RESUMEN
This study uses electronic health record data to evaluate medical record closure outcomes before and after the use of medical scribes at a large academic medical center.
Asunto(s)
Documentación , Administradores de Registros Médicos , Registros Médicos , Práctica Profesional , Documentación/métodos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Administradores de Registros Médicos/organización & administración , Satisfacción del Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Práctica Profesional/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A survey was conducted at the 2021 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) to evaluate current practice management strategies among AAHKS members. METHODS: An application was used by AAHKS members to answer both multiple-choice and yes or no questions. Specific questions were asked regarding the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on practice patterns. RESULTS: There was a dramatic acceleration in same day total joint arthroplasty with 85% of AAHKS members performing same day total joint arthroplasty. More AAHKS members remain in private practice (46%) than other practice types, whereas fee for service (34%) and relative value units (26%) are the major form of compensation. At the present time, 93% of practices are experiencing staffing shortages, and these shortages are having an impact on surgical volume. CONCLUSION: This survey elucidates the current practice patterns of AAHKS members. The pandemic has had a significant impact on some aspects of practice activity. Future surveys need to monitor changes in practice patterns over time.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , COVID-19 , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Ortopedia , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Ortopedia/economía , Ortopedia/organización & administración , Ortopedia/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional/economía , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Profesional/economía , Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was an assessment of availability postoperative pain management quality measures and National Quality Forum-endorsed measures. Postoperative pain is an important clinical timepoint because poor pain control can lead to patient suffering, chronic opiate use, and/or chronic pain. Quality measures can guide best practices, but it is unclear whether there are measures for managing pain after surgery. METHODS: The National Quality Forum Quality Positioning System, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Indicators, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Measures Inventory Tool databases were searched in November 2019. We conducted a systematic literature review to further identify quality measures in research publications, clinical practice guidelines, and gray literature for the period between March 11, 2015 and March 11, 2020. RESULTS: Our systematic review yielded 1,328 publications, of which 206 were pertinent. Nineteen pain management quality measures were identified from the quality measure databases, and 5 were endorsed by National Quality Forum. The National Quality Forum measures were not specific to postoperative pain management. Three of the non-endorsed measures were specific to postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: The dearth of published postoperative pain management quality measures, especially National Quality Forum-endorsed measures, highlights the need for more rigorous evidence and widely endorsed postoperative pain quality measures to guide best practices.
Asunto(s)
Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Postoperatorio/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Brechas de la Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Estados Unidos , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Little is known about provider specialties involved in thyroid cancer diagnosis and management. OBJECTIVE: Characterize providers involved in diagnosing and treating thyroid cancer. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: We surveyed patients with differentiated thyroid cancer from the Georgia and Los Angeles County Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries (N = 2632, 63% response rate). Patients identified their primary care physicians (PCPs), who were also surveyed (N = 162, 56% response rate). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Patient-reported provider involvement (endocrinologist, surgeon, PCP) at diagnosis and treatment; (2) PCP-reported involvement (more vs less) and comfort (more vs less) with discussing diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: Among thyroid cancer patients, 40.6% reported being informed of their diagnosis by their surgeon, 37.9% by their endocrinologist, and 13.5% by their PCP. Patients reported discussing their treatment with their surgeon (71.7%), endocrinologist (69.6%), and PCP (33.3%). Physician specialty involvement in diagnosis and treatment varied by patient race/ethnicity and age. For example, Hispanic patients (vs non-Hispanic White) were more likely to report their PCP informed them of their diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.68; 95% CI, 1.24-2.27). Patients ≥65 years (vs <45 years) were more likely to discuss treatment with their PCP (OR: 1.59; 95% CI, 1.22-2.08). Although 74% of PCPs reported discussing their patients' diagnosis and 62% their treatment, only 66% and 48%, respectively, were comfortable doing so. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs were involved in thyroid cancer diagnosis and treatment, and their involvement was greater among older patients and patients of minority race/ethnicity. This suggests an opportunity to leverage PCP involvement in thyroid cancer management to improve health and quality of care outcomes for vulnerable patients.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/terapia , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Endocrinólogos/organización & administración , Endocrinólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos de Atención Primaria/organización & administración , Médicos de Atención Primaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/organización & administración , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Poblaciones Vulnerables/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, multidisciplinary "toe and flow" programs have gained great popularity, with proven benefits in limb salvage. Many vascular surgeons have incorporated podiatrists into their practices. The viability of this practice model requires close partnership, hospital support, and financial sustainability. We intend to examine the economic values of podiatrists in a busy safety-net hospital in the Southwest United States. METHODS: An administrative database that captured monthly operating room (OR) cases, clinic encounters, in-patient volume, and total work relative value units (wRVUs) in an established limb salvage program in a tertiary referral center were examined. The practice has a diverse patient population with >30% of minority patients. During a period of 3 years, there was a significant change in the number of podiatrists (from 1 to 4) within the program, whereas the clinical full-time employees for vascular surgeons remained relatively stable. RESULTS: The limb salvage program experienced >100% of growth in total OR volumes, clinic encounters, and total wRVUs over a period of 4 years. A total of 35,591 patients were evaluated in a multidisciplinary limb salvage clinic, and 5535 procedures were performed. The initial growth of clinic volume and operative volume (P < .01) were attributed by the addition of vascular surgeons in year one. However, recruitment of podiatrists to the program significantly increased clinic and OR volume by an additional 60% and >40%, respectively (P < .01) in the past 3 years. With equal number of surgeons, podiatry contributed 40% of total wRVUs generated by the entire program in 2019. Despite the fact that that most of the foot and ankle procedures that were regularly performed by vascular surgeons were shifted to the podiatrists, vascular surgeons continued to experience an incremental increase in operative volume and >10% of increase in wRVUs. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the value of close collaboration between podiatry and vascular in a limb salvage program extends beyond a patient's clinical outcome. A financial advantage of including podiatrists in a vascular surgery practice is clearly demonstrated.
Asunto(s)
Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/economía , Podiatría/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Cirujanos/economía , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Colaboración Intersectorial , Recuperación del Miembro/economía , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Podiatría/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirujanos/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
Importance: Little is known about whether a clinician having multiple hospital affiliations (ie, 1 clinician working across multiple teams and organizations) is associated with clinician practice style and cost. The measurement of this association requires adjusting for selection into multihospital affiliations based on both observable and unobservable clinician characteristics. Objective: To evaluate the association of multiple hospital affiliations with clinician service use, breadth of procedures used, and costs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used Medicare Part B data from 2016 through 2017 in a fixed-effects panel data design to compare service use, procedure breadth, and costs between clinicians with multiple affiliations (treatment group) and clinicians with a single affiliation (control group), with adjustment for volume, patients, and clinician characteristics. The study also controlled for unobserved (time-invariant) clinician characteristics using individual clinician fixed effects. Clinicians with Medicare claims, a reported National Provider Identifier, and affiliation data within Medicare Physician Compare were included for a total sample of 1â¯073â¯252 observations (633â¯552 unique clinicians) for medical services and 358â¯669 observations (210â¯260 unique clinicians) for drug prescribing. Statistical analyses were performed from February 1 to October 15, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Service use is the total number of medical (or drug) services that clinicians render to their Medicare beneficiaries within a given year, procedure breadth is the total number of unique Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes that are associated with clinicians' medical (or drug) services within a given year, and costs represent the total standardized amount paid by Medicare for the medical (or drug) services. Additional measures were multiple-hospital affiliations, Accountable Care Organization affiliation, and controls across clinician and patient characteristics. Results: The medical service sample consisted of 633â¯552 clinicians (248â¯359 women [39.2%]; mean [SD] of 19.6 [12.5] years of experience), and the drug service sample consisted of 210â¯260 clinicians (74â¯875 women [35.6%]; mean [SD] of 21.6 [12.3] years of experience). For medical services, clinicians with multiple practice affiliations used a mean 8.2% (95% CI, 7.5%-8.9%; P < .001) more medical services per patient, drew on a mean 5.4% (95% CI, 5.1%-5.7%; P < .001) wider set of procedures within their medical care, and incurred a mean 8.6% (95% CI, 7.9%-9.2%; P < .001) more in medical costs. Pertaining to drug services, clinicians with multiple practice affiliations used a mean 2.9% (95% CI, 1.9%-3.9%; P < .001) more drug services per patient, drew on a mean 1.0% (95% CI, 0.5%-1.4%; P < .001) wider set of procedures within their medical care, and incurred a mean 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-3.7%; P < .001) more in drug costs. Significant results were also found across extensive and intensive margins of hospital affiliation, and supplemental analysis further indicated heterogenous treatment associations across clinician specialties. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that a clinician having multihospital affiliations was associated with greater service use, procedure breadth, and costs across both medical and drug services. These findings suggest that clinician affiliations ought to be considered as part of health care delivery design and potential cost-containment strategies.
Asunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Hospitalaria/economía , Costos de Hospital/organización & administración , Medicare/economía , Afiliación Organizacional/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Administración Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Importance: Despite the growing number of physicians who reduce clinical time owing to research, administrative work, and family responsibilities, the quality of care provided by these physicians remains unclear. Objective: To examine the association between the number of days worked clinically per year by physicians and patient mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis was completed on a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 years and older who were admitted to the hospital with an emergency medical condition and treated by a hospitalist in 2011 through 2016. Because hospitalists typically work in shifts, hospitalists' patients are plausibly quasirandomized to hospitalists based on the hospitalists' work schedules (natural experiment). The associations between hospitalists' number of days worked clinically per year and 30-day patient mortality and readmission rates were examined, adjusting for patient and physician characteristics and hospital fixed effects (effectively comparing physicians within the same hospital). Data analysis was conducted from July 1, 2020, to July 2, 2021. Exposures: Physicians' number of days worked clinically per year. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 30-day patient mortality, and the secondary outcome was 30-day patient readmission. Results: Among 392â¯797 hospitalizations of patients treated by 19â¯170 hospitalists (7482 female [39.0%], 11â¯688 male [61.0%]; mean [SD] age, 41.1 [8.8] years), patients treated by physicians with more days worked clinically exhibited lower mortality. Adjusted 30-day mortality rates were 10.5% (reference), 10.0% (adjusted risk difference [aRD], -0.5%; 95% CI, -0.8% to -0.2%; P = .002), 9.5% (aRD, -0.9%; 95% CI, -1.2% to -0.6%; P < .001), and 9.6% (aRD, -0.9%; 95% CI, -1.2% to -0.6%; P < .001) for physicians in the first (bottom), second, third, and fourth (top) quartile of days worked clinically, respectively. Readmission rates were not associated with the numbers of days a physician worked clinically (adjusted 30-day readmissions for physicians in the bottom quartile of days worked clinically per year vs those in the top quartile, 15.3% vs 15.2%; aRD, -0.1%; 95% CI, -0.5% to 0.3%; P = .61). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, hospitalized Medicare patients treated by physicians who worked more clinical days had lower 30-day mortality. Given that physicians with reduced clinical time must often balance clinical and nonclinical obligations, improved support by institutions may be necessary to maintain the clinical performance of these physicians.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Médicos Hospitalarios , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Correlación de Datos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Médicos Hospitalarios/organización & administración , Médicos Hospitalarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Hospitalarios/provisión & distribución , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
These tips will help identify underlying causes of obesity, address comorbid conditions, and provide patients with the tools they need to successfully lose weight.
Asunto(s)
Consejo/métodos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/métodos , Obesidad/terapia , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Dieta Reductora , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Obesidad/prevención & control , Conducta de Reducción del RiesgoRESUMEN
Our initiation of a reverse-integration practice model revealed numerous advantages and rewards, as well as many challenges, for which we found solutions.
Asunto(s)
Centros Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/métodos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
A focus on specific signs and symptoms-without imaging-may rule out community-acquired pneumonia in outpatients.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/métodos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the relationship between availability of round-the-clock (RTC) in-house intensivists and patient outcomes in people who underwent surgery for a life-threatening emergency general surgery (LT-EGS) disease such as necrotizing soft-tissue infection, ischemic enteritis, perforated viscus, and toxic colitis. METHODS: Data on hospital-level critical care structures and processes from a 2015 survey of 2,811 US hospitals were linked to patient-level data from 17 State Inpatient Databases. Patients who were admitted with a primary diagnosis code for an LT-EGS disease of interest and underwent surgery on date of admission were included in analyses. RESULTS: We identified 3,620 unique LT-EGS admissions at 368 hospitals. At 66% (n = 243) of hospitals, 83.5% (n = 3,021) of patients were treated at hospitals with RTC intensivist-led care. These facilities were more likely to have in-house respiratory therapists and protocols to ensure availability of blood products or adherence to Surviving Sepsis Guidelines. When accounting for other key factors including overnight surgeon availability, perioperative staffing, and annual emergency general surgery case volume, not having a protocol to ensure adherence to Surviving Sepsis Guidelines (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-3.94) was associated with increased odds of mortality. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that focused treatment of sepsis along with surgical source control, rather than RTC intensivist presence, is key feature of optimizing EGS patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level III.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Cirujanos/organización & administración , Anciano , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Attempts to manage the COVID-19 pandemic have led to radical reorganisations of health care systems worldwide. General practitioners (GPs) provide the vast majority of patient care, and knowledge of their experiences with providing care for regular health issues during a pandemic is scarce. Hence, in a Danish context we explored how GPs experienced reorganising their work in an attempt to uphold sufficient patient care while contributing to minimizing the spread of COVID-19. Further, in relation to this, we examined what guided GPs' choices between telephone, video and face-to-face consultations. METHODS: This study consisted of qualitative interviews with 13 GPs. They were interviewed twice, approximately three months apart in the initial phase of the pandemic, and they took daily notes for 20 days. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and inductively analysed. RESULTS: The GPs re-organised their clinical work profoundly. Most consultations were converted to video or telephone, postponed or cancelled. The use of video first rose, but soon declined, once again replaced by an increased use of face-to-face consultations. When choosing between consultation forms, the GPs took into account the need to minimise the risk of COVID-19, the central guidelines, and their own preference for face-to-face consultations. There were variations over time and between the GPs regarding which health issues were dealt with by using video and/or the telephone. For some health issues, the GPs generally deemed it acceptable to use video or telephone, postpone or cancel appointments for a short term, and in a crisis situation. They experienced relational and technical limitations with video consultation, while diagnostic uncertainty was not regarded as a prominent issue CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates how the GPs experienced telephone and video consultations as being useful in a pandemic situation when face-to-face consultations had to be severely restricted. The GPs did, however, identify several limitations similar to those known in non-pandemic times. The weighing of pros and cons and their willingness to use these alternatives shifted and generally diminished when face-to-face consultations were once again deemed viable. In case of future pandemics, such alternatives seem valuable, at least for a short term.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , COVID-19/prevención & control , Medicina General/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Consulta Remota/tendencias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Medicina General/métodos , Medicina General/organización & administración , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Pandemias , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Investigación Cualitativa , Consulta Remota/métodos , Consulta Remota/organización & administración , Teléfono , Comunicación por VideoconferenciaRESUMEN
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often considered the gold-standard test for characterizing cardiac as well as noncardiac structure and function. However, many patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and/or severe renal dysfunction are unable to undergo this test because of safety concerns. In the past 10 years, newer-generation CIEDs and gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) as well as coordinated care between imaging and heart rhythm device teams have mitigated risk to patients and improved access to MRI at many hospitals. The purpose of this statement is to review published data on safety of MRI in patients with conditional and nonconditional CIEDs in addition to patient risks from older and newer GBCAs. This statement was developed through multidisciplinary collaboration of pan-Canadian experts after a relevant and independent literature search by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. All recommendations align with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Key recommendations include: (1) the development of standardized protocols for patients with a CIED undergoing MRI; (2) patients with MRI nonconditional pacemakers and pacemaker dependency should be programmed to asynchronous mode and those with MRI nonconditional transvenous defibrillators should have tachycardia therapies turned off during the scan; and (3) macrocyclic or newer linear GBCAs should be used in preference to older GBCAs because of their better safety profile in patients at higher risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Canadá , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Humanos , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Invenciones/normas , Invenciones/tendencias , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/tendencias , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Mejoramiento de la CalidadRESUMEN
Changes that COVID-19 induced in endocrine daily practice as well as the role of endocrine and metabolic comorbidities in COVID-19 outcomes were among the striking features of this last year. The aim of this statement is to illustrate the major characteristics of the response of European endocrinologists to the pandemic including the disclosure of the endocrine phenotype of COVID-19 with diabetes, obesity and hypovitaminosis D playing a key role in this clinical setting with its huge implication for the prevention and management of the disease. The role of the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) as a reference point of the endocrine community during the pandemic will also be highlighted, including the refocusing of its educational and advocacy activities.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Endocrinólogos/organización & administración , Endocrinología/organización & administración , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/prevención & control , Redes Comunitarias/organización & administración , Redes Comunitarias/tendencias , Atención a la Salud/historia , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Enfermedades del Sistema Endocrino/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Endocrino/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Endocrino/etiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Endocrino/terapia , Endocrinólogos/historia , Endocrinólogos/tendencias , Endocrinología/historia , Endocrinología/tendencias , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Pandemias , Fenotipo , Rol del Médico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/historia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Sociedades Médicas/historia , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Sociedades Médicas/tendencias , Telemedicina/historia , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Telemedicina/tendenciasAsunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/diagnóstico , Humanos , Anamnesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/terapiaAsunto(s)
Medicina General/organización & administración , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración de la Práctica Médica/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Australia , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric Rheumatology is an orphan specialty in Africa which is gradually gaining importance across the continent. MAIN BODY: This commentary discusses the current state of affairs in the sphere of Pediatric Rheumatology across Africa and offers practical strategies to navigate the challenges encountered in research, models of care, education and training. We outline the establishment, opportunities of growth and achievements of the Pediatric Society of the African League Against Rheumatism (PAFLAR). CONCLUSION: This commentary lays the foundation for establishment of a formidable framework and development of partnerships for the prosperity of Pediatric Rheumatology in Africa and beyond.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Pediatría , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Reumatología , África/epidemiología , Niño , Servicios de Salud del Niño/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud del Niño/normas , Servicios de Salud del Niño/tendencias , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Pediatría/educación , Pediatría/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Enfermedades Reumáticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/terapia , Reumatología/educación , Reumatología/métodos , Reumatología/organización & administración , Reumatología/tendenciasRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Although collaborative treatment by traditional Korean medicine doctors (KMDs) and medical doctors occurs, it is mainly done by referral. As no survey of the general public's preference for the type of collaboration has ever been conducted, we aimed to investigate Koreans' preferences for a collaborative treatment type.The responders were extracted by random digit dialing and then reextracted using the proportional quota sampling method by sex and age. From July to October 2017, telephone interviews were conducted and the participant responses regarding treatment history for spinal or joint diseases, experiences with collaborative treatment, and preferred type of collaborative treatment were recorded.Of the 1008 respondents, 44.64% reported a history of treatment for spinal or joint diseases at a medical institution. The concurrent collaborative treatment system, in which both KMDs and medical doctors are present in one location participating in the treatment concurrently, was the most preferred system among the respondents. Respondents who reported experience with traditional Korean medicine hospitals were more likely to prefer a one-stop treatment approach than those who did not have experience with traditional Korean medicine hospitals (adjusted odds ratio: 1.73; 95% confidence interval: 1.12-2.68). Respondents who were familiar with collaborative treatment but did not report any personal experience with it were more likely to prefer a one-stop treatment approach than those who were not familiar with collaborative treatment (adjusted odds ratio: 1.82; 95% confidence interval: 1.37-2.44).Koreans prefer a concurrent type of collaborative treatment system by KMDs and medical doctors. Therefore, efforts and support are needed to increase the application of the concurrent type of collaborative system.