Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 Hours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The current European Stroke Organisation expedited recommendation on tenecteplase (TNK) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) advocates that TNK 0.25 mg/kg can be used alternatively to alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator [TPA]) for AIS of <4.5 hours duration, based on a meta-analytical approach establishing noninferiority. Since the publication of these guidelines, 4 additional randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have provided further insight. METHODS: We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including all available RCTs that investigated efficacy and safety of TNK 0.25 mg/kg compared with TPA for the treatment of AIS within 4.5 hours of onset. The primary outcome was defined as the excellent functional outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-1), whereas good functional outcome (mRS score 0-2), reduced disability at 3 months (≥1-point reduction across all mRS scores), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 3-month mortality were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Pooled estimates were calculated with random-effects model. A prespecified subgroup analysis was performed stratifying for TNK formulation, that is, original TNK vs biocopy: recombinant human TNK tissue-type plasminogen activator that is available in China and has a different production process. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were included comprising a total of 3,788 patients treated with TNK vs 3,757 patients treated with TPA. TNK was associated with higher likelihood of excellent functional outcome (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.10; p = 0.012; I2 = 0%; risk difference 2.95%; 95% CI 0.76%-5.14%; p = 0.008; I2 = 0%) and reduced disability at 3 months (common odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.19; p = 0.034; I2 = 0%) compared with TPA while good functional outcome (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.07; p = 0.142; I2 = 28%) was similar between the groups. Regarding safety outcomes, similar rates of sICH (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.83-1.53; p = 0.456; I2 = 0%) and 3-month mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.15; p = 0.727; I2 = 12%) were observed. When stratified for TNK regimen (original vs biocopy), statistical significance in achieving an excellent functional outcome at 3 months was retained for the original TNK (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.10; p = 0.044; I2 = 0%). DISCUSSION: The updated meta-analysis confirms similar safety between TNK 0.25 mg/kg and TPA, while showing that TNK is superior to TPA regarding excellent functional outcome and reduced disability at 3 months. These findings support transitioning to TNK in clinical practice.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Treating Acute Ischemic Stroke With Diabetes and Admission Hyperglycemia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke, considering their diabetes history and admission hyperglycemia status. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-2 (Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events-2) randomized clinical trial that enrolled patients in China between June 2021 and May 2022. Eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke for standard intravenous thrombolysis, but ineligible for endovascular thrombectomy, were randomly assigned (1:1) to tenecteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Admission hyperglycemia was defined as plasma glucose >7.8 mmol/L. The primary efficacy and safety outcome were excellent functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours, respectively. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test was used for the outcomes. Of the 1382 patients included, 369 (26.7%) had a history of diabetes, and 482 (34.9%) experienced admission hyperglycemia. The primary efficacy outcome, comparing tenecteplase to alteplase, was achieved in 93 (56.7%) versus 97 (48.3%) among patients with a history of diabetes (P=0.11) and 335 (64.6%) versus 300 (62.2%) among those without diabetes (P=0.45), respectively. The primary efficacy outcome for tenecteplase versus alteplase was comparable among patients with and without admission hyperglycemia (57.5% versus 53.9%, P = 0.44; 65.4% versus 60.4%, P=0.12, respectively). No significant difference in the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours was observed between tenecteplase and alteplase, regardless of diabetes history or admission hyperglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that intravenous tenecteplase exhibits similar clinical outcomes compared with alteplase, irrespective of the patient's glucose metabolism status. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04797013.

Mortality Outcomes with Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in the Treatment of Massive Pulmonary Embolism.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) leads to many emergency department visits annually. Thrombolytic agents, such as alteplase, are currently recommended for massive PE, but genetically modified tenecteplase (TNK) presents advantages. Limited comparative studies exist between TNK and alteplase in PE treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and mortality of TNK compared with alteplase in patients with PE using real-world evidence obtained from a large multicenter registry. Primary outcomes included mortality, intracranial hemorrhage, and blood transfusions. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX Global Health Research Network. Patients aged 18 years or older with a PE diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification code I26) were included. The following two cohorts were defined: TNK-treated (29 organizations, 266 cases) and alteplase-treated (22,864 cases). Propensity matching controlled for demographic characteristics, anticoagulant use, pre-existing conditions, and vital sign abnormalities associated with PE severity. Patients received TNK or alteplase within 7 days of diagnosis and outcomes were measured at 30 days post thrombolysis. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-three patients in each cohort were comparable in demographic characteristics and pre-existing conditions. Mortality rates at 30 days post thrombolysis were similar between TNK and alteplase cohorts (19.4% vs 19.8%; risk ratio 0.982; 95% CI 0.704-1.371). Rates of intracerebral hemorrhages and transfusion were too infrequent to analyze. CONCLUSIONS: This study found TNK to exhibit a similar mortality rate to alteplase in the treatment of PE with hemodynamic instability. The results necessitate prospective evaluation. Given the cost-effectiveness and ease of administration of TNK, these findings contribute to the ongoing discussion about its adoption as a primary thrombolytic agent for stroke and PE.

Safety and Efficacy Comparison of Tenecteplase and Alteplase for Clinically Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes without Thrombectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Tenecteplase is a thrombolytic with higher fibrin affinity and is potentially better in clot lysis. A higher spontaneous recanalisation rate for large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes had been shown in comparison studies with alteplase. Results of the LVO studies reflect the composite effect of the thrombolytic and thrombectomy, as patients would be treated by thrombectomy had they not been recanalised by intravenous thrombolysis alone. Thrombectomy is not readily available in many parts of the world. Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of suspected LVO patients treated with tenecteplase versus alteplase only, without the confounding effect of thrombectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective review. Data of patients given tenecteplase from May 2020 to August 2023 and those given alteplase 0.9 mg/kg from January 2019 to August 2023 were retrieved. Due to fluctuation in supply of tenecteplase during the COVID pandemic, some LVO patients were given alteplase. Patients with anterior circulation, clinically suspected LVO strokes (defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥6, plus cortical signs or hyperdense vessel sign), with thrombolysis given within 4.5 h of stroke onset were analysed. Patients with thrombectomy done were excluded. Safety and efficacy outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There were 245 tenecteplase-treated patients treated between May 1, 2020, and August 31, 2023, and 732 patients were treated with alteplase between January 1, 2019, to August 31, 2023. Out of these, 148 tenecteplase patients and 138 alteplase 0.9 mg/kg patients fulfilled the study criteria. The symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage rate was non-significantly lower in the tenecteplase group (2.1% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.13). There were no significant differences in the rate of ≥8-point NIHSS improvement (23.6% vs. 23.7%, p = 1) or the ≥4-point improvement (40.5% vs. 40.7%, p = 1) at 24 h. At 3 months, 21.6% of tenecteplase patients had good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-2), compared to 26.3% in the alteplase group (p = 0.40). CONCLUSION: In this pragmatic study of clinically suspected anterior circulation LVO patients without thrombectomy, outcome solely reflects the effects of tenecteplase. Tenecteplase showed comparable safety and efficacy to alteplase, but the result should be interpreted with caution in view of its small sample size and non-randomised study design.

Thrombolysis with Tenecteplase for Basilar Artery Occlusion in Neuro and Allied Clinic: Importance of Clinical Assessment and Drip and Ship Model in Nepal.

Tenecteplase, a new thrombolytic drug, is now widely recommended and used for treating acute ischemic stroke, and timely thrombolysis within 4.5 hours is crucial for better outcomes. However, due to limited stroke awareness, transportation difficulties, and inadequate access to experts and comprehensive stroke care centers, fewer than 15% of stroke patients in Nepal receive thrombolytic therapy. The "drip and ship" model, which involves starting thrombolysis at a noncomprehensive stroke care center and transferring the patient to another center for further care, can effectively overcome these obstacles, provided trained personnel are available at non-comprehensive stroke care centers. We report a case of acute ischemic stroke treated with thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of symptom onset at a non-comprehensive stroke care center, followed by transfer to another center for ongoing care, demonstrating the feasibility and potential benefits of the drip and ship model in resource-limited settings.

Adverse events of tissue plasminogen activators in acute myocardial infarction patients: a real-world and pharmacovigilance database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is recommended as the preferred thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to explore tPA-related adverse events (AEs) reported in the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), assess the potential safety of three preferred tPA therapies for treating AMI, and provide guidance for selecting tPA for prehospital thrombolysis. METHOD: Four algorithms, including ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS, were used to quantify the signals of Tenecteplase, Reteplase, and Alteplase related AEs and compare the differential degrees of the three tPA-associated AEs in the actual data. RESULT: We detected 18 signals of Tenecteplase-induced AE, 29 signals of Reteplase-induced AE, and 22 signals of Alteplase-induced AE. Among the three drugs, Tenecteplase had the highest signal intensity for intracranial hemorrhage-related AE, followed by Alteplase. Besides, Reteplase had the highest signal intensity for procedure-related AE and Alteplase had the highest signal intensity for arrhythmia-related AE. The time-onset analysis indicates that we should be vigilant for AEs, especially within the first week and the first 1-2 days after medication. CONCLUSION: This study identified and compared the signals of AE related to Tenecteplase, Reteplase, and Alteplase in AMI patients.

"Intraosseous administration of tenecteplase for thrombolysis of an acute ischemic stroke".

INTRO: Current guidelines for acute ischemic stroke recommend timely administration of intravascular thrombolytic therapy to promote functional and neurologic outcomes. Tenecteplase is an emerging off-label therapy for this indication and being utilized by various institutions due to its simpler administration strategy. In emergent situations in which intravenous access cannot be obtained, intraosseous access is a viable option for medication administration. However, there has been minimal published cases to support the efficacy and safety of intraosseous administration of tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke. CASE: We describe the case of a 51-year-old woman who developed acute ischemic stroke within our institution. Due to difficulty achieving intravenous access and time-dependent efficacy of thrombolytic therapy, the decision was made to administer tenecteplase by the intraosseous route. Stroke symptoms improved within 48 hours following administration without complication. CONCLUSION: Intraosseous administration of tenecteplase may be considered for treatment of acute ischemic stroke if intravenous access is unattainable.

Tenecteplase versus alteplase before stroke thrombectomy: outcomes after system-wide transitions in Pennsylvania.

INTRODUCTION: United States stroke systems are increasingly transitioning from alteplase (TPA) to tenecteplase (TNK). Real-world data on the safety and effectiveness of replacing TPA with TNK before large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke endovascular treatment (EVT) are lacking. METHODS: Four Pennsylvania stroke systems transitioned from TPA to TNK during the study period 01/2020-06/2023. LVO stroke patients who received intravenous thrombolysis with TPA or TNK before EVT were reviewed. Multivariate logistic analysis was conducted adjusting for age, sex, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), occlusion site, last-known-well-to-intravenous thrombolysis time, interhospital-transfer and stroke system. RESULTS: Of 635 patients, 309 (48.7%) received TNK and 326 (51.3%) TPA prior to EVT. The site of occlusion was the M1 middle cerebral artery (MCA) (47.7%), M2 MCA (25.4%), internal carotid artery (14.0%), tandem carotid with M1 or M2 MCA (9.8%) and basilar artery (3.1%). A favorable functional outcome (90-day mRS ≤ 2) was observed in 47.6% of TNK and 49.7% of TPA patients (p = 0.132). TNK versus TPA groups had similar rates of early recanalization (11.9% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.259), successful endovascular reperfusion (93.5% vs. 89.3%, p = 0.627), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (3.2% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.218) and 90-day all-cause mortality (23.1% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.491). CONCLUSIONS: This U.S. multicenter real-world clinical experience demonstrated that switching from TPA to TNK before EVT for LVO stroke resulted in similar endovascular reperfusion, safety, and functional outcomes.

[Thrombolysis alert in ischemic stroke: experience of the international private clinic Al Badie in Fez (cross-sectional study of 60 cases)]. / Les alertes de thrombolyse des accidents vasculaires cérébraux ischémiques: expérience de la clinique internationale Al Badie au secteur libéral de Fès (étude transversale de 60 cas).

Intravenous thrombolysis is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke. We here report the cases of thrombolysis alert in the private sector in Morocco We conducted a prospective study of all patients with neurological deficit of sudden onset occurred within the first 12 hours admitted to the Emergency Department of the Al Badie international private clinic from January 2022 to September 2023. Epidemiological, clinical and etiological characteristics as well as data on outpatient and inpatient delays were collected. Sixty patients were included in the study. The average admission delay was 198.36 ± 79.23 minutes. The mean NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score was 10.41 ± 4.97. The average time for imaging was 26.68 ± 9.63 minutes. Ischaemic stroke was the most common diagnosis (85%), followed by "stroke mimics" (11.6%). Thirteen patients underwent thrombolysis with tenecteplase. The mean time from admission to the initiation of thrombolysis was 107.15 ± 24.48 minutes. Follow-up imaging at 24 hours post thrombolysis revealed symptomatic haemorrhagic transformation in 3 patients. Six patients were transferred to the Hassan II University Hospital for thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy. After 3 months, 4 patients were autonomous (Rankin score changed between 0 and 2). Our experience shows that it is imperative to reduce outpatient and inpatient delays in treatment in order to increase the proportion of patients treated with thrombolysis.

Thrombolysis in acute retinal ischemia treated with tenecteplase.

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), a type of acute retinal arterial ischemia, analogous to an ocular stroke, is a medical emergency that warrants immediate diagnosis and treatment. CRAO usually presents with sudden, painless, monocular vision loss. Ipsilateral carotid artery disease is an important associated finding in these patients. The primary limitation to effective treatment of CRAO is that patients are rarely seen in the acute stage. Moreover, there are no guidelines for effective treatment. We report a patient with right CRAO whose treatment with intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase and anterior chamber paracentesis with ocular massage resulted in a good clinical outcome.

Tenecteplase for Ischemic Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours without Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Tenecteplase is an effective thrombolytic agent for eligible patients with stroke who are treated within 4.5 hours after the onset of stroke. However, data regarding the effectiveness of tenecteplase beyond 4.5 hours are limited. METHODS: In a trial conducted in China, we randomly assigned patients with large-vessel occlusion of the middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery who had salvageable brain tissue as identified on perfusion imaging and who did not have access to endovascular thrombectomy to receive tenecteplase (at a dose of 0.25 mg per kilogram of body weight; maximum dose, 25 mg) or standard medical treatment 4.5 to 24 hours after the time that the patient was last known to be well (including after stroke on awakening and unwitnessed stroke). The primary outcome was the absence of disability, which was defined as a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability), at day 90. The key safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death. RESULTS: A total of 516 patients were enrolled; 264 were randomly assigned to receive tenecteplase and 252 to receive standard medical treatment. Less than 2% of the patients (4 in the tenecteplase group and 5 in the standard-treatment group) underwent rescue endovascular thrombectomy. Treatment with tenecteplase resulted in a higher percentage of patients with a modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days than standard medical treatment (33.0% vs. 24.2%; relative rate, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.81; P = 0.03). Mortality at 90 days was 13.3% with tenecteplase and 13.1% with standard medical treatment, and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours after treatment was 3.0% and 0.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving Chinese patients with ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion, most of whom did not undergo endovascular thrombectomy, treatment with tenecteplase administered 4.5 to 24 hours after stroke onset resulted in less disability and similar survival as compared with standard medical treatment, and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage appeared to be higher. (Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and others; TRACE-III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05141305.).

Low Dose Aspirin Initiation 18 Hours After Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety of administering low-dose aspirin (81 mg) 18 hours after intravenous thrombolytic therapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort investigation. Individuals received either alteplase or tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke followed by aspirin 81 mg (after follow-up imaging). An institutional change moved follow-up post-thrombolytic CT scans to 18 hours, and qualifying patients were grouped based on whether they received aspirin ≤24 hours or >24 hours. Chart reviews were conducted to assess the primary outcome of new or worsening intracranial hemorrhage, as well as secondary outcomes of change in stroke scale scores at discharge and 3 months, lengths of stay, favorable outcomes at 3 months, hospital readmission, and mortality. RESULTS: Out of 350 patients screened, 130 qualified for inclusion-50 of whom received aspirin ≤24 hours (mean 21.1 hours, SD±6.2), and 80 who received aspirin >24 hours (mean 34 hours, SD±8.2). Only 1 new intracranial bleed occurred following aspirin administration in the >24-hour group. No statistically significant differences were observed in any of the secondary outcomes, although there was higher mortality (3/50 vs. 2/80, P =0.372) and shorter hospital length of stay (median difference -1.0 day, P =0.0336) in the <24 hours group. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose aspirin administration sooner than 24 hours following thrombolytic therapy did not increase bleeding events. Sooner aspirin administration after ischemic stroke can potentially enhance the prevention of secondary embolization and did not demonstrate worse clinical outcomes; however, further randomized controlled trials are needed.

Comparative efficacy and safety among different doses of tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Tenecteplase (TNK) is a promising alternative to alteplase (ALT) as the thrombolytic agent for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, its clinical outcomes in certain populations remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety among different doses of TNK in AIS patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase for studies comparing at least one dose of TNK to another dose of TNK or ALT 0.90 mg/kg. We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses to estimate the relative risks (RRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) for all outcomes using ALT 0.90 mg/kg as the reference. The treatments were ranked according to their surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values. RESULTS: We included 11 trials from 16 publications comprising 5423 participants. There were no significant differences between any doses of TNK and ALT for reperfusion, 3-month modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0-1 (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.68), mRS 0-2 (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.86), mortality (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.82), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.88), symptomatic ICH (sICH) (rank 1st: TNK 0.10 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.70), and parenchymal hematoma (rank 1st: TNK 0.10 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.68). TNK 0.40 mg/kg had a significantly higher sICH rate compared to TNK 0.25 mg/kg (RR = 2.39, 95% CrI = 1.00-7.92). Among elderly patients, TNK 0.25 mg/kg had a significantly lower rate of sICH than ALT 0.9 mg/kg (RR = 3.0 × 10-13, 95% CrI = 3.4 × 10-40-0.07). CONCLUSIONS: TNK has efficacy and safety outcomes comparable to those of ALT. TNK 0.25 mg/kg may be the optimal dose of TNK for patients with AIS.

Tenecteplase versus alteplase for thrombolysis in patients selected by use of perfusion imaging within 4·5 h of onset of ischaemic stroke (TASTE): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous tenecteplase increases reperfusion in patients with salvageable brain tissue on perfusion imaging and might have advantages over alteplase as a thrombolytic for ischaemic stroke. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of tenecteplase versus alteplase on clinical outcomes in patients selected by use of perfusion imaging. METHODS: This international, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, clinical non-inferiority trial enrolled patients from 35 hospitals in eight countries. Participants were aged 18 years or older, within 4·5 h of ischaemic stroke onset or last known well, were not being considered for endovascular thrombectomy, and met target mismatch criteria on brain perfusion imaging. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by use of a centralised web server with randomly permuted blocks to intravenous tenecteplase (0·25 mg/kg) or alteplase (0·90 mg/kg). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients without disability (modified Rankin Scale 0-1) at 3 months, assessed via masked review in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. We aimed to recruit 832 participants to yield 90% power (one-sided alpha=0·025) to detect a risk difference of 0·08, with an absolute non-inferiority margin of -0·03. The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12613000243718, and the European Union Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT Number 2015-002657-36, and it is completed. FINDINGS: Recruitment ceased early following the announcement of other trial results showing non-inferiority of tenecteplase versus alteplase. Between March 21, 2014, and Oct 20, 2023, 680 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to tenecteplase (n=339) and alteplase (n=341), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (multiple imputation was used to account for missing primary outcome data for five patients). Protocol violations occurred in 74 participants, thus the per-protocol population comprised 601 people (295 in the tenecteplase group and 306 in the alteplase group). Participants had a median age of 74 years (IQR 63-82), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 7 (4-11), and 260 (38%) were female. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 191 (57%) of 335 participants allocated to tenecteplase and 188 (55%) of 340 participants allocated to alteplase (standardised risk difference [SRD]=0·03 [95% CI -0·033 to 0·10], one-tailed pnon-inferiority=0·031). In the per-protocol analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 173 (59%) of 295 participants allocated to tenecteplase and 171 (56%) of 306 participants allocated to alteplase (SRD 0·05 [-0·02 to 0·12], one-tailed pnon-inferiority=0·01). Nine (3%) of 337 patients in the tenecteplase group and six (2%) of 340 in the alteplase group had symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (unadjusted risk difference=0·01 [95% CI -0·01 to 0·03]) and 23 (7%) of 335 and 15 (4%) of 340 died within 90 days of starting treatment (SRD 0·02 [95% CI -0·02 to 0·05]). INTERPRETATION: The findings in our study provide further evidence to strengthen the assertion of the non-inferiority of tenecteplase to alteplase, specifically when perfusion imaging has been used to identify reperfusion-eligible stroke patients. Although non-inferiority was achieved in the per-protocol population, it was not reached in the intention-to-treat analysis, possibly due to sample size limtations. Nonetheless, large-scale implementation of perfusion CT to assist in patient selection for intravenous thrombolysis in the early time window was shown to be feasible. FUNDING: Australian National Health Medical Research Council; Boehringer Ingelheim.

Functional Outcome and Hemorrhage Rates After Bridging Therapy With Tenecteplase or Alteplase in Patients With Large Ischemic Core.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IV tenecteplase is an alternative to alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke. Little data are available on its use in patients with large ischemic core. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of both thrombolytics in this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with anterior circulation LVO strokes and diffusion-weighed imaging Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (DWI-ASPECTS) ≤5 treated with tenecteplase or alteplase before MT from the TETRIS (tenecteplase) and ETIS (alteplase) French multicenter registries. Primary outcome was reduced disability at 3 months (ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale [mRS]). Safety outcomes were 3-month mortality, parenchymal hematoma (PH), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We used propensity score overlap weighting to reduce baseline differences between treatment groups. RESULTS: We analyzed 647 patients (tenecteplase: n = 194; alteplase: n = 453; inclusion period 2015-2022). Median (interquartile range) age was 71 (57-81) years, with NIH Stroke Scale score 19 (16-22), DWI-ASPECTS 4 (3-5), and last seen well-to-IV thrombolysis and puncture times 165 minutes (130-226) and 260 minutes (203-349), respectively. After MT, the successful reperfusion rate was 83.1%. After propensity score overlap weighting, all baseline variables were well balanced between both treatment groups. Compared with patients treated with alteplase, patients treated with tenecteplase had better 3-month mRS (common odds ratio [OR] for reduced disability: 1.37, 1.01-1.87, p = 0.046) and lower 3-month mortality (OR 0.52, 0.33-0.81, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between thrombolytics for PH (OR 0.84, 0.55-1.30, p = 0.44) and sICH incidence (OR 0.70, 0.42-1.18, p = 0.18). DISCUSSION: Our data are encouraging regarding the efficacy and reassuring regarding the safety of tenecteplase compared with that of alteplase in bridging therapy for patients with LVO strokes and a large ischemic core in routine clinical care. These results support its consideration as an alternative to alteplase in bridging therapy for patients with large ischemic cores. TRIALS REGISTRATION INFORMATION: NCT03776877 (ETIS registry) and NCT05534360 (TETRIS registry). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that patients with anterior circulation LVO stroke and DWI-ASPECTS ≤5 treated with tenecteplase vs alteplase before MT experienced better functional outcomes and lower mortality at 3 months.

[Therapeutic effect of intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase on patients with post awakening branch atheromatous disease].

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with Tenecteplase (TNK) in patients with post-awakening branch atheromatous disease (BAD). Methods: A retrospective collection was conducted on 178 patients with post-awakening BAD admitted to the Stroke Centre of Zhengzhou People's Hospital from January 2017 to June 2023, who had a mismatch in DWI/FLAIR on magnetic resonance imaging. The patients were divided into thrombolysis group (60 patients) and control group (118 patients) according to whether or not they were applied to intravenous thrombolysis by TNK. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to pair and balance the confounding factors at 1∶1 between the two groups, and the 90-d long-term prognosis of the patients was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the Barthel Index (BI). The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was used to compare the early neurological changes between the two groups.The differences in clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Fifty-two pairs of patients, 65 males and 39 females, aged (60±9) years, were successfully matched by PSM. The thrombolysis group had lower NIHSS score than that of the control group at 24 h, 7 d, 14 d after treatment or at discharge [3(2, 5) vs 4(3, 7), 3(2, 5) vs 4(3, 5), and 2(1, 4) vs 3(2, 4)], and shorter hospital stay than that of the control group [9(7, 12) d vs 11(9, 13) d], and at the same time, the thrombolysis group was less likely to experience early neurological deterioration (END) [9.6% (5/52) vs 28.9% (15/52)], and the proportion of 90 d mRS≤1, mRS≤2, and BI scores were higher than those in the control group [63.5% (33/52) vs 30.8% (16/52), 82.7% (43/52) vs 59.6% (31/52), and (91±8) points vs (82±8) points ], all differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The percentage of mRS≥4 points was higher in the control group than that in the thrombolysis group [23.1% (12/52) vs 7.7% (4/52)]. One case of intracranial haemorrhage occurred in the thrombolysis group, and 1 case in the control group died of pulmonary infection within 90 d of follow-up, with a case-fatality rate of 1.9% (1/52). Conclusion: In the patients with post-awakening BAD screened by MRI, TNK intravenous thrombolysis can significantly reduce the risk of END, improving long-term prognosis and has a high safety.