Cardiovascular toxicity of immune therapies for cancer.

In addition to conventional chemoradiation and targeted cancer therapy, the use of immune based therapies, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T), has increased exponentially across a wide spectrum of cancers. This has been paralleled by recognition of off-target immune related adverse events that can affect almost any organ system including the cardiovascular system. The use of ICIs has been associated with myocarditis, a less common but highly fatal adverse effect, pericarditis and pericardial effusions, vasculitis, thromboembolism, and potentially accelerated atherosclerosis. CAR-T resulting in a systemic cytokine release syndrome has been associated with myriad cardiovascular consequences including arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding adverse cardiovascular effects associated with ICIs and CAR-T.

Acute Pericarditis: Rapid Evidence Review.

Acute pericarditis is defined as inflammation of the pericardium and occurs in approximately 4.4% of patients who present to the emergency department for nonischemic chest pain, with a higher prevalence in men. Although there are numerous etiologies of pericarditis, most episodes are idiopathic and the cause is presumed to be viral. Diagnosis of pericarditis requires at least two of the following criteria: new or worsening pericardial effusion, characteristic pleuritic chest pain, pericardial friction rub, or electrocardiographic changes, including new, widespread ST elevations or PR depressions. Pericardial friction rubs are highly specific but transient, and they have been reported in 18% to 84% of patients with acute pericarditis. Classic electrocardiographic findings include PR-segment depressions; diffuse, concave, upward ST-segment elevations without reciprocal changes; and T-wave inversions. Transthoracic echocardiography should be performed in all patients with acute pericarditis to characterize the size of effusions and evaluate for complications. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the first-line treatment option. Glucocorticoids should be reserved for patients with contraindications to first-line therapy and those who are pregnant beyond 20 weeks' gestation or have other systemic inflammatory conditions. Colchicine should be used in combination with first- or second-line treatments to reduce the risk of recurrence. Patients with a higher risk of complications should be admitted to the hospital for further workup and treatment.

Assessment of Radiation Induced Pneumonitis and Pericarditis in Patients Undergoing Breast Conservative Treatment Using Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the proportion of radiationinduced pneumonitis and pericarditis in patients who have received Hypo-fractionated Radiation along with simultaneous integrated boost technique after breast conservative surgery using a prospective observational study from a tertiary hospital. MATERIALS & METHODS: The incidence of radiationinduced pneumonitis and pericarditis was evaluated in all adult patients with biopsy-proven early-stage unilateral breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by hypo-fractionated radiation with a simultaneous integrated boost technique. Baseline assessments including a six-minute walk test, highresolution computed tomography (HRCT), pulmonary function tests (PFTs), electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography (ECHO) were performed. At three months post-radiation treatment, patients underwent follow-up assessments with a six-minute walk test, ECG and ECHO. At six months post-radiation treatment, patients underwent further assessments with a six-minute walk test, ECG, ECHO, PFTs, and HRCT of the thorax. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 19. RESULTS: Our study investigated the incidence of acute radiation-induced pneumonitis and pericarditis in patients treated with hypofractionated VMAT-SIB technique in 20 eligible early breast cancer patients. The study found that the technique is feasible and achieves encouraging dosimetric parameters, including well achieved ipsilateral lung and heart doses. The reduced treatment time of 3-4 weeks compared to the previous 6-7 weeks with sequential boost was also found to be desirable in resource-constrained settings. The incidence of acute radiation pneumonitis and pericarditis was acceptable and comparable to existing data, with 90% of patients experiencing grade 1 radiation pneumonitis according to CTCAE v5.0. Post-treatment pulmonary function tests showed significant changes, particularly in patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and nodal irradiation. The six-minute walk test and Borg scale also showed a significant positive correlation with pulmonary function tests. There was no significant pericarditis during the follow-up. The study proposes that the hypofractionated radiotherapy using VMAT-SIB is a suitable alternative to conventional fractionation, with acceptable acute toxicities, but longer follow-up is required to assess the impact on late toxicities. CONCLUSION: Our research has shown that hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy with SIB is a safe and feasible treatment for patients with early breast cancer. This treatment method doesn't pose any significant short-term risks to the lungs or heart, and the SIB technique provides better coverage, conformity and sparing of organs at risk. Additionally, patients have reported positive cosmetic outcomes with this treatment. However, to make more accurate conclusions, we need to conduct further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to evaluate the potential longterm side effects of this treatment using VMAT in whole breast radiation.

