Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Med Microbiol ; 73(6)2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38935078

RESUMEN

Introduction. Avian reovirus (ARV) is associated with arthritis/tenosynovitis and malabsorption syndrome in chickens. The σC and σB proteins, both exposed to the virus capsid, are highly immunogenic and could form the basis for diagnostic devices designed to assess the immunological status of the flock.Gap Statement. Commercial ARV ELISAs cannot distinguish between vaccinated and infected animals and might not detect circulating ARV strains.Aim. We aimed to develop a customized test to detect the circulating field ARV strains as well as distinguish between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals.Methodology. We developed ELISA assays based on recombinant (r) σB, σC and the nonstructural protein σNS and tested them using antisera of vaccinated and unvaccinated chickens as well as negative controls. Fragments of σB and σC proteins were also used to study regions that could be further exploited in diagnostic tests.Results. Vaccinated and unvaccinated birds were positive by commercial ELISA, with no difference in optical density values. In contrast, samples of unvaccinated animals showed lower absorbance in the rσB and rσC ELISA tests and higher absorbance in the rσNS ELISA test than the vaccinated animals. Negative control samples were negative in all tests. Fragmentation of σB and σC proteins showed that some regions can differentiate between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals. For example, σB amino acids 128-179 (σB-F4) and σC amino acids 121-165 (σC-F4) exhibited 85 and 95% positivity among samples of vaccinated animals but only 5% and zero positivity among samples of unvaccinated animals, respectively.Conclusion. These data suggest that unvaccinated birds might have been exposed to field strains of ARV. The reduction in absorbance in the recombinant tests possibly reflects an increased specificity of our test since unvaccinated samples showed less cross-reactivity with the vaccine proteins immobilized on ELISAs. The discrepant results obtained with the protein fragment tests between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals are discussed in light of the diversity between ARV strains.


Asunto(s)
Pollos , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Orthoreovirus Aviar , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral , Proteínas Recombinantes , Infecciones por Reoviridae , Animales , Orthoreovirus Aviar/inmunología , Orthoreovirus Aviar/genética , Orthoreovirus Aviar/aislamiento & purificación , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Infecciones por Reoviridae/veterinaria , Infecciones por Reoviridae/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/virología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/diagnóstico , Proteínas Recombinantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Proteínas de la Cápside/inmunología , Proteínas de la Cápside/genética , Proteínas Virales/inmunología , Proteínas Virales/genética
2.
Int J Biol Macromol ; 274(Pt 1): 133246, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38908633

RESUMEN

The mixed infection of duck hepatitis A virus 3 (DHAV-3) and novel duck reovirus (NDRV) has caused significant losses to the global duck farming industry. On-site point-of-care testing of viruses plays a crucial role in the early diagnosis, prevention, and disease control. Here, we proposed an RPA-CRISPR Cas12a/Cas13a one-pot strategy (DRCFS) for rapid and simultaneous detection of DHAV-3 and NDRV. This method integrated the reaction of RPA and CRISPR Cas12a/Cas13a in a single tube, eliminating the need to open the lid during the intermediate processes and thereby avoiding aerosol contamination. On this basis, we proposed a dual RPA-CRISPR strategy coupled with a lateral flow analysis platform (DRC-LFA). This circumvented the necessity for complex instruments, enabling direct visual interpretation of results, making the test more accessible and user-friendly. Our findings demonstrated that the DRCFS method could detect DHAV-3 and NDRV at concentrations as low as 100 copy/µL, while DRC-LFA achieved limit of 101 copies/µL within 35 min. Furthermore, when DRCFS, DRC-LFA, and qPCR were employed collectively for clinical samples analysis, all three methods yielded consistent results. The specificity, sensitivity, and user-friendly of these methods rendered them invaluable for on-site virus detection.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas CRISPR-Cas , Patos , Animales , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas/genética , Patos/virología , Virus de la Hepatitis del Pato/genética , Virus de la Hepatitis del Pato/aislamiento & purificación , Orthoreovirus Aviar/genética , Orthoreovirus Aviar/aislamiento & purificación
3.
Poult Sci ; 103(8): 103940, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38909506

RESUMEN

Migratory wild birds can carry various pathogens, such as influenza A virus, which can spread to globally and cause disease outbreaks and epidemics. Continuous epidemiological surveillance of migratory wild birds is of great significance for the early warning, prevention, and control of epidemics. To investigate the pathogen infection status of migratory wild birds in eastern China, fecal samples were collected from wetlands to conduct pathogen surveillance. The results showed that duck orthoreovirus (DRV) and goose parvovirus (GPV) nucleic acid were detected positive in the fecal samples collected from wild ducks, egrets, and swan. Phylogenetic analysis of the amplified viral genes reveals that the isolates were closely related to the prevalent strains in the regions involved in East Asian-Australasian (EAA) migratory flyway. Phylogenetic analysis of the amplified viral genes confirmed that they were closely related to circulating strains in the regions involved in the EAA migration pathway. The findings of this study have expanded the host range of the orthoreovirus and parvovirus, and revealed possible virus transmission between wild migratory birds and poultry.


Asunto(s)
Animales Salvajes , Enfermedades de las Aves , Orthoreovirus Aviar , Infecciones por Parvoviridae , Parvovirus , Filogenia , Infecciones por Reoviridae , Animales , Infecciones por Reoviridae/veterinaria , Infecciones por Reoviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Reoviridae/virología , Orthoreovirus Aviar/aislamiento & purificación , Orthoreovirus Aviar/genética , Infecciones por Parvoviridae/veterinaria , Infecciones por Parvoviridae/virología , Infecciones por Parvoviridae/epidemiología , China/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves/virología , Enfermedades de las Aves/epidemiología , Animales Salvajes/virología , Parvovirus/genética , Parvovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Heces/virología , Reservorios de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Reservorios de Enfermedades/virología , Patos/virología , Anseriformes/virología , Monitoreo Epidemiológico/veterinaria
4.
Avian Pathol ; 53(5): 400-407, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629680

RESUMEN

Avian reovirus (ARV) has been continuously affecting the poultry industry in Pennsylvania (PA) in recent years. This report provides our diagnostic investigation on monitoring ARV field variants from broiler chickens in Pennsylvania. Genomic characterization findings of 72 ARV field isolates obtained from broiler cases during the last 6 years indicated that six distinct cluster variant strains (genotype I-VI), which were genetically diverse and distant from the vaccine and vaccine-related field strains, continuously circulated in PA poultry. Most of the variants clustered within genotype V (24/72, 33.3%), followed by genotype II (16/72, 22.2%), genotype IV (13/72, 18.1%), genotype III (13/72, 18.1%), genotype VI (05/72, 6.94%), and genotype I (1/72, 1.38%). The amino acid identity between 72 field variants and the vaccine strains (1133, 1733, 2408, 2177) varied from 45.3% to 99.7%, while the difference in amino acid counts ranged from 1-164. Among the field variants, the amino acid identity and count difference ranged from 43.3% to 100% and 0 to 170, respectively. Variants within genotype V had maximum amino acid identity (94.7-100%), whereas none of the variants within genotypes II and VI were alike. These findings indicate the continuing occurrence of multiple ARV genotypes in the environment.


Asunto(s)
Pollos , Genotipo , Orthoreovirus Aviar , Filogenia , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral , Infecciones por Reoviridae , Animales , Pollos/virología , Orthoreovirus Aviar/genética , Orthoreovirus Aviar/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/virología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Infecciones por Reoviridae/veterinaria , Infecciones por Reoviridae/virología , Infecciones por Reoviridae/epidemiología , Variación Genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA