Self-Management Using eHealth Technologies for Liver Transplant Recipients: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation has become increasingly common as a last-resort treatment for end-stage liver diseases and liver cancer, with continually improving success rates and long-term survival rates. Nevertheless, liver transplant recipients face lifelong challenges in self-management, including immunosuppressant therapy, lifestyle adjustments, and navigating complex health care systems. eHealth technologies hold the potential to aid and optimize self-management outcomes, but their adoption has been slow in this population due to the complexity of post-liver transplant management. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the use of eHealth technologies in supporting self-management for liver transplant recipients and identify their benefits and challenges to suggest areas for further research. METHODS: Following the Arksey and O'Malley methodology for scoping reviews, we conducted a systematic search of 5 electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. We included studies that (1) examined or implemented eHealth-based self-management, (2) included liver transplant recipients aged ≥18 years, and (3) were published in a peer-reviewed journal. We excluded studies that (1) were case reports, conference abstracts, editorials, or letters; (2) did not focus on the posttransplantation phase; (3) did not focus on self-management; and (4) did not incorporate the concept of eHealth or used technology solely for data collection. The quality of the selected eHealth interventions was evaluated using (1) the Template for Intervention Description and Replication guidelines and checklist and (2) the 5 core self-management skills identified by Lorig and Holman. RESULTS: Of 1461 articles, 15 (1.03%) studies were included in the final analysis. Our findings indicate that eHealth-based self-management strategies for adult liver transplant recipients primarily address lifestyle management, medication adherence, and remote monitoring, highlighting a notable gap in alcohol relapse interventions. The studies used diverse technologies, including mobile apps, videoconferencing, and telehealth platforms, but showed limited integration of decision-making or resource use skills essential for comprehensive self-management. The reviewed studies highlighted the potential of eHealth in enhancing individualized health care, but only a few included collaborative features such as 2-way communication or tailored goal setting. While adherence and feasibility were generally high in many interventions, their effectiveness varied due to diverse methodologies and outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review maps the current literature on eHealth-based self-management support for liver transplant recipients, assessing its potential and challenges. Future studies should focus on developing predictive models and personalized eHealth interventions rooted in patient-generated data, incorporating digital human-to-human interactions to effectively address the complex needs of liver transplant recipients. This review emphasizes the need for future eHealth self-management research to address the digital divide, especially with the aging liver transplant recipient population, and ensure more inclusive studies across diverse ethnicities and regions.

Chronological and Geographical Variations in the Incidence and Acceptance of COVID-19-Positive Donors and Outcomes Among Abdominal Transplant Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Given the importance of understanding COVID-19-positive donor incidence and acceptance, we characterize chronological and geographic variations in COVID-19 incidence relative to COVID-19-positive donor acceptance. METHODS: Data on deceased donors and recipients of liver and kidney transplants were obtained from the UNOS database between 2020 and 2023. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to assess trends in COVID-19-positive donor incidence. Posttransplant graft and patient survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: From among 38 429 deceased donors, 1517 were COVID-19 positive. Fewer kidneys (72.4% vs. 76.5%, p < 0.001) and livers (56.4% vs. 62.0%, p < 0.001) were used from COVID-19-positive donors versus COVID-19-negative donors. Areas characterized by steadily increased COVID-19 donor incidence exhibit the highest transplantation acceptance rates (92.33%), followed by intermediate (84.62%) and rapidly increased (80.00%) COVID-19 incidence areas (p = 0.016). Posttransplant graft and patient survival was comparable among recipients, irrespective of donor COVID-19 status. CONCLUSIONS: Regions experiencing heightened rates of COVID-19-positive donors are associated with decreased acceptance of liver and kidney transplantation. Similar graft and patient survival is noted among recipients, irrespective of donor COVID-19 status. These findings emphasize the need for adaptive practices and unified medical consensus in navigating a dynamic pandemic.

Molecular epidemiology and risk factors associated with BK and JC polyomavirus urinary shedding after kidney allograft.

Polyomaviruses BK (BKPyV) and JC (JCPyV), belonging to the Polyomaviridae, are responsible for human pathologies. In kidney transplant recipients, BKPyV replication can lead to irreversible nephron damage whereas JCPyV replication remains asymptomatic. Concomitant replication is rare and potential competition between the infections has been described. The aim of this retrospective case-control study was to describe the molecular epidemiology and risk factors associated with BKPyV and JCPyV replication in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients. In total, 655 urine samples from 460 patients were tested for BKPyV and JCPyV DNA. Positive samples were submitted to strain genotyping. Demographic and clinical characteristics were also compared. Isolated JCPyV and BKPyV was found in 16.5% and 23.3% of patients, respectively; co-replication was rare (3.9%). BKPyV strains Ib-2, Ib-1, and IVc-2 were the most prevalent. JCPyV strains mostly belonged to genotypes 4 and 1B. During follow-up, JCPyV shedding significantly reduced the risk of BKPyV DNAuria, with an odds ratio of 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.99), and was associated with better prognosis than BKPyV replication, based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate. Molecular epidemiology of BKPyV and JCPyV strains in our region was similar to previous studies. This study suggests that JCPyV is benign and appears to limit damaging BKPyV replication. JCPyV DNAuria screening could thus be a useful strategy to predict BKPyV-related outcomes.

Comparison of prophylaxis and preemptive strategy as cytomegalovirus prevention in liver transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Prophylaxis (P) or pre-emptive strategy (PS) in high-risk liver transplant recipients (LTRs) are either recommended. We compared the results of each strategy. METHODS: Two groups of LTR transplanted during two consecutive periods were compared. Only cytomegalovirus (CMV)-mismatched LTR (Donor +/ Recipient -) were included. The primary endpoints were: the onset of polymerase chain reaction-based DNAemia and the proportion of patients with CMV disease. A number of episodes of CMV infection, antiviral therapy, ganciclovir resistance, infectious or immunological complications, cost of both strategies, and survival (1, 5, and 10 years) were also compared. RESULTS: Forty-eight and 60 patients were respectively included in the P and PS groups. Eighteen (38%) in the P group and 56 (93%) in the PS group had CMV DNAemia (p <.0001) with a similar CMV disease rate (16.7% and 15%). Duration of curative therapy was longer in the PS group: 91 days versus 16 (p <.0001). Acute rejection was less frequent (p = .04) and more patients experienced a ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection in the PS group (10% vs. 0, p = .03). The drug-associated cost of PS was higher (10 004 vs. 4804€) and the median number of rehospitalization days tended to be higher (6 vs. 4, p = .06). Survival at any time was similar. CONCLUSION: We reported more CMV DNAemias and ganciclovir-resistant CMV events with PS. The cost of the PS strategy was higher.

Endobiogenic Biology of Function Indices in a Cohort of Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Background and Objectives: Endobiogeny is a global systems approach to human biology based on the concept that the endocrine system manages the metabolism. Biology of function (BoF) indices are diagnostic tools in endobiogenic medicine that reflect the action of the endocrine system on the cells and the metabolic activity of an organism. Kidney transplant recipients are a very specific patient population due to their constant use of immunosuppressive agents such as steroids and anamnesis of chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to assess the tendencies of endobiogenic BoF indices in a kidney transplant recipient population and to determine the relationship between BoF index values and histology-proven kidney transplant rejection. Materials and Methods: A total of 117 kidney transplant recipients undergoing surveillance or indication allograft biopsy were included in this study. Endobiogenic BoF indices were calculated from complete blood count tests taken before the kidney biopsy. Histology samples were evaluated by an experienced pathologist according to the Banff classification system. Clinical and follow-up data were collected from an electronic patient medical record system. Results: Overall, <35% of the patients had BoF index values assumed to be normal, according to the general population data. Additionally, >50% of the patients had lower-than-normal adaptation, leucocyte mobilization, genital, and adjusted genital ratio indices, while the Cata-Ana, genito-thyroid ratio, adrenal gland, and cortisol indices were increased in >50% of the transplant recipients. The adaptation index was significantly higher in patients with biopsy-proven transplant rejection and demonstrated an AUC value of 0.649 (95%CI 0.540-0.759) for discriminating rejectors from patients without transplant rejection. Conclusions: Most of the kidney transplant recipients had abnormal BoF index values, reflecting increased corticotropic effects on their cells. The adaptation index distinguished patients with biopsy-proven transplant rejection from those without it.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia in solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a frequent complication of solid organ transplantation that adversely impacts both graft and recipient survival. There is a paucity of data on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in transplant recipients, particularly the long term outcomes. We conducted a study to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of pneumonia in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients to those in non-transplant (NT) recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical characteristics were abstracted from electronic medical records. Outcomes included time to hospital discharge, short and long-term mortality. Inverse-propensity score weights were assigned to account for between-group differences. Adjusted analysis included a weighted logistic regression. Results were reported as odds ratios with a corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 7449 patients were admitted with CAP. Patients were divided into two groups: SOT recipients 42 (0.56 %) and NT recipients 7396 (99.2 %). SOT recipients were younger, more commonly males, with higher prevalence of comorbidities. After accounting for inverse-propensity score weighting, the odds of mortality were higher in SOT recipients in hospital, at 30 days and at 1 year. The magnitude of increase in mortality for SOT recipients was greatest at 1 year with 1.41 (95 % CI: 1.38-1.44) times higher odds. CONCLUSION: In patients with CAP, SOT recipients are younger, more commonly male and have more co-morbidities compared with NT recipients. They also have higher 1 year mortality after adjustment. Clinicians must be vigilant toward the pronounced long-term mortality risk among these patients and ensure continued follow-up care for them.

Cancer risk in people living with HIV and solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systematic evaluations of cancer risk in people living with HIV or AIDS (PLHIV) and solid organ transplant recipients provide unique insights into the role of the immune system in cancer development. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we expand previous analyses of cancer risk for these two immunocompromised populations. METHODS: We considered studies published in English and listed on PubMed or Embase up to July 1, 2022. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they used population-based registries and compared cancer incidence in PLHIV or solid organ transplant recipients with the general population in the same geographical area. We extracted the number of observed site-specific cancers and expected cases and calculated meta-standardised incidence ratios for cancer within PLHIV and solid organ transplant recipients. In solid organ transplant recipients meta-standardised incidence ratios were compared by organ type. This project is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022366679. FINDINGS: 46 studies in PLHIV and 67 in solid organ transplant recipients were included in the analysis. Meta-standardised incidence ratios for cancers associated with human papillomavirus were increased in both populations; the highest meta-standardised incidence ratio in PLHIV was anal cancer (37·28 [95% CI 23·65-58·75], I2=97·4%), and in solid organ transplant recipients was cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (45·87 [31·70-66·38], I2=99·0%). Meta-standardised incidence ratios were significantly increased for most non-HPV viral-infection-related cancers in both populations; the highest standard incidence ratios were for Kaposi sarcoma (PLHIV: 801·52 [95% CI 200·25-3208·13], I2=100·0%; solid organ transplant recipients: 47·31 [23·09-96·95], I2=87·7%) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (32·53 [19·64-53·87], I2=99·8%; 10·24 [8·48-12·35], I2=94·9%). Eight types of cancer with no known viral cause showed an increased risk in solid organ transplant recipients only; no cancer type showed increased risk in PLHIV only. INTERPRETATION: Cancer risk was increased for a range of infection-related cancers in both PLHIV and solid organ transplant recipients, but divergent results in these and other cancers have emerged. The cancer risk patterns probably reflect variances in the degree of impaired immunity, exposure to carcinogenic viruses, and perhaps exposure to carcinogenic immunosuppressive agents. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.

"Long-term effects of center volume on transplant outcomes in adult kidney transplant recipients".

BACKGROUND: The influence of center volume on kidney transplant outcomes is a topic of ongoing debate. In this study, we employed competing risk analyses to accurately estimate the marginal probability of graft failure in the presence of competing events, such as mortality from other causes with long-term outcomes. The incorporation of immunosuppression protocols and extended follow-up offers additional insights. Our emphasis on long-term follow-up aligns with biological considerations where competing risks play a significant role. METHODS: We examined data from 219,878 adult kidney-only transplantations across 256 U.S. transplant centers (January 2001-December 2015) sourced from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry. Centers were classified into quartiles by annual volume: low (Q1 = 28), medium (Q2 = 75), medium-high (Q3 = 121), and high (Q4 = 195). Our study investigated the relationship between center volume and 5-year outcomes, focusing on graft failure and mortality. Sub-population analyses included deceased donors, living donors, diabetic recipients, those with kidney donor profile index >85%, and re-transplants from deceased donors. RESULTS: Adjusted cause-specific hazard ratios (aCHR) for Five-Year Graft Failure and Patient Death were examined by center volume, with low-volume centers as the reference standard (aCHR: 1.0). In deceased donors, medium-high and high-volume centers showed significantly lower cause-specific hazard ratios for graft failure (medium-high aCHR = 0.892, p<0.001; high aCHR = 0.953, p = 0.149) and patient death (medium-high aCHR = 0.828, p<0.001; high aCHR = 0.898, p = 0.003). Among living donors, no significant differences were found for graft failure, while a trend towards lower cause-specific hazard ratios for patient death was observed in medium-high (aCHR = 0.895, p = 0.107) and high-volume centers (aCHR = 0.88, p = 0.061). CONCLUSION: Higher center volume is associated with significantly lower cause-specific hazard ratios for graft failure and patient death in deceased donors, while a trend towards reduced cause-specific hazard ratios for patient death is observed in living donors.

Lung Donation and Transplant Recipient Outcomes at Independent vs Hospital-Based Donor Care Units.

Importance: Centralizing deceased organ donor management and organ recovery into donor care units (DCUs) may mitigate the critical organ shortage by positively impacting donation and recipient outcomes. Objective: To compare donation and lung transplant outcomes between 2 common DCU models: independent (outside of acute-care hospitals) and hospital-based. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective cohort study of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network deceased donor registry and lung transplant recipient files from 21 US donor service areas with an operating DCU. Characteristics and lung donation rates among deceased donors cared for in independent vs hospital-based DCUs were compared. Eligible participants included deceased organ donors (aged 16 years and older) after brain death, who underwent organ recovery procedures between April 26, 2017, and June 30, 2022, and patients who received lung transplants from those donors. Data analysis was conducted from May 2023 to March 2024. Exposure: Organ recovery in an independent DCU (vs hospital-based DCU). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was duration of transplanted lung survival (through December 31, 2023) among recipients of lung(s) transplanted from cohort donors. A Cox proportional hazards model stratified by transplant year and program, adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics was used to compare graft survival. Results: Of 10 856 donors in the starting sample (mean [SD] age, 42.8 [15.2] years; 6625 male [61.0%] and 4231 female [39.0%]), 5149 (primary comparison group) underwent recovery procedures in DCUs including 1466 (28.4%) in 11 hospital-based DCUs and 3683 (71.5%) in 10 independent DCUs. Unadjusted lung donation rates were higher in DCUs than local hospitals, but lower in hospital-based vs independent DCUs (418 donors [28.5%] vs 1233 donors [33.5%]; P < .001). Among 1657 transplant recipients, 1250 (74.5%) received lung(s) from independent DCUs. Median (range) duration of follow-up after transplant was 734 (0-2292) days. Grafts recovered from independent DCUs had shorter restricted mean (SE) survival times than grafts from hospital-based DCUs (1548 [27] days vs 1665 [50] days; P = .04). After adjustment, graft failure remained higher among lungs recovered from independent DCUs than hospital-based DCUs (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.28-2.65). Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective analysis of national donor and transplant recipient data, although lung donation rates were higher from deceased organ donors after brain death cared for in independent DCUs, lungs recovered from donors in hospital-based DCUs survived longer. These findings suggest that further work is necessary to understand which factors (eg, donor transfer, management, or lung evaluation and acceptance practices) differ between DCU models and may contribute to these differences.

Effect of recipient age on prioritisation for liver transplantation in the UK: a population-based modelling study.

BACKGROUND: Following the introduction of an algorithm aiming to maximise life-years gained from liver transplantation in the UK (the transplant benefit score [TBS]), donor livers were redirected from younger to older patients, mortality rate equalised across the age range and short-term waiting list mortality reduced. Understanding age-related prioritisation has been challenging, especially for younger patients and clinicians allocating non-TBS-directed livers. We aimed to assess age-related prioritisation within the TBS algorithm by modelling liver transplantation prioritisation based on data from a UK transplant unit and comparing these data with other regions. METHODS: In this population-based modelling study, serum parameters and age at liver transplantation assessment of patients attending the Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Edinburgh, UK, between December, 2002, and November, 2023, were combined with representative synthetic data to model TBS survival predictions, which were compared according to age group (25-49 years vs ≥60 years), chronic liver disease severity, and disease cause. Models for end-stage liver disease (UKELD [UK], MELD [Eurotransplant region], and MELD 3.0 [USA]) were used as validated comparators of liver disease severity. FINDINGS: Of 2093 patients with chronic liver disease, 1808 (86%) had complete datasets and liver disease parameters consistent with eligibility for the liver transplant waiting list in the UK (UKELD ≥49). Disease severity as assessed by UKELD, MELD, and MELD 3.0 did not differ by age (median UKELD scores of 56 for patients aged ≥60 years vs 56 for patients aged 25-49 years; MELD scores of 16 vs 16; and MELD 3.0 scores of 18 vs 18). TBS increased with advancing age (R=0·45, p<0·0001). TBS predicted that transplantation in patients aged 60 years or older would provide a two-fold greater net benefit at 5 years than in patients aged 25-49 years (median TBS 1317 [IQR 1116-1436] in older patients vs 706 [411-1095] in younger patients; p<0·0001). Older patients were predicted to have shorter survival without transplantation than younger patients (263 days [IQR 144-473] in older patients vs 861 days [448-1164] in younger patients; p<0·0001) but similar survival after transplantation (1599 days [1563-1628] vs 1573 days [1525-1614]; p<0·0001). Older patients could reach a TBS for which a liver offer was likely below minimum criteria for transplantation (UKELD <49), whereas many younger patients were required to have high-urgent disease (UKELD >60). US and Eurotransplant programmes did not prioritise according to age. INTERPRETATION: The UK liver allocation algorithm prioritises older patients for transplantation by predicting that advancing age increases the benefit from liver transplantation. Restricted follow-up and biases in waiting list data might limit the accuracy of these benefit predictions. Measures beyond overall waiting list mortality are required to fully capture the benefits of liver transplantation. FUNDING: None.

Quality of life and its association with predictors in lung transplant recipients: a latent profile analysis.

Backgrounds: Improving quality of life (QOL) is one of the main aims of lung transplantation (LTx). There is a need to identify those who have poor quality of life early. However, research addressing inter individual quality of life variability among them is lacking. This study aims to identify group patterns in quality of life among lung transplant recipients and examine the predictors associated with quality of life subgroups. Methods: In total, 173 lung transplant recipients were recruited from one hospital in Guangdong Province between September 2022 and August 2023. They were assessed using the Lung Transplant Quality of Life scale (LT-QOL), Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), Life Orientation Test-Revised scale (LOT-R), and Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS). Latent profile analysis was used to identify QOL subtypes, and logistic regression analysis was used to examine the associations between latent profiles and sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics. Results: Two distinct QOL profiles were identified: "low HRQOL" profile [N = 53 (30.94%)] and "high HRQOL" profile [N = 120 (69.06%)]. Single lung transplant recipients, and patients who reported post-transplant infection, high levels of negative emotion or low levels of mindfulness and optimism were significantly correlated with the low QOL subgroup. Conclusion: Using the domains of the LT-QOL scale, two profiles were identified among the lung transplant recipients. Our findings highlighted that targeted intervention should be developed based on the characteristics of each latent class, and timely attention must be paid to patients who have undergone single lung transplantation, have had a hospital readmission due to infection, exhibit low levels of optimism, low levels of mindfulness or high negative emotions.

Clinical characteristics of liver transplant recipients with COVID-19 and analysis of risk factors for the severe disease.

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplant (LT) recipients were at a high risk of infection during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Our purpose was to compare the clinical characteristics of severe and non-severe groups of LT recipients with COVID-19, and to analyze their risk factors for severe disease. METHODOLOGY: 79 LT recipients with COVID-19 were divided into a non-severe group (n = 60) and a severe group (n = 19), and differences in clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, and chest computed tomography (CT) performance were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors with severe COVID-19. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and the area under curve (AUC) values were calculated to assess the predictive value for severe COVID-19. RESULTS: Age was statistically different (p < 0.001) between the two groups. The difference in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), serum creatinine (Scr), D-dimer, urea, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and the number of lung segments involved in inflammation between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The results revealed that age (OR = 1.255, 95% CI 1.079-1.460), NLR (OR = 1.172, 95% CI 1.019-1.348), and Scr (OR = 1.041, 95% CI 1.016-1.066) were independent risk factors for severe COVID-19. The ROC results showed that high values for age, NLR and Scr predicted severe COVID-19, with AUC values of 0.775, 0.841 and 0.820, respectively, and 0.925 for the three factors combined. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age, and elevated NLR and Scr are independent risk factors for severe COVID-19 in LT recipients.

Characteristics and clinical manifestations of patients, including organ transplant patients, during the surge of JN.1: Insights from Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Amidst the persistent global health threat posed by the evolving SARS-CoV-2 virus throughout the four-year-long COVID-19 pandemic, the focus has now turned to the Omicron variant and its subvariant, JN.1, which has rapidly disseminated worldwide. This study reports on the characteristics and clinical manifestations of patients during the surge of the JN.1 variant in Saudi Arabia; it also investigates the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants in organ transplant patients and identifies patient risk factors. METHODS: A total of 151 nasopharyngeal samples from patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were collected between September 2023 and January 2024. Demographic and clinical data of the patients were obtained from electronic health records. All confirmed positive samples underwent sequencing using Ion GeneStudio and the Ion AmpliSeq™ SARS-CoV-2 panel. RESULTS: During the surge of the JN.1 variant, the average age of the patients was 40 years, ranging from 3 to 93 years, and nearly 50% of the patients were male. Our investigation revealed that the J.N variant predominantly infected patients with comorbidities or organ transplant recipients (57.6%). Moreover, patients with comorbidities or organ transplants exhibited a higher number of mutations. In our organ transplant cohort, an increased total number of spike mutations was associated with a lower risk of developing severe disease (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Although JN.1 may not prove to be particularly harmful, it is crucial to recognize the persistent emergence of concerning variants, which create new pathways for the virus to evolve. The ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 is evident in the continuous divergence of these variants from the original strain that marked the onset of the pandemic nearly four years ago.

Impact of Asian and Black Donor and Recipient Ethnicity on the Outcomes After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United Kingdom.

Patients of Asian and black ethnicity face disadvantage on the renal transplant waiting list in the UK, because of lack of human leucocyte antigen and blood group matched donors from an overwhelmingly white deceased donor pool. This study evaluates outcomes of renal allografts from Asian and black donors. The UK Transplant Registry was analysed for adult deceased donor kidney only transplants performed between 2001 and 2015. Asian and black ethnicity patients constituted 12.4% and 6.7% of all deceased donor recipients but only 1.6% and 1.2% of all deceased donors, respectively. Unadjusted survival analysis demonstrated significantly inferior long-term allograft outcomes associated with Asian and black donors, compared to white donors. On Cox-regression analysis, Asian donor and black recipient ethnicities were associated with poorer outcomes than white counterparts, and on ethnicity matching, compared with the white donor-white recipient baseline group and adjusting for other donor and recipient factors, 5-year graft outcomes were significantly poorer for black donor-black recipient, Asian donor-white recipient, and white donor-black recipient combinations in decreasing order of worse unadjusted 5-year graft survival. Increased deceased donation among ethnic minorities could benefit the recipient pool by increasing available organs. However, it may require a refined approach to enhance outcomes.

Burden and frequency of viral testing of kidney and non-kidney transplant recipients.

