Academic Output of Fellows of the American Association for Respiratory Care.

BACKGROUND: Research is critical for the advancement of respiratory care. Fellows of the American Association for Respiratory Care (FAARCs) are nominated based on their significant contributions to the respiratory care profession. Research output is potentially an important component of qualification for FAARC. The purpose of this study is to report the academic output of respiratory therapist (RT) FAARCs. METHODS: We identified FAARCs from the AARC web site. Research output was assessed by searching the Scopus and PubMed databases. We collected total research documents, citations, h-index, co-authors, and document type. We compared those with only the FAARC designation with RTs who are fellows in both the Society of Critical Care Medicine (FCCMs) and FAARC. RESULTS: We identified a total of 371 RT FAARCs, 4 RT FCCMs, and 10 with both designations. FAARCs were 70% male, 22% had a doctorate, 37% had a master's, 13% had a bachelor's, and 29% did not have a degree reported. There were no differences in sex or highest degree between FAARCs and FCCMs. FAARCs had a total of 3,724 publications and 110,207 citations while those with both designations had 1,304 publications and 43,181 citations. In Scopus, 46% of FAARCs had no publications, and 27% had ≥ 10 publications; of those with both credentials, 10% had no publications, and 70% had ≥ 10 publications. FAARCs inducted in 1998 and 1999 had significantly (P < .001) more publications than other eras. Compared to those with both credentials, FAARCs had fewer median publications (1 vs 50), lower h-index (1 vs 18), and fewer citations (1 vs 1,486), P < .001 for all. Total publications in PubMed were lower, and differences in publications were similar. CONCLUSIONS: RT FAARCs had a large number of publications and citations, although nearly half did not have any publications. Those with both FAARC and FCCM had significantly more academic output per fellow, although there are only 10 individuals with both credentials.

Assessing Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, and Use Among Respiratory Therapists.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice is at the forefront of providing quality patient care by using the best available evidence and clinical expertise, while also considering patient needs and preferences for clinical decisions. However, evidence-based practice may not be consistently used even when the evidence supports the therapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the factors associated with the use of evidence-based practice among respiratory therapy faculty teaching in a large community college system and post-professional students enrolled in a university-based, respiratory therapy baccalaureate degree-advancement program. METHODS: A non-probability, descriptive survey research design was used to develop and administer an online questionnaire. RESULTS: All respondents demonstrated sufficient knowledge and understanding of introductory concepts of evidence-based practice but knowledge of specific components of the evidence-based practice process was not as strong. Self-efficacy in knowledge and the use of evidence-based practice among faculty and degree-advancement students varied. Faculty and students rated their self-efficacy high in assessing patients' needs, values, and treatment preferences but ratings were lower for using the PICO (patient/population/problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) technique and interpreting common statistical tests. Students viewed their previous evidence-based practice learning experiences more favorably compared with faculty (P = .008). Faculty and students searched and read the research literature more often compared with critically appraising and using the research literature. Logistic regression analysis indicated no statistically significant relationship of knowledge, self-efficacy, and learning experiences to the use of evidence-based practice among respiratory therapy students, Χ 2 (4, N = 54) = 7.73; P = .10. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the results suggested that respiratory therapy faculty and students were knowledgeable and confident with regard to evidence-based practice but their use of evidence-based practice in clinical decisions was limited. Although the evidence-based practice knowledge, self-efficacy, and learning experiences had minimal influence on the use of evidence-based practice, the results of the study provide a foundation for future research.

Curriculum and Competency Evaluation in Respiratory Therapy Entry-to-Practice Programs.

BACKGROUND: Essential skills for respiratory therapists extend beyond the traditional scope of therapy. Respiratory therapists are expected to communicate effectively, deliver bedside education, and practice within interprofessional teams. Respiratory therapy entry-to-practice program accreditation standards require evaluation of student competence in communication and interprofessional practice. This study aimed to determine if entry into practice programs include curriculum and competency evaluation for oral communication, patient education, telehealth, and interprofessional activities. METHODS: The primary objective was to identify the curriculum and method of competency evaluation. The secondary objective was to compare degree programs. Directors of accredited respiratory therapy programs were invited to complete an anonymous survey with regard to degree program type, oral communication, patient education, learning strategies, telehealth, and interprofessional activities. Degree programs were classified as associate's of science 2 year, associate's of science < 2 year, or bachelor's of science. RESULTS: Of 370 invited programs, respondents in 136 programs (37%) completed the survey. Oral communication competence was evaluated by 82%. Patient education curriculum and competency evaluation were reported by 86% and 73%, respectively. Telehealth was rarely included or evaluated. Interprofessional activities were included by 74%, of whom 67% evaluated competency. Bachelor's of science programs were more likely to include a specific patient education course (P = .004), evaluate oral communication competency with unpaid preceptors (P = .036), and evaluate interprofessional competence through formal interprofessional programs (P = .005). Associate's degree 2-year programs used laboratory proficiency for patient education competency evaluation more often than other programs (P = .01). associate's of science < 2-year programs were more likely to include simulation experiences that involved motivational interviewing (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist among program types for curriculum and competency evaluation. Telehealth was rarely included or evaluated at any degree level. Programs should evaluate the need for enhanced patient education and telehealth instruction.

Barriers to Respiratory Care Research in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory therapists (RTs) are in a unique position to positively impact patient outcomes through respiratory care research. Research plays a key role in evidence-based medicine; however, few RTs perform and publish research. Identification of barriers experienced by RTs may help increase RT-driven research. Thus, we aimed to identify barriers and research interests for RTs. METHODS: American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) members were invited to anonymously complete a survey via an electronic link posted on AARC Connect. Survey domains included research training, experience, reasons for doing research, important respiratory topics, and barriers to conduct research. RESULTS: Responses from 82 surveys were analyzed. The majority were female (56%), and most had a graduate degree (61%), with a mean working experience of 25.3 ± 13.6 y. Fifty-seven percent of respondents reported at least one publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The desire to improve patient outcomes was the top-ranked reason for doing research. Most received research training through a graduate-level program (56%), but few had a formal research mentor (26%). Clinical research (67%) and quality improvement (63%) were the most common types of research. Data collection was the most common research role (51%). Invasive ventilation, advanced monitoring, and airway clearance were identified as the most important research topics. The primary barriers for RTs to conduct research were lack of protected time for research, opportunities to participate, training, departmental support, and mentorship. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of time, resources, and opportunities were identified as the primary barriers to RT research, and many RTs have not received formal research training. Resources such as formal mentorship, funding, and protected time may help increase RT participation in research.

How to Create a Primary Respiratory Care Model.

Respiratory therapists (RTs) are credentialed health professionals who specialize in assessment of pulmonary conditions, performing assessment of pulmonary function and delivering pulmonary therapeutics including aerosol therapy, and noninvasive and invasive mechanical ventilation. Respiratory therapists work closely with various clinicians including physicians, nurses, and therapy staff in a number of different settings including outpatient clinics, long-term facilities, EDs, and ICUs. RTs are integral in the treatment of patients with several acute and chronic conditions. In this review, we outline the importance, the elements of, and an approach to building a comprehensive RT program that allows delivery of high-quality care while ensuring RTs practice at the full scope of their licensure. Over the last two decades, we have implemented a suite of changes to the training, functioning, deployment, continuing education, and capacity building in our Lung Partners Program practice, under the supervision of a medical director, that have allowed us to create an effective inpatient and outpatient model of primary respiratory care.

Faculty Perspective on Interprofessional Education Competencies: Respiratory Therapy Compared to Other Allied Health Professions.

BACKGROUND: Interprofessional Education (IPE) provides a framework for collaborative education between health care specialties to improve patient care. In 2010, the Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel established the competencies of communication, ethics, roles and responsibilities, and teams and teamwork. Studies have assessed knowledge and attitudes about IPE in several allied health educational programs including respiratory therapy (RT). METHODS: We compared RT faculty to athletic training (AT), nutrition (NT), occupational therapy (OT), physical therapy (PT), and dental hygiene (DH) faculty. Faculty were asked to rank the IPE competencies according to importance. RESULTS: RT faculty ranked communication first, then teams and teamwork, roles and responsibilities, and last ethics. A Kruskal-Wallis Dwass-Steel-Chritchlow-Fligner pairwise analysis showed statically significant differences among allied health faculty rankings of IPE competencies. In communication, RT faculty responded statistically higher than AT (P < .001), DH P < .001), NT P < .001), and OT (P = .003). In ethics, RT faculty responded statistically lower than DH (P < .001), NT (P = .01), and PT (P < .001). In roles and responsibilities, RT faculty responded statistically higher than AT (P = .007) and OT (P < .001). In teamwork, RT faculty responded statistically higher than AT (P = .02), DH (P < .001), OT (P = .002), and PT (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: RT faculty who teach at different degree levels (associate's degree programs vs bachelor's and master's degree programs) had the same ranking of competencies, but they had a statistically significant difference for teamwork, with associate's degree faculty ranking teamwork lower than bachelor's and master's degree faculty.

A Pre-Pandemic Evaluation of the State of Staffing and Future of the Respiratory Care Profession: Perceptions of Louisiana Respiratory Therapists.

BACKGROUND: Workforce development for the respiratory therapy (RT) profession is a growing concern. Upcoming staffing difficulties are expected due to retirement, attrition from the profession, and decreased enrollment in accredited RT programs nationwide. This study assessed respiratory therapists' perceptions of staffing needs and future trajectory of the RT profession. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized a modified 39-question survey tool delivered via e-mail to 618 Louisiana members of the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) between November 2019-February 2020. RESULTS: The response rate was 19% (118/618). Although 50% of respondents perceived understaffing, 77.6% indicated the importance to remain in the RT profession. A majority (93.1%) agreed on the importance of maintaining an active membership in the AARC. Respondents working in a hospital setting perceived understaffed work environments more often than other groups. Salary was most important to the employee (33.6%, 39/116), followed equally by room for growth (14.7%, 17/116) and scope of practice (14.7%, 17/116). For the future of the profession, the ability to assess patients and develop care plans and the ability to receive reimbursement for services were indicated as most important factors. Most (69.8%) agreed that the entry-level minimum should be increased to the bachelor's degree, and 21.6% agreed the master's degree in RT should be supported to increase scope of practice. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated a consistent perception of understaffed work environments in respiratory care, and respondents expressed a perceived importance of remaining in the RT profession. This study also indicated support for raising the entry-level standard in RT and a desire for higher education to achieve professional growth and advancement.

Simulation Use in Entry-Into-Practice Respiratory Care Programs.

BACKGROUND: Teaching and learning using simulation-based methods is increasing in health professions education; however, the prevalence of simulation use in respiratory care programs to date has not been explored. METHODS: All 412 Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care (CoARC)-accredited entry-into-practice respiratory care programs were e-mailed a survey inquiring about simulation use as an educational tool in their programs. RESULTS: Of the initial 412 programs contacted, 124 returned the survey, for a 30% response rate. More than three-quarters of programs reported using simulation including 87% of associate degree programs, 75% of bachelor's degree programs, and 100% of master's degree programs. Simulation modalities differed by course and program as did length of simulation activities and debriefings. Simulation hours may not be substituted for learner's clinical time under CoARC guidelines, and 69% of respondents agreed with this stance; however, 66% of responding programs have mandatory simulation learning activities, and 68% believe the amount of simulation should be increased. The survey also revealed respiratory care faculty have limited training in the use of simulation. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based teaching and learning is widespread and varied, but there is a lack of faculty development in its use among respiratory care programs.

Multidisciplinary Tracheostomy Quality Improvement in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Building a Global Learning Community.

OBJECTIVES: To report experience with a global multidisciplinary tracheostomy e-learning initiative. METHODS: An international multidisciplinary panel of experts convened to build a virtual learning community for tracheostomy care, comprising a web-based platform, five distance learning (interactive webinar) sessions, and professional discourse over 12 months. Structured pre- and post-webinar surveys were disseminated to global participants including otolaryngologists, intensivists, nurses, allied health professionals, and patients/caregivers. Data were collected on audio-visual fidelity, demographics, and pre- and post-tutorial assessments regarding experience and skill acquisition. Participants reported confidence levels for NICU, pediatric, adult, and family care, as well as technical skills, communication, learning, assessment, and subdomains. RESULTS: Participants from 197 institutions in 22 countries engaged in the virtual education platform, including otolaryngologists, speech pathologists, respiratory therapists, specialist nurses, patients, and caregivers. Significant improvements were reported in communication (P < .0001), clinical assessments (P < .0001), and clinical governance (P < .0001), with positive impact on pediatric decannulation (P = .0008), adult decannulation (P = .04), and quality improvement (P < .0001). Respondents reported enhanced readiness to integrate knowledge into practice. Barriers included time zones, internet bandwidth, and perceived difficulty of direct clinical translation of highly technical skills. Participants rated the implementation highly in terms of length, ability for discussion, satisfaction, applicability to professional practice, and expertise of discussants (median scores: 4, 4, 4, 4 and 5 out of 5). CONCLUSIONS: Virtual learning has dominated the education landscape during COVID-19 pandemic, but few data are available on its effectiveness. This study demonstrated feasibility of virtual learning for disseminating best practices in tracheostomy, engaging a diverse, multidisciplinary audience. Learning of complex technical skills proved a hurdle, however, suggesting need for hands-on experience for technical mastery. While interactive videoconferencing via webinar affords an engaging and scalable strategy for sharing knowledge, further investigation is needed on clinical outcomes to define effective strategies for experiential online learning and virtual in-service simulations.

Students' Perception of Critical Care Training During Hospital Placements in a Regular Respiratory Care Bachelor's Degree Program in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess students' perception for critical care training during respiratory care hospital placements. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive design survey, about demographics, perceptions for involvement in caring for critical patients, and the perceived improvement in knowledge, skills, and confidence during hospital placement. RESULTS: Of the 80 students placed for hospital respiratory care training, 61 completed the study. Thirty-seven of the responders were males (60%). Forty-nine students (80%) agreed on the usefulness of the placements in preparing them for critical care situations. Students who completed practicum I agreed on the importance of simulation-based training before placements, and the involvement in caring for critically ill adults but not for pediatric or neonatal patients. Most of the students disagreed or strongly disagreed about involvement in caring for critically ill pediatric patients and neonates and denied any improvement in their confidence in caring for them. CONCLUSION: The majority of students perceived critical care placements as being more positive than negative. Responses that were more positive were among students while placed in adult intensive care. Students perceived that they were not involved and had no improvement in confidence when caring for pediatric and neonatal patients. Students perceived simulation-based training as important in preparing them for placements.

Interprofessional Education: TeamSTEPPS® and Simulation With Respiratory Therapy and Nursing Students in Their Final Year.

TeamSTEPPS is a curriculum designed to improve team communication to reduce medical errors and improve patient safety. This exploratory study used a questionnaire to explore differences in attitudes of 130 nursing and respiratory therapy students using a TeamSTEPPS-based interprofessional education seminar and simulation. Results support that students' attitudes regarding the principles Team Structure, Leadership, Situation Monitoring, Mutual Support, and Communication improved from Time 1 (preseminar) to Time 2 (postseminar; p < .05). This improvement was sustained at Time 3 (postsimulation) in all principles except for Mutual Support. Participation in a TeamSTEPPS seminar and simulation can influence attitudes among health care professional students.

Developing a Research Program Within a Respiratory Care Department.

Scientific research traditionally has been the domain of graduate school training, and it is based on higher cognitive levels associated with reflective thought. Such skills differ markedly from those needed to train competent respiratory therapists at the undergraduate level. Trainees at the undergraduate level need to acquire, comprehend, and apply large amounts of functional knowledge within a relatively brief time period. As a consequence, there is a pragmatic restriction on the level of complexity that characterizes pathophysiology, therapeutics, and associated technology that can be taught without causing confusion and thereby impeding the learning process. The era of evidence-based medicine is characterized both by the increasing complexity of medical technology and therapeutics. Because respiratory care is fundamentally a technology-driven profession, cultivating research skills among a select group of motivated practitioners is essential. Moreover, it is incumbent on all respiratory therapists to possess a rudimentary understanding of scientific methodology and a familiarity with the processes of reflective thought to become more discerning consumers of medical information. Organizing and implementing a research program within a respiratory care department or training program require forethought and devoted leadership. Crucial to this endeavor is developing mentors to guide those with little or no exposure to scientific inquiry. This article provides an overview of the pedagogical issues that underlie this predicament and then describes practical steps that can be taken to slowly build such a program.

The Impact of Respiratory Therapy International Education in the United States: Saudi International Students' Perceptions.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess graduate and undergraduate international respiratory therapy students' perceptions of the impact of their international educational experience on their life experience and development. METHODS: Data were collected through a validated descriptive survey. Four main dimensions of development were assessed: professional respiratory therapist (RT) role, global understanding, personal development, and intellectual development. RESULTS: The sample size was 62. Just over half of the subjects held a graduate degree in respiratory therapy, and 47% held an undergraduate degree in respiratory therapy. Female participants accounted for 13% of participants. The dimensions of development that were the most affected for RT undergraduate students were professional RT role and global understanding, whereas personal development was the most impacted area of development for graduate RT students. The time spent abroad for education had a positive correlation with the students' perceptions of development of their professional RT role (rs = 0.43, P = .001), personal development (rs = 0.26, P = .047), and overall survey development score (rs = 0.28, P = .036). Former graduates had a significantly higher perception of development of their professional practice (P = .035) and cultural interaction (P = .03) than did current students. CONCLUSIONS: International education has a large overall positive impact on students' life experience and development. The study findings support the value of promoting international education in RT programs due to its role in advancing students' development and the internationalization of RT education.

Respiratory Therapy Administrators' Perceptions of Effective Teaching Characteristics of Clinical Preceptors.

BACKGROUND: Clinical preceptors in respiratory therapy (RT) are expected to possess effective teaching skills and qualities that signify their knowledge, expertise, and professionalism. Thus, it is important to determine which teaching characteristics are effective among RT clinical preceptors from the administrators' perspective as well as the predictors for the administrators' decisions. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study of RT administrators was conducted in hospitals in a major southeastern metropolitan area in the United States. We used the modified version of the Effective Clinical Instructor Characteristics Inventory, which consists of 35 questions that cover 3 main domains: professional competence (15 questions), relationship with the students (8 questions), and personal attributes (12 questions); questions were answered according to a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 to 5). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify predictors of clinical preceptors' selection, reflected in their final scores. RESULTS: A total of 34 RT administrators participated in this study, representing 18 health care institutions. The response rate was 54.8%. Participants showed the most interest in the professional competence of clinical preceptors, with a total mean score of 68.6 ± 4.4. This characteristic was followed by personal attributes and relationship with students, with mean scores of 53.8 ±4.8 and 35.8 ± 3.4, respectively. The perception of managers from different managerial positions toward preceptors' professional competence showed a statistically significant difference (P = .042). The variable defined as years in clinical practice as a respiratory therapist was negatively associated with participants' final scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the professional competence of clinical preceptors is believed by RT administrators to be the most important behavioral characteristic. The results also indicate that role modeling and showing genuine interest in patients and their care are the most effective teaching characteristics of clinical preceptors.

Health-Literacy Training for First-Year Respiratory Therapy Students: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory therapists (RTs) should communicate with patients in a way that leads to patients understanding their discharge plans and medical device instructions. The teach-back method is a patient-centered, health-literate technique that allows health care professionals to confirm patient understanding. The purpose of this mixed-methods pilot study was to measure the use of teach-back by first-year undergraduate RT students in a simulation-center experience after a 1-h teach-back skills training. METHODS: First-year RT students' health literacy knowledge and belief in communication skills were measured using a pre- and post- survey about their knowledge and beliefs. A 1-h health literacy and teach-back skills training lecture (ie, intervention) was delivered after the pre-testing. RT students were then assessed for teach-back use during a regularly scheduled simulation center experience. Their experiences were recorded in a semistructured interview immediately after the simulation-center experience. RESULTS: 14 of 20 RT students used teach-back in the simulation center. Knowledge scores increased from 8.278 to 8.944 postintervention, and the median scores for belief increased from 111 to 117 postintervention. There was a statistically significant postintervention increase in knowledge scores (P < .001) and in communication belief scores (P = .038). Thematic content analysis revealed 2 primary themes for teach-back use: to confirm patient understanding and to confirm proper use of medical devices. Teach-back was not used due to the discharge scenario used in the simulation center, due to the student forgetting and/or being nervous, due to how engaged the patient was, or due to individual communication style. CONCLUSIONS: Results from our pilot study indicate that RT students may benefit from a 1-h health literacy and teach-back skills training. Furthermore, we identified reasons why the teach-back method was not used and determined what communication training students perceived would be helpful. Our findings can be used to help improve and implement communication skills training in the RT curriculum.

Training opportunities in thoracic ultrasound for respiratory trainees: are current guidelines practical?

Introduction: Respiratory trainees in the UK face challenges in meeting current Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) Level 1 training requirements for thoracic ultrasound (TUS) competence, specified as attending 'at least one session per week over a period of no less than 3 months, with approximately five scans per session performed by the trainee (under supervision of an experienced practitioner)'. We aimed to clarify where TUS training opportunities currently exist for respiratory registrars. Methods: Data were collected (over a 4-week period) to clarify the number of scans (and therefore volume of training opportunities) within radiology departments and respiratory services in hospitals in the South West, North West deaneries and Oxford. Results: 14 hospitals (including three tertiary pleural centres) provided data. Of 964 scans, 793 (82.3%) were conducted by respiratory teams who performed a mean of 17.7 scans per week, versus 3.1 TUS/week in radiology departments. There was no radiology session in any hospital with ≥5 TUS performed, whereas 8/14 (86%) of respiratory departments conducted such sessions. Almost half (6/14) of radiology departments conducted no TUS scans in the period surveyed. Conclusions: The currently recommended exposure of regularly attending a list or session to undertake five TUS is not achievable in radiology departments. The greatest volume of training opportunities exists within respiratory departments in a variety of scheduled and unscheduled settings. Revision of the competency framework in TUS, and where this is delivered, is required.