Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 426
Filtrar
1.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3947, 2024 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729951

RESUMEN

Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are a major cause of neonatal sepsis in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although the World Health Organization (WHO) reports that over 80% of these sepsis deaths could be prevented through improved treatment, the efficacy of the currently recommended first- and second-line treatment regimens for this condition is increasingly affected by high rates of drug resistance. Here we assess three well known antibiotics, fosfomycin, flomoxef and amikacin, in combination as potential antibiotic treatment regimens by investigating the drug resistance and genetic profiles of commonly isolated GNB causing neonatal sepsis in LMICs. The five most prevalent bacterial isolates in the NeoOBS study (NCT03721302) are Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, E. coli, Serratia marcescens and Enterobacter cloacae complex. Among these isolates, high levels of ESBL and carbapenemase encoding genes are detected along with resistance to ampicillin, gentamicin and cefotaxime, the current WHO recommended empiric regimens. The three new combinations show excellent in vitro activity against ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates. Our data should further inform and support the clinical evaluation of these three antibiotic combinations for the treatment of neonatal sepsis in areas with high rates of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.


Asunto(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii , Antibacterianos , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Sepsis Neonatal , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Sepsis Neonatal/microbiología , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Recién Nacido , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/genética , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Acinetobacter baumannii/aislamiento & purificación , Acinetobacter baumannii/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Amicacina/farmacología , Amicacina/uso terapéutico , Fosfomicina/farmacología , Fosfomicina/uso terapéutico , beta-Lactamasas/genética , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/genética , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Países en Desarrollo , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/genética , Quimioterapia Combinada , Serratia marcescens/efectos de los fármacos , Serratia marcescens/genética , Serratia marcescens/aislamiento & purificación , Enterobacter cloacae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacter cloacae/genética , Enterobacter cloacae/aislamiento & purificación , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo
2.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 245, 2024 Apr 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580931

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic use for early-onset sepsis represents a high percentage of antibiotic consumption in the neonatal setting. Measures to assess infants at risk of early-onset sepsis are needed to optimize antibiotic use. Our primary objective was to assess the impact of a departmental guideline on antibiotic use among term infants with suspected EOS not confirmed, in our neonatal unit. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study, to compare antibiotic use in term infants during a baseline period of January to December 2018, and a postintervention period from October 2019, to September 2020, respectively. The primary outcome was antibiotic use measured by days of therapy, the antibiotic spectrum index, the antibiotic use rate, and the length of therapy. RESULTS: We included 71 infants in the baseline period and 66 infants in the postintervention period. Compared to those in the baseline period, there was a significant reduction in overall antibiotic measures in the postintervention period, (P < 0.001). The total days of therapy/1000 patient-days decreased from 63/1000 patient-days during the baseline period to 25.8/1000 patient-days in the postintervention period, representing a relative reduction of 59%. The antibiotic use rate decreased by more than half of the infants, from 3.2% during the baseline period to 1.3% in the postintervention period. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a departmental guideline to assess infants at risk of early-onset sepsis based on their clinical condition and prompt discontinuation of antibiotics, is a simple and low-cost measure that contributed to an important decrease in antibiotic use.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
J Med Case Rep ; 18(1): 180, 2024 Mar 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523318

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a gram-negative bacteria known for causing opportunistic and nosocomial infections in humans. S. maltophilia is an emerging pathogen of concern due to it's increasing prevalence, diverse disease spectrum, intrinsic multi-drug resistance and high mortality rates in immunocompromised individuals. S. maltophilia is a rare cause of neonatal sepsis associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The bacterium's multi-drug resistance poses a considerable challenge for treatment, with various mechanisms contributing to its resistance. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case involving a 40-h-old male African neonate who exhibited symptoms of neonatal sepsis. The blood culture revealed Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, which was sensitive to ciprofloxacin and gentamicin but resistant to other antibiotics. Lumbar puncture for CSF could not be done because the father declined. We treated the newborn with the empirical first-line antibiotics as per the national guideline intravenous ampicillin and gentamicin for six days, and the child recovered fully with a repeated negative blood culture. CONCLUSIONS: This report describes a neonatal sepsis case caused by S. maltophilia, a multi-drug resistant bacteria and a rare cause of neonatal sepsis. We report that early detection of the bacterial and antimicrobial management based on local antibiogram data may be essential for successful patient's management.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Sepsis Neonatal , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , Niño , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Humanos , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico
4.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 37(1): 2327828, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38471804

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Newborns are particularly susceptible to infection in hospitals, with neonatal sepsis being the most common infection symptom and the third leading cause of neonatal death. Klebsiella pneumoniae is a gram-negative bacterium of Enterobacteriaceae, which is a common pathogen of neonatal septicemia. In this study, we will analyze and evaluate the current status, clinical characteristics, and drug resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniaesepsis infection in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), with the aim of providing effective basis for timely and accurate clinical diagnosis and treatment in clinical practice. METHODS: Statistical analysis was performed on 75 cases of Enterobacteriaceae septicemia in infants admitted to NICU in a special obstetrics and gynecology hospital in Shanghai from January 2020 to June 2022. Based on bacterial identification, isolates were divided into the Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) group (n = 49) and the non-KP Enterobacteriaceae group (n = 26). The infection, clinical characteristics, and bacterial resistance of the two groups of infected patients were compared. RESULTS: Comparing the clinical characteristics of the two groups, the results showed that most of the subjects in the KP and non-KP groups were premature infants, accounting for 100% and 92.3% of subjects, respectively; late onset was the main disease in both groups, accounting for 93.9% and 80.8% of subjects, respectively. All patients received Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter(PICC). The levels of pro calcitonin and CRP (C-reactive protein) were significantly higher in the KP group compared with those in the non-KP group (p < .05). At the same time, the incidence of thrombocytopenia in the KP group was significantly higher than that in the non-KP group (p < .05). The proportion of antimicrobial drug exposure in the KP group is higher than that in the non-KP group. The drug resistance of the KP group to ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, ampicillin/sulbactam, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin and compound sulfamethoxazole was significantly higher than that of the non-KP group, whereas the drug resistance rate to cefotetan, gentamycin and to bramycin was significantly lower than that of the non-KP group, Statistically significant differences (p < .05). 38 cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing ESBLs were tested for related resistance genes. The results showed that the main resistance types were SHV and TEM, with detection rates of 60.6% and 28.9%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that neonatal sepsis caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae infection has a high incidence and drug resistance in premature and low birth weight infants, and has become a serious public health problem; Clinicians should pay attention to differential diagnosis, Reasonable selection of antibiotics to reduce the generation of drug-resistant bacteria.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Klebsiella , Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Lactante , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , China , Sepsis/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , beta-Lactamasas/genética
5.
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi ; 26(2): 107-117, 2024 Feb 15.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38436306

RESUMEN

Meropenem is one of the most widely used special-grade antimicrobial agents in the treatment of neonatal sepsis. However, its irrational use has led to an increasingly severe problem of bacterial multidrug resistance. The guideline was developed following standardized methods and procedures, and provides 12 recommendations specifically addressing 9 clinical issues. The recommendations cover various aspects of meropenem use in neonates, including timing of administration, recommended dosage, extended infusion, monitoring and assessment, antimicrobial adjustment strategies, treatment duration, and treatment strategies for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. The aim of the guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations and guidance for the rational use of meropenem in neonates with sepsis.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Meropenem/uso terapéutico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 153, 2024 Feb 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38424519

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bacterial organisms causing neonatal sepsis have developed increased resistance to commonly used antibiotics. Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health problem. The spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for developing MDRO neonatal sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), dr. Ramelan Navy Central Hospital, in 2020-2022. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed on 113 eligible neonates. Patients whose blood cultures were positive for bacterial growth and diagnosed with sepsis were selected as the study sample. Univariate and multivariate analysis with multiple logistic regression were performed to find the associated risk factors for developing multidrug-resistant organism neonatal sepsis. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Multidrug-resistant organisms were the predominant aetiology of neonatal sepsis (91/113, 80.5%). The significant risk factors for developing MDRO neonatal sepsis were lower birth weight (OR: 1.607, 95% CI: 1.003 - 2.576, p-value: 0.049), history of premature rupture of the membrane (ProM) ≥ 18 (OR: 3.333, 95% CI: 2.047 - 5.428, p-value < 0.001), meconium-stained amniotic fluid (OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.512 - 3.717, p-value < 0.001), longer hospital stays (OR: 5.067, 95% CI: 2.912 - 8.815, p-value < 0.001), lower Apgar scores (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.442 - 3.512, p-value < 0.001), and the use of respiratory support devices, such as invasive ventilation (OR: 2.687, 95% CI: 1.514 - 4.771, p-value < 0.001), and non-invasive ventilation (OR: 2, 95% CI: 1.097 - 3.645, p-value: 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Our study determined various risk factors for multidrug-resistance organism neonatal sepsis and underscored the need to improve infection control practices to reduce the existing burden of drug-resistant sepsis. Low-birth-weight, a maternal history of premature rupture of the membrane lasting more than 18 hours, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, longer hospital stays, a low Apgar score, and the use of ventilators were the risk factors for developing drug-resistant neonatal sepsis.


Asunto(s)
Rotura Prematura de Membranas Fetales , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido , Sepsis Neonatal , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Sepsis , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis Neonatal/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Estudios Transversales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Sepsis/complicaciones , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Rotura Prematura de Membranas Fetales/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Acta Paediatr ; 113(5): 939-946, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38314886

RESUMEN

AIM: The diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) remains difficult. The main aim was to study the effect of a new algorithm for EOS, which includes the level of procalcitonin in umbilical cord blood, on the exposure to antibiotic therapy of premature newborn infants. METHODS: This was a monocentric, observational and retrospective study with before-and-after design. The duration and dose of antibiotic therapy provided as well as the morbidity and mortality were compared in two groups, one included 01 May 2015-30 November 2015 when procalcitonin was not used, and one after the change 01 November 2016-30 May 2017 when procalcitonin was used in a hospital setting in Nice, France. RESULTS: Sixty newborn infants were included in the before group and 54 in the after group. Antibiotic therapy was stopped after 24 h for 18 newborn infants in the after group and four in the before group, and after 48 h for 26 newborn infants in the after group and 10 in the before group. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a new decision-making algorithm including early procalcitonin assay of premature newborn infants significantly reduced exposure to antibiotics without modifying mortality or morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Recién Nacido , Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Humanos , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico
8.
J Trop Pediatr ; 70(2)2024 02 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38332590

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a short course of antibiotics (2-4 days), to a standard course (5-7 days), for the treatment of culture-negative neonatal sepsis. METHODS: Relevant databases were searched for RCTs comparing short- vs. standard-course of antibiotics for culture-negative sepsis. The primary outcomes were mortality and treatment failure, defined as the reappearance of clinical signs suggestive of sepsis within 7 days of stoppage of antibiotics. Secondary outcomes included neurological impairment, duration of hospital stay, need for oxygen, respiratory support and double-volume exchange transfusion (DVET). RESULTS: Seven RCTs were included in the review with 729 neonates >30 weeks gestational age at birth. No mortality occurred in either of the groups (2 studies; 276 neonates). Treatment failure rates were similar in the short- and standard-course antibiotic groups [7 studies; 729 neonates; risk ratio (RR) = 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55 to 1.86; very low certainty]. The short course of antibiotics resulted in a shorter hospital stay [3 studies; 293 neonates; mean difference (MD), -2.46 days; 95% CI, -3.16 to -1.75]. There was no difference in the need for oxygen supplementation (2 studies; 258 neonates; RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.40 to 4.91), any respiratory support (2 studies; 258 neonates; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.17) or DVET (2 studies; 258 neonates; RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.56 to 2.95). CONCLUSION: Very-low certainty evidence suggests that a short antibiotic course, compared to a standard course, does not affect treatment failure rates in culture-negative neonatal sepsis. There is a need for well-designed RCTs powered enough to assess critical outcomes such as mortality and neurological sequelae to generate stronger evidence and inform guidelines. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023437199.


Prolonged antibiotic usage has been associated with increased mortality and morbidity in neonates. The standard practice in culture-negative neonatal sepsis has been to administer antibiotics for 5­7 days, based on expert consensus. In this systematic review, a short course of antibiotics (2­4 days), in comparison to a standard course (5­7 days), did not affect the treatment failure rates in culture-negative neonatal sepsis. However, the certainty of evidence was too low to make robust conclusions. There is a need for well-designed large trials to generate stronger evidence and inform guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiempo de Internación
9.
Mikrochim Acta ; 191(2): 106, 2024 01 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38240873

RESUMEN

Given the long-life expectancy of the newborn, research aimed at improving sepsis diagnosis and management in this population has been recognized as cost-effective, which at early stages continues to be a tremendous challenge. Despite there is not an ideal-specific biomarker, the simultaneous detection of biomarkers with different behavior during an infection such as procalcitonin (PCT) as high specificity biomarker with one of the earliest biomarkers in sepsis as interleukin-6 (IL-6) increases diagnostic performance. This is not only due to their high positive predictive value but also, since it can also help the clinician to rule out infection and thus avoid the use of antibiotics, due to their high negative predictive value. To this end, we explore a cutting-edge micromotor (MM)-based OFF-ON dual aptassay for simultaneous determination of both biomarkers in 15 min using just 2 µL of sample from low-birth-weight neonates with gestational age less than 32 weeks and birthweight below 1000 g with clinical suspicion of late-onset sepsis. The approach reached the high sensitivities demanded in the clinical scenario (LODPCT = 0.003 ng/mL, LODIL6 = 0.15 pg/mL) with excellent correlation performance (r > 0.9990, p < 0.05) of the MM-based approach with the Hospital method for both biomarkers during the analysis of diagnosed samples and reliability (Er < 6% for PCT, and Er < 4% for IL-6). The proposed approach also encompasses distinctive technical attributes in a clinical scenario since its minimal sample volume requirements and expeditious results compatible with few easy-to-obtain drops of heel stick blood samples from newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. This would enable the monitoring of both sepsis biomarkers within the initial hours after the manifestation of symptoms in high-risk neonates as a valuable tool in facilitating prompt and well-informed decisions about the initiation of antibiotic therapy.These results revealed the asset behind micromotor technology for multiplexing analysis in diagnosing neonatal sepsis, opening new avenues in low sample volume-based diagnostics.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Lactante , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Calcitonina , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Interleucina-6 , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
10.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab ; 37(3): 243-249, 2024 Mar 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38235510

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify perinatal risk factors associated with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia in neonates. Secondary objectives included an examination of clinical and biochemical characteristics at the time of diagnosis and an exploration of the duration of diazoxide therapy. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted, involving individual chart reviews of inborn infants diagnosed with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (the HH group) between 2014 and 2021. These cases were paired with controls (the non-HH group) belonging to the same gestational age (GA) strata who did not exhibit HH or only had transient postnatal hypoglycemia. RESULTS: A total of 52 infants with HH were matched with corresponding controls. The mean GA in the HH group was 34.4 ± 3.1 weeks. Notably, the HH group exhibited lower mean minimum plasma glucose (PG) levels and required higher glucose infusion rates in comparison to the non-HH group (26.5 ± 15.6 vs. 49.1 ± 37.7 mg/dL and 12.9 ± 3.8 vs. 5.7 ± 2.1 mg/kg/min, respectively; p<0.001 for both). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, only two variables, fetal growth restriction (FGR) and neonatal sepsis, demonstrated significant associations with HH (adjusted odds ratio [95 % confidence interval]: 8.1 [2.1-31.0], p=0.002 and 6.3 [1.9-21.4], p=0.003, respectively). The median duration of diazoxide therapy for the HH group was 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: FGR and neonatal sepsis emerged as notable risk factors for HH. These infants exhibited lower PG levels and necessitated higher glucose infusion rates compared to their non-HH counterparts. Importantly, a substantial proportion of the HH group received diazoxide therapy, with a median treatment duration of 4 months.


Asunto(s)
Hiperinsulinismo , Hipoglucemia , Sepsis Neonatal , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Diazóxido/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Sepsis Neonatal/inducido químicamente , Sepsis Neonatal/complicaciones , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemia/complicaciones , Hiperinsulinismo/complicaciones , Hiperinsulinismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperinsulinismo/epidemiología , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , Glucosa/uso terapéutico
11.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(3S): S807-S840, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38233317

RESUMEN

Clinical chorioamnionitis, the most common infection-related diagnosis in labor and delivery units, is an antecedent of puerperal infection and neonatal sepsis. The condition is suspected when intrapartum fever is associated with two other maternal and fetal signs of local or systemic inflammation (eg, maternal tachycardia, uterine tenderness, maternal leukocytosis, malodorous vaginal discharge or amniotic fluid, and fetal tachycardia). Clinical chorioamnionitis is a syndrome caused by intraamniotic infection, sterile intraamniotic inflammation (inflammation without bacteria), or systemic maternal inflammation induced by epidural analgesia. In cases of uncertainty, a definitive diagnosis can be made by analyzing amniotic fluid with methods to detect bacteria (Gram stain, culture, or microbial nucleic acid) and inflammation (white blood cell count, glucose concentration, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, matrix metalloproteinase-8). The most common microorganisms are Ureaplasma species, and polymicrobial infections occur in 70% of cases. The fetal attack rate is low, and the rate of positive neonatal blood cultures ranges between 0.2% and 4%. Intrapartum antibiotic administration is the standard treatment to reduce neonatal sepsis. Treatment with ampicillin and gentamicin have been recommended by professional societies, although other antibiotic regimens, eg, cephalosporins, have been used. Given the importance of Ureaplasma species as a cause of intraamniotic infection, consideration needs to be given to the administration of antimicrobial agents effective against these microorganisms such as azithromycin or clarithromycin. We have used the combination of ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, and metronidazole, which has been shown to eradicate intraamniotic infection with microbiologic studies. Routine testing of neonates born to affected mothers for genital mycoplasmas could improve the detection of neonatal sepsis. Clinical chorioamnionitis is associated with decreased uterine activity, failure to progress in labor, and postpartum hemorrhage; however, clinical chorioamnionitis by itself is not an indication for cesarean delivery. Oxytocin is often administered for labor augmentation, and it is prudent to have uterotonic agents at hand to manage postpartum hemorrhage. Infants born to mothers with clinical chorioamnionitis near term are at risk for early-onset neonatal sepsis and for long-term disability such as cerebral palsy. A frontier is the noninvasive assessment of amniotic fluid to diagnose intraamniotic inflammation with a transcervical amniotic fluid collector and a rapid bedside test for IL-8 for patients with ruptured membranes. This approach promises to improve diagnostic accuracy and to provide a basis for antimicrobial administration.


Asunto(s)
Corioamnionitis , Sepsis Neonatal , Hemorragia Posparto , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Humanos , Corioamnionitis/diagnóstico , Corioamnionitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Corioamnionitis/etiología , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Posparto/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Líquido Amniótico/microbiología , Inflamación/metabolismo , Taquicardia
12.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 30(1): 22-27, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36871829

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) is challenging, and inflammatory markers are widely used to guide decision-making and therapies. OBJECTIVES: This narrative review presents the current state of knowledge regarding the diagnostic value and potential pitfalls in the interpretation of inflammatory markers for EOS. SOURCES: PubMed until October 2022 and searched references in identified articles using the search terms: neonatal EOS, biomarker or inflammatory marker, and antibiotic therapy or antibiotic stewardship. CONTENT: In situations with a high or low probability of sepsis, the measurements of inflammatory markers have no impact on the decision to start or stop antibiotics and are just gimmick, whereas they may be a game changer for neonates with intermediate risk and therefore an unclear situation. There is no single or combination of inflammatory markers that can predict EOS with high probability, allowing us to make decisions regarding the start of antibiotics based only on inflammatory markers. The main reason for the limited accuracy is most probably the numerous noninfectious conditions that influence the levels of inflammatory markers. However, there is evidence that C-reactive protein and procalcitonin have good negative predictive accuracy to rule out sepsis within 24 to 48 hours. Nevertheless, several publications have reported more investigations and prolonged antibiotic treatments with the use of inflammatory markers. Given the limitations of current strategies, using an algorithm with only moderate diagnostic accuracy may have a positive impact, as reported for the EOS calculator and the NeoPInS algorithm. IMPLICATIONS: As the decision regarding the start of antibiotic therapy is different from the process of stopping antibiotics, the accuracy of inflammatory markers needs to be evaluated separately. Novel machine learning-based algorithms are required to improve accuracy in the diagnosis of EOS. In the future, inflammatory markers included in algorithms may be a game changer reducing bias and noise in the decision-making process.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis
13.
J Pediatr (Rio J) ; 100(1): 100-107, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37758173

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of the sepsis risk calculator and the serial clinical observation in the management of late preterm and term newborns with infectious risk factors. METHOD: Single-center, observational, two-phase cohort study comparing the rates of neonates born ≥35 weeks' gestation, ≥2000 g birthweight, and without major congenital anomalies, who were screened and/or received antibiotics for early-onset neonatal sepsis risk at our center during two periods, before (January/2018-June/2019) and after (July/2019-December/2020) the implementation of the sepsis risk calculator. RESULTS: A total of 1796 (Period 1) and 1867 (Period 2) patients with infectious risk factors were included. During the second period, tests to rule out sepsis were reduced by 34.0 % (RR, 95 %CI): 0.66 (0.61, 0.71), blood cultures by 13.1 %: 0.87 (0.77, 0.98), hospital admissions by 13.5 %: 0.86 (0.76, 0.98) and antibiotic administration by 45.9 %: 0.54 (0.47, 0.63). Three cases of early-onset neonatal sepsis occurred in the first period and two in the second. Clinical serial evaluation would have detected all true cases. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a sepsis risk calculator in the management of newborns ≥35 weeks GA, ≥2000 g birthweight, without major congenital anomalies, with infectious risk factors is safe and adequate to reduce laboratory tests, blood cultures, hospital admissions, and antibiotics administration. Serial clinical observation, in addition, could be instrumental to achieve or even improve this goal.


Asunto(s)
Corioamnionitis , Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis Neonatal/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Peso al Nacer , Corioamnionitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Pediatrics ; 153(1)2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38093660

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previously published neonatal antibiotic stewardship efforts have been primarily implemented in single centers. Piedmont Athens Regional began work to decrease antibiotic use in the NICU with spread to the newborn nursery (NBN) and, subsequently, 13 other NICUs and NBNs throughout a health care system over a 4-year period. METHODS: This quality improvement initiative was conducted in the context of a multicenter learning collaborative from 2016 to 2019. The primary aim was a 10% reduction in antibiotic days per 1000 patient days (antibiotic utilization rate [AUR]) among newborns in the NICU and NBN at each hospital by December 2018. Change ideas were implemented by using plan-do-study-act cycles. The primary outcome measure was AUR with a balancing measure of antibiotic restarts. RESULTS: Piedmont Athens Regional decreased the NICU AUR by 46% and NBN AUR by 83%. Piedmont Healthcare decreased the NICU AUR by 40% and NBN AUR by 74%. Seven of 8 NICUs and 5 of 7 NBNs achieved a >10% reduction in AUR and 8 of 8 intervention hospitals showed a sustained drop in AUR in the NBN, NICU, or both during the 1.5-year postobservation period. Decreases in antibiotic initiation resulted in 335 fewer antibiotic courses in the NICU and 189 fewer infants started on antibiotics in the NBN in 2020 versus 2017. CONCLUSIONS: This initiative achieved reductions in AUR across multiple hospitals in the network. The system-wide approach facilitated information technology (IT) and electronic health record modifications. Common drivers of NICU improvement were involvement for at least 2 years, multidisciplinary teams, and the highest baseline AUR. The common driver of nursery improvement was the implementation of a neonatal sepsis risk calculator.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Sepsis Neonatal , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/métodos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria
15.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 43(1): 56-62, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37725828

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neonatal sepsis is one of the leading causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Blood culture positivity rates and antibiotic resistance pattern of neonatal sepsis differs across various regions. This study aims to identify clinical cofactors associated with blood culture-proven neonatal sepsis and in vitro resistance to first-line antibiotics (ampicillin and gentamicin) from cases originating in a tertiary healthcare center in Surabaya, Indonesia. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2020 to August 2022 by utilizing secondary data collected from standardized electronic medical records. Microbiologic characteristics and associated factors were statistically analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Across 266 neonatal sepsis cases, 46.9% were culture-proven and 79.2% of confirmed sepsis were resistant to first-line antibiotics. The most common isolated pathogen is Klebsiella pneumoniae , followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococci , Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacter cloacae . Extremely preterm delivery [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 5.813; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.70-19.91] and late-onset sepsis (aOR: 9.165; 95% CI: 5.12-16.40) were associated with culture-proven neonatal sepsis. Increased odds of resistance to first-line antibiotics were identified in extremely preterm (<28 weeks) or very-preterm delivery (28 to <32 weeks) (aOR: 50.80; 95% CI: 1.66-1554.21 and aOR: 45.679; 95% CI: 3.22-647.46, respectively), cesarean section (aOR: 4.149; 95% CI: 1.04-16.53) and an absence of antenatal corticosteroid use (aOR: 0.233; 95% CI: 0.07-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The association between clinical cofactors with culture-proven sepsis and antibiotic resistance emphasizes the importance for clinicians to adjust empirical antibiotic regimens based on the local antibiogram and resource availability.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis Neonatal/epidemiología , Sepsis Neonatal/etiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Indonesia/epidemiología , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico
16.
Pediatr Neonatol ; 65(1): 71-75, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652825

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Overuse of empirical intravenous antibiotics in neonates in high-income countries (HICs) is well documented. The Kaiser Permanente neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator is an evidence-based sepsis risk assessment tool that has demonstrated potential to reduce antibiotic usage in this population. The incidence of early-onset sepsis in most HICs is 0.4-0.8 per 1000 live births. The objective was to evaluate the calculator's impact on antibiotic rates and length of stay in a regional level II Special Care Nursery. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective cohort study compared antibiotic administration rates in the first 72 h in neonates ≥35 weeks gestation born during two 6-month periods in 2019 (pre-EOS calculator) and 2021 (post-EOS calculator). Electronic and paper case records were accessed to capture data. Continuous data were summarised using mean and standard deviation, and categorical data were summarized using frequency distributions. There were 951 (2019) and 1129 (2021) infants born during the study periods. RESULTS: Following implementation of the calculator, antibiotic exposure decreased from 13.7% to 4.7% of all neonates without reported negative outcomes. Mean length of stay for neonates born across the two periods decreased from 2.38 to 2.13 days. Indications for antibiotic use shifted more towards clinical condition and away from obstetric risk factors. There were no culture-proven cases of sepsis or readmissions with EOS in either period. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the EOS calculator significantly reduced exposure to antibiotics, without adverse outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis Neonatal/epidemiología , Australia Occidental , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/epidemiología
18.
BJOG ; 131(3): 246-255, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37691261

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A systematic review with met-analysis was performed to summarise the evidence on the effect of intrapartum azithromycin on maternal and neonatal infections and deaths. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched in March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing intrapartum single-dose of azithromycin with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Maternal infections, maternal mortality, neonatal sepsis, neonatal mortality. We used the random-effects Mantel-Haenszel method to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). We assessed risk of bias of the included studies and estimated the evidence certainty using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: After screening 410 abstracts, five studies with 44 190 women and 44 565 neonates were included. The risk of bias was low in four and had some concerns in one of the studies. The risk of endometritis was 1.5% in the azithromycin group and 2.3% in the placebo group (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.55-0.75), and the evidence certainty was high. The respective risk for chorioamnionitis was 0.05% and 0.1% (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22-1.18; evidence certainty moderate). The wound infection rate was lower in the azithromycin group (1.6%) than in the placebo group (2.5%), RR 0.52 (95% CI 0.30-0.89; moderate certainty evidence). The maternal sepsis rate was 1.1% in the azithromycin group and 1.7% in the placebo group (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.77; evidence certainty high). Mortality rates did not show evidence of a difference (0.09% versus 0.08%; RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.65-2.42; moderate certainty evidence). The neonatal mortality rate was 0.7% in the azithromycin group and 0.8% in the placebo group (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.76-1.16; moderate certainty evidence). The neonatal sepsis rate was 7.6% in the azithromycin group and 7.4% in the placebo group (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96-1.09; moderate certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Intrapartum administration of azithromycin to the mother reduces maternal postpartum infections, including sepsis. Impact on maternal mortality remains undecided. Azithromycin does not reduce neonatal sepsis or mortality rates.


Asunto(s)
Azitromicina , Sepsis Neonatal , Periodo Periparto , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Sepsis , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Azitromicina/administración & dosificación , Corioamnionitis/epidemiología , Corioamnionitis/prevención & control , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis Neonatal/mortalidad , Sepsis Neonatal/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
19.
Neonatology ; 121(1): 56-64, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37906986

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Compared with multivariate risk assessment, traditional category-based risk assessment (CRA) approaches for neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) screening are usually straightforward to use, do not require electronic devices, but are associated with higher rates of antibiotic use. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a novel enhanced CRA (eCRA) framework on EOS admissions and antibiotic use and to investigate whether a modified version with adjustments in risk factor weighting can allow its performance to match the EOS calculator while remaining easy to implement. METHOD: This is a prospective, single-center, two-phase observational study. Infants of all gestations delivered in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong with risk factors or clinical features of EOS were recruited. PHASE I: A novel eCRA framework (period 2) was compared with the CDC 2010-based protocol (period 1). PHASE II: A modified eCRA framework was compared theoretically with the EOS calculator. EOS-specific admissions and antibiotic use were measured. RESULTS: Phase I: 1,025 at-risk infants were recruited during period 2 and compared with 757 infants of period 1. Admissions and antibiotic use decreased from 45.8% to 29.4% and 41.1% to 28.2%, respectively. Antibiotics among those at-risk but well-appearing infants decreased from 25.3% to 16.3% (p < 0.001 for all). PHASE II: antibiotic use was similar (7.3 vs. 6.4%, p = 0.42) between the modified eCRA framework and the EOS calculator. CONCLUSIONS: An eCRA framework can effectively and safely provide individualized guidance for EOS screening without the need for tools such as the EOS calculator.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/diagnóstico
20.
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol ; 13(3): 464-475, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38108548

RESUMEN

Antimicrobial resistance increasingly complicates neonatal sepsis in a global context. Fosfomycin and amikacin are two agents being tested in an ongoing multicenter neonatal sepsis trial. Although neonatal pharmacokinetics (PKs) have been described for these drugs, the physiological variability within neonatal populations makes population PKs in this group uncertain. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed in Simcyp for fosfomycin and amikacin sequentially for adult, pediatric, and neonatal populations, with visual and quantitative validation compared to observed data at each stage. Simulations were performed using the final validated neonatal models to determine drug exposures for each drug across a demographic range, with probability of target attainment (PTA) assessments. Successfully validated neonatal PBPK models were developed for both fosfomycin and amikacin. PTA analysis demonstrated high probability of target attainment for amikacin 15 mg/kg i.v. q24h and fosfomycin 100 mg/kg (in neonates aged 0-7 days) or 150 mg/kg (in neonates aged 7-28 days) i.v. q12h for Enterobacterales with fosfomycin and amikacin minimum inhibitory concentrations at the adult breakpoints. Repeat analysis in premature populations demonstrated the same result. PTA analysis for a proposed combination fosfomycin-amikacin target was also performed. The simulated regimens, tested in a neonatal sepsis trial, are likely to be adequate for neonates across different postnatal ages and gestational age. This work demonstrates a template for determining target attainment for antimicrobials (alone or in combination) in special populations without sufficient available PK data to otherwise assess with traditional pharmacometric methods.


Asunto(s)
Fosfomicina , Sepsis Neonatal , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Amicacina/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Fosfomicina/farmacocinética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA