Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 13.856
Filtrar
1.
Acta Orthop ; 95: 219-224, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715473

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Length of hospital stay after hip and knee arthroplasty is about 1 day in Denmark with few patients discharged on the day of surgery. Hence, a protocol for multicenter implementation of discharge on day of surgery has been instituted. We aimed to describe the implementation of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty in a multicenter public healthcare setting. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter study from 7 public hospitals across Denmark. Patients were screened using well-defined in- and exclusion criteria and were discharged on day of surgery when fulfilling functional discharge criteria. The study period was from September 2022 to February 2023 with variable start of implementation. Data from the same centers in a 6-month period before the COVID pandemic from July 2019 to December 2019 was used for baseline control. RESULTS: Of 2,756 primary hip and knee arthroplasties, 37% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35-39) were eligible (range 21-50% in centers) and 52% (range 24-62%) of these were discharged on day of surgery. 21% (CI 20-23) of all patients (eligible and non-eligible) were discharged on day of surgery with a range of 10-31% within centers. This was an additional 15% (CI 13-17, P < 0.001) compared with patients discharged in the control period (6% in 2019). CONCLUSION: We found it possible to perform outpatient hip and knee replacement in 21% of patients in a public healthcare setting, probably to be increased with further center experience.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Dinamarca , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Tiempo de Internación , Alta del Paciente , Hospitales Públicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años
2.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 18: 1743-1754, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803562

RESUMEN

Purpose: Remimazolam tosilate is a novel ultrafast-acting benzodiazepine that has a rapid emergence even after continuous infusion when using flumazenil. So far, relatively few articles are still focusing on the quality of recovery after general anesthesia with remimazolam, especially in day surgery. This study aimed to compare the early postoperative quality of recovery of remimazolam tosilate with flumazenil and propofol in patients undergoing day surgery. Patients and Methods: 137 patients scheduled for day surgery were randomly divided into the remimazolam tosilate or propofol group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of overall recovery assessed with the early postoperative quality of recovery scale (PostopQRS) on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), extubation time, postoperative recovery profiles, and perioperative data were documented. Any adverse events were recorded. Results: The incidence of overall recovery on POD1 was 47.7% in the remimazolam tosilate group and 65.1% in the propofol group (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 1.06; P = 0.072). In general, the overall recovery of the PostopQRS increased over time, and its interaction between time and group was significant (P = 0.003). Among the five dimensions of PostopQRS, there exist statistical differences between groups including emotional state and cognitive recovery. Upon arrival at the PACU, the remimazolam group was more sedated and took longer to recover to a RASS score similar to propofol. The frequency of application of vasoactive drugs during anesthesia was similar in both groups (P = 0.119). Despite rapid emergence with remimazolam after flumazenil reversal, re-sedation (10.8%) or somnolence (60%) in the PACU was observed, and the length of PACU stay in patients treated with remimazolam tosilate was longer than that of the propofol (35 min vs 30 min, P<0.001). Conclusion: General anesthesia with remimazolam tosilate in conjunction with flumazenil reversal permits rapid recovery of consciousness in day surgery, but there was a notable occurrence of re-sedation or somnolence observed in PACU.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Propofol , Humanos , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Anciano , Flumazenil/administración & dosificación , Flumazenil/farmacología , Flumazenil/uso terapéutico
3.
Orthop Clin North Am ; 55(3): 363-381, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782508

RESUMEN

The utilization of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is increasing, driving associated annual health care costs higher. Opting for outpatient over inpatient TSA may provide a solution by reducing costs. However, there is no single set of accepted patient selection criteria for outpatient TSA. Here, the authors identify and systematically review 14 articles to propose evidence-based criteria that merit postoperative admission. Together, the studies suggest that patients with limited ability to abmluate independently or a history of congestive heart failure may benefit from postoperative at least one night of hospital based monitoring and treatment.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Selección de Paciente , Humanos , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios
4.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(5S Suppl 3): S352-S354, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689418

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increasing research has shown that select surgical procedures can be performed in an office-based environment with low complication rates. Within the field of plastic surgery, these findings have mainly been studied in adult populations. However, studies regarding the safety and efficacy of office-based plastic surgery in the pediatric population are lacking. In the present study, we demonstrate that appropriately selected office-based pediatric plastic surgery procedures can be performed under local anesthesia for a variety of common surgical indications with low complication rates. METHODS: A retrospective case series of pediatric plastic surgery patients who underwent in-office procedures under local anesthesia at a single academic institution from September 2014 to June 2020 was performed. RESULTS: Five hundred nine patients were treated in an office setting for various etiologies over the study period. A total of 48.9% of the patients were male and 51.1% were female. Patient age at time of procedure ranged from 24 days to 17 years of age with a median age of 13 years. A total of 778 lesions were treated. There were 10 total complications (1.29%) over the study period with only one surgical site infection that resolved with antibiotic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our work indicates that select pediatric plastic surgery procedures can be performed under local anesthesia with low complication rates.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Anestesia Local , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Femenino , Anestesia Local/métodos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Adolescente , Preescolar , Lactante , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Recién Nacido , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología
5.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 136(Suppl 3): 44-60, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743083

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous coronary intervention is a well-established revascularization strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The safety and feasibility of performing these procedures on a same-day discharge basis for selected patients has been studied in a large number of mostly nonrandomized trials. An up to date literature review should focus on trials with radial access, representing the current standard for coronary procedures in Austria and other European countries. METHODS: The aim of this consensus statement is to review the most recent evidence for the safety and feasibility of performing same-day discharge procedures in selected patients. A structured literature search was performed using prespecified search criteria, focusing on trials with radial access procedures. RESULTS: A total of 44 clinical trials and 4 large meta-analyses were retrieved, spanning 21 years of clinical evidence from 2001 to 2022. The outcome data from a wide range of clinical settings were unanimous in showing no negative effect on early (24 h) or late (30 day) major adverse events after same-day discharge coronary procedures. Based on nine prospective trials a comprehensive meta-analysis was compiled. Using 1­month major adverse events data the pooled odds ratio of same-day discharge versus overnight stay procedures was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.35-01.24; p = 0.19; I2 0%), indicating a noninferiority in carefully selected patients. CONCLUSION: Outcome data from same-day discharge coronary intervention trials with radial access confirm the robust safety profile showing no increase in the risk of major adverse events compared to overnight stay.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Alta del Paciente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Austria , Factores de Riesgo , Prevalencia
6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722907

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: With the rise of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), rapid motor and sensory recovery after anesthesia is crucial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose single-shot hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia (SA) for patients undergoing outpatient arthroplasty. METHODS: Data were reviewed from a single ASC from 2018 to 2020 for two arthroplasty-trained surgeons for all patients with primary arthroplasties that had administration of low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. Data collected from the ASC records were then further evaluated for total spinal block time, length of blockade, time to discharge criteria, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and time to discharge. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-seven patients undergoing 244 primary arthroplasties received SA with low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. The volume of 0.75% bupivacaine varied: 115 patients received 0.8 mL (6 mg), 111 patients received 1.0 mL (7.5 mg), and 17 patients received 1.2 mL (9 mg). Total SA time averaged 144 minutes with a mean of 30 minutes from post anesthesia care unit arrival to motor recovery. The mean time from post anesthesia care unit arrival to discharge criteria was 89 minutes. The average VAS at discharge was 1.44; the average VAS on POD1 was 3.0. No episodes of urinary retention and no reports of transient neurologic symptoms were noted in the study population. CONCLUSION: Low-dose, single-shot hyperbaric bupivacaine SA is an effective option in the ASC for arthroplasty, providing a fast return of motor function, facilitating rapid discharge, and is safe with a relatively low-risk profile.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Anestesia Raquidea , Anestésicos Locales , Bupivacaína , Humanos , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Artroplastia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Adulto
7.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 202, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713324

RESUMEN

Colorectal surgery has progressed greatly via minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic and robotic. With the advent of ERAS protocols, patient recovery times have greatly shortened, allowing for same day discharges (SDD). Although SDD have been explored through laparoscopic colectomy reviews, no reviews surrounding robotic ambulatory colorectal resections (RACrR) exist to date. A systematic search was carried out across three databases and internet searches. Data were selected and extracted by two independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria included robotic colorectal resections with a length of hospital stay of less than one day or 24 h. 4 studies comprising 136 patients were retrieved. 56% of patients were female and were aged between 21 and 89 years. Main surgery indications were colorectal cancer and recurrent sigmoid diverticulitis (43% each). Most patients had low anterior resections (48%). Overall, there was a 4% complication rate postoperatively, with only 1 patient requiring readmission due to postoperative urinary retention (< 1%). Patient selection criteria involved ASA score cut-offs, nutritional status, and specific health conditions. Protocols employed shared similarities including ERAS education, transabdominal plane blocks, early removal of urinary catheters, an opioid-sparing regime, and encouraged early oral intake and ambulation prior to discharge. All 4 studies had various follow-up methods involving telemedicine, face-to-face consultations, and virtual ward teams. RACrRs is safe and feasible in a highly specific patient population; however, further high-quality studies with larger sample sizes are needed to draw more significant conclusions. Several limitations included small sample size and the potential of recall bias due to retrospective nature of 2 studies.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Tiempo de Internación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
Anesthesiol Clin ; 42(2): 281-289, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38705676

RESUMEN

Since 2018, the number of total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) performed on an outpatient basis has dramatically increased. Both surgeon and anesthesiologist should be aware of the implications for the safety of outpatient TJAs and potential patient risk factors that could alter this safety profile. Although smaller studies suggest that the risk of negative outcomes is equivalent when comparing outpatient and inpatient arthroplasty, larger database analyses suggest that, even when matched for comorbidities, patients undergoing outpatient arthroplasty may be at increased risk of surgical or medical complications. Appropriate patient selection is critical for the success of any outpatient arthroplasty program. Potential exclusion criteria for outpatient TJA may include age greater than 75 years, bleeding disorder, history of deep vein thrombosis, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, and hypoalbuminemia, among others. Patient optimization before surgery is also warranted. The potential risks of same-day versus next-day discharge have yet to be elicited in a large-scale manner.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Artroplastia/métodos , Seguridad del Paciente , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/métodos
9.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 165, 2024 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801551

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The use of outpatient surgery in inguinal hernia is heterogeneous despite clinical recommendations. This study aimed to analyze the utilization trend of outpatient surgery for bilateral inguinal hernia repair (BHIR) in Spain and identify the factors associated with outpatient surgery choice and unplanned overnight admission. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of patients undergoing BIHR from 2016 to 2021 was conducted. The clinical-administrative database of the Spanish Ministry of Health RAE-CMBD was used. Patient characteristics undergoing outpatient and inpatient surgery were compared. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with outpatient surgery choice and unplanned overnight admission. RESULTS: A total of 30,940 RHIBs were performed; 63% were inpatient surgery, and 37% were outpatient surgery. The rate of outpatient surgery increased from 30% in 2016 to 41% in 2021 (p < 0.001). Higher rates of outpatient surgery were observed across hospitals with a higher number of cases per year (p < 0.001). Factors associated with outpatient surgery choice were: age under 65 years (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.92-2.11), hospital volume (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.47-1.72), primary hernia (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.71-2.08), and laparoscopic surgery (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.39-1.56). Comorbidities were negatively associated with outpatient surgery. Open surgery was associated (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.09-1.47) with unplanned overnight admission. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient surgery for BHIR has increased in recent years but is still low. Older age and comorbidities were associated with lower rates of outpatient surgery. However, the laparoscopic repair was associated with increased outpatient surgery and lower unplanned overnight admission.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Hernia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Herniorrafia/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , España , Adulto , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 283, 2024 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730489

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an achievement in the field of minimally invasive surgery. However, the vantage point of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologicalprocedures remains unclear. The main purpose of this study was to compare vNOTES with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery, and to determine which procedure is more suitable for ambulatory surgery in gynecologic procedures. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital. The 207 enrolled patients had accepted vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology procedures from February 2021 to March 2022. Surgically relevant information regarding patients who underwent ambulatory surgery was collected, and 64 females underwent vNOTES. RESULTS: Multiple outcomes were analyzed in 207 patients. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test showed that there were statistically significant differences between the vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery groups in terms of postoperative pain score (0 vs. 1 scores, p = 0.026), duration of anesthesia (90 vs. 101 min, p = 0.025), surgery time (65 vs. 80 min, p = 0.015), estimated blood loss (20 vs. 40 mL, p < 0.001), and intestinal exhaustion time (12.20 vs. 17.14 h, p < 0.001). Treatment with vNOTES resulted in convenience, both with respect to time savings and hemorrhage volume in surgery and with respect to the quality of the prognosis. CONCLUSION: These comprehensive data reveal the capacity of vNOTES to increase surgical efficiency. vNOTES in gynecological procedures may demonstrate sufficient feasibility and provide a new medical strategy compared with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for ambulatory surgery in gynecological procedures.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vagina/cirugía , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Tempo Operativo , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Postoperatorio
12.
J Wound Care ; 33(Sup5): S14-S21, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683817

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Family physicians (FPs) in Canada routinely perform in-office cutaneous surgery. There is strong evidence to support a moist wound healing environment, resulting in faster healing times and improved cosmesis. However, the wound care practices of FPs have not been previously studied. We aimed to examine the postoperative wound care practices of FPs after in-office cutaneous surgery. METHOD: An online survey was distributed to Canadian FPs to determine post-surgical wound care practices. The survey examined moist versus dry wound healing and the reasons for these recommendations were explored. Additional wound care practices were also studied. Appropriate statistical analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 573 (91.5%) FPs completed the survey. Just under half (49.2%) of FPs recommended moist wound healing to their patients, while the remaining respondents (50.8%) recommended dry wound healing. The most endorsed reason for both moist and dry wound care recommendations was prior training (63.1% and 65.3%, respectively). Most physicians (57.2%) recommended the use of a cream or ointment postoperatively. While there appeared to be consensus on recommending sun avoidance after cutaneous surgery (77.7%), additional wound care practices varied, including: the use of dressings; cleansing practices; smoking cessation; reduction in physical activity; photoprotection; water exposure; and scar treatment/cosmetic use. CONCLUSION: Almost half of FPs in Canada responding to the survey did not recommend moist wound healing despite strong evidence to support this practice. We also noted a diverse range of postoperative wound care practices after in-office cutaneous surgery. Therefore, these results highlight a critical need for consistent wound care recommendations following cutaneous surgery for FPs in Canada.


Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Cicatrización de Heridas , Humanos , Canadá , Masculino , Femenino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos , Adulto , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Médicos de Familia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios
14.
World J Surg ; 48(1): 104-109, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686771

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Finite hospital resources has required a closer look at resource allocation. This has prompted a shift toward same day surgeries and a focus on reducing hospital readmissions. Following the institution of a same day discharge protocol for mastectomy and mastectomy with immediate reconstruction, we sought to assess differences in the length of stay and readmission rates. METHODS: This retrospective review evaluates all cases of mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction performed at a single high-volume center between June 2019 and March 2021. Average length of stay, 30-day readmission rates, Anesthesia Society Assessment class, and type of immediate reconstruction were assessed. Autologous reconstructions were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients underwent mastectomy with or without reconstruction (n = 148 pre protocol and n = 265 during protocol) between June 2019 and March 2021. Of those 413 patients, 180 underwent reconstruction (n = 62 pre protocol and n = 118 during protocol). The average length of stay after mastectomy following the implementation of the same day discharge protocol was decreased at 0.6 days (n = 265) compared to preimplementation at 1.02 days (n = 148), p < 0.001. The 30-day readmission rate was not significant between the groups, p = 0.13. A total of 180 patients underwent immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. The average length of stay after mastectomy with immediate reconstruction following implementation of the same day discharge protocol was shorter than preimplementation at 1.05 days preimplementation (n = 62) versus 0.58 days following implementation (n = 118), p < 0.001; this finding was significant for both prepectoral and subpectoral implants, p < 0.001. There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission rates between the groups with immediate reconstruction, p = 0.34. CONCLUSION: Same day discharge for mastectomy with reconstruction is as safe as the more widely recognized same day discharge practice for patients with mastectomy alone.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Tiempo de Internación , Mastectomía , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Adulto , Mamoplastia/métodos , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Protocolos Clínicos , Implantación de Mama/métodos
15.
J Clin Anesth ; 95: 111451, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574504

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Management of pain after foot and ankle surgery remains a concern for patients and healthcare professionals. This study determined the effectiveness of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade, compared to standard of care, on overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS) in patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery. We hypothesized that usage of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade is non-inferior to standard of care. DESIGN: Single center, randomized, non-inferiority trial. SETTING: Tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: Patients were enrolled if ≥18 years and scheduled for elective inpatient foot or ankle surgery. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade or standard of care. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the difference in OBAS, which includes pain, side effects of analgesics, and patient satisfaction, measured daily from the first to the third day after surgery. A non-inferiority margin of 2 was set as the upper limit for the 90% confidence interval of the difference in OBAS score. Mixed-effects modeling was employed to analyze differences in OBAS scores over time. Secondary outcome was the difference in opioid consumption. MAIN RESULTS: Patients were randomized to standard of care (n = 22), or ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade (n = 22). Analyzing the first three postoperative days, the OBAS was significantly lower over time in the ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade group compared to standard of care, demonstrating non-inferiority (-1.9 points, 90% CI -3.1 to -0.7). During the first five postoperative days, patients with ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade consumed significantly fewer opioids over time compared to standard of care (-8.7 oral morphine milligram equivalents; 95% CI -16.1 to -1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade is non-inferior to standard of care with single shot popliteal sciatic nerve blockade on patient-reported overall benefit of analgesia.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Tobillo , Pie , Bloqueo Nervioso , Dolor Postoperatorio , Nervio Ciático , Humanos , Masculino , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Femenino , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tobillo/cirugía , Pie/cirugía , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Satisfacción del Paciente , Anciano , Dimensión del Dolor , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Países Bajos
16.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 52(3): 168-179, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649297

RESUMEN

Optimal pain relief in day-case surgery is imperative to patient comfort and timely discharge from hospital. Short-acting opioids are commonly used for analgesia in modern anaesthesia, allowing rapid recovery after surgery. Plasma concentration fluctuations from repeated dosing of short-acting opioids can cause patients to oscillate between analgesia with potential adverse effects, and inadequate analgesia requiring rescue dosing. Methadone's unique pharmacology may offer effective and sustained analgesia with less opioid consumption, potentially reducing adverse effects. Using a double-blind, randomised controlled trial, we compared post-anaesthesia care unit opioid consumption between day-case gynaecological laparoscopy patients who received either intravenous methadone (10 mg), or short-acting opioids intraoperatively. The primary outcome was post-anaesthesia care unit opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption, discharge opioid consumption, pain scores (0-10) until discharge, adverse effects (respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting, excess sedation), and rate of admission. Seventy patients were randomly assigned. Patients who received methadone consumed on average 9.44 mg fewer oral morphine equivalents in the post-anaesthesia care unit than the short-acting group (18.02 mg vs 27.46 mg, respectively, 95% confidence interval 0.003 to 18.88, P = 0.050) and experienced lower postoperative pain scores at every time point, although absolute differences were small. There was no evidence of lower hospital or discharge opioid consumption. No significant differences between the methadone and short-acting groups in other outcomes were identified: respiratory depression 41.2% versus 31.4%, Padjusted >0.99; postoperative nausea and vomiting 29.4% versus 42.9%, Padjusted >0.99; overnight admission 17.7% versus 11.4%, Padjusted >0.99; excess sedation 8.82% versus 8.57%, Padjusted >0.99. This study provides evidence that, although modestly, methadone can reduce post-anaesthesia care unit opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores after day-case gynaecological laparoscopy. There were no significant differences in any secondary outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Laparoscopía , Metadona , Dolor Postoperatorio , Humanos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Laparoscopía/métodos , Metadona/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos
17.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 25(3): 240-246, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588520

RESUMEN

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common inpatient and outpatient surgical procedures performed in the United States and is predicted to increase 401% by 2040. Surgical site infections (SSIs) at an incidence rate of approximately 2% are costly post-operative complications in TKA. Intra-operative surgical irrigants are used to decrease contaminating microbial bioburden within the surgical site to prevent SSI. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of a novel surgical irrigant called XPERIENCE® Advanced Surgical Irrigation (XP; Next Science, Jacksonville, FL) on SSI incidence in primary TKA performed at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC). Patients and Methods: Primary TKAs were performed at a free-standing ASC. The novel surgical irrigant was used intra-operatively to rinse away debris and micro-organisms from the surgical site. Retrospective data collation included SSI rates, complication rates, and re-admissions due to SSI within 90 days of index surgery. Results: Among the 524 primary TKA surgeries, one peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) was diagnosed within 90 days of index surgery and one superficial incisional SSI was diagnosed within 30 days of index surgery. The PJI was attributed to an exogenously acquired upper respiratory tract infection rather than due to the failure of intra-operative regimes. The 0.19% PJI incidence rate indicated significant efficacy of XP in decreasing PJI. An overall complication rate of 7.82% was noted with none of the complications associated with usage of the novel surgical irrigant. Conclusions: XPERIENCE is a promising intra-operative antimicrobial irrigant that can be easily incorporated into a broader infection prevention strategy.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos
18.
Am J Manag Care ; 30(4): 179-184, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38603532

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To quantify differences in prices paid and procedural complications incurred in hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) and freestanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). STUDY DESIGN: Observational study using deidentified 2019-2020 insurance claims from Blue Cross Blue Shield insurance plans nationally, with information on prices paid and complications incurred for colonoscopy, knee or shoulder arthroscopy, and cataract removal surgery. METHODS: The data include 1,662,183 patients who received a colonoscopy, 53.5% of whom were treated in HOPDs; 259,200 patients who underwent arthroscopy, 61.0% of whom were treated in HOPDs; and 173,664 patients who had cataract removal surgery, 34.7% of whom were treated in HOPDs. Multivariable linear regression methods were used to identify the associations between HOPD and ASC site of care, prices, and complications after adjusting for patient demographics, risk, and geographic market location. RESULTS: After adjusting for patient characteristics, risk, and geographic market location, prices paid in HOPDs were 54.9% higher than those charged in ASCs for colonoscopy (95% CI, 53.6%-56.1%), 44.4% higher for arthroscopy (95% CI, 43.0%-45.8%), and 44.0% higher for cataract removal surgery (95% CI, 42.9%-45.5%). Adjusted rates of complications were slightly higher in HOPDs than ASCs for colonoscopy over a 90-day interval but similar over the 7- and 30-day intervals. Rates were statistically and clinically similar between the 2 sites of care for arthroscopy and cataract removal. CONCLUSIONS: The higher prices charged in HOPDs for the 3 ambulatory procedures were not balanced by better quality-as measured by rates of procedural complications-compared with procedures performed in nonhospital ASCs.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Catarata , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Hospitales , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
Acta Orthop Belg ; 90(1): 63-66, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669651

RESUMEN

Ulnar nerve release is often performed under general anaesthesia. Wide Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) is a new anaesthetic method increasingly used by hand surgeons in an outpatient setting. It has advantages such as the possibility to shift surgical interventions out of the regular surgical theatre settings into an outpatient clinical setting, no risk of complications or side effects resulting from regional and general anesthesia and decreased costs. The use of WALANT has not been investigated extensively in elbow surgery. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes after ulnar nerve release under WALANT 27 patients with ulnar nerve release for cubital tunnel syndrome were included. The primary outcome was the presence of (remaining) symptoms after ulnar nerve release. Data was extracted from medical records. 13 out of 27 patients had (mild) remaining symptoms after ulnar nerve release, and 1 complication (superficial wound infection) was seen. Ulnar nerve release under WALANT is safe and effective in patients with primary ulnar nerve entrapment that have failed conservative therapy.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locales , Síndrome del Túnel Cubital , Humanos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome del Túnel Cubital/cirugía , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Nervio Cubital/cirugía , Torniquetes , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
World J Surg ; 48(5): 1266-1270, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38441293

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: One third of South African children live in households with no employed adult. Telemedicine may save patients and the strained public health sector significant resources. We aimed to determine the safety and benefits of telephonic post-operative follow-up of patients who presented for day case surgery at CHBAH from 1 January-31 March 2023. METHODS: A prospective descriptive study on patients undergoing day case surgery was performed. Healthy patients greater than 6 years old whose caregivers spoke English and had access to a smartphone were included. Data on the total number of telephonic follow-ups, operative complications, need for in person review, satisfaction with telephonic follow-up, and savings in transport costs and time by avoiding in person follow-up were collected. RESULTS: A total of 38 telephonic follow-ups were performed. Six (15.8%) patients presented for in person review due to the detection of major complications (2, 5.3%), minor complications (2, 5.3%), and parental concern (2, 5.3%) during telephonic follow-up. All caregivers reported being satisfied with telephonic follow-up. Total savings in transport costs were R4452 (US $ 248.45). The majority of patients (29, 76.3%) had at least one unemployed parent. Seven caregivers (18.4%) avoided taking paid leave and 2 (5.3%) unpaid leave from work due to follow-up being performed telephonically. CONCLUSIONS: Innovation is necessary in order to expand access to safe, affordable, and timely care. In this selected group, telephonic follow-up was a safe, acceptable, and cost-effective intervention. The expansion of such a program has the potential for significant savings for patients and the healthcare system.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Telemedicina , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/economía , Sudáfrica , Telemedicina/economía , Teléfono , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adolescente , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Cuidados Posteriores/economía , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA