology, 64.5% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 87.1% for Urovysion®-FISH. The sensitivity of Xpert®-BC-Detection was 100% in both, LG and HG tumours, sensitivity of cytology increased from 30.8% in LG to 100% in HG, for Bladder-Epicheck® from 57.7% in LG to 100% in HG and of Urovysion®-FISH from 84.6% in LG to 100% in HG tumours. Specificity was 4.5% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 93.9% for cytology, 78.8% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 81.8% for Urovysion®-FISH. PPV was 33% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 76.5% for cytology, 58.8% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 69.2% for Urovysion®FISH. NPV was 100% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 77.5% for cytology, 82.5% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 93.1% for Urovysion®FISH. CONCLUSION: Bladder-Epicheck® and Urovysion®FISH along with cytology could be a helpful ancillary method in the diagnosis and follow-up of UTUC while due to its low specificity Xpert®-BC Detection seems to be of limited usefulness.

Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the number of undergoing radical nephroureterectomy and postoperative adjuvant systematic therapy for upper tract urothelial carcinomas in Japan: A multicenter retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has affected cancer management worldwide. For upper tract urothelial carcinomas, delays in treatments are not recommended even during the pandemic. We investigated the impact of the pandemic on patients with these carcinomas who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and adjuvant systematic therapy before and after COVID-19 spread in Japan. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 304 patients who underwent RNU for upper tract urothelial carcinomas between May 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, in Aichi, Japan. The patients were categorized into three groups based on whether they underwent surgery in the prepandemic (before infection spread in Japan), early pandemic (between confirmation of the first case and vaccination initiation), and late pandemic (after the start of vaccination in Japan) phases. The patient characteristics, diagnostic methods, pathological findings, and postoperative therapy were compared among the three phases. RESULTS: Overall, 74, 152, and 78 patients underwent RNU in the prepandemic, early pandemic, and late pandemic phases, respectively. The number of patients who underwent preoperative ureteroscopy decreased significantly from the prepandemic phase to the late pandemic phase due to pandemic-related restrictions (p = 0.016). There was no difference in the time to the first visit or pathological findings. Among patients classified as high-risk according to existing clinical trials, the proportion receiving adjuvant systematic therapy after RNU decreased significantly from 52.3% to 19% (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the pathological findings. The number of patients receiving appropriate adjuvant systematic therapy decreased during the pandemic.