Purulent Pericarditis as the First Manifestation of Esophageal Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Purulent pericarditis secondary to esophago-pericardial fistula is a serious complication that has been previously reported in patients with esophageal cancer treated with radio/chemotherapy and esophageal stenting. However, the presence of esophago-pericardial fistula as the first manifestation of advanced carcinoma of the esophagus is exceedingly infrequent. We report the case of a 61-year-old male who presented with sepsis, cardiac tamponade and septic shock who was found to have an esophago-pericardial fistula secondary to squamous carcinoma of the esophagus. Emergency pericardiocentesis was performed with subsequent hemodynamic improvement. The drained pericardial fluid was purulent in nature and cultures were positive for Streptococcus anginosus. A CT scan followed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with tissue biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. A self-expanding covered stent was endoscopically placed to exclude the fistula and restore the esophageal lumen. In this report, we discuss some aspects related to the diagnosis and management of this serious clinical entity.

Acute and Complicated Inflammatory Pericarditis: A Guide to Contemporary Practice.

Inflammatory disease of the pericardium represents a relatively common presentation, especially among the young. For the most part, inflammatory pericardial disease can be expeditiously and effectively managed without significant sequelae. However, some individuals present with severe and recurrent illness, representing significant therapeutic challenges. During the past decade, there have been great strides made in developing an evidence-based approach to management of inflammatory pericardial disease, the result of which has been the development of (1) a systematic, protocoled approach to initial care; (2) targeted therapeutics; and (3) specialized, collaborative, and integrated care pathways. Herein we present a review of the current state of the art as it pertains to the diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic considerations in inflammatory pericardial disease with a focus on acute and complicated pericarditis.

Characterization of Brighton Collaboration criteria for myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccine in Korean adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Vaccines are vital for public health, but concerns about adverse effects, particularly myocarditis and pericarditis linked to COVID-19 vaccines-, persist. This study investigates the application of Brighton Collaboration case definition to national vaccine safety data related to post-COVID-19 vaccine myo/pericarditis, utilizing claims under the Korea National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NIVCP). METHODS: This study analyzed 190 medical records of individuals who claimed to have developed myo/pericarditis after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, as reported to the NVICP between specified dates, categorizing cases based on the Brighton criteria for myocarditis or pericarditis. RESULTS: Between 2021-2022, NVICP received 190 cases meeting the Brighton criteria for myocarditis or pericarditis at levels 1, 2, or 3. Most cases fell into Level 2 (70%), followed by Level 1 (29%), and one at Level 3 (1%), with Level 1 cases showing a higher hospitalization rate (87.3%) and a notable proportion requiring admission to the Intensive Care Unit (25.5%). Chest pain and Troponin-I/T elevation were common findings in Level 1 cases, while Level 2 cases exhibited similar patterns but at a slightly lower frequency. Electrocardiogram and echocardiography findings differed between the two levels. CONCLUSION: The Brighton Collaboration case definition proved valuable for classifying and assessing AEFI data, enhancing our understanding of the potential relationship between myocarditis and the COVID-19 vaccine.

Comparative safety profile of bivalent and original COVID-19 mRNA vaccines regarding myocarditis/pericarditis: A pharmacovigilance study.

OBJECTIVES: Bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, which contain two different components, were authorized to provide protection against both the original strain of SARS-CoV-2 and the Omicron variant as a measure to address the COVID-19 pandemic. Concerns regarding the risk of myocarditis/pericarditis associated with bivalent vaccination have been raised due to the observed superior neutralizing antibody responses. This study aimed to investigate the risk of myocarditis/pericarditis following bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccination compared to monovalent vaccination. METHODS: The CDC COVID Data Tracker and the Vaccines Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) were analyzed between December 13, 2020 to March 8, 2023. Reporting rates were determined by dividing the number of myocarditis/pericarditis cases by the total number of vaccine doses administered. Disproportionality patterns regarding myocarditis/pericarditis were evaluated for various COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations using reporting odds ratios (RORs). RESULTS: The reporting rate for myocarditis/pericarditis following original monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccination was 6.91 (95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 6.71-7.12) per million doses, while the reporting rate for bivalent vaccination was significantly lower (1.24, 95%CI 0.96-1.58). Disproportionality analysis revealed a higher reporting of myocarditis/pericarditis following original vaccination with a ROR of 2.21 (95 %CI 2.00-2.43), while bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccination was associated with fewer reports of myocarditis/pericarditis (ROR 0.57, 95 %CI 0.45-0.72). Sub-analyses based on symptoms, sex, age and manufacturer further supported these findings. CONCLUSION: This population-based study provides evidence that bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is not associated with risk of myocarditis/pericarditis. These findings provide important insights into the safety profile of bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and support their continued use as updated boosters.

Hemodynamics of low-pressure cardiac tamponade: An illustrative case report.

A 55-year-old male with acute pericarditis presented with low-pressure cardiac tamponade (LPCT) unresponsive to volume infusion. Subsequent pericardiocentesis resulted in hemodynamic improvement and unmasking of pericardial constriction. This case provides illustrative hemodynamic tracings of LPCT. Additionally, the presence of concurrent pericardial constriction that may indicate a plausible underlying mechanism for the blunted responsiveness to fluid expansion in LPCT. The underlying physiologic processes and the associated hemodynamic tracings are discussed.

Rilonacept use in lupus pericarditis.

OBJECTIVES: Lupus pericarditis affects 22% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), is associated with worse outcomes, and often requires immunosuppression. Rilonacept is an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of recurrent idiopathic pericarditis, but its efficacy in lupus pericarditis is unknown. Here, we report the efficacy of rilonacept in a case series of patients with lupus pericarditis. METHODS: We describe a case series of 4 patients with refractory lupus pericarditis treated with rilonacept in the Johns Hopkins Lupus Center. All patients met the 2012 SLICC criteria for SLE. Refractory lupus pericarditis was defined as recurring or persistent typical pericardial pain symptoms despite standard-of-care treatment including at least one immunosuppressant. RESULTS: Four patients with refractory pericarditis were included. All patients were women, age ranged 26-44 years, 2 patients reported White, 1 Black, and 1 Hispanic ethnicity. Extra-pericardial SLE manifestations were heterogeneous among patients. Only 1 of 3 patient had elevated CRP (not measured in one). Two patients were previously treated with anakinra with initial response, but pericarditis redeveloped in both. Rilonacept led to complete resolution of pericardial symptoms in 3 patients, and partial resolution (40%) in 1, within 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Rilonacept successfully treated lupus pericarditis in this case series. Rilonacept should be considered for the treatment of lupus pericarditis.

Acute pericarditis as the presenting symptom of a case of oesophageal carcinoma.

Oesophageal carcinoma is a globally prevalent form of cancer. Patients with advanced disease often experience progressive dysphagia and weight loss as initial symptoms, but pericarditis is an uncommon presentation. This study describes a young man who presented with pericarditis and was diagnosed with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The patient's diagnosis came after presenting with intermittent chest pain. His diagnostic tests included an ECG showing ST elevation, echocardiography showing pericardial effusion and elevated inflammatory markers. His imaging tests revealed a neoplastic lesion in the lower oesophagus with metastases. He was initially treated as a case of pericarditis, followed by palliative chemotherapy for his cancer. Pericarditis, as the initial presentation of oesophageal carcinoma, is rare. There have only been 19 cases reported and published in the literature. Treatment depends on the stage of the disease. This case emphasises the importance of considering malignancy in unusual presentations of pericarditis, especially in young patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myopericarditis.

A woman in her 30s with a medical history of metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma, currently on pembrolizumab, which started a few weeks ago, was admitted for abdominal pain. During the hospital stay, she experienced sharp chest pain. Troponin was 1885 ng/mL which peaked at 7338 ng/mL. ECG was unremarkable. The echocardiogram showed an Ejection fraction (EF) of 55%-60% and basal-inferior wall hypokinesis. Left heart catheterisation showed no coronary abnormalities. Cardiac MRI showed a non-coronary area of focal T1 and T2 hyperintense signal and transmural delayed gadolinium enhancement in the mid-basal inferior/inferoseptal wall consistent with myocardial damage. Pericardium showed increased thickness and adhesions at the right ventricular outflow tract consistent with pericarditis. Steroid therapy was initiated, and a marked clinical response was achieved. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis and pericarditis is a rare complication associated with a high mortality rate, if untreated. Diagnosis requires a multidisciplinary approach, and early detection is critical to preventing a fatal outcome.

Delayed pericarditis following ethanol ablation of the vein of Marshall in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a case report.

