Impact of the extent of low-voltage zone on outcomes after voltage-based catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Low-voltage zones (LVZs), as measured by electroanatomic mapping, are thought to be associated with fibrosis. We reported the efficacy of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation aiming to homogenize left atrial (LA) LVZ. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of LVZ extension outcomes after LVZ homogenization in patients with nonparoxysmal AF. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study included 172 patients with nonparoxysmal AF undergoing their initial ablation. LVZ was defined as an area with bipolar electrograms <0.5mV during sinus rhythm. LVZ extent was calculated as the percentage of LA surface area, and subsequently, LVZ was categorized into stages I (<5%), II (≥5% to <20%), III (≥20% to <30%), and IV (≥30%). Patients with LVZs underwent LVZ ablation aimed at homogenization of ≥80% of LVZs following pulmonary vein isolation. The primary endpoint was atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence-free survival after a single procedure at 18 months off antiarrhythmic drugs. The association of %LVZ with recurrence-free survival was examined using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: The survival rates were 76%, 74%, 57%, and 28% in patients with stages I, II, III, and IV LVZ, respectively. The difference was significant between stages I and IV (log-rank, p<0.001), while not significant between stages I vs. II and I vs. III (p=0.843, p=0.073, respectively). Cox proportional hazard model revealed that %LVZ was an independent predictor of recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.025 per 1% increase, p<0.001; unadjusted model). The results were similar after demographic and clinical covariate adjustments and after excluding 12 patients who did not achieve homogenization of ≥80% of LVZ. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of LVZ is an independent predictor for recurrence even after LVZ homogenization.

Mortality and Cerebrovascular Events After Heart Rhythm Disorder Management Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Recognition of rates and causes of hard, patient-centered outcomes of death and cerebrovascular events (CVEs) after heart rhythm disorder management (HRDM) procedures is an essential step for the development of quality improvement programs in electrophysiology laboratories. Our primary aim was to assess and characterize death and CVEs (stroke or transient ischemic attack) after HRDM procedures over a 17-year period. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing HRDM procedures between January 2000 and November 2016 at the Mayo Clinic. Patients from all 3 tertiary academic centers (Rochester, Phoenix, and Jacksonville) were included in the study. All in-hospital deaths and CVEs after HRDM procedures were identified and were further characterized as directly or indirectly related to the HRDM procedure. Subgroup analysis of death and CVE rates was performed for ablation, device implantation, electrophysiology study, lead extraction, and defibrillation threshold testing procedures. RESULTS: A total of 48 913 patients (age, 65.7±6.6 years; 64% male) who underwent a total of 62 065 HRDM procedures were included in the study. The overall mortality and CVE rates in the cohort were 0.36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.42) and 0.12% (95% CI, 0.09-0.16), respectively. Patients undergoing lead extraction had the highest overall mortality rate at 1.9% (95% CI, 1.34-2.61) and CVE rate at 0.62% (95% CI, 0.32-1.07). Among patients undergoing HRDM procedures, 48% of deaths directly related to the HDRM procedure were among patients undergoing device implantation procedures. Overall, cardiac tamponade was the most frequent direct cause of death (40%), and infection was the most common indirect cause of death (29%). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 0.76%, with the highest being in lead extraction procedures (3.08%), followed by device implantation procedures (0.94%). CONCLUSIONS: Half of the deaths directly related to an HRDM procedure were among the patients undergoing device implantation procedures, with cardiac tamponade being the most common cause of death. This highlights the importance of the development of protocols for the quick identification and management of cardiac tamponade even in procedures typically believed to be lower risk such as device implantation.

Utility and Safety of Combined Interventional Catheterization and Electrophysiology Procedures in a Children's Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Interventional cardiac catheterization (cath) and electrophysiology (EP) procedures are not routinely performed together. There are several perceived barriers affecting this practice, though there are also advantages for both the patient and practitioner to a combined approach. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study reviewing combined cath and EP procedures with a preprocedural intention to intervene at Texas Children's Hospital from 2001 to 2014. We excluded procedures in which the intended procedure was purely diagnostic in nature. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients requiring 125 procedures were identified, of which 61 patients underwent 62 procedures that met our inclusion criteria. Potential subgroups of interest included adult congenital heart disease patients (26% of cohort), single ventricle anatomy (34%), and heterotaxy (19%) and collectively 58% of procedures involved a patient in one of these groups. The combined nature of the procedure did not preclude a cath or EP intervention in any patient. There were no mortalities. There were three adverse events, affecting 4.8% of procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Combined interventional cardiac cath and EP procedures in pediatric patients and those with congenital heart disease can be performed safely in a high-volume center. These combined procedures save patients the risk and inconvenience of multiple procedures, and further investigation into cost savings is warranted.

Major complications and mortality within 30 days of an electrophysiological procedure at an academic medical center: implications for developing national standards.

BACKGROUND: Despite growing attention to performance and quality measures, national standards for reporting of outcomes after all electrophysiology (EP) procedures have not yet been developed. We sought to characterize the incidence and timing of adverse events up to 30 days after EP procedures at a tertiary academic medical center. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively followed all patients undergoing EP procedures between January 2010 and September 2012. All were followed for 30 days postprocedure either in clinic or by telephone. Major complications were defined as events related to the procedure that led to prolongation of hospital stay or readmission, required additional procedural intervention, or resulted in death or significant injury. These were further categorized as intraprocedure, postprocedure, or postdischarge events. Seven EP physicians collectively adjudicated whether complications were directly related to the procedure. A total of 3,213 procedures were performed. Major complications occurred in 2.2% of patients; 49% of these events occurred after discharge. Death occurred in 0.6% of patients; 73% of these deaths were found to be secondary to worsening of the patient's underlying comorbid conditions and unrelated to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: When considering national standards for reporting outcomes of all EP procedures, continued follow-up after discharge is important. In our cohort, half of major complications occurring within 30 days occurred after discharge. In addition, three-quarters of deaths within 30 days were not directly related to the procedure and caution should be used in using all-cause mortality as an outcome measure for EP procedures.

Does isolation of the left atrial posterior wall improve clinical outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation?: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Although posterior wall of left atrium (LA) is known to be arrhythmogenic focus, little is known about the effect of posterior wall isolation (PWI) in patients who undergo radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). METHODS: We randomly assigned 120 consecutive PeAF patients to additional PWI [PWI (+), n=60] or control [PWI (-), n=60] groups. In all patients, linear ablation was performed after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Linear lesions included roof, anterior perimitral, and cavotricuspid isthmus lines with conduction block. In PWI (+) group, posterior inferior linear lesion was also conducted. Creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and troponin-T levels were measured 1day after RFCA. LA emptying fraction (LAEF) was assessed before and 12 months after RFCA. RESULTS: A total of 120 subjects were followed for 12 months after RFCA. There were no significant differences between two groups in baseline demographics and LA volume (LAV). The levels of CK-MB and troponin-T and procedure time were not significantly different between the groups. AF termination during RFCA was more frequently observed in PWI (+) than control (P=0.035). During follow-up period, recurrence occurred in 10 (16.7%) patients in PWI (+) and 22 (36.7%) in control (P=0.02). The change in LAEF was not significantly different between the groups. On multivariate analysis, smaller LAV and additional PWI were independently associated with procedure outcome. CONCLUSIONS: PWI in addition to PVI plus linear lesions was an efficient strategy without deterioration of LA pump function in patients who underwent RFCA for PeAF.

Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of periprocedural cerebrovascular accidents during electrophysiologic procedures.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of periprocedural cerebrovascular accident (PCVA) during electrophysiologic (EP) procedures. BACKGROUND: Periprocedural cerebrovascular accident is one of the most feared complications during EP procedures with very few data regarding its characteristics, management, and outcomes. METHODS: Between January 1998 and December 2008, we reviewed 30,032 invasive EP procedures for PCVA occurrence and characteristics. Management and outcomes were also determined. RESULTS: Thirty-eight CVAs were identified. Twenty (53 %) were intraprocedural and 18 (47 %) postprocedural. Thirty-two (84 %) were classified as strokes and six (16 %) as transient ischemic attacks. All CVAs except one (37, 97 %) were ischemic and the vast majority occurred during ablation procedures (36, 95 %). Among the 31 patients with ischemic stroke, 11 (35 %) were treated with reperfusion (eight catheter-based therapy and three intravenous t-PA) of whom five (46 %) had complete recovery, three (27 %) had partial recovery, and three (27 %) had no recovery. No hemorrhagic transformations occurred. CONCLUSION: Periprocedural cerebrovascular accident during EP procedures is rare and is almost always ischemic. It occurs more frequently during ablation procedures. Reperfusion therapy is feasible and safe.

Acute complications of electrophysiology and pacing procedures: identification and management.

Non-pharmacologic interventional techniques for treatment and management of almost all cardiac arrhythmias have greatly expanded over the past decade. These newer interventional electrophysiologic techniques continue to demonstrate increasing success at achieving their targeted goals, and enhancing the patient's quality of life. However, like all interventional procedures, complications may result. In this article we provide the reader with an overview of the more common and significant adverse events that may follow electrophysiologic and pacing procedures, and how best to recognize and manage these complications. After providing the reader with an overview of the complications inherent to all electrophysiologic procedures, we will detail the adverse events intrinsic to specific therapeutic electrophysiologic interventions (DC cardioversion, pharmacologic-based cardioversion, antitachycardia pacing, and ablation of specific arrhythmias). In the last part of the review, we will delineate complications associated with pacing procedures (pacemaker and defibrillator implantation, biventricular pacing and pacing lead extraction).

Pulseless electrical activity and unsuccessful out-of-hospital resuscitation: what is the cause of death?

AIMS: To study the cause of deaths after witnessed cardiac arrest followed by pulseless electrical activity and unsuccessful of out-of-hospital resuscitation; and to detect any differences between causes of death determined at autopsy and those inferred from clinical history. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, data were collected from 91 individuals treated by the emergency medical services in three urban communities in southern Finland. RESULTS: Cause of death was determined at autopsy in 59 cases and without autopsy in 32 cases. There were significantly more diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction and fewer of pulmonary embolism and aortic dissection and rupture among cases without autopsy compared with those followed by autopsy. CONCLUSION: In unsuccessful resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity as initial rhythm, an autopsy should be performed to determine the correct cause of death.

Role of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with Brugada syndrome: a meta-analysis of worldwide published data.

AIMS: Brugada syndrome (BS) is an ion channelopathy with the risk of sudden cardiac death. The role of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in risk stratification has been controversially discussed. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis on the prognostic role of PVS in BS. METHODS AND RESULTS: A Medline search until July 2006 documented 822 entries for BS. Only English publications with > 10 patients and a follow-up period were considered (n = 15). Patients [n = 1217; 974 males (80%)] were divided into three groups: survived sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) [n = 222 (18%)], syncope (Syncope) [n = 275 (23%)], and asymptomatic patients (Asympt) [n = 720 (59%)]. PVS was conducted in 1036 patients (85%). In 548 patients (53%), sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was inducible. During follow-up (34 +/- 40 months), VT/VF occurred in 141 patients. SCA bore the highest chance for a VT/VF occurrence during follow-up [odds ratio (OR) 14.4 compared with asymptomatic patients; P < 0.0005]. However, except for one study, the OR for VT/VF during follow-up in relation to VT/VF inducibility was non-significant (OR 1.5; P = ns). CONCLUSION: The main finding is that we were unable to identify a significant role of PVS with regard to arrhythmic events during follow-up in BS, thus questioning the role of PVS for risk stratification in patients with BS. Patients with BS and survived SCA show the highest chance for VT/VF occurrence during follow-up.

Pulseless electrical activity with witnessed arrest as a predictor of sudden death from massive pulmonary embolism in outpatients.

BACKGROUND: the objective was to determine clinical characteristics that can quickly distinguish sudden death from massive pulmonary embolism (MPE) from other causes of sudden death. METHODS AND RESULTS: all medical examiner reports from Charlotte, NC from 1992 to 1999 (n=4926) were hand-searched for cases of sudden death which met the inclusion criteria: non-traumatic death, age 18-65 years, transported to an emergency department (ED), and autopsy performed. Supplemental data from ED and prehospital records were retrieved to complete documentation. Data were analyzed by univariate odds ratios (OR) followed by chi-square (chi(2)) recursive partitioning for decision tree construction. Three hundred eighty four cases met inclusion criteria; MPE was the second most frequent cause of cardiac arrest in this cohort (37/384, 9.6%). The mean age of subjects with MPE (40.2+/-11.1 years) was significantly lower compared with non-PE subjects (46.5+/-9.9 years). Pulseless electrical activity was observed as the initial arrest rhythm (primary PEA) in 52/384 (13.5%) subjects. Out of 52 subjects with primary PEA, 28 (53%) died from MPE. Odds ratio data indicated significant association of MPE with female gender, arrest witnessed by medical providers, presence of primary PEA, and return of spontaneous circulation. The most accurate decision rule to recognize MPE consisted of witnessed arrest+primary PEA. This rule generated sensitivity=67.6% and specificity=94.5% and yielded a posttest probability of MPE of 57%. CONCLUSIONS: outpatients with witnessed cardiac arrest and primary PEA carry a high probability of MPE.