Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Toxinas Bacterianas/genética , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Clostridioides difficile/clasificación , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Colonoscopía , Medios de Cultivo , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/diagnóstico , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/microbiología , Enterotoxinas/genética , Humanos , Fenotipo , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Ribotipificación/métodos , Ribotipificación/normasRESUMEN
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains poorly controlled in many European countries, of which several have not yet implemented national CDI surveillance. In 2013, experts from the European CDI Surveillance Network project and from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control developed a protocol with three options of CDI surveillance for acute care hospitals: a 'minimal' option (aggregated hospital data), a 'light' option (including patient data for CDI cases) and an 'enhanced' option (including microbiological data on the first 10 CDI episodes per hospital). A total of 37 hospitals in 14 European countries tested these options for a three-month period (between 13 May and 1 November 2013). All 37 hospitals successfully completed the minimal surveillance option (for 1,152 patients). Clinical data were submitted for 94% (1,078/1,152) of the patients in the light option; information on CDI origin and outcome was complete for 94% (1,016/1,078) and 98% (294/300) of the patients in the light and enhanced options, respectively. The workload of the options was 1.1, 2.0 and 3.0 person-days per 10,000 hospital discharges, respectively. Enhanced surveillance was tested and was successful in 32 of the hospitals, showing that C. difficile PCR ribotype 027 was predominant (30% (79/267)). This study showed that standardised multicountry surveillance, with the option of integrating clinical and molecular data, is a feasible strategy for monitoring CDI in Europe.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/normas , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Ribotipificación/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infections of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato reveal clinical manifestations affecting numerous organs and tissues. The standard diagnostic procedure of these infections is quite simple if a positive history of tick exposure or typical erythema migrans appears. Lack of unequivocal clinical symptoms creates the necessity for further evaluation with laboratory tests. OBJECTIVES: This study discusses the utility of a novel, improved, well-optimized, sensitive and highly specific quantitative real-time PCR assay for the diagnostics of infections caused by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We designed an improved, specific, highly sensitive real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) assay for the detection and quantification of all Borrelia burgdorferi genotypes. A wide validation effort was undertaken to ensure confidence in the highly sensitive and specific detection of B. burgdorferi. RESULTS: Due to high sensitivity and great specificity, as low as 1.6×10² copies of Borrelia per mL of whole blood could be detected. As much as 12 (3%) negative ELISA IgM results, 14 (2.8%) negative results of Line blot IgM, 11 (3.1%) and 7 (2.7%) of negative ELISA IgG and Line blot IgG results, respectively, were positive in real-time PCR. CONCLUSIONS: The data in this study confirms the high positive predictive value of real-time PCR test in the detection of Borrelia infections.
Asunto(s)
Borrelia burgdorferi/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Enfermedad de Lyme/diagnóstico , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Ribotipificación/métodos , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Borrelia burgdorferi/clasificación , Borrelia burgdorferi/inmunología , Calibración , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Incidencia , Enfermedad de Lyme/sangre , Enfermedad de Lyme/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Lyme/microbiología , Polonia/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/normas , Estándares de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Ribotipificación/normas , Pruebas SerológicasRESUMEN
PCR-ribotyping has been adopted in many laboratories as the method of choice for C. difficile typing and surveillance. However, issues with the conventional agarose gel-based technique, including inter-laboratory variation and interpretation of banding patterns have impeded progress. The method has recently been adapted to incorporate high-resolution capillary gel-based electrophoresis (CE-ribotyping), so improving discrimination, accuracy and reproducibility. However, reports to date have all represented single-centre studies and inter-laboratory variability has not been formally measured or assessed. Here, we achieved in a multi-centre setting a high level of reproducibility, accuracy and portability associated with a consensus CE-ribotyping protocol. Local databases were built at four participating laboratories using a distributed set of 70 known PCR-ribotypes. A panel of 50 isolates and 60 electronic profiles (blinded and randomized) were distributed to each testing centre for PCR-ribotype identification based on local databases generated using the standard set of 70 PCR-ribotypes, and the performance of the consensus protocol assessed. A maximum standard deviation of only ±3.8bp was recorded in individual fragment sizes, and PCR-ribotypes from 98.2% of anonymised strains were successfully discriminated across four ribotyping centres spanning Europe and North America (98.8% after analysing discrepancies). Consensus CE-ribotyping increases comparability of typing data between centres and thereby facilitates the rapid and accurate transfer of standardized typing data to support future national and international C. difficile surveillance programs.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/clasificación , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Electroforesis Capilar/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Ribotipificación/métodos , ADN Intergénico , Electroforesis Capilar/normas , Humanos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/normas , ARN Ribosómico/genética , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Ribotipificación/normasRESUMEN
Species of Acanthamoeba were first described using morphological characters including cyst structure and cytology of nuclear division. More than 20 nominal species were proposed using these methods. Morphology, especially cyst shape and size, has proven to be plastic and dependent upon culture conditions. The DNA sequence of the nuclear small-subunit (18S) rRNA, the Rns gene, has become the most widely accepted method for rapid diagnosis and classification of Acanthamoeba. The Byers-Fuerst lab first proposed an Rns typing system in 1996. Subsequent refinements, with an increasing DNA database and analysis of diagnostic fragments within the gene, have become widely accepted by the Acanthamoeba research community. The development of the typing system, including its current state of implementation is illustrated by three cases: (i) the division between sequence types T13 and T16; (ii) the diversity within sequence supertype T2/T6, and (iii) verification of a new sequence type, designated T20. Molecular studies make clear the disconnection between phylogenetic relatedness and species names, as applied for the genus Acanthamoeba. Future reconciliation of genetic types with species names must become a priority, but the possible shortcomings of the use of a single gene when reconstructing the evolutionary history of the acanthamoebidae must also be resolved.
Asunto(s)
Acanthamoeba/genética , ADN Protozoario/genética , Genes de ARNr , Filogenia , ARN Ribosómico 18S/genética , Ribotipificación/normas , Acanthamoeba/clasificación , Bases de Datos Genéticas , Evolución Molecular , Variación Genética , Ribotipificación/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Terminología como AsuntoRESUMEN
Typing of Clostridium difficile facilitates understanding of the epidemiology of the infection. Some evaluations have shown that certain strain types (for example, ribotype 027) are more virulent than others and are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Although restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis have been widely used in the past, PCR ribotyping is the current method of choice for typing of C. difficile. However, global standardization of ribotyping results is urgently needed. Whole-genome sequencing of C. difficile has the potential to provide even greater epidemiologic information than ribotyping.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/clasificación , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Ribotipificación/métodos , Ribotipificación/normas , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Humanos , Epidemiología Molecular/métodos , Epidemiología Molecular/normas , ProhibitinasRESUMEN
Principles and guidelines are presented to ensure a solid scientific standard of papers dealing with the taxonomy of taxa of Pasteurellaceae Pohl 1981. The classification of the Pasteurellaceae is in principle based on a polyphasic approach. DNA sequencing of certain genes is very important for defining the borders of a taxon. However, the characteristics that are common to all members of the taxon and which might be helpful for separating it from related taxa must also be identified. Descriptions have to be based on as many strains as possible (inclusion of at least five strains is highly desirable), representing different sources with respect to geography and ecology, to allow proper characterization both phenotypically and genotypically, to establish the extent of diversity of the cluster to be named. A genus must be monophyletic based on 16S rRNA gene sequence-based phylogenetic analysis. Only in very rare cases is it acceptable that monophyly can not be achieved by 16S rRNA gene sequence comparison. Recently, the monophyly of genera has been confirmed by sequence comparison of housekeeping genes. In principle, a new genus should be recognized by a distinct phenotype, and characters that separate the new genus from its neighbours should be given clearly. Due to the overall importance of accurate classification of species, at least two genotypic methods are needed to show coherence and for separation at the species level. The main criterion for the classification of a novel species is that it forms a monophyletic group based on 16S rRNA gene sequence-based phylogenetic analysis. However, some groups might also include closely related species. In these cases, more sensitive tools for genetic recognition of species should be applied, such as DNA-DNA hybridizations. The comparison of housekeeping gene sequences has recently been used for genotypic definition of species. In order to separate species, phenotypic characters must also be identified to recognize them, and at least two phenotypic differences from existing species should be identified if possible. We recommend the use of the subspecies category only for subgroups associated with disease or similar biological characteristics. At the subspecies level, the genotypic groups must always be nested within the boundaries of an existing species. Phenotypic cohesion must be documented at the subspecies level and separation between subspecies and related species must be fully documented, as well as association with particular disease and host. An overview of methods previously used to characterize isolates of the Pasteurellaceae has been given. Genotypic and phenotypic methods are separated in relation to tests for investigating diversity and cohesion and to separate taxa at the level of genus as well as species and subspecies.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/normas , Pasteurellaceae/clasificación , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/normas , Genotipo , Hibridación de Ácido Nucleico , Pasteurellaceae/genética , Pasteurellaceae/fisiología , Fenotipo , Filogenia , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/normas , Polimorfismo de Longitud del Fragmento de Restricción , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Técnica del ADN Polimorfo Amplificado Aleatorio/normas , Estándares de Referencia , Ribotipificación/normas , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Especificidad de la EspecieRESUMEN
Fifty isolates of the most common UK strain of Clostridium difficile [polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotype 001] were analysed by three PCR-based typing methods in order to determine genomic diversity within this strain that may form the basis of a subtyping method. The three methods used were repetitive extragenic palindromic elements (REP), conserved repetitive DNA elements (BOX), and enterobacterial repetitive PCR intergenic consensus sequences (ERIC). The performance of each typing method was assessed by comparing powers of discrimination, typeability and reproducibility. All methods had satisfactory levels of typeability and reproducibility as determined by blind-coded repeats, but REP-PCR typing proved to be the most discriminatory method, yielding seven distinct amplicon profiles consisting of up to eight major bands. BOX-PCR generated between two and five major amplicons with four distinct BOX profiles. ERIC-PCR primers, however, could not discriminate between isolates. These results suggest that PCR ribotype 001 is not clonal in nature at present, and that REP-PCR subtyping methods offer promise to further our understanding of the epidemiology of C. difficile PCR ribotype 001 disease in UK hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/genética , Dermatoglifia del ADN/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Ribotipificación/métodos , Bélgica/epidemiología , Clostridioides difficile/clasificación , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Secuencia de Consenso/genética , Dermatoglifia del ADN/normas , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , ADN Bacteriano/genética , ADN Intergénico/genética , Análisis Discriminante , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Variación Genética/genética , Genoma Bacteriano , Genotipo , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Irlanda del Norte/epidemiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/normas , Secuencias Repetitivas de Ácidos Nucleicos/genética , Ribotipificación/normas , Método Simple Ciego , Especificidad de la Especie , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Many molecular typing methods are difficult to interpret because their repeatability (within-laboratory variance) and reproducibility (between-laboratory variance) have not been thoroughly studied. In the present work, ribotyping of coryneform bacteria was the basis of a study involving within-gel and between-gel repeatability and between-laboratory reproducibility (two laboratories involved). The effect of different technical protocols, different algorithms, and different software for fragment size determination was studied. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed, within a laboratory, that there was no significant added variance between gels. However, between-laboratory variance was significantly higher than within-laboratory variance. This may be due to the use of different protocols. An experimental function was calculated to transform the data and make them compatible (i.e., erase the between-laboratory variance). The use of different interpolation algorithms (spline, Schaffer and Sederoff) was a significant source of variation in one laboratory only. The use of either Taxotron (Institut Pasteur) or GelCompar (Applied Maths) was not a significant source of added variation when the same algorithm (spline) was used. However, the use of Bio-Gene (Vilber Lourmat) dramatically increased the error (within laboratory, within gel) in one laboratory, while decreasing the error in the other laboratory; this might be due to automatic normalization attempts. These results were taken into account for building a database and performing automatic pattern identification using Taxotron. Conversion of the data considerably improved the identification of patterns irrespective of the laboratory in which the data were obtained.
Asunto(s)
Ribotipificación/métodos , Algoritmos , Arthrobacter/genética , Citrobacter/genética , ADN Bacteriano/química , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Electroforesis en Gel de Agar , Hibridación de Ácido Nucleico , ARN Ribosómico/química , ARN Ribosómico/genética , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Ribotipificación/normas , Programas Informáticos/normasRESUMEN
The nomenclature of Corynebacterium diphtheriae ribotypes is presented. A total of 86 ribotypes obtained after BstEII digestion were given a geographic name chosen to reflect the place where one of the strains was isolated or studied.
Asunto(s)
Corynebacterium diphtheriae/genética , Ribotipificación/métodos , Terminología como Asunto , Algoritmos , Corynebacterium diphtheriae/clasificación , Desoxirribonucleasas de Localización Especificada Tipo II/metabolismo , Ribotipificación/normas , Programas InformáticosRESUMEN
In this study, 97 epidemiologically unrelated Shigella flexneri strains isolated during 1994 (69 isolates) and 1997 (28 isolates) were characterised by ribotyping, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence-based PCR typing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Number of strains belonging to each of the six serotypes is selected equal to their distribution in Romania. The isolates comprise 24 ribotypes based on combination of two restriction patterns obtained with HindlII and PstI, respectively, 7 enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC)-PCR types, and 92 XbaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns grouped in 31 pulsotypes at Dice coefficients of 85% similarity. We find no significant difference in the distribution of isolates collected during the two periods. Macrorestriction analysis by PFGE offers maximal discrimination. There seems to be little genetic variability among circulating S. flexneri strains of serotype 2a, suggesting that even a combination of several molecular techniques, including PFGE, could not easily differentiate an outbreak strain from temporally associated independent isolates.
Asunto(s)
Dermatoglifia del ADN/métodos , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Disentería Bacilar/microbiología , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Polimorfismo de Longitud del Fragmento de Restricción , Ribotipificación/métodos , Shigella flexneri/genética , Dermatoglifia del ADN/normas , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , Desoxirribonucleasas de Localización Especificada Tipo II , Análisis Discriminante , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Disentería Bacilar/epidemiología , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/normas , Variación Genética/genética , Genotipo , Humanos , Epidemiología Molecular , Filogenia , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/normas , Ribotipificación/normas , Rumanía/epidemiología , Serotipificación/métodos , Serotipificación/normas , Metiltransferasa de ADN de Sitio Específico (Adenina Especifica)RESUMEN
Bovine mastitis Staphylococcus aureus isolates and prototypic live-attenuated vaccine strains were analyzed by SmaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing and automated ribotyping. The discriminatory index of these methods was 0.91 and 0.69, respectively. SmaI PFGE typing assigned all laboratory strains into cluster Q, which shared 49% similarity with clusters A and B, and 35% similarity with cluster C. Automated ribotyping placed laboratory strains within ribogroups different from those of bovine isolates. These methods have 70% concordance and permitted identification of the prototypic vaccine background from those of clinical isolates. This information is required before conducting field trials with the vaccine.
Asunto(s)
Mastitis Bovina/microbiología , Ribotipificación/métodos , Ribotipificación/normas , Staphylococcus aureus/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Vacunas Atenuadas/clasificación , Vacunas Atenuadas/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Bovinos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Evolución Molecular , Genotipo , Epidemiología Molecular/métodos , Epidemiología Molecular/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Mapeo Restrictivo , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Vacunas Atenuadas/genéticaRESUMEN
Staphylococcus aureus is the most prevalent pathogen causing mastitis of dairy ruminants. This study was developed to ascertain the genotypes and genealogical relationship among strains isolated from milk of bovines with mastitis in Argentina. Molecular epidemiological analysis of S. aureus was performed on 112 isolates from 21 districts. Clonality was assessed by SmaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing, automated EcoRI ribotyping and restriction enzyme analysis of plasmid (REAP) DNA profiles. A total of 22 band patterns distributed in four clusters were found by SmaI PFGE analysis. The similarity of clusters 2, 3 and 4 with cluster 1 was 0.73, 0.69 and 0.33, respectively, and 101 of 112 isolates belonged in cluster 1. PFGE band patterns from 42 isolates within cluster I were indistinguishable from each other (type A). The second largest group of isolates with indistinguishable PFGE band patterns was subtype A11, which was composed of 19 isolates. Automated ribotyping assigned the 112 isolates into 13 ribotypes. Among these, the most prevalent ribotypes I and VI were composed of 49 and 35 isolates respectively. Although there was certain correspondence between PFGE genotypes and ribotypes, further discrimination was achieved by combining both methods. REAP DNA profile analysis was useful to provide even further discrimination between isolates with identical PFGE genotype and ribotype. The most prevalent S. aureus strains A/I and A11/VI were widely distributed in the country and were not restricted to individual nearby locations. Prevalence of these two strains varied consecutively within a period of 8 years. Whether the shift in type prevalence was due to selection of a phenotypic trait remains undisclosed.