RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Remifentanil, an ultra-short-acting µ-opioid receptor agonist, is commonly used for anesthetic management due to excellent adjustability. Remifentanil is known to cause sinus bradycardia, however, because it has a direct negative chronotropic effect on the cardiac conduction system and there is an indirect negative chronotropic effect via the parasympathetic nervous system. CASE PRESENTATION: An 8-year-old Japanese boy was diagnosed with acute hydrocephalus due to a brain tumor in the fourth ventricle and underwent emergency surgery. Imaging examination showed brainstem compression. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery were scheduled. Remifentanil was started during induction of general anesthesia, but electrocardiogram showed sinus bradycardia, then Wenckebach-type atrioventricular block, and then complete atrioventricular block. Remifentanil was immediately discontinued, and we administered atropine sulfate. Complete atrioventricular block was restored to sinus rhythm. When remifentanil was restarted, however, the electrocardiogram again showed sinus bradycardia, Wenckebach-type atrioventricular block, and then complete atrioventricular block. Remifentanil was again immediately discontinued, we administered adrenaline, and then complete atrioventricular block was restored to sinus rhythm. Fentanyl was used instead of remifentanil with continuous infusion of dopamine. There has since been no further occurrence of complete atrioventricular block. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first known case of complete atrioventricular block in a pediatric patient with increased intracranial pressure seemingly caused by administration of remifentanil.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Atrioventricular , Hidrocefalia , Remifentanilo , Humanos , Masculino , Remifentanilo/administración & dosificación , Remifentanilo/efectos adversos , Niño , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/inducido químicamente , Hidrocefalia/cirugía , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Anestesia General/métodos , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificaciónAsunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Isoxazoles , Piperidinas , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Isoxazoles/uso terapéutico , Isoxazoles/efectos adversos , Isoxazoles/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificaciónAsunto(s)
Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Humanos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , NitrilosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKis) are effective therapeutic agents against rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, patients having RA with particular risk factors may have a higher incidence of adverse effects (AEs), including major cardiovascular events (MACE) and infections. In this multicenter cohort study, we aimed to clarify the risk factors affecting the drug retention of JAKis in patients with RA. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with RA who received their first JAKi (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib) at our institute. The clinical outcomes, including AEs, were recorded, particularly MACE and serious infections. The drug retention rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors affecting drug retention rates were determined using a multivariable Cox regression hazards model. RESULTS: Overall 184 patients with RA receiving their first use of baricitinib (57.6%), tofacitinib (23.9%), upadacitinib (12.0%), or filgotinib (6.5%) were included in this study. Fifty-six (30.4%) patients discontinued JAKi treatment owing to ineffectiveness (9.2%) or AEs, including infections (21.2%). The overall drug retention rates were significantly lower in patients treated with pan-JAKi than in those treated with JAK1 inhibitors (p = 0.03). In the Cox regression model, the presence of baseline high RA disease activity, use of glucocorticoid and treatments with pan-JAKis were associated with reduced drug retention rates of JAKis (p < 0.001, p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). Pan-JAKi treated patients with high disease activity had significantly lower drug retention rates (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, the drug retention rates of JAKis were reduced mainly by treatment discontinuation owing to AEs. Treatment with pan-JAKis and high baseline RA disease activity were identified as predictive factors for the discontinuation of JAKis. Lower drug retention rates were found in patients receiving pan-JAKis with high disease activity than in those without high disease activity.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Azetidinas , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Piperidinas , Purinas , Pirazoles , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Azetidinas/uso terapéutico , Azetidinas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Purinas/uso terapéutico , Purinas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Triazoles/uso terapéutico , Triazoles/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , PiridinasRESUMEN
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who receive immunosuppressive medications have a heightened risk of infection. The goal of our study was to calculate the pooled cumulative incidence and risk of infection in patients with RA treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). The PubMed and EMBASE databases were queried for randomized controlled trials comparing patients with RA treated with JAKi (upadacitinib, baricitinib, tofacitinib, peficitinib, or filgotinib), defined as the treatment group, compared with control subjects, defined as participants receiving placebo or treatment regimen that was similar to that of participants in the treatment group, with the exception of JAKi. The primary study endpoint was the relative risk (RR) of any-grade and severe infection. The secondary endpoints were RR and cumulative incidence of opportunistic infections, herpes zoster, and pneumonia. The Stata v17 software was used for all data analysis. Results showed that treatment with baricitinib was associated with an increased risk of any-grade (RR 1.34; 95% CI: 1.19-1.52) and opportunistic (RR 2.69; 95% CI: 1.22-5.94) infection, whereas treatment with filgotinib (RR 1.21; 95% CI: 1.05-1.39), peficitinib (RR 1.40; 95% CI: 1.05-1.86) and upadacitinib (RR 1.30; 95% CI: 1.09-1.56) was associated with increased risk of any-grade infection only. Analysis based on type of infection showed a pooled cumulative incidence of 32.44% for any-grade infections, 2.02% for severe infections, 1.74% for opportunistic infections, 1.56% for herpes zoster, and 0.49% for pneumonia in patients treated with any JAKi during the follow-up period. Treatment with specific JAKi in patients with RA is associated with an increased risk of any-grade and opportunistic infections but not severe infection. Close clinical monitoring of patients with RA treated with JAKi is required to establish the long-term infection risk profile of these agents.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Azetidinas , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Piperidinas , Purinas , Pirazoles , Pirimidinas , Sulfonamidas , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Humanos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Azetidinas/efectos adversos , Azetidinas/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Purinas/efectos adversos , Purinas/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster/inducido químicamente , Infecciones Oportunistas/epidemiología , Infecciones Oportunistas/inducido químicamente , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Niacinamida/efectos adversos , Niacinamida/uso terapéutico , Infecciones/epidemiología , Infecciones/inducido químicamente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Triazoles/efectos adversos , Triazoles/uso terapéutico , Adamantano/análogos & derivados , PiridinasRESUMEN
Herpes zoster (HZ) risk is increased in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) therapy. Identifying and evaluating the risk factors of HZ development in patients receiving JAKi therapy would be clinically helpful. We investigated HZ's incidence rates (IR), identified the risk factors, and further assessed their influence on HZ development in RA patients undergoing JAKi therapy. We retrospectively evaluated 249 RA patients who received JAKi therapy between 2015 and 2023. Data regarding clinical characteristics, HZ reactivation, HZ vaccination status, and concomitant medication use were collected. Among 249 JAKi-treated patients, 44 developed new-onset HZ (tofacitinib, 28/142; baricitinib, 6/35; upadacitinib,10/72), with an IR of 5.11/100patient-years. Multivariate analysis revealed significant predictors of HZ development: a long JAKi exposure period, prior HZ or COVID-19 history, and concomitant high-dose corticosteroids use. The interval between JAKi initiation and HZ development was significantly shorter in patients with prior HZ history than in those without (median, 6.5 months versus 33.5 months, p < 0.001), suggesting "biphasic" emergence of HZ. Only one patient who had experienced an HZ episode while receiving JAKi developed recurrent HZ. None of the seventeen patients immunized with the non-live recombinant zoster vaccine developed HZ. Our JAKi-treated patients had elevated HZ risks, a class effect across different JAKi. A long exposure period, prior history of HZ or COVID-19, and concomitant high-dose corticosteroid treatment may further increase the risk. The emergence of HZ shows a biphasic pattern: early HZ development in patients with prior HZ and late development in those without. Key Points ⢠An increased risk of HZ was observed in Taiwanese RA patients treated with JAKi, presenting as a class effect. ⢠Patients with a long JAKi exposure period, prior history of HZ or COVID-19, and concomitant use of high-dose corticosteroids were at high risk of HZ while receiving JAKi therapy. ⢠The interval between JAKi initiation and HZ occurrence was shorter in patients with prior HZ than in those without, showing "biphasic" emergence.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides , Artritis Reumatoide , Azetidinas , Herpes Zóster , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Herpes Zóster/inducido químicamente , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Azetidinas/efectos adversos , Azetidinas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Incidencia , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Purinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/epidemiología , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To explore safety and tolerability parameters for the niraparib individualized starting dose (ISD) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to platinum-based chemotherapy who participated in the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial (NCT02655016). METHODS: The PRIMA protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD based on baseline body weight/platelet count. In this ad hoc analysis, the timing, duration, and resolution of the first occurrence of common any-grade hematologic (thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia) and nonhematologic (nausea, asthenia/fatigue, constipation, insomnia, hypertension) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated by treatment arm in the ISD safety population (data cutoff, November 17, 2021; median follow-up, 3.5 years). RESULTS: Of 733 randomized patients, 255 were enrolled after the ISD protocol amendment and received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment (niraparib, 169; placebo, 86). In the niraparib arm, median times to first events were 22.0-35.0 days for hematologic TEAEs and 7.0-56.0 days for nonhematologic TEAEs. First events resolved in ≥ 89.8% of patients for hematologic TEAEs; for nonhematologic TEAEs, resolution rates ranged from 55.3% (insomnia) to 86.0% (nausea). Median durations of first hematologic TEAEs were ≤ 16.0 days, but for first nonhematologic TEAEs ranged from 18.0 days (nausea) to 134.0 days (insomnia). CONCLUSION: The niraparib ISD was generally well tolerated and TEAEs were manageable. Common hematologic and nonhematologic TEAEs occurred early and first events of hematologic TEAEs had a short duration (≈ 2 weeks) and a high resolution rate. These findings support close monitoring immediately following niraparib initiation and may help inform patient expectations for niraparib safety.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Humanos , Femenino , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Isoquinolinas/administración & dosificación , Isoquinolinas/efectos adversos , Isoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia de MantenciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Pimavanserin, a novel 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, has been approved for the treatment of Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). This study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the adverse events (AEs) of pimavanserin by analyzing the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. METHODS: AE reports related to pimavanserin in the FAERS database from the second quarter of 2016 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were mined. Signal detection methods, including the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM), were employed to identify and classify AEs. RESULTS: The study collected 12,839,687 AE reports, with 30,997 reports primarily suspecting pimavanserin, identifying 166 Preferred Terms (PTs) across 27 System Organ Classes (SOCs). The data showed that males reported more frequently than females, with the highest reporting in patients aged 75 and above. Reports increased over time, with a significant rise in 2023 compared to 2016. Major categories of AEs included hallucination, death, product dose omission issue, and confusional state, with death being notably the second most reported issue. Strong and new potential AEs were identified, including sleep-related issues like somnolence, insomnia, and sleep talking; cognitive and behavioral issues such as alexithymia, belligerence, and aggression; dose-related issues like prescribed underdose and underdose; and other AEs like nonspecific reactions. CONCLUSION: This study reveals potential AEs of pimavanserin, including sleep disorders and cognitive changes, underscoring the importance of careful monitoring and personalized treatment in managing PDP.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Piperidinas , Urea , Humanos , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Urea/análogos & derivados , Urea/efectos adversos , Femenino , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , United States Food and Drug Administration , Bases de Datos Factuales , Antagonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT2/efectos adversos , Antagonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT2/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Teorema de Bayes , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with niraparib in treating patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Methods: Thirty-five patients with pathological confirmed platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who experienced progression after receiving at least two lines of standard treatment were eligible. All of them were treated with anlotinib combined with niraparib between September 2019 and October 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The second endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test, and influence factor analysis was performed using Cox proportional risk regression models. Results: The best overall response showed that partial response was observed in 14 patients, stable disease was noted within 13 patients, and progressive disease was found in 8 patients. Therefore, the ORR and DCR of these 35 patients were 40.0% (95% CI:22.9%-57.1%) and 77.1% (95% CI:62.9%-91.4%), respectively. The median follow-up duration was 18.9 months (6.9-32.2). The median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI:5.35-7.66). Multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS indicated that age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and BRCA mutation status were independent factors influencing PFS (Pï¼0.05). Additionally, the PFS in patients with BRCA mutation who have never received PARP inhibitor treatment was significantly longer than that in patients without BRCA mutation who have been exposed to prior PARPi treatment (15.0 vs 6.0 month, P=0.029). The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were fatigue (85.7%), hematologic toxic (85.7%) and hypertension (74.3%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: Anlotinib combined with niraparib shows a promising efficacy and tolerable safety in platinum-resistant ROC patients.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Indazoles , Indoles , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Quinolinas , Humanos , Femenino , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Indoles/efectos adversos , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Platino (Metal)/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Proteína BRCA2/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune pathology manifested by loss of hair. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and azathioprine in patients with AA and variants. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized controlled trail (RCT) carried out at the Department of Dermatology, Medical Teaching Institute-Lady Reading Hospital (MTI-LRH), Peshawar, Pakistan, patients aged ≥ 12 years diagnosed with AA, alopecia totalis (AT) or alopecia universalis (AU) with minimum 50% scalp hair loss for a period ≥ 06 years were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (Group I) or oral azathioprine 2 mg/kg body weight once daily (Group II). The primary endpoint was Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, evaluated at baseline and 06 months follow-up. Safety was consistently assessed during the study. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients underwent random allocation into either the tofacitinib group (n = 52) or the azathioprine group (n = 52). The mean (SD) age of patients was 20.23 (7.14) years and 22.26 (8.07) years, while the mean (SD) disease duration was 6.59 (4.01) years and 7.98 (4.40) years in in Group I and II, respectively. Overall, 40 (38.5%) patients were adolescents while 70 (67.3%) were male. 52 (50%) had AA, 37 (35.5%) had AT and 15 (14.5%) had AU. Mean baseline SALT score in tofacitinib group was 91.02 ± 10.21 and azathioprine group was 91.02 ± 10.63, which at 06 months follow-up improved to 14.1 ± 24.6 and 63.9 ± 33.9, respectively (difference, 11.5 points; 95% confidence interval, 38.3-61.3, p < 0.0001). Overall, no major adverse effects and no difference among the minor adverse effects in the two groups (04 adverse events for tofacitinib group and 08 for azathioprine group: p = 0.23) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of tofacitinib was significantly higher than azathioprine, whilst both drugs were well-tolerated in patients with AA and variants.
Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata , Alopecia , Azatioprina , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Alopecia Areata/tratamiento farmacológico , Alopecia Areata/diagnóstico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Azatioprina/administración & dosificación , Azatioprina/efectos adversos , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Alopecia/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Niño , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis assessed the effect of baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) on the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) use in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), as well as patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: Phase II (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01786668) and phase III (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03502616) data from patients with active AS were used. Endpoints (weeks 12, 16, and 48), including 20% and 40% improvement in Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS), AS Disease Activity Score with CRP low disease activity, 50% improvement in Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI50), and PROs (pain and fatigue), were stratified by baseline CRP (mg/L) as follows: < 5 (normal), ≥ 5 (elevated), < 10, and ≥ 10. Safety outcomes were evaluated between < 5 and ≥ 5 mg/L subgroups. RESULTS: Overall, 372 patients were included (69.6% ≥ 5mg/L; 50.8% ≥ 10 mg/L). At baseline in the < 5mg/L group, more placebo-treated than TOF-treated patients received concomitant nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or sulfasalazine (SSZ). Week 12 efficacy and PRO responses were generally higher for TOF vs placebo, regardless of baseline CRP. The treatment effect (placebo-adjusted response) at week 12 was generally numerically higher in ≥ 5 mg/L and ≥ 10 mg/L vs < 5 mg/L and < 10 mg/L groups. Incidence rates for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and "all infections" were numerically higher for TOF vs placebo in patients in the < 5 mg/L group, but similar for TOF vs placebo in patients in the ≥ 5 mg/L group. CONCLUSION: Regardless of baseline CRP, TOF was more efficacious vs placebo at week 12. The placebo-adjusted efficacy and PRO responses were generally numerically higher in patients with CRP ≥ 5 mg/L and ≥ 10 mg/L vs < 5 mg/L and < 10 mg/L. The higher concomitant NSAID/SSZ exposure may have improved efficacy responses in the baseline < 5 mg/L placebo group, and ultimately affected the TOF treatment effect. Safety was consistent with previous studies of TOF use in AS, with numerically higher incidence rates for TEAEs and "all infections" for TOF vs placebo in patients with CRP < 5 mg/L.
Asunto(s)
Proteína C-Reactiva , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Espondilitis Anquilosante , Humanos , Espondilitis Anquilosante/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of age on the efficacy and safety of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with a complete/partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study (NCT02655016). Patients in the intent-to-treat population were categorized according to age at baseline (<65 years vs ≥65 years), and progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were evaluated for each age subgroup (clinical cutoff date, May 17, 2019). Safety findings were also evaluated according to a fixed starting dose (FSD) or an individualized starting dose (ISD). RESULTS: Of 733 randomized patients, 289 (39.4%) were ≥65 years (190 niraparib, 99 placebo) at baseline. Median PFS (niraparib vs placebo) and hazard ratios (95% CI) were similar in patients aged <65 years (13.9 vs 8.2 months; HR, 0.61 [0.47-0.81]) and ≥65 years (13.7 vs 8.1 months; HR, 0.53 [0.39-0.74]). The incidences of any-grade and grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar across age subgroups; in the niraparib arm, TEAEs leading to dose discontinuation occurred in 7.8% of patients <65 years and 18.4% of patients ≥65 years. ISD use lowered the incidence of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia events in niraparib-treated patients compared with the FSD (<65 years: 42.8% vs 18.0%; ≥65 years 57.0% vs 26.1%). HRQOL was comparable across age subgroups. CONCLUSION: Niraparib efficacy, safety, and HRQOL were generally comparable across age subgroups, although patients ≥65 years had a higher rate of discontinuations due to TEAEs. ISD use reduced grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia events regardless of age.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Edad , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The identification of oncogenic mutations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has led to the development of drugs that target essential survival pathways, but whether targeting multiple survival pathways may be curative in DLBCL is unknown. METHODS: We performed a single-center, phase 1b-2 study of a regimen of venetoclax, ibrutinib, prednisone, obinutuzumab, and lenalidomide (ViPOR) in relapsed or refractory DLBCL. In phase 1b, which included patients with DLBCL and indolent lymphomas, four dose levels of venetoclax were evaluated to identify the recommended phase 2 dose, with fixed doses of the other four drugs. A phase 2 expansion in patients with germinal-center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB DLBCL was performed. ViPOR was administered every 21 days for six cycles. RESULTS: In phase 1b of the study, involving 20 patients (10 with DLBCL), a single dose-limiting toxic effect of grade 3 intracranial hemorrhage occurred, a result that established venetoclax at a dose of 800 mg as the recommended phase 2 dose. Phase 2 included 40 patients with DLBCL. Toxic effects that were observed among all the patients included grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (in 24% of the cycles), thrombocytopenia (in 23%), anemia (in 7%), and febrile neutropenia (in 1%). Objective responses occurred in 54% of 48 evaluable patients with DLBCL, and complete responses occurred in 38%; complete responses were exclusively in patients with non-GCB DLBCL and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 (or both). Circulating tumor DNA was undetectable in 33% of the patients at the end of ViPOR therapy. With a median follow-up of 40 months, 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21 to 47) and 36% (95% CI, 23 to 49), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ViPOR was associated with durable remissions in patients with specific molecular DLBCL subtypes and was associated with mainly reversible adverse events. (Funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03223610.).
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Lenalidomida , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Piperidinas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/efectos adversos , Adenina/uso terapéutico , Adenina/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/efectos adversos , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (RIH) is a part of a general opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) syndrome, seemingly resulting from abrupt cessation of continuous remifentanil infusion at rates equal or exceeding 0.3âmcg/kg/min. The intricate mechanisms of its development are still not completely understood. However, hyperactivation of the N -methyl d -aspartate receptor system, descending spinal facilitation and increased concentration of dynorphin (a κ-opioid ligand) are commonly proposed as possible mechanisms. Several ways of prevention and management have been suggested, such as slow withdrawal of remifentanil infusion, the addition of propofol, pretreatment with or concomitant administration of ketamine, buprenorphine, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (NSAIDs), methadone, dexmedetomidine. In clinical and animal studies, these strategies exhibited varying success, and many are still being investigated.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Hiperalgesia , Piperidinas , Remifentanilo , Remifentanilo/efectos adversos , Remifentanilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hiperalgesia/inducido químicamente , Hiperalgesia/prevención & control , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Animales , Receptores de N-Metil-D-Aspartato/antagonistas & inhibidores , Propofol/efectos adversos , Propofol/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To assess safety/efficacy of tofacitinib and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients from Latin America (LATAM) in ORAL Surveillance. METHODS: In ORAL Surveillance, 4362 patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥50 years with ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or TNFi. This post hoc analysis stratified patients by geographical location (LATAM, n = 1202; non-LATAM, n = 3160). Incidence rates (IRs; patients with first event/100 patient-years) and hazard ratios for adverse events of special interest were reported. Efficacy outcomes included Clinical Disease Activity Index and American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 responses. RESULTS: Risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease and malignancies were less prevalent in the LATAM cohort compared with the non-LATAM cohort. IRs for patients receiving tofacitinib (combined doses) versus TNFi were 0.54 versus 0.28 (LATAM) and 1.14 versus 0.92 (non-LATAM) for major adverse cardiovascular events; 0.58 versus 0.27 (LATAM) and 1.33 versus 0.95 (non-LATAM) for malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer; and 0.69 versus 0.35 (LATAM) and 0.63 versus 0.33 (non-LATAM) for all-cause death. IRs for nonmelanoma skin cancer and venous thromboembolism were also numerically higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi and in the non-LATAM cohort versus LATAM. Efficacy was similar across treatment groups within each cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events of special interest were generally less frequent in LATAM versus non-LATAM patients, reflecting differences in baseline characteristics, and higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi in both cohorts, consistent with the overall findings of ORAL Surveillance. Our findings emphasize the importance of assessing individual risk factors to guide benefit/risk assessment and treatment decisions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02092467.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Incidencia , América Latina/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors have been increasingly used in ovarian cancer treatment. However, the real-world safety data of these drugs in Japanese patients are limited. This retrospective study included 181 patients with ovarian cancer who received olaparib or niraparib at two independent hospitals in Japan between May 2018 and December 2022. Clinical information and blood sampling data were collected. Regarding patient backgrounds, the olaparib group had higher proportions of patients with serous carcinoma, BRCA positivity, homologous recombination deficiency, and those receiving maintenance therapy after recurrence treatment than the niraparib group. Regarding toxicity properties, the most common reasons for discontinuation in the olaparib group were anemia, fatigue, and nausea, while the reason in the niraparib was thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia caused by niraparib treatment occurred earlier than anemia caused by olaparib treatment. Patients with a low body mass index or who had undergone several previous treatment regimens were more likely to discontinue treatment within the first 3 months. Although we analyzed blood collection data, predicting treatment interruptions due to blood toxicity was challenging. In this study, we revealed the characteristics of patients and the timing of interruptions for each drug, highlighting the importance of carefully managing adverse effects.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Japón , Estudios Retrospectivos , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Ftalazinas/efectos adversos , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
Ibrutinib was the first Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). While producing durable responses and prolonging survival, roughly 20-25% of patients experience dose limiting side effects, mostly consisting of cardiovascular toxicities like severe hypertension and atrial fibrillation. While clinical predictors of BTK inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity have been proposed and may aid in risk stratification, there is no routine risk model used in clinical practice today to identify patients at highest risk. A recent study investigating genetic predictors of ibrutinib-related cardiotoxicity found that single nucleotide polymorphisms in KCNQ1 and GATA4 were significantly associated with cardiotoxic events. If replicated in larger studies, these biomarkers may improve risk stratification in combination with clinical factors. A clinicogenomic risk model may aid in identifying patients at highest risk of developing BTK inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity in which further risk mitigation strategies may be explored.
Asunto(s)
Agammaglobulinemia Tirosina Quinasa , Cardiotoxicidad , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Humanos , Agammaglobulinemia Tirosina Quinasa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Agammaglobulinemia Tirosina Quinasa/genética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/genética , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Canal de Potasio KCNQ1/genéticaRESUMEN
Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a life-threatening condition caused by serotonergic medications. We describe a unique case of SS likely caused by prolonged exposure to propofol and remifentanil alone. A young male presented for vestibular schwannoma resection. Several hours into the case, the patient demonstrated hyperthermia and hemodynamic instability, followed by clonus, rigidity, shivering, and tachycardia after emergence. SS was diagnosed using Hunter's criteria and improved with supportive measures. While the patient endorsed a history of methamphetamine use, his urine drug screen was negative. The possibility of SS should be considered when administering propofol and remifentanil, particularly with prolonged infusions.
Asunto(s)
Craneotomía , Propofol , Remifentanilo , Síndrome de la Serotonina , Humanos , Remifentanilo/efectos adversos , Remifentanilo/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Propofol/efectos adversos , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Síndrome de la Serotonina/inducido químicamente , Craneotomía/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Infusiones Intravenosas , Neuroma Acústico/cirugía , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan, a new medication for acute migraine attacks, is necessary. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational, multi-center, real-world study. A total of 48 patients with migraine (44 females, 44.6 ± 12.9 years old) were included in this study. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (47.9%) reported they were headache-free two hours after taking lasmiditan and were categorized into the responder group. In total, 44 patients (91.7%) experienced at least one side effect within two hours of taking the medication. Dizziness, somnolence, malaise, nausea, and palpitations were reported by 56.3% (n = 27), 45.8% (n = 22), 37.5% (n = 18), 20.8% (n = 10), and 14.6% (n = 7) of patients respectively. Of 48 patients, 20 (41.7%) indicated that they preferred lasmiditan to their previous acute treatment. There were no predictive factors for efficacy. CONCLUSION: This real-world study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan. More than 90% of patients experienced side effects from lasmiditan. Approximately 40% of patients preferred lasmiditan despite the occurrence of side effects.
Asunto(s)
Benzamidas , Trastornos Migrañosos , Piperidinas , Piridinas , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Japón , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas/efectos adversos , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of patients with RA. METHODS: The databases CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, CBM, and PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), all from the time of database creation to April 2024. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (using Review Manager-5.3 software) were independently performed by at least two authors. The network meta-analysis was conducted using R 4.1.3 software. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022370444. RESULTS: Thirty-three RCTs included 15,961 patients The experimental groups involved six JAK inhibitors (filgotinib, tofacitinib, decernotinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and peficitinib) and 12 interventions (different doses of the six JAK inhibitors), and the control group involved adalimumab (ADA) and placebo. Compared with placebo, all JAK inhibitors showed a significant increase in efficacy measures (ACR20/50/70). Compared with ADA, only tofacitinib, low-dose decernotinib, and high-dose peficitinib showed a significant increase in ACR20/50/70. Decernotinib ranked first in the SUCRA ranking of ACR20/50/70. In terms of safety indicators, only those differences between low-dose filgotinib and high-dose upadacitinib, low-dose tofacitinib and high-dose upadacitinib were statistically significant. Low-dose filgotinib ranked first in the SUCRA ranking with adverse events as safety indicators. Only the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib ranked higher among different SUCRA rankings. CONCLUSION: Six JAK inhibitors have better efficacy than placebo. The superior efficacy of decernotinib and safety of low-dose filgotinib can be found in the SUCRA. However, there are no significant differences in safety between the different JAK inhibitors. Head-to-head trials, directly comparing one against each other, are required to provide more certain evidence.