Blood pressure increases are associated with weight gain and not antiretroviral regimen or kidney function: a secondary analysis from the ADVANCE trial in South Africa.

INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence has raised questions about whether newer HIV treatment regimens, including dolutegravir (DTG) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), are associated with increases in blood pressure (BP). METHODS: We assessed changes in BP by treatment regimen and evaluated the relative contribution of kidney function and weight gain to these changes among participants in the ADVANCE phase-3 trial clinical trial in South Africa (study dates: January 2017-February 2022). Our primary outcome of interest was a change in systolic BP (SBP) at 96 and 192 weeks, among those not receiving antihypertensive medication. The secondary outcome was treatment-emergent hypertension at these same time points, defined as BP ≥140/90 mmHg on two occasions, or initiation of antihypertensive medication after week 4 among individuals without hypertension at enrolment. We used linear regression to evaluate the relationship between change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and change in SBP; and Poisson regression to evaluate the relationship between change in eGFR and treatment-emergent hypertension at each time point. All models were adjusted for age, sex, treatment group and change in body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: Over 96 weeks, the average changes in SBP were 1.7 mmHg (95% CI: 0.0-3.4), -0.5 mmHg (95% CI: -2.2 to 1.7) and -2.1 mmHg (95% CI: -3.8 to 0.4) in the TAF/emtricitabine (FTC)/DTG, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/FTC/DTG and TDF/FTC/efavirenz (EFV) groups, respectively. This difference was significant for the TAF/FTC/DTG compared to the TDF/FTC/EFV group (p = 0.002). Over 96 weeks, 18.2% (95% CI: 13.4-22.9), 15.4% (95% CI: 11.0-19.9) and 13.3% (95% CI: 8.9-17.6) of participants developed treatment-emergent hypertension, respectively. In adjusted models, there was no significant relationship between change in eGFR and either outcome. Change in BMI was significantly associated with an increase in SBP, while age was associated with an increased risk of treatment-emergent hypertension. Adjustment for BMI also mitigated the unadjusted relationship between HIV treatment regimen and SBP where present. CONCLUSIONS: In the ADVANCE cohort, weight gain and age accounted for increases in BP and risk of treatment-emergent hypertension. HIV treatment programmes may need to integrate the management of obesity and hypertension into routine care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03122262.

Kidney outcomes with SGLT2is for type 2 diabetes patients: does background treatment with metformin or RASis matter?

Introduction: There is a lack of real-world evidence regarding the impact of concomitant metformin and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASis) on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i)-associated kidney outcomes. This study was aimed to investigate whether SGLT2i-associated kidney outcomes were modified by the concomitant use of metformin or RASis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: SGLT2i users were identified from three electronic health record databases during May 2016 and December 2017 and categorized into those with and without concomitant use of metformin or RASis. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize baseline differences between groups. Study outcomes were mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change and time to 30%, 40%, and 50% eGFR reductions. A meta-analysis was performed to combine the estimates across databases. Results: After matching, there were 6,625 and 3,260 SGLT2i users with and without metformin, and 6,654 and 2,746 SGLT2i users with and without RASis, respectively. The eGFR dip was similar in SGLT2i users with and without metformin therapy, but was greater in SGLT2i users with RASis compared to those without RASis. Neither metformin nor RASi use had a significant effect on SGLT2i-associated eGFR reductions, as evidenced by the hazard ratios (95% CIs) of 30% eGFR reductions for SGLT2is with versus without metformin/RASis, namely 1.02 (0.87-1.20)/1.09 (0.92-1.31). Such findings were also observed in the outcomes of 40% and 50% eGFR reductions. Conclusion: Using metformin or RASis did not modify SGLT2i-associated kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes.

Long-term comparison of renal and metabolic outcomes after sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy in type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes following treatment with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) have not been directly compared. This study compared the impact of SGLT2i and GLP1RA therapy on renal function and metabolic parameters. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated SGLT2i or GLP1RA therapy in a tertiary hospital between January 2009 and August 2023 were included to assess composite renal outcomes, such as a 40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), onset of end-stage renal disease, renal death, or new-onset macroalbuminuria. Alterations in blood pressure, glucose regulation parameters, lipid profile, and anthropometric parameters, including body fat and muscle masses, were examined over 4-years. RESULTS: A total of 2,112 patients were enrolled using a one-to-three propensity-score matching approach (528 patients for GLP1RAs, 1,584 patients for SGLT2i). SGLT2i treatment was favoured over GLP1RA treatment, though not significantly, for composite renal outcomes (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; p = 0.097). SGLT2i therapy preserved renal function effectively than GLP1RAs (decrease in eGFR, ≥ 40%; HR, 0.46; p = 0.023), with improving albuminuria regression (HR, 1.72; p = 0.036). SGLT2i therapy decreased blood pressure and body weight to a greater extent. However, more patients attained HbA1c levels < 7.0% with GLP1RAs than with SGLT2is (40.6% vs 31.4%; p < 0.001). GLP1RA therapy enhanced ß-cell function and decreased LDL-cholesterol levels below baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2is were superior for preserving renal function and reducing body weight, whereas GLP1RAs were better for managing glucose dysregulation and dyslipidaemia.

Air quality and kidney health: Assessing the effects of PM10, PM2.5, CO, and NO2 on renal function in primary glomerulonephritis.

BACKGROUND: While extensive studies have elucidated the relationships between exposure to air pollution and chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disorders and diabetes, the intricate effects on specific kidney diseases, notably primary glomerulonephritis (GN)-an immune-mediated kidney ailment-are less well understood. Considering the escalating incidence of GN and conspicuous lack of investigative focus on its association with air quality, investigation is dedicated to examining the long-term effects of air pollutants on renal function in individuals diagnosed with primary GN. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 1394 primary GN patients who were diagnosed at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul National University Hospital. Utilizing time-varying Cox regression and linear mixed models (LMM), we examined the effect of yearly average air pollution levels on renal function deterioration (RFD) and change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In this context, RFD is defined as sustained eGFR of less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. RESULTS: During a mean observation period of 5.1 years, 350 participants developed RFD. Significantly, elevated interquartile range (IQR) levels of air pollutants-including PM10 (particles ≤10 micrometers, HR 1.389, 95 % CI 1.2-1.606), PM2.5 (particles ≤2.5 micrometers, HR 1.353, 95 % CI 1.162-1.575), CO (carbon monoxide, HR 1.264, 95 % CI 1.102-1.451), and NO2 (nitrogen dioxide, HR 1.179, 95 % CI 1.021-1.361)-were significantly associated with an increased risk of RFD, after factoring in demographic and health variables. Moreover, exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 was associated with decreased eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a substantial link between air pollution exposure and renal function impairment in primary GN, accentuating the significance of environmental determinants in the pathology of immune-mediated kidney diseases.

