[Polymyalgia rheumatica: What's new?] / Polymyalgia rheumatica ­ Was gibt es Neues?

Currently, only 25% of all polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) patients are referred to specialists. An expert committee has recently recommended confirmation of diagnosis by specialist care. This can help to avoid misdiagnoses and hospital stays and can result in lower glucocorticoid doses.Using ultrasound, magnetic resonance imagining (MRI), or positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), typical periarticular inflammatory changes are observed, especially in the shoulder and pelvic girdle area. However, for clinical use, ultrasound is usually sufficient.In 20-25% of newly diagnosed PMR patients without symptoms of giant cell arteritis (GCA), GCA can be detected through vascular ultrasound. These patients require higher glucocorticoid doses in analogy to GCA therapy. There is growing awareness of a joint GCA-PMR spectrum disease.Glucocorticoids remain the primary treatment. The interleukin-6 inhibitor Sarilumab has recently been approved in the USA for patients with recurrent PMR. Studies have also demonstrated the effectiveness of Tocilizumab in PMR.

Diagnostic accuracy of serum biomarkers to identify giant cell arteritis in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica.

INTRODUCTION: Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) are frequently overlapping conditions. Unlike in GCA, vascular inflammation is absent in PMR. Therefore, serum biomarkers reflecting vascular remodelling could be used to identify GCA in cases of apparently isolated PMR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 45 patients with isolated PMR and 29 patients with PMR/GCA overlap were included. Blood samples were collected before starting glucocorticoids for all patients. Serum biomarkers reflecting systemic inflammation (interleukin-6 (IL-6), CXCL9), vascular remodelling (MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9) and endothelial function (sCD141, sCD146, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, vWFA2) were measured by Luminex assays. RESULTS: Patients with GCA had higher serum levels of sCD141 (p=0.002) and CXCL9 (p=0.002) than isolated PMR. By contrast, serum levels of MMP-3 (p=0.01) and IL-6 (p=0.004) were lower in GCA than isolated PMR. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for sCD141, CXCL9, IL-6 and MMP-3. Separately, none of them were >0.7, but combinations revealed higher diagnostic accuracy. The CXCL9/IL-6 ratio was significantly increased in patients with GCA (p=0.0001; cut-off >32.8, AUC 0.76), while the MMP-3/sCD141 ratio was significantly lower in patients with GCA (p<0.0001; cut-off <5.3, AUC 0.79). In patients with subclinical GCA, which is the most difficult to diagnose, sCD141 and MMP-3/sCD141 ratio demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy with AUC of 0.81 and 0.77, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combined serum biomarkers such as CXCL9/IL-6 and MMP-3/sCD141 could help identify GCA in patients with isolated PMR. It could allow to select patients with PMR in whom complementary examinations are needed.

What Is Polymyalgia Rheumatica?

This JAMA Patient Page describes polymyalgia rheumatica and its signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment.

ANCA-associated vasculitis with muscle involvement mimicking polymyalgia rheumatica.

We report a case of a woman in her early 80s with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis presented as myalgia mimicking polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). She had positive results for the Neer and Hawkins-Kennedy impingement tests, and a normal serum creatine kinase (CK) concentration. At first, we suspected PMR; however, the patient did not strictly meet the classification criteria. Electromyography revealed an abnormal myogenic pattern, and muscle MRI revealed intramuscular and fascial hyperintensity. Moreover, chest CT revealed interstitial lung disease, and test results for ANCAs were positive. We diagnosed the patient with ANCA-associated vasculitis based on the criteria and treated her with corticosteroids and rituximab. Thus, ANCA-associated vasculitis can cause muscle involvement without elevation of the CK concentration and mimic PMR.

The spectrum of giant cell arteritis through a rheumatology lens.

Treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA) aims initially to prevent acute visual loss, and subsequently to optimise long-term quality of life. Initial prevention of acute visual loss in GCA is well-standardised with high-dose glucocorticoid therapy but in the longer term optimising quality of life requires tailoring of treatment to the individual. The licensing of the IL-6 receptor inhibitor tocilizumab combined with advances in vascular imaging have resulted in many changes to diagnostic and therapeutic practice. Firstly, GCA is a systemic disease that may involve multiple vascular territories and present in diverse ways. Broadening of the "spectrum" of what is called GCA has been crystallised in the 2022 GCA classification criteria. Secondly, the vascular inflammation of GCA frequently co-exists with the extracapsular musculoskeletal inflammation of the related disease, polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Thirdly, GCA care must often be delivered across multiple specialities and healthcare organisations requiring effective interprofessional communication. Fourthly, both GCA and PMR may follow a chronic or multiphasic disease course; long-term management must be tailored to the individual patient's needs. In this article we focus on some areas of current rheumatology practice that ophthalmologists need to be aware of, including comprehensive assessment of extra-ocular symptoms, physical signs and laboratory markers; advanced imaging techniques; and implications for multi-speciality collaboration.

MRI of shoulder girdle in polymyalgia rheumatica: inflammatory findings and their diagnostic value.

BACKGROUND: Non-synovial inflammation as detected by MRI is characteristic in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) with potentially high diagnostic value. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to describe inflammatory MRI findings in the shoulder girdle of patients with PMR and discriminate from other causes of shoulder girdle pain. METHODS: Retrospective study of 496 contrast-enhanced MRI scans of the shoulder girdle from 122 PMR patients and 374 non-PMR cases. Two radiologists blinded to clinical and demographic information evaluated inflammation at six non-synovial plus three synovial sites for the presence or absence of inflammation. The prevalence of synovial and non-synovial inflammation, both alone and together with clinical information, was tested for its ability to differentiate PMR from non-PMR. RESULTS: A high prevalence of non-synovial inflammation was identified as striking imaging finding in PMR, in average 3.4±1.7, mean (M)±SD, out of the six predefined sites were inflamed compared with 1.1±1.4 (M±SD) in non-PMR group, p<0.001, with excellent discriminatory effect between PMR patients and non-PMR cases. The prevalence of synovitis also differed significantly between PMR patients and non-PMR cases, 2.5±0.8 (M±SD) vs 1.9±1.1 (M±SD) out of three predefined synovial sites, but with an inferior discriminatory effect. The detection of inflammation at three out of six predefined non-synovial sites differentiated PMR patients from controls with a sensitivity/specificity of 73.8%/85.8% and overall better performance than detection of synovitis alone (sensitivity/specificity of 86.1%/36.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MRI of the shoulder girdle is a reliable imaging tool with significant diagnostic value in the assessment of patients suffering from PMR and differentiation to other conditions for shoulder girdle pain.

Recommendations of the French Society of Rheumatology for the management in current practice of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica.

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for the routine management of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). METHODS: Following standard procedures, a systematic review of the literature by five supervised junior rheumatologists, based on the questions selected by the steering committee (5 senior rheumatologists), was used as the basis for working meetings, followed by a one-day plenary meeting with the working group (15 members), leading to the development of the wording and determination of the strength of the recommendations and the level of agreement of the experts. RESULTS: Five general principles and 19 recommendations were drawn up. Three recommendations relate to diagnosis and the use of imaging, and five to the assessment of the disease, its activity and comorbidities. Non-pharmacological therapies are the subject of one recommendation. Three recommendations concern initial treatment based on general corticosteroid therapy, five concern the reduction of corticosteroid therapy and follow-up, and two concern corticosteroid dependence and steroid-sparing treatments (anti-IL-6). CONCLUSION: These recommendations take account of current data on PMR, with the aim of reducing exposure to corticosteroid therapy and its side effects in a fragile population. They are intended to be practical, to help practitioners in the day-to-day management of patients with PMR.

Did the first description of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica take place in Scotland or in Denmark?

The first description of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is generally attributed to Dr. Bruce. In an 1888 article entitled Senile rheumatic gout, he described five male patients aged from 60 to 74 years whom he had visited at the Strathpeffer spa in Scotland. In 1945, Dr. Holst and Dr. Johansen reported on five female patients examined over several months at the Medical Department of Roskilde County Hospital in Denmark. These patients suffered from hip, upper arms, and neck pain associated with elevated ESR and constitutional manifestations such as low-grade fever or loss of weight. In the same year, Meulengracht, another Danish physician, reported on two patients with shoulder pain and stiffness associated with fever, weight loss, and an increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate. As in the five patients reported by Dr. Holst and Dr. Johansen, a prolonged recovery time was recorded. On reading and comparing these three accounts, we question whether it is correct to attribute the first description of PMR to Dr. Bruce and put forward shifting this accolade to the three Danish physicians.

