Outcomes of biological therapy in patients with severe asthma with chronic rhinosinusitis in Saudi Arabia: patients with nasal polyps versus those without nasal polyps.

BACKGROUND: This study's purposes were to evaluate the impact of biological therapies on outcomes in patients with severe asthma (SA) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and to compare these effects among those with NP (CRSwNP) versus those without NP (CRSsNP) in the "real-world" setting in Saudi Arabian patients. METHODS: From March to September 2022, a retrospective observational cohort study was undertaken at the severe asthma clinics of the Armed Forces Hospital-Southern Region (AFHSR) and King Khalid University Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia, to delineate the effects of dupilumab therapy. Outcomes were assessed, including clinical outcomes, FEV1, and laboratory findings before and one year after dupilumab. Post-therapy effects were compared between CRSwNP and CRSsNP. RESULTS: Fifty subjects were enrolled, with a mean age of 46.56. There were 27 (54%) females and 23(46%) males. Significant improvements in clinical parameters (frequency of asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations, the use of OCs, anosmia, SNOTT-22, and the ACT), FEV1, and laboratory ones (serum IgE and eosinophilic count) were observed 6 and 12 months after using dupilumab (p < 0.001), respectively. However, after 12 months of dupilumab therapy, there were no significant differences between those with and without NP with regards to clinical (anosmia, ACT, and OCs use), laboratory (eosinophilic count, serum IgE level) parameters, and FEV1%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRS experienced significant improvements in clinical, FEV1, and laboratory outcomes after dupilumab therapy. However, these improvements were not maintained when comparing CRSwNP with CRSsNP. There were no significant differences between those with and without NP regarding ACT and OCs use or laboratory (eosinophilic count, serum IgE level) parameters. Further prospective multicenter studies are warranted.

Activation of the PGE2-EP2 pathway as a potential drug target for treating eosinophilic rhinosinusitis.

Current treatments of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) involve corticosteroids with various adverse effects and costly therapies such as dupilumab, highlighting the need for improved treatments. However, because of the lack of a proper mouse ECRS model that recapitulates human ECRS, molecular mechanisms underlying this disease are incompletely understood. ECRS is often associated with aspirin-induced asthma, suggesting that dysregulation of lipid mediators in the nasal mucosa may underlie ECRS pathology. We herein found that the expression of microsomal PGE synthase-1 (encoded by PTGES) was significantly lower in the nasal mucosa of ECRS patients than that of non-ECRS subjects. Histological, transcriptional, and lipidomics analyses of Ptges-deficient mice revealed that defective PGE2 biosynthesis facilitated eosinophil recruitment into the nasal mucosa, elevated expression of type-2 cytokines and chemokines, and increased pro-allergic and decreased anti-allergic lipid mediators following challenges with Aspergillus protease and ovalbumin. A nasal spray containing agonists for the PGE2 receptor EP2 or EP4, including omidenepag isopropyl that has been clinically used for treatment of glaucoma, markedly reduced intranasal eosinophil infiltration in Ptges-deficient mice. These results suggest that the present model using Ptges-deficient mice is more relevant to human ECRS than are previously reported models and that eosinophilic inflammation in the nasal mucosa can be efficiently blocked by activation of the PGE2-EP2 pathway. Furthermore, our findings suggest that drug repositioning of omidenepag isopropyl may be useful for treatment of patients with ECRS.

Sinonasal immunoglobulin G4-related disease: a case report of an atypical and rare entity.

BACKGROUND: Immunoglobulin G4-related disease is marked by extensive inflammation and fibrosis of an unknown autoimmune component, with an overall incidence ranging from 0.78 to 1.39 per 105 person-years. Sinonasal immunoglobulin G4-related disease is atypical and exceedingly uncommon in the existing literature, frequently manifesting clinically as chronic rhinosinusitis, epistaxis, and facial pain. CASE PRESENTATION: This report describes a 25-year-old Iraqi female who has been suffering from symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis for 8 years. Despite undergoing several surgeries, there has been no improvement in her symptoms. A tissue biopsy that revealed dense lymphoplasmocytosis with noticeable plasma cell infiltration, storiform fibrosis, and obliterative angitis, along with positive immunohistochemical staining for Immunoglobulin G4 plasma cells, finally confirmed the diagnosis of sinonasal immunoglobulin G4-related disease. The patient responded well to oral prednisolone and methotrexate treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The main objective of the current report is to raise awareness among physicians about the significance of promptly identifying and diagnosing this rarity, thus preventing the adverse consequences linked to delayed diagnosis and treatment initiation.

[New manifestation of a type 2-inflammation in the upper respiratory tract with nasal polyposis under treatment with an asthma biologic]. / Neumanifestation einer Typ-2-Inflammation im Bereich der oberen Atemwege mit Polyposis nasi unter einem Asthmabiologikum.

INTRODUCTION: For 7 years we gained experience of how asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis respond to biologics. In contrast, it is much less known, how ASA/NSAID intolerance (Widal's disease) behaves under biologicals. We therefore describe the case of a patient with both clinical conditions who reacted with a severe intolerance reaction under perioperative metamizole administration.

Clinical Aspects of Chronic Idiopathic Postnasal Drip: An Entity Not to Be Overlooked.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Postnasal drip may be related to several diseases, but not all patients are clearly diagnosed. Patients with chronic, idiopathic postnasal drip symptoms are easily overlooked, and their clinical features are yet to be identified. This study aimed to analyze the clinical features and response to first generation antihistamine-decongestant therapy in patients with chronic idiopathic postnasal drip, suggesting it as a distinct entity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study involving 157 chronic idiopathic postnasal drip patients was conducted, analyzing demographics, symptoms, and treatment response to first-generation antihistamines and nasal decongestants. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 55.4±17.0 years old. Median duration of symptom was 36 months (range=12-66 months) and severity in the visual analogue scale was 7 (range=5-8). Throat discomfort was the most frequently associated symptom (73.7%). Cough was recorded in 30.3% of patients. Viscosity of postnasal drip was associated with rhinorrhea and throat discomfort. Of the patients, 71.6% responded positively to 1st generation antihistamine-decongestant medication. However, 25.9% of patients presented symptom re-occurrence. Patients with nasal stiffness or persistent symptoms presented a higher re-occurrence rate compared to others. CONCLUSION: This study outlines the clinical features of patients with chronic idiopathic postnasal drip and suggests it as a distinctive entity., This proposal aims to enhance diagnostic precision and promote further research in the field.

Type-2 severe asthma comorbidities in the era of biologics: time to rethink clinical response?

INTRODUCTION: The use of monoclonal antibodies in patients with severe asthma has led clinicians to explore new levels of clinical improvement, as testified by the growing interest on clinical remission achievement. In this context, a major role is played by asthma-related comorbidities, which can influence asthma pathophysiology and treatment response. AREAS COVERED: In this special report, we highlighted how asthma-related comorbidities could deeply affect monoclonal antibody response as well as clinical remission achievement. As examples, we provided data from clinical trials and real-life experiences involving patients with severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) or bronchiectasis. EXPERT OPINION: Comorbidities associated with severe asthma development should be carefully assessed in everyday clinical practice, even with the help of new diagnostic technologies, artificial intelligence and multidisciplinary teams. Future studies should address the role of comorbidities in remission achievement, describing how these diseases could generate new trajectories of clinical and functional response in patient treated with monoclonal antibodies.

Antibody-based therapeutics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a prevalent inflammatory condition with heterogenous underlying endotypes, the most common being type 2 mediated inflammation. Several biologics have been developed to target specific pro-inflammatory cytokines and their receptors with proven efficacy in both quantitative and qualitative outcomes in patients with severe uncontrolled disease. However, there is an ongoing debate on the role of biologics relative to conventional therapies for CRSwNP and their efficacy in patient subgroups with non-polyp type 2 disease. AREAS COVERED: This review examines the evidence on the efficacy and safety of biologics in CRSwNP, recommendations for their use, and discusses the broader economic factors influencing their application in clinical practice. EXPERT OPINION: Emerging real-life data demonstrating the variable efficacy of the available biologics for patients with CRSwNP, coupled with the high cost compared to conventional therapies such as surgery, renders biologics to be considered as an add-on therapy in the majority of cases. However, ongoing research into increasing biologic dose intervals and novel therapies targeting alternative pathways may offer a more cost-effective and sustainable option in future.

Case Report: Management of Acanthamoeba Rhinosinusitis in a Patient with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Infections caused by free-living amoebae pose a significant public health threat owing to growing populations of immunocompromised hosts combined with diagnostic delays, treatment difficulties, and high case fatality rates. Nasopharyngeal infections caused by Acanthamoeba are rare and the optimal treatment is not well established. We report a case of Acanthamoeba rhinosinusitis in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who presented with headaches and chronic rhinosinusitis refractory to multiple courses of antibiotics. A diagnosis of Acanthamoeba rhinosinusitis was established through broad-range polymerase chain reaction testing on sinus tissue. The patient had a favorable response to treatment, which included surgical debridement, cessation of immunosuppressants, and a three-drug regimen consisting of miltefosine, fluconazole, and sulfadiazine.

Study protocol: the biologics in severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps survey.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a frequent condition affecting approximately 2% of the population. Medical treatment consists long-term use of intranasal corticosteroids and short-term use of oral corticosteroids, in adjunct with saline solution rinses. Surgical management is proposed in patients who failed after medical treatment. In France, two biologics are reimbursed in case of severe uncontrolled CRSwNP despite medical treatment and endoscopic sinus surgery. Waiting for head-to-head biologics comparison, studies should report the efficacy and safety of biologics in large real-life cohorts. This study protocol describes the aims and methods of a prospective, observational, national, multicentric cohort of patients with CRSwNP treated with biologics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The BIOlogics in severe nasal POlyposis SurvEy is a French multicentre prospective observational cohort study. The main aim is to assess the efficacy and tolerance of biologics in patients with CRSwNP, with or without association with other type 2 diseases, and to determine the strategies in case of uncontrolled disease under biologics. Patients over 18 years old requiring biologics for CRSwNP in accordance with its marketing approval in France (ie, severe nasal polyposis, with lack of control under nasal corticosteroid, systemic corticosteroids and surgery) are invited to participate. Collected data include topical history of surgical procedures and biologics, medication and use of systemic corticosteroids, visual analogical scales for specific symptoms, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 questionnaire, nasal polyp score, asthma control test, Lund-Mackay score on CT scan and IgE concentration and eosinophilic count on blood sample. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05228041/DRI_2021/0030.

[Blood eosinophilia in patients with severe bronchial asthma and chronic polypous rhinosinusitis treated with dupilumab: A review].

Bronchial asthma and chronic polypous rhinosinusitis are diseases associated with a T2-inflammatory immune response. These nosologies can be combined, creating the preconditions for a more severe course of multimorbidity, requiring the use of genetic engineering biological therapy. Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody that can specifically bind to the alpha subunit of the interleukin-4 receptor and block the action of interleukins 4 and 13, which play a key role in the development of T2 inflammation. Numerous studies have demonstrated the high effectiveness of this medicament. The use of dupilumab in some cases may be accompanied by an increase in eosinophils in the blood. This article presents scientific base and our own experience in treating patients with dupilumab-associated eosinophilia, in addition we describe an algorithm for examining this group of patients for the purpose of timely diagnosis of diseases such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, eosinophilic pneumonia, etc. It should be noted that in the most cases eosinophilia during targeted therapy with dupilumab is temporary and does not cause clinical manifestations.

Effectiveness and safety profile of mepolizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Real life data in a tertiary care.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is characterized by a type 2 pattern of inflammation. Mepolizumab was approved for the treatment of CRSwNP in 2021, it may be useful to evaluate its safety profile in a real-world setting. AIM: This work aimed to prospectively highlight the effectiveness and safety profile of Mepolizumab in patients with CRSwNP enrolled in the Otorhinolaryngology Unit of the University Hospital of Messina. METHODS: An observational cohort study was carried out considering all patients treated with Mepolizumab. A descriptive analysis was conducted reporting all demographic characteristics, endoscopic evaluations, and symptom conditions. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were treated with Mepolizumab, one patient discontinued the treatment. A statistically significant reduction in the Sino-Nasal Outcome Tests-22 (SNOT-22) and nasal polyp score (NPS) was shown at the 6th and 12th months compared to baseline values (SNOT-22, -33 and - 43, p < 0.001 for both comparisons; NPS, 0 and - 1, p < 0.001 for both comparisons). The median (Q1-Q3) sniffin' sticks test score increased from 7 (6-8) at the 6th month to 11 (10-13) at the 12th month. Seven patients (24.1 %) reported pain at the injection site, accompanied by redness, warmth, and tenderness within the first 24 h post-injection with a median duration of three days from the onset. CONCLUSIONS: Given the optimal treatment response and the minimal adverse effects observed, clinicians should consider Mepolizumab a safe and effective treatment in CRSwNP patients. Further studies in real-life setting are necessary to better understand the long-term effects.

[Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis : A retrospective analysis of therapeutic approaches in 463 patients]. / Chronische Rhinosinusitis mit Polyposis nasi : Retrospektive Analyse des therapeutischen Vorgehens bei 463 Patienten.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease, the treatment of which has undergone significant changes in recent years. In addition to surgical approaches, topical and systemic steroids, and adaptive acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) desensitization, three specific antibodies have complemented the therapeutic portfolio since 2019. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of all patients who presented as outpatients for the first time due to CRSwNP in 2007 and 2008 (collective A) and 2017 and 2018 (collective B) was performed, up to and including June 2023. RESULTS: The clinical courses of 463 patients (mean age 49.1 years, range 5-82 years; 65.9% male) were included in the analysis. Conservative treatment with nasal corticosteroids started before initial presentation was more frequent in collective B (collective A 43.9% vs. collective B 72.2%). In 278 of the 463 patients (60%; A: 62%, B: 58%), at least one operation on the nasal sinuses had been performed after initial presentation; in 101 of these patients (36.3%) recurrent polyposis (within mean follow-up of 2.4 years) required further treatment. The indication for ASA provocation/desensitization was applied less frequently in collective B, also due to a high discontinuation rate (at least 38%) of the maintenance therapy. Of the total cohort, 16 patients (3.5%; A: n = 8, B: n = 8) were meanwhile switched to antibody therapy at recurrence. CONCLUSION: A step-by-step guideline-orientated approach is recommended in the treatment of CRSwNP. Systemic antibodies as an add-on to nasal corticosteroids are a relatively new therapeutic option for treatment-refractory CRSwNP, which reduces the indication for ASA desensitization, which is associated with a relatively high incidence of side effects and poor compliance.

Comparative real-world outcomes of dupilumab versus endoscopic sinus surgery in the treatment of severe CRSwNP patients.

INTRODUCTION: Management of severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has changed significantly in recent years, with different treatments now available including biologics and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), although there are still few comparative studies. We aimed to compare 1-year outcomes of patients with severe CRSwNP treated with dupilumab or ESS plus intranasal corticosteroids (INCS). METHODS: In this retrospective, real-life, observational, cohort study, we enrolled 101 patients with severe CRSwNP who were treated with INCS and either ESS (n = 49) or dupilumab (n = 52). The following outcomes were considered: nasal polyp score (NPS), Sino Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), visual analogue scale (VAS) for specific symptoms, Sniffin' Sticks identification test (SSIT), need for oral corticosteroids (OCS) and local eosinophilia detected by nasal cytology. RESULTS: ΔNPS was significantly higher in the surgery group up to 12 months when the difference with dupilumab group was no longer significant (ΔNPS: 4 vs. 4.1). ΔVAS rhinorrhoea, ΔVAS smell and ΔSNOT-22 were significantly higher in the dupilumab group at 12 months (p < .05). SSIT scores were significantly better in the dupilumab group starting from the first month of follow-up (p < .05). In the dupilumab group, only 6.1% of patients had detectable local eosinophilia compared to 57% in the surgery group alongside with a lower need for OCS (16.3% vs. 61%). CONCLUSIONS: Both dupilumab and ESS were effective in improving outcomes in patients with severe CRSwNP over 12 months. Nevertheless, patients treated with dupilumab had greater improvement in terms of SNOT-22, VAS rhinorrhoea, VAS smell and SSIT scores, with better control of local inflammation and less need for OCS.

Biologics versus endoscopic sinus surgery: Acute rhinosinusitis episodes and antibiotic use in chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine if chronic rhinosinusitis patients treated with endoscopic sinus surgery have fewer episodes of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) post treatment compared to CRS patients treated with biologics alone. METHODS: We analyzed the electronic medical records of 213 adults with CRS who initiated treatment with either dupilumab or mepolizumab in calendar years 2016-2021 (CRS-biologics) group and a matched group with tissue eosinophilia who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery (CRS-ESS) group. For each cohort, the medical record was reviewed to determine the number of ARS episodes for 12 months before and after treatment. Similarly, the number of antibiotic prescriptions was determined for each cohort in the 12 months after initiation of biologic therapy or ESS. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in ARS episodes before initiation of between the CRS-biologic and CRS-ESS cohorts (0.38 versus 0.44 episodes per year, respectively; p = 0.323). In contrast, after initiation of therapy, the CRS-biologics group had a significantly reduced frequency of acute rhinosinusitis episodes versus the CRS-ESS group (0.11 versus 0.25 episodes per year; p = 0.001). Finally, the utilization of oral antibiotics in the 12 months after among those treated with biologics versus those treated with ESS was not significantly different (0.04 versus 0.08, respectively; p = 0.109). CONCLUSION: For CRS patients, treatment with dupilumab or mepolizumab significantly reduced the number of ARS episodes compared to CRS treated with ESS. Biologics appear to work as well as ESS in the control of ARS episodes after treatment for CRS.

[Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps-extension of dupilumab treatment intervals]. / Chronische Rhinosinusitis mit nasalen Polypen ­ Verlängerung der Dupilumab-Therapieintervalle.

BACKGROUND: In patients with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks can completely resolve nasal polys, sinus disease, and symptoms. In this case, patients ask for de-escalation. Although trials have demonstrated recurrence after stopping the biologic at 24 weeks, reducing the dose of dupilumab to once every 4 weeks did not result in deterioration of control. An extension of the treatment intervals would, however, diverge from the approval text, and is currently not recommended. METHODS: The course of 29 patients with severe CRSwNP, type­2 inflammation-associated comorbidities, and an indication for biologic was retrospectively analyzed. After resolution of CRSwNP and symptoms under biweekly dupilumab 300 mg, the dupilumab interval had been prolonged individually, initially up to 4 weeks, thereafter up to 6 weeks, if applicable. Control was assessed via quality of life (22-item sinonasal outcome test, SNOT-22), nasal polyp score, and smell identification test (Sniffin' Sticks; Burghart Messtechnik, Holm, Germany). RESULTS: All patients showed an excellent improvement within the first 3 months. The dupilumab application interval was extended to 4 weeks after 7-31 months (median 13 months) and to 6 weeks (n = 9) after 17-35 months (median 23 months). No recurrent polyps or symptoms were subsequently observed. CONCLUSION: In case of maximal regression of polyps and discomfort, extension of dupilumab injection intervals to 4 and potentially 6 weeks is possible without clinical worsening. Further studies on de-escalation or termination of biologic treatment when CRSwNP control is achieved are essential.

[A comparative study of the effectiveness of azoximer bromide and surgery on the quality of the life of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps]. / Sravnitel'naya otsenka vliyaniya azoksimera bromida i khirurgicheskogo lecheniya na kachestvo zhizni patsientov s khronicheskim rinosinusitom bez polipov.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of azoximer bromide and surgery on the quality of life of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) without polyps. We also wanted to examine changes in the patient's emotional state and the nature of their complaints. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The results of using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) questionnaire in patients with CRS without severe or moderate-severe polyps, before treatment and 3 months after treatment, are presented. Patients, depending on their choice, were treated with functional endoscopic intervention or a course of 6 mg/ml azoximer bromide (1 ml per day, a course of at least 10 days). RESULTS: The median [interquartile range] score for VAS in patients before azoximer bromide treatment was 6.7 [6.3; 7.05] points, after treatment 4.2 [3.50; 4.70] points. The median [interquartile range] of VAS scores in patients before surgical treatment was 6.4 [6.1; 6.9] points, and after 4.8 [4.50; 5.30] points. The median [interquartile range] of the SNOT-22 score before azoximer bromide treatment was 33 [32; 36] points, after treatment - 24 [22; 25] points. The median [interquartile range] of the SNOT-22 score before surgery was 34 [32; 36] points, after treatment - 19 [18; 21.25] points. CONCLUSION: Azoximer bromide treatment and surgery improve the quality of life of patients with CRS (according to the visual analog scale and all SNOT-22 domains) during a control survey after 3 months (p<0.001). Surgical treatment has a stronger impact on the quality of life, which is more noticeable in the influence on the domains "Rhinological symptoms", "Extranasal symptoms", "Ear/facial symptoms" (p<0.05). According to the domains "Psychological dysfunction", "Sleep dysfunction", surgical intervention had no advantages in affecting the quality of life, compared with taking azoximer bromide (p<0.05).

[Problems of polypragmasia and drug interaction in the treatment of uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis]. / Problemy polipragmazii i lekarstvennogo vzaimodeistviya v terapii neoslozhnennogo ostrogo rinosinusita.

This publication discusses polypragmasia and drug interactions in the treatment of uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis in children and adults. Treatment of rhinosinusitis on an outpatient basis in multimorbid patients may be accompanied by multiple prescriptions, which increases the risk of drug interactions. The article reflects the most significant inappropriate combinations of both medicines and biologically active additives, herbal preparations. The advantages of using drugs with proven effectiveness, in particular intranasal glucocorticosteroids, are considered.