Immunosuppressive treatment results in patients with primary IgA nephropathy in Turkiye; the data from TSN-GOLD working group.

BACKGROUND: Immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) treatment consists of maximal supportive care and, for high-risk individuals, immunosuppressive treatment (IST). There are conflicting results regarding IST. Therefore, we aimed to investigate IST results among IgAN patients in Turkiye. METHOD: The data of 1656 IgAN patients in the Primary Glomerular Diseases Study of the Turkish Society of Nephrology Glomerular Diseases Study Group were analyzed. A total of 408 primary IgAN patients treated with IST (65.4% male, mean age 38.4 ± 12.5 years, follow-up 30 (3-218) months) were included and divided into two groups according to treatment protocols (isolated corticosteroid [CS] 70.6% and combined IST 29.4%). Treatment responses, associated factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Remission (66.7% partial, 33.7% complete) was achieved in 74.7% of patients. Baseline systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and proteinuria levels were lower in responsives. Remission was achieved at significantly higher rates in the CS group (78% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.016). Partial remission was the prominent remission type. The remission rate was significantly higher among patients with segmental sclerosis compared to those without (60.4% vs. 49%, p = 0.047). In the multivariate analysis, MEST-C S1 (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.08-1.89, p = 0.013), MEST-C T1 (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.91, p = 0.008) and combined IST (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.91, p = 0.009) were found to be significant regarding remission. CONCLUSION: CS can significantly improve remission in high-risk Turkish IgAN patients, despite the reliance on non-quantitative endpoints for favorable renal outcomes. Key predictors of remission include baseline proteinuria and specific histological markers. It is crucial to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of immunosuppressive therapy for these patients.

Investigating the use of finerenone in children with chronic kidney disease and proteinuria: design of the FIONA and open-label extension studies.

INTRODUCTION: Proteinuria is a modifiable risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression in children. Finerenone, a selective, non-steroidal, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) has been approved to treat adults with CKD associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) following results from the phase III clinical trials FIDELIO-DKD (NCT02540993) and FIGARO-DKD (NCT02545049). In a pre-specified pooled analysis of both studies (N = 13,026), finerenone was shown to have an acceptable safety profile and was efficacious in decreasing the risk of adverse kidney and cardiovascular outcomes and of proteinuria. OBJECTIVE: FIONA and the associated open-label extension (OLE) study aim to demonstrate that combining finerenone with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) is safe, well-tolerated, and effective in sustainably reducing urinary protein excretion in children with CKD and proteinuria. DESIGN: FIONA (NCT05196035; Eudra-CT: 2021-002071-19) is a randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase III study of 6 months' duration in approximately 219 pediatric patients. Patients must have a clinical diagnosis of CKD (an eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 if ≥ 1 to < 18 years or a serum creatinine level ≤ 0.40 mg/dL for infants 6 months to < 1 year) with significant proteinuria despite ACEi or ARB usage. The primary objective is to demonstrate that finerenone, added to an ACEi or ARB, is superior to placebo in reducing urinary protein excretion. FIONA OLE (NCT05457283; Eudra-CT: 2021-002905-89) is a single-arm, open-label study, enrolling participants who have completed FIONA. The primary objective of FIONA OLE is to provide long-term safety data. FIONA has two primary endpoints: urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) reduction of ≥ 30% from baseline to day 180 and percent change in UPCR from baseline to day 180. A sample size of 198 participants (aged 2 to < 18 years) in FIONA will provide at least 80% power to reject the null hypothesis of either of the two primary endpoints. CONCLUSION: FIONA is evaluating the use of finerenone in children with CKD and proteinuria. Should safety, tolerability, and efficacy be demonstrated, finerenone could become a useful additional therapeutic agent in managing proteinuria and improving kidney outcomes in children with CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05196035. Registered on 19 January 2022.

Proteinuria frequency and subsequent renal dysfunction in bevacizumab-treated patients: a single center, retrospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Proteinuria is a common adverse event observed during treatment with antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies. Proteinuria is a risk factor for renal dysfunction and cardiovascular complications in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, the association between anti-VEGF antibody-induced proteinuria and renal dysfunction or cardiovascular complications remains unclear. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included patients with cancer that were treated with bevacizumab (BV) at Kyoto University Hospital (Kyoto, Japan) between January 2006 and March 2018. Adverse event rates were compared between patients who developed qualitative ≥ 2 + proteinuria and those who developed < 1 + proteinuria. Adverse events were defined as renal dysfunction (i.e., ≥ 57% decrease in the eGFR, compared to the rate at the initial treatment) and hospitalization due to BV-associated cardiovascular complications and other adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 734 patients were included in this analysis. Renal dysfunction was more common in patients with ≥ 2 + proteinuria than in those with < 1 + proteinuria (13/199, 6.5% vs. 12/535, 2.3%). Seven of these 13 patients with ≥ 2 + proteinuria had transient reversible renal dysfunction. Only four (2.0%) patients had BV-associated renal dysfunction. Of the 734 patients, six patients, 16 patients, and 13 patients were hospitalized because of the adverse events of cardiovascular complications, thromboembolisms, and cerebrovascular complications, respectively. No relationship was observed between these adverse events and proteinuria. CONCLUSION: BV treatment-induced proteinuria was not associated with renal dysfunction or other adverse events. Continuing BV with caution is a possible treatment option, even after proteinuria develops, in patients with cancer and a limited prognosis.

Machine learning application identifies plasma markers for proteinuria in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with Bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Proteinuria is a common complication after the application of bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and severe proteinuria can lead to discontinuation of the drug. There is a lack of sophisticated means to predict bevacizumab-induced proteinuria, so the present study aims to predict bevacizumab-induced proteinuria using peripheral venous blood samples. METHODS: A total of 122 subjects were enrolled and underwent pre-treatment plasma markers, and we followed them for six months with proteinuria as the endpoint event. We then analyzed the clinical features and plasma markers for grade ≥ 2 proteinuria occurrence using machine learning to construct a model with predictive utility. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen subjects were included in the statistical analysis. We found that high baseline systolic blood pressure, low baseline HGF, high baseline ET1, high baseline MMP2, and high baseline ACE1 were risk factors for the development of grade ≥ 2 proteinuria in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received bevacizumab. Then, we constructed a support vector machine model with a sensitivity of 0.889, a specificity of 0.918, a precision of 0.615, and an F1 score of 0.727. CONCLUSION: We constructed a machine learning model for predicting grade ≥ 2 bevacizumab-induced proteinuria, which may provide proteinuria risk assessment for applying bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Clinicopathological features of kidney injury in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy has increasingly become a promising strategy in various malignancies. However, the combination might be associated with increased risk of nephrotoxicity. METHODS: We retrospectively recruited patients who suffered kidney injury and received renal biopsy after anti-VEGF/ICPi mono- or combination therapy and divided them into three groups: anti-VEGF monotherapy, ICPi monotherapy and combination therapy. Clinical and histopathological features of three groups were analysed. All patients were followed-up for 3 months after biopsy, with or without glucocorticoid treatment, and renal outcome were compared. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were enrolled. Eighteen patients received anti-VEGF monotherapy, 12 received ICPi monotherapy and 16 received combined treatment of anti-VEGF and ICPi. Proteinuria level of anti-VEGF group, ICPi group and combination group were 4.07±3.17 g/day, 0.60±0.61 g/day and 2.05±2.50 g/day, respectively (p=0.002). The peak serum creatinine level of combination group (1.75±0.77 mg/dL) was also in between ICPi group (2.79±0.90 mg/dL) and anti-VEGF group (1.34±0.60 mg/dL) (p<0.001). Multiple histopathological patterns involving glomerulus, tubulointerstitium and vessel existed in the majority of cases in combination group (68.8%). Renal complete and partial recovery rate of combination therapy were also in between monotherapy (57.1% vs 40.0% in anti-VEGF group, 100.0% in ICPi group, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Kidney injury in patients treated with combination therapy of ICPi and anti-VEGF shows hybrid pathological patterns and intermediate clinical features compared with monotherapy. Cohorts with larger sample and better design, as well as basic research, are needed to elucidate the mechanism of 'protection' effect of combination anti-cancer therapy to renal function.

[IgA nephropathy]. / IgA-Nephropathie.

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most frequent primary form of glomerulonephritis. The origin of IgAN is only partially understood and appears to involve the occurrence of IgA1, which is normally secreted by mucous membranes, in the circulation followed by its glomerular deposition and inflammatory changes. Clinically, IgAN mostly follows an inapparent course and the disease is often only first diagnosed by kidney biopsy when kidney function disorders are already manifested. Key prognostic indicators include the extent of proteinuria and the already manifested evidence of irreversible kidney damage. Treatment includes supportive measures. The effectiveness of high-dose systemic corticosteroid treatment in European patients is uncertain and controversial due to the adverse side effects. Nefecon (encapsulated budesonide) is the first specific drug licensed for treatment of high risk IgAN patients. A number of further approaches are currently in clinical trials.

Renal Implications of Long-Term Systemic Bevacizumab for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab is a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor that is used off-label for select cases of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) that are severe, involve the distal airway or lung parenchyma, and refractory to other forms of adjuvant therapy. However, there is limited safety data for the use of bevacizumab in children and VEGF inhibitors are reported to have a range of adverse renal effects, including hypertension, proteinuria, and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: This report describes a case of severe juvenile-onset RRP that had an exceptionally high operative burden that was refractory to several adjuvant treatment strategies (including intralesional cidofovir and subcutaneous pegylated interferon). Bevacizumab treatment resulted in a dramatic and sustained improvement in disease control over a 5-year period. However, after 3 years of treatment, the patient developed hypertension and proteinuria and was found to have evidence of a glomerular TMA on kidney biopsy. These complications were successfully managed with a reduction in bevacizumab frequency and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians caring for children treated with VEGF inhibitors should be aware of the potential renal complications and their management.

Proteinuria reduction with SGLT2 inhibitors in a patient treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor lenvatinib.

We describe the case of a 66-year-old woman treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor Lenvatinib for thyroid carcinoma who had persistent proteinuria above 2 g/24 h despite maximal dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. We initiated a treatment with SGLT2 inhibitor Dapagliflozin. Three months after Dapagliflozin initiation, her proteinuria decreased to 1 g/24 h, and after 6 months of follow-up was 0.6 g/24 h. To our knowledge, this is the first case of successful proteinuria reduction with SGLT2i in a patient treated with Lenvatinib. Specific renal effects of SGLT2i seem promising and their effects on tyrosine kinase inhibitor renal adverse effects need to be validated in clinical trials involving cancer patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Apatinib Combined with Chemotherapy as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: At present, there are several studies on low-dose apatinib combined with chemotherapy as a second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC), but the conclusions are controversial. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib combined with chemotherapy as a second-line treatment of AGC. METHODS: Nine databases were searched for records on apatinib combined with chemotherapy in treating AGC from inception to June 2022. The observation group received low-dose apatinib combined with chemotherapy, while the controls received chemotherapy alone or other non-placebo treatments. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. The relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used as effect sizes. RESULTS: Eight studies involving 679 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the observation group was superior to the controls in terms of ORR (RR = 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.81, p = 0.02), DCR (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.20-1.53, p < 0.001), OS (WMD = 4.72, 95% CI: 0.71-8.72, p < 0.001), and PFS (WMD = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.7-3.63, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in adverse events of any grade except hypertension (RR = 2.82, 95% CI: 2.07-3.84, p < 0.001), hand-mouth syndrome (RR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.84-2.48, p < 0.001), and proteinuria (RR = 3.63, 95% CI: 2.31-5.7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Low-dose apatinib combined with chemotherapy as a second-line therapy is more effective in improving the efficacy of AGC compared to chemotherapy alone. However, this option has the potential to increase the risk of hypertension, hand-mouth syndrome, and proteinuria.

Effects of Low-Osmolar Contrast Media on Long-Term Renal Impairment After Coronary Angiography: Iohexol Versus Iopromide.

To investigate the long-term effects of 2 commonly used low-osmolar contrast media, iohexol and iopromide, on renal function and survival in patients who underwent coronary angiography. A total of 14,141 cardiology patients from 2006 to 2013 were recruited, of whom 1,793 patients (679 patients on iohexol and 1,114 on iopromide) were evaluated for long-term renal impairment and 5,410 patients (1,679 patients on iohexol and 3,731 on iopromide) were admitted for survival analyses spanning as long as 15 years. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to explore the risk factors for long-term renal impairment. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to investigate the risk factors affecting survival. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting were applied to balance the baseline clinical characteristics. Patients receiving iohexol demonstrated a greater occurrence of renal impairment compared with those who received iopromide. Such difference remained consistent both before and after propensity score matching or inverse probability of treatment weighting, with a statistical significance of p <0.05. Among clinical variables, receiving contrast-enhanced contrast tomography/magnetic resonance imaging during follow-up, antihypertensive medication usage, presence of proteinuria, and anemia were identified as risk factors for long-term renal impairment (p = 0.041, 0.049, 0.006, and 0.029, respectively). During survival analyses, the difference was insignificant after propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting. In conclusion, administration of iohexol was more likely to induce long-term renal impairment than iopromide, particularly among patients diagnosed with anemia and proteinuria and those taking antihypertensive medication and with additional contrast exposure. The all-cause mortality, however, showed no significant difference between iohexol and iopromide administration.