Concordance and agreement between different activity scores in polymyalgia rheumatica.

OBJECTIVE: The C reactive protein polymyalgia rheumatica activity score (CRP-PMR-AS) is a composite index that includes CRP levels and was developed specifically for PMR. As treatments such as interleukin-6 antagonists can normalise CRP levels, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of PMR-AS, the clinical (clin)-PMR-AS and the imputed-CRP (imp-CRP)-PMR-AS have been developed to avoid such bias. Our primary objective was to measure the correlation of these activity scores. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the concordance between different cutoffs of the PMR-ASs. METHOD: Data from the Safety and Efficacy of tocilizumab versus Placebo in Polymyalgia rHeumatica With glucocORticoid dEpendence (SEMAPHORE) trial, a superiority randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial, were subjected to post hoc analysis to compare the efficacy of tocilizumab versus placebo in patients with active PMR. The CRP-PMR-AS, ESR-PMR-AS, clin-PMR-AS and imp-CRP-PMR-AS were measured at every visit. The concordance and correlation between these scores were evaluated using kappa correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and scatter plots. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were included in the SEMAPHORE trial, and 100 were analysed in this study. The correlation between the PMR-ASs was excellent, as the ICC and kappa were >0.85 from week 4 until week 24 (CRP-PMR-AS ≤10 or >10). Bland-Altman plots revealed that the differences between the CRP-PMR-AS and the other threescores were low. The cut-off values for the clin-PMR-AS were similar to those for the CRP-PMR-AS 86% of the time. CONCLUSION: The correlation between all the PMR-ASs was excellent, reflecting the low weight of CRP. In clinical trials using drugs that have an impact on CRP, the derived activity scores can be used. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTC02908217.

[Polymyalgia rheumatica-A challenge in geriatrics : Interdisciplinary presentation of diagnostics and treatment]. / Polymyalgia rheumatica ­ eine Herausforderung in der Altersmedizin : Diagnostik und Therapie interdisziplinär dargestellt.

Polymyalgia rheumatica is the second most frequent inflammatory rheumatic disease in people aged over 50 years, after rheumatoid arthritis. It is characterized by pain and morning stiffness in the region of the shoulders, hip girdle and neck. It can be associated with giant cell arteritis (CGA). Treatment with glucocorticoids is indispensable. The duration of treatment varies and often exceeds 1 year. The additive administration of methotrexate is an option for saving glucocorticoids. The biologicals tocilizumab or secukinumab are very promising alternatives. The course of treatment should be closely monitored for inflammation parameters, glucocorticoid side effects, pain, visual acuity, depression, activities of daily living and especially related to functions of the upper extremities. The geriatric assessment plays an important role in the management of this condition.

Review of phase 2/3 trials in polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis.

INTRODUCTION: GCA (giant cell arteritis) and PMR (polymyalgia rheumatica) are two overlapping inflammatory rheumatic conditions that are seen exclusively in older adults, sharing some common features. GCA is a clinical syndrome characterized by inflammation of the medium and large arteries, with both cranial and extracranial symptoms. PMR is a clinical syndrome characterized by stiffness in the neck, shoulder, and pelvic girdle muscles. Both are associated with constitutional symptoms. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we assess the established and upcoming treatments for GCA and PMR. We review the current treatment landscape, completed trials, and upcoming trials in these conditions, to identify new and promising therapies. EXPERT OPINION: Early use of glucocorticoids (GC) remains integral to the immediate management of PMR and GCA but being aware of patient co-morbidities that may influence treatment toxicity is paramount. As such GC sparing agents are required in the treatment of PMR. Currently there are limited treatment options available for PMR and GCA, and significant unmet needs remain. Newer mechanisms of action, and hence therapeutic options being studied include CD4 T cell co-stimulation blockade, IL-17 inhibition, IL-12/23 inhibition, GM-CSF inhibition, IL-1ß inhibition, TNF-α antagonist and Jak inhibition, among others, which will be discussed in this review.

