RESUMEN
Laparoscopy for intra-abdominal exploration and tissue sampling is useful in advanced ovarian cancers, in which it is presumed to be difficult to achieve complete tumour reduction in the initial surgery. This is a report of a case of suspected advanced ovarian cancer in a patient, who underwent laparoscopic screening and was later pathologically diagnosed with tuberculous peritonitis. A woman in her 50s visited her local doctor with constipation. Since imaging showed massive ascites she was referred for further evaluation. We initially suspected advanced ovarian cancer due to the presence of massive ascites and multiple peritoneal nodules. However, histopathological examination indicated that the nodules were tubercles, and the patient was subsequently diagnosed with tuberculous peritonitis. It is important to be aware that tuberculosis peritonitis can be misdiagnosed or mistaken for advanced ovarian cancer. Preoperative diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis is often difficult. Tuberculous peritonitis should be considered if intraoperative findings show diffuse nodular disseminated lesions.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Masculinos , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Ováricas , Peritonitis Tuberculosa , Femenino , Humanos , Ascitis , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/diagnóstico , Peritoneo , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Neoplasias Ováricas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugíaRESUMEN
Background. Granulomatous peritonitis is a rare postoperative complication caused by a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to foreign substances. It can be challenging to diagnose owing to its vague presentations, and its possibility is often overlooked. Tubercular peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis are the 2 crucial differential diagnoses that need to be taken into account. However, making a clinical differentiation between these 2 entities is challenging and necessitates a careful histopathological and microbiological analysis. Case Presentation. In this report, we present the case of a 28-year-old female who developed granulomatous peritonitis following a right ovarian cystectomy. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological examination. Conclusion. We must be aware of this rare entity, which, if left untreated, could have serious consequences, and consider its possibility in cases where the patient complains of abdominal pain after any abdominal procedure. We hope to provide insights into the importance of histopathological examination in aiding a confirmatory diagnosis of this entity.
Asunto(s)
Peritonitis , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Peritonitis/diagnóstico , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/patología , Peritonitis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , India , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Granuloma/diagnóstico , Granuloma/patología , Granuloma/etiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Quistes Ováricos/cirugía , Quistes Ováricos/diagnóstico , Quistes Ováricos/patología , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/diagnóstico , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/patología , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/etiología , Ovariectomía/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Peritonitis Tuberculosa , Tuberculosis , Humanos , Femenino , Ascitis/complicaciones , Ascitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Peritoneo , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/diagnóstico , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Introducción: La tuberculosis peritoneal es una enfermedad reemergente, de evolución insidiosa y arduo diagnós- tico. La afectación peritoneal tiene una baja incidencia, afectando por igual ambos sexos figurando entre edades de 35 a 45 años. El alto índice de sospecha debe ser un factor importante en el diagnóstico precoz, para que una vez establecido, se pueda iniciar el tratamiento y disminuir las tasas de morbimortalidad. Descripción del caso clínico: Paciente de 26 años, con clínica inespecífica; dolor abdominal, ascitis y fiebre. Fue ingresada por servicio de medicina interna para abordaje etiológico de ascitis, posteriormente fue abordada como sospecha de cáncer de ovario, se presentó al servicio de cirugía quienes determinaron practicarle laparotomía y cuya biopsia intraoperatoria reporto hallazgos su- gestivos de tuberculosis peritoneal. Conclusión: La tuberculosis peritoneal es una enfermedad poco frecuente, las manifestaciones clínicas pueden sugerir la presencia de una enfermedad tumoral; la sospecha clínica es baja y en muchas ocasiones el diagnóstico es incidenta...(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Neoplasias Ováricas , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/diagnóstico , Radiografía/métodos , Enfermedades Transmisibles EmergentesRESUMEN
Peritoneal tuberculosis is a rare form of tuberculosis which gives a non-specific clinical picture which can be confused with several digestive pathologies. It can also mimic ovarian cancer at the stage of peritoneal carcinomatosis, hence the interest sometimes of a diagnostic laparoscopy which makes it possible to make the diagnosis which is confirmed by an anatomo-pathological study. This is the case of our patient who was initially diagnosed with ovarian cancer and the diagnosis was corrected in peritoneal tuberculosis after a laparoscopy.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Ováricas , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Peritonitis Tuberculosa , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/diagnósticoRESUMEN
It is well known that biological treatment increases the risk of opportunistic infections. Guidelines recommend tuberculosis screening prior to treatment. This is a case report of a woman who had morbus Crohn and developed peritoneal tuberculosis even though she completed a preventive tuberculosis eradication before initiating treatment with anti-TNF-inhibitor. She appeared with ascites and was examined very thoroughly, and eventually a peritoneal biopsy revealed tuberculosis. Tuberculosis is difficult to diagnose, and eradication is no guarantee that tuberculosis cannot relapse during biological treatment.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Peritonitis Tuberculosa , Tuberculosis , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis/prevención & control , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , PeritoneoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to present our experience with the management of 17 patients with ascites who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy, and histologic confirmation of wet ascitic type of peritoneal tuberculosis (TB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and March 2019, 17 patients whose ascites were investigated by a gastroenterologist and who were thought to have non-cirrhotic ascites were referred to our Surgery clinic for peritoneal biopsy. The clinical, biochemical, radiological, microbiological, and histopathological data of the patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy were analyzed retrospectively. Histopathological examination of peritoneal tissue samples in hematoxylin-eosin-stained preparations revealed necrotizing granulomatous inflammation with caseous necrosis and Langhans type giant cells. Ehrlich-Ziehl-Neelsen (EZN) staining was studied with the suspicion of TB. Acid-fast bacilli (AFB) were detected in EZN stained slide. Histopathological findings were also considered. RESULTS: Seventeen patients aged 18 to 64 years were included in this study. The most common symptoms were ascites and abdominal distention, weight loss, night sweats, fever and diarrhea. Radiological examination revealed peritoneal thickening, ascites, omental cacking, and diffuse lymphadenopathy. Histopathologically, necrotizing granulomatous peritonitis consistent with peritoneal TB were detected. While direct laparoscopy was preferred in sixteen patients, laparotomy was preferred in the remaining one due to previous surgical procedures. However, seven were converted to open laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of abdominal TB requires high index of suspicion, and the treatment should be prompt to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with delay in treatment.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Peritonitis Tuberculosa , Humanos , Ascitis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/diagnóstico , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/cirugía , PeritoneoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Tuberculous peritonitis (TBP) is a rare but fatal complication in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). In this study, we aimed to determine the demographic features, clinical features, laboratory parameters, and clinical outcomes of PD patients with TBP and to clarify possible risk factors for mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2084 PD patients from January 1985 to December 2019. The diagnosis of TBP was established by positive peritoneal fluid culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. RESULTS: 18 patients were diagnosed with TBP. The incidence was 2.029 episodes per 1000 patient-years. The most common symptom was fever (94.4%), followed by cloudy effluent (83.3%) and abdominal pain (83.3%). The average peritoneal dialysis effluent (PDE) white blood cell (WBC) count was 172.7 cells/µL. Nine patients (50%) had WBC counts lower than 100 cells/µL and 13 patients (72.2%) had neutrophilic predominant WBC counts. Acid fast stain (AFS) was positive in 7 patients (38.9%). Only 2 patients (11.1%) continued with PD after TB infection, while 10 patients (55.6%) changed to hemodialysis. Seven patients (38.9%) died within 1 year. Significant differences were observed in sex (p = 0.040), the presence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.024), and PD catheter removal (p < 0.001) between TBP patients with and without mortality. However, none of them was a significant factor for 1-year mortality in multivariate Cox regression model. CONCLUSION: Physicians should pay attention to the unusual presentations of peritonitis, especially if symptoms include fever or an initial low PDE WBC count. Catheter removal is not mandatory if early diagnosis and appropriate therapy are available.
Asunto(s)
Diálisis Peritoneal , Peritonitis Tuberculosa , Peritonitis , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taiwán/epidemiología , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/microbiología , Peritoneo , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/diagnóstico , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/epidemiología , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Abdominal tuberculosis (TB) is a "great mimic," and diagnosis remains challenging even for experienced clinicians. While mini-laparoscopy has already been demonstrated to be an efficient diagnostic tool for a variety of diseases, we aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of this technique in diagnosing abdominal TB. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients who underwent mini-laparoscopy at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between April 2010 and January 2022 for suspected abdominal TB. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, radiological findings as well as macroscopic, histopathologic, and microbiologic results were analyzed by chart review. RESULTS: Out of 49 consecutive patients who underwent mini-laparoscopy for suspected abdominal TB, the diagnosis was subsequently confirmed in 29 patients (59%). Among those, the median age was 30 years (range 18-86 years) and the majority were male (n = 22, 76%). Microbiological diagnosis was established in a total of 16 patients. The remaining patients were diagnosed with abdominal TB either by histopathological detection of caseating granulomas (n = 3), or clinically by a combination of typical presentation, mini-laparoscopic findings, and good response to anti-tuberculous treatment (n = 10). Bleeding from the respective puncture site occurred in 19 patients (66%) and either resolved spontaneously or was arrested with argon plasma coagulation alone (n = 10) or in combination with fibrin glue (n = 1). Minor intestinal perforation occurred in 2 patients and was treated conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-laparoscopy is a useful and safe modality for the diagnosis of abdominal TB.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Peritonitis Tuberculosa , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Abdomen , Laparoscopía/métodos , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/diagnóstico , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: China is a region with a high incidence of tuberculosis, and the incidence of IBD has also been rising rapidly in recent years. Differentiating Crohn's disease(CD) from intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) has become a very challenging issue. We aimed to develop and assess a diagnostic nomogram to differentiate between CD and ITB to improve the accuracy and practicability of the model. METHODS: A total of 133 patients (CD 90 and ITB 43) were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was included to determine the independent predictive factors and establish the regression equation. On this basis, the nomogram prediction model was constructed. The discrimination, calibration and clinical efficiency of the nomogram were assessed using area under the curve(AUC), C-index, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve. RESULTS: T-SPOT positive, cobblestone appearance, comb sign and granuloma were significant predictors in differentiating CD from ITB. Base on the above independent predictors, a diagnostic nomogram was successfully established. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of the prediction model are 94.4%, 93.0%, 94.0% respectively. The AUC and the C-index of the prediction model are both 0.988, which suggest that the model had a good discrimination power. The calibration curve indicated a high calibration degree of the prediction model. The DCA and clinical impact curve indicated a good clinical efficiency of the prediction model which could bring clinical benefits. CONCLUSION: A nomogram prediction model for distinguishing CD from ITB was developed and assessed, with high discrimination, calibration and clinical efficiency. It can be used as an accurate and convenient diagnostic tool to distinguish CD from ITB, facilitating clinical decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Enteritis , Peritonitis Tuberculosa , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Nomogramas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/diagnóstico , Enteritis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Objective: Tuberculous peritonitis (TP) can cause multiple infections of surrounding organs and tissues, leading to organ failure and endangering life safety. In this research, the relationship between adenosine deaminase (ADA), NLRP3 inflammasome, and TP and its clinical significance will be deeply explored, so as to provide new directions and reliable reference opinions for future clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods: Altogether, 59 TP patients (research group, RG) and 52 non-TP patients (control group, CG) who were admitted to our hospital from May 2014 to June 2018 were regarded as research objects. Ascites samples of RG before treatment (admission) and one month after treatment and CG before treatment were obtained, and the ADA and NLRP3 levels were tested to evaluate the clinical and prognostic significance of the two in TP. Results: Before treatment, ADA and NLRP3 in RG were higher than CG (P < 0.05), and the sensitivity and specificity of combined detection of the two in predicting TP occurrence were 89.83% and 73.08% (P < 0.05). In addition, ADA and NLRP3 in RG patients were positively correlated with the disappearance time of abdominal pain and ascites (P < 0.05) and had excellent predictive effect on the adverse reactions during treatment (P < 0.05). After treatment, both in RG patients decreased, which was inversely proportional to the clinical efficacy (P < 0.05). Prognostic follow-up manifested that ADA and NLRP3 in relapse patients were higher than those without recurrence after treatment (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The increase of ADA and NLRP3 in TP is relevant to the adverse reactions during treatment, clinical efficacy, and prognosis recurrence after treatment. It can be used as a disease marker to confirm, intervene, and evaluate TP progression promptly.
Asunto(s)
Adenosina Desaminasa , Peritonitis Tuberculosa , Adenosina Desaminasa/metabolismo , Ascitis , Humanos , Inflamasomas , Proteína con Dominio Pirina 3 de la Familia NLR , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/complicaciones , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/diagnóstico , Peritonitis Tuberculosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis remains challenging in clinical practice; thus, in-patients diagnosed with tuberculous peritonitis or peritoneal carcinomatosis were retrospectively enrolled, and diagnostic values of ascitic tumor markers and adenosine deaminase were determined. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with tuberculous peritonitis or peritoneal carcinomatosis were retrospectively enrolled. The pertinent data of 169 patients enrolled were collected. RESULTS: A panel of ascitic tumor makers (CEA, CA15-3, CA19-9) had high specificity (96.83%) and accuracy (94.67%) in the differentiation of peritoneal carcinomatosis from tuberculous peritonitis; and ascitic ADA was a good discriminator between these patients, with an accuracy of 91.72%. Combined use of ascitic tumor makers and ADA (ascitic ADA < 22.5 IU/L or ascitic CEA > 3.65 ng/mL or CA15-3 > 42.70 U/mL or CA19-9 > 25.10 U/mL) performed high sensitivity (99.06%) and accuracy (94.08%) for the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis. In addition, combined ascitic ADA and tumor marker (positive ascitic tumor makers and ADA < 22.50 IU/L) had 100% of the specificity in diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis. CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of ascitic tumor markers and adenosine deaminase showed excellent efficiency in the differential diagnosis between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis, thus these two simple and cost-effective parameters should be determined when tuberculous peritonitis or peritoneal carcinomatosis was suspected in clinic practice.