Delayed bowel necrosis due to inferior mesenteric artery occlusion in Stanford type A acute aortic dissection.

Although inferior mesenteric artery occlusion due to acute aortic dissection sometimes occurs, it is usually not considered an important finding. Herein, we present an extremely rare case of delayed bowel ischaemia due to inferior mesenteric artery occlusion in Stanford type A acute aortic dissection that highlights the need for cardiac surgeons to be mindful of inferior mesenteric artery occlusion in patients with superior mesenteric artery dissection or vascular anomalies in the mesenteric arteries.

Hospital-based delays to revascularization increase risk of postoperative mortality and short bowel syndrome in acute mesenteric ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a surgical emergency for which delays in treatment have been closely associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although the duration of ischemia as a determinant of outcomes for AMI is well known, the objective of this study was to identify hospital-based determinants of delayed revascularization and their effects on postoperative morbidity and mortality in AMI. METHODS: All patients who underwent any surgery for AMI from a multi-center hospital system between 2010 and 2020 were divided into two groups based on timeliness of mesenteric revascularization after presentation. Early revascularization (ER) was defined as having both vascular consultation ≤12 hours of presentation and vascular surgery performed at the patient's initial operation. Delayed revascularization (DR) was defined as having either delays to vascular consultation or vascular surgery. A retrospective review of demographic and postoperative data was performed. The effect of DR on major postoperative outcomes, including 30-day and 2-year mortality, total length of bowel resection, and development of short bowel syndrome, were analyzed. Effects of delayed vascular consultation alone, delayed vascular surgery alone, no revascularization during admission, and admitting service on outcomes were also examined on subgroup analyses. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients were analyzed. Ninety-nine patients received ER, whereas the remaining 113 patients experienced a DR after hospital presentation. Among the DR group, 55 patients (25.9%) had delayed vascular consultation, whereas vascular surgery was deferred until after the initial operation in 37 patients (17.4%). Fifty-one patients (24.0%) were never revascularized during admission. DR was a significant predictor of 30-day (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-4.9; P = .03) and 2-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.55, 95% CI, 1.0-2.3; P = .04). DR was also independently associated with increased bowel resection length (OR, 7.47; P < .01) and postoperative short bowel syndrome (OR, 2.4; P = .03) on multivariate analyses. When examined separately on subgroup analysis, both delayed vascular consultation (OR, 3.38; P = .03) and vascular surgery (OR, 4.31; P < .01) independently increased risk of 30-day mortality. Hospital discharge after AMI without mesenteric revascularization was associated with increased risk of short bowel syndrome (OR, 2.94; P < .01) and late mortality (hazard ratio, 1.60; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed vascular consultation and vascular surgery are both significant hospital-based determinants of postoperative mortality and short bowel syndrome in patients with AMI. Timing-based management protocols that emphasize routine evaluation by a vascular surgeon and early, definitive mesenteric revascularization should be established and widely adopted for all patients with clinically suspected AMI at presentation.

Outcomes of different acute mesenteric ischemia therapies in the last 20 years: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Acute mesenteric ischemia is a disease with high morbidity and mortality, and it is traditionally treated with open surgery. Endovascular therapy and hybrid techniques are alternative treatments that are also currently available. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of the different treatment approaches in the last 20 years. METHODS: Studies on acute mesenteric ischemia that were indexed in PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases (from January 1, 2000, to April 1, 2021) were reviewed. All related retrospective observational studies and case series were included. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates, and the results were reported as proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In our study, a total of 2369 patients (in 39 studies) underwent endovascular, open surgery, or retrograde open mesenteric stenting. The pooled mortality estimates for open surgery, endovascular therapy, and retrograde open mesenteric stenting were 40% (95% CI, 0.33-0.47; I2 = 84%), 26% (95% CI, 0.19-0.33; I2 = 33%), and 32% (95% CI, 0.21-0.44; I2 = 26%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality associated with open surgical treatment, endovascular therapy, and retrograde open mesenteric stenting tend to be similar in the last 20 years.

Contemporary management of acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia: 10-year experience from a multihospital healthcare system.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular and hybrid methods have been increasingly used to treat mesenteric ischemia. However, the long-term outcomes and risk of symptom recurrence remain unknown. The objective of the present study was to define the predictors of postoperative morbidity, mortality, and patency loss for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) and chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). METHODS: The inpatient and follow-up records for all patients who had undergone revascularization for AMI and CMI from 2010 to 2020 at a multicenter hospital system were reviewed. Patency and mortality were evaluated with Cox regression, visualized with Kaplan-Meier curves, and compared using log-rank testing. Patency was further evaluated using Fine-Gray regression with death as a competing risk. The postoperative major adverse events (MAE) and 30-day mortality were evaluated with logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 407 patients were included, 148 with AMI and 259 with CMI. For the AMI group, the 30-day mortality was 31%. Open surgery was associated with lower rates of bowel resection (odds ratio [OR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.61). The etiology of AMI also did not change the outcomes (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.77-2.19). Adjusted analyses indicated that a history of diabetes (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.37-5.61) and sepsis on presentation (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.18-4.58) were independently associated with an increased risk of 30-day MAE. In the CMI group, open surgery and chronic kidney disease were associated with a higher incidence of MAE (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.14-8.05; OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.31-4.31). In contrast, chronic kidney disease (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.10-8.37) and inpatient status before revascularization (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.01-7.61) were associated with increased 30-day mortality. For the CMI group, the endovascular cohort had experienced greater rates of symptom recurrence (29% vs 13%) with a faster onset (endovascular, 64 days; vs bypass, 338 days). CONCLUSIONS: AMI remains a morbid disease despite the evolving revascularization techniques. An open approach should remain the reference standard because it reduces the likelihood of bowel resection. For CMI, endovascular interventions have improved the postoperative morbidity but have also resulted in early symptom recurrence and reintervention. An endovascular-first approach should be the standard of care for CMI with close surveillance.

Tratamento combinado na dissecção de artéria mesentérica superior: desafio terapêutico / Combination treatment for superior mesenteric artery dissection: therapeutic challenge

Resumo A dissecção da artéria mesentérica superior é uma causa rara de dor abdominal, com quadro clínico variável. Seu diagnóstico é difícil, e não existe consenso sobre suas opções terapêuticas; elas variam em torno de tratamento conservador, correção aberta, endovascular ou combinada. Descrevemos o caso de um homem de 45 anos com dissecção isolada da artéria mesentérica superior, com quadro de dor abdominal persistente após tentativa de tratamento conservador. Ele foi submetido à revascularização cirúrgica aberta devido à localização e complexidade da dissecção. O tratamento com endarterectomia, arterioplastia com remendo de pericárdio bovino e acesso retrógrado para abertura da mesentérica com stent foi realizado com sucesso. A angina abdominal foi totalmente resolvida após estabilização do quadro. A combinação de abordagem aberta e endovascular deve ser considerada como terapia para casos de dissecção complexa isolada da artéria mesentérica superior.

Abstract Dissection of the superior mesenteric artery is a rare cause of abdominal pain, with a variable clinical picture. It is difficult to diagnose and there is no consensus on treatment options, which range from conservative treatment to open, endovascular, or combination repair. We describe the case of a 45-year-old man with isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery and persistent abdominal pain after conservative treatment had been attempted. He underwent open surgical revascularization due to the location and complexity of the dissection. Treatment consisting of endarterectomy, arterioplasty with bovine pericardium patch, and retrograde access to open the mesenteric artery with a stent was successful. Abdominal angina was completely resolved after the condition had stabilized. A combination of open and endovascular approaches should be considered as treatment for cases of isolated complex dissection of the superior mesenteric artery.

Acute mesenteric ischemia as late complication of previous endovascular treatment in young woman. Case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) represents a severe complication of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) which is a disorder caused by severe stenosis or occlusion of mesenteric arterial supply. If untreated, patients could face mesenteric infarction and death. CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old female smoker and drug abuser, previously treated with angioplasty and stenting of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) for CMI four years before, was admitted to our institution suffering from acute abdominal pain due to complete occlusion of the stent. After a few hours of thrombolytic therapy, she experienced sudden worsening of clinical conditions, including AMI, due to complete rethrombosis of the SMA. Thereafter, she underwent urgent thrombectomy and a subsequent retrograde 6 mm prosthetic aorto-mesenteric bypass graft. The patient reported complete relief of symptoms afterwards. A CT scan at 1-month follow-up showed primary patency of the bypass in the absence of clinical recurrence. DISCUSSION: In cases of CMI, treatment options include surgical, endovascular or hybrid approaches. Endovascular therapy, based on percutaneous angioplasty with or without stenting, seems to be effective, although it can have worse midterm and long-term results. CONCLUSION: In patients already treated with an endovascular revascularization of the SMA or celiac trunk (CT), open surgical repair through a single retrograde aorto-mesenteric prosthetic bypass in cases of acute mesenteric ischemia, seems to offer a valid and safe approach in order to prevent bowel infarction. KEY WORDS: Acute mesenteric ischemia Angioplasty, Bypass, stent,Thrombolysis.