Switching to tenofovir alafenamide in patients with virologically suppressed chronic hepatitis B and renal or hepatic impairment: final week 96 results from an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Phase 3 studies in patients with chronic hepatitis B have shown tenofovir alafenamide to have non-inferior efficacy to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, with improved renal and bone safety. We conducted this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching to tenofovir alafenamide in participants with chronic hepatitis B and renal or hepatic impairment. METHODS: This open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study was done in eight countries or territories at 30 sites. We recruited adults (≥18 years) with chronic hepatitis B who were virally suppressed on nucleoside or nucleotide analogues and had renal impairment (part A: moderate or severe in cohort 1 [estimated glomerular filtration rate by the Cockcroft-Gault formula (eGFRCG) 15-59 mL/min] or end-stage renal disease [eGFRCG <15 mL/min] on haemodialysis in cohort 2) or hepatic impairment including decompensation (part B: Child-Turcotte-Pugh score 7-12). Participants switched to 25 mg of tenofovir alafenamide given orally once daily for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with viral suppression (HBV DNA <20 IU/mL) at week 24 by missing-equals-failure analysis. Efficacy (full analysis set) and safety (safety analysis set) analyses included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Week 96 safety was assessed, including renal and bone parameters. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03180619, and is completed. FINDINGS: 124 participants (93 in part A [78 in cohort 1 and 15 in cohort 2] and 31 in part B) were enrolled between Aug 11, 2017, and Oct 17, 2018, and included in the full and safety analysis sets. 106 (85%) participants completed the study. There were 69 (74%) men and 24 (26%) women in part A and 21 (68%) men and ten (32%) women in part B. At week 24, 91 (97·8%, 95% CI 92·4 to 99·7) of 93 individuals in part A (76 [97·4%, 91·0 to 99·7] of 78 in cohort 1 and 15 [100·0%, 78·2 to 100·0] of 15 in cohort 2) and 31 (100·0%, 88·8 to 100·0) in part B had HBV DNA of less than 20 IU/mL. By week 96, the most common adverse event was upper respiratory tract infection, which occurred in 14 (15%) participants in part A and in six (19%) participants in part B. Serious adverse events occurred in 20 (22%) part A participants and in ten (32%) part B participants; none were related to treatment. No treatment-related deaths occurred. At week 96, median change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (Cockcroft-Gault method) was 1·0 mL/min (IQR -2·8 to 4·5) in cohort 1 and -2·4 mL/min (-11·4 to 10·7) in part B. Mean changes in spine and hip bone mineral density were 1·02% (SD 4·44) and 0·20% (3·25) in part A and -0·25% (3·91) and 0·28% (3·25) in part B. INTERPRETATION: Tenofovir alafenamide might offer continued antiviral efficacy and a favourable safety profile for patients with renal or hepatic impairment and chronic hepatitis B switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or other antivirals. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Metformin for preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Metformin has been used in the management of diabetes for decades. It is an effective, low-cost intervention with a well-established safety profile. Emerging evidence suggests that metformin targets a number of pathways that lead to chronic kidney damage, and long-term use may, therefore, slow the rate of kidney function decline and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of metformin therapy on kidney function decline in patients with CKD with or without diabetes mellitus and assess the safety and dose tolerability in this population. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 19 July 2023 with assistance from an Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that reported kidney-related outcomes with a minimum duration of 12 months delivery of the metformin intervention and whose eligibility criteria included adult participants with either i) a diagnosis of CKD of any aetiology and/or ii) those with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Comparisons included placebo, no intervention, non-pharmacological interventions, other antidiabetic medications or any other active control. Studies that included patients on any modality of kidney replacement therapy were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently carried out data extraction using a standard data extraction form. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: This review included 11 studies reporting on 8449 randomised participants. Studies were conducted in patient populations with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) (four studies) or diabetes mellitus (seven studies). Six studies compared metformin with no active control, four studies compared metformin with active controls (rosiglitazone, glyburide, pioglitazone, or glipizide), and one study included treatment arms that randomised to either metformin, diet and lifestyle modifications, or other antidiabetic therapies. The risk of bias in included studies varied; two studies were abstract-only publications and were judged to have a high risk of bias in most domains. Other included publications were judged to have a low risk of bias in most domains. Across comparisons, GRADE evaluations for most outcomes were judged as low or very low certainty, except for those relating to side effects, tolerance, and withdrawals, which were judged as moderate certainty. The evidence suggests that compared to placebo, metformin may result in i) a slightly smaller decline in kidney function (3 studies, 505 participants: MD 1.92 mL/min, 95% CI 0.33 to 3.51; I2 = 0%; low certainty), ii) very uncertain effects on the incidence of kidney failure (1 study, 753 participants: RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.17 to 8.49), iii) little or no effect on death (3 studies, 865 participants: RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.32; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty), iv) little or no effect on the incidence of serious adverse events (3 studies, 576 participants: RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.72; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty), and v) likely higher incidence of intolerance leading to study withdrawal than placebo (4 studies, 646 participants: RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.46 to 3.27; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty). The certainty of the evidence for proteinuria was very uncertain. Compared to other active controls (rosiglitazone, glyburide, pioglitazone, or glipizide), metformin i) demonstrated very uncertain effects on kidney function decline, ii) may result in little or no difference in death (3 studies, 5608 participants: RR 0.95 95% CI 0.63 to 1.43; I2 = 0%; low certainty), iii) probably results in little or no difference in intolerance leading to study withdrawal (3 studies, 5593 participants: RR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.08; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty), iv) probably results in little or no difference in the incidence of serious adverse events (2 studies, 5545 participants: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.71; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty), and v) may increase the urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (2 studies, 3836 participants: MD 14.61, 95% CI 8.17 to 21.05; I2 = 0%; low certainty). No studies reported the incidence of kidney failure. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the lack of RCTs reporting on the effects of metformin on kidney function, particularly in patients with CKD. Future research in this field requires adequately powered RCTs comparing metformin to placebo or standard care in those with CKD. Seven ongoing studies were identified in this review, and future updates, including their findings, may further inform the results of this review.

Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Finerenone Improves Diastolic Dysfunction in Preclinical Nondiabetic Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: The mineralocorticoid receptor plays a significant role in the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and associated cardiovascular complications. Classic steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are a therapeutic option, but their use in the clinic is limited due to the associated risk of hyperkalemia in patients with CKD. Finerenone is a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that has been recently investigated in 2 large phase III clinical trials (FIDELIO-DKD [Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease] and FIGARO-DKD [Finerenone in Reducing Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease]), showing reductions in kidney and cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We tested whether finerenone improves renal and cardiac function in a preclinical nondiabetic CKD model. Twelve weeks after 5/6 nephrectomy, the rats showed classic signs of CKD characterized by a reduced glomerular filtration rate and increased kidney weight, associated with left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction and decreased LV perfusion. These changes were associated with increased cardiac fibrosis and reduced endothelial nitric oxide synthase activating phosphorylation (ser 1177). Treatment with finerenone prevented LV diastolic dysfunction and increased LV tissue perfusion associated with a reduction in cardiac fibrosis and increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation. Curative treatment with finerenone improves nondiabetic CKD-related LV diastolic function associated with a reduction in cardiac fibrosis and increased cardiac phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase independently from changes in kidney function. Short-term finerenone treatment decreased LV end-diastolic pressure volume relationship and increased phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide synthase activity. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone reduces renal hypertrophy and albuminuria, attenuates cardiac diastolic dysfunction and cardiac fibrosis, and improves cardiac perfusion in a preclinical nondiabetic CKD model.

Efficacy and Safety of Vildagliptin for Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Vildagliptin is one of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors that have been shown to improve hyperglycemia in clinical trials among patients with type 2 diabetes. However, few studies have examined the efficacy of vildagliptin in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight patients with DKD received oral vildagliptin 50-100 mg/day. The duration of diabetes was 6.7±5.9 years and observation period was 23.6±9.8 months. Changes in fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) were studied before and after the administration of vildagliptin. RESULTS: Vildagliptin treatment significantly decreased fasting blood glucose and HbA1c, compared to baseline (132±56 mg/dl, p=0.036, 6.0±0.3, p=0.041, respectively). UPCR tended to be decreased, albeit without statistical significance. However, eGFR was decreased after the administration of vildagliptin. No significant adverse effects were observed in all patients during the study. CONCLUSION: Although the sample size was limited and the observation period was brief, vildagliptin was found to be an effective and reasonably well-tolerated treatment for patients with DKD.

Study on the Effects of Angiotensin Receptor/Neprilysin Inhibitors on Renal Haemodynamics in Healthy Dogs.

An angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), a heart failure treatment, is a combination drug made up of sacubitril, a neprilysin inhibitor, and valsartan, a vascular receptor blocker. No human or veterinary studies regarding the effect of ARNI on renal haemodynamics in the absence of cardiac or renal issues exist. Therefore, we investigated the effect of ARNI on renal haemodynamics in five healthy dogs. ARNI was administered to all five dogs at an oral dose of 20 mg/kg twice daily for 4 weeks. Renal haemodynamics were assessed on the day before ARNI administration (BL), on Day 7, and on Day 28. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) significantly increased on Day 28 compared to BL and Day 7, whereas renal plasma flow increased on Day 7 and Day 28 compared to BL. Systolic blood pressure significantly decreased between BL and Day 28. Plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentrations increased on Day 7 compared to BL. Additionally, ANP concentrations increased on Day 28 in three of the five dogs. Different ANP concentrations were observed in the remaining two dogs. Both urine output volume and heart rate remained relatively stable and did not exhibit significant change. In conclusion, ARNI may enhance renal haemodynamics in healthy dogs. ARNI could be a valuable drug for treating both heart and kidney disease in dogs.

Febuxostat provides renoprotection in patients with hyperuricemia or gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: It is unknown whether febuxostat can delay the progression of kidney dysfunction and reduce kidney endpoint events. The aim was to evaluate the renoprotective effect of febuxostat in patients with hyperuricemia or gout by performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: MEDLINE, Web of science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register for Randomized Controlled Trials were searched. The main outcomes included kidney events (serum creatinine doubling or progression to end-stage kidney disease or dialysis). The secondary outcomes were the rate of change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and changes in the urine protein or urine albumin to creatinine ratio from baseline to the end of follow-up. We used random-effects models to calculate the pooled risk estimates and 95% CIs. RESULTS: A total of 16 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. In comparison with the control group, the patients who received febuxostat showed a reduced risk of kidney events (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.84, p = 0.006) and a slower decline in eGFR (WMD = 0.90 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI 0.31-1.48, p = 0.003). The pooled results also revealed that febuxostat use reduced the urine albumin to creatinine ratio (SMD = -0.21, 95% CI -0.41 to -0.01, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Febuxostat use is associated with a reduced risk of kidney events and a slow decline in eGFR. In addition, the urine albumin to creatinine ratio decreased in febuxostat users. Accordingly, it is an effective drug for delaying the progression of kidney function deterioration in patients with gout.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021272591.

Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease are at high risk for kidney failure, cardiovascular events, and death. Whether treatment with semaglutide would mitigate these risks is unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of 50 to 75 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio [with albumin measured in milligrams and creatinine measured in grams] of >300 and <5000 or an eGFR of 25 to <50 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >100 and <5000) to receive subcutaneous semaglutide at a dose of 1.0 mg weekly or placebo. The primary outcome was major kidney disease events, a composite of the onset of kidney failure (dialysis, transplantation, or an eGFR of <15 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), at least a 50% reduction in the eGFR from baseline, or death from kidney-related or cardiovascular causes. Prespecified confirmatory secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically. RESULTS: Among the 3533 participants who underwent randomization (1767 in the semaglutide group and 1766 in the placebo group), median follow-up was 3.4 years, after early trial cessation was recommended at a prespecified interim analysis. The risk of a primary-outcome event was 24% lower in the semaglutide group than in the placebo group (331 vs. 410 first events; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.88; P = 0.0003). Results were similar for a composite of the kidney-specific components of the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.94) and for death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.89). The results for all confirmatory secondary outcomes favored semaglutide: the mean annual eGFR slope was less steep (indicating a slower decrease) by 1.16 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 in the semaglutide group (P<0.001), the risk of major cardiovascular events 18% lower (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.98; P = 0.029), and the risk of death from any cause 20% lower (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95, P = 0.01). Serious adverse events were reported in a lower percentage of participants in the semaglutide group than in the placebo group (49.6% vs. 53.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Semaglutide reduced the risk of clinically important kidney outcomes and death from cardiovascular causes in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; FLOW ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03819153.).

Protective effect of magnesium preloading on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity: which dose is more suitable?

OBJECTIVE: Cisplatin is a widely used and potent cytotoxic chemotherapy agent, but its nephrotoxicity is a significant limiting side effect. Various premedication approaches have been implemented to preserve renal function, including magnesium (Mg) preloading. However, the optimal Mg dosage is still unknown. Our study aimed to assess the protective effects of different Mg doses as premedication in cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy for patients with local/locally advanced cervical and head-neck cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study involved premedication with saline infusion containing potassium chloride and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) for all patients before cisplatin treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: 12 mEq MgSO4 (low-dose Mg preload group, low-Mg) and 24 mEq MgSO4 (high-dose Mg preload group, high-Mg). Renal function was evaluated using serum creatinine (sCr, mg/dl) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, ml/min). Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Renal outcomes and efficacy were compared between the groups. RESULTS: In the low-Mg group (n = 159), sCr levels were significantly higher compared to baseline, various weeks during treatment, and at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months post-treatment (p < 0.001). In the high-Mg group (n = 128), no significant changes were observed during treatment and at 1st, 3rd, and 12th months post-treatment (p > 0.05). A significant reduction in mean sCr level from baseline to 6 months was noted in the high-Mg group (p < 0.001). eGFR values are generally correlated with sCr levels. AKI occurred in 21 (13.2%) and 22 (17.7%) patients in the low-Mg and high-Mg groups, respectively (p = 0.292). There was no difference in progression-free or overall survival between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: We clearly demonstrated that saline hydration with 24 mEql MgSO4 supplementation before cisplatin treatment has a better renal protective effect than 12 mEql MgSO4 without reducing efficacy, especially in patients with local/local advanced cervical and head-neck cancer receiving cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy.

SGLT2 Inhibitors in Kidney Diseases-A Narrative Review.

Some of the most common conditions affecting people are kidney diseases. Among them, we distinguish chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury. Both entities pose serious health risks, so new drugs are still being sought to treat and prevent them. In recent years, such a role has begun to be assigned to sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. They increase the amount of glucose excreted in the urine. For this reason, they are currently used as a first-line drug in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Due to their demonstrated cardioprotective effect, they are also used in heart failure treatment. As for the renal effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, they reduce intraglomerular pressure and decrease albuminuria. This results in a slower decline in glomelular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with kidney disease. In addition, these drugs have anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects. In the following article, we review the evidence for the effectiveness of this group of drugs in kidney disease and their nephroprotective effect. Further research is still needed, but meta-analyses indicate SGLT2 inhibitors' efficacy in kidney disease, especially the one caused by diabetes. Development of new drugs and clinical trials on specific patient subgroups will further refine their nephroprotective effects.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Patients With Heart Failure and Impaired Renal Function.

BACKGROUND: Kidney dysfunction often leads to reluctance to start or continue life-saving heart failure (HF) therapy. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the efficacy and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction experiencing significant kidney dysfunction. METHODS: We pooled individual patient data from the RALES (Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study) and EMPHASIS-HF (Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure) trials. The association between MRA treatment and outcomes was assessed according to whether the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declined to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or not. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. RESULTS: Among 4,355 patients included, 295 (6.8%) experienced a deterioration of eGFR after randomization to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. These patients had more impaired baseline cardiac and kidney function (eGFR 47.3 ± 13.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs 70.5 ± 21.8 mL/min/1.73 m2) and had a higher risk of the primary outcome than patients without eGFR deterioration (HR: 2.49; 95% CI: 2.01-3.08; P < 0.001). However, the risk reduction in the primary outcome with MRA therapy was similar in those who experienced a decrease in eGFR to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.99) compared with those who did not (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.56-0.71) (Pinteraction = 0.87). In patients with a decrease in eGFR to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, 21 fewer individuals (per 100 person-years) experienced the primary outcome with MRA treatment, vs placebo, compared with an excess of 3 more patients with severe hyperkalemia (>6.0 mmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: Because patients experiencing a decrease in eGFR to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 are at very high risk, the absolute risk reduction with an MRA in these patients is large and this decline in eGFR should not automatically lead to treatment discontinuation.

Add-on astragalus in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: A multi-center, assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes leads to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and kidney failure, requiring dialysis or transplantation. Astragalus, a common herbal medicine and US pharmacopeia-registered food ingredient, is shown kidney protective by retrospective and preclinical data but with limited long-term prospective clinical evidence. This trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of astragalus on kidney function decline in macroalbuminuric diabetic CKD patients. METHODS: This randomized, assessor-blind, standard care-controlled, multi-center clinical trial randomly assigned 118 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 30-90 ml/min/1.73m2 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) of 300-5000 mg/g from 7 public outpatient clinics and the community in Hong Kong between July 2018 and April 2022 to add-on oral astragalus granules (15 gs of raw herbs daily equivalent) or to continue standard care alone as control for 48 weeks. Primary outcomes were the slope of change of eGFR (used for sample size calculation) and UACR of the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included endpoint blood pressures, biochemistry, biomarkers, concomitant drug change and adverse events. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03535935) RESULTS: During the 48-week period, the estimated difference in the slope of eGFR decline was 4.6 ml/min/1.73m2 per year (95 %CI: 1.5 to 7.6, p = 0.003) slower with astragalus. For UACR, the estimated inter-group proportional difference in the slope of change was insignificant (1.14, 95 %CI: 0.85 to 1.52, p = 0.392). 117 adverse events from 31 astragalus-treated patients and 41 standard care-controlled patients were documented. The 48-week endpoint systolic blood pressure was 7.9 mmHg lower (95 %CI: -12.9 to -2.8, p = 0.003) in the astragalus-treated patients. 113 (96 %) and 107 (91 %) patients had post-randomization and endpoint primary outcome measures, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with type 2 diabetes, stage 2 to 3 CKD and macroalbuminuria, add-on astragalus for 48 weeks further stabilized kidney function on top of standard care.

Palopegteriparatide Treatment Improves Renal Function in Adults with Chronic Hypoparathyroidism: 1-Year Results from the Phase 3 PaTHway Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with chronic hypoparathyroidism managed with conventional therapy (active vitamin D and calcium) have an increased risk for renal dysfunction versus age- and sex-matched controls. Treatments that replace the physiologic effects of parathyroid hormone (PTH) while reducing the need for conventional therapy may help prevent a decline in renal function in this population. This post hoc analysis examined the impact of palopegteriparatide treatment on renal function in adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism. METHODS: PaTHway is a phase 3 trial of palopegteriparatide in adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism that included a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 26-week period followed by an ongoing 156-week open-label extension (OLE) period. Changes in renal function over 52 weeks (26 weeks blinded + 26 weeks OLE) were assessed using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A subgroup analysis was performed with participants stratified by baseline eGFR < 60 or ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS: At week 52, over 95% (78/82) of participants remained enrolled in the OLE and of those, 86% maintained normocalcemia and 95% achieved independence from conventional therapy (no active vitamin D and ≤ 600 mg/day of calcium), with none requiring active vitamin D. Treatment with palopegteriparatide over 52 weeks resulted in a mean (SD) increase in eGFR of 9.3 (11.7) mL/min/1.73 m2 from baseline (P < 0.0001) and 43% of participants had an increase ≥ 10 mL/min/1.73 m2. In participants with baseline eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 52 weeks of treatment with palopegteriparatide resulted in a mean (SD) increase of 11.5 (11.3) mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001). One case of nephrolithiasis was reported for a participant in the placebo group during blinded treatment; none were reported through week 52 with palopegteriparatide. CONCLUSION: In this post hoc analysis of the PaTHway trial, palopegteriparatide treatment was associated with significantly improved eGFR at week 52 in addition to previously reported maintenance and normalization of serum and urine biochemistries. Further investigation of palopegteriparatide for the preservation of renal function in hypoparathyroidism is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04701203.

Chronic hypoparathyroidism is caused by inadequate parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. Hypoparathyroidism is managed with conventional therapy (active vitamin D and calcium), but over time the disease itself and conventional therapy can increase the risk of medical complications including kidney problems. This study looked at how a new treatment for chronic hypoparathyroidism, palopegteriparatide (approved in the European Union under the brand name YORVIPATH^®), affects kidney function in adults in the PaTHway clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive palopegteriparatide or a placebo injection once daily along with conventional therapy. For both groups, clinicians used a protocol to eliminate conventional therapy while maintaining normal blood calcium levels. After 26 weeks, participants on placebo switched to palopegteriparatide. Ninety-five percent of participants were still enrolled in the PaTHway trial after 52 weeks. Of those, 86% had normal blood calcium levels and 95% did not need conventional therapy (not taking vitamin D and not taking therapeutic doses of calcium [> 600 mg/day]). After 52 weeks of treatment with palopegteriparatide, significant improvements were seen in a measure of kidney function called estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Improvements in eGFR from the beginning of the trial to week 52 were considered clinically meaningful for over 57% of participants. In participants with impaired kidney function at the beginning of the trial, eGFR improvements were even greater, and 74% of participants had a clinically meaningful improvement. These results suggest that palopegteriparatide treatment may be beneficial for kidney function in adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism, especially those with impaired kidney function.

Long-term impact of immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy on kidney health in people with HIV.

People with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to HIV and antiretroviral therapy (ART) nephrotoxicity. Immediate ART initiation reduces mortality and is now the standard of care, but the long-term impact of prolonged ART exposure on CKD is unknown. To evaluate this, the Strategic Timing of Antiretroviral Treatment (START) trial randomized 4,684 ART-naïve adults with CD4 cell count under 500 cells/mm3 to immediate versus deferred ART. We previously reported a small but statistically significantly greater decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over a median of 2.1 years in participants randomized to deferred versus immediate ART. Here, we compare the incidence of CKD events and changes in eGFR and urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) in participants randomized to immediate versus deferred ART during extended follow-up. Over a median of 9.3 years, eight participants experienced kidney failure or kidney-related death, three in the immediate and five in the deferred ART arms, respectively. Over a median of five years of more comprehensive follow-up, the annual rate of eGFR decline was 1.19 mL/min/1.73m2/year, with no significant difference between treatment arms (difference deferred - immediate arm 0.055; 95% confidence interval -0.106, 0.217 mL/min/1.73m2). Results were similar in models adjusted for baseline covariates associated with CKD, including UACR and APOL1 genotype. Similarly, there was no significant difference between treatment arms in incidence of confirmed UACR 30 mg/g or more (odds ratio 1.13; 95% confidence interval 0.85, 1.51). Thus, our findings provide the most definitive evidence to date in support of the long-term safety of early ART with respect to kidney health.

Renal function and natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy - a pre-specified analysis from the PUSH-AHF trial.

AIM: In a randomized controlled trial, we recently showed that a natriuresis-guided diuretic approach improved natriuresis and diuresis in patients with acute heart failure (HF). In this pre-specified analysis, we investigated the association between (worsening) renal function, outcomes and the effect of intensive natriuresis-guided loop diuretic therapy as compared with standard of care. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Pragmatic Urinary Sodium-based algoritHm in Acute Heart Failure (PUSH-AHF) trial randomized patients to natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy or standard of care. Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were assessed at fixed timepoints, and worsening renal function (WRF) was assessed at 72 h. The primary outcome was the interaction between randomized treatment allocation, baseline eGFR and the dual primary outcome of PUSH-AHF: total natriuresis at 24 h and time to all-cause mortality or HF rehospitalization at 180 days. In 309 patients, median baseline eGFR was 53 (35-73) ml/min/1.73 m2, and 58% had eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Baseline eGFR did not significantly modify the treatment effect of natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy on natriuresis at 24 h (p for interaction = 0.730). However, baseline eGFR significantly modified the effect on all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization (p for interaction = 0.017): the risk of this second primary outcome was lower in patients with lower eGFR who were randomized to the natriuresis-guided group. In the natriuresis-guided arm, eGFR decreased more (-11.0 vs. -6.91 ml/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.002) during the first 3 days, but this effect was attenuated at discharge (-10.3 vs. -8.69 ml/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.38). WRF was more frequently observed in patients randomized to natriuresis-guided treatment, but was not associated with worse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Natriuresis-guided diuretic treatment improved diuresis and natriuresis irrespective of baseline eGFR and occurrence of WRF, was effective even in patients with low eGFR, and the observed effect on eGFR was transient and not associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Effect of preceding drug therapy on the renal and cardiovascular outcomes of combined sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.

AIM: To conduct a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) from the RECAP study, who were treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) combination therapy, focusing only on those patients who had chronic kidney disease (CKD), to examine whether the composite renal outcome differed between those who received SGLT2 inhibitor treatment first and those who received a GLP-1RA first. METHODS: We included 438 patients with CKD (GLP-1RA-first group, n = 223; SGLT2 inhibitor-first group, n = 215) from the 643 T2D patients in the RECAP study. The incidence of the composite renal outcome, defined as progression to macroalbuminuria and/or a ≥50% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), was analysed using a propensity score (PS)-matched model. Furthermore, we calculated the win ratio for these composite renal outcomes, which were weighted in the following order: (1) both a ≥50% decrease in eGFR and progression to macroalbuminuria; (2) a decrease in eGFR of ≥50% only; and (3) progression to macroalbuminuria only. RESULTS: Using the PS-matched model, 132 patients from each group were paired. The incidence of renal composite outcomes did not differ between the two groups (GLP-1RA-first group, 10%; SGLT2 inhibitor-first group, 17%; odds ratio 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 4.26; p = 0.12). The win ratio of the GLP-1RA-first group versus the SGLT2 inhibitor-first group was 1.83 (95% CI 1.71 to 1.95; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although the renal composite outcome did not differ between the two groups, the win ratio of the GLP-1RA-first group versus the SGLT2 inhibitor-first group was significant. These results suggest that, in GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor combination therapy, the addition of an SGLT2 inhibitor to baseline GLP-1RA treatment may lead to more favourable renal outcomes.

Alterations in regulators of the renal-bone axis, inflammation and iron status in older people with early renal impairment and the effect of vitamin D supplementation.

CONTEXT: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) leads to alterations in fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and the renal-bone axis. This may be partly driven by altered inflammation and iron status. Vitamin D supplementation may reduce inflammation. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Older adults with early CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30-60 ml/min/1.73 m2; CKDG3a/b; n = 35) or normal renal function (eGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2; CKDG1; n = 35) received 12,000, 24,000 or 48,000 IU D3/month for 1 year. Markers of the renal-bone axis, inflammation and iron status were investigated pre- and post-supplementation. Predictors of c-terminal and intact FGF23 (cFGF23; iFGF23) were identified by univariate and multivariate regression. RESULTS: Pre-supplementation, comparing CKDG3a/b to CKDG1, plasma cFGF23, iFGF23, PTH, sclerostin and TNFα were significantly higher and Klotho, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and iron were lower. Post-supplementation, only cFGF23, 25(OH)D and IL6 differed between groups. The response to supplementation differed between eGFR groups. Only in the CKDG1 group, phosphate decreased, cFGF23, iFGF23 and procollagen type I N-propeptide increased. In the CKDG3a/b group, TNFα significantly decreased, and iron increased. Plasma 25(OH)D and IL10 increased, and carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks decreased in both groups. In univariate models cFGF23 and iFGF23 were predicted by eGFR and regulators of calcium and phosphate metabolism at both time points; IL6 predicted cFGF23 (post-supplementation) and iFGF23 (pre-supplementation) in univariate models. Hepcidin predicted post-supplementation cFGF23 in multivariate models with eGFR. CONCLUSION: Alterations in regulators of the renal-bone axis, inflammation and iron status were found in early CKD. The response to vitamin D3 supplementation differed between eGFR groups. Plasma IL6 predicted both cFGF23 and iFGF23 and hepcidin predicted cFGF23.