In this case report, we will discuss a 74-year-old female who presented with a chief complaint of abdominal pain, bloating, anorexia, and nausea for four days which preceded after catheter ablation and anhydrous ethanol infusion vein of Marshall (VOM) one month prior. She was admitted and treated as a general patient in the general ward. After hospital admission, a pericardiocentesis was guided by B-scan ultrasonography, resulting in the extraction of 20ml of pericardial effusion, followed by catheterization for drainage. The key takeaway in this report is that anhydrous ethanol infusion VOM may not always be without risks. Hence, during the procedure, it is imperative to carefully administer the appropriate volume of anhydrous ethanol into the VOM to prevent vessel damage and associated complications.

Camptodactyly-arthropathy-coxa vara-pericarditis syndrome and an unusual association with mitral stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Campotodactyly-artrhropathy-coxa vara-pericarditis (CACP) syndrome is a very rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder. It is characterized by flexion contracture of the fifth finger (camptodactyly); noninflammatory arthropathy; decreased angle between the shaft and the head of the femur (coxa vara) and pericarditis. Its association with mitral stenosis has not yet been reported. Hereby we report this unique association with CACP syndrome. CASE: An eleven-year-old girl presented with non-productive cough, dyspnea, and orthopnea. She was diagnosed CACP syndrome at the age of seven and a biallelic frameshift mutation in the PRG4 gene was determined. The physical examination revealed pectus excavatum, camptodactyly, genu valgum, tachypnea and orthopnea. The functional capacity was NYHA III-IV. She had 2/6 soft pansystolic murmur at 4th left intercostal space and a rumbling diastolic murmur at apex. Echocardiography revealed an enlarged left atrium, severe stenotic mitral valve with a mean diastolic transmitral gradient of 22.5 mmHg, mild mitral regurgitation and mild apical pericardial effusion. The patient had mitral comissurotomy and partial pericardiectomy operation. Her post-operative transmitral gradient decreased to 6.9 mmHg and the pulmonary pressure was 30 mmHg. Her functional capacity increased to NYHA I-II. CONCLUSIONS: The main defect is the proteoglycan 4 protein which acts like a lubricant in articular and visceral surfaces. Therefore, the leading clinical feature is arthropathy. Cardiac involvement other than clinically mild pericarditis is not usually expected. Three types of proteoglycans (decorin, biglycan, and versican) are present in the mitral valve. This could be the reason of mitral valve involvement in rare cases as like ours. It is important that these patients undergo echocardiographic examination regularly.

Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Adolescents: Insights From Pharmacovigilance Study of VigiBase.

BACKGROUND: During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, several COVID-19 vaccines were licensed with fast-track procedures. Although these vaccines have demonstrated high immunogenicity, there has been concerns on the serious adverse events (AEs) following COVID-19 vaccination among adolescents. We aimed to analyze comparative safety of COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents. METHODS: In this pharmacovigilance study, we performed a disproportionality analysis using VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global individual case safety report (ICSR) database. To compare serious AEs reported following COVID-19 vaccines vs. all other vaccines in adolescents aged 12-17 years, ICSRs following any vaccines on adolescents aged 12-17 years were included, defining cases as reports with the AEs of interest, with all other AEs as non-cases. The AEs of interest were myocarditis/pericarditis, multisystem inflammatory syndrome/Kawasaki disease (MIS/KD), anaphylaxis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We conducted a disproportionality analysis to estimate reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for each AE of interest, adjusted for sex by using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 99,735 AE reports after vaccination in adolescents, 80,018 reports were from COVID-19 vaccinated adolescents (52.9% females; 56.3% America). The AEs of interest were predominantly reported as serious AE (76.1%) with mRNA vaccines (99.4%). Generally, higher reporting odds for the AEs were identified following COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents; myocarditis/pericarditis (2,829 reports for the COVID-19 vaccine vs. 35 for all other vaccines, adjusted ROR [aROR], 19.61; 95% CI, 14.05-27.39), and MIS/KD (104 vs. 6, aROR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.89-9.88). The reporting odds for anaphylaxis (515 vs. 165, aROR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.02), GBS (94 vs. 40, aROR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.92) and ITP (52 vs. 12, aROR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.59-2.09) were not significantly higher following COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSION: In this study, there were disproportionate reporting of immune-related AEs following COVID-19 vaccination. While awaiting definitive evidence, there is a need to closely monitor for any signs of immune-related AEs following COVID-19 vaccination among adolescents.

Sustained Pericarditis Recurrence Risk Reduction With Long-Term Rilonacept.

BACKGROUND: Rilonacept, a once-weekly interleukin-1 alpha and beta cytokine trap, reduced pericarditis recurrence in the phase 3 study, RHAPSODY (Rilonacept Inhibition of Interleukin-1 Alpha and Beta for Recurrent Pericarditis: A Pivotal Symptomatology and Outcomes Study). The RHAPSODY long-term extension further explored recurrent pericarditis natural history and treatment duration decision-making during 24 additional months of open-label rilonacept treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-four patients commenced the long-term extension, with a median (maximum) total rilonacept duration of 22 (35) months. Individually, 18 months after the most proximal pericarditis recurrence, investigators decided to continue rilonacept on study, suspend rilonacept for off-treatment observation (rescue allowed), or discontinue the study. The annualized incidence of pericarditis recurrence on rilonacept up to the 18-month decision milestone was 0.04 events/patient-year versus 4.4 events/patient-year prestudy while on oral therapies. At the 18-month decision milestone, 64% (33/52) continued rilonacept, 15% (8/52) suspended rilonacept for observation, and 21% (11/52) discontinued the study. Among the 33 patients (1/33; 3.0%) continuing rilonacept (median time to recurrence could not be estimated due to too few events), a single recurrence occurred 4 weeks after a treatment interruption. Among patients suspending rilonacept, 75% (6/8) experienced recurrence (median time to recurrence, 11.8 weeks [95% CI, 3.7 weeks to not estimable]). There was a 98% reduction in risk of pericarditis recurrence among patients continuing rilonacept treatment after the 18-month decision milestone versus those suspending treatment for observation (hazard ratio, 0.02; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the RHAPSODY long-term extension, continued rilonacept treatment resulted in continued response; treatment suspension at the 18-month decision milestone was associated with pericarditis recurrence. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03737110.

Purulent pericarditis caused by methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria.

BACKGROUND: Purulent pericarditis (PP)- a purulent infection involving the pericardial space-requires a high index of suspicion for diagnosis as it often lacks characteristic signs of pericarditis and carries a mortality rate as high as 40% even with treatment. Common risk factors include immunosuppression, diabetes mellitus, thoracic surgery, malignancy, and uremia. Most reported cases of PP occur in individuals with predisposing risk factors, such as immunosuppression, and result from more commonly observed preceding infections, such as pneumonia, osteomyelitis, and meningitis. We report a case of PP due to asymptomatic bacteriuria in a previously immunocompetent individual on a short course of high-dose steroids. CASE PRESENTATION: An 81-year-old male presented for severe epigastric pain that worsened with inspiration. He had been on high-dose prednisone for presumed inflammatory hip pain. History was notable for urinary retention requiring intermittent self-catheterization and asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infections due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). During the index admission he was found to have a moderate pericardial effusion. Pericardial fluid cultures grew MSSA that had an identical antibiogram to that of the urine cultures. A diagnosis of purulent pericarditis was made. CONCLUSION: PP requires a high index of suspicion, especially in hosts with atypical risk factors. This is the second case of PP occurring as a result of asymptomatic MSSA bacteriuria. Through reporting this case we hope to highlight the importance of early recognition of PP and the clinical implications of asymptomatic MSSA bacteriuria in the setting of urinary instrumentation and steroid use.

Efficacy of colchicine in addition to anakinra in patients with recurrent pericarditis.

AIM: Anakinra, an anti IL-1 agent targeting IL-1 alfa and beta, is available for the treatment of recurrent pericarditis in cases with corticosteroid dependence and colchicine resistance after failure of conventional therapies. However, it is unclear if the combination with colchicine, a non-specific inhibitor of the inflammasome targeting the same inflammatory pathway of IL-1, could provide additional benefit to prevent further recurrences. The aim of the present observational study is to assess whether the addition of colchicine on top of anakinra could prolong the time to first recurrence and prevent recurrences better than anakinra alone. METHODS: International, all-comers, multicentre, retrospective observational cohort study analysing all consecutive patients treated with anakinra for corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant recurrent pericarditis. The efficacy endpoint was recurrence rate and the time to the first recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients (mean age 45.0±15.4 years, 65.6% females, 80.9% with idiopathic/viral aetiology) were included. 64 (25.0%) were treated with anakinra as monotherapy while 192 (75.0%) with both anakinra and colchicine. After a follow-up of 12 months, 56 (21.9%) patients had recurrences. Patients treated with colchicine added to anakinra had a lower incidence of recurrences (respectively, 18.8% vs 31.3%; p=0.036) and a longer event-free survival (p=0.025). In multivariable analysis, colchicine use prevented recurrences (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.91; p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of colchicine on top of anakinra treatment could be helpful to reduce recurrences and prolong the recurrence-free survival.

Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis and systems biology approaches to identify the interplay between COVID-19 and pericarditis.

Background: Increasing evidence indicating that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) increased the incidence and related risks of pericarditis and whether COVID-19 vaccine is related to pericarditis has triggered research and discussion. However, mechanisms behind the link between COVID-19 and pericarditis are still unknown. The objective of this study was to further elucidate the molecular mechanisms of COVID-19 with pericarditis at the gene level using bioinformatics analysis. Methods: Genes associated with COVID-19 and pericarditis were collected from databases using limited screening criteria and intersected to identify the common genes of COVID-19 and pericarditis. Subsequently, gene ontology, pathway enrichment, protein-protein interaction, and immune infiltration analyses were conducted. Finally, TF-gene, gene-miRNA, gene-disease, protein-chemical, and protein-drug interaction networks were constructed based on hub gene identification. Results: A total of 313 common genes were selected, and enrichment analyses were performed to determine their biological functions and signaling pathways. Eight hub genes (IL-1ß, CD8A, IL-10, CD4, IL-6, TLR4, CCL2, and PTPRC) were identified using the protein-protein interaction network, and immune infiltration analysis was then carried out to examine the functional relationship between the eight hub genes and immune cells as well as changes in immune cells in disease. Transcription factors, miRNAs, diseases, chemicals, and drugs with high correlation with hub genes were predicted using bioinformatics analysis. Conclusions: This study revealed a common gene interaction network between COVID-19 and pericarditis. The screened functional pathways, hub genes, potential compounds, and drugs provided new insights for further research on COVID-19 associated with pericarditis.

Benefit-risk assessment for the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine (NVX-CoV2373).

A benefit-risk assessment of NVX-CoV2373, a vaccine to prevent COVID-19, was conducted to determine if the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of myocarditis/pericarditis. This analysis used data on myocarditis/pericarditis cases observed in the NVX-CoV2373 clinical studies, real-world data of mRNA COVID vaccine effectiveness against predominant SARS-CoV-2 strains in early 2023, and recent COVID-19 burden of disease data from the United States. The benefits of NVX-CoV2373 vaccination were estimated as the number of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths prevented. The risks of myocarditis/pericarditis cases and related hospitalizations and deaths occurring within 7 days of vaccination were also estimated. In our analysis, vaccination with NVX-CoV2373, per 100,000 vaccinated, resulted in an estimated 1805 COVID-19 cases prevented compared with an estimated 5.3 excess myocarditis/pericarditis cases. The number of COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths prevented were also greater than vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis hospitalizations and deaths. Our analysis indicates a positive benefit-risk balance for NVX-CoV2373.

Pericardial Effusion in Association With Periodontitis: Case Report and Review of 8 Patients in Literature.

Periodontal diseases are well-known background for infective endocarditis. Here, we show that pericardial effusion or pericarditis might have origin also in periodontal diseases. An 86-year-old man with well-controlled hypertension and diabetes mellitus developed asymptomatic increase in pericardial effusion. Two weeks previously, he took oral new quinolone antibiotics for a week because he had painful periodontitis along a dental bridge in the mandibular teeth on the right side and presented cheek swelling. The sputum was positive for Streptococcus species. He was healthy and had a small volume of pericardial effusion for the previous 5 years after drug-eluting coronary stents were inserted at the left anterior descending branch 10 years previously. The differential diagnoses listed for pericardial effusion were infection including tuberculosis, autoimmune diseases, and metastatic malignancy. Thoracic to pelvic computed tomographic scan demonstrated no mass lesions, except for pericardial effusion and a small volume of pleural effusion on the left side. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography disclosed many spotty uptakes in the pericardial effusion. The patient denied pericardiocentesis, based on his evaluation of the risk of the procedure. He was thus discharged in several days and followed at outpatient clinic. He underwent dental treatment and pericardial effusion resolved completely in a month. He was healthy in 6 years until the last follow-up at the age of 92 years. We also reviewed 8 patients with pericarditis in association with periodontal diseases in the literature to reveal that periodontal diseases would be the background for developing infective pericarditis and also mediastinitis on some occasions.