Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 11.341
Filtrar
1.
Acta Oncol ; 63: 343-350, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751329

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whether sex is an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer survival is the subject of ongoing debate. Both large national registries and single hospital studies have shown conflicting findings. In this study, we explore the impact of sex on lung-cancer-specific survival in an unselected population that is well-characterized with respect to stage and other covariates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with lung cancer at a single hospital serving a whole and defined region in Southern Norway during the 10 years 2007-2016 were included. Follow-up data were available for at least 56 months for all patients. Analyses were adjusted for stage, treatment, performance status, smoking, age, histology, epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase/immunotherapy treatment and period. Differences in lung-cancer-specific survival by sex were explored using restricted mean survival times (RMST). RESULTS: Of the 1,261 patients diagnosed with lung cancer, 596 (47%) were females and 665 (53%) males, with mean ages of 68.5 and 69.5 years, respectively. The observed 5-year lung-cancer-specific survival rate was 27.4% (95% CI 23.7, 31.2) in females and 21.4% (95% CI 18.2, 24.8) in males. However, after adjustment for covariates, no significant differences by sex were observed. The 5-year RMST was 0.9 months shorter (95% CI -2.1, 0.31, p = 0.26) in males compared to females. INTERPRETATION: In this cohort, sex was not associated with a difference in lung-cancer-specific survival after adjusting for clinical and biological factors. Imbalance in stage at diagnosis was the main contributor to the observed difference in lung-cancer-specific survival by sex.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Anciano , Noruega/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores Sexuales , Pronóstico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología
2.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 83: 290-295, 2024 May 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742966

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate traumatic dental injuries (TDIs) among children who for 1 year attended a Norwegian public after-hours emergency public dental (EPD) clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 7-18-year-olds (n = 312) who presented at the EPD clinic, underwent a clinical dental examination, and consented to the disclosure of clinical information. Recording of TDIs was restricted to anterior permanent teeth. Potential TDI predictors were also analysed. RESULTS: Almost half (n = 148) of the children were assessed with TDIs in permanent teeth, showing a mean age of 11.0 (standard deviation [SD]: 3.5) years. Males constituted 54.7%. The children experienced TDIs often outside school hours (43.9%), and the majority (58.1%) were caused by falls/accidents. Sixty of them experienced only one TDI. The most common location was the maxillary central incisors. Assessment of TDIs according to severity, could only be done in 131 individuals, involving 253 TDIs. Of these, 81.8% were mild. The odds of visiting the emergency clinic for a TDI were higher (odds ratio [OR] = 2.64, confidence interval [CI]: 1.61-4.31) among children with previous TDIs and lower (OR = 0.28, CI: 0.12-0.68) among those with poor dental attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic dental injuries were a common reason for seeking emergency care. Milder injuries dominated and involved mostly one maxillary central incisor. Previous episodes of TDIs and attendance patterns seemed to be associated with seeking care for TDIs.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Dientes , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiología , Niño , Traumatismos de los Dientes/terapia , Traumatismos de los Dientes/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Atención Posterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Clínicas Odontológicas/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 99(1): 363-375, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701153

RESUMEN

Background: A timely diagnosis of dementia can be beneficial for providing good support, treatment, and care, but the diagnostic rate remains unknown and is probably low. Objective: To determine the dementia diagnostic rate and to describe factors associated with diagnosed dementia. Methods: This registry linkage study linked information on research-based study diagnoses of all-cause dementia and subtypes of dementias, Alzheimer's disease, and related dementias, in 1,525 participants from a cross-sectional population-based study (HUNT4 70+) to dementia registry diagnoses in both primary-care and hospital registries. Factors associated with dementia were analyzed with multiple logistic regression. Results: Among those with research-based dementia study diagnoses in HUNT4 70+, 35.6% had a dementia registry diagnosis in the health registries. The diagnostic rate in registry diagnoses was 19.8% among home-dwellers and 66.0% among nursing home residents. Of those with a study diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, 35.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32.6-39.0) had a registry diagnosis; for those with a study diagnosis of vascular dementia, the rate was 25.8% (95% CI 19.2-33.3) and for Lewy body dementias and frontotemporal dementia, the diagnosis rate was 63.0% (95% CI 48.7-75.7) and 60.0% (95% CI 43.3-75.1), respectively. Factors associated with having a registry diagnosis included dementia in the family, not being in the youngest or oldest age group, higher education, more severe cognitive decline, and greater need for help with activities of daily living. Conclusions: Undiagnosed dementia is common, as only one-third of those with dementia are diagnosed. Diagnoses appear to be made at a late stage of dementia.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Atención Primaria de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/epidemiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Anciano , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prevalencia , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1296, 2024 May 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741074

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that socioeconomic status (SES) is a strong predictor of chronic disease. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no studies of how SES affects the risk of Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) that has not been based upon self-reporting or retrospectively screening of symptoms. As far as we know, this is therefore the first study that isolate and describe socioeconomic determinants of ME/CFS and calculate how these factors relate to the risk of ME/CFS diagnosis by utilizing individual level registry data. This allows for objective operationalization of the ME/CFS population, and makes it possible to model SES affect the risk of ME/CFS diagnosis, relative to control groups. DATA AND METHODS: We conduct a pooled cross-sectional analysis of registry data from all adult patients diagnosed with ME/CFS from 2016 to 2018 in Norway, coupled with socioeconomic data from statistics Norway from 2011 to 2018. We operationalize SES as household income and educational attainment fixed at the beginning of the study period. We compare the effects of SES on the risk of ME/CFS diagnosis to a population of chronically ill patients with hospital diagnoses that share clinical characteristics of ME/CFS and a healthy random sample of the Norwegian population. Our models are estimated by logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: When comparing the risk of ME/CFS diagnosis with a population consisting of people with four specific chronic diseases, we find that high educational attainment is associated with a 19% increase (OR: 1.19) in the risk of ME/CFS and that high household income is associated with a 17% decrease (OR:0.83) in risk of ME/CFS. In our second model we compare with a healthy population sample, and found that low educational attainment is associated with 69% decrease (OR:0.31) in the risk of ME/CFS and that low household income is associated with a 53% increase (OR: 1.53). CONCLUSION: We find statistically significant associations between SES and the risk of ME/CFS. However, our more detailed analyses shows that our findings vary according to which population we compare the ME/CFS patients with, and that the effect of SES is larger when comparing with a healthy population sample, as opposed to controls with selected hospital diagnoses.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/epidemiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Clase Social , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Adolescente
5.
Addict Sci Clin Pract ; 19(1): 37, 2024 May 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of co-occurring mental disorders (termed 'dual diagnosis') among patients receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is scarce. This study aimed (1) to estimate the prevalence and structure of dual diagnoses in two national cohorts of OAT patients and (2) to compare mental disorders between OAT patients and the general populations stratified on sex and standardized by age. METHODS: A registry-linkage study of OAT patients from Czechia (N = 4,280) and Norway (N = 11,389) during 2010-2019 was conducted. Data on mental disorders (F00-F99; ICD-10) recorded in nationwide health registers were linked to the individuals registered in OAT. Dual diagnoses were defined as any mental disorder excluding substance use disorders (SUDs, F10-F19; ICD-10). Sex-specific age-standardized morbidity ratios (SMR) were calculated for 2019 to compare OAT patients and the general populations. RESULTS: The prevalence of dual diagnosis was 57.3% for Czechia and 78.3% for Norway. In Czechia, anxiety (31.1%) and personality disorders (25.7%) were the most prevalent, whereas anxiety (33.8%) and depression (20.8%) were the most prevalent in Norway. Large country-specific variations were observed, e.g., in ADHD (0.5% in Czechia, 15.8% in Norway), implying differences in screening and diagnostic practices. The SMR estimates for any mental disorders were 3.1 (females) and 5.1 (males) in Czechia and 5.6 (females) and 8.2 (males) in Norway. OAT females had a significantly higher prevalence of co-occurring mental disorders, whereas SMRs were higher in OAT males. In addition to opioid use disorder (OUD), other substance use disorders (SUDs) were frequently recorded in both countries. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate an excess of mental health problems in OAT patients compared to the general population of the same sex and age in both countries, requiring appropriate clinical attention. Country-specific differences may stem from variations in diagnostics and care, reporting to registers, OAT provision, or substance use patterns.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Prevalencia , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/estadística & datos numéricos , República Checa/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de la Personalidad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Factores Sexuales
6.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303254, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709776

RESUMEN

One of the key tools to understand and reduce the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is testing. The total number of tests, the number of positive tests, the number of negative tests, and the positivity rate are interconnected indicators and vary with time. To better understand the relationship between these indicators, against the background of an evolving pandemic, the association between the number of positive tests and the number of negative tests is studied using a joint modeling approach. All countries in the European Union, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and Norway are included in the analysis. We propose a joint penalized spline model in which the penalized spline is reparameterized as a linear mixed model. The model allows for flexible trajectories by smoothing the country-specific deviations from the overall penalized spline and accounts for heteroscedasticity by allowing the autocorrelation parameters and residual variances to vary among countries. The association between the number of positive tests and the number of negative tests is derived from the joint distribution for the random intercepts and slopes. The correlation between the random intercepts and the correlation between the random slopes were both positive. This suggests that, when countries increase their testing capacity, both the number of positive tests and negative tests will increase. A significant correlation was found between the random intercepts, but the correlation between the random slopes was not significant due to a wide credible interval.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Noruega/epidemiología , Modelos Estadísticos , Suiza/epidemiología , Pandemias , Unión Europea
7.
Acta Oncol ; 63: 303-312, 2024 05 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716485

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stage at cancer diagnosis is an important predictor of cancer survival. TNM stage is constructed for anatomic solid cancer diagnoses from tumor size (T), nodal spread (N) and distant metastasis (M) and categorized in groups 0-I, II, II and IV. TNM stage is imperative in cancer diagnosis, management and control, and of high value in cancer surveillance, for example, monitoring of stage distributions. This study yields an overview of TNM availability and trends in stage distribution in the Nordic countries for future use in monitoring and epidemiologic studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: TNM information was acquired from the cancer registries in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Iceland during 2004-2016 for 26 cancer sites in the three former countries and four in Iceland. We studied availability, comparability, and distribution of TNM stage in three periods: 2004-2008, 2009-2013, and 2014-2016, applying a previously validated algorithm of 'N0M0 for NXMX'. For cancers of colon, rectum, lung, breast, and kidney, we examined TNM stage-specific 1-year relative survival to evaluate the quality in registration of TNM between countries. RESULTS: Denmark, Sweden, and Iceland exhibited available TNM stage proportions of 75-95% while proportions were lower in Norway. Proportions increased in Sweden over time but decreased in Denmark. One-year relative survival differed substantially more between TNM stages than between countries emphasizing that TNM stage is an important predictor for survival and that stage recording is performed similarly in the Nordic countries. INTERPRETATION: Assessment and registration of TNM stage is an imperative tool in evaluations of trends in cancer survival between the Nordic countries.


Asunto(s)
Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos/epidemiología , Femenino , Noruega/epidemiología , Masculino , Suecia/epidemiología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Islandia/epidemiología
8.
Euro Surveill ; 29(20)2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757285

RESUMEN

At the end of 2022 and most notably during the first half of 2023, the number of invasive group A streptococcus (iGAS) notifications increased in Norway, largely affecting children younger than 10 years, as observed in several other countries. Following this atypical season, a new surge in the number of iGAS notifications began in December 2023 and peaked between January and February 2024, now particularly affecting both children younger than 10 years and older adults (70 years and above).


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Streptococcus pyogenes , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Streptococcus pyogenes/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Preescolar , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Incidencia , Estaciones del Año , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Lactante , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Adulto Joven , Notificación de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población
9.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1354385, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694943

RESUMEN

Background and aims: Diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFU) are a persistent healthcare challenge, impacting both patients and healthcare systems, with adverse effects on quality of life and productivity. Our primary aim was to examine the trends in lifetime prevalence of DFU, as well as other micro- and macrovascular complications in the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) in Norway. Methods: This study consists of individuals ≥20 years with diabetes participating in the population-based cross-sectional HUNT surveys (1995-2019). Prevalence ratios, comparing the lifetime prevalence of DFU and other relevant micro- and macrovascular complications between the HUNT surveys, were calculated using Poisson regression. Results: The lifetime prevalence (95% confidence interval (CI)) of a DFU requiring three or more weeks to heal was 11.0% (9.5-12.7) in HUNT2, 7.5% (6.3-8.8) in HUNT3 and 5.3% (4.4-6.3) in HUNT4. The decrease in DFU prevalence from 1995 to 2019 was observed in both men and women, for all age groups, and for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The highest lifetime prevalence of DFU was found among those with type 1 diabetes. The decrease in HbA1c from HUNT2 to HUNT4 did not differ between those with and without a DFU. The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (eGFR categories G3-G5)) increased in both individuals with and without a DFU. Conclusion: Results from the HUNT surveys show a substantial decline in the lifetime prevalence of DFU from 1995 to 2019.


Asunto(s)
Pie Diabético , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Pie Diabético/epidemiología , Anciano , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones
10.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e081399, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749693

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the shape of the causal relationship between body mass index (BMI) and mortality risk in a Mendelian randomisation framework. DESIGN: Mendelian randomisation analyses of two prospective population-based cohorts. SETTING: Individuals of European ancestries living in Norway or the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 56 150 participants from the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) in Norway and 366 385 participants from UK Biobank recruited by postal invitation. OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality (cardiovascular, cancer, non-cardiovascular non-cancer). RESULTS: A previously published non-linear Mendelian randomisation analysis of these data using the residual stratification method suggested a J-shaped association between genetically predicted BMI and mortality outcomes with the lowest mortality risk at a BMI of around 25 kg/m2. However, the 'constant genetic effect' assumption required by this method is violated. The reanalysis of these data using the more reliable doubly-ranked stratification method provided some indication of a J-shaped relationship, but with much less certainty as there was less precision in estimates at the lower end of the BMI distribution. Evidence for a harmful effect of reducing BMI at low BMI levels was only present in some analyses, and where present, only below 20 kg/m2. A harmful effect of increasing BMI for all-cause mortality was evident above 25 kg/m2, for cardiovascular mortality above 24 kg/m2, for cancer mortality above 30 kg/m2 and for non-cardiovascular non-cancer mortality above 26 kg/m2. In UK Biobank, the association between genetically predicted BMI and mortality at high BMI levels was stronger in women than in men. CONCLUSION: This research challenges findings from previous conventional observational epidemiology and Mendelian randomisation investigations that the lowest level of mortality risk is at a BMI level of around 25 kg/m2. Our results provide some evidence that reductions in BMI will increase mortality risk for a small proportion of the population, and clear evidence that increases in BMI will increase mortality risk for those with BMI above 25 kg/m2.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Humanos , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Noruega/epidemiología , Bancos de Muestras Biológicas , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/genética , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/genética , Adulto , Causas de Muerte , Mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Biobanco del Reino Unido
11.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1330, 2024 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755615

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mental health problems, and major depression in particular, are important public health issues. Following trends in the prevalence of major depression is difficult because of the costs and complications of diagnostic interviews and general population self-report health surveys. Scandinavian countries, however, have several central, population-based health registries. We aimed to investigate how well these registries capture the epidemiology of major depression in the population. METHODS: In two Norwegian regional surveys of general population health, each repeated after 10 years, responders were asked to report depressive symptoms using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL) or the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Data were linked to three central health registries capturing contact with primary care, specialist care and prescriptions for antidepressants, to investigate how well these registries reflected self-reported depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Most responders scored low on Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), but 10% and 13%, respectively, scored above cut-off, with only minor changes between the two survey times. Females scored higher than males. Older people scored lower than younger, and a social gradient was visible. Around 12% of those who scored above the cut-off on either scale were recorded in the central health registries during the following year. This correlation was highest in primary care data, followed by prescription data and lowest in specialist care. Females were more often recorded in registries (p < 0.001), as were younger people (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong association between scores on screening for major depression in the general population surveys and being recorded in central health registries. There was a low sensitivity of these registries. and there was some variation in how sensitive the central health registries were in picking up depression, especially for males and older people. However, the stability of the measures over time suggests we may get an impression of the prevalence of major depression in the general population by using data from the central health registries. A combination of primary care data, prescription data and specialist care data have a higher sensitivity.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Noruega/epidemiología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Anciano , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Prevalencia
12.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 366, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750535

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of over-the-counter analgesics (OTCA) is common among adolescents and has been linked with increased symptoms of anxiety and depression. However, little is known about which specific symptoms are most strongly connected to OTCA usage. The current study assessed which anxiety and depression symptoms were most closely associated with OTCA usage in a large sample of adolescents and examined whether this differed across genders. METHOD: The present study was based on data from 626,581 participants from the Ungdata survey in Norway. Associations between OTCA and anxiety and depression symptoms were examined using network analysis. Non-regularized partial-correlation networks were constructed to estimate the conditional dependent relations between the use of OTCA and symptoms while controlling for pain. Gender-specific networks were created for comparison. RESULTS: OTCA usage was associated with most symptoms, even after controlling for pain, with the strongest associations with "sleep problems", "stiff or tense", "everything is a struggle" and "suddenly scared". There were some gender differences, showing that "sleep problems" and "hopeless" were more strongly related to OTCA usage in females, whereas "stiff or tense" was more strongly related to OTCA usage in males. CONCLUSION: Overall, the somatic symptoms of anxiety and depression displayed the strongest associations with OTCA usage. When examining the gender-specific networks, both showed similar trends, although males exhibited slightly stronger associations between OTCA usage and somatic symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos , Ansiedad , Depresión , Medicamentos sin Prescripción , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Depresión/epidemiología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
Scand J Med Sci Sports ; 34(5): e14644, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760915

RESUMEN

Overuse injuries, which have a high prevalence in sport, are suggested to result in different affective responses in comparison to traumatic injuries. Affects may also reciprocally act as risk factors for overuse injury. The aim of this study was to examine the associations between overuse injury and affects within a longitudinal follow-up design. Competitive athletes (N = 149) of various sports and levels of competition completed the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre Overuse injury questionnaire (OSTRC-O) once a week over 10 consecutive weeks. Bivariate unconditional latent curve model analyses with structured residuals were performed to evaluate the associations within and across weeks between OSTRC-O severity score and affects. Results indicated that OSTRC-O severity score and positive affects (PA) had a statistically significant negative within-week relation (r = -24.51, 95% CI = [-33.9, -15.1], p < 0.001). Higher scores of overuse injury were significantly related to lower levels of PA across weeks (ß = -0.02, 95% CI = [-0.04, -0.001], p = 0.044), while the reciprocal effect of PA on overuse injury was not significant (ß = -0.13, 95% CI = [-0.52, 0.26], p = 0.51). No statistically significant association was observed between OSTRC-O severity score and negative affects, neither within nor across weeks. Our findings suggest that overuse injury may have adverse psychological consequences on the long run through lessened PA and address the need for providing sustainable psychological support focusing upon such PA when working with athletes experiencing overuse injury.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados , Humanos , Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Traumatismos en Atletas/psicología , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Afecto , Factores de Riesgo , Adolescente , Conducta Competitiva/fisiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Atletas/psicología
15.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 79(5): 1109-1117, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635298

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite a lack of conclusive evidence of effect, methenamine hippurate is widely prescribed as preventive treatment for recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) in Norway. A national discontinuation of methenamine hippurate treatment due to a 4-month drug shortage in 2019 presented an opportunity to evaluate its preventive effect on UTIs among regular users. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of the methenamine hippurate drug shortage on prescription frequency of UTI antibiotics. METHODS: Data from The Norwegian Prescription Database was analysed using an interrupted time series design. The time series consisted of 56 time periods of 14 days. The model included two naturally occurring interruptions: (i) the methenamine hippurate drug shortage, and (ii) reintroduction of the drug. The study population were 18 345 women ≥50 years receiving ≥2 prescriptions of methenamine hippurate in the study period before the shortage. Main outcome measure was number of prescriptions of UTI antibiotics per 1000 methenamine hippurate users. Prescription rates of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections were analysed to assess external events affecting antibiotic prescribing patterns. RESULTS: We found a significant increase of 2.41 prescriptions per 1000 methenamine hippurate users per 14-day period during the drug shortage (95%CI 1.39, 3.43, P < 0.001), followed by a significant reduction of -2.64 prescriptions after reintroduction (95%CI -3.66, -1.63, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During the methenamine hippurate drug shortage, we found a significant increase in prescribing trend for UTI antibiotics followed by a significant decrease in prescribing trend after reintroduction. This change in trend seems to reflect a preventive effect of the drug on recurrent UTIs.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Hipuratos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Metenamina , Metenamina/análogos & derivados , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Noruega/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hipuratos/uso terapéutico , Metenamina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
Addict Behav ; 155: 108041, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652974

RESUMEN

Negative life events (NLE) have been associated with increased alcohol use (AU) during adolescence. However, whether this risk association may be modified by leisure activities such as sports participation (SP) remains poorly understood. This study examined whether accumulated family-specific NLE in particular were associated with greater AU, and if so, whether SP moderated this association to reduce AU among high-NLE adolescents. We examined five annual assessments from a nationwide cohort of 3,422 Norwegian adolescents (13-15 year-olds; 55.3 % girls at baseline) who participated in the MyLife study. At each assessment, adolescents reported their AU on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Concise (AUDIT-C), the number of family-specific NLE in the past 12 months, SP days in the past 30 days, and multiple sociodemographic and individual-level characteristics (covariates). Changes over time in AU as a function of NLE, SP, and their interaction (NLExSP) were examined with a set of partially nested growth curve models. AU increased non-linearly over time in all models. The fully adjusted best-fitting model showed significant NLExSP interactions (estimate = -0.013, 95% CI [-0.02, -0.006]), such that the initial AUDIT-C scores were lower for high-NLE adolescents with high SP and greater for high-NLE adolescents with low SP. Further, linear increases in AU over time were marginally steeper for high-NLE adolescents with high SP (NLExSPxTime estimate = 0.034, 95% CI [-0.0002, 0.007]). Thus, SP appeared to have a protective role in reducing AU for high-NLE youth primarily during middle school years. Prevention efforts thus may utilize organized sports for youth facing family-specific NLE as a resource early on.


Asunto(s)
Deportes , Consumo de Alcohol en Menores , Humanos , Adolescente , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Longitudinales , Noruega/epidemiología , Deportes/estadística & datos numéricos , Consumo de Alcohol en Menores/estadística & datos numéricos , Consumo de Alcohol en Menores/psicología , Acontecimientos que Cambian la Vida , Familia , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta del Adolescente/psicología
17.
BMJ ; 385: e078225, 2024 04 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683947

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether use of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists is associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer. DESIGN: Scandinavian cohort study. SETTING: Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, 2007-21. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who started GLP1 receptor agonist treatment were compared with patients who started dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor treatment, and in an additional analysis, patients who started sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thyroid cancer identified from nationwide cancer registers. An active-comparator new user study design was used to minimise risks of confounding and time related biases from using real world studies of drug effects. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios, controlling for potential confounders with propensity score weighting. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 3.9 years (standard deviation 3.5 years) in the GLP1 receptor agonist group and 5.4 years (standard deviation 3.5 years) in the DPP4 inhibitor group. 76 of 145 410 patients (incidence rate 1.33 events per 10 000 person years) treated with GLP1 receptor agonists and 184 of 291 667 patients (incidence rate 1.46 events per 10 000 person years) treated with DPP4 inhibitors developed thyroid cancer. GLP1 receptor agonist use was not associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.31; rate difference -0.13, 95% confidence interval -0.61 to 0.36 events per 10 000 person years). The hazard ratio for medullary thyroid cancer was 1.19 (0.37 to 3.86). In the additional analysis comparing the GLP1 receptor agonist group with the SGLT2 inhibitor group, the hazard ratio for thyroid cancer was 1.16 (0.65 to 2.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort study using nationwide data from three countries, GLP1 receptor agonist use was not associated with a substantially increased risk of thyroid cancer over a mean follow-up of 3.9 years. In the main analysis comparing GLP1 receptor agonists with DPP4 inhibitors, the upper limit of the confidence interval was consistent with no more than a 31% increase in relative risk.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/inducido químicamente , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistas , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Incidencia , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Adulto , Suecia/epidemiología , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
18.
Accid Anal Prev ; 202: 107587, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636291

RESUMEN

This paper describes changes in the risk of road traffic injury in Norway during the period from 1970 to 2022. During this period, the risk of fatal and personal injury declined by more than 70 % for most groups of road users. There are five main potential explanations of a decline in the risk of injury: (1) a reduced probability of accidents that have the potential for causing injury; (2) an improved protection against injury given that an accident has occurred; (3) improved medical care increasing the survival rate, given an injury (this would reduce the number of fatalities, but not the number of injuries); (4) a tendency for the reporting of injuries in official accident statistics to decline over time; (5) uncertain or erroneous estimates of the exposure to the risk of injury. The decline in the risk of road traffic injuries in Norway after 1970 can probably be attributed to a combination of reduced reporting of injuries in official statistics, improved protection against injury in accidents, and (for fatal injuries) improved medical care. Insurance data, available from 1992, do not indicate a reduction in the risk of accidents leading to insurance claims. Incomplete and possibly erroneous data for mopeds and motorcycles make it impossible to identify sources of changes in injury risk over time for these modes of transport.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito , Heridas y Lesiones , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes de Tránsito/mortalidad , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niño , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Preescolar , Riesgo , Motocicletas/estadística & datos numéricos , Lactante
19.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e080611, 2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688673

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine associations between educational level, serving as an indicator of socioeconomic position, and prevalence of WHO-established leading behavioural and biological risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), in middle-aged to older women and men. DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: All inhabitants of the municipality of Tromsø, Norway, aged ≥40 years, were invited to the seventh survey (2015-2016) of the Tromsø Study; an ongoing population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 32 591 invited; 65% attended, and a total of 21 069 women (53%) and men aged 40-99 years were included in our study. OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed associations between educational level and NCD behavioural and biological risk factors: daily smoking, physical inactivity (sedentary in leisure time), insufficient fruit/vegetable intake (<5 units/day), harmful alcohol use (>10 g/day in women, >20 g/day in men), hypertension, obesity, intermediate hyperglycaemia and hypercholesterolaemia. These were expressed as odds ratios (OR) per unit decrease in educational level, with 95% CIs, in women and men. RESULTS: In women (results were not significantly different in men), we observed statistically significant associations between lower educational levels and higher odds of daily smoking (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.60 to 1.78), physical inactivity (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.31 to 1.46), insufficient fruit/vegetable intake (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.66), hypertension (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.30), obesity (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.29), intermediate hyperglycaemia (OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.19), and hypercholesterolaemia (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.12), and lower odds of harmful alcohol use (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.78). CONCLUSION: We found statistically significant educational gradients in women and men for all WHO-established leading NCD risk factors within a Nordic middle-aged to older general population. The prevalence of all risk factors increased at lower educational levels, except for harmful alcohol use, which increased at higher educational levels.


Asunto(s)
Escolaridad , Enfermedades no Transmisibles , Conducta Sedentaria , Fumar , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Prevalencia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fumar/epidemiología , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/epidemiología , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipercolesterolemia/epidemiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Hiperglucemia/epidemiología
20.
Int J Infect Dis ; 143: 107019, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582145

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the microbial aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults admitted to a tertiary care hospital and assess the impact of syndromic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels on pathogen detection. METHODS: Conducted at Haukeland University Hospital, Norway, from September 2020 to April 2023, this prospective study enrolled adults with suspected CAP. We analysed lower respiratory tract samples using both standard-of-care tests and the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Plus Panel (FAP plus). The added value of FAP Plus in enhancing the detection of clinically relevant pathogens, alongside standard-of-care diagnostics, was assessed. RESULTS: Of the 3238 patients screened, 640 met the inclusion criteria, with 384 confirmed to have CAP at discharge. In these patients, pathogens with proven or probable clinical significance were identified in 312 (81.3%) patients. Haemophilus influenzae was the most prevalent pathogen, found in 118 patients (30.7%), followed by SARS-CoV-2 in 74 (19.3%), and Streptococcus pneumoniae in 64 (16.7%). Respiratory viruses were detected in 186 (48.4%) patients. The use of FAP plus improved the pathogen detection rate from 62.8% with standard-of-care methods to 81.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Pathogens were identified in 81% of CAP patients, with Haemophilus influenzae and respiratory viruses being the most frequently detected pathogens. The addition of the FAP plus panel, markedly improved pathogen detection rates compared to standard-of-care diagnostics alone.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Humanos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Noruega/epidemiología , Hospitalización , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Neumonía/microbiología , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genética , Haemophilus influenzae/aislamiento & purificación , Haemophilus influenzae/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA