A four-year assessment of the characteristics of Rwandan FDA drug recalls.

BACKGROUND: A drug recall is an act of removing products from the market and/or returning them to the manufacturer for disposal or correction when they violate safety laws. Action can be initiated by the manufacturing company or by the order of a regulatory body. This study aimed to assess the characteristics of Rwanda FDA drug recall and determine the association between classes of recall and recall characteristics. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study. Data about recalled drugs were collected from the official website of the Rwanda FDA in the section assigned to "Safety alerts". The search included data reported between February 2019 and February 2023 covering four years. Data cleaning was conducted in Microsoft Excel to address missing data and inconsistencies, followed by importation into STATA/SE software version 17.0 for further cleaning and subsequent analysis. Descriptive statistics were computed for independent variables. Categorical variables were described in terms of counts and relative frequencies. Bivariate analyses used Pearson's chi-square test to illustrate the associations between categorical independent variables and recall classes. RESULTS: The study revealed that a large proportion (33.0%) of the recalled products belonged to Class I. Antibiotics constituted 35.8% of the recalled products, with contamination emerging as a leading cause and responsible for 26.4% of the recalls. India was the leading manufacturing country for the recalled products (29.2%), followed by France (17.9%), China (17.0%), Kenya (13.2%), and Russia (6.6%). An association was found between the class of recall and several recall characteristics, including the year of recall, drug category, safety issues, reporter, and manufacturing country. CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the characteristics of drug recalls in Rwanda. The insights gained contribute to a nuanced understanding of recall dynamics and provide evidence-based strategies to enhance drug quality, safety, efficacy, regulatory compliance, and patient welfare.

A retrospective regulatory analysis of FDA recalls carried out by pharmaceutical companies from 2012 to 2023.

To introduce products in the US market, pharmaceutical companies must first obtain FDA clearance. Manufacturers might recall a product if it poses a risk of damage or violates FDA regulations. This study investigates the types, causes and consequences of recalls, as well as FDA participation and suitable recall strategies. We relied on the FDA website to gather recall data sets from 2012 to 2023, collecting information on the date of issuance, company and type of violation. The most frequent causes for recalls were sterility issues and inadequate compliance with current good manufacturing practices (cGMP). An examination of sterility recalls revealed two primary causes: a lack of assurance in sterility (accounting for 48% of recalls) and instances of non-sterility (making up 45% of recalls). A thorough examination of cGMP recalls revealed five primary types of violations: process control issues, inadequate storage practices, manufacturing problems, the presence of nitroso-amine impurities and concerns regarding stability. The findings demonstrate that sterility and cGMP compliance are FDA priorities. Pharmaceutical companies must, therefore, enhance quality compliance and create effective quality management systems that oversee the manufacturing process, quality control, personnel training and documentation to avoid these recalls. Companies should establish an internal compliance checklist and be prepared for the rectification process.

Human Medicines Recall Announcements in Saudi Arabia Between 2017 and 2022: An Analysis of Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) Reports.

PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the characteristics of drug recall announcements issued over six years by the SFDA in Saudi Arabia. Additionally, to examine the patterns of voluntary drug recall requests by pharmaceutical companies (both innovator and generic) in response to product defects. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was conducted on drug recall announcements issued by the SFDA between 2017 and December 2022. The study included recalls of registered and unregistered drugs posted on the SFDA Drugs Circulars and Withdrawal webpage. Descriptive analysis was performed on relevant variables: recall year, therapeutic class, recall type, pharmaceutical company type, recall reasons and voluntary or involuntary product defect reports. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 371 products were recalled, with the majority being involuntary recalls (82.4%). About two-thirds of the recalls (66.0%) were related to registered products. The most common reasons for recalls were non-compliance with the manufacturer's specifications (33.2%), contamination (23.7%), and violations (20.5%). A total of 109 pharmaceutical companies were associated with the recalled products, with (85.3%) being generic pharmaceutical companies. The majority of innovator pharmaceutical companies (68.8%) requested voluntary drug recalls of defective products. Innovator pharmaceutical companies requested voluntary recalls more often than generic pharmaceutical companies. CONCLUSION: The study findings highlight the most frequent causes of drug recalls and the patterns of voluntary recall requests by pharmaceutical companies. Non-compliance with manufacturer's specifications was the most common reason for recalls. Significantly, more innovative pharmaceutical companies request voluntary recalls for product defects compared to generic pharmaceutical companies.

Impact of Drug Recalls on Patients in The Netherlands: A 5-Year Retrospective Data Analysis.

Drug recalls occur frequently and have the potential to impact considerable numbers of patients and healthcare providers. However, in the absence of a comprehensive overview the extent of conducted recalls and their impact on patients remains unknown. To address this, we developed a comprehensive overview of drug recalls affecting patients. We compiled this overview based on the drug recall registrations from the Jeroen Bosch Hospital (JBZ), the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), and the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP). A retrospective data analysis was conducted to identify drug recalls that affected patients. Specifically, we defined these as drug recalls that required patients to actively switch their drug to a different batch or brand of the same drug or to switch to a drug within the same or a different class of drugs. To quantify the impact, we used real-world drug dispensing data. Between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021, we identified 48 drug recalls that necessitated patients to make active changes to their medications an estimated 855,000 times. Most of the affected patients (292,000) were required to switch to a different brand of the same drug, whereas in 95,000 cases patients had to switch to a drug from another drug class. Our study suggests that a significant number of patients are affected by drug recalls. Future efforts are needed to elucidate patients' experiences and preferences regarding drug recalls, which could provide valuable insights to aid decision-making by relevant (national) authorities concerning drug recalls.

Preapproval Promises to Voluntarily Withdraw FDA-Approved Drugs.

This Viewpoint provides recommendations for improvements to strengthen legal obligations and decrease ambiguity for the US Food and Drug Administration regarding their reliance on voluntary preapproval withdrawal pledges.

The FDA Struggle to Withdraw Makena: Problems With the Accelerated Approval Process.

This Viewpoint discusses the controversy surrounding the FDA's efforts to withdraw Makena from the market and the broader implications for the accelerated approval pathway.

Review of drug recalls and quality of pharmaceutical products in Nepal.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pattern of substandard and falsified pharmaceutical products recall in Nepal. SETTING: We analysed drug recall notices issued by the Department of Drug Administration (DDA), Nepal, and systematically reviewed peer-reviewed research articles during January 2010 to December 2020. PARTICIPANTS: This study did not include human participants. However, data were collected from 72 drug recall notices issued by DDA and four research papers. RESULTS: A total of 346 pharmaceutical products were recalled during the reported period. The number of recalled pharmaceutical products has increased significantly over the past decade in Nepal. The most frequently recalled drugs were antimicrobials followed by gastrointestinal medicines, vitamins and supplements and pain and palliative medicines among others. Number of imported recalled drugs were slightly higher (42.2%) than domestic recalled drugs (40.7%). Sixty-two percentage of recalled drugs were substandard, 11% were falsified and remaining 27% were not registered at the DDA. Similarly, higher number of modern drugs (62%) were recalled than traditional ones (35%). Hand sanitisers used to minimise COVID-19 transmission contributed significantly to the list of recalled pharmaceutical products in 2020. Most of these sanitisers contained significant amounts of methanol (as high as 75% v/v) instead of appropriate amount of ethyl or isopropyl alcohol. The peer-reviewed research papers reported issues with labelling, unregistered drugs and drugs failed in several laboratory testing. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that number of recalls of substandard and falsified drugs are increasing in Nepal. Since the recall data in this paper did not include number of samples tested and location of samples collected, more studies to understand the prevalence of substandard and falsified drugs in Nepal is recommended.

Categorization and comparisons of drug recalls for manufacturers and compounders.

BACKGROUND: Ensuring the quality and safety of the pharmaceutical supply chain is a key policy focus vital to protecting the public from harmful or potentially harmful medications. Although the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports the number of recalled products per fiscal year and categorizes recalls based on product type and recall classification, these reports do not distinguish between manufactured and compounded products. OBJECTIVES: This research aims to categorize drug recalls based on the reason for recall and then to compare this reason between manufacturers and compounders. METHODS: All publicly available drug recall data were downloaded from the FDA Data Dashboard website on January 24, 2021. Two reviewers independently categorized the recalling firm, distribution pattern, and reason for recall, and a third reviewer resolved all conflicts. Descriptive statistics were reported for recall event classification, distribution, and recall reason for the full sample. Chi-square test of independence was used to assess categorical variables by facility type (manufacturer or compounder) as well as by event classification (class I, II, or III). A subgroup analysis was performed focusing on class I level recalls only, representing the most serious recall, and similar statistical procedures were performed. RESULTS: From June 8, 2012, to January 24, 2021, there were 12,343 drug products recalled; 6771 were from a manufacturer, and 5572 were from a compounder. Most recalls from both compounders and manufacturers were class II recalls with products being distributed to multiple states. Sterility assurance was the predominant reason for recall among compounders, whereas product quality was the most frequent recall reason for manufacturers. There were statistically significant differences in class I recalls between compounders and manufacturers and recall reason compared across recall classification. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in the reason for a drug to be recalled, the distribution level, and the product class for manufactured and compounded products.

The plague of unexpected drug recalls and the pandemic of falsified medications in cardiovascular medicine as a threat to patient safety and global public health: A brief review.

Valsartan, losartan, and irbesartan, are widely used in the treatment strategies of cardiovascular medicine diseases, including hypertension and heart failure. Recently, many formulations for the aforementioned diseases contained active pharmaceutical ingredients and had been abruptly recalled from the market due to safety concerns mainly associated with unwanted impurities - nitrosamines, which are highly carcinogenic substances accidentally produced during manufacturing. Along with cardiovascular medications, formulations containing ranitidine were also recalled from the market. This poses a particular threat to public health due to the non-prescription status of these drugs. Regulatory authorities, including the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency among others, have taken action to minimize patient risk and improve the manufacturing quality as well as re-checking current guidelines and recommendations. While these steps are necessary to avoid further recalls, authorities should remember the growing concerns of patients regarding the safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy. Apart from the genuine manufacturing mistakes mentioned above, falsified and counterfeit medications should be at the heart of global attention. The lack of a well-accepted definition of falsified/counterfeit medications has impeded political and scientific efforts to mitigate risk of this phenomenon. Falsified Medicines Directive should be considered the most pivotal legislation recently enacted to harmonize international cooperation. In summary, one should remember that only international and direct collaboration between patients, stakeholders, and authorities be considered a remedy for a pandemic of falsified medicines and plague of unexpected recalls due to safety concerns.

The Identification of Quality Risk Factors for Non-biological Complex Drugs and Epilepsy Drugs Using Statistical Analysis of Formulation-Based Recalls in the USA.

Pharmaceutical companies use the quality by design (QbD) approach to build high-quality drug products. A thorough understanding of risk factors is required to successfully employ QbD. In order to better understand risk factors that potentially impact drug product quality and inform future QbD approaches, we hypothesized root causes of drug product recalls based on publicly available data and a retroactive analysis of drug products recalled by the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) from 2012 to 2018. We focused on two categories of drug products that pose unique regulatory challenges and an increased risk of shortage that could hinder the adequate supply of quality medicine to the patient. Knowing the significant risk factors from previous drug product recalls can help inform QbD and avoid future recalls. Quality recall reasons were studied individually to find risk factors associated with each recall category. Logistical regression statistical tests were done in R using a significance level of 0.05 to find correlations between a recalled product and its manufacturing information such as excipients and manufacturing steps. The results showed significant positive and negative correlations, such as products containing magnesium stearate are more likely to be recalled for impurities and degradation. This information could be used in the future to inform the design and manufacturing of drug products, ensuring consumers receive high-quality products with a low risk of recall.

Extent of a valsartan drug shortage and its effect on antihypertensive drug use in the Canadian population: a national cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Drug shortages represent a growing global problem, with potentially serious consequences to patients and the health care system. Our study investigates the impacts of a major recall and shortage of valsartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), in July 2018 in Canada. METHODS: We conducted a time-series analysis of antihypertensive drugs dispensed in Canada between 2015 and 2019 using commercially available retail prescription data. Using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modelling, we evaluated the change in valsartan use after the recall. We also measured the overall use of ARBs, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and other antihypertensive drug classes for the same period. RESULTS: After the recall in July 2018, valsartan use decreased 57.8%, from 362 231 prescriptions dispensed in June 2018 to 152 892 in September 2018 (difference = 209 339, p < 0.0001). Overall use of the ARB drug class decreased 2.0%, from 1 577 509 prescriptions dispensed in June 2018 to 1 545 591 in September 2018 (difference = 31 918, p = 0.0003), but use of non-valsartan ARBs increased 14.6%, from 1 215 278 to 1 392 699 prescriptions dispensed (difference = 177 421, p < 0.0001) in the same time frame. Although use of ACE inhibitors initially declined, this reduction was not sustained. The valsartan recall was not associated with a significant impact on use of other antihypertensive drug classes. INTERPRETATION: Our findings illustrate the impact of a major drug shortage, with the immediate and substantial reduction of valsartan dispensed and cascading effects on other ARBs, though future research is warranted to understand the consequences of such extensive shortages on clinical outcomes and health system costs. Improved policy strategies are needed to address the underlying causes of drug shortages and to mitigate their effects.

The 'burn' of ranitidine recall: current insights and mitigation strategies.

Ranitidine was one of the most commonly used medications for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. On 1 April 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration requested all manufacturers to immediately withdraw ranitidine from the market because of concern of higher than acceptable levels of N-nitrosodimethylamine, a potential carcinogen. Herein, we highlight the reason for this recall, along with the effects of this recall on both the patients and healthcare practitioners, and offer insights on management strategies.

Critical Analysis of Drug Product Recalls due to Nitrosamine Impurities.

A product recall is the outcome of a careful pharmacovigilance; and it is an integral part of drug regulation. Among various reasons for product recall, the detection of unacceptable levels of carcinogenic impurities is one of the most serious concerns. The genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of N-nitrosamines raises a serious safety concern, and in September 2020, the FDA issued guidance for the pharmaceutical industry regarding the control of nitrosamines in drug products. The FDA database shows that >1400 product lots have been recalled from the market due to the presence of carcinogenic N-nitrosamine impurities at levels beyond the acceptable intake limit of 26.5 ng/day. The drugs that were present in recalled products include valsartan, irbesartan, losartan, metformin, ranitidine, and nizatidine. This perspective provides a critical account of these product recalls with an emphasis on the source and mechanism for the formation of N-nitrosamines in these products.