Ameliorative effects of Modified Huangqi Chifeng decoction on podocyte injury via autophagy mediated by PI3K/AKT/mTOR and AMPK/mTOR pathways.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Proteinuria is recognized as a risk factor for the exacerbation of chronic kidney disease. Modified Huangqi Chifeng decoction (MHCD) has distinct advantages in reducing proteinuria. Our previous experimental results have shown that MHCD can inhibit excessive autophagy. However, the specific mechanism by which MHCD regulates autophagy needs to be further explored. AIM OF THE STUDY: In this study, in vivo and in vitro experiments were conducted to further clarify the protective mechanism of MHCD on the kidney and podocytes by regulating autophagy based on phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/mTOR signaling pathways. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By a single injection via the tail vein, Sprague-Dawley rats received Adriamycin (5 mg/kg) to establish a model of proteinuria nephropathy. They were divided into control, model, MHCD, 3-methyladenine (3 MA), 3 MA + MHCD, and telmisartan groups and were administered continuously for 6 weeks. The MHCD-containing serum was prepared, and a model of podocyte injury induced by Adriamycin (0.2 µg/mL) was established. RESULTS: MHCD reduced the 24-h urine protein levels and relieved pathological kidney damage. During autophagy in the kidneys of rats with Adriamycin-induced nephropathy, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is inhibited, while the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway is activated. MHCD antagonized these effects, thereby inhibiting excessive autophagy. MHCD alleviated Adriamycin-induced podocyte autophagy, as demonstrated using Pik3r1 siRNA and an overexpression plasmid for Prkaa1/Prkaa2. Furthermore, MHCD could activate the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway while suppressing the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that MHCD can activate the interaction between the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathways to maintain autophagy balance, inhibit excessive autophagy, and play a role in protecting the kidneys and podocytes.

An open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of budesonide in patients with IgA nephropathy at high risk of progression.

We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of budesonide (Budenofalk) in the treatment of patients with IgA Nephropathy. We conducted a prospective, interventional, open-label, single-arm, non-randomized study that enrolled 32 patients with IgAN at high risk of progression (BUDIGAN study, ISRCTN47722295, date of registration 14/02/2020). Patients were treated with Budesonide at a dose of 9 mg/day for 12 months, subsequently tapered to 3 mg/day for another 12 months. The primary endpoints were change of eGFR and proteinuria at 12, 24 and 36 months. The study cohort had a mean eGFR and 24-h proteinuria of 59 ± 24 ml/min/1.73m2 and 1.89 ± 1.5 g/day, respectively. Treatment with budesonide determined a reduction in proteinuria at 12-, 24- and 36-months by -32.9% (95% CI - 53.6 to - 12.2), - 49.7% (95% CI - 70.1 to - 29.4) and - 68.1% (95% CI - 80.6 to - 55.7). Budesonide determined an eGFR preservation corresponding to a 12-, 24- and 36-months change of + 7.68% (95% CI - 4.7 to 20.1), + 7.42% (95% CI - 7.23 to 22.1) and + 4.74% (95%CI - 13.5 to 23), respectively. The overall eGFR change/year was + 0.83 ml/min/y (95% CI - 0.54 to 4.46). Budesonide was well-tolerated, and treatment emergent adverse events were mostly mild in severity and reversible. Budesonide was effective in the treatment of patients with IgAN at high-risk of progression in terms of reducing proteinuria and preserving renal function over 36 months of therapy.

Adverse Events of Everolimus in Patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Treated for Renal Angiomyolipoma/Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma.

Background: Although regarded as a potentially efficient approach to address tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-associated complications, the adverse event profile of everolimus has not yet been fully elucidated. The present study aimed to clarify the adverse event spectrum in patients with TSC who are using everolimus for common indications, in comparison to those who do not use everolimus. Materials and Methods: We recruited patients with TSC who were followed up annually at TSC integrated clinics or referred for medical assistance. Medical reviews and laboratory investigations were performed at baseline and annually by clinical physicians. The adverse events were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Results: Common adverse events in everolimus users included hypercholesterolemia (55%), gingivostomatitis (50%), proteinuria (50%), and hyperglycemia (40%). Compared with everolimus nonusers, the occurrence of gingivostomatitis and proteinuria was significantly higher in everolimus users (gingivostomatitis, p=0.02; proteinuria, p=0.02). Among the everolimus users, 12 patients had level I CTCAE, and five had level II CTCAE. None of the everolimus users presented with CTCAE level III or higher. Conclusion: Patients with TSC who are everolimus users had a higher tendency to develop gingivostomatitis and proteinuria compared to nonusers. However, no differences were observed in the occurrence of other adverse events between everolimus users and nonusers.

Therapeutic effectiveness of anlotinib combined with etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a single-arm, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Anlotinib plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) achieves good efficacy, but there is still room for improvement. This clinical study examined the effectiveness of anlotinib plus etoposide for maintenance therapy in ES-SCLC. METHODS: The current single-arm, prospective phase II study was performed at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (March 2019 to March 2022). After successful primary etoposide-based therapy, anlotinib was administered at 12 mg/day on days 1 to 14 of 21-day cycles until disease progression or consent withdrawal. All patients also received etoposide at 50 mg/day on days 1 to 14 of 21-day cycles for a maximum of six cycles. Progression-free survival (PFS) constituted the primary study endpoint. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. In addition, adverse events (AEs) were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were treated. Median PFS and OS were 8.02 (95%CI 5.36-10.67) and 11.04 (95%CI 10.37-11.68) months, respectively. Totally 9 and 18 participants showed a partial response and stable disease, respectively; ORR and DCR were 32.14% and 96.43%, respectively. The commonest all-grade AEs were fatigue (n = 11, 39.28%), hypertension (n = 11, 39.28%), loss of appetite (n = 9, 32.14%), oral mucositis (n = 7, 25.00%) and proteinuria (n = 6, 21.40%). Grade 3-4 AEs included fatigue (n = 4, 14.28%), hypertension (n = 2, 7.14%), hand and foot syndrome (n = 2, 7.14%), oral mucositis (n = 1, 3.57%), hemoptysis (n = 1, 3.57%), proteinuria (n = 1, 3.57%), gingival bleeding (n = 1, 3.57%), and serum creatinine elevation (n = 1, 3.57%). CONCLUSION: Maintenance anlotinib plus etoposide achieves promising PFS and OS in clinical ES-SCLC. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1800019421.

Risk of antiangiogenic adverse events in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving aflibercept in combination with chemotherapy: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Aflibercept has been approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer for more than a decade, but its antiangiogenesis adverse effect profile during treatment remains unclear. This study is conducted to systematically review the risk of antiangiogenic adverse events in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving aflibercept plus chemotherapy. METHODS: We searched databases, including PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library up to September 9, 2021. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and single-arm studies were included in the review. Statistical analyses were performed using R to calculate the summary incidence rate of antiangiogenic-related adverse events, odds ratios and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed by subgroup analysis. Publication bias analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to confirm the reliability of the results. RESULTS: A total of 2889 patients from 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the included studies was evaluated as qualified for further quantitative synthesis. In part of single-arm studies, the occurrence rates were 44.2% (95%CI, 39.7-48.7%) for hypertension, 31.3% (95% CI, 19.3-43.3%) for proteinuria, 27.3% (95%CI, 21.2-33.4%) for epistaxis, 22.5% (95%CI, 7.8-37.3%) for hemorrhage events, 8.0% (95%CI, 2.0-14 .0%) for venous thromboembolic event in all grades and 22.6% (95%CI, 19.1-26.2%) for grade III/IV hypertension, 7.4% (95%CI, 6.2-8.5%) for grade III/IV proteinuria. In part of RCT, compared to its counterpart, aflibercept containing arm was associated with the increased incidence rate in hypertension (OR:6.30, 95%CI: 3.49-11.36), proteinuria (OR:4.12, 95%CI: 1.25-13.61), epistaxis (OR:3.71, 95%CI: 2.84-4.85), III/IV hypertension (OR:7.20, 95%CI: 5.23-9.92), III/IV proteinuria (OR:5.13, 95%CI: 3.13-8.41). The funnel plot, Begg test and Egger test were carried out on the primary endpoints, III/IV hypertension rate and III/IV proteinuria rate, the result of which detected no obvious publication bias. No significant difference was observed in subgroup analysis in the primary endpoint between the subgroups stratified by treatment line (firstline or non-firstline), chemotherapy regime (FOLFIRI or others) and study design (RCTs or single-arm trials). CONCLUSION: The available evidence suggests that using aflibercept is associated with an increased risk of antiangiogenic adverse events compared with controls. Further studies are needed to investigate this association. In the appropriate clinical scenario, the use of aflibercept in its approved indications remains justified. However, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution, as some of the evidence comes from single-arm clinical trials.

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade after AKI with or without Recovery among US Veterans with Diabetic Kidney Disease.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Among patients with CKD, optimal use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers after AKI is uncertain. Despite these medications' ability to reduce risk of mortality and other adverse outcomes, there is concern that ACEi/ARB use may delay recovery of kidney function or precipitate recurrent AKI. Prior studies have provided conflicting data regarding the optimal timing of these medications after AKI and have not addressed the role of kidney recovery in determining appropriate timing. This study in US Veterans with diabetes mellitus and proteinuria demonstrated an association between ACEi/ARB use and lower mortality. This association was more pronounced with earlier post-AKI ACEi/ARB use and was not meaningfully affected by initiating ACEis/ARBs before versus after recovery from AKI. BACKGROUND: Optimal use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) after AKI is uncertain. METHODS: Using data derived from electronic medical records, we sought to estimate the association between ACEi/ARB use after AKI and mortality in US military Veterans with indications for such treatment (diabetes and proteinuria) while accounting for AKI recovery. We used ACEi/ARB treatment after hospitalization with AKI (defined as serum creatinine ≥50% above baseline concentration) as a time-varying exposure in Cox models. The outcome was all-cause mortality. Recovery was defined as return to ≤110% of baseline creatinine. A secondary analysis focused on ACEi/ARB use relative to AKI recovery (before versus after). RESULTS: Among 54,735 Veterans with AKI, 31,146 deaths occurred over a median follow-up period of 2.3 years. Approximately 57% received an ACEi/ARB <3 months after hospitalization. In multivariate analysis with time-varying recovery, post-AKI ACEi/ARB use was associated with lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.77). The association between ACEi/ARB use and mortality varied over time, with lower mortality risk associated with earlier initiation ( P for interaction with time <0.001). In secondary analysis, compared with those with neither recovery nor ACEi/ARB use, risk of mortality was lower in those with recovery without ACEi/ARB use (aHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.94), those without recovery with ACEi/ARB use (aHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.72), and those with ACEi/ARB use after recovery (aHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated lower mortality associated with ACEi/ARB use in Veterans with diabetes, proteinuria, and AKI, regardless of recovery. Results favored earlier ACEi/ARB initiation.

Bevacizumab-induced proteinuria and its association with antihypertensive drugs: A retrospective cohort study using a Japanese administrative database.

Proteinuria is a major side-effect of the anti-tumor drug bevacizumab, although its incidence and risk factors in the real world are still unclear. Although renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors are used clinically to prevent proteinuria, their efficacy remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to reveal the incidence and risk factors of bevacizumab-induced proteinuria and examine the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs in preventing proteinuria. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Hospital Organization Clinical Data Archives and Medical Information Analysis Databank. Hospitalized patients who received bevacizumab between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019, were included. The study outcome was proteinuria within 12 months of bevacizumab administration. Patient characteristics, laboratory tests, and medications were compared between patients with and without proteinuria using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Among the 2,458 patients, 27% developed proteinuria after bevacizumab administration. Nursing dependence (odds ratio [OR], 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.89-3.05; P<0.001) and systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.17-1.79; P<0.001) were identified as risk factors. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 60-89, 45-59, and <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 had 29.7%, 76.8%, and 66.0% higher odds of proteinuria, respectively, than those with an eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2. No significant relationship was observed between antihypertensive drugs and the occurrence of proteinuria. More patients may suffer from proteinuria after bevacizumab administration than previously reported. Nursing dependence and systolic blood pressure are predictive risk factors for bevacizumab-induced proteinuria. Patients at risk of proteinuria should be closely monitored.

Efficacy and safety of belimumab therapy for patients with lupus nephritis: A meta-analysis and a propensity score-matched case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we performed a meta-analysis and a propensity score-matched case-control study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: We analyzed the data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of belimumab treatment on renal improvement and adverse effects. Our study included a total of six LN patients who received belimumab treatment and an additional six LN patients who received standard therapy. All participants were followed up for a duration exceeding 96 weeks to evaluate the outcomes of the treatments. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis incorporated data from three articles involving a total of 666 patients. The results of the analysis revealed that a higher proportion of patients who received belimumab treatment experienced renal improvement compared to those in the control group. The patients in belimumab group had a higher renal complete response rate and proteinuria improvement rate compared to the control group. However, belimumab treatment did not increase the renal partial response rate compared to the control group. The belimumab group also exhibited a higher proportion of patients who achieved normalization of antidouble-stranded DNA, as well as normalization of low C3 and C4 levels. In our case-control study, significant improvement in proteinuria was demonstrated with belimumab at Week 48 (p = 0.037) and at all subsequent time points (all p < 0.05). Over the course of 96 weeks, belimumab treatment was associated with renal function stabilization and an increase in C3 and C4 levels. Moreover, the use of belimumab resulted in a reduction in glucocorticoid dosage at Week 24 (p = 0.02). Additionally, patients receiving belimumab treatment had a lower risk of severe treatment-emergent adverse events, and no other significant adverse effects were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LN, the utilization of belimumab therapy has demonstrated notable improvements in renal response rates. Additionally, it has shown a decreased likelihood of serious treatment-related adverse events and a diminished need for glucocorticoid dosage when compared to the active control group.

Effects of Induction Therapy on Graft Functions in Terms of Immunologic Risk.

BACKGROUND: Advances in immunosuppressive therapies and surgical techniques have led to a significant reduction in the incidence of rejection within 1 year after kidney transplantation. Immunologic risk is an important factor affecting graft functions and guiding the clinician in the selection of induction therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate graft functions based on serum creatinine levels, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD- EPI) and proteinuria levels, frequency of leukopenia, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK virus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity in patients with low and high immunologic risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 80 renal recipients. Recipients were divided into 2 groups: patients at low immunologic risk who received basiliximab only and those with high immunologic risk who received low-dose (1.5 mg/kg for 3 days) antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the 2 risk groups in terms of first, third, sixth, and 12th-month creatinine levels, CKD-EPI, proteinuria levels, leukopenia frequency, and CMV and BK virus PCR positivity. CONCLUSION: One-year graft survivals did not differ significantly between these 2 treatment modalities. The combined use of low-dose antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab in the induction treatment of patients with high immunologic risk seems promising in terms of graft survival, leukopenia frequency, and CMV and BK virus PCR positivity.

Comparison between hydroxychloroquine and systemic corticosteroids in IgA nephropathy: a two-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is recommended as a treatment for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) to control proteinuria. The long-term effects of HCQ compared to systemic corticosteroid therapy remain unclear. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case‒control study at Peking University First Hospital. Thirty-nine patients with IgAN who received HCQ for at least 24 months without corticosteroids (CSs) or other immunosuppressive agents were included. Thirty-nine matched patients who received systemic CS therapy were selected using propensity score matching. Clinical data over a 24-month period were compared. RESULTS: In the HCQ group, the level of proteinuria decreased from 1.72 [1.44, 2.35] to 0.97 [0.51, 1.37] g/d (-50.5 [-74.0, -3.4] %, P < 0.001) at 24 months. A significant decline in proteinuria was also found in the CS group, but no significant differences were found between the HCQ group and CS group in the levels of proteinuria (0.97 [0.51, 1.37] vs. 0.53 [0.25, 1.81] g/d, P = 0.707) and change rates (-50.5% [-74.0%, -3.4%] vs. -63.7% [-78.5%, -24.2%], P = 0.385) at 24 months. In addition, the decline rates of eGFR between the HCQ and CS groups were comparable (-7.9% [-16.1%, 5.8%] vs. -6.6% [-14.9%, 5.3%], P = 0.758). More adverse events were observed in the CS group. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term use of HCQ can maintain stable renal function with minimal side effects. In patients who cannot tolerate corticosteroids, HCQ might be an effective and safe supportive therapy for IgAN.