Prevalence and quality of informed consent for patients undergoing cosmetic procedures: a cross sectional study / Prevalencia y calidad del consentimiento informado de los pacientes sometidos a procedimientos estéticos: un estudio transversa / Prevalência e qualidade de consentimento informado para pacientes submetendo-se a procedimentos cosméticos: um estudo transversal

Abstract: Background: Failure of the physician to disclose potential risks and benefits associated with cosmetic procedures is one of the main causes of legal disputes over informed consent. The objective was to assess the prevalence and quality of the informed consent given by patients who undergone cosmetic procedures and its association with post-procedure adverse events. Methods: It was a cross-sectional, online, questionnaire-based study conducted during September and October 2020. Eligible adult male and female patients who were attending a governmental dermatology clinic at Al-Kharj city (Saudi Arabia) were invited to join the study. Results: A total of 246 patients were included in the study. Out of 246, 111 (45.1%) patients performed at least one cosmetic procedure before, and 89 (80.2%) of them signed an informed consent. 62 (69.7%) of them signed a consent before the procedure, 17 (19.1%) reported post-procedure adverse events, 16 (18.0%) reported dissatisfactions, and 27 (30.3%) reported either. None of the consent characteristics were significantly associated with higher prevalence of post-procedure adverse events or non-satisfactions. Conclusions: The prevalence and the quality of informed consent before cosmetic procedures are inadequate. Urgent corrections are required to protect the patient's rights and to legally protect the treating physician.

Resumen: Antecedentes: El hecho de que el médico no revele los posibles riesgos y beneficios asociados a los procedimientos estéticos es una de las principales causas de las disputas legales sobre el consentimiento informado. El objetivo fue evaluar la prevalencia y la calidad del consentimiento informado dado por los pacientes sometidos a procedimientos estéticos y su asociación con los eventos adversos posteriores al procedimiento. Métodos: Fue un estudio transversal, online, basado en un cuestionario, realizado durante septiembre y octubre de 2020. Se invitó a participar en el estudio a pacientes adultos de ambos sexos que acudían a una clínica dermatológica gubernamental en la ciudad de Al-Kharj (Arabia Saudí). Resultados: Un total de 246 pacientes fueron incluidos en el estudio. De los 246, 111 (45,1%) pacientes se habían sometido al menos a un procedimiento cosmético antes, y 89 (80,2%) de ellos firmaron un consentimiento informado. 62 (69,7%) de ellos firmaron un consentimiento antes del procedimiento, 17 (19,1%) informaron de acontecimientos adversos posteriores al procedimiento, 16 (18,0%) informaron de insatisfacciones y 27 (30,3%) informaron de cualquiera de los dos. Ninguna de las características del consentimiento se asoció significativamente con una mayor prevalencia de acontecimientos adversos posteriores al procedimiento o insatisfacciones. Conclusiones: La prevalencia y la calidad del consentimiento informado antes de los procedimientos cosméticos son inadecuadas. Se requieren correcciones urgentes para proteger los derechos del paciente y proteger legalmente al médico tratante.

Resumo: Contexto: A falha do médico em comunicar os potenciais riscos e benefícios associados a procedimentos cosméticos é uma das principais causas de disputas legais sobre consentimento informado. O objetivo foi avaliar a prevalência e qualidade do consentimento informado dado a pacientes que sofreram procedimentos cosméticos e sua associação com eventos adversos pós-procedimento. Métodos: Estudo transversal, online, baseado em questionário, realizado durante setembro e outubro de 2020. Pacientes homens e mulheres, adultos elegíveis, de uma clínica dermatológica governamental da cidade de Al-Kharj (Arábia Saudita) foram convidados a participar do estudo. Resultados: Um total de 246 pacientes foram incluídos no estudo. Dos 246, 111 (45.1%) pacientes realizaram pelo menos um procedimento cosmético anterior e 89 (80.2%) deles assinaram um consentimento informado. 62 (69.7%) deles assinaram um consentimento antes do procedimento, 17 (19.1%) relataram eventos adversos pós-procedimento, 16 (18.0%) relataram insatisfações e 27 (30.3%) relataram ambos. Nenhuma das características do consentimento foram significativamente associadas com mais alta prevalência de eventos adversos pós-procedimento ou não satisfação. Conclusões: A prevalência e a qualidade do consentimento informado antes de procedimentos cosméticos são inadequados. Correções urgentes são requeridas para proteger os direitos dos pacientes e para legalmente proteger o médico responsável.

Stem cells in aesthetic dermatology: bioethical and professional obligations.

Recently, stem cells in aesthetics have attracted increased attention, especially as they have become a popular trend that is being mass-marketed to consumers on the Internet and social media. Unfortunately, studies have shown this marketing to be misleading as it portrays many purported benefits of stem cells that have yet to be proven in the limited studies that are available. It is important for clinicians to understand the evidence and marketing behind any new trends, especially in the fast-paced world of aesthetics, where treatments often outpace current medical understanding. As clinicians, we have bioethical and professional obligations to educate ourselves on current trends, ensure adequate patient safety, and advocate for continued consumer education.

Ethical Challenges With Nonsurgical Medical Aesthetic Devices.

The medical device industry is an incredibly profitable and rapidly growing sector of health care. In plastic surgery, the nonsurgical medical aesthetic device industry presents ongoing ethical challenges, specifically related to the principles of nonmaleficence and respect for autonomy. The purpose of this article is to increase awareness of the ethical challenges the nonsurgical medical aesthetic device industry presents, including use of deceptive or misleading language in advertising, limited evidence of efficacy, and lack of public and professional understanding of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulation of medical devices. Practical application of ethics is presented through the lens of the Code of Ethics for Nurses With Interpretive Statements () and the Code of Ethics of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery ().

The Public's Preferences on Plastic Surgery Social Media Engagement and Professionalism: Demystifying the Impact of Demographics.

BACKGROUND: Social media discussions are alive among plastic surgeons. This article represents a primer on beginning to understand how the public would seek out plastic surgeons and how demographics shape their preferences. METHODS: An anonymous 31-question survey was crowdsourced by means of MTurk. RESULTS: There were a total of 527 respondents. Of these respondents, 33 percent follow plastic surgeons on social media, with those aged younger than 35 years 3.9 times more likely to do so. Google was the first place people would look for a plastic surgeon (46 percent). When asked what was the most influential of all online methods for selecting a surgeon, practice website ranked first (25 percent), but social media platforms ranked higher as a whole (35 percent). Those considering surgical or noninvasive procedures are thee times more likely to select social media platforms as the most influential online method in selecting a surgeon and five times more likely to follow a plastic surgeon on social media. The majority would prefer not seeing the surgeon's private life displayed on social media (39 percent). Respondents were evenly split regarding whether graphic surgical images would lead them to unfollow accounts. Ninety-six percent of the general public were unclear of the type of board certification a plastic surgeon should hold. CONCLUSIONS: Clear differences in engagement and perception exist in the public based on age, sex, parental status, and reported country of origin. Social media will soon become a critical strategy in outreach and engagement and a valuable tool in clearing misconceptions within plastic surgery.

Ethics and/or Aesthetics? Reflections on Cosmetic Surgery for Adolescents.

Cosmetic surgery entails various ethical issues, even more so in cases involving adolescent patients. Cosmetic surgeons need to take into account how modern societies consider physical appearance an essential component of everyday life, as well as the vulnerability of youths and adolescents. For that reason, it is imperative to thoroughly assess the psychological and emotional states, in addition to the motivations, of minor patients. That goal can be achieved through the use of the DAS-59, (the Derriford Appearance Scale)1 , an effective and dependable tool devised to evaluate the psychological difficulties and distress experienced by people living with problems of appearance. Prior to undergoing cosmetic surgery procedures, adolescents should be required to go through adequate counseling, over multiple sessions and extended to their family members as well, on account of the complex issues inherent in evaluating the risk-benefit ratio and a prospective patient's decision-making capability. A concerted effort on the part of surgeons, psychiatrists or psychologists is key in determining the real motivations behind a minor's decision to opt for cosmetic surgery in the first place. Possible psychiatric conditions may in fact prevent a minor from making a free, informed decision. From an ethical standpoint, cosmetic surgery procedures should be geared to serve the best interest of the minor patient, who may experience distress over his or her body image, from a health and psychological balance perspective and improve his or her social, affective and working life. Besides, cosmetic surgery should not be overly invasive compared to its potential benefits. Those procedures aimed at achieving ″ideal beauty″ are not desirable and ought to be banned. By virtue of such criteria, the authors have set out to evaluate the ethical admissibility of some aesthetic treatments. Thus, doctors should not consent to any request coming from their patients, but rather, intervene only in presence of an objective physical flaw or deformity, e.g. protruding ears, which have a potential to negatively affect social life and interactions.

Counterfeit esthetic devices and patient safety in dermatology.

This study addresses the dilemma concerned with meeting patients who may have encountered counterfeit esthetic devices in the marketplace. Over the past several years, we have witnessed a rise in counterfeit injectables and medical devices in our field. Often times, the procedures are marketed to patients at significantly reduced prices compared to competitors. Patients may be unaware that counterfeit devices exist and may unknowingly have procedures completed using untested and uncertified devices. It is important for clinicians to recognize when their patients may be encountering counterfeit devices, know what to do in this situation, and offer the best recommendations.

[Treatment of the human body : the possibilities and limits of plastic surgery]. / Die Bearbeitung des menschlichen Körpers : Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der plastischen Chirurgie.

The desire for authenticity is often cited as a motive for making use of plastic surgery. This article aims to elaborate on the meaning of this particular authenticity. At the same time, it discusses reasons that justify or forbid a plastic surgery intervention in the light of ethics. For this purpose, a distinction is made between "objective body" (Körper) and "subjective body" (Leib), and the objectives of medical actions are questioned. Through the terminological differentiation between integrity (Integrität), prosperity (Wohlergehen), and well-being (Wohlbefinden), these objectives are qualified and the limits of medical actions are determined.

Medical ethical standards in dermatology: an analytical study of knowledge, attitudes and practices.

BACKGROUND: Dermatology practice has not been ethically justified at all times. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to find out dermatologists' knowledge about medical ethics, their attitudes towards regulatory measures and their practices, and to study the different factors influencing the knowledge, the attitude and the practices of dermatologists. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional comparative study conducted among 214 dermatologists, from five Academic Universities and from participants in two conferences. A 54 items structured anonymous questionnaire was designed to describe the demographical characteristics of the study group as well as their knowledge, attitude and practices regarding the medical ethics standards in clinical and research settings. Five scoring indices were estimated regarding knowledge, attitude and practice. Inferential statistics were used to test differences between groups as indicated. The Student's t-test and analysis of variance were carried out for quantitative variables. The chi-squared test was conducted for qualitative variables. The results were considered statistically significant at a P > 0.05. RESULTS: Analysis of the possible factors having impact on the overall scores revealed that the highest knowledge scores were among dermatologists who practice in an academic setting plus an additional place; however, this difference was statistically non-significant (P = 0.060). Female dermatologists showed a higher attitude score compared to males (P = 0.028). The highest significant attitude score (P = 0.019) regarding clinical practice was recorded among those practicing cosmetic dermatology. The different studied groups of dermatologists revealed a significant impact on the attitude score (P = 0.049), and the evidence-practice score (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Ethical practices will improve the quality and integrity of dermatology research.

The Ethics of Stem Cell-Based Aesthetic Surgery: Attitudes and Perceptions of the Plastic Surgery Community.

BACKGROUND: The emerging field of stem cell-based aesthetics has raised ethical concerns related to advertising campaigns and standards for safety and efficacy. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to characterize the attitudes of plastic surgeons regarding the ethics of stem cell-based aesthetics. METHODS: A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to 4592 members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Statements addressed ethical concerns about informed consent, conflicts of interest, advertising, regulation, and stem cell tourism. An agreement score (AS) from 0 to 100 was calculated for each statement. Majority agreement was designated as ≥60 and majority disagreement as ≤40. RESULTS: A total of 770 questionnaires were received (16.7%). The majority of respondents indicated that knowledge regarding the risks and benefits of stem cell procedures is insufficient to obtain valid informed consent (AS, 29) and that direct-to-consumer advertising for these technologies is inappropriate and unethical (AS, 23). Most respondents reported that patients should be actively warned against traveling abroad to receive aesthetic cell therapies (AS, 86) and that registries and evaluations of these clinics should be made publicly available (AS, 71). Even more respondents noted that financial conflicts of interest should be disclosed to patients (AS, 96) and that professional societies should participate in establishing regulatory standards (AS, 93). CONCLUSIONS: The plastic surgeons surveyed in this study support a well-regulated, evidence-based approach to aesthetic procedures involving stem cells.

Cosmetic neurology: the role of healthcare professionals.

In an age of modern technology and an increasing movement towards a 24-h working culture, life for many is becoming more stressful and demanding. To help juggle these work commitments and an active social life, nootropic medication, (the so-called 'smart pills') have become a growing part of some people's lives. Users claim that these drugs allow them to reach their maximal potential by becoming more efficient, smarter and requiring less sleep. The use of these medications and the role of health professionals in their distribution raises many ethical questions.

Wish-fulfilling medicine in practice: the opinions and arguments of lay people.

BACKGROUND: Wish-fulfilling medicine appears to be on the rise. It can be defined as 'doctors and other health professionals using medical means (medical technology, drugs, and so on) in a medical setting to fulfil the explicitly stated, prima facie non-medical wish of a patient'. Some instances of wish fulfilling medicine can be understood as 'human enhancements'. AIM: The aim of this study is to map the normative opinions and arguments of lay people about wish-fulfilling medicine. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with lay people (five focus groups). We asked their opinions about five cases and the arguments for these opinions. Furthermore, we enquired about the role of the medical profession and the treating physician, and whether the participants saw a role for the government. RESULTS: The opinions and arguments used varied according to the example discussed. For instance, increased familiarity with a procedure like breast enhancement seems to garner more acceptance for that procedure, whereas completely new examples were considered less acceptable. Various different arguments were raised in focus groups; these included: people should be allowed to make up their own minds about this (autonomy); payment of the treatment; and concerns about risks. DISCUSSION: An ethical analysis of the emerging practice of wish-fulfilling medicine should take the normative views of all parties involved into account. Thus, it is important to establish what lay people think about wish-fulfilling medicine and in particular their arguments.