Assessment of platelet functional activity in healthy individuals and patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. Possible inconsistencies between aggregation and flow cytometry tests.

Platelet functional activity was assessed in healthy volunteers (HV, n=92), patients with stable angina pectoris (SA, n=42) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS, n=73), treated with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) + clopidogrel and ASA + ticagrelor, respectively. In all HV and patients we have compared parameters of platelet aggregation (maximum light transmission and velocity, Tmax and Vmax) and parameters, characterizing exposure of platelet activation markers, evaluated by flow cytometry. HV platelets were activated by 10 µM, 1 µM TRAP, and 20 µM, 5 µM, 2.5 µM ADP; patient platelets were activated by 10 µM TRAP and by 20 µM and 5 µM ADP. Strong and significant correlations between the aggregation and flow cytometry parameters (the r correlation coefficient from 0.4 up to >0.6) most frequently were registered in HV platelet during activation by 1 µM TRAP and in SA patients during platelet activation by 20 µM and 5 µM ADP. However, in many other cases these correlations were rather weak (r < 0.3) and sometimes statistically insignificant. In HV the differences in PAC-1 binding parameters between platelets activated by 10 µM TRAP (the strongest agonist) and all ADP concentrations were negligible (≤ 10%), while CD62P binding (at all ADP concentrations) and LTA parameters for (5 µM and 2.5 µM ADP) were significantly lower (by 40-60%). Antiplatelet therapy in patients decreased all parameters as compared to HV, but to varying extents. For 10 µM TRAP the MFI index for PAC-1 binding (40-50% decrease) and for both ADP concentrations the Tmax values (60-85% decrease) appeared to be the most sensitive in comparison with the other parameters that decreased to a lesser extent. The data obtained indicate a possibility of inconsistency between different LTA and flow cytometry parameters in assessing platelet activity and efficacy of antiplatelet drugs.

Platelet function testing: Update on determinant variables and permissive windows using a platelet-count-based device.

While there are various aspects of platelet biology that can be studied in the lab (i.e. adhesion, degranulation, integrin activation), the master test for platelet function is that which gives a measure of the platelet aggregation capacity upon stimulation with an agonist. Platelet function testing is necessary for the diagnosis of platelet disorders and the monitoring of patients receiving anti-platelet treatments. Furthermore, it becomes relevant in the quality control of platelet concentrates for transfusion purposes, especially considering the global concern about long term storage, other forms of storage (i.e. cryopreservation, lyophilization), and the impact of Pathogen Reduction Treatments (PRTs) on platelet performance upon transfusion. However, it has been acknowledged as technically difficult and demanding, since a fine platelet function test must be carried out under specific conditions. Still, there might be occasions that preclude the platelet function testing abiding to the gold standard requirements, thus, leaving us with the necessity to redefine which variables may condition or limit the analysis of platelet function testing. In the present manuscript, we test different variables (such as the anticoagulant used or the time elapsed since extraction) and the possibility to reconstitute blood prior to platelet function analysis. This study aims to provide windows of action at the diagnostics lab, especially when not all of the recommended procedures and conditions can be followed: for example, when a sample is sent from a long distance, when there is a limitation on blood extraction volume or when certain parameters (platelet count) preclude reliable test results.

The study of platelet aggregation using a microtiter plate reader ‒ methodological considerations.

Optical aggregometry by 96-well plate assay, the microplate method, is a fast, efficient, and readily available method for measuring the pharmacological effects of antiplatelet drugs. Even though recent years have witnessed growing interest in adopting the microplate method for widespread use, it remains in the shadow of the standard light transmission aggregometry (LTA). Regardless of the method used, the results of platelet aggregation depend on a variety of factors and often vary among laboratories worldwide. While several methodological papers have examined the microplate method, no standards have been established, most likely because the approach is not used as a diagnostic tool. Currently, the microplate method is recommended by researchers to be used in conjunction with LTA or as an adjunct to LTA. This raises the question of whether an optimal protocol exists for microplate aggregometry, and what are the key considerations in a good experimental protocol for obtaining reliable results? This article attempts to address these questions by summarizing the knowledge accumulated in this field over the last three decades.

Comprehensive investigation of platelet function in patients with cirrhosis.

Cirrhosis presents with thrombocytopenia and possibly thrombocytopathy. Previous studies exploring platelet function gave conflicting results and most controversies are explained by the variety of methods employed for investigation. We sought to assess in-vitro the overall platelet function in cirrhosis. We investigated 34 patients by using the following tests. (i)Aggregometry. (ii)Measurement of the content of platelet granules. (iii)Cytometric platelet activation. (iv)Plasmatic markers of in-vivo platelet activation. (v)Platelet procoagulant activity by thrombin generation (TG) in platelet-rich plasma (PRP). TG measured in PRP for patients and controls was similar. Platelets from patients with cirrhosis showed reduction of aggregation and secretion of ATP. Similar results were observed for platelet activation parameters such as P-selectin expression and PAC-1 platelet binding. Plasma levels of ßeta-thromboglobulin and soluble P-selectin, were increased in patients-vs-controls. In contrast, there were no patients-vs-controls differences for plasmatic platelet-factor-4. Results are consistent with a state of in-vivo platelet activation and decreased in-vitro aggregation. Since bleeding events following invasive procedures are uncommon in cirrhosis, we speculate that in-vitro aggregometry testing does not reflect the situation occurring in-vivo. Results of the study and pathophysiological considerations support the conclusion that platelet function in cirrhosis as determined by aggregometry, although somewhat impaired, may support the overall hemostatic potential, which is needed for most invasive interventions. These conclusions are in line with the recommendations of international guidelines, warning against indiscriminate use of prophylactic preprocedural administration of platelets before invasive procedures. Decision on platelet support should not be made based on in-vitro laboratory testing for platelet function.

Flow-chamber device (T-TAS) to diagnose patients suspected of platelet function defects.

BACKGROUND: Patients suspected of platelet function defects represent a diagnostic challenge for the clinical laboratory, mainly due to the complexity and poor standardization of screening methods. We compared a new flow-based chip-equipped point-of-care (T-TAS) device with lumi-aggregometry and other specific tests. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 96 patients suspected of platelet function defects and 26 patients referred to hospital for an evaluation of residual platelet function while on antiplatelet therapy. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 96 patients displayed abnormal platelet function by lumi-aggregometry, and 10 of them had defective granule content and were classified as δ-storage pool disease (δ-SPD). T-TAS compared favorably with lumi-aggregometry in detecting the most severe forms of platelet function defects (i.e., δ-SPD) [test agreement (lumi-light transmission aggregometry [lumi-LTA] vs T-TAS) for the δ-SPD subgroup was 80% and K CHOEN 0.695. T-TAS was less sensitive to milder platelet function defects (i.e., primary secretion defects [PSD]). Concerning patients on antiplatelets, test agreement (lumi-LTA vs T-TAS) in detecting patients who were responders to this therapy was 54%; K CHOEN 0.150. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that T-TAS can detect the more severe forms of platelet function defects such as δ-SPD. There is limited agreement of T-TAS with lumi-aggregometry in identifying responders to antiplatelets. However, this poor agreement is commonly shared by lumi-aggregometry and other devices owing to the lack of test specificity and of prospective data from clinical trials linking platelet function with therapeutic efficacy.

Description of an In Vitro Platelet Function Analyzer-PFA-100™.

This manuscript represents a republication of a manuscript originally published in STH in 1995. This republication is to help celebrate 50 years of publishing for STH. The original abstract follows.A new in vitro system for the detection of platelet dysfunction, PFA-100®, has been developed. It provides a quantitative measure of platelet function in anticoagulated whole blood. The system comprises a microprocessor-controlled instrument and a disposable test cartridge containing a biologically active membrane. The instrument aspirates a blood sample under constant vacuum from the sample reservoir through a capillary and a microscopic aperture cut into the membrane. The membrane is coated with collagen and epinephrine or adenosine 5'-diphosphate. The presence of these biochemical stimuli, and the high shear rates generated under the standardized flow conditions, result in platelet attachment, activation, and aggregation, slowly building a stable platelet plug at the aperture. The time required to obtain full occlusion of the aperture is reported as the "closure time." We have found that impairment of von Willebrand factor, or inhibition of platelet receptors glycoprotein Ib or IIb/IIIa with monoclonal antibodies or peptides, resulted in abnormal closure times. An antifibrinogen antibody, in contrast, failed to show any effect. The test appears to be sensitive to platelet adherence and aggregation abnormalities. The PFA-100® system has potential applications in routine evaluation of platelet function in the clinical setting because of its accuracy, case of operation, and rapid turnaround of results.

Novel Platelet Function Analyzer 200 Predicts Blood Transfusion After Elective Cardiac Surgery in Patients Suspended on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

The value of platelet function test in timing of cardiac surgery remains uncertain. Researches on correlation between Platelet Function Analyzer 200 (PFA-200) and bleeding after elective cardiac surgery are still inadequate. The objective of this study was to investigate the predictive value of PFA-200 in blood transfusion after cardiac surgery. A total of 71 patients on aspirin and P2Y12 receptor inhibitors undergoing cardiac surgery in Fuwai Hospital were enrolled. Platelet function after discontinuing of antiplatelet drugs was assessed by PFA-200 using closure time (CT). PFA-200 results before surgery were included in the statistics. The primary endpoint was postoperative blood transfusion. Seventeen patients (21.9%) received blood transfusion after cardiac surgery. The preoperative PFA-200 CT value in the transfused group was significantly higher than that in the non-transfused group (147.24 ± 85.54 s vs 98.06 ± 61.59 s, P = .011). Using 106 seconds as the dividing point, the incidence of blood transfusion in the elevated PFA-200 (CT > 106 s) group was significantly higher than those in normal PFA-200 (CT ≤ 106 s) group (10/24 patients, 41.9% vs 7/47 patients, 14.7%, P = .012). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PFA-200 CT value > 106 s was an independent predictor of postoperative blood transfusion (OR: 4.05, 95%CI: 1.19-13.86, P = .026). The platelet function test PFA-200 had a predictive value for postoperative blood transfusion in elective cardiac surgery and had a promising prospect in the timing of cardiac surgery.

Cell Surface Platelet Tissue Factor Expression: Regulation by P2Y12 and Link to Residual Platelet Reactivity.

BACKGROUND: ADP-induced platelet activation leads to cell surface expression of several proteins, including TF (tissue factor). The role of ADP receptors in platelet TF modulation is still unknown. We aimed to assess the (1) involvement of P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors in ADP-induced TF exposure; (2) modulation of TFpos-platelets in anti-P2Y12-treated patients with coronary artery disease. Based on the obtained results, we revisited the intracellular localization of TF in platelets. METHODS: The effects of P2Y1 or P2Y12 antagonists on ADP-induced TF expression and activity were analyzed in vitro by flow cytometry and thrombin generation assay in blood from healthy subjects, P2Y12-/-, and patients with gray platelet syndrome. Ex vivo, P2Y12 inhibition of TF expression by clopidogrel/prasugrel/ticagrelor, assessed by VASP (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein) platelet reactivity index, was investigated in coronary artery disease (n=238). Inhibition of open canalicular system externalization and electron microscopy (TEM) were used for TF localization. RESULTS: In blood from healthy subjects, stimulated in vitro by ADP, the percentage of TFpos-platelets (17.3±5.5%) was significantly reduced in a concentration-dependent manner by P2Y12 inhibition only (-81.7±9.5% with 100 nM AR-C69931MX). In coronary artery disease, inhibition of P2Y12 is paralleled by reduction of ADP-induced platelet TF expression (VASP platelet reactivity index: 17.9±11%, 20.9±11.3%, 40.3±13%; TFpos-platelets: 10.5±4.8%, 9.8±5.9%, 13.6±6.3%, in prasugrel/ticagrelor/clopidogrel-treated patients, respectively). Despite this, 15% of clopidogrel good responders had a level of TFpos-platelets similar to the poor-responder group. Indeed, a stronger P2Y12 inhibition (130-fold) is required to inhibit TF than VASP. Thus, a VASP platelet reactivity index <20% (as in prasugrel/ticagrelor-treated patients) identifies patients with TFpos-platelets <20% (92% sensitivity). Finally, colchicine impaired in vitro ADP-induced TF expression but not α-granule release, suggesting that TF is open canalicular system stored as confirmed by TEM and platelet analysis of patients with gray platelet syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Data show that TF expression is regulated by P2Y12 and not P2Y1; P2Y12 antagonists downregulate the percentage of TFpos-platelets. In clopidogrel good-responder patients, assessment of TFpos-platelets highlights those with residual platelet reactivity. TF is stored in open canalicular system, and its membrane exposure upon activation is prevented by colchicine.

Multicenter evaluation of light transmission platelet aggregation reagents: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Platelet Physiology.

BACKGROUND: Light transmission aggregation (LTA) is used widely by the clinical and research communities. Although it is a gold standard, there is a lack of interlaboratory harmonization. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess whether sources of activators (mainly adenosine diphosphate [ADP], collagen, arachidonic acid, epinephrine, and thrombin receptor activating peptide6) and ristocetin contribute to poor LTA reproducibility. The secondary objective was to evaluate interindividual variability of results to appreciate the distribution of normal values and consequently better interpret pathologic results. METHODS: An international multicenter study involving 28 laboratories in which we compared LTA results obtained with center-specific activators and a comparator that we supplied. RESULTS: We report variability in the potency (P) of activators in comparison with the comparator. Thrombin receptor activating peptide 6 (P, 1.32-2.68), arachidonic acid (P, 0.87-1.43), and epinephrine (P, 0.97-1.34) showed the greatest variability. ADP (P, 1.04-1.20) and ristocetin (P, 0.98-1.07) were the most consistent. The data highlighted clear interindividual variability, notably for ADP and epinephrine. Four profiles of responses were observed with ADP from high-responders, intermediate-responders, and low-responders. A fifth profile corresponding to nonresponders (5% of the individuals) was observed with epinephrine. CONCLUSION: Based on these data, the establishment and adoption of simple standardization principles should mitigate variability due to activator sources. The observation of huge interindividual variability for certain concentrations of activators should lead to a cautious interpretation before reporting a result as abnormal. Confidence can be taken from the fact that difference between sources is not exacerbated in patients treated with antiplatelet agents.

Functional Testing for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Using Whole Blood Multiplate Impedance Aggregometry.

Immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs when heparin-dependent IgG antibodies bind to heparin/platelet factor 4 (H/PF4) complexes and activate platelets. There is a vast panoply of assays to investigate HIT which can be divided into two groups, antigen-based immunoassays that detect all antibodies against H/PF4 and are used as a first diagnostic step and functional assays that will identify only the antibodies capable of activating platelets and are mandatory to confirm a diagnosis of pathological HIT. The serotonin-release assay, known as SRA, has been the gold standard for decades, but in the last 10 years, other easier alternatives have been described. The current chapter will focus on whole blood multiple electrode aggregometry, a validated method for the functional diagnosis of HIT.

Monitoring of Antiplatelet Therapy.

In the late 1990s, the antithrombotic antiplatelet agent, clopidogrel, a P2Y12 inhibitor, was introduced. Around the same time, there was an increase in a number of new methods to measure platelet function (e.g., PFA-100 in 1995), and this has continued. It became evident that not all patients responded to clopidogrel in the same way and that some patients had a relative "resistance" to therapy, termed "high on-treatment platelet reactivity." This then led to some publications to advocate platelet function testing being used for patients on antiplatelet therapy. Platelet function testing was also suggested for use in patients awaiting cardiac surgery after stopping their antiplatelet therapy as a way of balancing thrombotic risk pre-surgery and bleeding risk perioperatively. This chapter will discuss some of the commonly used platelet function tests used in these settings, particularly those that are sometimes referred to as point-of-care tests or that require minimal laboratory sample manipulation. The latest guidance and recommendations for platelet function testing will be discussed following several clinical trials looking at the usefulness of platelet function testing in these clinical settings.

Assessment of Platelet Function by Automated Light Transmission Aggregometry.

Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) has long been the historical "gold standard" of platelet function testing and is typically performed in specialized hemostasis laboratories due to its manual and labor intensive process. However, newer automated testing provides a means of standardization and ability to perform the testing in routine laboratories. Here we describe the measurement of platelet aggregation in the CS-Series™ (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) and CN-Series™ (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) routine blood coagulation analyzers. Differences in the methods for both analyzers are further described. For the CS-5100™ analyzer, the final diluted concentrations of the agonists are prepared by manual pipetting from reconstituted agonist solutions. These prepared dilutions are eight times concentrated with respect to the final working concentration of the agonists and appropriately diluted within the analyzer to achieve the desired concentration of agonists prior to testing. For the CN-6000™ analyzer, the dilutions of agonists and the final working concentrations are automatically prepared by the auto-dilution feature in the analyzer.

Assessment of Platelet Function by High-Throughput Screening Light Transmission Aggregometry: Optimul Assay.

Platelet function testing is critical in the diagnosis of bleeding disorders and allows monitoring of antiplatelet therapy. The gold standard assay, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), was developed 60 years ago and remains widely used worldwide. It requires, however, access to expensive equipment and is time-consuming, and the interpretation of results requires evaluation by an experienced investigator. It also suffers from a lack of standardization, resulting in widely variable results between laboratories. 96-well plate-based Optimul aggregometry utilizes the same principles of LTA and aims to standardize agonist concentrations with the development of 96-well plates which are precoated with 7 concentrations of each lyophilized agonist (arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, collagen, epinephrine, TRAP-6 amide, and U46619) and stored at ambient room temperature (20-25 °C) for up to 12 weeks. For platelet function testing, 40 µL of platelet-rich plasma is added to each well, and the plate is placed onto a plate shaker, after which platelet aggregation is determined by changes in light absorbance. This method reduces the blood volume required and allows for in-depth platelet function analysis without specialist training, or the need to purchase expensive, dedicated equipment.

Validation of Plateletworks ADP for the ProCyte Dx analyzer.

BACKGROUND: Platelet function testing in cats allows determination of clopidogrel effect. Plateletworks assesses aggregation based on decreasing platelet counts on hematology analyzers in response to agonists. It has not been validated for the IDEXX ProCyte Dx analyzer. Ideal time to perform analysis and the utility of other platelet parameters have not been fully assessed. OBJECTIVES: To validate Plateletworks ADP on the ProCyte Dx, to investigate the utility of various platelet parameters using Plateletworks ADP, and determine the ideal time to perform analysis. ANIMALS: Twenty healthy cats recruited from the general population used for transference of reference intervals to a new analyzer, and 10 cats receiving clopidogrel to determine clopidogrel effect. METHODS: Plateletworks ADP using the ProCyte Dx and ADVIA 2120i analyzer was run simultaneously in both healthy cats and cats receiving clopidogrel, and CBC results at different timepoints were compared between analyzers. RESULTS: Aggregation was significantly different (P < .001) between analyzers. Cohen's kappa showed almost perfect agreement for determination of clopidogrel effect, and the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic was 1.0. Lower limits of the aggregation reference interval in healthy cats were 28.8% on the ProCyte Dx and 12.5% on the ADVIA 2120i. Coefficients of variation for platelet parameters were not different between analyzers. No significant changes in mean platelet volume, plateletcrit, large platelets, and mean platelet component were identified. No significant change in aggregation was observed within the first hour after phlebotomy. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Our study validated the Plateletworks ADP system on the ProCyte Dx analyzer. Samples may be analyzed up to 1 h after collection.

Platelet function in neonates and children.

Platelets are major regulators of haemostasis and coagulation. The primary role of platelets in coagulation is to form a stable clot and stop bleeding. Studies of platelet phenotype and function in neonates and children have been restricted by the large volumes required for many common platelet function tests such as platelet aggregometry. Developmental changes in platelets have not been as well described as developmental changes in plasma coagulation proteins, and overall, platelet phenotype and function in neonates and children has been understudied when compared to adults. Recent developments in more sensitive platelet function testing methods requiring smaller blood volumes such as flow cytometry has enabled recent studies to further investigate platelet phenotype and function in neonates and children. In this review we will provide an overview of recent advances from the past five years in platelets in the context of developmental haemostasis, as well as the role of platelets in neonatal paediatric disease.

Platelet Aggregation in Apparently Healthy Elderly Populations: Reference Ranges and Influence of Hematology Parameters.

BACKGROUND: Reference intervals based on younger populations may not apply to elderly populations. The aim of the current study was to calculate reference ranges for platelet aggregation in apparently healthy Chinese elderly populations and analyze the impact of gender, age, and hematological parameters on platelet aggregation in vitro. METHODS: A total of 138 males and 161 females were enrolled based on stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. Platelet aggregation was measured with sodium citrate anticoagulation whole blood samples using a PL12 analyzer, triggered by adenosine-5'-diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA) agonists. Hematological parameters were measured using a Sysmex XE2100 instrument. RESULTS: In the total sample tested in this study, the platelet aggregation induced by AA and ADP was not dependent on age (p > 0.05) but gender. Platelet aggregation triggered by ADP and AA was more enhanced in females than males (p = 0.024 for AA, p = 0.036 for ADP). The recommended reference values of AA-induced platelet aggregation were 48.42% - 85.93% for males and 43.62% - 87.80% for females. The recommended reference values of ADP-induced platelet aggregation were 38.12% - 80.21% for males and 40.12% - 83.05% for females. Furthermore, for all agonists, a positive correlation was found between platelet aggregation and platelet count. The ADP-triggered aggregation showed a significant positive correlation with white blood cell (WBC) count and a negative correlation with red blood cell (RBC) count. Moreover, platelet aggregation showed no significant correlation with mean platelet volume or hemoglobin concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Combined and gender-specific reference ranges for platelet aggregation in healthy elderly populations were established in whole blood measured by a sequential platelet counting method.

Platelet Functional Testing Via High-Throughput Microtiter Plate-Based Assays.

Platelets play a critical role in hemostasis and thrombosis; therefore, in vitro assays that measure platelet reactivity are fundamental tools to gain insight into these physiologic processes, to diagnose platelet disorders, and to develop antithrombotic therapies. However, conventional platelet assays such as aggregometry, the clinical gold standard for assessing platelet function, are low throughput and require specialized equipment. Since platelets have a finite life span ex vivo, processes to miniaturize and multiplex assays allow a much broader overview of platelet function in significantly less time than conventional assays. Several groups have developed simplified, high-throughput approaches to quantify platelet activation with standard laboratory equipment to lower the barrier of entry to study platelet biology. This article describes a panel of optimized and validated high-throughput microplate assays to comprehensively assess platelet functionality, independently or in combination, to increase throughput and reduce costs. Specifically, following stimulation of platelets, a plate reader can be used to measure light transmission aggregation via absorbance; dense-granule secretion based on ATP-dependent luminescence generation; and cytosolic calcium levels with a cell-permeant, fluorescent Ca2+ -sensitive dye. Additionally, platelets are an easily accessible component of the blood that share signaling pathways with other cells, making them ideal for high-throughput drug screens. The highly adaptable and complementary assays presented in this article can be used to decipher the molecular mechanism underlying platelet activation or to identify novel inhibitors. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Microtiter plate-based light transmission aggregometry Basic Protocol 2: Measuring dense-granule secretion in high-throughput microplate assays Basic Protocol 3: Microtiter plate-based calcium mobilization Support Protocol: Platelet isolation and enumeration.

High-on-treatment platelet reactivity predicts adverse outcome after carotid artery stenting: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) has been established as a predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), but no data are available on its predictive value in patients on DAPT after carotid artery stenting (CAS). We aimed to evaluate the possible association between HTPR in patients on aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy after CAS and subsequent MACE. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with CAS in a single institution were enrolled in a prospective clinical study. HTPR was evaluated with 5 different laboratory assays carried out just before CAS. MACE incidence (cerebral ischemia, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, acute limb ischemia and vascular death) was evaluated at 30 days and thereafter at yearly visits. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were enrolled in the study, and eight were then excluded because blood samples resulted unsuitable for the laboratory testing or CAS aborted for technical problems. Median follow-up was 5.8 years and during this period 47 MACE occurred. HTPR detected by multiplate electronic aggregometry (MEA) and the VASP phosphorylation assay (VASP) were associated with a significantly enhanced risk of MACE (p = 0.048 and p = 0.038, respectively). However, HTPR to three tests (HTPR3) was more strongly predictive of increased risk of a vascular event at follow up (p = 0.005) at bivariate analysis and also at Cox regression multivariate analysis (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: HTPR to three different assays (mainly to VASP + PFA P2Y+ VerifyNow) in patients on DAPT after CAS has predictive value for subsequent MACE. Prospective studies to assess whether platelet function testing-guided antiplatelet therapy is superior to standard DAPT in patient undergoing CAS should be considered.

Time from blood draw to multiple electrode aggregometry and association with platelet reactivity.

Results from multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) may vary according to pre-analytic factors. This study aimed to analyze the association of time from blood draw to MEA in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this observational single-center cohort study, platelet aggregation (aggregation units, U) was quantified by MEA (Multiplate Analyzer) after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP; final concentration [Fc] 6.4 µM), thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP; Fc 32 µM), or arachidonic acid (AA; Fc 0.5 mM) in patients treated with ASA and clopidogrel following PCI. High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as ADP-induced platelet aggregation ≥ 46 U. The manufacturer recommends performing the analysis within 30-180 min after blood draw. Patients were grouped according to the time from blood draw to MEA: 30-180 min, < 30 min, or > 180 min. Platelet function of 273 patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI with dual antiplatelet therapy was analyzed. The median age was 72 years (interquartile range, IQR 62-79) and 179 (66%) were male. Median ADP-, TRAP-, and AA-induced aggregation was 25 (IQR 18-36) U, 79 (IQR 63-96) U, and 12 (IQR 7-18) U, respectively. For those analyzed within 30-180 min from blood draw, no significant correlation of time from blood draw to MEA was observed 1) ADP (r = - 0.04, p = 0.51); 2) TRAP (r = - 0.06, p = 0.32); 3) AA (r = - 0.03, p = 0.67). In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, the time from blood draw to multiple electrode aggregometry does not correlate with ADP- induced aggregation when the measurement occurred within the recommended time interval of 30-180 min after blood draw.