Alarms and their limits in monitoring.

The need to incorporate alarms in monitoring systems is related to the growing complexity of monitoring and the large number of variables. For sophisticated alarms, information about the inputs to the patient is of importance; for example, clinical interventions such as drug administration and ventilation readjustment need to be known to the monitoring system. Alarms are triggered by signals or signal features that exceed thresholds. Each threshold must be seen as a level that needs to be set, either manually or automatically. The large number of levels to be set creates an extra workload for the clinician. Approaches to determine such levels automatically are discussed in this article. Most promising seems the multiple signal approach using an expert system. It seems reasonable to expect that information concerning alarm limits, needed for the operation of knowledge-based alarm systems, may come from integrated departmental data bases.

Structured alarm systems for the operating room.

The administration of anesthesia may be viewed as a closed-loop control system consisting of three major components: the anesthesia system, the patient, and the system operator. A monitoring and alarm system during anesthesia should not be limited to only one of the three major components but must include monitoring of the patient, the performance of the anesthesia system, and the action of the system operator. For an alarm system to be successful when an adverse condition occurs, an alarm must be generated and identified, the problem identified and corrected, and the patient stabilized before injury results. The authors describe the characteristics of a structured alarm system that maximizes the time available to correct a potential problem before injury begins, that clearly identifies the cause of the problem, and that prioritizes alarms according to the urgency of the required response. Alarms should be easy to temporarily silence, have built-in alarm default settings to prevent the inadvertant use of settings meant for a previous patient, and have a graphic display that enables the operator to detect problems or trends before an alarm sounds.

Coronary angiography with flashing tomosynthesis.

Thirty-four patients with coronary artery disease were studied with standard 35 mm coronary cineangiography and flashing tomosynthesis, to assess the value of the latter technique to detect stenotic coronary arteries. All occluded vessels and all coronary stenoses seen by cineangiography were also found by flashing tomosynthesis. A correlation coefficient of r = 0.85 (P less than 0.001) was determined between the degrees of stenosis obtained by the two techniques. With flashing tomosynthesis, less contrast medium was needed, the investigation time was shorter, and the radiation exposure markedly reduced. At present, dynamic events, such as collateral blood flow, cannot be evaluated. We conclude that coronary arterial stenoses and occlusions can be reliably evaluated by flashing tomosynthesis. Further technological developments are necessary for the technique to gain clinical acceptance.

Real-time display of radiation field intensity distribution.

A real-time display system has been designed and tested for use with a radiation field monitor. The system uses only pulse and waveform generators, a multiplexer, and an oscilloscope. The display consists of either a three-dimensional representation of the field intensity distribution or a series of simultaneous profiles.