Transplant patients are at risk of infections due to long-term immunosuppression contributing to morbidity and mortality in this population. Post-transplant testing guidelines were established to monitor and guide therapeutic interventions in transplant recipients. We hypothesize that there are gaps in adherence to the recommended frequency of laboratory testing in post-transplant patients. We analyzed national reference laboratory data to compare viral post-transplant infection (PTI) testing frequency with their respective published guidelines to understand patient uptake and compliance. We evaluated the ordering patterns, positivity rates, and frequency of molecular infectious disease tests (MIDTs). We included 345 patients with International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes for transplant (Z940-Z942, Z944, Z9481, Z9483, Z9484) with at least two tests (within 7 days) in January 2019 and at least one test in December 2020 to find patients in the post-transplant period. We analyzed two cohorts: kidney transplant recipients (KTRs; 40%) and non-KTR (60%) then followed them longitudinally for the study period. In KTR cohort, high-to-low proportion of ordered MIDT was blood BK virus (bBKV) followed by cytomegalovirus (CMV); in non-KTR cohort, CMV was followed by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). KTR cohort positivity was highest for urine BK virus (uBKV; 58%) followed by EBV (46%), bBKV (40%), and CMV (31%). Non-KTR cohort positivity was highest for uBKV (64%), EBV (51%), CMV (30%), bBKV (8%), and adenovirus (7%). All patients were tested at progressively longer intervals from the date of the first post-transplant ICD-10-coded test. More than 40% of the KTR cohort were tested less frequently for EBV and bBKV, and more than 20% of the non-KTR cohort were tested for EBV less frequently than published guidelines 4 months after transplant. Despite regular testing, the results of MIDT testing for KTR and non-KTR patients in the post-transplant period are not aligned with published guidelines.IMPORTANCEGuidance for post-transplant infectious disease testing is established, however, for certain infections it allows for clinician discretion. This leads to transplant center policies developing their own testing/surveillance strategies based on their specific transplant patient population (kidney, stem cell, etc.). The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) has developed a strategic plan to improve and standardize the transplant process in the US to improve outcomes of living donors and recipients. Publishing national reference lab data on the testing frequency and its alignment with the recommended guidelines for post-transplant infectious diseases can inform patient uptake and compliance for these strategic OPTN efforts.

Effect of preservation fluid contamination and associated possible donor-derived infections on early postoperative prognosis in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The study aims to analyze the epidemiology of preservation fluid (PF) contamination and investigate the impact of PF contamination and possible donor-derived infections(p-DDI) on early postoperative prognosis in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. METHODS: A total of 256 PF samples were collected for microbiological evaluation from all KT recipients who received deceased donor donations in our hospital from June 2018 to August 2022. Data on the baseline and clinical characteristics of these PF corresponding to recipients and donors were extracted from the electronic medical record. It mainly included the early postoperative complications and prognosis of KT recipients. RESULTS: From June 2018 to August 2022, 597 kidney transplants were performed in our center, with 260 recipients receiving kidney transplantation from donation after citizens' death. A total of 256 samples of PF were collected, of which 64.5% (165/256) were culture positive, and 24.6% (63/165) of the culture-positive PF were polymicrobial contamination. A total of 238 strains were isolated, of which coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) had the highest proportion of 34.0% (81/238), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae with 20.6% (49/238) and Escherichia coli with 8.8% (21/238). Recipients with culture-positive PF had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative infection (55.8% vs. 20.9%, P < 0.001) and DGF (38.2% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.023). In addition, the incidence of p-DDI was 12.9% (33/256). CRKP was the most common pathogen causing p-DDI. The recipients who developed p-DDI had a higher rate of graft loss (9.1% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001), mortality (12.1% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.018), and longer postoperative hospital stay (30 days (19.5-73.5) vs. (22 days (18-32), P < 0.05) compared with recipients who did not develop p-DDI. CONCLUSIONS: Culture-positive PF is potentially significant for KT recipients, and p-DDI may increase the risk of poor prognosis for recipients. Prophylactic anti-infective treatment should be actively performed for highly virulent or multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens (especially Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, CRKP) in PF to avoid the occurrence of p-DDI.