RESUMEN
Hospital length of stay (LOS) in the USA has been increasing since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, with numerous negative outcomes, including decreased quality of care, worsened patient satisfaction and negative financial impacts on hospitals. While many proposed factors contributing to prolonged LOS are challenging to modify, poor coordination of care and communication among clinical teams can be improved.Geographical cohorting of provider teams, patients and other clinical staff is proposed as a solution to prolonged LOS and readmissions. However, many studies on geographical cohorting alone have shown no significant impact on LOS or readmissions. Other potential benefits of geographical cohorting include improved quality of care, learning experience, communication, teamwork and efficiency.This paper presents a retrospective study at Duke University Hospital (DUH) on the General Medicine service, deploying a bundled intervention of geographical cohorting of patients and their care teams, twice daily multidisciplinary rounds and incremental case management support. The quality improvement study found that patients in the intervention arm had 16%-17% shorter LOS than those in the control arms, and there was a reduction in 30-day hospital readmissions compared with the concurrent control arm. Moreover, there was some evidence of improved accuracy of estimated discharge dates in the intervention arm.Based on these findings, the health system at DUH recognised the value of geographical cohorting and implemented additional geographically based medicine units with multidisciplinary rounds. Future studies will confirm the sustained impact of these care transformations on hospital throughput and patient outcomes, aiming to reduce LOS and enhance the quality of care provided to patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Manejo de Caso , Tiempo de Internación , Readmisión del Paciente , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Manejo de Caso/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo de Caso/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Masculino , Femenino , SARS-CoV-2 , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Puntaje de Propensión , Pandemias , Anciano , North Carolina , Rondas de Enseñanza/métodos , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Rondas de Enseñanza/normasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between bedside rounding (BSR) and other rounding strategies (ORS) with resident evaluations of teaching attendings and self-reported attending characteristics. METHODS: Faculty from three academic medical centers who attended resident teaching services for ≥4 weeks during the 2018-2019 academic year were invited to complete a survey about personal and rounding characteristics. The survey instrument was iteratively developed to assess rounding strategy as well as factors that could affect choosing one rounding strategy over another. Survey results and teaching evaluation scores were linked, then deidentified and analyzed in aggregate. Included evaluation items assessed resident perceptions of autonomy, time management, professionalism, and teaching effectiveness, as well as a composite score (the numeric average of each attending's scores for all of the items at his or her institution). BSR was defined as spending >50% of rounding time in patients' rooms with the team. Hallway rounding and conference room rounding were combined into the ORS category and defined as >50% of rounding time in these settings. All of the scores were normalized to a 10-point scale to allow aggregation across sites. RESULTS: A total of 105 attendings were invited to participate, and 65 (62%) completed the survey. None of the resident evaluation scores significantly differed based on rounding strategy. Composite scores were similar for BSR and ORS (difference of <0.1 on a 10-point scale). Spearman correlation coefficients identified no statistically significant correlation between rounding strategy and evaluation scores. An exploratory analysis of variance model identified no single factor that was significantly associated with composite teaching scores (P > 0.45 for all) or the domains of teaching efficacy, professionalism, or autonomy (P > 0.13 for all). Having a formal educational role was significantly associated with better evaluation scores for time management, and the number of lectures delivered per year approached statistical significance for the same domain. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting BSR did not significantly affect resident evaluations of teaching attendings. Resident perception of teaching effectiveness based on rounding strategy should be neither a motivator nor a barrier to widespread institution of BSR.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/educación , Rondas de Enseñanza/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Humanos , Medicina Interna/educación , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/psicología , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Rondas de Enseñanza/métodos , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricosAsunto(s)
Curriculum , Internado y Residencia , Neurología/educación , Rondas de Enseñanza , Curriculum/normas , Curriculum/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Neurología/normas , Neurología/estadística & datos numéricos , Rondas de Enseñanza/normas , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the proportion of headache-related grand rounds in academic neurology programs and to compare this with adult neurology residency director views on the need for an increase in headache-related grand rounds. BACKGROUND: Although headache are among the most prevalent and most burdensome neurologic conditions, headache medicine is often considered underrepresented in neurology departments. Additionally, prior studies have shown that many neurology residency directors feel that training programs do not include an adequate amount of exposure to headache clinics or headache-related didactics. One important aspect of didactic education in neurology departments is adult neurology grand rounds. Previous publications have evaluated neither the proportion of headache-related grand rounds in academic neurology departments nor the residency program directors' views on appropriate amount of headache-related grand rounds. Our study has attempted to quantify this information to elucidate opportunities to improve practice educational gaps. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed adult neurology residency directors (from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education [ACGME] listing of academic adult neurology residency programs) between October 2018 and September 2019. In addition, we used two methods to obtain the proportion of headache-related grand rounds in neurology: (1) emailing residency directors a questionnaire asking for a list of prior grand rounds topics and (2) an online search for each academic neurology program. RESULTS: First, for our grand rounds analysis, headache medicine consisted of 3.7% of the lectures in 2017-2018 and 6.3% of the lectures in 2018-2019 (average of each institution; 17 institutions and 411 total lectures in 2017-2018, 21 institutions and 463 total lectures in 2018-2019). The most common number of lectures on headache medicine for each grand rounds series was zero (for 7 of 17 grand rounds series in 2017-2018 and 7 of 21 in 2018-2019), followed closely by one lecture (for 6 of 17 grand rounds series in 2017-2018 and 6 of 21 in 2018-2019). Second, for our survey, the response rate was 19.3% (29/150). No residency director thought their institution had too many grand rounds dedicated to headache medicine, and 62.1% (18/29) thought they had an adequate amount of headache grand rounds. Within the survey responders, 75.9% (22/29) of adult neurology residency programs have a board-certified headache specialist at their institution. CONCLUSIONS: Although most adult neurology residency directors believe that headache is adequately represented in adult neurology grand rounds, headache medicine makes up 4%-6% of all neurology grand rounds. Compared with other neurology subspecialties and the other core ACGME milestones, headache makes up the fewest grand rounds lectures that were assessed in this study.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Trastornos de Cefalalgia , Cefalea , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Neurología/educación , Neurología/estadística & datos numéricos , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this national survey was to assess the overall impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the provision of interventional radiology (IR) services in Canada. METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed via national and regional radiology societies, exploring (1) center information and staffing, (2) acute and on-call IR services, (3) elective IR services, (4) IR clinics, (5) multidisciplinary rounds, (6) IR training, (7) personal protection equipment (PPE), and departmental logistics. RESULTS: Individual responses were received from 142 interventional radiologists across Canada (estimated 70% response rate). Nearly half of the participants (49.3%) reported an overall decrease in demand for acute IR services; on-call services were maintained at centers that routinely provide these services (99%). The majority of respondents (73.2%) were performing inpatient IR procedures at the bedside where possible. Most participants (88%) reported an overall decrease in elective IR services. Interventional radiology clinics and multidisciplinary rounds were predominately transitioned to virtual platforms. The vast majority of participants (93.7%) reported their center had disseminated an IR specific PPE policy; 73% reported a decrease in case volume for trainees by at least 25% and a proportion of trainees will either have a delay in starting their careers as IR attendings (24%) or fellowship training (35%). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on IR services in Canada, particularly for elective cases. Many centers have utilized virtual platforms to provide multidisciplinary meetings, IR clinics, and training. Guidelines should be followed to ensure patient and staff safety while resuming IR services.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Comunitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiología Intervencionista/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Atención Posterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Canadá , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Becas/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Comunitarios/organización & administración , Humanos , Política Organizacional , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Equipo de Protección Personal , Radiología Intervencionista/educación , Radiología Intervencionista/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic has presented unique challenges to medical education. With the lack of in-person away rotations for the 2020-2021 residency application cycle, virtual rotations have surfaced as an alternative. The virtual rotations that the authors participated in allowed for active participation in various resident educational activities such as journal club, grand rounds, and morning conferences. One critical aspect of virtual rotations was the one-on-one meetings with the program leadership. In addition to a virtual tour of the hospital and campus, many programs offered virtual social hours with the residents to converse about the program, the city, and the match process. A few programs even allowed applicants to attend virtually live-streamed surgeries. These rotations offer students, especially those without a corresponding home program, an invaluable opportunity to express their interest in a particular program and gain foundational knowledge about the specialty. Virtual rotations also provide underrepresented minorities and international medical graduates with clinical exposure, mentorship, and networking opportunities, mitigating some of the challenges presented by COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Diversidad Cultural , Educación a Distancia/organización & administración , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Pandemias/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Educación a Distancia/métodos , Educación a Distancia/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Mentores , Selección de Personal/organización & administración , Selección de Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Distanciamiento Físico , Rondas de Enseñanza/métodos , Rondas de Enseñanza/organización & administración , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multiple modalities are available to introduce patient safety training to healthcare professionals. In internal medicine, clinical rounds have always played an important role in education; however, the patient safety content taught at the point of care is not well studied. We studied, both quantitatively and qualitatively, the number and nature of patient safety messages delivered by attending physicians to determine what is taught at the point of care and how well this is recognised and recalled by attending physicians, residents and medical students. METHODS: This prospective mixed methods study was conducted on the medicine teaching service. Clinical rounds were audio-recorded. Immediately after rounds, attending physicians, residents and students completed a short survey card identifying the number and type of educational messages they immediately recalled teaching or hearing. Independent t-test was used to compare differences in the number of messages delivered by attendings and recalled by trainees. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare differences in messages delivered by attending physicians compared with trainees. Recordings were transcribed and analysed qualitatively for patient safety content. RESULTS: Trainees recalled more educational messages than attendings recalled teaching in all educational domains. Safety messages comprised 17.5% of educational messages. The average number of patient safety messages recalled per session was 1.08 per attending physicians, 1.84 per resident and 2.50 per student. Residents recalled 56.4% of safety messages delivered; students recalled 76.7% of safety messages. CONCLUSION: Patient safety is a focus of teaching during clinical rounds and provides meaningful opportunities to train students and residents to practice safe patient care.
Asunto(s)
Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Rondas de Enseñanza/métodos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica/normas , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Investigación Cualitativa , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Rondas de Enseñanza/normas , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Hourly rounding by nursing staff helps to proactively manage patient needs and minimize the number of unscheduled calls from patients. The focus of this study was to determine if an increased emphasis on hourly rounding had an effect on call bell usage on an oncology unit. Patient call bell usage requests, such as asking for water or repositioning, and the total number of all alarms, such as bed exit alarms and lavatory assist alarms, decreased. Subsequent patient satisfaction surveys showed an increase in patient perception of how quickly help was received.
Asunto(s)
Alarmas Clínicas/normas , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/normas , Enfermería Oncológica/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Rondas de Enseñanza/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alarmas Clínicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermería Oncológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Background: Grand rounds and named lectureships are forums in academic medicine for sharing research, scholarly achievements, and clinical expertise. An invitation to speak at grand rounds is regarded as an honor and is part of the pathway to academic promotion. We describe gender representation relative to the national academic medical workforce among invited speakers at departmental grand rounds and annual named lectures at a large academic medical center. Materials and Methods: Lists of external speakers for grand rounds from 2015 through 2017 were obtained from 18 departments and for annual named lectures from 2007 to 2017 from 7 departments. Results: Of the 783 invited speakers to the 25 speaker series, there were 178 women (22.7%). The proportion of women speakers for departmental grand rounds ranged from 0% to 59.3%; representation of women speakers was lower than representation in their specialty in 14 of the 18 departments and significantly lower in 4 of the 18 departments. In four departments, there was a higher proportion of women than available in the specialty-specific academic medicine workforce. The proportion of women who spoke at annual named lectures was significantly lower in two of seven lecture series and ranged from 0% to 21.2%. Three departments had no women speakers. Conclusions: The underrepresentation of women as speakers is a potential target to improve gender representation and role modeling and provide equitable opportunity for academic advancement. Solutions may include formal diversity and inclusion training, intentional overrepresentation of invited female speakers, and inclusion of women on grand rounds planning committees.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Prejuicio , Sexismo , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Femenino , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This paper examines pre-registration nursing students' perceptions of the practice of intentional rounding and perceived benefits for nurses and patients. Intentional rounding was developed to ensure nursing staff regularly check on patients to ensure that all care needs are met. It has been linked to a reduction in falls and call bell use, and an increase in patient safety. No previous studies have examined pre-registration nursing students' role in the practice of intentional rounding during clinical placements nor the perceptions of rounding practices, important from a future workforce perspective. A cross-sectional multisite study was undertaken, and pre-registration nursing students completed the Nurses' Perceptions of Patient Rounding Scale between August 2017- June 2018, distributed using online education platforms and email. Strobe reporting guidelines were used to report findings. Participants perceived positive benefits in intentional rounding for nurses and patients. Mixed opinions surrounded the sufficiency of education received around the intervention. Previous nursing experience was linked to opposing opinions of intentional rounding, depending on education levels. Participants had a positive perception of intentional rounding practices overall. Education surrounding intentional rounding needs to be consistent, and introduced before students are expected to actively participate in the practice of rounding on clinical placement.
Asunto(s)
Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Rondas de Enseñanza/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Bachillerato en Enfermería/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Percepción , Estudiantes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Rondas de Enseñanza/métodos , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe international variation in interprofessional rounds in intensive care units (ICUs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survey of ICU clinicians on their practices and perceptions of rounds using societal mailing lists and social media. RESULTS: Out of 2402 respondents, 1752 (72.8%) use rounds. Teams are mostly composed of intensivists, nurses and medical trainees. The majority of rounds (57.5%) last >2â¯h, and North Americans report the highest rates of rounds allowing family attendance (92.4%). Shorter rounds (1-2â¯h, OR 0.67, 0.52-0.86, pâ¯<â¯0.01; <1â¯h, OR 0.72, 0.53-0.97, pâ¯=â¯0.03), and strategies such as designating a person for writing (OR 0.73, 0.57-0.95, pâ¯=â¯0.01), and designating a person to assist other patients (OR 0.75, 0.57-0.98, pâ¯=â¯0.04) are associated with a lower perception of negative outcomes. Using daily goals during rounds is associated with a higher perception of positive outcomes (OR 1.85, 1.17-2.90, pâ¯<â¯0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Three-quarters of respondents perform rounds, and models of rounds are heterogeneous, creating challenges for future studies on improving rounds. Respondents reporting better outcomes also experience shorter rounds, and adopt strategies such as discussion of daily goals, and designation individuals for writing or assisting other patients during rounds.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Rondas de Enseñanza/normas , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Internacionalidad , Internet , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The development and implementation of a team-based pharmacy practice model is described. METHODS: In January 2016 a transition from a staff-specialist to a team-based pharmacy practice model was implemented. The overall goal of the model change was to enhance the pharmacist's clinical roles and further integrate pharmacists into the healthcare team. Before implementation of the new staffing model, a formalized metric evaluation process was created. The aim of this metric evaluation was to gauge model success, determine areas of model revision, and objectively communicate pharmacist impact. Objective metrics were evaluated before implementation and 1 year after implementation. In addition, surveys were distributed to pharmacists, physicians, nursing and hospital administration before and after model implementation. RESULTS: At 1-year postimplementation, the pharmacist:patient bed ratio decreased from 1:87 to 1:47, the number of rounds/huddles with pharmacist attendance increased by 63% to 80 per week, and the number of clinical interventions and new clinical consultations increased from 57 to 62 and from 12 to 16 per day, respectively. Nonformulary medication use also decreased from 1.77 to 0.623 per 1000 patient days, and compliance with therapeutic initiatives increased from 77%to 91%. Overall, 72% of pharmacist survey responses indicated satisfaction with the model change. CONCLUSION: A team-based pharmacy practice model was designed and successfully implemented over a 3-year period. Data analysis revealed improvements in clinical and operational endpoints and enhanced pharmacist, physician, and nursing satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Organizacionales , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/organización & administración , Rol Profesional , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Farmacéuticos/psicología , Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/psicología , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ward round is a key element in everyday hospital inpatient care irrespective of the medical speciality. The underperformance in conducting ward rounds of junior clinicians has already been described. Therefore, necessary skills and competences of clinicians need to be defined, taught and delivered for curricular instruction. In addition to published data on ward round competences in internal medicine this study aims to determine the common competences for surgical and psychiatric ward rounds in order to find differences depending on the speciality. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with surgical (N = 30) and psychiatric ward staff (N = 30) of a university hospital and five community hospitals were conducted. Competences necessary for performing ward rounds as well as structural aspects were identified by systematic content analysis and frequency analysis, supported by adequate statistics. RESULTS: Relevant competences for both fields are: collaborative clinical reasoning, communication with the patient and the team, organization, teamwork, management of difficult situations, self-management, error-management, teaching, empathy, nonverbal communication, patient-management and professionalism. Clinical skills were mentioned more often in surgical interviews, while nonverbal communication was described more often in psychiatric interviews. Empathy and communication with the team were more frequently attributed to psychiatric residents. CONCLUSION: The competences which were identified as necessary for conducting a ward round in surgery and psychiatry are similar and correspond to previously reported competences in internal medicine. Clinical skills are of greater importance in surgery than in psychiatry. Concerning empathy and nonverbal communication, further research is needed to determine whether they are of minor importance in surgery or whether there is a lack of awareness of these competences.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica/normas , Cirugía General , Medicina Interna/educación , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/normas , Psiquiatría , Rondas de Enseñanza , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Comunicación , Empatía , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Humanos , Estudios Interdisciplinarios , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Entrevistas como Asunto , Relaciones Médico-Enfermero , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Rondas de Enseñanza/normas , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Residents collect information from the electronic health record (EHR) to present during rounds, but this crucial process is understudied. The purpose of this paper is to examine the feasibility of utilizing an EHR embedded time-tracking software to quantify resident pre-round EHR activity and how patient acuity impacts this activity. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This was a retrospective observational study that quantified resident EHR activities (total time spent, tasks performed and patient encounters accessed) during pre-rounds on their pediatric intensive care unit rotation between May 2016 and December 2016. Patient encounters were reviewed to determine resident ownership and critical care resources provided. FINDINGS: Allo 21 eligible participants were included. In total, 907 patient encounters were included to evaluate patient acuity impact. EHR usage per patient encounter (median in minutes (25th, 75th percentile)) was significantly affected by the critical care resources utilized. Total EHR time: both ventilator and vasoactive support (10.54 (6.68, 17.19)); neither ventilator nor vasoactive support (8.23 (5.07, 12.72)); invasive/noninvasive ventilator support (8.74 (5.69, 13.2)); and vasoactive support (10.37 (7.72, 11.65)), p<0.001. Chart review, order entry and documentation EHR times demonstrated similar trends. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Residents spend more time utilizing the EHR to collect data on patients who require significant critical care resources. This information can be useful to determine optimal resident to patient workload. Future research is required to assess this EHR tool's ability to contribute to physician workflow study. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: EHR embedded time-tracking software can offer insights into resident workflow.
Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Comunicación , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Documentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Flujo de TrabajoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trauma patient rounds are complex, with a high volume of complicated patients in a dynamic environment with competing priorities and workflows. This presents challenges to quality improvement as single-method research approaches fail to comprehensively understand these complex systems. We used a mixed-methods approach to understand factors contributing to system inefficiency and user dissatisfaction on daily patient rounds at a safety-net teaching hospital and level 1 trauma center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A human-centered design uses ethnographic observations and in-depth interviews to understand the challenges and needs facing users of a system. We performed in-context observations and 22 in-depth interviews with a cross-section of care team members, patients, and families. Using the lean methodology, we performed time observations of 15 rounds, tracking activities related to flow, and classified them as 'value added' and 'non-value added.' RESULTS: Lean time observations revealed that 34.2% of time was spent on 'non-value-added' activities. Qualitative interviews revealed that all users reported perceived inefficiency as their greatest challenge on rounds. Among these users, there were three distinct user groups: connectors, learners, and doers, and each group had a different set of needs and priorities for rounds which were not being met. CONCLUSIONS: To adequately address complex environments, we need to understand the strains on both the system and its users so that we can create sustainable quality-improvement programs. By mixing methods using lean and human-centered design processes, we were able to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the system- and human-centered factors affecting rounds on a trauma surgical service.
Asunto(s)
Eficiencia , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos , HumanosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Since 2015, the European Laryngological Society (ELS) has organized on a yearly basis the European Laryngological Live Surgery Broadcast. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the increasing worldwide audience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The number of individual computers logged in, number of estimated audience, and number of countries with an active audience were calculated and compared to the numbers in 2015. RESULTS: In 2018, 19 live interventions were performed in three parallel sessions. The surgeons worked in 10 departments in 8 different countries. The number of individual computers logged in increased from 1000 in 2015 to 16000 in 2018. The estimated audience increased from 3000 to 32000 visitors. The number of countries with an active audience increased from 52 to 91. DISCUSSION: The amount of computers logged in is increasing year by year. The audience was presenting despite inconvenient broadcasting times, highlighting the educational importance. The teaching aspect remains visible on videos of this year's and previous year's interventions. They can be seen on website http://els.livesurgery.net/home.php . The organization of the European Laryngological Live Surgery Broadcast concurs to the idea that live broadcast of laryngologic surgery is feasible and attractive. Therefore, the ELS is going to continue to organize additional European Laryngological Live Surgery Broadcasts in the future.
Asunto(s)
Internacionalidad , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Otolaringología/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Otolaringología/educación , Rondas de Enseñanza/métodos , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Grabación en VideoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Incomplete patient data, either due to difficulty gathering and synthesizing or inappropriate data filtering, can lead clinicians to misdiagnosis and medical error. How completely ICU interprofessional rounding teams appraise the patient data set that informs clinical decision-making is unknown. This study measures how frequently physician trainees omit data from prerounding notes ("artifacts") and verbal presentations during daily rounds. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical ICU with an established electronic health record and where physician trainees are the primary presenters during daily rounds. SUBJECTS: Presenters (medical student or resident physician), interprofessional rounding team. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We quantified the amount and types of patient data omitted from photocopies of physician trainees' artifacts and audio recordings of oral ICU rounds presentations when compared with source electronic health record data. An audit of 157 patient presentations including 6,055 data elements across nine domains revealed 100% of presentations contained omissions. Overall, 22.9% of data were missing from artifacts and 42.4% from presentations. The interprofessional team supplemented only 4.1% of additional available data. Frequency of trainee data omission varied by data type and sociotechnical factors. The strongest predictor of trainee verbal omissions was a preceding failure to include the data on the artifact. Passive data gathering via electronic health record macros resulted in extremely complete artifacts but paradoxically predicted greater likelihood of verbal omission when compared with manual notation. Interns verbally omitted the most data, whereas medical students omitted the least. CONCLUSIONS: In an academic rounding model reliant on trainees to preview and select data for presentation during ICU rounds, verbal appraisal of patient data was highly incomplete. Additional trainee oversight and education, improved electronic health record tools, and novel academic rounding paradigms are needed to address this potential source of medical error.
Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Auditoría Médica , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare patient satisfaction levels, staff perspectives and the time required using Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds (SIBR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA) versus traditional medical ward rounds (TR) in the ED. METHODS: We conducted an observational cross-sectional study. Ward rounds were categorised into a modified SIBR and TR at a tertiary ED in Australia according to predefined criteria. We compared the duration of ward rounds, invited patients and staff to complete anonymous questionnaires to compare patient satisfaction and staff perspectives. RESULTS: During the study period, SIBR group took significantly longer time than TR per patient (122 vs 88 s, P < 0.001). Patient questionnaires were completed for 320 encounters (101 SIBR, 219 TR). Patient satisfaction scores across all measured domains were significantly higher in SIBR than in the TR group. Patients often pointed out a lack of communication with medical staff during TR. Based on 131 completed staff questionnaires, nurses reported SIBR to be more useful than TR (nurses 78% vs doctors 44%, P = 0.001). The SIBR group had increased instances of staff introductions to patients (91% vs 66%, P < 0.001) and patients' involvement in discussion of management plans (98% vs 53%, P < 0.01). SIBR only weakly correlated with the overall positive experience in the ED (r = 0.19, P = 0.001). Organisational implementation issues raised through qualitative methods are reported in the paper. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the benefits that could be gained through SIBR technique over the TR method. Better workforce and resource planning is needed to support the sustainable implementation of SIBR in ED.
Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Rondas de Enseñanza/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes/psicología , Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Rondas de Enseñanza/métodos , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/normas , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Background and Purpose- Well-organized stroke care is associated with better patient outcomes, but the most important organizational factors are unknown. Methods- Data were extracted from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme of adults with acute stroke treated in stroke hospitals in England and Wales between April 2013 and March 2015. Multilevel models with random intercepts for hospitals were used to estimate the association of each variable with 30-day mortality to estimate the impact of admission to differently organized hospitals. Results- Of the 143 578 patients with acute stroke admitted to 154 hospitals, 14.4% died within 30 days of admission. In adjusted analyses, admission to hospitals with higher ratios of nurses trained in swallow screening was associated with reduced odds of death ( P=0.004), and admission to hospitals with daily physician ward rounds was associated with 10% lower odds of mortality compared with less-frequent ward rounds (95% CI, 0.82-0.98; P=0.013). Number of stroke admissions and overall ratio of registered nurses on duty at weekends were not found to be independently associated with mortality after adjustment for other factors. Conclusions- If these associations are causal, an extra 1332 deaths annually in England and Wales could be saved by hospitals providing care associated with a ratio of nurses trained in swallow screening of at least 3 per 10 beds and daily stroke physician ward rounds.