Need for formalized robotic training and curriculum in obstetrics and gynecology residency: an examination of current resident outlooks and perspectives.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate current robotic surgery training methodologies for ACGME-accredited obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency programs, better understand current resident perspectives, and explore potential areas for improvement within resident education. A cross-sectional study was done of ACGME-accredited OB/GYN residents in the 2023-2024 academic year. The study was done on a national setting via web-based survey. 75 surveys were included. The study was conducted via a 33-question survey study using a mixture of multiple choice, multiple answer, and Likert scale questions. Participants noted that 98.7% of their institutions perform robotic surgery and 90.7% have access to robotic console trainers. Outside of the operating room, slightly more than half of participants (57.3%) have formalized robotics training curriculums. A variety of training modalities were noted to be utilized by residents with the most helpful being hands-on training (67.7%) followed by dual-assist console (45.6%). The least helpful was noted to be online modules (58.7%). Most residents either strongly agree (45.3%) or agree (36.0%) that standardized robotics curriculums should be implemented for all OB/GYN residency programs. The largest barriers to completion of this training were noted to be attending comfort with resident participation in the case (74.0%), personal time (58.9%), and availability or access to trainers (42.5%). A formalized and standardized robotic training curriculum should be considered for OB/GYN residents with a multi-modal model utilizing a combination of training modalities as well as dedicated didactic hours.

Investigating racial/ethnic differences in procedure experience in obstetrics & gynecology trainees at a single academic institution: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Discrimination is common in medical education. Resident physicians of races and ethnicities underrepresented in medicine experience daily discrimination which has been proven to negatively impact training. There is limited data on the impact of resident race/ethnicity on OB/GYN surgical training. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of race/ethnicity on procedural experience in OB/GYN training. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of graduated OB/GYN resident case logs from 2009 to 2019 was performed at a single urban academic institution. Self-reported race/ethnicity data was collected. Association between URM and non-URM were analyzed using t-tests. Trainees were categorized by self-reported race/ethnicity into underrepresented in medicine (URM) (Black, Hispanic, Native American) and non-URM (White, Asian). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 84 residents: 19% URM (N = 16) and 79% non-URM (n = 66). Difference between URM and non-URM status and average case volume was analyzed using t-tests. There was no difference between non-URM and URM trainees and reported mean number of Total GYN (349 vs. 334, p = 0.31) and Total OB (624 vs. 597, P = 0.11) case logs. However, compared with non-URM, on average URM performed fewer Total procedures (1562 vs. 1469, P = 0.04). Analyzing individual procedures showed a difference in average number of abortions performed between URM and non-URM (76 vs. 53, P = 0.02). There were no other statistically significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This single institution study highlights potential differences in trainee experience by race/ethnicity. Larger national studies are warranted to further explore these differences to identify bias and discrimination, and to ensure equitable experience for all trainees.

Social media trends in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs on Instagram and X (Twitter).

BACKGROUND: During the COVID pandemic, residency program's social media presence increased to aid in residency recruitment by attempting to increase engagement and readily available information for applicants across specialties. However, little information exists on what characteristics and content on obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residency program accounts attract more followers or engagement. OBJECTIVES: To identify social media trends in OBGYN residencies and determine which aspects of programs influence the number of followers and interaction with content posted. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of ACGME accredited OBGYN programs and determined their presence on Instagram and X in the fall of 2021. Content from the thirty programs with the most followers was analyzed independently by two authors. Multivariate analysis and a linear mixed model were used to characterize and evaluate content on Instagram and X. RESULTS: Most programs utilized Instagram (88.5%, N = 262/296) and were managed solely by residents (84.4%, N = 108/128). Number of followers on Instagram positively correlated with features such as program size, Instagram profile duration, and Doximity rankings (p < 0.0x01). Programs on X had more followers if their profile had a longer duration, followed more individuals, or were ranked higher on Doximity. The most posted Instagram content was biographical and social in nature. Instagram posts with the highest engagement were awards and/or the Match. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding what social media content attracts more followers and increases engagement is crucial as it likely impacts OBGYN resident recruitment. Professional groups should establish guidelines for social media use in recruitment for the protection of both residents and applicants.

Implementation and Evaluation of Educational Workshops to Increase Primary Care Provider and Medical Student Comfort in Psychiatric Care.

OBJECTIVE: Mental health treatment is often initiated in primary care settings, but many primary care providers (PCPs), residents, and medical students report discomfort in managing psychiatric conditions. This study evaluated the effect of an educational workshop that featured an evidence-based psychopharmacology clinical decision support tool (CDST) on trainee confidence and willingness to treat psychiatric conditions. METHODS: Participants completed pre- and post-workshop surveys. Nine months after the workshop, a subset of trainees participated in a focus group. RESULTS: Of the participants, 62.5% of the obstetrics-gynecology (OB-GYN) resident physicians (10/16) and 100% of the medical students (18/18) completed both pre- and post-surveys. Following the workshop, OB-GYN resident physicians reported significantly improved confidence in treating psychiatric disorders (p < 0.001), sense of having psychiatric support tools (p < 0.001), and knowledge of treating psychiatric disorders (p = 0.021). Medical students reported significantly improved confidence in treating psychiatric disorders (p < 0.001), willingness to devise treatment plans for psychiatric disorders (p = 0.024), sense of having psychiatric support tools (p < 0.001), knowledge of treating psychiatric disorders (p < 0.001), and comfort in presenting a psychiatric treatment plan to an attending (p = 0.003). Most focus group participants (93.75%; 15/16) reported that they continued to use the CDST, and it increased their confidence in formulating psychiatric treatment plans. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that educational workshops that introduce high-quality psychopharmacology CDSTs may be an effective method for improving provider comfort in treating psychiatric disorders.

The COVID-19 pandemic and OBGYN residency training: We have a problem and it's not just masks.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has left no one untouched. Resident trainees have been driven to reconsider virtually every component of their daily lives. The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) residency training and education. METHODS: A cross-sectional pilot study was conducted between 2/2022 and 5/2022. A survey was created and distributed to OBGYN residents. The survey queried the effects of the pandemic on OBGYN residents' procedure skills training and mental health. RESULTS: A total of 95 OBGYN residents across programs affiliated with each American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) district participated in the survey. Among them, just over half (n = 52, 55%) self-identified as under-represented minorities. A significant majority, 80% (n = 81), felt their gynecological training was inadequate, with 70% of fourth-year residents expressing a lack of confidence in their ability to independently practice gynecology after graduation. This lack of confidence among fourth-year residents suggests a notable disparity in readiness for independent gynecological practice, linked to meeting ACGME requirements before completing their residency (p = 0.013). Among the residents who reported a negative impact of the pandemic on their mental health (n = 76, 80%), about 40% (n = 31) had contemplated self-harm or knew a colleague who considered or attempted suicide (p < 0.001). This issue was especially pronounced in residents experiencing burnout (n = 44, 46%), as nearly half (n = 19, 43%) reported suicidal thoughts or knew someone in their program who had such thoughts or engaged in self-harm (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Residents expressed concerns about reduced hands-on gynecological training and doubts about their readiness for independent practice post-residency, highlighting the need for enhanced support through mentorship and revised training curriculums. Additionally, despite the availability of mental health resources to address pandemic-induced burnout, their underuse suggests a need for more accessible time for residents to use at their discretion and flexible training schedules that encourage mental health support resource utilization.

Use of In-Training Examination Scores as a Fellowship Candidate Evaluation Metric: Time for a Change.

ABSTRACT: In the field of obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) administers an annual in-training examination to all OB/GYN residents as a formative educational tool for assessing medical knowledge and promoting self-improvement. Although the CREOG examination is not designed or intended for knowledge certification, many OB/GYN subspecialty fellowship programs request and use CREOG examination scores as a metric to evaluate fellowship candidates. Among the 57 gynecology-based urogynecology fellowship programs, 30 programs (53%) request CREOG examination scores to be submitted by candidates, as of March 2023. Although the use of CREOG examination scores as an evaluation metric may constitute a minor component within the fellowship match process, this practice fundamentally contradicts the intended purpose of the examination as an educational self-assessment. In addition, it introduces the potential for bias in fellowship recruitment, lacks psychometric validity in predicting specialty board examination failure, and shifts the CREOG examination from its original intention as low-stakes self-assessment into a high-stakes examination akin to a certification examination. For these reasons, we call upon the urogynecology community to prioritize the educational mission of the CREOG examination and reconsider the practice of requesting or using CREOG examination scores in the fellowship match progress.

The Effect of a Simulation-based Intervention on Emergency Medicine Resident Management of Early Pregnancy Loss.

Background: The evaluation of patients with first-trimester vaginal bleeding and concern for early pregnancy loss (EPL) frequently occurs in the emergency department (ED), accounting for approximately 1.6% of all ED visits.1 Unfortunately, these patients consistently report negative experiences with ED care.2-8 In addition to environmental concerns, such as long wait times, patients often describe negative interactions with staff, including a perceived lack of empathy, the use of insensitive language, and inadequate counseling.2,3 These patients and their partners often view EPL as a traumatic loss of life and commonly experience prolonged grief reactions, including anxiety and depression.9-11 Poor satisfaction with care has been associated with worse mental health outcomes.12 These complaints represent an important opportunity for improvement in emergency medicine (EM) training.13 While no published literature to date describes the performance of EM residents in managing patients presenting with EPL, studies suggest that even obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents find these interactions challenging.14,15 Simulation- and didactic-based training has been shown to be beneficial in improving OB/GYN resident EPL counseling and has been associated with improved patient outcomes.16 To our knowledge, this has yet to be replicated in EM residency training. Objectives: We aimed to develop and evaluate a simulation-based educational intervention to improve EM resident management of patients presenting with EPL.

The Parental Leave Paradox in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Medical school, residency, and fellowship occur during peak reproductive years for most trainees. This poses certain challenges for medical trainees as they approach family-building decisions. While the demands of residency have been well-elucidated, attempts at mitigating these demands alongside parenthood have long been neglected across various specialties. These challenges are perhaps most pronounced in Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs, which are made-up of an 85% female-identifying workforce and whose training focuses on prenatal and postpartum health. Recent literature suggests an improvement in attitudes and policies towards parental leave during medical graduate education, however, there remains a lack of uniformity across specialties and programs. Through a recently developed Parental Leave Task Force made up of Obstetrics and Gynecology Trainees, we sought to conduct a review of the literature examining parental leave policies and their implications across various specialties as a call for uniform parental leave policies for all residents.

Hiding in Plain Sight: Resident Remediation in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

OBJECTIVE: Residents who are in need of remediation are prevalent across residency programs and often tend to be deficient in multiple competencies that the American Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has established. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of residents requiring remediation, understand the scope of the challenges in resident remediation, and assess what resources were used to aid in remediation in obstetrics and gynecology programs. DESIGN: An anonymous survey was emailed to obstetrics and gynecology program directors. Survey responses were summarized through descriptive statistics. SETTING: Obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors were invited to respond to this survey. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine respondents out of 241 residency training programs responded (16%). RESULTS: The majority (84.6%) of programs had placed a resident on remediation. The most common area requiring remediation was professionalism (75.8%), followed by medical knowledge (72.7%), interpersonal communication (60.6%), laparoscopic technical skills (54.6%), and inpatient care (42.4%). Residents who required remediation were identified in a number of ways, most commonly through feedback from the Clinical Competency Committee (87.8%) and faculty feedback (84.8%). Program directors utilized a variety of resources, most commonly prior remediation plans from the program, to create remediation plans. Sixty percent of programs had residents who failed remediation. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the prevalence of resident remediation in obstetrics and gynecology training programs and the importance of faculty in identifying residents in need of remediation, evaluating residents, and mentoring residents.

Obstetrics and gynecology applicant perceptions of residency program culture with virtual interviews: a qualitative analysis of social media posts.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, Obstetrics and Gynecology residency interviews are instrumental in assessing the compatibility between medical student applicants and residency programs during the match process. Applicant perceptions of Obstetrics and Gynecology residency culture are a key component in determining how they rank residency programs. In 2020, residency interviews transitioned to a virtual format, and little is known about how applicants evaluated program culture during this first round of universal virtual interviews. Medical students in the United States commonly use Reddit, a popular social media platform, to discuss residency programs and share interview experiences. We explored Obstetrics and Gynecology applicants' considerations regarding residency program culture during the first universal virtual interview season in 2020-2021 by analyzing posts on a Google spreadsheet accessed through Reddit. METHODS: In 2022, we imported 731 posts from the "2020-21 OB GYN Residency Applicant Spreadsheet" Google spreadsheet posted to the 2020-2021 Residency Interview Spreadsheet megathread on the r/medicalschool subreddit to NVivo 12(QSR International, Burlington, MA), a qualitative analysis software program. Three investigators used qualitative inductive techniques to code and identify themes. RESULTS: Applicants used visual, verbal and behavioral cues during virtual Obstetrics and Gynecology residency interviews to understand three components of the workplace culture: prioritization of diversity, equity and inclusion, social environment, and resident workload. CONCLUSIONS: Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs convey information about their culture during virtual interviews through the behavior, appearances and responses of residents and interviewers to applicant questions. To ensure they accurately represent their culture to applicants, programs should consider educating residents and faculty around the implications of interview-day conduct.

Successful Implementation of the AIUM Standardized 4-Year Residency Ultrasound Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Lessons Learned and Way Forward.

BACKGROUND: Significant disparities in sonographic education exist in Obstetrics and Gynecology programs in the United States. To address the lack of standardization in ultrasound teaching, the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) assembled a multi-society task force in 2018 that resulted in the publication of a Consensus Report outlining a standardized ultrasound curriculum and competency assessment. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the study was to implement the AUIM standardized curriculum within an Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program at a tertiary medical center, and report on the early implementation experience. The secondary objective was to assess current national practices in ultrasound training in Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs. STUDY DESIGN: Study design was an effectiveness-implementation hybrid study of a structured ultrasound educational program based on the 2018 AIUM Consensus Report. The theoretical portion of the curriculum consisted of 26 hours of didactic lectures distributed over 4 years. For the practical component, residents received instruction from faculty and sonographers and independently acquired the required images as part of their regular clinical work. Simulator app access was also provided for additional opportunities to practice and acquire images. Deidentified images for the required competencies were uploaded to a WhatsApp group for review. Theoretical knowledge was assessed with a series of multiple-choice exams. Practical skills were assessed through grading of images submitted through WhatsApp as well as direct observations of resident scans. At the completion of 4 years, the assessment of both theoretical knowledge and practical skills was carried out using the ISUOG Basic Training Examination. National patterns in the area of ultrasound education were assessed with a four-question electronic survey of Obstetrics and Gynecology program directors in the United States. Analysis of both portions of the study was primarily descriptive. RESULTS: Four Obstetrics and Gynecology residents completed the curriculum spanning postgraduate years 1 through 4. The number of competencies completed ranged from 7 to 19 out of 41. All of the residents passed the theoretical and practical components of the ISUOG Basic Training Examination. For the residency program director survey portion of the study, response rate was 20% (59 of 290). Among the respondents, 55.9% reported having a structured curriculum and 34.4% reported implementing the AIUM curriculum. The two most commonly cited obstacles to implementation of structured ultrasound teaching were uncertainty with how to start the process (49.2%) and lack of faculty engagement (49.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the AIUM Curriculum within the framework of an Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program at a tertiary medical center is feasible. In our experimental group, completion of the curriculum resulted in passing of an internationally recognized validated assessment. Obstacles to implementation in our program included a wide range of engagement and participation among residents, and limited opportunities to obtain some of the required competencies. Identification of obstacles to implementation from the perspective of residency program directors is critical for developing targeted approaches to ensure widespread implementation. Successful standardized validated sonographic training of graduating Obstetrics and Gynecology residents is crucial for this operator-dependent modality that has tremendous implications on patient safety and clinical care.

Who's Haywood? Path to Leadership: I Am NO Jackie Robinson.

Having been afforded many opportunities throughout my academic career, I took on the challenges that chronicled my path to leadership. In many instances, I was the first person of color to enter that educational and leadership environment. I am grateful to many mentors who have guided and supported me over the 4 decades since the time of my residency through fellowships and the various institutions to which I have been affiliated. It continues to be a great journey, making a contribution to the Ob Gyn academic community and advocating for quality and equitable women's health care.

Career Reflections: The Winding Path From County Mayo, Ireland to New York City.

Dr. Mary D'Alton's career journey intertwines her upbringing in County Mayo, Ireland, with impactful contributions to Obstetrics and Gynecology in New York City. From childhood lessons in community care to transformative experiences in Canada and prestigious mentorships, her leadership at Columbia University and NewYork-Presbyterian has fostered innovative initiatives addressing maternal health. Philanthropy plays a pivotal role in realizing her vision, including mental health integration within women's health care. International reach, exemplified by a successful fellowship program with Ireland, underscores her commitment to collaboration Dr. D'Alton's reflections illuminate the transformative power of teamwork, mentorship, and innovation in advancing women's health worldwide.

The outcomes of team-based learning vs small group interactive learning in the obstetrics and gynecology course for undergraduate students.

INTRODUCTION: Team-based learning (TBL) is a well-established active teaching method which has been shown to have pedagogical advantages in some areas such as business education and preclinical disciplines in undergraduate medical education. Increasingly, it has been adapted to clinical disciplines. However, its superiority over conventional learning methods used in clinical years of medical school remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare TBL with traditional seminars delivered in small group interactive learning (SIL) format in terms of knowledge acquisition and retention, satisfaction and engagement of undergraduate medical students during the 6-week obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted at Karolinska Institutet, a medical university in Sweden, and had a prospective, crossover design. All fifth-year medical students attending the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship, at four different teaching hospitals in Stockholm (approximately 40 students per site), in the Autumn semester of 2022 were invited to participate. Two seminars (one in obstetrics and one in gynecology) were designed and delivered in two different formats, ie TBL and SIL. The student:teacher ratio was approximately 10:1 in the traditional SIL seminars and 20:1 in the TBL. All TBL seminars were facilitated by a single teacher who had been trained and certified in TBL. Student knowledge acquisition and retention were assessed by final examination scores, and the engagement and satisfaction were assessed by questionnaires. For the TBL seminars, individual and team readiness assurance tests were also performed and evaluated. RESULTS: Of 148 students participating in the classrooms, 132 answered the questionnaires. No statistically significant differences were observed between TBL and SIL methods with regard to student knowledge acquisition and retention, engagement and satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: We found no differences in student learning outcomes or satisfaction using TBL or SIL methods. However, as TBL had a double the student to teacher ratio as compared with SIL, in settings where teachers are scarce and suitable rooms are available for TBL sessions, the method may be beneficial in reducing faculty workload without compromising students' learning outcomes.

Teaching principles of electrosurgery to OBGYN trainees via simulation: A hands-on approach.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons use electrosurgery daily, though most of them are unfamiliar with its basic safety principles. METHOD: We have designed a hands-on simulation session to teach OBGYN trainees principles of electrosurgery with practical implications for safety in the operating room. 15 participants completed post-session surveys. EXPERIENCE: Our experience of serially refining teaching materials and electrosurgery demonstrations resulted in a comprehensive guide to electrosurgery in OBGYN. CONCLUSION: This report will allow surgeon educators to implement simulation training in their institutions.

Mixed Signals: Navigating the Obstetrics and Gynecology Signaling Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: There are few published accounts of the obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) specialty-specific experience with a formal signaling program. Prior studies examining other medical specialties' experiences with signaling are quantitative, having not examined the complexity of the residency applicant experience by directly engaging applicants; therefore, this study aimed to describe the lived experiences of OBGYN residency applicants who employed a formal signaling program during the 2022-2023 residency application cycle to assist and guide future residency applicants. DESIGN: A phenomenological approach was chosen to prescribe a common meaning for OBGYN residency applicants' experiences. purposeful sampling was employed to ensure racial, ethnic, and institutional geographic diversity in participant representation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually between April and May 2023. RESULTS: Twenty-five OBGYN residency applicants participated. Fourteen identified as underrepresented in medicine. Four themes emerged: non-uniform decision-making processes, inconsistent guidance, mental health effect, and signaling reflections. Some themes had associated subthemes. Critical aspects of the applicants' journey were revealed, including decision-making dynamics and reliance on trusted advisors. Applicants described tensions and complexities when navigating signaling strategy in relation to abortion education opportunities in a post-Dobbs era. They also conveyed concerns about inconsistencies in signaling guidance, the emotional toll on well-being, and persistent inequities in the application process. They ultimately made recommendations for future directions, including suggestions for more robust advising and improved signaling execution. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a comprehensive exploration of the experiences of OBGYN residency applicants with formal program signaling. To ensure equity and transparency in the residency application process, it is crucial to not only provide OBGYN residency applicants with clear guidance on signaling, but also encourage a standardized approach for its utilization by residency programs.