A Comprehensive Study to Determine the Residual Elimination Pattern of Major Metabolites of Amoxicillin-Sulbactam Hybrid Molecules in Rats by UPLC-MS/MS.

Amoxicillin and sulbactam are widely used in animal food compounding. Amoxicillin-sulbactam hybrid molecules are bicester compounds made by linking amoxicillin and sulbactam with methylene groups and have good application prospects. However, the residual elimination pattern of these hybrid molecules in animals needs to be explored. In the present study, the amoxicillin-sulbactam hybrid molecule (AS group) and a mixture of amoxicillin and sulbactam (mixture group) were administered to rats by gavage, and the levels of the major metabolites of amoxicillin, amoxicilloic acid, amoxicillin diketopiperazine, and sulbactam were determined by UPLC-MS/MS. The residue elimination patterns of the major metabolites in the liver, kidney, urine, and feces of rats in the AS group and the mixture group were compared. The results showed that the total amount of amoxicillin, amoxicilloic acid, amoxicillin diketopiperazine, and the highest concentration of sulbactam in the liver and kidney samples of the AS group and the mixture group appeared at 1 h after drug withdrawal. Between 1 h and 12 h post discontinuation, the total amount of amoxicillin, amoxicilloic acid, and amoxicillin diketopiperazine in the two tissues decreased rapidly, and the elimination half-life of the AS group was significantly higher than that in the mixture group (p < 0.05); the residual amount of sulbactam also decreased rapidly, and the elimination half-life was not significantly different (p > 0.05). In 72 h urine samples, the total excretion rates were 60.61 ± 2.13% and 62.62 ± 1.73% in the AS group and mixture group, respectively. The total excretion rates of fecal samples (at 72 h) for the AS group and mixture group were 9.54 ± 0.26% and 10.60 ± 0.24%, respectively. These results showed that the total quantity of amoxicillin, amoxicilloic acid, and amoxicillin diketopiperazine was eliminated more slowly in the liver and kidney of the AS group than those of the mixture group and that the excretion rate through urine and feces was essentially the same for both groups. The residual elimination pattern of the hybrid molecule in rats determined in this study provides a theoretical basis for the in-depth development and application of hybrid molecules, as well as guidelines for the development of similar drugs.

Prediction of Tissue Exposures of Meropenem, Colistin, and Sulbactam in Pediatrics Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

BACKGROUND: The combination of polymyxins, meropenem, and sulbactam demonstrated efficacy against multi-drug-resistant bacillus Acinetobacter baumannii. These three antibiotics are commonly used against major blood, skin, lung, and heart muscle infections. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to predict drug disposition and extrapolate the efficacy in these tissues using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach that linked drug exposures to their target pharmacodynamic indices associated with antimicrobial activities against A. baumannii. METHODS: An adult physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed for meropenem, colistin, and sulbactam and scaled to pediatrics accounting for both renal and non-renal clearances. The model reliability was evaluated by comparing simulated plasma and tissue drug exposures to observed data. Target pharmacodynamic indices were used to evaluate whether pediatric and adult dosing regimens provided sufficient coverage. RESULTS: The modeled plasma drug exposures in adults and pediatric patients were consistent with reported literature data. The mean fold errors for meropenem, colistin, and sulbactam were in the range of 0.710-1.37, 0.981-1.47, and 0.647-1.39, respectively. Simulated exposures in the blood, skin, lung, and heart were consistent with reported penetration rates. In a virtual pediatric population aged from 2 to < 18 years, the interpretive breakpoints were achieved in 85-90% of subjects for their targeted pharmacodynamic indices after administration of pediatric dosing regimens consisting of 30 mg/kg of meropenem, and 40 mg/kg of sulbactam three times daily as a 3-h or continuous infusion and 5 mg/kg/day of colistin base activity. CONCLUSIONS: The physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling supports pediatric dosing regimens of meropenem/colistin/sulbactam in a co-administration setting against infections in the blood, lung, skin, and heart tissues due to A. baumannii.

Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Ampicillin-sulbactam in Pediatric Patients Using Plasma and Urine Data.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop population pharmacokinetic (PK) models of ampicillin and sulbactam using pooled data analysis and to optimize dosing regimens of ampicillin-sulbactam (combination ratio of 2:1) in pediatric patients. METHODS: Population PK models of ampicillin and sulbactam were separately developed by simultaneously fitting plasma and urine data from pediatric patients in 14 published studies. Based on these models, we estimated the probability of attaining a pharmacodynamic (PD) target [50% of time that free drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration, 50% fT > minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)] against MIC90 [MIC that blocked the growth of 90% of the strains] of common bacteria in community-acquired pneumonia. RESULTS: The analysis included 54 pediatric patients (0.083-16.42 years of age, 4.0-77.0 kg of body weight). A total of 284 plasma concentrations and 90 urinary excretions from 0 to 6 hours after administration were used for population PK modeling. The data were adequately described by 2-compartment models for ampicillin and sulbactam. Age was not a statistically significant covariate in the PK of either drug. The PK/PD breakpoint MICs for 45 mg/kg 3 times daily and 75 mg/kg 4 times daily (q.i.d.) were 0.25 and 1 µg/mL, respectively. For empiric therapy of community-acquired pneumonia, because MIC90 values for the main target pathogens is high (MIC90 = 2 µg/mL for Streptococcus pneumoniae and MIC90 = 4 µg/mL for Haemophilus influenzae), 75 mg/kg q.i.d. (Food and Drug Administration-approved maximum dosage in United States) might be better than 45 mg/kg 3 times daily (within approved dosage in Japan) to cover many pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: From the results of this PK/PD approach, 75 mg/kg q.i.d. (Food and Drug Administration-approved maximum dosage) should be recommended in the empiric therapy of community-acquired pneumonia.

Dosing Optimization of Ampicillin-Sulbactam Based on Cystatin C in Elderly Patients with Pneumonia.

Ampicillin-sulbactam is a first-line therapy for pneumonia and is mainly excreted by the kidney. It is important to optimize the dose and dosing interval of ampicillin-sulbactam because in patients with decreased renal function and low skeletal muscle mass, such as the elderly, excess drug may burden renal function. In this study, we evaluated indices of renal function and optimized the dose and dosing interval of ampicillin-sulbactam based on pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics theory in elderly patients. The serum concentrations of ampicillin and sulbactam were measured by HPLC, and PK parameters were calculated. Correlations between the clearance of ampicillin or sulbactam and renal function were evaluated, and dosing optimization was calculated based on PK parameters. The PK parameters of ampicillin were CL = 6.5 ± 4.0 L/h, Vd = 19.3 ± 0.2 L, Ke = 0.4 ± 0.2, and t1/2 = 2.7 ± 1.6 h. The most correlated renal function index was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcys-c) calculated by serum cystatin-c (r = 0.7374, correlation formula; CL of ampicillin = 0.1937 × eGFRcys-c-0.6726). Based on this formula, we calculated the clearance of ampicillin and developed dosing regimens for the elderly. Serum cystatin-c concentration is an ideal index to optimize ampicillin-sulbactam antimicrobial therapy in elderly patients with pneumonia.

Semi-mechanistic PK/PD modelling of meropenem and sulbactam combination against carbapenem-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii.

Due to limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB) infections, antibiotic combinations are commonly used. In this study, we explored the potential efficacy of meropenem-sulbactam combination (MEM/SUL) against CR-AB. The checkerboard method was used to screen for synergistic activity of MEM/SUL against 50 clinical CR-AB isolates. Subsequently, time-kill studies against two CR-AB isolates were performed. Time-kill data were described using a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Subsequently, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of 2-log kill, 1-log kill or stasis at 24-h following combination therapy. The MEM/SUL demonstrated synergy against 28/50 isolates. No antagonism was observed. The MIC50 and MIC90 of MEM/SUL were decreased fourfold, compared to the monotherapy MIC. In the time-kill studies, the combination displayed synergistic killing against both isolates at the highest clinically achievable concentrations. At concentrations equal to the fractional inhibitory concentration, synergism was observed against one isolate. The PK/PD model adequately delineated the data and the interaction between meropenem and sulbactam. The effect of the combination was driven by sulbactam, with meropenem acting as a potentiator. The simulations of various dosing regimens revealed no activity for the monotherapies. At best, the MEM/SUL regimen of 2 g/4 g every 8 h demonstrated a probability of target attainment of 2-log10 kill at 24 h of 34%. The reduction in the MIC values and the achievement of a moderate PTA of a 2-log10 reduction in bacterial burden demonstrated that MEM/SUL may potentially be effective against some CR-AB infections.

Effects of dosing frequency on the clinical efficacy of ampicillin/sulbactam in Japanese elderly patients with pneumonia: A single-center retrospective observational study.

This study sought to investigate whether dosing frequency (the number of doses per day) affects the antimicrobial efficacy and safety of ampicillin/sulbactam (ABPC/SBT) in Japanese elderly pneumonia patients treated with ABPC/SBT at 6 g/day. This was a retrospective observational study that included hospitalized elderly patients (aged ≥75 years, 10 ml/min ≤CLcr <50 ml/min) who received 3 g every 12 h (BID; n = 61) or 1.5 g every 6 h (QID; n = 45) for the treatment of pneumonia. The primary endpoint was clinical response, assessed by measuring body temperature, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein levels. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations were conducted in silico to rationalize the clinical findings. The clinical response rates (extremely effective and effective) in the BID and QID groups were 36.1% and 55.6%, respectively (p = .0459). QID tended to be more effective in patients with gram-negative rods detected (p = .0563). According to the simulated minimum plasma ABPC concentrations at steady state for BID and QID were 2.5 and 7.3 µg/ml, respectively (p < .0001). Based on the simulated time above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), pharmacological (not clinical) efficacy was predicted to be higher with QID. Both groups had similar safety profiles. The main adverse event in both groups was liver damage. The present retrospective survey demonstrated that ABPC/SBT treatment for elderly patients with pneumonia and renal dysfunction was more effective with QID than with BID. Therefore, the QID regimen is worthy of consideration to improve the clinical outcomes of ABPC/SBT therapy in the present patient population.

Enhanced bacterial killing with colistin/sulbactam combination against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

AIMS: Polymyxin-based combination therapy is often used to treat carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) infections. Although sulbactam is intrinsically active against A. baumannii, few studies have investigated colistin/sulbactam combinations against carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. METHODS: Whole genome sequencing was undertaken on eight carbapenem-resistant (colistin-susceptible) isolates of A. baumannii from Chinese patients. Bacterial killing of colistin and sulbactam, alone and in combination, was examined with checkerboard (all isolates) and static and dynamic time-kill studies (three isolates). In the dynamic studies, antibiotics were administered in various clinically-relevant dosing regimens that mimicked patient pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: The eight isolates consisted of ST195, ST191 and ST208 belonging to clonal complex 208, which is the most epidemic clonal type of A. baumannii globally. All isolates possessed Acinetobacter-derived cephalosporinase (ADC-61 or ADC-78) and seven of eight isolates contained the carbapenem-resistance gene blaOXA-23. The colistin/sulbactam combination was synergistic against two of eight isolates in checkerboard studies. In time-kill studies, rapid bacterial killing of ca. 3-6 log10 CFU/mL was observed with colistin monotherapy, followed by steady regrowth. Sulbactam monotherapy was generally ineffective. Substantially enhanced bacterial killing was observed with colistin/sulbactam combinations in both static and dynamic models, especially with the higher sulbactam concentration (2 g) and/or longer sulbactam infusion time (2 hours) in the dynamic model. CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to use a pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics model to investigate synergistic activity of colistin/sulbactam combinations against A. baumannii. It showed that clinically-relevant dosing regimens of colistin combined with sulbactam may substantially improve bacterial killing of multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii.

Prostatic Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Ampicillin-Sulbactam for Bacterial Prostatitis and Preoperative Prophylaxis.

This study aims to define the penetration of ampicillin and sulbactam into prostate tissue, develop a prostatic pharmacokinetic model of each drug, and assess the appropriateness of ampicillin-sulbactam regimens for the treatment of prostatitis and the prophylaxis of postoperative infection, based on a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulation. Subjects were prostatic hyperplasia patients prophylactically receiving a 0.5-hour infusion of 1.5 g (1:0.5 g) or 3 g (2:1 g) ampicillin-sulbactam before transurethral resection of the prostate. Ampicillin and sulbactam concentrations in plasma and prostate tissue were measured. The prostate tissue/plasma ratios of both ampicillin and sulbactam were approximately 0.37 (area under the drug concentration-time curve), and penetration was similar. The prostatic population pharmacokinetic model, which included a covariate analysis, adequately predicted prostate tissue concentrations in our patient population. For therapeutic use, aiming for a bactericidal target of 50% of time above minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC) in prostate tissue, 3 g ampicillin-sulbactam 4 times daily achieved ≥90% expected probability against only Enterococcus faecalis in typical patients with a creatinine clearance (CLcr ) of 30 mL/min. For prophylactic use, aiming for a bacteriostatic target of 30% T > MIC, 3 g ampicillin-sulbactam 4 times daily achieved ≥90% expected probability of attaining the bacteriostatic target against E. faecalis and Proteus species when CLcr was 30 mL/min. Based on prostatic simulations, the present study provides helpful recommendations for the treatment of bacterial prostatitis and preoperative prophylaxis in prostatectomy.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Intravenous Sulbactam-Durlobactam with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Hospitalized Adults with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis.

Durlobactam (DUR; ETX2514) is a novel ß-lactamase inhibitor with broad-spectrum activity against Ambler class A, C, and D ß-lactamases. Durlobactam restores the in vitro activity of sulbactam (SUL) against members of the Acinetobacter baumannii-A. calcoaceticus complex (ABC). Sulbactam (SUL)-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) is under development for the treatment of ABC infections. Eighty patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis (AP), were randomized 2:1 to receive SUL-DUR at 1 g/1 g intravenously (i.v.) or placebo every 6 h (q6h) for 7 days and background therapy with imipenem-cilastatin (IMI) at 500 mg i.v. q6h to evaluate the tolerability of SUL-DUR in hospitalized patients. Patients with bacteremia could receive up to 14 days of therapy. SUL-DUR tolerability and the values of various pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined. Efficacy was recorded at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. SUL-DUR was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events (AEs) being reported. Headache (5.7%), nausea (3.8%), diarrhea (3.8%), and vascular pain (3.8%) were the most common drug-related AEs with SUL-DUR and were mostly of mild or moderate severity. The PK profile of DUR and SUL in hospitalized patients was consistent with observations in healthy volunteers. Overall success in the microbiological modified intent-to-treat (m-MITT) population was similar between the groups, as would be expected with IMI background therapy in all patients (overall success at the TOC visit, 76.6% [n = 36] with SUL-DUR and 81.0% [n = 17] with placebo). SUL-DUR in combination with IMI was well tolerated in patients with cUTIs. The pharmacokinetics of SUL-DUR observed in hospitalized patients was similar to that observed in healthy volunteers. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03445195.).

Pharmacodynamic Effects of Sulbactam/Meropenem/Polymyxin-B Combination Against Extremely Drug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Using Checkerboard Information.

Aim: The aims of the study are to evaluate the activity of sulbactam, meropenem, and polymyxin B alone and in combination against six isolates of extremely drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and to determine dosing regimens that achieve a sufficient joint probability of target attainment (PTA) based on combination antimicrobial pharmacodynamics. Materials and Methods: The combinations were evaluated by the checkerboard method and were considered synergistic when the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) ≤0.5. Pharmacodynamic analyses were carried out by evaluating dosing regimens that achieve ≥90% joint PTA at the percentage of time over a 24-h period wherein the free drug concentration is above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT> MIC) of 40% and 60% for meropenem and sulbactam, respectively, and 20 for the ratio of the area under the free drug concentration-time curve over MIC (fAUC/MIC) for polymyxin B. Results: For both polymyxin B-resistant and susceptible isolates, the addition of sulbactam in combination with meropenem and subinhibitory concentration of polymyxin B showed important synergistic activity (five isolates; FICI ≤0.281); the recommended dosing regimens were 2/4 g meropenem/sulbactam q8 hours and 0.5 mg/kg polymyxin B q12 hours. Conclusion: This in vitro study showed that sulbactam can significantly improve the action of meropenem and polymyxin B in OXA-producing A. baumannii isolates, especially when there are no new treatment options available for infections caused by these microorganisms.

Population pharmacokinetics and Monte Carlo simulations of sulbactam to optimize dosage regimens in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Acinetobacter baumannii.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii remains one of the leading causes of the high mortality rate in critically ill patients. Sulbactam has been considered as an alternative concomitant medication with other effective antimicrobial agents for the treatment of these MDR microorganisms. The aims of this study were (i) to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) and (ii) to assess the efficacy of various dosage regimens of sulbactam in terms of probability of target attainment (PTA). METHODS: The PK studies were carried out following administration of 2 g of sulbactam every 12 h on the 7th dose of drug administration in 16 patients with VAP, and a Monte Carlo simulation was performed to determine the PTA of achieving 40% and 60% the exposure time during which the total plasma drug concentration remained above the MIC (T>MIC). RESULTS: The volume of distribution and total clearance of sulbactam were 22.17 ±â€¯1.60 L and 6.76 ±â€¯2.37 L/h, respectively. For pathogens with a MIC of 8 µg/mL, the high PTAs of achieving (≥90%) 60% T>MIC in patients with serum albumin 1.7-2.4 g/dL and CLCR 90-120 mL/min following administration of sulbactam as a 4-h infusion of 1 g every 6 h, 2 g every 12 h, and 2 g every 8 h were 98.65%, 78.07% and 98.23%, respectively. For pathogens with a MIC of 16 µg/mL, the high PTAs of achieving (≥90%) 60% T>MIC in patients with serum albumin 1.7-2.4 g/dL and CLCR 90-120 mL/min following administration of sulbactam as a 4-h infusion of 2 g every 6 h, and 3 g every 8 h were 98.83% and 95.59%, respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that high dosage combination regimens are required for the treatment of life-threatening infections in critically ill patients with VAP.

Determination of cefoperazone and sulbactam in serum by HPLC-MS/MS: An adapted method for therapeutic drug monitoring in children.

A rapid, accurate and specific high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method has been validated for the simultaneous determination of cefoperazone and sulbactam in a small volume sample for children. A Shim-pack XR-ODS C18 column with gradient elution of water (0.1% formic acid) and acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid) solution was used for separation at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The calibration curves of two analytes in serum showed excellent linearity over the concentration ranges of 0.03-10 µg/mL for cefoperazone, and 0.01-3 µg/mL for sulbactam, respectively. This method involves simple sample preparation steps and was validated according to standard US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines in terms of selectivity, linearity, detection limits, matrix effects, accuracy, precision, recovery and stability. This assay can be easily implemented in clinical practice to determine concentrations of cefoperazone and sulbactam in children.

Pharmacokinetics of ampicillin-sulbactam in serum and synovial fluid samples following regional intravenous perfusion in the distal portion of a hind limb of adult cattle.

OBJECTIVE To describe concentration-over-time data for ampicillin and sulbactam in the digital and systemic circulations and synovial fluid (SYN) of cattle following a single injection of ampicillin-sulbactam as a regional IV perfusion (RIVP). ANIMALS 6 healthy adult nonlactating Jersey-crossbred cows. PROCEDURES The right hind limb of each cow was aseptically prepared. A tourniquet was applied around the midmetatarsal region, and 1.0 g of ampicillin with 0.5 g of sulbactam in a combined formulation was administered as an RIVP into the dorsal common digital vein (DCDV). Blood samples from the DCDV and jugular vein and SYN samples from the metatarsophalangeal joint of the prepared limb were collected immediately before and at predetermined times for 24 hours after RIVP. One blood sample was obtained from the abaxial proper plantar vein of the lateral digit of the prepared limb 0.25 hours after RIVP. Serum and SYN ampicillin and sulbactam concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS Mean ± SD maximum concentration of ampicillin in SYN and serum obtained from the abaxial proper plantar and jugular veins was 1,995 ± 1,011 µg/mL, 5,422 ± 1,953 µg/mL, and 2.5 ± 1.6 µg/mL, respectively. Corresponding serum and SYN concentrations of sulbactam were lower but followed the same pattern over time as those for ampicillin. Synovial fluid ampicillin concentration remained above 8 µg/mL for a mean time of 18.9 hours. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Potentially therapeutic concentrations of ampicillin were achieved in regional serum and SYN samples; SYN concentrations remained at potentially therapeutic values for > 12 hours following RIVP of 1.5 g of ampicillin-sulbactam in the hind limb of healthy cows.

General Method to Determine the Flux of Charged Molecules through Nanopores Applied to ß-Lactamase Inhibitors and OmpF.

A major challenge in the discovery of the new antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria is to achieve sufficiently fast permeation in order to avoid high doses causing toxic side effects. So far, suitable assays for quantifying the uptake of charged antibiotics into bacteria are lacking. We apply an electrophysiological zero-current assay using concentration gradients of ß-lactamase inhibitors combined with single-channel conductance to quantify their flux rates through OmpF. Molecular dynamic simulations provide in addition details on the interactions between the nanopore wall and the charged solutes. In particular, the interaction barrier for three ß-lactamase inhibitors is surprisingly as low as 3-5 kcal/mol and only slightly above the diffusion barrier of ions such as chloride. Within our macroscopic constant field model, we determine that at a zero-membrane potential a concentration gradient of 10 µM of avibactam, sulbactam, or tazobactam can create flux rates of roughly 620 molecules/s per OmpF trimer.

High-Dose Ampicillin-Sulbactam Combinations Combat Polymyxin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Acinetobacter baumannii is emerging with resistance to polymyxins. In 24-h time-kill experiments, high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam in combination with meropenem and polymyxin B achieved additivity or synergy against 108 CFU/ml of two clinical A. baumannii isolates resistant to all three drugs (maximum reductions, 1.6 and 3.1 logs). In a 14-day hollow-fiber infection model, high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam (8/4 g every 8 h, respectively) in combination with meropenem (2 g every 8 h) and polymyxin B (1.43 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h with loading dose) resulted in rapid (96 h) eradication of A. baumannii.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Modeling To Optimize Dosage Regimens of Sulbactam in Critically Ill Patients with Severe Sepsis Caused by Acinetobacter baumannii.

Sulbactam is being considered as an alternative concomitant medication with other effective antibiotics for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Pathophysiological changes in critically ill patients with severe sepsis, resulting in altered pharmacokinetic (PK) patterns for antibiotics, are important factors in determining therapeutic success. The aims of this study were (i) to examine the population PK parameters and (ii) to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) for sulbactam in patients with severe sepsis caused by A. baumannii PK studies were carried out following administration of 2 g of sulbactam every 12 h on the 4th day of drug administration in 27 patients, and a Monte Carlo simulation was performed to determine the PTA of achieving 40% exposure time during which the plasma drug concentration remained above the MIC (T>MIC) and 60% T>MIC The central and peripheral volumes of distribution were 14.56 and 9.55 liters, respectively, and total clearances of sulbactam were 2.26 liters/h and 7.64 liters/h in patients aged >65 years and ≤65 years, respectively. The high PTAs (≥90%) for targets of 40% T>MIC and 60% T>MIC with a MIC of 4 µg/ml were observed when sulbactam was administered by a 4-h infusion of 1 g every 12 h and 1 g every 8 h, respectively. Sulbactam would be an alternative antibiotic option to coadminister with colistin for the treatment of infections caused by MDR A. baumannii However, for pathogens with MICs of >4 µg/ml, higher dosage regimens of sulbactam are required.

The pharmacokinetics of ampicillin-sulbactam in anuric patients: dosing optimization for prophylaxis during cardiovascular surgery.

Background The administration of antibiotic prophylaxis during cardiothoracic surgery can reduce the rate of surgical site infections. Trials of cardiothoracic antibiotic prophylaxis have found it to be beneficial in preventing postoperative wound infections. Objective To determine the more appropriate timing of repeated doses of ampicillin-sulbactam to maintain adequate antibiotic concentrations during cardiovascular surgery in anuric patients. Method Five adult anuric dialysis patients who received ampicillin-sulbactam during cardiovascular surgery at Kagoshima University Hospital, the total plasma concentrations of ampicillin and sulbactam were monitored after ampicillin (1 g)-sulbactam (0.5 g) administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated and used to predict the free plasma concentrations of ampicillin and sulbactam. Results The mean values for the volume of distribution, total clearance, elimination rate constant and the elimination half-life for ampicillin were 8.9 ± 2.4 L, 1.69 ± 0.93 L/h, 0.180 ± 0.059 h(-1) and 4.23 ± 1.48 h, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those of sulbactam. When ampicillin (1 g)-sulbactam (0.5 g) was intravenously administered at 8, 12 and 24 h intervals, the predicted free trough plasma concentrations of ampicillin were 28.72, 12.06 and 1.25 µg/mL, respectively. Conclusion We suggest that ampicillin (1 g)-sulbactam (0.5 g) should be intravenously administered every 12 h in order to maintain a free ampicillin concentration of more than 12 µg/mL in anuric patients during cardiovascular surgery.

Pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone/sulbactam in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration.

PURPOSE: Cefoperazone/sulbactam (CFP/SUL) is a ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination with little data available for the development of effective dosing guidelines during continuous renal replacement therapy. This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of cefoperazone/sulbactam in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). METHODS: A prospective, single-center, and open-label study was conducted. Critically ill patients receiving CVVH with 3 g cefoperazone/sulbactam (2.0/1.0 g) intravenously every 8 h were recruited. Serial blood and ultrafiltrate samples were paired collected for initial dose (occasion 1) and steady state (occasion 2). PK was assessed by non-compartmental analysis, and pharmacodynamics (PD) was evaluated by the percent of time for which drug concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (%T >MIC). RESULTS: Total fourteen patients were enrolled. Volume of distribution at steady state (V ss) of cefoperazone and sulbactam for initial doses (20.8 ± and 28.4 L, respectively) increased significantly compared with those in healthy volunteers (P = 0.009 for CFP, P = 0.030 for SUL). Both cefoperazone and sulbactam showed significantly lower total clearance (CLt) (46.2 and 117.6 mL/min, respectively) compared with healthy volunteers (P = 0.000 for CFP, P = 0.017 for SUL). There is no significant difference in PK between occasion 1 and occasion 2 (P > 0.05). For occasion 1, mean CVVH clearance accounted for 34.3 and 33.9 % for CLt of cefoperazone and sulbactam, respectively. The minimum PD target of 60%T >MIC was achieved in seven of eight patients. For occasion 2, eight of nine patients achieved cefoperazone concentrations that were above the MIC for the entire dosing interval. CONCLUSIONS: PK of cefoperazone/sulbactam was altered in critically ill patients undergoing CVVH. Therapeutic drug monitoring would be recommended to individualize the dose regimen.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Fixed Dose Combination of Ceftriaxone and Sulbactam in Healthy and Infected Subjects.

Increased antibacterial resistance (ABR) and limited drug discovery warrant optimized use of available antibiotics. One option is to rationally combine two antibiotics (fixed dose combination (FDC)) that may delay or prevent emergence of ABR in notorious pathogen. Major concern with FDC is the mutual interaction of its components that might influence their pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, requiring reassessing of whole formulation (adding cost and time). The interaction can be identified by comparing PK profile of a drug present in FDC with its independent entity. An open-label, crossover, single-dose comparative PK study of FDC (ceftriaxone and sulbactam) with their individual reference formulations was performed in 24 healthy adult subjects. No mutual PK interactions between ceftriaxone and sulbactam were observed. Pharmacokinetic data was used to develop a population-PK model to understand between-subject variability (BSV). Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone/sulbactam was explained by one and two compartment models, respectively. The subject's "weight" was identified as a covariate explaining BSV. Both internal and external validations (healthy/infected subjects) were done. The model-derived population-PK parameters of FDC's active components in infected subjects were similar to literature reported values of individual components. Efficacies of various FDC dosage regimens over a range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were assessed by Monte Carlo simulations using population-PK parameters of infected/healthy subjects. In infected subjects, 3 g FDC/24 h can treat bacteria with MIC ≤8 µg/mL, while for MIC 8-32 µg/mL, 3 g FDC/12 h is recommended. Lastly, the developed population-PK model was successfully used to predict drug exposure in pediatric population.