Why is polymyalgia rheumatica a disease of older adults? Explanations through etiology and pathogenesis: a narrative review.

Polymyalgia rheumatica is one of the most common inflammatory rheumatic conditions in older adults. The disease is characterized by pain and stiffness in the shoulder and pelvic girdle. Polymyalgia rheumatica is almost always observed in adults over the age of 50. The current article aimed to provide explanations for the age preference of polymyalgia rheumatica by reviewing the literature regarding disease etiology and pathogenesis. Potential factors related to the association between polymyalgia rheumatica and aging include immunosenescence/inflammaging, increased risk of infections by aging, endocrinosenescence, and age-related changes in gut microbiota. These factors and their potential contributions to immune-mediated inflammation will be discussed.

Treatment of Polymyalgia Rheumatica by Rheumatology Providers: Analysis from the American College of Rheumatology RISE Registry.

OBJECTIVE: This study describes the demographics, comorbidities, and treatment patterns in a national cohort of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) who received care from rheumatology providers. METHODS: Patients with PMR were identified in the American College of Rheumatology Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registry from 2016 to 2022. Use of glucocorticoids and immunomodulatory antirheumatic medications used as steroid-sparing agents were examined overall and in a subgroup of patients new to rheumatology practices, the majority with presumed new-onset PMR. In these new patients, multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify factors associated with persistent glucocorticoid and steroid-sparing agent use at 12 to 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 26,102 patients with PMR were identified, of which 16,703 new patients were included in the main analysis. Patients were predominantly female (55.8%) and White (46.7%), with a mean age of 72.0 years. Hypertension (81.2%), congestive heart failure (52.4%), hyperlipidemia (41.3%), and ischemic heart disease (36.0%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. At baseline, 92.3% of patients were on glucocorticoids, and only 13.1% were on a steroid-sparing agent. At 12 to 24 months, most patients remained on glucocorticoids (63.8%). Although there was an increase in use through follow-up, antirheumatic medications were prescribed only to a minority (39.0%) of patients with PMR. CONCLUSION: In this large US-based study of patients with PMR receiving rheumatology care, only a minority of patients were prescribed steroid-sparing agents during the first 24 months of follow-up; most patients remained on glucocorticoids past one year. Further identification of patients who would benefit from steroid-sparing agents and the timing of steroid-sparing agent initiation is needed.

Accuracy of self-reported diagnoses of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis in the French prospective E3N- EPIC cohort: A validation study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of self-reported giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) diagnoses in a large French population-based prospective cohort, and to devise algorithms to improve their accuracy. METHODS: The E3N-EPIC cohort study (Etude Epidémiologique auprès des femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale) includes 98,995 French women born between 1925 and 1950, recruited in 1990 to study risk factors of cancer and chronic diseases. They completed biennially mailed questionnaires to update their health-related information and lifestyle characteristics. In three questionnaires, women could self-report a diagnosis of GCA/PMR. Those women were additionally sent a specific questionnaire, designed to ascertain self-reported diagnoses of GCA/PMR. Four algorithms were then devised to improve their identification. Accuracies of self-reported diagnoses and of each algorithm were calculated by comparing the diagnoses with a blinded medical chart review. RESULTS: Among 98,995 participants, 1,392 women self-reported GCA/PMR. 830 women sent back the specific questionnaire, and 202 women provided medical charts. After independent review of the 202 medical charts, 87.6 % of the self-reported diagnoses of GCA/PMR were accurate. Using additional data from a specific questionnaire (diagnosis confirmation by a physician, and self-report of >3-month of glucocorticoids), and from a reimbursement database (at least two deliveries of glucocorticoids in less than 3 consecutive months) improved their accuracy (91.8 % to 92.8 %). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of self-reported diagnosis of GCA/PMR was high in the E3N-cohort but using additional data as a specific GCA/PMR questionnaire and/or corticosteroid reimbursement database further improved this accuracy. With nearly 600 detected cases of GCA/PMR, we will be able to investigate risk factors for GCA/PMR in women.