Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 479
Filtrar
1.
Clin Psychol Rev ; 111: 102446, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796946

RESUMEN

Cognitive behavioral therapies have been identified as evidence-based treatments for anxiety-related disorders. However, data supporting the effectiveness of these treatments have been largely collected from participants with majoritized identities, potentially limiting the extent to which they can be considered "evidence-based" for clients from minoritized groups. The current review examined sociodemographic representation and quality of sociodemographic reporting in randomized controlled trials for anxiety-related disorders in the U.S. between 1993 and 2023. We conducted a systematic literature review of U.S.-based randomized controlled trials of cognitive behavioral therapies for anxiety-related disorders, extracted data on sociodemographic variables, and rated quality of reporting. Data from 55 eligible studies (N = 4492) indicated that white and female identities were overrepresented relative to the U.S. population, with variables like disability status, sexual orientation, and religious identification consistently ignored. In addition, quality of reporting was generally poor (mean = 3.6 out of 10), with many studies failing to account for demographic variables in their analyses or description of study limitations. Publication year, sample size, and NIH funding status did not significantly predict gender representation (% women), ethnoracial representation (% white), or quality of reporting. These findings underscore the importance of critically evaluating to whom "evidence-based" treatments apply and increasing diversity of clinical samples, to ensure that evidence-based treatments are inclusive. Recommendations for future research, clinical implications, and limitations are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sociodemográficos , Estados Unidos
2.
Mil Med ; 189(7-8): e1479-e1487, 2024 Jul 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38788156

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Trauma-focused (psycho)therapies (TFTs) are often used to treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) of (military) veterans, including prolonged exposure (PE), cognitive processing therapy (CPT), and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. However, research thus far has not conclusively determined predictors of TFTs' success in this population. This scoping review's objectives are 1) to explore whether it is possible, based on currently available evidence, to match TFTs to veterans to maximize their outcomes, (2) to identify possible contraindications and adaptations of TFTs for this population, and (3) to identify gaps in the literature to guide future research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard scoping review methodology was used. "White" and "gray" literature searches resulted in 4963 unique items identified. Following title and abstract screening and full-text analysis, 187 sources were included in the review. After data extraction, a narrative summary was used to identify common themes, discrepancies between sources, and knowledge gaps. RESULTS: Included publications most often studied CPT and PE rather than eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. These TFTs were at least partly effective with mostly moderate effect sizes. Attrition rates were slightly higher for PE versus CPT. There was variance in the methodological quality of the included studies. CONCLUSION: The current literature on TFTs to treat PTSD in veterans contains several knowledge gaps, including regarding treatment matching. Future research should examine effectiveness of these treatments using multiple sources of outcomes, longer time periods, combination with other treatment, outcomes outside of PTSD symptoms (such as functioning), and resilience.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Veteranos/psicología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/normas , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Desensibilización y Reprocesamiento del Movimiento Ocular/métodos
3.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 20(6): 921-931, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300822

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The standard of care for military personnel with insomnia is cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). However, only a minority seeking insomnia treatment receive CBT-I, and little reliable guidance exists to identify those most likely to respond. As a step toward personalized care, we present results of a machine learning (ML) model to predict CBT-I response. METHODS: Administrative data were examined for n = 1,449 nondeployed US Army soldiers treated for insomnia with CBT-I who had moderate-severe baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores and completed 1 or more follow-up ISIs 6-12 weeks after baseline. An ensemble ML model was developed in a 70% training sample to predict clinically significant ISI improvement (reduction of at least 2 standard deviations on the baseline ISI distribution). Predictors included a wide range of military administrative and baseline clinical variables. Model accuracy was evaluated in the remaining 30% test sample. RESULTS: 19.8% of patients had clinically significant ISI improvement. Model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (standard error) was 0.60 (0.03). The 20% of test-sample patients with the highest probabilities of improvement were twice as likely to have clinically significant improvement compared with the remaining 80% (36.5% vs 15.7%; χ21 = 9.2, P = .002). Nearly 85% of prediction accuracy was due to 10 variables, the most important of which were baseline insomnia severity and baseline suicidal ideation. CONCLUSIONS: Pending replication, the model could be used as part of a patient-centered decision-making process for insomnia treatment. Parallel models will be needed for alternative treatments before such a system is of optimal value. CITATION: Gabbay FH, Wynn GH, Georg MW, et al. Toward personalized care for insomnia in the US Army: a machine learning model to predict response to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(6):921-931.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Aprendizaje Automático , Personal Militar , Medicina de Precisión , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Humanos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal Militar/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Subj. procesos cogn ; 26(2): 1-29, nov. 28, 2022.
Artículo en Español | LILACS, UNISALUD, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1401856

RESUMEN

Los problemas comportamentales en la infancia suponen todos aquellos comportamientos persistentes en los que se repiten conductas que no respetan las normas o las reglas sociales propias de la edad. La detección temprana de estas dificultades permite controlar en cierto modo la gravedad del asunto ya que, de no trabajarse sobre la sintomatología del niño, las posibilidades de desarrollar un trastorno mental severo son mayores. Así, la identificación y el diagnóstico de los problemas conductuales se ha vuelto una meta de gran significación para la disciplina psicológica. El objetivo de este estudio fue realizar una revisión de la literatura reciente para sistematizar la información referida a las diferentes conceptualizaciones teóricas que existen sobre los problemas comportamentales desde diversas escuelas psicológicas y las respuestas terapéuticas que ofrecen, identificar los instrumentos de medición validados para su evaluación en Argentina, y describir la importancia de su detección temprana y posibles áreas de incidencia(AU)


Behavioral problems in childhood involve all those persistent actions in which activities that do not respect the norms or social rules of the age are repeated. Early detection of these problems makes it possible to control the severity of the problem to a certain extent. If the child's symptoms are not elaborated, the chances of developing a severe mental disorder are greater. Thus, the identification and diagnosis of behavioral problems has become a goal of great significance for the psychological discipline. The objective of this article was to carry out a review of the recent literature to systematize the information referring to the different theoretical conceptualizations that exist on behavioral problems from various psychological schools and the therapeutic responses they offer. Also,to identify the measurement instruments validated for their evaluation in Argentina and describe the importance of its early detection and possible areas of incidence(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/psicología , Psicología Infantil , Emociones , Relaciones Familiares/psicología , Problema de Conducta/psicología
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(2): e2146716, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35142833

RESUMEN

Importance: Depression is a common disorder that may go untreated or receive suboptimal care in primary care settings. Computer-assisted cognitive behavior therapy (CCBT) has been proposed as a method for improving access to effective psychotherapy, reducing cost, and increasing the convenience and efficiency of treatment for depression. Objectives: To evaluate whether clinician-supported CCBT is more effective than treatment as usual (TAU) in primary care patients with depression and to examine the feasibility and implementation of CCBT in a primary care population with substantial numbers of patients with low income, limited internet access, and low levels of educational attainment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial included adult primary care patients from clinical practices at the University of Louisville who scored 10 or greater on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and were randomly assigned to CCBT or TAU for 12 weeks of active treatment. Follow-up assessments were conducted 3 and 6 months after treatment completion. Enrollment occurred from June 24, 2016, to May 13, 2019. The last follow-up assessment was conducted on January 30, 2020. Interventions: CCBT included use of the 9-lesson computer program Good Days Ahead, along with as many as 12 weekly telephonic support sessions of approximately 20 minutes with a master's level therapist, in addition to TAU, which consisted of the standard clinical management procedures at the primary care sites. TAU was uncontrolled, but use of antidepressants and psychotherapy other than CCBT was recorded. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure (PHQ-9) and secondary outcome measures (Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire for negative cognitions, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and the Satisfaction with Life Scale for quality of life) were administered at baseline, 12 weeks, and 3 and 6 months after treatment completion. Satisfaction with treatment was assessed with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8. Results: The sample of 175 patients was predominately female (147 of 174 [84.5%]) and had a high proportion of individuals who identified as racial and ethnic minority groups (African American, 44 of 162 patients who reported [27.2%]; American Indian or Alaska Native, 2 [1.2%]; Hispanic, 4 [2.5%]; multiracial, 14 [8.6%]). An annual income of less than $30 000 was reported by 88 of 143 patients (61.5%). Overall, 95 patients (54.3%) were randomly assigned to CCBT and 80 (45.7%) to TAU. Dropout rates were 22.1% for CCBT (21 patients) and 30.0% for TAU (24 patients). An intent-to-treat analysis found that CCBT led to significantly greater improvement in PHQ-9 scores than TAU at posttreatment (mean difference, -2.5; 95% CI, -4.5 to -0.8; P = .005) and 3 month (mean difference, -2.3; 95% CI, -4.5 to -0.8; P = .006) and 6 month (mean difference, -3.2; 95% CI, -4.5 to -0.8; P = .007) follow-up points. Posttreatment response and remission rates were also significantly higher for CCBT (response, 58.4% [95% CI, 46.4-70.4%]; remission, 27.3% [95% CI, 16.4%-38.2%]) than TAU (response, 33.1% [95% CI, 20.7%-45.5%]; remission, 12.0% [95% CI, 3.3%- 20.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, CCBT was found to have significantly greater effects on depressive symptoms than TAU in primary care patients with depression. Because the study population included people with lower income and lack of internet access who typically have been underrepresented or not included in earlier investigations of CCBT, results suggest that this form of treatment can be acceptable and useful in diverse primary care settings. Additional studies with larger samples are needed to address implementation procedures that could enhance the effectiveness of CCBT and to examine potential factors associated with treatment outcome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02700009.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Depresión/terapia , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Asistida por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Kentucky , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Terapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 79(1): 33-41, 2022 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34817561

RESUMEN

Importance: Older adults with insomnia have a high risk of incident and recurrent depression. Depression prevention is urgently needed, and such efforts have been neglected for older adults. Objective: To examine whether treatment of insomnia disorder with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) compared with an active comparator condition, sleep education therapy (SET), prevents major depressive disorder in older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This assessor-blinded, parallel-group, single-site randomized clinical trial assessed a community-based sample of 431 people and enrolled 291 adults 60 years or older with insomnia disorder who had no major depression or major health events in past year. Study recruitment was performed from July 1, 2012, to April 30, 2015. The trial protocol was modified to extend follow-up from 24 to 36 months, with follow-up completion in July 2018. Data analysis was performed from March 1, 2019, to March 30, 2020. Interventions: Participants were randomized to 2 months of CBT-I (n = 156) or SET (n = 135). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to incident major depressive disorder as diagnosed by interview and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) criteria. Secondary outcome was sustained remission of insomnia disorder before depression event or duration of follow-up. Results: Among 291 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 70.1 [6.7] years; 168 [57.7%] female; 7 [2.4%] Asian, 32 [11.0%] Black, 3 [1.0%] Pacific Islander, 241 [82.8%] White, 6 [2.1%] multiracial, and 2 [0.7%] unknown), 156 were randomized to CBT-I and 135 to SET. A total of 140 participants (89.7%) completed CBT-I and 130 (96.3%) participants completed SET (χ2 = 4.9, P = .03), with 114 (73.1%) completing 24 months of follow-up in the CBT-I group and 117 (86.7%) in the SET group (χ2 = 8.4, P = .004). After protocol modification, 92 (59.0%) of the CBT-I participants and 86 (63.7%) of the SET participants agreed to extended follow-up (χ2 = 0.7, P = .41), with 81 (51.9%) of the CBT-I participants and 77 (57.0%) of the SET group completing 36 months of follow-up (χ2 = 0.8; P = .39). Incident or recurrent major depression occurred in 19 participants (12.2%) in the CBT-I group and in 35 participants (25.9%) in the SET group, with an overall benefit (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95%, CI 0.29-0.88; P = .02) consistent across subgroups. Remission of insomnia disorder continuously sustained before depression event or during follow-up was more likely in CBT-I participants (41 [26.3%]) compared with the SET participants (26 [19.3%], P = .03). Those in the CBT-I group with sustained remission of insomnia disorder had an 82.6% decreased likelihood of depression (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95%, CI 0.04-0.73; P = .02) compared with those in the SET group without sustained remission of insomnia disorder. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this randomized clinical trial indicate that treatment of insomnia with CBT-I has an overall benefit in the prevention of incident and recurrent major depression in older adults with insomnia disorder. Community-level screening for insomnia concerns in older adults and wide delivery of CBT-I-based treatment for insomnia could substantially advance public health efforts to treat insomnia and prevent depression in this vulnerable older adult population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01641263.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/etiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/prevención & control , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/normas , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Schizophr Bull ; 48(2): 359-370, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34665853

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Negative symptoms and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia (SZ) remain unmet treatment needs as they are highly prevalent, associated with poor functional outcomes, and resistant to pharmacologic treatment. The current pilot randomized controlled trial examined the efficacy of an integrated Cognitive-Behavioral Social Skills Training and Compensatory Cognitive Training (CBSST-CCT) intervention compared to Goal-focused Supportive Contact (SC) on negative symptoms and cognitive performance. METHODS: Fifty-five adults with SZ or schizoaffective disorder with moderate-to-severe negative symptoms were randomized to receive 25 twice-weekly, 1-h manualized group sessions (12.5 weeks total duration) of either CBSST-CCT or SC delivered by master's level clinicians in five community settings. Assessments of negative symptom severity (primary outcomes) and neuropsychological performance, functional capacity, social skills performance, and self-reported functional ability/everyday functioning, psychiatric symptom severity, and motivation (secondary outcomes) were administered at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Mixed-effects models using baseline, mid-treatment, and post-treatment data demonstrated significant CBSST-CCT-associated effects on negative symptom severity, as assessed by the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (p = .049, r = 0.22), with improvements in diminished motivation driving this effect (p = .037, r = 0.24). The CBSST-CCT group also demonstrated improved verbal learning compared to SC participants (p = .026, r = 0.36). The effects of CBSST-CCT appeared to be durable at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CBSST-CCT improved negative symptom severity and verbal learning in high-negative-symptom individuals relative to SC. CBSST-CCT warrants larger investigations to examine its efficacy in treating negative symptoms, along with other symptoms, cognition, and, ultimately, real-world functional outcomes. Clinical Trial registration number NCT02170051.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Adulto , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Habilidades Sociales , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 8(11): 969-980, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34653393

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many psychosocial and psychological interventions are used in patients with schizophrenia, but their comparative efficacy in the prevention of relapse is not known. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of psychosocial and psychological interventions for relapse prevention in schizophrenia. METHODS: To conduct this systematic review and network meta-analysis we searched for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials that investigated psychosocial or psychological interventions aimed at preventing relapse in patients with schizophrenia. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, BIOSIS, Cochrane Library, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to Jan 20, 2020, and searched PubMed up to April 14, 2020. We included open and masked studies done in adults with schizophrenia or related disorders. We excluded studies in which all patients were acutely ill, had a concomitant medical or psychiatric disorder, or were prodromal or "at risk of psychosis". Study selection and data extraction were done by two reviewers independently based on published and unpublished reports, and by contacting study authors. Data were extracted about efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of the interventions; potential effect moderators; and study quality and characteristics. The primary outcome was relapse measured with operationalised criteria or psychiatric hospital admissions. We did random-effects network meta-analysis to calculate odds ratios (ORs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019147884. FINDINGS: We identified 27 765 studies through the database search and 330 through references of previous reviews and studies. We screened 28 000 records after duplicates were removed. 24 406 records were excluded by title and abstract screening and 3594 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. 3350 articles were then excluded for a variety of reasons, and 244 full-text articles corresponding to 85 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Of these, 72 studies with 10 364 participants (3939 females and 5716 males with sex indicated) were included in the network meta-analysis. The randomised controlled trials included compared 20 psychological interventions given mainly as add-on to antipsychotics. Ethnicity data were not available. Family interventions (OR 0·35, 95% CI 0·24-0·52), relapse prevention programmes (OR 0·33, 0·14-0·79), cognitive behavioural therapy (OR 0·45, 0·27-0·75), family psychoeducation (OR 0·56, 0·39-0·82), integrated interventions (OR 0·62, 0·44-0·87), and patient psychoeducation (OR 0·63, 0·42-0·94) reduced relapse more than treatment as usual at 1 year. The confidence in the estimates ranged from moderate to very low. We found no indication of publication bias. INTERPRETATION: We found robust benefits in reducing the risk of relapse for family interventions, family psychoeducation, and cognitive behavioral therapy. These treatments should be the first psychosocial interventions to be considered in the long-term treatment for patients with schizophrenia. FUNDING: German Ministry for Education and Research.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Psicosocial/métodos , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metaanálisis en Red , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
BMJ ; 374: n1493, 2021 08 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34380627

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death globally. While pharmacological advancements have improved the morbidity and mortality associated with cardiovascular disease, non-adherence to prescribed treatment remains a significant barrier to improved patient outcomes. A variety of strategies to improve medication adherence have been tested in clinical trials, and include the following categories: improving patient education, implementing medication reminders, testing cognitive behavioral interventions, reducing medication costs, utilizing healthcare team members, and streamlining medication dosing regimens. In this review, we describe specific trials within each of these categories and highlight the impact of each on medication adherence. We also examine ongoing trials and future lines of inquiry for improving medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular diseases.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Costos de los Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/ética , Polifarmacia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Rol Profesional/psicología , Sistemas Recordatorios/instrumentación
10.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(6): 651.e1-651.e26, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34242627

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence is prevalent among women, and it has a substantial economic impact. Mixed urinary incontinence, with both stress and urgency urinary incontinence symptoms, has a greater adverse impact on quality of life and is more complex to treat than either stress or urgency urinary incontinence alone. Studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of treating both the stress and urgency urinary incontinence components simultaneously are lacking. OBJECTIVE: Cost-effectiveness was assessed between perioperative behavioral and pelvic floor muscle therapies combined with midurethral sling surgery and midurethral sling surgery alone for the treatment of women with mixed urinary incontinence. The impact of baseline severe urgency urinary incontinence symptoms on cost-effectiveness was assessed. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective economic evaluation was performed concurrently with the Effects of Surgical Treatment Enhanced with Exercise for Mixed Urinary Incontinence randomized trial that was conducted from October 2013 to April 2016. Participants included 480 women with moderate-to-severe stress and urgency urinary incontinence symptoms and at least 1 stress urinary incontinence episode and 1 urgency urinary incontinence episode on a 3-day bladder diary. The primary within-trial analysis was from the healthcare sector and societal perspectives, with a 1-year time horizon. Costs were in 2019 US dollars. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years and reductions in urinary incontinence episodes per day. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of combined treatment vs midurethral sling surgery alone were calculated, and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were generated. Analysis was performed for the overall study population and subgroup of women with Urogenital Distress Inventory irritative scores of ≥50th percentile. RESULTS: The costs for combined treatment were higher than the cost for midurethral sling surgery alone from both the healthcare sector perspective ($5100 [95% confidence interval, $5000-$5190] vs $4470 [95% confidence interval, $4330-$4620]; P<.01) and the societal perspective ($9260 [95% confidence interval, $8590-$9940] vs $8090 [95% confidence interval, $7630-$8560]; P<.01). There was no difference between combined treatment and midurethral sling surgery alone in quality-adjusted life-years (0.87 [95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.89] vs 0.87 [95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.89]; P=.90) or mean reduction in urinary incontinence episodes per day (-4.76 [95% confidence interval, -4.51 to 5.00] vs -4.50 [95% confidence interval, -4.25 to 4.75]; P=.13). When evaluating the overall study population, from both the healthcare sector and societal perspectives, midurethral sling surgery alone was superior to combined treatment. The probability that combined treatment is cost-effective compared with midurethral sling surgery alone is ≤28% from the healthcare sector and ≤19% from the societal perspectives for a willingness-to-pay value of ≤$150,000 per quality-adjusted life-years. For women with baseline Urogenital Distress Inventory irritative scores of ≥50th percentile, combined treatment was cost-effective compared with midurethral sling surgery alone from both the healthcare sector and societal perspectives. The probability that combined treatment is cost-effective compared with midurethral sling surgery alone for this subgroup is ≥90% from both the healthcare sector and societal perspectives, at a willingness-to-pay value of ≥$150,000 per quality-adjusted life-years. CONCLUSION: Overall, perioperative behavioral and pelvic floor muscle therapies combined with midurethral sling surgery was not cost-effective compared with midurethral sling surgery alone for the treatment of women with mixed urinary incontinence. However, combined treatment was of good value compared with midurethral sling surgery alone for women with baseline severe urgency urinary incontinence symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Urinaria/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/economía , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Combinada , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economía , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Cabestrillo Suburetral/economía , Cabestrillo Suburetral/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Incontinencia Urinaria/economía
11.
J Consult Clin Psychol ; 89(5): 469-475, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34124928

RESUMEN

Objective: The goal of the present study was to replicate and extend published preliminary evidence demonstrating that a relatively new treatment (Achieving Change through Value-Based Behavior [ACTV]) for men convicted of domestic violence significantly reduces recidivism compared to the standard treatment offered across the United States (the Duluth Model and/or cognitive-behavioral approaches). Method: Men convicted of domestic assault (DA) and court-mandated to a Batterers Intervention Program [N = 725; Mage = 34.9 years (SDage = 10.37 years)] were assigned to attend ACTV or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Participants were predominantly Black (63.3%). Recidivism, defined as any new convictions, any violent convictions, and any DA convictions, was examined up to 5 years posttreatment. Only men classified as medium or high risk were included. Results: Men in TAU were more likely to receive any conviction (95% CI [1.61, 4.40]), a violent conviction (95% CI [1.67, 9.60]), and a DA conviction (95% CI [1.36, 4.90]) compared to men in ACTV. Time to new conviction posttreatment was shorter for men in TAU versus ACTV (95% CI [2.16, 4.11]). Finally, the risk of receiving any new conviction (95% CI [1.46, 7.11]) was more strongly associated with noncompletion for TAU than ACTV participants. Conclusions: ACTV shows great promise for reducing recidivism compared to TAU. The present study represents the first time this intervention has been implemented in a state other than where it was developed and provides initial evidence for its generalizability and robustness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia Doméstica/estadística & datos numéricos , Reincidencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Agresión , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
12.
J Osteopath Med ; 121(7): 625-633, 2021 03 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33770828

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted the delivery of health care services throughout the United States, including those for patients with chronic pain. OBJECTIVES: To measure changes in patients' utilization of nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments for chronic low back pain and related outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A pre-post study was conducted within the Pain Registry for Epidemiological, Clinical, and Interventional Studies and Innovation (PRECISION Pain Research Registry) using data in the 3 months before and 3-6 months after the declaration of a national emergency related to COVID-19. Participants 21-79 years old with chronic low back pain were included in the study and provided self reported data at relevant quarterly encounters. Use of exercise therapy, yoga, massage therapy, spinal manipulation, acupuncture, cognitive behavioral therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and opioids for low back pain was measured. The primary outcomes were low back pain intensity and back related functioning measured with a numerical rating scale and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, respectively. Secondary outcomes included health related quality of life scales measured with the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, including scales for physical function, anxiety, depression, low energy/fatigue, sleep disturbance, participation in social roles and activities, and pain interference with activities. RESULTS: A total of 476 participants were included in this study. The mean age of participants at baseline was 54.0 years (standard deviation, ±13.2 years; range, 22-81 years). There were 349 (73.3%) female participants and 127 (26.7%) male participants in the study. Utilization of exercise therapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.57), massage therapy (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.83), and spinal manipulation (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.93) decreased during the pandemic. A reduction in NSAID use was also observed (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99). Participants reported a significant, but not clinically relevant, improvement in low back pain intensity during the pandemic (mean improvement, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.03-0.34; Cohen's d, 0.11). However, White participants reported a significant improvement in low back pain intensity (mean improvement, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10-0.46), whereas Black participants did not (mean improvement, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.46 to 0.19; p for interaction=0.03). Overall, there was a significant and clinically relevant improvement in pain interference with activities (mean improvement, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.20-2.02; Cohen's d, 0.20). The use of NSAIDs during the pandemic was associated with marginal increases in low back pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, decreased utilization of treatments for chronic low back pain did not adversely impact pain and functioning outcomes during the first 6 months of the pandemic. However, Black participants experienced significantly worse pain outcomes than their White counterparts.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Terapia por Acupuntura/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia por Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Manipulación Espinal/estadística & datos numéricos , Masaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Dimensión del Dolor , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas , Calidad de Vida , Estados Unidos , Yoga , Adulto Joven
13.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 78(6): 642-650, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33729432

RESUMEN

Importance: Several statistical models for predicting suicide risk have been developed, but how accurate such models must be to warrant implementation in clinical practice is not known. Objective: To identify threshold values of sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value that a suicide risk prediction method must attain to cost-effectively target a suicide risk reduction intervention to high-risk individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation incorporated published data on suicide epidemiology, the health care and societal costs of suicide, and the costs and efficacy of suicide risk reduction interventions into a novel decision analytic model. The model projected suicide-related health economic outcomes over a lifetime horizon among a population of US adults with a primary care physician. Data analysis was performed from September 19, 2019, to July 5, 2020. Interventions: Two possible interventions were delivered to individuals at high predicted risk: active contact and follow-up (ACF; relative risk of suicide attempt, 0.83; annual health care cost, $96) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; relative risk of suicide attempt, 0.47; annual health care cost, $1088). Main Outcomes and Measures: Fatal and nonfatal suicide attempts, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), health care sector costs and societal costs (in 2016 US dollars), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) (with ICERs ≤$150 000 per QALY designated cost-effective). Results: With a specificity of 95% and a sensitivity of 25%, primary care-based suicide risk prediction could reduce suicide death rates by 0.5 per 100 000 person-years (if used to target ACF) or 1.6 per 100 000 person-years (if used to target CBT) from a baseline of 15.3 per 100 000 person-years. To be cost-effective from a health care sector perspective at a specificity of 95%, a risk prediction method would need to have a sensitivity of 17.0% or greater (95% CI, 7.4%-37.3%) if used to target ACF and 35.7% or greater (95% CI, 23.1%-60.3%) if used to target CBT. To achieve cost-effectiveness, ACF required positive predictive values of 0.8% for predicting suicide attempt and 0.07% for predicting suicide death; CBT required values of 1.7% for suicide attempt and 0.2% for suicide death. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that with sufficient accuracy, statistical suicide risk prediction models can provide good health economic value in the US. Several existing suicide risk prediction models exceed the accuracy thresholds identified in this analysis and thus may warrant pilot implementation in US health care systems.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Modelos Estadísticos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Medición de Riesgo , Intento de Suicidio , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores/economía , Cuidados Posteriores/normas , Cuidados Posteriores/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/economía , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/normas , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/normas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo/economía , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Intento de Suicidio/economía , Intento de Suicidio/prevención & control , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
14.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(6): e23859, 2021 Feb 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33578513

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the feasibility of our newly-developed, integrated, and high-intensity individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) protocol for treatment-resistant chronic pain. METHODS: We conducted an open-labeled prospective single-arm trial for patients aged 18 years and above, suffering from chronic pain, and diagnosed with somatic symptom disorder with predominant pain. We provided 16 weekly sessions of CBT, each lasting for 50 minutes, which included 4 new strategies: attention shift, memory work, mental practice, and video feedback. For comparison, the study had a pre-test post-test design. The primary outcome was the change from baseline (week 1) to 16, as indicated by the Numerical Rating Scale and Pain Catastrophizing Scale. In addition, we evaluated depression, anxiety, disability, and quality of life as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with chronic pain underwent our CBT program. Though there was no reduction in pain intensity, catastrophic cognition showed statistically significant improvement with a large effect size. Depression, anxiety, and disability demonstrated statistically significant improvements, with small to moderate effect sizes. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Our newly integrated CBT program for chronic pain may improve catastrophic cognition, depression, anxiety, and disability. Large-scale randomized controlled studies are necessary to investigate the program's effectiveness in the future.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/terapia , Dolor Crónico/complicaciones , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/terapia , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Síntomas sin Explicación Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Psychol Med ; 51(1): 21-29, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33455594

RESUMEN

The majority of psychological treatment research is dedicated to investigating the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) across different conditions, population and contexts. We aimed to summarise the current systematic review evidence and evaluate the consistency of CBT's effect across different conditions. We included reviews of CBT randomised controlled trials in any: population, condition, format, context, with any type of comparator and published in English. We searched DARE, Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, CDAS, and OpenGrey between 1992 and January 2019. Reviews were quality assessed, their data extracted and summarised. The effects upon health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were pooled, within-condition groups. If the across-condition heterogeneity was I2 < 75%, we pooled effects using a random-effect panoramic meta-analysis. We summarised 494 reviews (221 128 participants), representing 14/20 physical and 13/20 mental conditions (World Health Organisation's International Classification of Diseases). Most reviews were lower-quality (351/494), investigated face-to-face CBT (397/494), and in adults (378/494). Few reviews included trials conducted in Asia, South America or Africa (45/494). CBT produced a modest benefit across-conditions on HRQoL (standardised mean difference 0.23; 95% confidence intervals 0.14-0.33, I2 = 32%). The effect's associated prediction interval -0.05 to 0.50 suggested CBT will remain effective in conditions for which we do not currently have available evidence. While there remain some gaps in the completeness of the evidence base, we need to recognise the consistent evidence for the general benefit which CBT offers.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Diabet Med ; 38(4): e14525, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33438251

RESUMEN

AIM: For people with type 2 diabetes, self management and fear of disease complication often cause psychological distress. Mindfulness and acceptance might be beneficial for reducing diabetes-related distress and glycaemic level. We systematically review the effects of mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions on diabetes distress and glycaemic level in community-dwelling adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Seven electronic databases (English and Chinese) were searched comprehensively from inception to June 2020. Data extraction and methodological quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria. RESULTS: Nine RCTs (801 participants) examining the effects of acceptance and commitment therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction and self-directed mindfulness practice were included. In the reviewed RCTs, the majority of participants (mean age: 50-66 years, average disease duration: 4-10 years) had suboptimal diabetes control (HbA1c >7.0%, 53 mmol/mol). Compared with controls, the interventions significantly reduced diabetes distress (standardised mean difference, SMD = -0.37, 95% confidence intervals, CI: -0.63, -0.12; p < 0.01) and HbA1c (mean difference, MD = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.67, -0.04; p = 0.03) up to 1-month post-intervention. However, the underpowered studies may have led to overestimation, the interventions for diabetes distress and HbA1c were heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: Within evidenced-based diabetes education programmes, mindfulness- and acceptance-based approaches may reduce distress and HbA1c levels and promote self care in people with type 2 diabetes. Further controlled trials are recommended to examine the clinical effectiveness of such programmes for people with type 2 diabetes of diverse clinical, cultural and socio-demographic backgrounds.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Atención Plena , Distrés Psicológico , Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/terapia
17.
Iran J Med Sci ; 46(1): 61-67, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33487793

RESUMEN

Background: Misophonia is an unpleasant condition, in which the feeling of excessive anger is triggered by specific sounds. The main objective of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) on anger in female students with misophonia. Methods: A study based on a non-concurrent multiple baseline design was conducted in 2018 at the School of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. Three female students aged 20-22 years were recruited using the multi-stage random sampling method. The study was conducted in three stages, namely baseline, intervention, and follow-up sessions. The Novaco anger questionnaire was used during the baseline sessions, intervention sessions (sessions three, six, and eight), and six weeks follow-up (two, four, and six weeks after the last intervention session). Data were analyzed using visual analysis, reliability change index (RCI), and recovery percentage formula. Results: CBT reduced the feeling of anger after the intervention and follow-up sessions. The recovery percentage at the end of the intervention sessions were 43.82, 42.28, and 9.09 for the first, second, and third participants, respectively. Conclusion: The findings of the present study confirm the effectiveness of CBT in reducing the feeling of anger in female students with misophonia.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Manejo de la Ira/normas , Ira , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/normas , Sonido/efectos adversos , Terapia de Manejo de la Ira/métodos , Terapia de Manejo de la Ira/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Irán , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
18.
J Evid Based Soc Work (2019) ; 18(1): 49-70, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32808591

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present meta-analysis is twofold: 1) determine the aggregated statistical effect of cognitive-behavioral couples therapy (CBCT) for relationship distress in randomized controlled trials and 2) use the findings to inform clinical social work practice and research. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases and the reference lists of included studies. The random effects model meta-analysis used a hedges' g effect size. RESULTS: After the removal of an outlier, a homogeneous (Q = 16.66, df = 12, p = .16, I 2 = 27.96), significant, moderate effect favoring CBCT (Hedges' g summary effect = .421, Z = 4.51, p < .0001, 95% confidence interval: 0.238 to 0.604, standard error = .093, variance = .009, k =  13) was obtained. DISCUSSION: It is anticipated that cognitive-behavioral/evidence-based social work clinicians and researchers will use the findings to support their clinical practice and advance their clinical research, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Servicio Social , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Distrés Psicológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
19.
Femina ; 49(12): 699-704, 2021. ilus
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: biblio-1358207

RESUMEN

A perda gestacional de repetição (PGR) é definida classicamente como três perdas consecutivas antes de 20 semanas de gestação. Ela afeta aproximadamente 3% dos casais que tentam conceber, quando se consideram pelo menos duas perdas, e cerca de 1%, quando acima de três perdas. A PGR está associada a diferentes fatores causais. Algumas mulheres não terão nenhuma anormalidade identificável nos protocolos investigativos atuais. O aborto pode causar doenças mentais, tais como depressão e ansiedade, e ser responsável por sentimentos como medo, raiva e culpa. Embora existam intervenções já estabelecidas para pacientes com perda gestacional com fator causal determinado, não existe nenhum tratamento comprovadamente efetivo em mulheres com perda gestacional inexplicada. O oferecimento do chamado Tender Loving Care pode levar a melhores resultados gestacionais nessas pacientes. Este artigo irá fazer uma revisão sobre os aspectos psíquicos em PGR e o cuidado suportivo que poderá ser realizado nessas pacientes.(AU)


Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is classically defined as three consecutive losses before 20 weeks of gestation. It affects approximately 3% of couples who try to conceive, when considering at least two losses, and about 1%, when considering three or more. RPL is associated with different causal factors. Some women will have no identificable abnormalities in current investigative protocols. Abortion can cause mental illness, such as depression and anxiety, and be responsible for feelings like fear, anger and guilt. Although there are interventions already established for patients with pregnancy loss with a determined causal factor, there is no proven effective treatment for women with unexplained pregnancy loss. The offer of the so-called Tender Loving Care can lead to better pregnancy results in these patients. This article will review the psychic aspects of recurrent pregnancy losses and the supportive care that can be performed in these patients.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Aborto Habitual/psicología , Aborto Habitual/terapia , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/terapia , Protocolos Clínicos , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático/psicología , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático/terapia , Depresión/psicología , Depresión/terapia , Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente
20.
Palliat Support Care ; 18(6): 644-647, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33349280

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is a common, distressing, and impairing psychological outcome experienced by informal caregivers (ICs) of patients with cancer. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and acupuncture both have known benefits for patients with cancer, but such benefits have yet to be evaluated among ICs. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effects of CBT-I and acupuncture among ICs with moderate or greater levels of insomnia. METHOD: Participants were randomized to eight sessions of CBT-I or ten sessions of acupuncture. RESULTS: Results highlighted challenges of identifying interested and eligible ICs and the impact of perception of intervention on retention and likely ultimately outcome. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RESULTS: Findings suggest preliminary support for non-pharmacological interventions to treat insomnia in ICs and emphasize the importance of matching treatment modality to the preferences and needs of ICs.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura/normas , Cuidadores/psicología , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/normas , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/terapia , Terapia por Acupuntura/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Cuidadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/enfermería , Neoplasias/psicología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA